Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "Real Engineering" channel.

Please can you tell us where is this "studio" of such great size, that has such low gravity, a single light source with a dark sky and zero atmospheric resistance? Take care.
4
Hi, hope that you are well. "240 degree heat"....Heat is not measured in degrees, temperature is. Heat and temperature are not the same thing. Also, the measured temperature range during Apollo 11 mission was -23C to 7C. Take care.
4
So you believe NASA when they tell you that the Van Allen Belts exist? Interesting.
4
@willoughbykrenzteinburg Hi w, hope that you are well. "The force of gravity has nothing to do with the presence of an atmosphere". Just to clarify, obviously an atmosphere will not stay in place without the existence of a sufficient gravitational force, as I am sure that you are well aware. The point that I think that you are making (and please forgive me if I am putting words in your mouth) is that the presence of an atmosphere does not cause gravity, it is gravity that causes the presence of an atmosphere. Take care.
2
@willoughbykrenzteinburg Thank you for your polite reply. Yes of course I understood exactly what you meant but you would be surprised how some people misinterpret things! Take care.
2
So you believe things that random Russians tell you to believe?
2
Kubrick's family have repeatedly rebuked the outlandish fantasy that he had something to do with faking the Apollo Landings and have expressed their disgust at those who spread these lies. His daughter Vivian has asked conspiracy theorists (she refers to them as "malicious cranks") to stop using her fathers name in this way and said that what they say is "is manifestly a grotesque lie". Her open letter to moon landing deniers is easily found online. Please think about this and respect the family's wishes. Take care.
2
"Since Apollo 17 in 1952 failed"........Not the only thing that has failed I think.
2
" if there was no atmosphere they would have floated off If not tethered"...No mike, just no! It is gravity that will keep astronauts on the surface of a planet not the presence of an atmosphere. Take care.
1
@mikeg3335 You wrote "you are whacked out of your skull if you think it's a spinning that creates gravity"......I think that you are very confused as I never said such a thing! You then wrote "why does nasa use vacuum chambers with the atmosphere sucked out to do anti gravity training".....They don't!!! Here you seem to be amazingly confused. The atmosphere does not cause gravity! Gravity is a force associated with mass. The more massive an object is the greater its gravitational attraction will be. Gravity will still exist even if there is no atmosphere, such as is the case on the lunar surface. Take care and try to learn some Physics.
1
@mgh998 " it's not a spinning thing that creates gravity"....Of course it isn't, why are you directing this comment towards me!! .........A worse misconception is to think, as you seem to do, that it is an atmosphere that causes gravity!. See my comment to your other account below. Take care and learn some Physics.
1
Is there a reason why you have provided no evidence to back up your claim??
1
You wrote " no gravity" on the moon and that dust "should float away" in a vacuum. That is 2 big dumbs in the one sentence. Take care.
1
@obistanosanchez9244 Nope...that is just your delusionary fantasy. Take care.
1
(1) The "lander" did not "liftoff from moon....with three astronauts". The Ascent Stage of the LM had it's own rocket engine and propellent and using the Descent Stage as its launch pad it lifted off with 2 astronauts to get into lunar orbit and rendezvous with the Command Module. (2) Quite a lot of equipment was left behind on the lunar surface to compensate for the weight of the lunar rocks and soil samples brought back. (3) For reasons such as lover gravity and lack of air resistance, far less energy is required for the return trip. Take care.
1
@yassassin6425 Perhaps he means that the space between his ears is fake?
1
"we’re not able to send human beings through the Van Allen Radiation Belts today". Firstly, no one has said that there is a problem for humans passing through the Van Allen Belts per se. That was done nine times in the Apollo era and the same methods can be used again. The main modern challenge is the effect that the particle radiation could have on modern electronics and the consequential knock on effects on a crew should such electronic systems as guidance and navigation fail. The almost 4 week long Artemis 1 mission was successfully completed in December 2022 and we can look forward to a crewed mission returning to the moon in the next few years. Take care.
1