Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "Voice of America" channel.

@jaynun916 Totally false. Those are not the words that he used. Why do reality deniers always have to lie?
5
@spaceted3977 Nope, no NASA scientist ever used those words. No technology was ever lost, it simply became obsolete. Also what exactly do you man by "can we please see pictures of the sun and the stars when the sun is on the other side of earth?". It really doesn't make any sense. Take care.
5
"can we please see pictures of the sun and the stars when the sun is on the other side of earth?".....Find someone who is at longitude 180 degrees away from you and ask them to take photos for you!??!?!?
4
We have known that the Earth is a spherical planet many centuries before going to the moon. Take care.
3
There is no telescope on Earth that has the resolving power the Apollo objects left on the moon's surface. When you mention "galaxies light years away" it indicates that you are confusing distance with resolving power. However various Apollo landing sites have been imaged, photographed and identified by several lunar probes and satellites in lunar orbit. For example the Japanese SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings and matched the terrain to Apollo footage and the ISRO (India) Chandrayaan-2 orbiter captured an image of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage. The orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public in a presentation on September 3, 2021. China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2, also spotted traces of Apollo landing sites. In addition NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has also captured sharp clear images of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Take care.
2
I am sure that you have lots of credible and reliable evidence to back up your claim and that you won't "post and ghost" like so many others. Take care.
2
@spaceted3977 I never said that you "wanted pictures of the Earth". You wrote "Also, if we have all these pictures of earth from space, can we please see pictures of the sun and the stars when the sun is on the other side of earth?"...What exactly is that even supposed to mean? Take care.
2
After the Apollo 11 landing they went back to moon 6 more times with 5 more successful landings. Take care.
1
@MoonlightVKV You seem to be quite afraid of reality. Take care.
1
@aarongerig9223 Oscar Wilde once said that "sarcasm is the lowest form of wit"....but you have proved him wrong!.....Take care.
1
@aarongerig9223 Nope...your are the person bringing sordid comment and innuendo into the thread. Interesting how your mind works. Take care.
1
You really haven't thought this through. The "kicked up dust" clearly shows that the Apollo footage wasn't filmed on Earth. Take care.
1
@raven_wondervocals2166 Dust kicked up on the lunar surface will behave differently compared to an equilivent situation on Earth. On Earth dust will billow and form clouds as it encounters air resistance. It will also deaccelerate along the horizontal (x-axis) as air resistance slows its movement down. An analysis of the behaviour of the Apollo mission footage shown no such deacceleration of the dust. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum. Enjoy reading, take care.
1
Research principle of conservation of momentum.
1
@spaceted3977 The ascent propulsion system (APS) or lunar module ascent engine (LMAE) is a fixed-thrust hypergolic rocket engine developed by Bell Aerosystems for use in the Apollo Lunar Module ascent stage. It used Aerozine 50 fuel, and N2O4 oxidizer and provided 16,000 Newtons of thrust. Take care.
1
The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery and also advised NASA on the Apollo Program and were known about and studied well before the first moon landing. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
1
Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself telling you how the Apollo spacecraft passed through the radiation belts which he discovered and which are named after him. "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen
1
@ynk-4372 "truly unhinged individual"...Are you? Brave of you to admit it. Take care.
1
@ynk-4372 Thank you for your reply. It tagged me. take care.
1
@spongedebfatpants1308 It was "destroyed" only in the sense that when the Apollo Program was cut in the 1970's that the hardware, facilities, manufacturing equipment all became obsolete and were not replaced or updated. Try to gain an understanding of the background and context rather than simply latching on to one word and trying to shoehorn your own interpretation into it. Take care.
1
@spongedebfatpants1308 And how exactly have you been insulted? Explaining to you that cherry-picking words and phrases out of context is misleading and suggesting that you first at least to attempt to gain an understanding of background and context is good advice. Take care.
1
HEAT and TEMPERATURE are not the same thing. This is basic Physics. Take care.
1
@bigfist255 Heat and Temperature are not the same thing. The Van Allen Belt's may have a high temperature but little matter therefore carry little Heat Energy. This is basic Physics so please think before attempting to dispute it. Your example illustrated the difference between Heat and Temperature. Open an oven door and the hot gases that strike you can be at a temperature of > 300C but they will not unduly harm you. Put your hand into a container of water at100C (a much lower temperature) and you will experience a serious injury. Take care.
1