Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "Primal Space" channel.

@mrvivek815 After the Apollo 11 landing there were 6 more trips to the moon with 5 further landings. At least attempt to keep up. Take care.
3
@metalicminer6231 You wrote that the dust "fell back as rapidly as it would on earth". Totally incorrect. On Earth dust will billow and form clouds due to the resistance of the atmosphere. On the footage of the LRV you can clearly see that the dust is not impeded by atmospheric resistance in any way. The dust particles follow parabolic trajectories exactly as we would expect in a vacuum. This footage can only have been filmed in a low gravity, vacuum environment. Take care.
2
If you think that the Apollo Missions did not happen then please produce your evidence. Take care. (PS: A lack of knowledge of basic Physics or cherry-picking quotes out of context is not evidence).
2
Nope.....
2
@mrvivek815 Thank you for your reply. Not even slightly. It is not simply a matter of "deciding" to go or not to go. A large number of conditions and variables had to perfectly align for this to be possible. The Apollo Program, landing men on the Moon and successfully returning them to Earth has few, if any, equals in terms of human exploration. The sheer level of manpower, resources and finance needed for this endeavour as well as political will and imperative mark this out as a unique event without comparison. The Apollo Program required over 400,000 people in the US to be involved. These included some of the top engineers, chemists, Physicists and other subject experts that were available. In addition there was the involvement of some 50,000 individuals oversees in such tasks as the various tracking stations of the MSFN (Manned Space Flight Network) right across the Globe. The MSFN used a network of giant satellite dishes and radio antenna such as Goldstone (70m), Parkes, Australia (64m), Honeysuckle Creek, Australia (24m) and Madrid, Spain (34m). The Saturn V Rocket was manufactured by multinational companies such as Boeing, Douglas and North American Aviation. The Landing Module by Grumman and computers by IBM. Dozens of other firms were involved. NASA budget was 4.41% of the Federal Budget in 1966 compared to 0.48% in 2020. The Apollo Program lasted over a decade and built upon the work done in the Mercury and Gemini Programs. During the Apollo era NASA had basically just one aim, to fulfil Kennedys promise of "landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth". The geo-political situation of the 1960's and the Cold War also gave huge impetus to the project. Although all 6 Moon Landings occurred in the presidency of Richard Nixon they were very much in the public mind associated with JFK. Nixon was not particularly keen in continuing the Apollo Missions. By 1972 the Apollo Program had fulfilled all of its objectives and more. The space exploration agenda moved on to satellites, Skylab, Voyager Probes and the Space Shuttle. Thankfully after over five decades the scientific, financial and political conditions have aligned once again and the Atriums Program looks set to return humans to the Moon. Take care.
2
Off you go, provide the evidence to back up your claim.
2
Are you a geologist?
1
China's lunar probe, Chang'e 2, which is capable of capturing lunar surface images with a resolution of up to 1.3 metres, spotted traces of the Apollo landing sites and the lunar Rover in 2010. Take care.
1
@ValMartinIreland Hi val, hope that you are well. Read what, you have provided no link? Take care.
1
Hi Juan, hope that you are well. It is unfortunate that you weren't able to the most basic research before posting, otherwise you wouldn't have made so many errors. (1) The Lunar Rover (not "buggy") was powered by two 36 volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries developed by Eagle-Picher. (2) " the extreme temperature". All the Apollo landings were planned to occur at lunar dawn, when the temperatures were far from "extreme". For example, during the Apollo 11 mission, the measured temperature range was between -23°C to 7°C (250K to 280K). (3) "0 gravity". The moon does not have zero gravity! The acceleration due to gravity on the lunar surface is 1.6 m/s2 which is about one sixth that of the Earth's surface. Take care.
1
"with the scorching hot 250F degree temperatures". Such a temperature was never experienced on any of the Apollo moon landings. For example the measured temperature range for the Apollo 11 landing was -23C to 7C. Take care.
1
Various Apollo landing sites have been imaged, photographed and identified by several lunar probes and satellites in lunar orbit. For example China's lunar probe, Chang'e 2, which is capable of capturing lunar surface images with a resolution of up to 1.3 metres, spotted traces of the Apollo landing sites and the lunar Rover in 2010. The Japanese SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings and matched the terrain to Apollo footage and the ISRO (India) Chandrayaan-2 orbiter captured an image of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage. The orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public in a presentation on September 3, 2021. In addition NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has also captured sharp clear images of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Take care.
1
@graverobbersministry8939 Hi again GM, hope you are well. Thank you for your reply. Personal belief is irrelevant, it is simply a fact that the Apollo landing sites have been identified and photographed by several satellites and probes from a variety of different countries. This is what you asked for and this is what you got. It is not my problem if you deny evidence. Take care.
1
@JohnM3665570 Hi John, you mentioned "A guy in Houston was operating the camera by remote". This was Ed Fendell. For various reasons his attempt to film the lift of of assent stage of Apollo 15 and 16 were not very successful but he got the filming of Apollo 17 spot on. take care.
1
Hi ozelot, hope that you are well. I have found that it is pretty much guaranteed that anyone who mentions the Van Allen Belts as an insurmountable obstacle to space travel really knows next to nothing about radiation or these belts. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
1
Hi ozelot, hope that you are well. You wrote "range of -157°C to +121°C". While it is correct to state that the moon's surface experiences a wide temperature range over the course of a lunar day (in the range 140K to 400K) However these temperatures were never encountered during any of the Apollo missions. All the Apollo landings were planned to occur at lunar dawn, when the temperature is somewhere in the middle of the range. For example, during the Apollo 11 mission, the measured temperature range was between -23°C to 7°C (250K to 280K). Take care.
1
9 months since your post and ghost and still no proof. Take care.
1
"THE TEMPERATURE on moon's surface?? 250 DEGREES CELSIUS".....Totally incorrect. The maximum and minimum moon surface temperatures are about 120C to -130C and these are the max and min over a lunar day, some 29.5 Earth days. Such temperatures was never experienced on any of the Apollo moon landings. For example the measured temperature range for the Apollo 11 landing was -23C to 7C. Take care.
1
"Send more Chuck Berry!".
1
@metalicminer6231 Just for your information, over 500 rock and soil samples are released by the Lunar Sample Laboratory Facility at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas every year to scientists and organizations who wish to study lunar geology. At this stage literally tens of thousands of geological experts from all over the globe have examined the samples, published their findings and verified their origin as lunar. However if you have any evidence to the contrary then please elaborate. Take care.
1
Quite a lot more actually. What the LM looks like is irrelevant. You are not providing even a scrap of evidence just your personal incredulity. Please outline using scientific and engineering principals and by providing the relevant research and calculations what exactly prevented the LM fulfilling its function. Take care.
1
Ok....start with the proof. Take care.
1
There is no terrestrial telescope that has ever been built with the resolution to see objects that small on the lunar surface. However, various Apollo landing sites have been imaged, photographed and identified by several lunar probes and satellites in lunar orbit. For example China's lunar probe, Chang'e 2, which is capable of capturing lunar surface images with a resolution of up to 1.3 metres, spotted traces of the Apollo landing sites and the lunar Rover in 2010. The Japanese SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings and matched the terrain to Apollo footage and the ISRO (India) Chandrayaan-2 orbiter captured an image of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage. The orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public in a presentation on September 3, 2021. In addition NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has also captured sharp clear images of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Take care.
1