Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "Joe u0026 Matt Walsh Go Back and Forth on the Moon Landing Conspiracy" video.

  1. Just for the record. The Dutch petrified wood never had anything to do with NASA, the Apollo astronauts or the US government. The family of a former Dutch Prime Minister presented what they claimed to be a lunar sample to a Dutch Art museum and received a sizable tax write off in return. The first geologist to view the sample immediately realised that it was not of lunar origin. This clearly demonstrates that competent geologists will easily know the difference between material of terrestrial and lunar origin. Over 400 samples of lunar rock and soil are released every year for research by The Lunar Sample Laboratory at the Johnson Space Centre, Houston. To date thousands of scientists of various fields have examined lunar samples and verified their lunar origin. Thank you for raising this point so the facts can be made clear. Take care.
    3
  2. Assuming that you mean the filming of the lift-off of the Ascent Stage of the LM on the Apollo 17 mission. The RCA TV camera was mounted on the LRV. The rate of assent, the position of the camera, the communications delay and other details were all worked out in advance. The camera was operated remotely from Mission Control, Houston by Ed Fendell. Also the footage lasts less than 60 seconds, not many minutes as you seem to think. Take care.
    3
  3. You didn't provide and evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    3
  4. "would be sucked out by the vacuum of space"...A vacuum does not suck or exert a force in any way. Perhaps learn some basic Physics before commenting on these matters. Take care.
    3
  5. Totally incorrect. On the USS Hornet, when they arrived back they were clearly tired but quite joyful and full of smiles. Also in the Apollo 11 post flight press conference some 3 weeks later they were smiling, laughing and cracked jokes with reporters. Have you been fed by peddlers of conspiracy rather doing your own research? Take care.
    2
  6. So what technology specifically was missing during the Apollo Program?
    2
  7. "There wasn’t any tech out in space to track it".......The Apollo 11 flight (and previous and subsequent missions) and its communications were tracked by radio telescope teams in numerous countries (such as US, UK, Italy, Germany, Australia, not to mention the USSR) all the way to the moon and back. Even some amateurs managed to detect, record and verify the direction of the communications. Take care.
    2
  8. The Apollo astronauts wished to take correctly exposed photographs of the bright, daytime lunar surface. Starlight, which is very dim, will not register under such conditions. If the camera settings/exposure time was increased so as to detect starlight then everything else in the photograph would be greatly overexposed and just appear as a mass of glare. Take care.
    2
  9. You 100% have produced zero evidence to back up your claim. Take care.
    2
  10. So if you completely ignore the dozens of scientific experiments carried out during the Apollo missions and totally ignore all the Lunar Surface Experiments then you can say that there was no science involved.....Is that your point? Take care.
    2
  11. Because the Apollo equipment is simply too small to be seen from Earth. There is no Earth based telescope with the resolution to be able to detect the equipment. Take care.
    2
  12. And the evidence to back up your claim is?
    2
  13. And your evidence is?
    1
  14. You didn't provide any evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    1
  15. Stanley Kubrick never said any such thing but the actor Tom Mayk sure said that in the 2015 mockumentary film Shooting Stanley Kubrick. Have we another who hasn't done their research?
    1
  16. And what evidence is that? Take care.
    1
  17. Stanley Kubrick had zero involvement in the Apollo Program and never claimed to have any. Buzz Aldrin is still alive. Take care.
    1
  18. Please get your facts correct and speak the truth. Buzz Aldrin never said any such thing. Take care.
    1
  19.  @joseandrescazares6024  I was saying that what you said is non-factual and quite absurd. Do try to put a little basic research into your comments before falling for conspiracy nonsense. Take care.
    1
  20.  @chicas7569  No Apollo astronaut, Dr. Aldrin included, has ever even hinted at the Apollo Program being fake in any way. Please stay with the facts. Take care.
    1
  21.  @chicas7569  Again, your comment makes zero sense. What question, what interview, what answer, who gave this answer. Full details please. Take care.
    1
  22. In 1969...really???
    1
  23. "we have been to the moon once but only once"....Are you just trolling or do you really not know that there were 9 manned missions to the moon with 6 successful manned landings? Take care.
    1
  24. Correct. Satellites in lunar orbit from 5 different countries have identified the various Apollo landing sites. Take care.
    1
  25. You didn't provide and evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    1
  26. Dr. James Van Allen said otherwise.
    1
  27. No Apollo astronaut has ever "admitted he never went" to the moon. Have you been fed short cherry-picked comments by a peddler of conspiracy who hid the context from you? Take care.
    1
  28. Can you list the ways in which the technology needed for a manned lunar mission has advanced since the end of Apollo? Take care.
    1
  29. The particle radiation in the VAB's does not significantly interfere with Unified S-Band frequencies. Take care.
    1
  30. Please list what "technology did Not exist".
    1
  31. Satellites in lunar orbit from 5 different countries have identified and verified the various Apollo landing sites. Take care.
    1
  32. You may be interested to know that totally separate to the tiny Goodwill moonrock samples given out by the Nixon administration, NASA release over 400 samples of lunar rock and soil to international researchers each year. To date thousands of samples have been released and examined by thousands of scientists of one type or another globally resulting in many thousands of research papers being published. The lunar origin of these rocks is not in question. Take care.
    1
  33. Data from the European Space Agency shows that an extremely tenuous portion of the Earth's atmosphere stretches out to the moon. This does not change the distance from Earth to moon which is measured to be about 384,400km. Take care.
    1
  34. The temperature of what exactly? The moon is in a vacuum. A vacuum basically does not have a temperature as it does not contain atoms/molecules/particles. The temperatures that you mention are close to the maximum and minimum of the lunar surface A large mass of matter can not change temperature virtually instantly as you seem to think. Heat transfer does not work like that. Take care.
    1
  35. But siberel shows no evidence of any kind. He just makes unevidenced claims which are totally debunked by the very footage that he puts forward. Do not be so gullible. Take care.
    1
  36. What exactly did you expect the flags to do when the astronauts were moving them? Stay still??
    1
  37. Any actual evidence to go with your rant?
    1
  38. So what would you expect the flags to do when the astronauts were moving them during assembly? Stay still? Especially in a vacuum where there is no atmospheric resistance to remove energy so a flag will oscillate very easily. Take care.
    1
  39. You correctly mention how dust kicked up on the lunar surface will behave differently compared to an equilivent situation on Earth. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and low gravity environment. Enjoy reading, take care.
    1
  40.  @IHOPROB  Thank you for your polite reply. Take care.
    1
  41.  @chicas7569  Thank you for your comment. Would you care to elaborate? Take care.
    1
  42. So you believe NASA and James Van Allen when they tell you that these belts exist but do not seem curious enough to research their opinions on how to pass through them?
    1
  43.  @majbach1968  Thank you for your reply. In some ways you are correct, may so called flat earthers and moon-landing deniers do not believe the nonsense that they spout but there are many who are simply scientifically illiterate and intellectually uncurious who will not do their own research. Take care.
    1
  44. How about the fact that absolutely none of the moon rocks given to any other nation ever turned out to be fake. Do try to get your facts correct. The Dutch petrified wood never had anything to do with NASA, the Apollo astronauts or the US government. The family of a former Dutch Prime Minister presented what they claimed to be a lunar sample to a Dutch Art museum and received a sizable tax write off in return. The first geologist to view the sample immediately realised that it was not of lunar origin. This clearly demonstrates that competent geologists will easily know the difference between material of terrestrial and lunar origin. Over 400 samples of lunar rock and soil are released every year for research by The Lunar Sample Laboratory at the Johnson Space Centre, Houston. To date thousands of scientists of various fields have examined lunar samples and verified their lunar origin. Thank you for raising this point so the facts can be made clear. Take care.
    1
  45. erased what???????
    1