Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "CNN" channel.

  1. "Blood Clots" and "Inflammed (sic) Hearts".....Tiny, tiny risk from a vaccine, much higher risk of these if you catch Covid. Take care.
    9
  2.  @trendynow1369  Hi TN, Covid-19 complications from blood clots can happen across all ages and previous good health does not preclude negative outcomes. One study that I have read looked at Covid-19 patients who had experienced a stroke due to a blood clot. The study found that 42% of participants were under age 55 and had no existing risk factors for stroke. ("Thrombotic Neurovascular Disease in COVID-19 Patient", Neurosurgery (Congress of Neurological Surgeons) , Volume 87, Issue 3, September 2020. Also, several major studies have conclude that the risk of blood clotting diseases caused by the Covid-19 vaccines is significantly outweighed by the risk of clotting diseases caused by infection with the COVID-19 virus, eg: "Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing", British Medical Journal, August 2021. Take care.
    3
  3.  @nofacade100  Several major studies have conclude that the risk of blood clotting diseases caused by the Covid-19 vaccines is significantly outweighed by the risk of clotting diseases caused by infection with the COVID-19 virus, eg: "Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing", British Medical Journal, August 2021. Take care.
    3
  4. Hi steve, hope that you are well. Remember that just because you are gullible and have poor critical thinking ability this doesn't mean that everyone else has the same also. Take care.
    2
  5. Any small chance of a negative side effect from a Covid-19 vaccine is statically much, much fewer than many medications currently on the market and incredibly fewer complications than if you develop the disease Covid-19. For example research shows that there is an incredibly small risk of developing rare blood clots following the British AstraZeneca vaccine (max of 900 per 10 million people) while large scale research (>29 million people) by Julia Hippisley-Cox et al shows that the risk of serious blood clots developing after Covid-19 infection is many times greater. Compare this to the risk of blood clots developing from the conceptive pill which is estimated to be 1 in 1000 per year. Lets keep things in perspective. Take care.
    2
  6. Dr Campbell is neither a medical doctor or a scientist. Rather than giving "all the science" he seems to very often just give a very small portion of it and ignores a large amount of research that does not support his pet theories. Take care.
    2
  7. You left out the words "uneducated", "incurious", "poor critical thinking ability" and "Bullshit Receptive".
    2
  8.  @RealKlausSchwab  "Jean therapy".........no offence meant but by "experimental Jean therapy" do you mean the wearing of some new type of denim jacket?
    2
  9. "he is only human" ...so are the people that he met but chose not to inform them that he was Covid-19 positive. Did he even have enough respect for them to wear a mask??
    2
  10. Your education?
    2
  11.  @budalaidiotska6947  No, lets talk now about why he put many peoples heath, rights and freedoms at risk by meeting them and not even bothering wear a mask or to inform them that he had the disease. Is that what a decent person would do?
    2
  12.  @to6955  Hi T O. My deepest condolences on your fathers passing, may he RIP.
    2
  13. You fucking LIAR, you no produce fucking evidence.
    1
  14. Hi dg, thank you for your reply. I do not seek to discredit anybody only to point out facts. Dr Campbell is a Nurse and has a PhD in education from the University of Bolton but he is not a medical doctor or a scientist and to be fair, he has never claimed to be these things. It is regrettable that he has suggested in some of his videos that the drug Ivermectin has some benefits in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 without ever examining the bulk of the evidence that suggests that this drug has no effect or even mentioning the fact that several research papers promoting the use of Ivermectin have been proved to be fraudulent and riddled with errors & ethical issues and have been withdrawn. He has rightly been called to task by real scientists for his treatment of this issue who have pointed out that he is confusing causation and correlation. Dr Campbell does however have a good presenting style. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  15.  @sugadagud3093  Hi sd, it is disappointing to see that you are so triggered by my factual opinions and have to resort to (attempting) bad language. There is a lot to be said about the advice given by Dr. Campbell and I genuinely have the highest regard for Nurses and nurse educators, however I give higher regard to the opinions of medical doctors and scientists. As for Ivermectin, I have read most (if not all) the studies and while it showed effectiveness against the SARS-Cov-2 virus in vitro (as many chemicals will) and in silico the clinical trials have shown no real effectiveness. The only major clinical study that seemed to show a significant benefit, Elgazzar et al, has been withdrawn after major ethical issues emerged which included the majority of the patients who were listed as dying from Covid-19 in the study actually passing away before the study had even started and at least 79 of the records being obvious clones of other records. The studies by Niaee et al, Carvallo et al, as well as several meta studies have also been withdrawn. Forgive me if I am wrong but I do not recall Dr. Campbell mentioning this in his videos. Take care & speak truth.
    1
  16.  @sugadagud3093  Hi again sd, all is good. Yes, it is very clear that vaccines on their own will not end this pandemic and the WHO have stated this months ago. They have prevented a lot of serious illness and deaths though. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  17.  @ozark8043  Hi Hus, if you want to talk about "heart inflammation" then the risk of this from a vaccine is tiny, the risk of this from catching Covid is much greater. Take care.
    1
  18.  @ozark8043  Hi HD, thank you for your comment. Research show that heart inflammation is a very rare side-effect of the Covid vaccines and that the benefits of Covid vaccines far outweigh any tiny risks. Also the research shows that these usually present within 14 days of vaccination. For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 145 cases of myocarditis and 138 cases of pericarditis out of 177m doses have been suspected and I have also seen research that mentions an increased risk of about average 2.5 cases per 100,000 people). Compare this with the research showing that COVID-19 infection is linked to an increased risk of 11 cases of heart muscle inflammation per 100,000 people (110 per million people). (New England Journal of Medicine, Aug 2021). So if a person is worried about heart inflammation then the should realise that the risk is much greater should they catch Covid than from a vaccine. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  19. "Twenty-four hours after International Holocaust Remembrance Day and on The National Day of Remembrance of the Québec City Mosque Attack and Action against Islamophobia, there are Nazi flags being flown in public, in Canada, on Parliament Hill. This should be horrifying to all Canadians.", Shimon Koffler Fogel, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), Canada. This "freedom" convoy has been controlled and organised all the way by individuals who were heavily involved in the QAnon, anti-vax, Covid-denying and anti 5G movements and by those who think that Bill Gates is promoting the injection of 5G-enabled microchips into the population, etc. It is truly a collation of the conspiracy theorists. Take care & think critically.
    1
  20.  @jennifersmith4864  That would be ironic. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  21. Hi Bill. Can you cite where this alleged quote was made. I have seen it do the rounds but nobody seems to give the original source. Thank you.
    1
  22.  @billyork8181  Hi Bill, thank you for your reply. Different versions of this "quote" have been doing the rounds for several months. Needless to say, it is a mixture of words not spoken by Dr. Mullis, quotes from other people and a little bit from Dr. Mullis taken out of context. Much of the "quote" comes from John Lauritsen in 1996. Mullis did actually say the words "you can find almost anything in anybody" in a panel discussion in 1993 but he was referring to HIV patients and in particular AIDS patients with multiple viral infections. His actual words were " if you have it (HIV) then there is a good chance you have also got lots of other ones (viruses)...and in that case "you can almost find anything in anybody (any HIV patient)". Dr. Mullis was in no way devaluing the PCR test that he developed. He was simply saying that it was difficult to distinguish between different viruses in a person infected with multiple viruses. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  23. So do you think that it is OK for a person to gave completely false information on a visa application and then also to put many peoples health, welfare and rights at risk by making international trips, attending events, giving interviews to journalists, meeting children while Covid-19 positive? Not once did he inform any of the people that he interacted with that he had the disease, not once did he wear a mask. Is that the action of a decent person? Take care & speak truth.
    1
  24. "The footage of the 6 manned missions the moon have all gone missing".......................Nope " the technology employed for the moon missions have all been destroyed"....................Only in the sense that it has gone obsolete. " zero gravity".......If you think that there is "zero gravity" then you really do not have the slightest clue about space exploration. Take care.
    1
  25. You wrote that the dust "quickly falls back to the ground in a second or two which mimics what dust would do in earth gravity". Totally incorrect. On Earth dust will billow and form clouds due to the resistance of the atmosphere. On the footage of the LRV you can clearly see that the dust is not impeded by atmospheric resistance in any way. The dust particles follow parabolic trajectories exactly as we would expect in a vacuum. This footage can only have been filmed in a low gravity, vacuum environment. Take care.
    1
  26.  @bannedvids  Feel free to provide reliable and trustworthy evidence for that claim..
    1
  27.  @bannedvids  You seem to have been misinformed!. The SARS-Cov-2 virus was isolated and identified as far back as Jan 2020 and its entire genetic makeup (genome) was widely published online within days (one example published in the Lancet, Vol 395, Feb 2020). Other examples are "Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea", Park et al, Journal of Korean Medical Science, Feb 2020 and "SARS-CoV-2 isolation from the first reported patients in Brazil", Danielle Bastos Araujo, March 2020. The same has occurred for the many hundreds of variants that have been identified as well. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  28.  @bannedvids  Hi AR, thank you for your reply. Yesterday you had the mistaken impression that the virus that causes the disease Covid-19 was never isolate! Now you seem to be even more confused! The SARS-Cov-2 virus is the virus that causes the disease Covid-19! I have cited for you a number of research papers that show that this virus was isolated as far back as March 2020. However it is entirely possible that you may have some difficulty reading them as you do not even know the name of the virus or seem be able to distinguish the virus from the disease that it causes. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  29. Yes, but what is your opinion of Biden?
    1
  30. It is sad that this "restaurant" did not respect these peoples ideals, freedoms or believes. In what part of communist Russia did this take place in ?
    1
  31. "No looming dust when the pod landed, no looming dust when the astronauts walked around and no looming dust when the pod left the moon".......On Earth dust will billow and form clouds due to atmospheric resistance. On the moon, which does not have an atmosphere, the dust will not billow or form clouds but will immediately fall back to the surface.....as you have noted. You have spotted some undisputable evidence that this footage is filmed in a vacuum! Take care.
    1
  32. "Oh and who was left behind on the moon to film the pod leaving the moon?"...Only a complete idiot would think that somebody was "left behind".....and the method that the lift-off of the Ascent Stage of Apollo 17 was filmed would have taken you just a few seconds to Google. The lift-off was broadcast by the TV camera attached to the LRV and the camera was operated by Ed Fendell in Mission Control, Houston. Take care.
    1
  33. (1) The VAB's are not radioactive. Please learn the difference between radiation and radioactivity. (2) The temperatures on the lunar surface vary from about 140K to 400K over the course of a lunar day/night cycle which lasts about 29.5 Earth days. However these temperatures were never encountered during any of the Apollo missions. All the Apollo landings were planned to occur at lunar dawn, when the lunar temperature is somewhere in the middle of the range. For example, during the Apollo 11 mission, the measured temperature range was between -23°C to 7°C (250K to 280K). (3) The VAB's are only a problem if you spend prolonged time inside in their denser regions. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    1
  34.  @budalaidiotska6947  I think that you are confused. More than 83% of Australian want him deported. They want nothing to do with lies, deceit and people who put peoples lives, right and freedoms at risk by spreading the virus when Covid positive. Take care & speak truth.
    1
  35.  @budalaidiotska6947  Hi again BI, hope you are well. I can not but notice that you have totally ignored my question "why did he put many peoples heath, rights and freedoms at risk by meeting them and not even bothering wear a mask or to inform them that he had the disease. Is that what a decent person would do?"...I guess the question answers itself to be honest. Take care & speak truth.
    1
  36.  @budalaidiotska6947  Hi again bi, thank you for your continued comments. Nowhere in your post did you address my question "why did he put many peoples heath, rights and freedoms at risk by meeting them and not even bothering wear a mask or to inform them that he had the disease. Is that what a decent , honest person would do?" Instead we get continued obfuscation which I think shows us all that you know his position is undeniable. It is a pity that this tennis player doesn't man-up and accept the consequences of the choices that he freely made. Take care.
    1
  37.  @budalaidiotska6947  The player himself has admitted that he chose not to self-isolate when he knew that he was Covid-19 positive. He has admitted that he travelled and met people while he was Covid-19 positive and never informed or warned anybody that he met that he had the virus! How many people did he put at risk by his actions? Are these the actions of a decent, honest, trustworthy person? Did he not put his own pursuits ahead of other peoples rights, health & freedoms? Take care & speak truth.
    1
  38.  @budalaidiotska6947  Yes I have read his statement in which he admitted to not self-isolating when he knew that he was Covid-19 positive. He also admitted to meeting people and giving interviews while he knew that he was Covid-19 positive and that he knew that he shouldn't. In his statement he also admitted giving incorrect information on his visa application. There is no indication in his statement whatsoever that he informed the many people that he met and engaged with that he was infected with the virus. His statement does not mention his trip to Spain in any way or that he that he presented a negative PCR test on entering the country. So bi, the question is have you actually read his statement? Take care & speak truth.
    1
  39.  @budalaidiotska6947  More total obfuscation. The player has admitted (in his Instagram statement) that he met people and gave interviews when he knew that he was Covid-19 positive,. He has admitted that he did not self-isolate despite knowing that he was Covid-19 positive. He has admitted that he gave incorrect travel information on his visa application and by implication he has admitted that he undertook international travel while he knew that he was Covid-19 positive. At least he is man enough to fully accept the verdict of the Australian Federal Court. Take care & speak truth.
    1
  40.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Hi, if you can please put your comment into a more understandable form then I will do my best to give you an answer. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  41.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Hi again. Thank you for your reply. To be honest your latest post does not seem to link with your original comment and it is also difficult to understand as it moves from topic to topic in rapid succession. That said, perhaps it may help to point out the fact that the "they" in "They granted and exemption did they not ? " and the "they" that removed his visa and deported him from the country were not, in fact, the same "they".. Hopefully this will sort out your confusion. Take care.
    1
  42.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Again thank you for the reply. I am not trying to be argumentative in any way. The tennis player was granted an exemption by Tennis Australia. His visa was revoked by the Australian Government (or elements of) and this was upheld by The Federal Court. The text that you quote comes from a statement released by Tennis Australia, not from the Australian Government. As is clear from this text the exemption was granted by Tennis Australia who employed medical experts to see if it met the Australian Government guidelines. The medical panel seemed to think that it did, the Australian Government didn't. In short Tennis Australia granted the playing exemption, Australian Government denied the visa. Two different organisations as your text makes clear. Take care.
    1
  43.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  The organisation Tennis Australia granted the tennis player a playing exemption, the Australian Government withdrew his visa to stay in the country. I am sure that you can understand that these are 2 different entities. Also, is there any particular reason that you choose not to be polite and civil? Take care & speak truth.
    1
  44. ​ @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Hi again, thank you for your latest comment. No the player was granted a medical exemption to compete in the Australian Open by Tennis Australia although they did seek the advice from 2 panels of medical experts "one of those was the Independent Medical Exemption Review Panel appointed by the Victorian Department of Health" so I do genuinely see where your confusion comes from. The letter of medical exemption granted by Tennis Australia was produce in evidence by the player as part of his legal proceedings and can easily be found on the website of The Federal Court of Australia in the files released for Djokovicv V Minister for Immigration in the file named Affidavit of Natalie Bannister. In this PDF as part of attachment E you will find the official medical exemption as granted by Tennis Australia, on Tennis Australia headed notepaper and signed by Dr Carolyn Broderick, the Chief Medical Officer of Tennis Australia. I will attempt to post a link to this document below. Take care & do research.
    1
  45.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Cheers again. While it is most interesting to get the legal opinion of a tennis player please forgive me if I stick with the opinion of the Serbian tennis player, his legal team, the documents that they submitted to the Australian Federal Court and the writing, heading and signature on that document (which is easily available to the public). You of course, are free to believe whatever you want to. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  46.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  That's find, no worries. I do not recall you presenting or directing me to any documents, but if you think that you did then that is fine by me. I will stick with the documents that are on public view on the website of the Australian Federal Court which refers to the letter as the exemption letter from Tennis Australia, states that the exemption was given by Tennis Australia, is written on Tennis Australia's headed notepaper and is signed by Tennis Australia''s Chief Medical Officer. If you consider that this means something else and wish to argue about it then that is fine by me. Take care.
    1
  47.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  I will leave this, as the last word, to you. Take care & stay safe.
    1
  48.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  Whatever you mind convinces you that is correct. I still stick with facts.
    1
  49.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  If that's what you think you have done then that is fine by me! Take care...seriously, ...take care.
    1
  50.  @whatsgoodmyguy4391  VICTORIA...did not grant the vaccine exemption, the court documents conclusively prove that it was Tennis Australia. I have referred you to the exact set of documents on the Australian Federal Court website as submitted by the player himself. You are free to hold any opinion that you want but reality is reality, facts are facts. Take care.
    1