Comments by "The Outhwaite3" (@theouthwaite3385) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

its legal in minnesota. thats the point. whether or not someone chooses to do it is another question.
3
again, wrong. please elaborate on your life saving procedures point.
3
frequency isnt the point. nobody said that. its about whether it should be legal at nine months, which it is in minnesota for example
2
@angelarox3969 how are they lying?
2
maybe. have you seen the laws in minnesota? no restrictions on gestation.
2
she lost me at martha moxley. people that know more than her disagree.
2
@angelarox3969 i'm sorry, but that's the law in Minnesota. no restrictions , be it gestation, fetal viability, or health of the mother. you could abort at nine months in Minnesota.
2
@angelarox3969 i'm not following what you are saying at all. you keep claiming that its sick that other people are claiming that abortions are legal at nine months. i'm telling you that is exactly the law in minnesota. if you think its sick, take it up with minnesota. dont shoot the messenger.
2
incorrect. this is legal in Minnesota as of 2023. walz passed it. no restriction including viability and gestation
2
@NoName-gv6nm also third trimester abortions are legal in nine states and DC. minnesota just has the least restrictions which is to say none.
2
true. but it does also expose that she appears to be in favor of an extreme position. effective questioning by cruz, who i dont particularly like.
1
@promethiac2641 what if its not to save the mothers life
1
@horncow4160 legally they can in minnesota
1
@promethiac2641 so youre ok if a woman decides to have an abortion at 8 months, three weeks and 6 days- hours away from childbirth - because the baby may be neglected?
1
@promethiac2641 isn't that just a wee bit of a generalization? wouldnt childless people be more likely to be narcissists since they have nobody to be responsible or sacrifice for?
1
@promethiac2641 why do you think life is abusive and oppressive? doesnt that depend on whos life you are talking about? of course not everyone has the same lived experience. if nobody had kids civilization would die out. however i do believe that some people clearly should not have kids.
1
but at nine months? thats the question
1
@tntina420 the point is should a person legally be allowed to terminate a viable fetus at nine months.
1
@tntina420 so abortion should be legal at nine months? ok
1
@angelarox3969 youre contradicting yourself. your claim was that it was "sick' that people think woman are aborting fetus's at nine months. then you acknowledge that the law allows for this which is exactly what my point was. which is it?
1
in minnesota there are no restrictions on abortion. even nine months.
1
@bulletanarchy there are no restrictions as in gestation, fetal viability or the health of the mother. she can choose to abort at nine months in other words.
1
@bulletanarchy i'm not sure what you are trying to articulate there are no restriction in Minnesota.
1
@bulletanarchy 'such things tend to only occur when there is a reason.' 1) what about the times when there's not a reason? 2) then why take out the 'reason' out of the bill- gestation, fetal viability or health of the mother- which are in almost every other states regulations? because as of now, there are no 'reasons' necessary in Minnesota?.
1
@bulletanarchy so the answer to my first question was ,' you dont need a reason'? or, to put it another way, 'since pregnancy is always risky to some extent, you should be able to have an abortion at nine months because something could always go wrong even if everything looks normal'?
1
@bulletanarchy also, what is the 'risk' all pregnancies have?
1
@bulletanarchy great. so put a health of the mother clause in the regulations. like almost every other state in the union. problem solved.
1
why is it time wasting?
1
@safinanamujju6105 oh i agree. i didnt know what you meant by time wasting. btw this is legal in minnesota as of 2023-abortion at nine months with no restrictions, that is.
1
@PatientPerspective you mean angela? it is true that there are no restrictions on third trimester abortions. even very liberal states have had restriction on gestation, fetal viability, and mothers health. walz took all of that away last year . also he took away the Drs responsibility to save the babys (at this point, when its out of the mothers body, its s baby i think we'd all agree) life in the case of a botched abortion.
1
@angelarox3969 i trust doctors more than politicians as well. you'll get no argument from me there. but what did you mean by your last sentence? "We need laws restricting politicians from framing opinions as facts without having any knowledge." whats an example of that?
1