Comments by "The Outhwaite3" (@theouthwaite3385) on "John Anderson Media" channel.

ive long lost patience for criticism of israels actions in response to the attack without anything resembling a better response
13
@victorygarden556 what does the charter of hamas say they want to do to the jews?
10
@everythingandmore5537 there is no Palestine. i think you mean gaza, which was left to the Palestinians almost 20 years ago. israel pulled very Jewish person from there in 05, leaving them to do what they want wtih the land. they elected hamas, a group that has in its charter the obliteration of israel and the jews. they then launched thousands of rockets into israel, so israel blockaded gaza, as anyone would.
8
@DR.Abdulallah bro. stop.
6
@WhyDoYouGossip incorrect. the doctrines are very different. if only there was a place to read about it.
6
@DR.Abdulallah aisha reference got deleted by youtube. weird
4
@mohamedali2858 difference being, that's where israel is, nobody has to move anywhere, let alone be 'obliterated'. slight difference. While youre at it, what does the charter of hamas say they want to do to the jews?
4
@DR.Abdulallah the penalty for apostasy
3
@DR.Abdulallah the penalty for blasphemy
3
@DR.Abdulallah justification for jihad
3
@DR.Abdulallah martydom
3
@DR.Abdulallah let me know when i get to the peaceful parts.
3
@ZT-vr4wz it is not like every other religion. id read about it
3
@goldencalf5144 it could be, of gaza was occupied and Israel was an apartheid state. but its not.
1
@c0ldfury 1200 civilians targeted and killed and 250 hostages taken? when? btw there is no Palestine.
1
@syesoleimani1403 1- cite the specific part you are referencing. 2- incorrect. article 7- the rocks and trees- where does that come from?
1
@mspentest can you give a specific example of what you disagree with rather than saying the person was immature?
1
@DR.Abdulallah if you leave out the violent parts, its mostly peaceful. the penalty for apostasy and blasphemy , the justification of jihad, child (single digit) marriage, concubinage aka sx slvry. for starters. . sorry. thats not peaceful .
1
@DR.Abdulallah concubinage aka sx slvs (see shabir ally)
1
@DR.Abdulallah child marriage (single digits)
1
@seanvance1933 good point. thanks. mostly peaceful , besides that stuff.
1
 @Arctic117 your book is why its not a peaceful religion
1
@Arctic117 bro, the violence is IN the book, among other sources
1
@Arctic117 assuming you're serious. scroll up. i listed a bunch of examples. unless you have a different definition of 'peaceful' that is not peaceful. nor was your 'prophet'.
1
@Arctic117 scroll up for some examples. youtube is deleting comments so its unlikely i'll be able to say much.
1
@Arctic117 i think once you start justifying things like relations with n9ne yr old females with 50 yr old men, its time to reevaluate the claims. but do go on.
1
@Arctic117 in my opinion, once you start justifying things like the age of aisha, or unaliving folks for criticism, it might be time to reevaluate the whole system, or at least the individual making the claims.
1
@nunya54 1- perhaps you define 'blasphemy' differently than everyone else. 2- you are presuming this man is of God. most would say the fact that he banged a nine year old rules out that possibility. if he said 8 was ok, you d believe that too.
1
@nunya54 blasphemy. its punishable by death in many countries with this belief system. i listed a bunch of other questionable ideas above. you are presuming god said relations with 9 year olds is ok as opposed to questioning if this is of god in the first place. that idea alone leads most people to respond with a no
1
@nunya54 yt is deleting replies again. of course.
1
@nunya54 if you think god ordained relations with n9nie year old girls, its time to reevaluate.
1
@nunya54 if you think you should unalive people for apostasy or blasphemy, you should reevaluate.
1
@nunya54 if you think the practice of sx slvry is of god, you should reevaluate.
1
@nunya54 what is the definition and penalty for blasphemy
1
@nunya54 if you think the age of aisha was appropriate, its time to reevaluate.
1
@nunya54 name me one other person who can have relations with a girl that age and you would say its ok.
1
@khizLad incorrect. that is revisionist history. there is no evidence that it was normal for pre pubescent nine year olds who were still playing with dolls to get married. but people will claim this in order to justify the behavior.
1
@khizLad no i dont. tell that to salman rushdie. there is a penalty for apostasy and blasphemy according to every major school of islamic jurisprudence. what is it?
1
@khizLad i'm aware of this story. and it has nothing to do with my point which you still havent addressed. the penalty is death, you must know this but you refuse to say so. and you are defending a guy who had relations with a child by believing the propaganada about that being commonplace, ignoring where she was playing with dolls or the rulings about marrying and having relations with girls who have not yet had their cycles. how about the stories about the founder taking the wives of J's he'd just unalived as concubines and wives? didnt read those? i'd read reliance of the traveller for starters and stop being an apologist for a violent, monstrous belief system.
1
@khizLad i'm quite familiar. one story where the founder of the religion of peace let a guy go does not negate the fact that he called for the unaliving of critics at other times. it also does not negate the fact that this is the official position according to every school of islamic jurisprudence. charlie hebdo, theo van gogh, salman rushdie, all attacked because of this doctrine.
1
@WhyDoYouGossip nope. this religion is definitely not like every other religion. the penalty for apostasy, blasphemy, the idea of concubinage aka sx slvry, child marriage, jihad, etc.
1
@ZT-vr4wz no
1
@kilors206 what does the charter of Hamas say they want to do to the jews?
1
@kilors206 what does the charter of hamas say they want to do to the jews?
1