Comments by "Álvaro" (@alvaro701) on "Russian Assault Units Have Entered BAKHMUT!" video.

@MrGolov-te5eb We clearly don't agree on the amount of material and people lost by Russia in Kharkov. In material only you can check Oryx to see how much was lost on those days. Also, Kharkov front collapsed in a very unexpected and quick way, the rule of the atacker dying more doesn't count when your enemy is being completly overrun.
3
There is a huge amount of coping from prorusians in this comment section lol
3
@educatedcanadian7408 If you're Russian you should be very worried because conscription is for everyone.
1
@MrGolov-te5eb That's quite wrong. Kharkov was a disaster, Russialst thousands of soldiers trying to defend It at all cost (they didnt flee until It was quite late, all of that gesture of goodwill and such is propaganda) and in Bakhmut casualties are super high for sure, but everything makes us thing that russians are loosing much more troops dude.
1
@ninjastriker6761 Dude everything makes us thing that russians have more casualties than ukrainians and you saying that the ratio is 1:10 for Russia, that's wild and fake. And btw if we need money we just need to take the 350 billions $ from Russia freezed on the west. Didnt you know that? All of this can be paid by Russia lol
1
@ninjastriker6761 what are your thoughts about the nazis fighting for Russia, like Wagner and Rusich?
1
@MrGolov-te5eb Dude how It is possible that Russia lost less men defending Kharkov when the front collapsed and they were trying to defend their positions until the end lol
1
@markobucevic8991 Russia was trying everything to hold to Kharkov. They didnt pull out without losses when they were trying to defend it until got almost encircled. They sent they best units and they got decimated.
1
@MrGolov-te5eb I dont know the exact numbers but they were throwing there everything they could.
1
@markobucevic8991 How can they fail if the russians are out of Kherson (anexed territory) and out of Kharkov?
1
@markobucevic8991 Sure mate. They lost all offensives but somehow Russia needed to flee the city. Do you even follow any map with the advance of each side since the start of the war? Didnt you notice and steady advance towards the city in the previous months? Kherson has been an entire campaign that has lasted months, and little by little the russians controled less and less territory on the east bank which combined with an increasing decay on logistics (hello HIMARS) made the Russian position indefendible on the long run. It has been a battle of atrittion with many casualties on the ukrainian side, yes, but from time to time you need to just suck the shit and keep going in to reach your target, which is pretty clear in this case, capturing back Kherson. It's quite a defeat for Russia because they have left to the ukrainians the most important city taken so far, with more than a 100.000 civilians still there btw (by Russian figures). Russian territory is supposed to be sacred to the Kremlin right? Now they have left a city in the hands of supposed neonazis. How can they explain that? And this is still a "SPO", so Putin's threats fall empty. They even blowed the bridges up in case the ukrainians came after them. I wonder if Melitopol, Mariupol, and who knows even Crimea is as sacred as Kherson. Time will tell I guess.
1
@ninjastriker6761 Dont you get tired of being wrong?
1
@Mortablunt It's insane that you think Russia lost 6k for 100k of the ukrainians.
1
@Cod3es. There are many cases where Russian generals appears in videos calling his own soldiers cannon fodder. Even in Russian Today there are articles criticizing the officers for treating conscripts as cannon fodder.
1
@mudboy9762 All the mobilized are conscripts. And most likely they many more than 300k. On the conscripting order It doesn't say anything about 300k.
1
@zallyzally2698 That's not true. In Kharkov they tried as hard as possible to stop the ukrainians, and in many cases they have defended positions and towns to the point of almost getting completly encircled, which means they need to run and leave everything heavy behind while shells are raining. Also Bakhmut is being taking by frontal charges.
1
@theorncampbell4432 Conscripts armed with bolt rifles and IWW equipment is more of a russian thing.
1
@epoxy1710 Guys you shouldnt take russian propaganda at face value. Or at least consume the one produced in Russia, it doesn't have the insane claims you're taking here at least.
1
@redarmy1778 Russia is bombing civilian infraestructure in order to make them to surrender. Is horrible and stupid that Russia is using the argument of "nato did the same in Yugoslavia" when they are bombing ukrainians, not NATO. Also, Putin said that NATO bombings in Yugoslavia were inhumane, so that means this bombing campaign is the same! Russian propaganda can be very stupid.
1
@epoxy1710 Dude most of the Russian forces were deployed already in february. Now they are sending conscripts to the fray. Conscripts, first time for Russia since 1941.
1
@redarmy1778 No, actually Russia dont have anything more apart of nukes.
1
@epoxy1710 your numbers are completly wrong. Many people think like you but come on, if that's true (which is not) then why Russia is conscripting people on the street? You know what? The wikipedia numbers are right. Russia sent most of his trainer soldiers on february
1
@epoxy1710 it's just wrong no matter how many times you repeat It. Most trained infantry was already deployed in february. The reserve was called many months ago. Now they are sending conscripts.
1
@epoxy1710 you're just a troll or plainly ignorant. Go back to wikipedia. Plot twist: wikipedia numbers are more or less correct.
1
@epoxy1710 If Russia has so many soldiers why they are sending conscripts?
1
@redarmy1778 NATO is not running out of weapons or ammo, that's just myth. It's the biggest military alliance nowadays, with a much bigger military industry than Russia. Actually I would say that seen the videos and the Russian news about the lack of equipment and training for russian conscripts Russia is struggling a lot on that sense. And that's without talking much about their lack of high precision missiles for close air support and such.
1
@redarmy1778 Keep thinking that if you wish
1