Comments by "Ante Bratinčević" (@antebratincevic6764) on "Anders Puck Nielsen"
channel.
-
32
-
22
-
18
-
9
-
You lie. The Yugoslav army did not serve for 18 months, but 12 + 3. The arms embargo on the import of weapons was valid for all the republics of the former Yugoslavia, with the fact that Serbia was the most armed because most of the weapons of the Yugoslav army ended up in the hands of Serbs.
It was NATO that implemented the arms embargo favoring Serbia, which took over most of the arms of the Yugoslav Army.
The war in the territory of the former Yugoslavia cannot be compared with the current war in Ukraine, which is a communist creation, just like Yugoslavia was, and since 2014, Ukraine no longer exists, just like Yugoslavia ceased to exist in 1991.
In the early 1980s, I served in the Yugoslav army and in the early 1990s I fought in the Croatian army and I saw all kinds of things. Not about that now.
And if you're going to see what bombing with democratic bombs looks like, look at what Iraq's Fallujah and Syria's Raqqa looked like.
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@adamderbent6986 You continue to blatantly manipulate using half-truths that are more effective for manipulation than active lies.
You referred to the Soviet style of killing civilians. First there are no Soviets now, Russians are not Soviets as you are not Yugoslav.
Second, I mentioned Falluja and Raqqa as a style of killing civilians because you wrote that the Soviets have their way of mass killing people. American's style in killing civilians is a way more effective then Sovit's style.
If there were civilian casualties from Russian missiles, it was due to the actions of the NATO proxy anti-aircraft defense. In addition, in the last week, more civilians were killed in Donetsk, Gorlovka and Belgorod than in the territory controlled by the NATO proxy.
Since 2014, more than 800 children have been killed in the Donbas region alone by the bombing of the Ukrainian army.
There were elements of aggression and civil war in Croatia, because you cannot talk about aggression if people whose families have lived in the same city for hundreds of years go to war. If you are going to talk about aggression, then Croatia also committed aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina because Croatian army from Croatia, cities and villages hundreds of kilometers away were killing native Serbs in the villages of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Now is neither the time nor the place to talk about the causes of the war in the former Yugoslavia. Simply put, the Serbs in Croatia demanded veto rights under the 1974 constitution, and the Croats demanded the borders of the Republic of Croatia under the same constitution. Not about that now.
The West under the leadership of the Americans at the beginning of the war supported Yugoslavia with Serbian domination until Croatia collapsed economically in 1994 and then Tuđman privatized all public banks and handed over the Croatian National Bank to the global mafia and Croatia and Croats have been debt slaves ever since. All this so that the liberation of Croatia from America would be politically, informationally, logistically and financially supported.
For example, the Americans stole the Ukrainian Central Bank from the Ukrainians in 2014. The day after the coup in Ukraine in 2014, all the gold was taken from the Ukrainian Central Bank.
Hollande and Merkel publicly stated that the Minsk peace accords were never intended to be implemented and that it was merely buying time for Ukraine to arm itself.
You don't live in reality because you don't understand that Ukraine is not Croatia, nor Serbia is not Russia.
And finally, every country has the right to defend itself, but Ukraine as a country no longer exists, as does Yugoslavia. These are facts, no matter how long you live in the illusion. Some still think that Yugoslavia will be resurrected.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Orcram As I wrote, difference in empires are not so important.
I live in Croatia, a country whose soldiers fought for others three times in the last 200 years (Napoleon, Habsburgs Empire, Hitler) and left bones all over Russia, without Russian soldiers ever attacking Croatia.
After Croatia joined NATO and the EU, Croatia lost 10% of its population, this did not happen even during the war in the early 1990s.
Today, after Lithuania, Croatia is the country that has lost the most inhabitants due to emigration and declining birth rates after joining the EU.
And now when I see someone talking about the collapse of Russia, I get an allergic rash.
In 2022, Croatia entered the Eurozone, that is, it introduced the Euro, and everything became more expensive, that is, inflation gained momentum.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tcavuzic If you want, every war has similarities.
Ukraine may have had some sovereignty, but that sovereignty disappeared with the 2014 coup and part of the Ukrainian citizens simply did not want to recognize that illegal and illegitimate government. With the unconstitutional overthrow of Yanukovych, Ukraine ceased to exist as a legal entity. No one can deny the fact that the Ukrainian Central Bank was hijacked from Ukraine in 2014 and all the gold was taken away. The Russians didn't do that. Sorry. That was the end of any trace of Ukraine's sovereignty, and since then Ukraine has been a vassal of the West.
As for Yugoslavia, there was also a problem of the constitution. I'm not judging, I'm just stating the facts. The constitution of any country is not an e-shop so that it can be put in the basket of things as desired.
Yugoslavia was an internationally recognized country and used the army to protect its borders, I don't think it should have been like that, but Ukraine did the same with the difference that it was done in Ukraine by an unconstitutionally brought government.
And I react to half-truths such as the West supporting only Croatia, that is not true, NATO was the executor of the ban on importing weapons to Croatia while Serbia was armed to the teeth. In addition, a lot of weapons came from Russia, which does not agree with the thesis that Russians and Serbs are the same.
I have only presented the deliberately hidden facts that change the view of the overall picture.
No one can tell me that Serbia and Russia are the same and that is exactly what led to this war.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2