Comments by "Ante Bratinčević" (@antebratincevic6764) on "History Hustle"
channel.
-
7
-
7
-
5
-
@HistoryHustle I am Croat from Split and I don't care where you are from, but I do not allow the history of my city, where I have lived for 60 years, to be written by someone from the outside. Regardless of whether they were Turks, Serbs, Austrians, Hungarians, Italians, Germans, French, English, Americans. That is impossible without a good knowledge of the Croatian or Serbian languages, which are almost the same. For 60 years I have been walking among the walls from which each stone tells its own story.
This war zone is nothing compared to the topic of the war during the breakup of Yugoslavia. Just then everyone would go completely crazy.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ivanhus3852 I live in the Mediterranean, the Balkans and southern Europe, just as, for example, Swedes live in the Baltics, the Scandinavia and Northern Europe.
Don't bullshiting.
As a Mediterranean, Greeks, Montenegrins, and Italians in mentality are closer to me than Continentals, regardless of whether they are Slovenians, Croats or Serbs.
2
-
2
-
@croatianhistoryandidentity8261 Cyrillic is a derivation of Glagolitic. Everyone can easily see it. This transition took place in the last phase of early Christianity, that is, a little before the 11th century, when the church schism occurred.
You skipped no less than 800 years and reached the Serbian reformers in the 19th century.
After the church split, the Vatican under his authority allowed the use of the language of the time, which the Croats called Croatian, the Serbs Serbian, and in fact the same language, in the Catholic part.
The Vatican's condition was that masses be celebrated in Latin and that the official script become Latin. Then intensive work on languages began, both among Catholics and among Orthodox, who continued to modify the common language and kept the common Cyrillic alphabet.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1