Comments by "Ante Bratinčević" (@antebratincevic6764) on "History Hustle" channel.

After reading part of the comments, I can conclude that there is a great distortion of history from all sides. History is not a supermarket where items are selected as needed.
7
Serbs, Croats and Slovenians entered the joint state of SHS with a fig in their pocket (second thoughts). Croats did not have a state and this was a way to partially get it. Slovenians also did not have a state, so this was a way for them to get one. The Serbs had a state and it was a way for all Serbs to live in one state, that is, for Serbs from Serbia to be in the same state with Serbs from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia.
7
The 19th century was also interesting, and the 21st doesn't look boring either. Three times in the last 200 years, Croatian soldiers left bones in Russia, fighting for others. In the 19th century for Napoleon, in the 20th century for the Habsburgs and Hitler, and now Croatian soldiers are in Lithuania and part of NATO on the border of Belarus, waiting to see if they will fertilize the Russian land for the fourth time. Very interesting . . . :)
5
@HistoryHustle I am Croat from Split and I don't care where you are from, but I do not allow the history of my city, where I have lived for 60 years, to be written by someone from the outside. Regardless of whether they were Turks, Serbs, Austrians, Hungarians, Italians, Germans, French, English, Americans. That is impossible without a good knowledge of the Croatian or Serbian languages, which are almost the same. For 60 years I have been walking among the walls from which each stone tells its own story. This war zone is nothing compared to the topic of the war during the breakup of Yugoslavia. Just then everyone would go completely crazy.
4
@bolner3468 I do not care where graves of Serbian Kings are. I am living in Split and I never did hear or did see graves in Solin. I was in the Museum of Croatian Archeological Monuments in Split and there is nothing about graves in Solin and there is some stons on which is on latin lungage writen sometging about Branimir about Croatian historians are disagree is he was King or not, but there is no grave there. For me it is more probably since there were no Kings, they were various characters, vassals of the surrounding empires and powerful people. It is the same as if in 1000 years Mile Martić was taken as the president of the Republic of Serbian Krajina and it would be as proof of the existence of the Serbian state in Croatia, which was recognized by Slobodan Milošević and the Serbian Patriarch. Ostavi se ćoravoga posla.
4
My grand grand father was in Austrian Navy for 10 years and he spent more than 5 years in Alexandria. He was a gendarme in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, which capitulated in 1941, and he was killed in 1944 by the Ustaše in Unešić, near Split in Croatia.
3
@bozidarpetrovic7823 Općepoznato je da je za vrime Italije u WWII dosta ljudi iz Dalmacije finilo u talijanke pržune. Svi su rekli kako su talijanski pržuni bili puno humaniji nego njemački, ustaški i posli partizanski.
3
Croats and Serbs have a common origin and come from the same people. They used the same script (Glagolitic and Cyrillic) and spoke the same language. Since the church schism in the 11th century, Croats Catholics and Serbs Ortodox than learned different history, wrote in different scripts, listened to different news, had their own legends and heroes, etc., even in villages one kilometer apart in an area of overlap of several hundred kilometers from west to east of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is astonishing that even after 1000 years of unnatural separation, they remained very similar, almost the same people.
3
You preach false history. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo 1914 was the TRIGGER, not the CAUSE, of the start of WWI. Everything was already ready for war, and the reasons are well known.
3
There are lot of men with same name and surname. It was only one Ante Pavelić, born in Klobuk, Herzegovina, who did establish NDH 10.04.1941. supportred by the Hitler's third reich.
3
@ivanhus3852 I live in the Mediterranean, the Balkans and southern Europe, just as, for example, Swedes live in the Baltics, the Scandinavia and Northern Europe. Don't bullshiting. As a Mediterranean, Greeks, Montenegrins, and Italians in mentality are closer to me than Continentals, regardless of whether they are Slovenians, Croats or Serbs.
2
@danebajrovic8021 Možda je to tebi interesantno, ali to je bija jeadan od obrazaca u Dalmaciji za vrime WWII. Priča o moga dida bi ti sigurno bila interesantnija od ove. Još 1994 meni je did govorija kako je ovo njemu šesta bandira, rođen je pod austrijskon, pa kraljevina Jugoslavija, pa Italija, pa NDH, pa komunistička Jugoslavija, pa Hrvatska i on mi je reka kako je svaka sljedeća bila gora od predhodne i da će doći jedna još gora na šta sam mu se ja smija, ali dobro je govorija, ova EU je definitivno gora od svih predhodnih . . . :)
2
@croatianhistoryandidentity8261 Cyrillic is a derivation of Glagolitic. Everyone can easily see it. This transition took place in the last phase of early Christianity, that is, a little before the 11th century, when the church schism occurred. You skipped no less than 800 years and reached the Serbian reformers in the 19th century. After the church split, the Vatican under his authority allowed the use of the language of the time, which the Croats called Croatian, the Serbs Serbian, and in fact the same language, in the Catholic part. The Vatican's condition was that masses be celebrated in Latin and that the official script become Latin. Then intensive work on languages began, both among Catholics and among Orthodox, who continued to modify the common language and kept the common Cyrillic alphabet.
2
@ChuckNorris-eq2ce You write half-truths, and half-truths are the basis of any manipulation. It is true that the Serbs left Croatia, but that was only part of the agreement between Tuđman and Milošević on population exchange, so the Croats from Republika Srpska went to Croatia. This was also confirmed in the peace agreement from Dayton, where the so-called peaceful reintegration of Eastern Slavonia was agreed upon, for which the Croats had to give up Herceg Bosnia or the third entity and were left without it. The causes of the breakup of Yugoslavia are complex and have their roots in the very creation of Yugoslavia, so it cannot be described in two sentences.
2
@HistoryHustle The words POVOD and UZROK in in the Croatian language they are not synonyms . If you and I are ready for a duel over a woman and we both have guns, then the TRIGGER is certainly not the CAUSE of the duel, but the woman for whom we entered the duel. These are not trivial things when it comes to the historical context, because the way you interpret it, it turns out that if Gavrilo Princip had not shot Franz Ferdinand, WWI would not have happened. I do not buy that interpretation. Sorry.
2
@TheSouth-j7f Yes, I mix with his Minister of Internala Affairs Andrija Artuković, he was from Klobuk. Bu head of NDH Ante Pavelić was one and only.
2
@chrishanzek8930 I am 60 years old from Split. I was in all museum s in Split, I know all Dalmatia very well and I never did see that flag in my life. And you leraning history on Wikipedia and now you want to teach me about the flag of Dalmatia when at the time of the Kingdom of Dalmatia only a coat of arms with three lions, which some say are leopards, was used. Wikipedia is not a relevant historical source, it is a generator of war.
1
@dzonikg Dubrovnik nije bio hrvatski, a ni srpski nego od ljudi koji su tu živili. Kad je Dubrovnik postao grad država Raguzani (stanovnici Dubrovačke Republike) su dopustili da ih Vatikan pretvori većinski u katolike opet iz oportunističkih razloga. Samo ime Dubrovnik dolazi od vrste hrasta koja se zove dub šta je staroslavenska riječ koja se koristila i koristi u Dalmaciji i srednjoj Srbiji di ima dosta toponima ka šta su Dubrava, Dubrave, Dubci, Dubravice, Dubovica itd.
1
@putinwillhanginthemiddleof4866 Many Serbs from Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Ottoman Empire came to Croatia, where they were on the front line for the benefits that the Austrian Empire gave them to defend Austrian Empire from the Otomans. That belt between the two empires was called Krajina. It was a classic manipulation of the Austrian Empire and it is clear that the Croats were jealous of the Serbs whom the Austrians brought and gave them money, land and other benefits. It only says who was the boss and that the Croats were not asked much, i.e. they were not equal to the Austrians and Hungarians or even to the Serbs who were appointed by the Austrian Empire to defend the borders of Empire.
1
@hunthunt9268 You're pretending to be silly. You are manipulating because only half the truth is that the Croats won. This is true for Croatia, but not for BiH. In BiH, the Serbs got the Republika Srpska as a separate entity from which the Croats were expelled as Serbs from Croatia. Croats lost their entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina and are now a minority in an entity called the Federation.
1
Was by the origin than he change for benefits as many Croats and Serbs in Bosnia who become Muslims during the Otoman Empire and they are Bošnjak now. That is way Empires work.
1
@ivanhus3852 Do not bullshit. Uzelac is a typical Serbian surname. No doubt about that. He fought for those who paid him. Plain & Simple.
1
@PERUN385 And Milan is old Croatian name . . . Sorry, I was not born yesterday morning . . . :)
1
@HistoryHustle Neutrally written in English it would look like this; The assassination in Sarajevo was the trigger of the first world war.
1
@chrishanzek8930 Yes, block the history . . . and we all may go to wikipediahahaha . . . :)
1
@PERUN385 There were many early Christian churches, such as the church of Sveti Jure on Putalj above Kaštel Sućurac. There are probably older churches, but those Catholic churches were built on the foundations of early Christian churches, which is a secret. Currently, there is a dispute about the early Christian church known as the Church of the Sveti Spas from ninth century in Cetina, the Orthodox claim that it is Orthodox, and the Catholics that it is Catholic, but until the 11th century they were all only Christian churches, or as they are called today, early Christian churches. Big part of thel history is falsified and it is folly to believe the Vatican and Constantinople.
1
@mladenmatosevic4591 There were not in continuity Dubrovnik, Dalmatia and Istra. Dubrovnik was republic and Istra and Dalmatia were under the rule of Venice. By claiming this, you admit that Istria, Dalmatia and Dubrovnik are not Croatian.
1
@TheSouth-j7f Yes. I did mix with his Internal Minister Andrija Artuković. Anyhow Ante Pavelić the head of NDH is one and only.
1
@gottmituns813 Yes, we have only names but not bones and graves of the Kings . . . I have a bridge to sell you . . . :)
1
@user-nm1gz6cm7h Šta ti meni pišeš o grobovima . . . o grobovima di su i jesu li lipo se dogovori sa komentatorom pod oznakom @bolner3468
1