Youtube comments of Ante Bratinčević (@antebratincevic6764).
-
163
-
137
-
93
-
86
-
84
-
60
-
59
-
46
-
41
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
30
-
26
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
You, as a Brit, have nothing to apologize for, but you should learn the history of WWII and how it ended.
There are some facts that are easily verifiable, namely Nazism and the victory over Nazism achieved by the Western Allies and the USSR. After the victory over Nazism in 1945, a trial was organized in Nurnberg, Germany, but only a few dozen Nazis were convicted, and over a thousand Nazi officers and scientists were transferred across the Atlantic in Operation Paperclip. It was these Nazis who were the core of newly founded organizations such as the CIA and NATO, which kept the flame of Nazism alive both in Ukraine and in the US and Canada among Ukrainian emigration.
For example, the fact that Nazi officer Kurt Waldheim became the Secretary General of the United Nations in the 1970s is also verifiable.
With the demolition of the Berlin Wall, those Nazis used it under the guise of democracy to destroy the Ukrainian state, first by attempting a color revolution in 2004, which failed, but succeeded in 2014, when the Ukrainian Nazis took over power and the persecution of Russians in Ukraine began, which culminated in the burning of a building in Odesa on May 2. in 2014 in which 50 Russians were killed who protested against the coup d'état, i.e. the unconstitutional change of government aka regime change.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
@mir-jan3496 You are oversimplifying things, it is impossible to talk about Serbia, Croatia and others outside the context of the creation and dissolution of Yugoslavia. Don't forget how America supported Yugoslavia and Serbia from 1990 to 1994 by imposing an arms embargo on everyone when only Serbs were armed. Croatia fell in 1994, and Serbia in 2000. NATO is in Serbia and moves freely in Serbia, although Serbia is not formally a member of NATO. We have all fallen for the fraud of democracy and we have all been robbed. Today, the situation is such that the evil globalist forces are supported by a little less than half of the Serbs and a little more than half of the Croats. In addition to being divided on a national basis, we are also divided on an ideological basis within nations. I can say that Serbia is somewhat closer to justice in this global conflict than Croatia, but Serbia is economically, morally, spiritually, demographically and in all other ways devastated by global evil just like Croatia. There is no difference.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
You lie. The Yugoslav army did not serve for 18 months, but 12 + 3. The arms embargo on the import of weapons was valid for all the republics of the former Yugoslavia, with the fact that Serbia was the most armed because most of the weapons of the Yugoslav army ended up in the hands of Serbs.
It was NATO that implemented the arms embargo favoring Serbia, which took over most of the arms of the Yugoslav Army.
The war in the territory of the former Yugoslavia cannot be compared with the current war in Ukraine, which is a communist creation, just like Yugoslavia was, and since 2014, Ukraine no longer exists, just like Yugoslavia ceased to exist in 1991.
In the early 1980s, I served in the Yugoslav army and in the early 1990s I fought in the Croatian army and I saw all kinds of things. Not about that now.
And if you're going to see what bombing with democratic bombs looks like, look at what Iraq's Fallujah and Syria's Raqqa looked like.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
@mattkemp2162 When the war in Yugoslavia began, the Yugoslav People's Army was the army of the internationally recognized state of Yugoslavia, which the West publicly supported and secretly undermined.
There are various implications of the beginning of the conflict in Yugoslavia, such as the disrespect of the Constitution of Yugoslavia, from which all republics took what suited them and rejected what did not suit them.
What Slobodan Milošević asked for in federative Yugoslavia, one man one vote and everyone else refused, in BiH, for example, Croats and Muslims applied and outvoted the Serbs in the referendum for secession.
Croatia demanded the borders it had under the Yugoslav Constitution, but denied the rights of the Serbs in Croatia as a constituent nation under the same Yugoslav Constitution.
It's too complicated for you and it's better not to mess with it.
What Yugoslavia/Serbia did in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina was motivated by the NATO pact which introduced and implemented an embargo on the supply of weapons to the whole of Yugoslavia, in which only Serbia was armed because it took over most of the weapons of the former Yugoslav People's Army. That affected all but the Serbia.
Today, all the republics of the former Yugoslavia are under the occupation of the American army, regardless of the fact that some are members of the NATO pact and some are not.
Kosovo was conquered by the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia / Serbia and the proxy army of Albanians, like Ukrainians in Ukraine today or ISIL in Syria.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The Russian military action in February 2022 started with the entry of the Russian army into Ukraine from several directions, but not on the main route from the Donbass because at that time there were about 110,000 soldiers concentrated in the Donbass from each side and a frontal attack would have ended with many more dead soldiers on both sides and with many more victims among civilians in the city of Donetsk, which before the war had more than a million inhabitants.
The Russians did not make the mistake of WWII and Operation Barbarossa when it was obvious that the German army would enter Russia, but the Russians struck first and created an opportunity for themselves to shape the battlefield.
With these maneuvers, the Russians managed to stretch the Ukrainian army across the south and north of Ukraine and easily occupy certain areas north of Crimea, around Kherson, Kharkov and Kiev.
When the front lines throughout Ukraine were stabilized, negotiations began in Istanbul, which caused the Russians to withdraw from the vicinity of Kiev as a stimulus to the negotiations, which failed due to the cancellation of the Ukrainian side. After the conquest of Mariopol in the spring of 2022, the Russians no longer had the strength to maintain the front and before the Ukrainian offensive they retreated from the right side of the Dnieper and from the city of Kherson and from the vicinity of Kharkov, which means that the Ukrainian offensive in the fall of 2022 was largely successful.
With the end of the Ukrainian offensive, the front line stabilized in the southeastern part of Ukraine, some hundred kilometers from the Russian border and about 1,000 kilometers from the Polish border, where most of the NATO logistics for the Ukrainian army came from. In a few months, the Russians built three lines of defense, the so-called Surovikin line, and the war of maneuver replaced the war of attrition with a much better position for the logistics of the Russian Army.
The Ukrainian offensive in the summer of 2023 completely failed and the war of attrition continued with a smaller advance of the Russian army in the Donbass. The Russians won two major battles for Bakhmut and Avdeevka and many smaller ones.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@HistoryHustle I am Croat from Split and I don't care where you are from, but I do not allow the history of my city, where I have lived for 60 years, to be written by someone from the outside. Regardless of whether they were Turks, Serbs, Austrians, Hungarians, Italians, Germans, French, English, Americans. That is impossible without a good knowledge of the Croatian or Serbian languages, which are almost the same. For 60 years I have been walking among the walls from which each stone tells its own story.
This war zone is nothing compared to the topic of the war during the breakup of Yugoslavia. Just then everyone would go completely crazy.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@adamderbent6986 You continue to blatantly manipulate using half-truths that are more effective for manipulation than active lies.
You referred to the Soviet style of killing civilians. First there are no Soviets now, Russians are not Soviets as you are not Yugoslav.
Second, I mentioned Falluja and Raqqa as a style of killing civilians because you wrote that the Soviets have their way of mass killing people. American's style in killing civilians is a way more effective then Sovit's style.
If there were civilian casualties from Russian missiles, it was due to the actions of the NATO proxy anti-aircraft defense. In addition, in the last week, more civilians were killed in Donetsk, Gorlovka and Belgorod than in the territory controlled by the NATO proxy.
Since 2014, more than 800 children have been killed in the Donbas region alone by the bombing of the Ukrainian army.
There were elements of aggression and civil war in Croatia, because you cannot talk about aggression if people whose families have lived in the same city for hundreds of years go to war. If you are going to talk about aggression, then Croatia also committed aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina because Croatian army from Croatia, cities and villages hundreds of kilometers away were killing native Serbs in the villages of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Now is neither the time nor the place to talk about the causes of the war in the former Yugoslavia. Simply put, the Serbs in Croatia demanded veto rights under the 1974 constitution, and the Croats demanded the borders of the Republic of Croatia under the same constitution. Not about that now.
The West under the leadership of the Americans at the beginning of the war supported Yugoslavia with Serbian domination until Croatia collapsed economically in 1994 and then Tuđman privatized all public banks and handed over the Croatian National Bank to the global mafia and Croatia and Croats have been debt slaves ever since. All this so that the liberation of Croatia from America would be politically, informationally, logistically and financially supported.
For example, the Americans stole the Ukrainian Central Bank from the Ukrainians in 2014. The day after the coup in Ukraine in 2014, all the gold was taken from the Ukrainian Central Bank.
Hollande and Merkel publicly stated that the Minsk peace accords were never intended to be implemented and that it was merely buying time for Ukraine to arm itself.
You don't live in reality because you don't understand that Ukraine is not Croatia, nor Serbia is not Russia.
And finally, every country has the right to defend itself, but Ukraine as a country no longer exists, as does Yugoslavia. These are facts, no matter how long you live in the illusion. Some still think that Yugoslavia will be resurrected.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Orcram As I wrote, difference in empires are not so important.
I live in Croatia, a country whose soldiers fought for others three times in the last 200 years (Napoleon, Habsburgs Empire, Hitler) and left bones all over Russia, without Russian soldiers ever attacking Croatia.
After Croatia joined NATO and the EU, Croatia lost 10% of its population, this did not happen even during the war in the early 1990s.
Today, after Lithuania, Croatia is the country that has lost the most inhabitants due to emigration and declining birth rates after joining the EU.
And now when I see someone talking about the collapse of Russia, I get an allergic rash.
In 2022, Croatia entered the Eurozone, that is, it introduced the Euro, and everything became more expensive, that is, inflation gained momentum.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
NATO and Russia are playing hide-and-seek, NATO first sends some weapons to Ukraine, the Russians rebel, NATO sends even more and more deadly weapons to Ukraine, the Russians resent it even more, NATO estimates that the Russians are weak and NATO threatens to send troops in Ukraine, Putin says boooooo, NATO is keeping quiet, then Macron appears and sends the French Foreign Legion and the Russians immediately kill 7 Legionnaires, then Cameron and Macron say they will send missiles to target deep into Russia, Putin answers them you will get missiles back to London and Paris and now everything quiet, war may go on as usual until next sketch . . . :)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ivanhus3852 I live in the Mediterranean, the Balkans and southern Europe, just as, for example, Swedes live in the Baltics, the Scandinavia and Northern Europe.
Don't bullshiting.
As a Mediterranean, Greeks, Montenegrins, and Italians in mentality are closer to me than Continentals, regardless of whether they are Slovenians, Croats or Serbs.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tcavuzic If you want, every war has similarities.
Ukraine may have had some sovereignty, but that sovereignty disappeared with the 2014 coup and part of the Ukrainian citizens simply did not want to recognize that illegal and illegitimate government. With the unconstitutional overthrow of Yanukovych, Ukraine ceased to exist as a legal entity. No one can deny the fact that the Ukrainian Central Bank was hijacked from Ukraine in 2014 and all the gold was taken away. The Russians didn't do that. Sorry. That was the end of any trace of Ukraine's sovereignty, and since then Ukraine has been a vassal of the West.
As for Yugoslavia, there was also a problem of the constitution. I'm not judging, I'm just stating the facts. The constitution of any country is not an e-shop so that it can be put in the basket of things as desired.
Yugoslavia was an internationally recognized country and used the army to protect its borders, I don't think it should have been like that, but Ukraine did the same with the difference that it was done in Ukraine by an unconstitutionally brought government.
And I react to half-truths such as the West supporting only Croatia, that is not true, NATO was the executor of the ban on importing weapons to Croatia while Serbia was armed to the teeth. In addition, a lot of weapons came from Russia, which does not agree with the thesis that Russians and Serbs are the same.
I have only presented the deliberately hidden facts that change the view of the overall picture.
No one can tell me that Serbia and Russia are the same and that is exactly what led to this war.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@croatianhistoryandidentity8261 Cyrillic is a derivation of Glagolitic. Everyone can easily see it. This transition took place in the last phase of early Christianity, that is, a little before the 11th century, when the church schism occurred.
You skipped no less than 800 years and reached the Serbian reformers in the 19th century.
After the church split, the Vatican under his authority allowed the use of the language of the time, which the Croats called Croatian, the Serbs Serbian, and in fact the same language, in the Catholic part.
The Vatican's condition was that masses be celebrated in Latin and that the official script become Latin. Then intensive work on languages began, both among Catholics and among Orthodox, who continued to modify the common language and kept the common Cyrillic alphabet.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@martinskovpoulsen2736 Maybe I didn't explain well enough, and maybe you didn't understand well.
It is a fact that the Russian army withdrew from Eastern European countries.
And now that no agreement existed is your impression, but you ask the French and other Europeans who, under the leadership of Napoleon, were in Moscow and were later escorted to Paris, then ask the Germans and other Europeans who, under the leadership of Hitler, came to Stalingrad and were escorted away back to Berlin, where they have evidence that they were in Russia.
I have no evidence, and neither do the Russians.
If you want evidence, you no longer have to go to Russia to get it, you will find it in Ukraine . . . let me know when you find it . . . good luck . . . :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KaLaka16 Very simply, among other things, this guy talks about "occupied territories of Ukraine" instead of "territory controlled by Russia" because Russia has legally declared 4 regions to be part of the Russian Federation, which is now being attacked by the Ukrainian army, which is actually controlled by the West.
In order to be neutral, it is essential not to prejudge the disputed territories where the war is being waged. So these are neither Russian nor Ukrainian territories, but there are territories under the control of Russia and territories under the control of Ukraine.
If we are going to refer to international law, then we have to accept the fact that in Ukraine in 2014, the President of the State was illegally removed, that is, the President was removed unconstitutionally, which is against both Ukrainian and international law.
Ukraine as an internationally recognized state has ceased to exist.
I watched maybe a few more comments by this guy about the war in the territory of the former Ukraine, and he nowhere mentions the daily shelling and dead civilians in the city of Donetsk in Donbas, where 14,000 civilians were killed from 2015 to 2022, of which 800 were children, and there are still dead civilians now every day as well.
I know what I'm talking about because I fought in the war during the breakup of the former Yugoslavia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mac_mcleod Yes, I saw last year on Youtube how The Ghost of Kyiv crashes dozens of Russian planes every day . . . :)
For example, YouTube prohibits videos of commissars capturing Ukrainians in the streets and shopping centers and taking them to the front after a few days of training.
That ban tells me everything about YouTube.
You know when I was young, we as kids of 7 - 8 years old told our grandmother who didn't have a television that people were on the moon and we told her it was on television as an argument. She answered, they can put whatever they want on your television. We used to laugh at grandma, but today, 50 years later, I don't know if people really went to the moon.
When asked why is that, I often get incoherent answers. I just know that technology has progressed a lot since then and I remember the first computer I saw at university in 1981 that was the size of a medium-sized car, and today my smartphone has more memory and a faster processor than that computer. So much for the advancement of technology.
I want to say that I have some life experience and I know what can happen in the media while the reality looks completely different.
In the end, I went through the war in the territory of the former Yugoslavia and I know how propaganda works.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The West underestimated Russia, first expecting a collapse after the introduction of sanctions in 2014. The West armed Ukraine thinking that the Russians were ignorant. The Russians knew that according to the plans of the West, Ukraine refused to implement the peace agreements from Minsk, and that the West prepared Ukraine for an attack on the Donbass. In February 2022, it was concentrated about 110000 soldiers in the Donbass from each side and a frontal attack Ukrainians to Donetsk would have ended with many more dead soldiers on both sides and with many more victims among civilians in the city of Donetsk, which before the war had more than a million inhabitants.
The Russians did not make the mistake of WWII and Operation Barbarossa when it was obvious that the German army would enter Russia, but the Russians in February 2022 struck first and created an opportunity for themselves to shape the battlefield.
With these maneuvers, the Russians managed to stretch the Ukrainian army across the south and north of Ukraine and easily occupy certain areas north of Crimea, around Kherson, Kharkov and Kiev.
When the front lines throughout Ukraine were stabilized, negotiations began in Istanbul, which caused the Russians to withdraw from the vicinity of Kiev as a stimulus to the negotiations, which failed due to the cancellation of the Ukrainian side. After the conquest of Mariopol in the spring of 2022, the Russians no longer had the strength to maintain the front and before the Ukrainian offensive they retreated from the right side of the Dnieper and from the city of Kherson and from the vicinity of Kharkov, which means that the Ukrainian offensive in the fall of 2022 was largely successful.
With the end of the Ukrainian offensive, the front line stabilized in the southeastern part of Ukraine, some hundred kilometers from the Russian border and about 1,000 kilometers from the Polish border, where most of the NATO logistics for the Ukrainian army came from. In a few months, the Russians built three lines of defense, the so-called Surovikin line, and the war of maneuver replaced the war of attrition with a much better position for the logistics of the Russian Army.
The Ukrainian offensive in the summer of 2023 completely failed and the war of attrition continued with a smaller advance of the Russian army in the Donbass.
Russians are not that dumb.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelmeenan5522 I don't lecture you, I just asked why you write nonsense, because for me it's nonsense to meddle in other people's wars, that is, to fight for others, because it never ends well. My warfare ended 30 years ago in the former Yugoslavia and don't worry, I know the technology of propaganda before, during and after the war.
My ancestors went to war against the Russians three times in the last 200 years and left their bones in Russian land.
When you talk about the invasion, don't think that the Russians don't know what the invasion is, which they experienced from the Europeans for Napoleon, Austria and Germany in WWI and Hitler during WWII.
Only fools could think that the NATO invasion of Russia would go smoothly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Timrath You blatantly lie.
The embargo on arms sales to Yugoslavia was introduced on September 25, 1991.
The war in BiH means the first killing of Muslims or Serbs or Croats in BiH appeared in 1992, so it is a pure lie that the embargo was introduced so that Serbs or Croats would not kill Muslims. BS. Everything is easily verifiable.
Who are you to judge who was a criminal and who was not in the territory of the former Yugoslavia. What are you, a deity or what?
As I wrote, at the beginning of the war, the US did not allow Croatia to acquire weapons, as, for example, the US actively armed Ukraine from 2015, and that is why the war in Yugoslavia differs from the war in Ukraine.
Furthermore, the US armed Croatia only in the fourth year of the war in 1994 and only after Croatia handed over the Croatian Central Bank to the global mafia. Without American political, intelligence, logistical and financial support, Croatia would not have won the war and when the war in Croatia ended in August 1995, several hundred Serbian civilians were killed months later who had not left their homes where they had lived since birth. These were mostly old and infirm men and women.
That was also a proxy US business, because in 1995 the US had full control over the Croatian Army, just as it now has control over the Ukrainian Army, and this is, for example, one of the similarities between the wars in Yugoslavia and Ukraine.
I do not justify anyone's crimes, those who fought and those who committed them are guilty of that. What is also important is that the Americans and Brits intensively added fuel to the war conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They were the ones who brought the Mujahedin to BiH. And then the beheading began in BiH.
I'm not writing this for you. You have no help from the propaganda and false history that has taken over you in order to sell your brains to us who lived through the hell of that war, regardless of which side we fought for.
1
-
@Timrath The borders within the republics of Yugoslavia were determined by the communists (Bosnia and Herzegovina did not even exist as a federal unit in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) as well as the borders of Ukraine where, for example, in 1954 the Ukrainian Khrushchev administratively annexed Crimea from Russia to Ukraine.
Consider those facts then you can go further.
I was waiting for you there. Nationalities existed even before Yugoslavia and Ukraine. True. And if peoples who belong to their own nations have some rights in Yugoslavia, why shouldn't they have the same rights in Ukraine.
You came to Putin's claims, where Russians are in the majority, that is Russia.
Serbs were the majority in Yugoslavia and they wanted a unitary Yugoslavia, and I don't think that's right either. But why would it be okay for Ukrainians to have a unitary Ukraine as if Russians did not exist in Ukraine.
The Russians only asked for autonomy in Donbas, Ukraine without Crimea, which is Russian anyway and which Khrushchev administratively annexed to Ukraine in 1954, and they agreed to it in the Minsk agreements. The Anglo-Saxons did not allow that to the Ukrainians.
Now the Russians are looking for Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. If the Anglo-Saxons do not agree, the Russians will ask for Odesa and Kharkov.
Going back to the history of warfare and negotiations with the Russians, the first Russian offer was always the best.
1
-
@The_Touring_Jedi I know that the question was not addressed to me, but I will answer you when I am here.
The disintegration of Yugoslavia should be seen in the context of the changes that took place at the end of the 1980s, when the USSR collapsed and the balance of power was disturbed, and then the existence of Yugoslavia was no longer necessary for anyone. In the beginning, the West, or if you want the EU and NATO under the leadership of the US, wanted to swallow Yugoslavia all at once, but it didn't work for many other reasons. When the West saw that it was not going well, it decided to democratize republic by republic, conducting parallel relations with the federal and republican authorities until the point when the west began to finance it, read to control the republics separately. That led to war as West planned.
The West manipulated, when the Serbs had more weapons than the others, the West did not help those who had no weapons until the moment before they were defeated, and only then would the West give them weapons in exchange for obedience. Like in Ukraine today. No one tells Zelensky what to do, but he is given more or less weapons, so he obeys exactly as much as he gets weapons, because without weapons from the West Ukraines only alternative is capitulation. Blackmailed in this desperate situation, Zelenski is ready to do anything, even mobilizing soldiers without limbs or people with Down syndrome.
The West is not the main one who should be blamed for the breakup of Yugoslavia, but also the peoples in their nationally disordered republics. However, the main culprits are the peoples of the nations who all drank the fraud of democracy that they drank through nationalism.
Very similar to Ukraine, where democracy was driven in on the vehicles of Nazism. I must admit that in Ukraine it is as bad as Nazism is worse than nationalism, because nationalism does not necessarily have to be bad in order to be balanced with globalism.
Ukraine failed to be democratized despite George Soros who publicly stated that since the mid-1980s he organized and financed his own open societies in Ukraine. In 2014, Victoria FEU Nuland also publicly stated that since 1991, the US has invested 5 billion dollars in democracy in Ukraine, and we have seen that it was not successful either. The first colored revolution in 2005 failed, but the colored revolution in 2014 succeeded and the coup or regime change succeeded. I am convinced that there would be colored revolutions in Yugoslavia as well until one succeeded, and the uncertainty that Ukraine had from 1991 to 2014 only hindered the development of Ukraine and generated greater and greater corruption. It would be similar in Yugoslavia. We should not mourn for Yugoslavia, because Yugoslavia would also be robbed and betrayed by the same people who did it in the Yugoslav republics. Literally the same people who are ready to lie, steal and kill.
There is a saying in our country who lies, steals, and who steals kills.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevinu.k.7042 I didn't write anywhere that I don't want comments on what I wrote. I just want to say how it looks from my environment. If you live in the UK, you can comment on events all over the world, but I don't accept someone telling me what is better for me. Just that.
In the previous comment, I briefly presented the whole picture, and you took one sentence out of the context of what I pointed out to you. That was a remark, and by no means a refusal to accept the comments you are imposing on me.
I also take into account the difference between your mindset and mine.
Again, without qualifying what NATO and the EU and Russia actually are, I can state the bare facts to explain why I am writing what I am writing.
Croatia, where I live, lost fewer inhabitants in the 1991 - 1995 war than in the time since joining NATO and the EU, when it has lost 600,000 inhabitants, both due to a lower birth rate and due to emigration for economic reasons. From around 4,400,000, the number has decreased to 3,800,000 in the last 15-16 years.
Croatia is not the only one, Lithuania is the first country in the EU in terms of population decline after joining the EU. In terms of population loss after joining the EU, Croatia is second only to Lithuania, where there was no war.
I wrote all that because what you wrote is not correct, I am quoting from your comment;
"Also, your part of the world has enjoyed considerable economic benefits from being in the EU and that your country joined NATO and that gets you security and a voice in NATO along with obligations."
The question arises as to what kind of progress and security this is for any country that loses up to 15% of its population in peacetime.
For me and for many people here, the EU and NATO are questionable. It's strange to me that you tell me what I should see and feel.
I will repeat, I can listen to what you have to say, but I simply do not accept all your qualifications and you are free not to accept mine.
Each of your next comments is welcome, if mine passes the censorship of the yt algorithm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This phone talk leakage is the usual work of the secret services, both Western and Russian, and to refer to the statements of the secret services is naive to say the least.
The executors of this leak were the English, and nothing happened without them knowing everything, and perhaps being organized by the Americans, that is, the American Secret Service.
The target of the West's proxy armed attack is Russia which had to be weakened, and the target of this intelligence attack is Germany, which everyone from the West attacks the most, and of the European countries, Germany gave the most money and was always the first to be criticized by Zelenski read Americans.
It was only in Putin's last major interview that it was learned that the Russians withdrew from the vicinity of Kiev at the end of March 2022 at the insistence of Scholz and Macron, who argued that negotiations are impossible with a gun pointed at the head, alluding to the Russian semi-encirclement of Kiev. The Russians accepted that argument and withdrew from the vicinity of Kiev, and at that moment the English entered the scene, proclaiming the Ukrainian victory, organizing the appereance of the massacre in Bucha and finally the appearance of Boris Johnson in Kiev. The Anglo-Saxons, after terminating the peace accords from Minsk, also broke the negotiations in Istanbul, and the Germans and French remained in limbo in both cases.
The Russians are not so naive either that they do not know that it is not good for them to treat the Germans and the French harshly, which is exactly the goal of the Anglo-Saxons.
Only the naive do not see how Europe is divided and how the Dutch and Danes stand by the Anglo-Saxons, and the rest of the Europeans are terrified, especially the Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians and finally the Bulgarians who traditionally wait for the winner to join him.
Russia is not the only target, right after Russia the main target is Germany. There is no one who does not see it
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This phone talk leakage is the usual work of the secret services, both Western and Russian, and to refer to the statements of the secret services is naive to say the least.
The executors of this leak were the English, and nothing happened without them knowing everything, and perhaps being organized by the Americans, that is, the American Secret Service.
The target of the West's proxy armed attack is Russia which had to be weakened, and the target of this intelligence attack is Germany, which everyone from the West attacks the most, and of the European countries, Germany gave the most money and was always the first to be criticized by Zelenski read Americans.
It was only in Putin's last major interview that it was learned that the Russians withdrew from the vicinity of Kiev at the end of March 2022 at the insistence of Scholz and Macron, who argued that negotiations are impossible with a gun pointed at the head, alluding to the Russian semi-encirclement of Kiev. The Russians accepted that argument and withdrew from the vicinity of Kiev, and at that moment the English entered the scene, proclaiming the Ukrainian victory, organizing the appereance of the massacre in Bucha and finally the appearance of Boris Johnson in Kiev. The Anglo-Saxons, after terminating the peace accords from Minsk, also broke the negotiations in Istanbul, and the Germans and French remained in limbo in both cases.
The Russians are not so naive either that they do not know that it is not good for them to treat the Germans and the French harshly, which is exactly the goal of the Anglo-Saxons.
Only the naive do not see how Europe is divided and how the Dutch and Danes stand by the Anglo-Saxons, and the rest of the Europeans are terrified, especially the Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians and finally the Bulgarians who traditionally wait for the winner to join him.
Russia is not the only target, right after Russia the main target is Germany. There is no one who does not see it
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@smartguy360 The rebels in Syria had Russian T55 tanks from the stocks of the former Warsaw Pact countries, which became NATO members, and in the territories controlled by the rebels, they had direct air support from the American, Israeli and Turkish aviation.
The Russians used the S300 to a very limited extent and did not allow the Syrian Army to operate these systems. This is still the case today, and Israeli planes are still bombing Damascus. This was part of the agreement between America, Israel, Turkey and Russia. There were incidents such as the downing of a Russian plane over the territory controlled by Turkey, and the Russians fired rockets at command centers with NATO officers, as they still do in Ukraine today. Otherwise, as in Syria and in Ukraine, the Russians and the Americans have liaison officers so that things do not get out of control, that is, that a Russian plane is not shot down over Ukraine by missiles or planes from NATO countries. That's why when the F16s arrive in Ukraine, work is being done to ensure that these planes take off and land at airports on the territory of Ukraine.
This is only part of the agreement that is known, and only God knows what else was agreed behind seven closed doors.
Regardless of everything, the biggest losers in Syria are the Kurds, to whom the Americans promised a state, and that promise was the same as the American promise to the Russians that after the withdrawal of the Russian army from Eastern Europe in 1991, NATO would not expand to those territories.
There was an explanation, yes, but there was no written agreement. Hahahahaha . . . :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@galaxymyt4834 In 2022, when Joe Biden was in Poland, he publicly stated that together they would "weaken Russia" and that Putin's "regime must fall".
I don't see how it happened, nor do I see how Russia ran out of soldiers, weapons, ammunition, equipment, food, fuel, as all the Western media claimed and still claim that Russia is on the verge of collapse, which is expected at any moment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Euroscot9155 Sorry, Ukraine is not a sovereign state. It ceased to be so after the 2014 coup organized by the Americans. The very next day, all the gold from the Ukrainian Central Bank was taken to the West, not to Russia.
As in any war, everyone defends themselves. Ukraine is being defended, Russia is being defended, and America is also defending its national interests in Ukraine, and some Americans even say that investing in Ukraine is good because Russians are being killed, and no American soldiers have been killed yet.
International law has failed long before the regime change in Ukraine in 2014.
Common sense is not exclusive your sense, you don't have a monopoly on common sense, neither do I.
If you can't handle the facts then you can do whatever you want.
It's true that all Youtubers use click bait titles and I don't like that either.
Everyone has a hard time handling the truth sometimes. I am no exception as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1