Comments by "Bitcoin Zoomer" (@bitcoinzoomer9994) on "Lex Clips"
channel.
-
11
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@neinstein-says Nukes are as much of a threat to us as it is to it. If we're gone, we can't generate energy, so it destroys itself by destroying us. Also, nuclear war would wipe out billions, but a lot of nations would survive mostly in the southern hemisphere. Humanity wouldn't even be close to extinction after nuclear war. The main reason people believe nukes would wipe us out is radiation + nuclear winter, but modern nukes are a lot more efficient with their fuel meaning they spread much less radiation. Even if radiation was a problem, look at Hiroshima, it was nuked decades ago and people have been living there safely since the 90s. Radiation would make places uninhabitable for a generation or two, but that's a really short time in the scope of human history. Also, nuclear winter is a myth. If all of the nuclear weapons we have right now were detonated at ground level, they'd release less particulates into the atmosphere than all of the currently active volcanoes now. If AI is capable of destroying us, it is also capable of understanding it needs us to exist, and that nuclear war wouldn't be the end of us but probably the end of it.
1
-
1