Comments by "Michael Nurse" (@michaelnurse9089) on "DON’T TRUST ChatGPT’s CODE!" video.

  1. In 1886 when Benz created the first car they were very few who though it better than a horse or walking - after all it was likely to explode and kill the driver, or just fall over. It took 60 years for it to eventually replace the horse as the preferred method of transport. The point I am making is that the more we embed intelligent things into machines the more we will find it difficult to compete with them - alrady over the last five years Google Translate constant improvements killed translation as a career (outside of work for governments and spy agencies), the same is happening right now for artists. Programmers may be better positioned to compete or they may simply be deluded by version 0.1 of something that will improve rapidly from here - in two or three years we will know more.
    2
  2. GPT pushed an update yesterday or so with new maths in it. Elementary maths is now much more reliable based on my limited testing. Bigger numbers still bugged. There are other AI made that can do very accurate maths so in time they will fix the maths problem as well.
    1
  3. I often get the "I don't know that stuff " answer from ChatGPT so the Dunning Kruger criticism is not a fundamental limitation - merely a problem with not enough or inaccurate training data - meaning it will improve over time.
    1
  4. It knows who you are for everyone "Dave Farley is a software developer and author who is known for his work in the field of continuous delivery and DevOps. He is the co-author of the book "Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation."
    1