Comments by "Legal Fiction Natural Fact" (@legalfictionnaturalfact3969) on "TIKhistory" channel.

Dr1flush, sweetie, socialism is socialism regardless of how many adjectives you add onto the front. Words mean things.
49
@dr1flush you call him adolf like you buddies. lmao. and dude saying that marxism and communism are not socialism doesn't make them not socialism. socialism= institutionalized public property. they all qualify. you're welcome, brainwashed dumbshit. socialism is socialism. lmao. XD
15
hitler was socialist and used its crappy principles to commit atrocities, and yet people in the usa still think socialism is great. lol.
9
Aiden, no the proponents of free market are not falling for Hitler's propaganda. You know who did? The Socialist Party. The Nationalist Socialist Party For Whom the Nazis were named. This speaks to the ignorance of socialists at best. At worst, they didn't care what Hitler called it as long as their principles match his. And they did. Because they were all socialists in principle, again, regardless of what anyone called anyone else.
7
@alexthestalinloverhistoryb2814 now, is it REQUIRED that each individual of a community own the "means of production"... which can be as simple as a knife? can an individual opt out?
7
Diggy Dumbo, anarcho capitalism is a redundant phrase. Anarchism encompasses capitalism completely. Full free market. So the correct word is anarchist. The think tanks have invented a way to divide anarchists by pretending they are into camps, Communists and capitalists. LOL. Do not fall for it.
5
No, we are not being oppressed by an unknown entity. But by a known one. There are families who have worked to create Empires via their militaries and a churches, which are inextricable, for many hundreds of years.
4
Agree with this video in general, but would say be careful using billionaire examples of capitalist success. In pure capitalism, or a 100% free market, there would be no billionaires like Bezos. The reason he had the success he does is not only because of his work, but because of how the system is set up to screw workers over. Dude has terrible company policy. He couldn't get away with that if the market were free because there would be so many competitors to Amazon that all the workers would go to the ones that treated them better. His near-monopoly came about because of the way the system is set up, and that very much includes a lot of socialist activity and principle that play. There are no self-made billionaires. These dudes are also almost always bloodline. They've gotten a leg up due to nepotism. Needless to say, nepotism wouldn't exist in a 100% free market either, because the roles someone plays in production has everything to do with how efficient he is, not who his Grand Daddy might have been.
4
@CArchivist i'm not disagreeing with your broader point about certain trades' relevance to current day, but note that it wasn't simply "WHITE PEOPLE" who enslaved africans. it was the RULING BLOODLINES. is white skin treated as superior in general around the world? yes, thanks to might makes right influence, at the top, by the VATICAN (who are to blame for the SS). was it the average person who could even afford to attain slaves on invest in the business of doing so? no way. funny thing is how the uninformed and those in denial don't admit the supremacies of race/color come from patriarchy*. how so? by men demanding to know exactly *which offspring is their lines.. which of course is of utmost importance to the ruling bloodlines. that's how color and phenotype becomes relevant.. from what man do you descend? joke's on them though, as the line is not male. it is female. by nature. we descend from woman. that is pure genetics. science and nothing more. that said, those who defend the old slave owners thinking they are defending white (not a race!) people in general? are indeed white supremacist and are being pulled around by their noses. they are clueless. EURO RULING BLOODLINES is the most succinct and accurate demographic term to describe the group who headed up the transatlantic enslavement biz.
3
well... anything thrives when it can't be contested. radicalism is extreme and is exactly what the mind needs to adopt in every possible case.
3
@alexthestalinloverhistoryb2814 actually, yes, it does lead to atrocities. if you can STEAL from producers to have "public" (code for state) property, then you have begun down the slippery slope. just like every german who followed the national socialists party.
3
@TheImperatorKnight i don't need links, you missed my point. if the first thing you mention when talking about "racism" is not white supremacy but rather affirmative action, then you're doing the "racism goes both wayyzzz" argument. you harbor white supremacist views. oppression goes one way. white supremacy goes one way. male supremacy goes one way. affirmative action is a bandaid on the hatchet wound on women and folks of color. and it's in place to help divide us further by getting white people to focus on that and be mad instead of focusing on the worldwide nazi master race belief and how to win the fight against it. that's what caused the hole for affirmative action to go in in the first place. you mentioned none of that because you are on the opposite side of the argument. some think tank's plan is working on you. whether races exist is utterly irrelevant when phenotypes do and that is the true basis for white supremacy. you don't look at someone and see their dna sequences or 'quanta' typed out on your eyeballs. you see their physical attributes. the abrahamic "nephilim" shit as talked about in the bible is likely not helping.
3
@oberstul1941 you might be trolling; or just can't read a room. can't decide. stand by.
3
This does not mean profit has two meanings. You are just taking profit from meaning financial only to meaning any kind of benefit. And I do agree that it should be treated that way. "What does it profit a man to gain the world and lose his soul?" outlines it nicely too. Also, ancap and ancom are think tank nonsense. They are creating a dualism that doesn't need to be there. So sick of dualism honestly. All dichotomies are false. Anarchism is an umbrella that goes over capitalism. You can't have one without the other, at least not 100%. Capitalism means the individual keeps The spoils of her own labor. It is just the opposite of the state stealing The spoils of that labor, AKA socialism. It's anarchism. We don't need more words for it and we don't need qualifiers on it. IT'S JUST ANARCHISM. Time to stop trying to repackage crap in different combinations and sell it. It's already fine. If it's not broke don't fix it.
2
he couldn't be more wrong. "we should fight against the establishment.. but schoolkids shouldn't and college students shouldn't" etc etc. NONSENSE. one's personal dignity and self-esteem means standing up. anyone who doesn't stand up just because they "want a good job" is a) incorrect about how jobs work, and b) a coward. does he really think there is no psychological damage to children by this? or that the damage will not affect their intelligence aptitude? lol. i assure you, it does, and very negatively. by clutching tight to the delusion you dream of, the reality slips through your fingers and you cement a child's misery for the rest of her life. it's small, it's ignorant, and yes, those who know better just feel sorry for her and her wishfully thinking parents. we need to put our energy into getting kids OUT OF THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. there is no way to fix it. it's *designed, by the ruling bloodlines*, to destroy the learn drive (yes, even the drive to learn precious, precious STEMMmmmmm) and all creative ability. "no, my child is SuCceSsFULLLL in academics!11" lol. the snob-wannabe idiot refrain. and guess who else was successful in academics? yours truly. it's simply not the point. and i know that because my intelligence extends FAR beyond academics. let your brain flag fly, peeps. stand up. don't leave it to the students who are brave to take it all upon themselves while you lazily benefit from their sticking their necks out. or else you are common vermin. oops.. was that not what the teach wanted to hear? hehe.
2
@RpattoYT YES. you know what is right and you stand up for it. imagine telling kids to just go along with these disgusting, pea-brained ignoramuses. lmfaooooo
2
3:36 i give it a year.
2
Do you also say that black liberation is a socialist or collectivist ideology? LOL. Feminism is not a collectivist or socialist ideology. Feminism fights for women's Liberation from men or the patriarchy. Patriarchy is the first foundational axis of Oppression because it pits 50% against the other 50% and uses the former to Massacre the latter into submission. I hope it goes without saying that this is not an exaggeration in the slightest. Feminism matches perfectly with individualism and with capitalism and a free market all of which can be wrapped up in the word anarchism.
2
Yeah, taking away a word needed to describe what largely men do to largely women and children means that women and children have no way to speak out about what happens to us. That is not an accident on the part of the propagandists.
2
uh yes, everyone knows what school is ostensibly for. and yet so many highly educateds can't find a job because it's WHO YOU KNOW. truth is that you DO NOT NEED the school system for a career. in fact, the precious, s h i t-eating ivy leagues really take interest in home-schooled individuals. DO NOT attend those ridiculous institutions, disclaimer.
2
If the first example of governments and government-funded media being racist is affirmative action? You got problems. See, I don't think there should be any government in the first place to enforce such a thing, but it's funny that men and white people don't get that this is a taste of their own medicine. And that "sexism!!" is a watered-down it-goes-both-ways-!!1 version of male/white Supremacy. The BBC and the powers-that-be have done so much worse against women and against people of color then they have against whites and men. So, so very much worse than reserving a few spots they are not allowed to fill at companies. LOL.
2
Gender violence is code for male violence. Domestic violence is code for male violence.
2
Why would you laugh? To laugh at that is male supremacist Insanity. It's not funny in the slightest. They literally had to go pro. As in, start taking money instead of just marrying men for protection, which is the other form of prostitution not being talked about explicitly here. Women are not prostitutes. Women are prostituted. There is a difference
2
@belasstrongestwarrior exactly
2
@sirgalahad2 your troll channel is completely blank. :) for the lurkers: marriage is prostitution and men invented it.
2
@deltanovember1672 i'm "the hairy feminist", actually. <3 womanist is a better term for it, as feminine only applies to nouns of certain languages, not people. and remember, men's daughters will always be treated the same way those men have treated girls and women. too late to save em by that point. yw. :)
2
@TheImperatorKnight yes, i think the breakdown you've given shows yet again that govt should not exist at all. it produces nothing but enslavement. and how anyway can the average person not be qualified to govern herself, but still be qualified to vote in/choose the person who should govern us all? voting makes no sense. democracy makes no sense. its greatest proponents are all a bunch of talentless dweebs with too much time on their hands who feel important going to meetings and dEciDiNg things for others instead of actually getting off their asses to *work*. or hell, even play and have some adventure. the naturally inferior tend to group together to cut down and steal from those they correctly presume to be their betters.
2
We call it fa-mily, not ma-mily. Male supremacy. Family as base unit requires enslavement of women, which is Alive and Well in every country today. Without female enslavement, the female is the unit in and of herself. Even a dead man can become a father, so fatherhood really is inconsequential biologically. Living in an individualistic society would highlight the fact that the female is the whole unit and the male is a partial one. To avoid this, all oppression is based and all dualistic and abrahamic religions are formed. Pair bonding the first move of collectivism? Not sure yet, but it's always ironic to hear men pretending marriage fastens them with a ball and chain when in fact men invented marriage. Some men have dared to say they did it as a favor to women, at which point of course I have to laugh. heartily. LOL. The female is default, and she is whole. Men's insistence that we are inferior is nothing but a projection. A painful truth for them, but look at it this way. We can either continue on this same path of misery and destruction. Or! We can assimilate the facts about resistance and grow ever closer to Utopia..:-)
2
@TheKumarImpressions "loving" "being together"? these things are not based on which sex one belongs to. no one loves enslavement. tho some pretend as hard as they can. <3
2
your'e 100% wrong (though no detention should be issued). socialism IS fascist. you're being fooled to think it's only on the right. it's not. the fascii are a bundle of sticks, ie, forced collectivism. ANY ideology that needs to bind people together to achieve its goals... is fascist. both sides are. the diametric opposite of fascism is ANARCHISM (greek - no rulers). anarchism is liberation and is therefore the answer. the world would be HEAVEN compared to what we have now.
1
Right, if history weren't so horrific, there would need to be no disclaimer. We have the people who committed the atrocities to thank for the need for a disclaimer.
1
Alive or trees, Obama said he never eats a hot dog over 8 years old...
1