Comments by "mowgli2071" (@mowgli2071) on "AP Explains: Hawaii loosens strict weapons laws after U.S. Supreme Court ruling" video.

 @warrenb8228 They are part of the US. They are in every way a US state. If people on either side don't like that, tough shit.
1
 @ericwilliams1659 Too bad, so sad. Doesn't matter what they "wanted" now. They're part of the Union.
1
 @John_Doe3 You are a liar. Your gun laws are unconstitutional. Unconstitutional means it's insane.
1
 @yo2trader539 No they did not. Either show where they violated a law to make Hawaii a state or step off.
1
 @oldmanghost219 Nice try with your preparatory clause. Either show where that says What show and shall not happen or GFYS.
1
 @herculesbrofister265 Lack of acquiring infringes on the right to keep and bear. Let's hear your next nonsense lie.
1
 @giant0mantis Militia being required is subjective and therefore a worthless discussion. In no state is an actual militia illegal.
1
 @giant0mantis In no state are militias illegal.
1
@giant0mantis False. Legally, what's "necessary" is very definitely subjective. One law will say that something is necessary the next will try to omit what the previous law included. Necessity is in the eye of the beholder. The second amendment calls something necessary. That doesn't mean that necessity is any less subjective. As for whether militias are necessary the second amendment says essentially that the collective militia is. This is mostly a pointless discussion past that. We can go round and round on it. On the other hand, the more objective facts can be had when discussing whether or not militias are legal: It is not the case that militias are illegal. The wokeist media will try to paint them as being such in all 50 states but they're lying. There are plenty of groups that constitute militias in all 50 states. And they could not realistically be prosecuted for being such.
1
@giant0mantis Neither did I say that they weren't necessary. I'm saying it's subjective and it's not a useful subject. The 2A does say that they are necessary. But the more important question is the question of legality.
1
@giant0mantis Militias do not require government approval to exist. That's crazy.
1
 @0IIIIII You're a liar. And were you even telling the truth, supreme Court decisions are open to reversal.
1
0:31 Immediately she jumps to firearms from just having shown guys with melee weapons (which are not firearms). This woman and her producers are a joke. The AP has become a wokeist disgrace.
1