Comments by "GH1618" (@GH-oi2jf) on "Driver arrested in connection with Windsor Hills crash that left 6 dead, including pregnant woman" video.

  1. Not until the arrestee is booked, after being released from hospital.
    2
  2. Because they don’t show photos of accused persons until an official booking photo is released. That is a prudent policy.
    2
  3. Why not just leave race out of it? There will be a booking photo available in due course. Her name is Nicole L. Linton.
    2
  4. Feticide has been a crime in California for a long time.
    1
  5. Don’t bet on that.
    1
  6. The only special treatment she is getting is medical care for her injuries. The prosecutors do want to know if she was under the influence, and if so, of what. The problem is that she was given pain meds at the crash scene, which can interfere with the tests. If they are able to charge her with DUI, they will in due course.
    1
  7. You don’t get a booking photo until she is booked.
    1
  8. Because a charge of murder requires a more thorough investigation to determine whether all the elements are present. Charges can be added. Initial charges are always the easier ones.
    1
  9. She is being charged with ehicular homicide. Manslaughter is one category of homicide.
    1
  10. Booking photos aren’t released until a person is booked, oddly enough.
    1
  11.  @ErikThomasMusic  — Charges can be added. They have to do a thorough investigation before charging murder.
    1
  12. It’s because she won’t be booked until she is released from hospital. Responsible news outlets publish photos of accused persons only when there is a formal charge and an official booking photo. Why are so many people so clueless about how the system operates?
    1
  13. Seat belt, air bags, crumple zones, and a momentum advantage.
    1
  14. A booking photo might be released when she is booked, but not before.
    1
  15. Everything has its limits. When a car is T-boned by a heavy car moving at 100 mph, the crash is not survivable because the car is torn apart. Whether the seat belt is able to keep someone in the car is a moot point.
    1
  16. The Mercedes did not catch fire. It just push the other cars out of the way and went beyond the fire.
    1
  17. No, it isn’t necessary that she be drunk or on drugs to be arrested for manslaughter. Her driving was reckless on its face.
    1
  18. Her car did not burn.
    1
  19. wrong
    1
  20. Your understanding is wrong. California has long considered the killing of a foetus in these circumstances to be a crime.
    1
  21. The jury won’t believe that.
    1
  22. No, because she would have crashed long before reaching 100 mph.
    1
  23. In this case it is because she was in a modern car with seat belts, air bags, and crumple zones. And the geometry of the crash was to her advantage.
    1
  24. A 1-year-old boy was killed.
    1
  25. This is the worst way to try that method, by T-boning other cars. Years ago, a college president killed himself by driving head-on into a log truck. That was effective and didn’t kill anyone else, although I’m sure it was upsetting to the truck driver. I am not recommending this.
    1
  26. There will be a photo when she is booked. She has been arrested bot not yet booked because she is in hospital.
    1
  27. Why not just leave color out of the discussion? Reckless drivers come in all colors.
    1
  28. Tell that story to the jury and see how well it works.
    1
  29. She is a nurse in Texas. She may not have been working in California.
    1
  30. Because she had not been booked when this newscast was made.
    1