Comments by "GH1618" (@GH-oi2jf) on "FAA chief: No specific timeline for Boeing 737 Max recertification" video.

  1. Adam Robinson — With regard to Dickson’s response at 4:07, the revisions to MCAS were directed at correcting specific, known deficiencies in the software. Testing changes which are supposed to do a specific thin under specific conditions is straightforward. He is just saying that there may be other contributing factors identified when the final reports come out.
    1
  2. Ron Piggott — Looks to me like the European agency wants to drag this out to boost Airbus.
    1
  3. Luis Vasconcelos — They can fly it all they like for testing purposes, and they have been flying it.
    1
  4. Mr. Dickson danced around the main question, and completely ignored the next question. The FAA should not delay certification while other agencies do their own thing.
    1
  5. ytg50162011 — Why would anyone trust an anonymous person on the web? We know nothing about you.
    1
  6. Mohamed Warsame — The people who are following this online and commenting on it are not representative of the flying public. People will fly on whatever aircraft will take them where they are going, and most won’t even know what it is.
    1
  7. aeo719 — The Concorde stopped flying for economic reasons unrelated to the crash. The final flights were full.
    1
  8. Richard Reid — Rushing? This is the slowest response to an aircraft defect since the Comet crashes.
    1