General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Fleccas Talks
comments

Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Fleccas Talks" channel.

thats not just an opinion thats the truth and it only works if we actually use it as intended to fight their tyrannical "laws" physically
26
@mrwolf9957 but it does no good if we dont use them because tyrants dont care unless made to by force
5
@chesterwilberforce9832 you are such an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
2
@HammerJam007 but there will be guns and armed intruders cause they dont follow the "laws" that say that you cant have them they make them or steal them or buy them from someone who doesnt care whether theyre a bad guy or not or whether they can pass a background check or not or any other "laws" that they "pass" against the second amendment
2
@dxmanforlife they have way worse stuff than shootings they have bombings and acid attacks and masses of people being run over by cars because of terrorists i wouldnt believe a word of what they say about being safer than america cause they dont all carry guns to protect themselves with
2
@twosik2315 they dont understand what bad guys are
2
@senderoverland id rather have a sign that says beware of owner cause theyre well armed and willing to use those arms if needed that would do alot more than a cat or dog sign especially if its true cause bad guys more often than not will stop whatever theyre doing if they see a gun come out alot of the time you dont even have to shoot them just the sight of the gun usually scares them off unless theyre just that determined or are on drugs or something like that at the time
2
@North Woods Hiawatha and mass bombings and people runnig over people in large groups etc cause they dont allow people to defend themselves there and its become that way here even in america because no one will stand up to the corruption and fight physically like the second amendment intends
2
@skullbones7452 shoulda used your weapons while you had em instead of turning em in
2
@deviledegg8266 yeah and we havent been doing that for a long time bow and we're almost down to nothing since we keep caving and going by the more and more so called "laws" they "pass" instead of actually physically fighting to keep our rights which is the only way that will actually work cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force (the whole point of the second amendment in the first place is to be armed as well as they are and willing to stand up to them physically if need be and it definately is cause like i said tyranta dont care unless made to by force)
2
@jhanks2012 it is a law its a law that makes other laws not possible to be passed but it only works if we actually use it to physically fight back with like it was intended for in the first place cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force about us or their limits of power etc they do what they want when they want when theres no backlash and no real consequences to their actions its plain and simple
2
@Gr3nadgr3gory you should be able to own alot more than that according to the second amendment that says "arms" (which means weapons and not just certain ones)
2
@Timenaught it sure is but theyve been doing that slowly over about a century if not more now because we havent been using it as intended to fight back physically like we should be and shouldve been when they even first suggested putting the "laws" in in the first place
2
@johnycakes6613 actually the first amendment would make that thing about "yelling fire in a theater" part not actually a thing that they could make illegal too its just like the second how they cant make any weapon illegal in any way cause the first amendment says "freedom of speech" not just in certain places or only free to say certain things yeah it might be stupid to do but you should still be able to say whatever you please cause of the first amendment that doesnt say a limited amount of speech just like the second amendment doesnt say a limited amount of arms
2
@johnycakes6613 its not the best thing we have by far what would be is if we went by the original constitution how its written and the people regulate the power of the government through any means neccesary to where they cant or wont take any of our rights in any way thats the only way itll be civilised and bad guys will either think twice or wish they had a few years in jail then being released doesnt phase them but knowing people are armed and willing to use those arms if needed will it all takes the people doing whats neccesary though which is like i said regulating the governments power through any means neccesary
2
@peterfitswell535 i really doubt it is and even if it is that doesnt meab you should "ban" them from everyone cause that would include good people too that could stop them with that same gun/weapon if they had them and itd make bad guys think twice or wish they had abd get shot either way is way better than just letting the bad guys so whatever they please cause theyll do what they want regaurdless of any so called "laws" they "pass" they know exactly what theyre doing they wont budge on their position to "ban" all guns/weapons its not about the guns or the violence you can do with them to the government its about their control over you and they cant do that if youre armed and willing to use them to against them so they "pass" more and more "laws" slowly as they get people on board with them and get people to enforce them until we have nothing left (if we go by their "laws" that is i mean)
2
@kiwi7872 if you defund them then you dont have them cause then they have no equipment no cars no nothing so they actually are kinda the same thing to be honest
1
@geronimo67 yeah no police
1
@tenzintsenpey5274 that wouldnt be that bad of a thing considering most if not all are corrupt and are paid to and do enforce "laws" that take away our rights
1
@mikebarat2884 reforming wont work we dont pay their paychecks the government does so they tell them what to do or not not us
1
@mikebarat2884 you dont have common sense if youre a lefty dont talk about common sense unless you actually know what youre talking about and just seeing that youre left i know you dont
1
@tenzintsenpey5274 police kill alot of innocent people they are dangerous most if not all are corrupt and do whatever the government says cause theyre paid to do it not cause its actually good or actually protecting us or our rights like their actual job is
1
@911ragdoll the actual stupid ones are but the ones "in charge" that lead them know exactly what theyre doing or we'd all have machineguns that we made ourselves and bombs etc without worrying about going to jail for it or dying because of it theyve "banned" so much stuff to where we dont have a single weapon thats useful to take them on if we go by their so called "laws" that they "pass"
1
@silverletter4551 even the ones who say theyre "republicans" have "banned" things that are unconstitional to ban you know that right? libertarians dont allow that kind of crap or support that and if they do those things they arent real republicans/libertarians etc or right theyre leftist posing as the right or republicans
1
@tonybtrucks3029 itd work way better cause the people are already there when the crime could possibly happen to immediately respond and shoot the would be criminal/bad guy thatd make them think twice or wish they had alot more than a phone and saying "wait a minute bad guy let me get my phone out and call the police and wait til they get here so they can arrest you"
1
@rpscorp9457 wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@mikebaird6788 no pretty sure it would be a great idea the police more than not are corrupt and just do what theyre told cause theyre paid to not cause its their actual job and if people had to fend for themselves they could do it alot better than the cops which take way too much time to respond when the person thats already there in the situation can respond immediately and defend themselves which is way more effective than a phone and saying "wait a minute bad guy let me get my phone out so i can call the police and wait for them to come arrest you"
1
@dubsmith1969 it actually does cause anymore most of not all the cops are corrupt anymore and kill innocent people and most if not all get away with it more than not
1
@Starman062 wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
1
@maadhujovi9528 no 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@tomeverett2212 dont take them from anyone fight physically to keep what you have cause thats the only way theyll care is if made to by force and its the whole point of the second amendment in the first place is to fight back physically against their so called "laws" they "pass"
1
@tomeverett2212 but theyre not going to be limited in it cause we dont make them be by using the second amendment as intended to take them out for trying to take our rights like we should be
1
@MFper4mance yeah right and even if they do have less shootings or robbings or whatever they make up for it in a way worse way with mass killings with terrorists bombings and people getting run over in crowds by cars and acid attacks etc like that so dont say that stupid stuff like theyre more civilised or safer there than here cause they dont walk around with guns idiot
1
@asanmartinjr07 probly both cause that one dude with the hitler sign had to be on something cause theres no way anyone can be that stupid
1
@gone547 they wont
1
@catherinesyme901 wow youre an idiot
1
@sweetpea221000 wow youre an idiot
1
@geoalmike8498 i wouldnt give any weapons to the pigs in blue fight to keep what you have physically like the second amendment intends
1
@catherinesyme901 ok idiot whatever you say 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
1
@MFper4mance ok bud whatever you say
1
@catherinesyme901 because youre a liberal idiot and theres a thing called bad guys that we'd want to prptect ourselves from and a tyrannical government
1
@joserobles4875 they didnt "get rid of them" they just made it to where ""law" abiding" people dont have them
1
@joserobles4875 they wouldnt be if the people stood up for their rights and fought back physiclly instead of going by what the government says
1
@joserobles4875 the smart people already know that but i wouldnt say "criminals" cause i dont care where you are they shouldnt be able to take any weapons at all in any way or for any reason etc like that and it should be fought against physically if they do try and like they already have done
1
@A1TheBest it actually is legal but they enforce it as if it were a real law and put innocent people in jail just like they do here with certain weapons and itll soon be all weapons if we keep allowing them to take them slowly but surely instead of fighting physically against it like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@wild western man bo there are others that do just very few cause of how bad the "laws" are there they make it so bad to try getting one that most people dont want to try to get them and its so restrictive and they "pass" more and more "laws" that make it so hard to know what they consider "legal" and because stupid people go by their stupid "laws" they just keep having less and less and actually all of america has less and less cause we dont fight back physically against their so called "laws" that they "pass" like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@joserobles4875 so is the american one if you havent noticed how much theyve taken of our weapons because we've not been fighting it physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
anything is a "weapon of war" if used in a war they used to use slings with rocks in them in war back in the day so slingshots would be considered "weapons of war" by that definition or just rocks in themselves so yeah that definition definately cant be used as what we define what we can and cant have weaponwise and the fact that its written that they arent allowed to regulate or limit our weapons in any way or after any amount of time etc with the second amendment but it only worrks if we actually use it as intended to fight back physically against the so called "laws" they "pass" against it cause tyeants dont care unless made to by force
1
@justinsydnes3346 the thing about that is they actually did have more than what they say they had back then they literally had machineguns back in the day though for the second amendment part and for the first amendment it says "freedom of press" that covers all types of mediums including the internet they were definately smarter than the idiots that say its outdated they worded it that way hecause they knew technology would advance like it has been since before they were around and same way for the second amendment in how they wrote it to say "arms" (which just means weapons or not just firearms and it isnt short for firearms and not just certain ones and not just the weapons they had back then or not just what the government says youre allowed to have or in the way they say you can have them etc like that) and shall not be infringed. period. no ifs ands or buts to make it changeable in any way or after any amount of time or after any certain person in the government says it can be changed or any of the bullcrap they say or even any reason they dont say you get my point it pre empts change in the future the way its worded but it only works if we fight physically against the so called "laws" they "pass" against it and the other "laws" they "pass" against the rights we should have constitutionally its supposed to be so we can effectively fight the government with all the weapons they have without having to have anything they say you ""need" for it to be "legal"" like licenses or taxes etc like that or how they say you can only own certain guns or only certain ones that fire certain ammo or only certain ones that only have certain attachments or certain ones that can only fire so fast etc like that
1
@TheNajSD theyre pretty much the same gun as the one the military uses with the exception of the functions ill give them that but youre semi right they dont usually use just regular semiauto ones other than like in a snipers or dmr type rifle or whatever like that and those are ar-10s or sr-25s or m110s or whatever other designations they give them dont get me wrong the libbies are stupid as crap but they do use that pattern of rifle not the exact one like i said but the fire modes and calibers like for the ar-10s and sr-25s etc are really the only things that set them apart from regular ar-15s
1
@soupholelegs1173 if youre asking stupid people then yes its not just the whole world there are plenty of smart people but the dumb people listen to the people "in charge" that mislead them by saying the stupid stuff and say the misinformation the smart people usually dont go by what they say and the even smarter people like me see what theyre doing theyre misleading even the smart people into thinking no one is dumb enough to believe what they say about guns/weapons so they think nothing can come from it but look at where we're at right now with all the gun/ weapon "bans" we all go by their so called "laws" they "pass" that arent even real cause of the second amendment they wouldbtve gotten as far as they have and taken as much as they have if they didnt know exactly what they were talking about and doing theyre masters of deception to people who arent smart enough to see through what theyre doing
1
@KingdomOfApple a few less? the average for an m4/m16/ar-15 etc like that is like 30 rounds plus one in the chamber the m1 holds 8 in the clip and yes it is a clip actually an enbloc clip and maybe one in the chamber thats alot more tha a few less in the m1 but thats not even the point the second amendment says they arent allowed to take any guns/weapons in any way shape or form for any reason but the problem is we havent been using it as intended to be armed as well as them so we can have a chance at effectively taking them on cause we just keep caving to their new "laws" they keep "passing" instead of fighting physically like we should be against them and shouldve been for way too long now and shouldve been when they first even suggested putting them in in the first place we shouldve hung them for treason for even suggesting these so called "laws"
1
@soupholelegs1173 actually any of the two could be "war weapons or anything thats used in war would be a "war weapon" they use knives in war but you dont hear people calling knives "war weapons" or hear anyone calliing to "ban" knives unless theyre just as retarded as the people wanting to "ban" any type of weapon or gun or tool for that matter cause thats all guns are and theyre not even that until you load them and use them for whatever youre going to use them for theyre just pieces of whatever theyre made of until that point and cant do anything on their own
1
@AngelofDeath1431 some do understand but dont care and thats the politicians that are misleading them and even the smart people into believing no ones stupid enough to believe the bullcrap they say but the even smarter people like me can see through that bullcrap they get all the stupid people on board with what theyre saying cause they dont know any better and like i said make the smart people think nothing will come of it cause what theyre saying is so stupid that they think no one would get on board with it
1
@georgecarrera18 and cannons and they even had machineguns not like we think of them roday but they literally had machineguns even if they werent really used in wars they had that kind of technology look it up on forgotten weapons on youtube its a flintlock machinegun with 7 barrels and looks like a minigun but obviously doesnt spin and have a motor like one cause its a flintlock look up flintlock machinegun forgotten weapons
1
@austinwhite3132 theyre retarded but the people in charge that mislead them arent they intentionally say stupid stuff and the stupid people eat it up like theyre facts just cause someone who says theyre an expert says it
1
@John5.56 theyre more mislead than uneducated the people in charge feed them lies and stupid stuff and they just eat it up and take it as facts cause someone who said theyre an expert said it
1
@tenhirankei no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@amazedalloy they were also used in war but the idiots wouldnt know that or wouldnt care they just care about what the government or some "expert" says
1
@stephenm6641 theyre alot smarter than the idiots that think like that and by they i mean the founding fathers were smarter and thats why they worded it the way they did to say arms (which just means weapons and not certain ones or just muskets etc like that)
1
@jmoen4523 we shouldve been doing that long before bow when they first even suggested making the so called "laws" that are against the constitution/second amendment we shouldve hung them dor treason for even suggesting "passing" them
1
"natural selection" isnt real and it definately wont but if we use the second amendment as intended to fight back physically like we should that definately would and we shouldve been doing it a long time ago when they first even suggested putting them in place by hanging them for even suggesting it for treason
1
@robertrix2094 we already have been giving them up "cause theyre "illegal"" if you havent noticed pretty much everyone goes bt the so called "laws" they "pass" and people dont make machineguns and sell them to "regular people" anymore like you used to be able to and even single shot rifles or any single shot or any gun at all that isnt blackpowder and non convertable to smokeless powder or like bb gun type pr air rifles have to be registered before you can even walk out of the store with it and we dont have any actually useful effective weapons against the government anymore with how far its gone cause we've just been letting it keep going for about a century now if not more and havent been physically fighting it and yeah most people will give them up because of what ive been saying we've been caving and giving up our rights slowly now for about a century if not more because we fear jailtime or death if we go against them or if we tried to fight physically like we should people are either too scared or too brainwashed to fight physically against them thats what they wabt you to think is that "it can never happen here" or "it wont happen here" etc thats what everone thought that its happened to and thats exactly why it happened dont fall into that trap cause it already has happened here people have had their guns/weapons taken innocent people too not just guilty people who shouldve had them taken it happened in katrina and im sure plenty of other places that you wouldnt hear about cause the media would never show it happening
1
@firestorm5432 not only thet they literally had machineguns around that time not like we think of them today but look it up it was a flintlock with 7 barrels and looked like a old day minigun (but obviously not motor powered and all that cause it was a flintlock) look it up on forgotten weapons on youtube flintlock machinegun forgotten weapons
1
@tenhirankei it wouldnt be if you didnt go by their so called "laws" that made them so expensive the second amendment is supposed to be for everyone not just the rich or those that the government wants to allow to have those things
1
@justinsydnes3346 thats really the only difference that and caliber if youre talking about ar-10s or other guns like that other than that they function the exact same they fire the same round have the same bolt bolt carrier barrel all that stuff but one just has a few extra parts to add extra function like 3 round burst or full auto or some other burst mode probly there is differences yes but in the end one isnt more deadly or whatever than the other it can just fire in different modes or has a different caliber if its not an ar-15 but is an ar-10 or other caliber thats bigger than it
1
@soupholelegs1173 you should be able to conceal or open carry any weapon you please to be honest the second amendment says "arms" not certain ones in certain places that they want to allow you in a certain way they want to allow you to etc like that but it doesnt do any good to just tell them we have the second amendment cause theyre tyrants thats the whole point of the second amendment is to be able to effectively fight them physically and not have to have their permission in any way to have any gun/weapon you please anywhere you please and any time etc and to be able to use it against them when they try to abuse their power and defend yourself etc that are good uses of it
1
@John5.56 im not one of the people that just blindly believes what every "expert" says about them i said there are the idiots that believe everything they say because they say theyre "experts"
1
@donrutter6765 but it wont happen unless we make them have some consequences if they dont do what we say like they do with us we should be using the second amendment as intended to remove them by force not begging them for rights we should have that we know they wont allow us to have
1
@jhanks2012 not all weapons are unless used in war but heck a knife would be considered that by that defintion cause theyve been used in wars but you dont hear too many people screaming to ban knives unless theyre even more retarded than the gun/weapon grabbers
1
@jhanks2012 particularly a corrupt government that would try to take any of them in any way or take any accessory or require any kind of license or tax etc to be able to own them and actually thats not the purpose of "all weapons or guns" there are literally guns that are designed not to kill like paintball guns or bean bag rounds (non lethal or less lethal whatever you call them) to not kill the target only to wound them to make them stop without killing them
1
@jhanks2012 well it actually is cause it says a well regulated militia but the part they get wrong is who the militia is and they just see the word regulated and be like "hah yeah see regulated they can regulate the weapons uh huh huh"
1
Chad High-Five Flexington muskets would only tickle armor today even soft body armor could stop it dead and the wearer probly wouldnt even feel it that much we need like way better than muskets to take on the government
1
@jhanks2012 if its also blackpowder only and blackpowder only sucks against even soft body armor unless your rounds are explosive like in a cannonball or something that could actually make the nowaday armor useless which i highly doubt case todays armor pretty much can make anything black powder useless even soft body armor today could stop it dead in its tracks and the wearer would probly barely even notice theyve been hit with it thats why its unregulated they know you couldnt hirt them with it or if you could its be barely at all only unarmored targets would even be able to be effected by them and theyre definately gonna be armored more than likely and more than likely fully covered from head to toe in at least soft armor in the places that dont matter as much and hard armor where it does count
1
@johnmcgraw5385 youre all too right about that and its so sad that people dont stand up like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@richclay7928 thats the thing though they cant but the problem is we dont use the second amendment as intended to physically fight for all our rights to keep them
1
@marcof5476 no theyre fine the way they are unless you want to end up like nazi germany or alot of communist countries that had millions of innocents die at the hands of their own government the original document even pre empts any changes on the future with the last part that says "any powers not delegated in this original document shall be null and void of law" but it also has the second amendment to keep that in place with the people defending it with their weapons but if we dont defend it then its pointless to have
1
@jeffanderson8165 not at the time maybe but it was used in wars so if you go by that loose definition of a "weapon of war" then a knife would be that but you dont hear anyone calling to "ban" those or at least not too many idiots calling to ban them and their bullcrap "excuse" they give why they dont if they dont that is is "because it wasnt designed solely to kill like guns/weapons" they act like if it wasnt made for that purpose then it cant or never will be used for it or isnt just as capable of killing just as many people just as fast as a gun/weapon like a grenade or something else like that actually a car could kill way more but like i said yoi dont see too many people saying they want to ban care cause they can be used to kill alot of people really fast
1
@Chad Mower wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@johnycakes6613 but bad guys and diseases dont care about "laws" and will do it anyway so theres no stopping them with "laws" but what would stop the bad guys is the threat of a good guy with a gun or of they still try theyll wish they had thought twice and get shot
1
@Gr3nadgr3gory the first weapon ever used period was a rock....... yeah a rock blunt force from a hard object cane killed able his brother with a rock and the stupid people if you told them that would literally want to "ban" rocks
1
@Nr15121 wow youre an idiot its not just "weapons of war" and the militia are all the people outside the corrupt government/military/police that will fight that tyranny and its all weapons cause it says "arms" not certain ones or anything the government tells you it means
1
JHeints - i really hope thats a joke but even if it is stop please cause we dont need more idiots believing that kinda crap
1
@A Wise Stranger Vlog's wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@jackweinberg8681 they literally had machineguns around that time look up flintlock machine gun on forgotten weapons on youtube if that doesnt make the libbies think twice about saying that stupid crap about the second amendment only being about single shot muskets then i dont know what would
1
@feralcyborggaming1531 thats a good thing but they dont care about actual facts they argue with feelings and emotions and opinions so youll never get through to them
1
@feralcyborggaming1531 all guns/weapons are legal unless obtained illegally like being stolen or if you commit a serious and actual crime like murder or rape etc like that until that point you should be able yo own whatever you please without any kind of infringement (like licenses or taxes or background checks etc that they have "in place" now)
1
@nathanbryant53 they literally had machineguns around that time look up flintlock machinegun on forgotten weapons on youtube its not like youd think of a machinegun today but it actually looks like a minigun except of course without a motor to spin the barrels and all that with 7 barrels its pretty crazy i didnt even think they had that kind of gun back then but really look it up its amazing
1
@undeadarmy8847 the way they function with different fire modes but otherwise theyre the exact same
1
@The8thblock they wont backpedal at all though theyll stay stuck in their ways cause they argue with feelings and emotions and opinions instead of facts
1
@adamknight5887 wow youre an idiot they had literal machineguns back close to the time the constitution was written look up flintlock machinegun on forgotten weapons on youtube and see how stupid what you just said was
1
@ronsmith251 wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@iowasmoothy they dont argue with logic and reasoning they argue with emotions and feelings you cant get through to libbies with it
1
@ronsmith251 they dont get that though cause they argue with feelings and emotions instead of facts and reasoning so theyll never come to the right side and see the truth
1
@ronsmith251 they can read it they just dont care what it actually means they argue with feelings and emotions not facts and reasoning
1
@nickclarke5900 i really hope thats a joke cause its really stupod but even if it is please stop cause we dont need more idiots believing that kinda crap
1
@rustyclam5512 not by idiots you mean a firearm is a firearm no matter if is blackpowder or smokeless or refaurdless of its caliber etc like that the government doesnt classify it as that cause even soft modern body armor makes them useless to be used against them the wearer would probly barely even notice if they were hit wearing it
1
@Timenaught or how or what ammo they can shoot or what accessories they can have on it etc like that or that they have to have licenses to own them or have to have licenses to sell them or where you canuse them or how you use them you fet my point they cant limit them in any way shape or form or after any amount of time or whos in charge at the time or anything
1
@Jamie_Ray12 you cant get rid of all guns/weapons ever cause bad guys will always get them one way or the other and will always do harm with them cause they dont care about the "laws" the only thing that stops bas guys is good guys with them and that are willing to use them so the bad guy either thinks twice about doing something bad or wishes they had and gets shot
1
@blackbeaniemanhopkins4333 uhh what?
1
@Jamie_Ray12 uhh what?
1
@lordofcheeseballs thats not the only thing different about it but you have a point its just their emotions that they argue with not facts and reasoning so theyll never see the light arguing logic with them
1
@johnycakes6613 just cause some people got hurt a few times cause of some idiot that did that doesnt mean no one should be able to again its like punishing everyone with the second amendment by not allowing certain weapons for everyone or even no weapons at all cause some idiot killed a bunch of innocent people or even one innocent person you cant punish everyone for the actions of a few you punish those who cause something bad if they cause something bad
1
@Timenaught it definately is the truth
1
@TheNajSD k bud whatever you say 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@TheNajSD no thats the comment i make when pretty much if not everything you said is wrong and you wont admit it
1
@josephcremeans and so we can limit their power cause if we're armed and willing to use it then they dont have any power over us they want all guns/weapons "banned" not just whatever the best weapon we have now is that they havent took yet
1
@TheSchmed dont even joke about that we dont need more idiots believing this bullcrap
1
@ascarmen42 but they dont care about that they argue with feelings and emotions instead of facts and reasoning so theyll never see the light
1
@KingdomOfApple and alot more useful than bolt actions or pump actions etc like that for the purpose we should be using them and actually alot better weapons for: fighting tyranny like when they try to take our guns/weapons
1
@TheSchmed id rather not he hit at all if youre gonna say something like that the point is they arent supposed to be alllowed to take any of our guns/weapons regaurdless of what they are
1
@lueysixty-six7300 the main reason you cant take guns/weapons is the second amendment but it does no good to have if we dont fight back physically to keep it like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@lueysixty-six7300 wow 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
1
@josephcremeans k whatever you say grammar nazi
1
@reaperox_ they do no damage to people wearing modern body armor maybe to a completely unarmored target they could so a good amount of damage but even then its still not as much as a modern firearm take a .50 bmg for example they can blow off an entire limg and the temperary wound cavities they leave are bigger than the body theyd be going into so if you got shot in the arm say goodbye to that arm or even a smaller caliber like a .308 can do massive damage way more than a musket hit the heart or vital organs and its gonna mess you up really bad or anywhere actually for that matter but modern day armor makes even the newer guns pretty weak in conparison soft body armor today would stop pretty much all if not all blackpowder threats other than like explosive ammo from a huge black powder gun like a cannon and maybe even stop that if its just the shrapnel youd have to get a direct hit on a person even with a blackpowder explosive cannon ball to have an effective hit we have to have the modern stuff to fight the government with cause i assure you they wont be using outdated gear like we would have if we allow then to tell us what we can and cabt have weaponwise which is why the second amendment was written in the first place but if we dont use it as intended to fight back physically theb it does no good to say we have it cause tyrabts dont care unless made to by force
1
@ryanwaller4670 it still would be if modern armor even soft armor wouldnt stop it any armored targets that are in the military make black powder/muskets/cannons etc thats blackpowder useless thats why they dont even regulate them as firearms cause they know you couldnt hurt or kill anyone in the military with thise unless theyre completely unarmored or have a spot where theyre completely unarmored but they wont be unarmored cause theyre the military thats kinda their job to be armed amd armored and fight
1
@shrillcrayfish6168 no just no i know its a joke but thats definately not what they intended with the second amendment and i also know we dont need more idiots believing that kinda bullcrap
1
@reaperox_ not today they wouldnt theyd more than likely take you to jail for having the weapons than congradulate you for defending yourself from the bad guys
1
@71duece56 im glad you said "by that logic" even though theres no logic at all trying to argue that when they just say "press" and not "certain types of press" or anything else that could limit what you can do with press
1
@chuckaddison5134 and it didnt do a thing to stop bad guys from getting them cause theyll just make them or steal them or buy them from someone else who doesnt follow the "laws" that they "pass" against them and also you can still get black powder firearms through the mail if theyre "not readily convertable to smokeless powder" cause they dont regulate those like firearms (yet anyway cause i know they want to "ban" all guns/weapons they just havent gotten to that yet) im not saying thats any type of advantage or getting around anything cause it isnt like i said they havent gotten around to "banning" it yet theyre taking it slow and demonizing the best thing we have at the time then wheb they get people on board with that then they mobe on to the next thing and then the next until we have nothing left to fight back with and we're really close to that already since we keep just caving and going by the more and more new "laws" they keep "passing" instead of fighting back physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@knightatthecrossroads222 it is their minds like you said it may not be evil intents in all their minds wven if what theyre doing is evil the people in charge convince them that its for a good cause even when it isnt always like in nazi germany or any of the communist countries did and then slaughtered millions of their own innocents cause they were led to beliebe that if they gave up their weapons theyd be safer and that the government would protect them when they did the exact opposite and killed them thats whats happening here and therell be another holocaust but here in america if we dont start fighting back physiclly like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
The Gallows theyr brainwashed into thinking the cops/military will protect them and like you said that the government wont become corrupt or the outsiders wont invade and all that orher bullcrap they constanly push on us until we cave like we have been for about a century now if not more with their so called "laws" they "pass" instead of using the second amendment like you said to be able to effectively fight them back with all the weapons they have
1
@Stellar-Cowboy uhh what?
1
@vanad1um665 unless used in a war but if youre going by that definition a knife would be so i definately wouldnt go by that logic thats just an "excuse" for them to "ban" them they know theyre not "weapons of war" thats just what thy want you and all the stupid people they preach to to believe so youll be on their side about "banning them" even the actual weapons they use we should be able to have cause of the second amendment
1
@vanad1um665 its not intimindating to anyone who knows anyrhing about them or that theyre just inanimate objects tha can do nothing without an outside force and how are what color or what its made of scary? that makes no sense whatsoever only idiots like i said are scared of them for those reasons a gun is a tool and can be used for good or bad it depends on whos pulling the trigger not what type of gun it is no gun is good or evil the person behind it is good or evil
1
@vanad1um665 acyually they would cause their enemies would have full autos most likely and its not a higher fire rate its a different fore mode that allows you to shoot faster than you could with a semiauto with full auto or burst fire modes theres a reason they dont use semiautos other than in "dmrs" or "sniper" rifles
1
@Doodle Flop its not meant to be logical cause if it was tey wouldnt "ban" anything or want it "banned" cause of the second amendment they want to be able to control you completely and they cant do that if youre armed as well as the military and willing to use it thats the whole point of the second amendment but it doesnt work if we just keep caving to their new "laws" instead of physically fighting to be ale to keep our rights
1
@adamjbaker5582 the stupid people do the smart people should be fighting all this bullcrap physically like the whole point if the second amendment is in the forst place cause tyrants arent gonna be made to care unless we do (again the whole point of the second amendment)
1
@df9679 they dont understand that cause they dont argue with logic and reasoning they argue with emotions and feelings theyll never see the light
1
@vanad1um665 wow youre an idiot if we went by the second amendment instead of their bulcrap they call "laws" then wed still have all that stuff and even if we dont wars arent always won by superior technology alone look at nazi germany for example they had alot of more advanced stuff than the allies and russia and japan etc but they had so many people to fight against and so little resources that they couldnt sustain fighting against them through the whole war
1
@hardbumpy8400 theres not too much difference in the two like you said theyre the same gun but with different firemodes or if you mean ar-10s or higher or lower calibers then the only change is the size to accomadate a bigger caliber i undeestand the terms being different for the different modes or calibers or whatever but it really isnt that much difference not saying we shouldbt be able to have them we definately should but thats why and how they confuse people into wanting to "ban" them cause they look and can function pretty similar to the actual ones they use same fire rate even if you put a bumpfire stock or something else to make it be able to shoot that fast and again im not for "banning" any weapon for any reason im just saying thats how they confuse the stupid people they preach to into thinking theyd be "banning" something they arent so theyd be in board with it
1
@hardbumpy8400 it already is just a modification just like the m4 or ar-10 or any other variant of an ar-15 same basic parts but one just has some added to add a different fire mode or modes or the caliber changes
1
@willard6612 im for guns/weapons and im sure theres more than two even if its very few more than two but yeah alot of people here are total idiots and dont know a thing about guns/weapons or the second amendment and why it was written and all that stuff
1
@Jpizzle_x you can do that in real life too and they mean like actual weapons they use in war like the ones they choose to use not just ones that anyone picks up to use im not for them or whatever im just saying what they mean and you cant really use that definition when talking about our rights to guns/weapons cause the second amendment just says "arms" (which just means weapons not certain kinds")
1
@reaperox_ wow youre an idiot yes maybe on completely unarmored targets but even soft body armor today makes them completely useless on any modern battlefield youd need like a direct hit from an explsive cannon ball even on a human to have any effect with a blackpowder style weapon theyre not gonna be unarmored nowadays or at least bot completely unarmored theres only non vital spots that will be open more than likely also at range even with a rifled musket they have way better guns that way outrange and out damage them so youd get sniped before you could even get close enough to accurately shoot them with a musket thats the most retarded argument ive ever heard
1
@LadyMaria_AstralClocktower wow youre an idiot
1
@reaperox_ thats one military the other ones arent that stupid or there arent too many that are and id say when they start getting totally demolished in any wars theyd start issuing them unless like i said theyre that stupid not to issue armor at that point
1
@shrillcrayfish6168 and like i said its not just cause they believe what they believe its cause of the decisions they make because of what they believ and of youre making them believe that then thats making them do things like want to "ban" our weapons all of them and they have been doing that because we havent been fighting back against them physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place and just cave to what they want its alot more serious than that and we cant "just live how we want and do what we want" unless we do physicaly fight against them because they believe that crap and they have police officers and military who will enforce those beliefs on us again like i said if we dont fight physically like the second amendment intends
1
@shrillcrayfish6168 also im not the one being a dick here im trying to show the importance of what im saying and it isnt just calling them stuff cause i dont like what they say or whatever those are those ideals if they try to do that stuff
1
@LadyMaria_AstralClocktower what you said 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
1
@LadyMaria_AstralClocktower im not gonna read back through the comments but whatever it was was stupid
1
@nathanbryant53 theres never a time when that was all that existed and even if it was it doesnt change how they wrote the second amendment to say "arms" which just means weapons and not just cetain ones so even if that was the case they still dont have any kind of argument for "banning" any weapon for any reason
1
@boostio4619 doesnt matter wither way cause the second amendment just says "arms" which means weapons and not just certain ones
1
@Jamie_Ray12 just cause they didnt use it to help before now doesnt mean they wont ever have to or cant or something wont happen that they do have to idiot its an in case type thing not like every day youre going to need it and you cant plan for when you need it cause you dont know whats going to happen every single day thats why you carry it all the time
1
@John5.56 and type of gun its fired from and of they have armor or not and a distance away they are theres a ton of different factors that make them powerful or not
1
@peterwelch5691 theyre just at that point right now they want to "ban" all guns/weapons to be honest its just a slow boiling frog situation they try demonizing one thong at a time until nothings left (if we keep allowing it i mean by going by the "laws" they "pass" and not fighting those more and more "laws" they "pass" physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place)
1
@Jack-vt1yv a little correction most of them are the ones in the government hust mislead them by saying stupid stiff cause they know they can cause the stupid people dont know any better and it looks better on them when they have a bunch of people supporting them to the stupid people so they get more stupid people and they get police who will enforce whatever so called "laws" they "pass" just cause theyre paid to do it not cause its their actual job they should be doing and we havent been fighting it physically to keep our rights like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
1
@John5.56 not neccsarily if that bullet is made of softer materials like lead only it wont penetrate as well and will break up with so much speed there way more variables than speed that accounts for the power of the round
1
@noahbreece5643 id rather not be shot at all but muskets wouldnt do crap to days armor even soft body armor plus theyre not as accurate as todays and dont have as much range or power theres no way you could argue for muskets being in any way better than modern weapons we should have wverything they have and no weapons "banned" for any reason cause if the second amendment
1
@TheNajSD k whatever you say idiot
1
@LadyMaria_AstralClocktower yeah* i am right
1
@peterfitswell535 what do you mean?
1
@John5.56 definately the latter because stupid people will believe anything theyre told of they say theyre "experts" said it was true and in reality they want all guns/weapons "banned" so they can control everything everyone does and yhey fant do that if youre just as well armed and willing to use those weapons to stop their tyranny so they try to decieve everyone into giving them up and those who dont they threaten jailtime or death and then when they know for sure who wont give them up they start just killing them and now its alot easier for them to do that because we've been giving up so many of our rights as they "pass" more "laws" against the second amendment and we just keep caving to them because of the fear of that happening thats how they work they decieve and make you fear them to make you do what they want take that away from them and they have no power over us but it will only happen if we fight physically like we should and like the whole point of the second amendment is again like i said before
1
@jeremyjohnson8882 its to make the stupid people fear it and want it "banned" the smart people know better and will fight physically to keep all their rights but no ones been doing it for a century now if not more when the whole point of the second amendment is to foght physically against their so called "laws" that would be tyrannical like taking our weapons or freedom of soeech etc rhat are in the constitution and are all there to limit the power of the government but again like i said it does work unless we use the second amendment as intended to keep them in check by physically fighting it
1
@lancehorrocks1305 background checks dont stop people from killing people or gettigg weapons to do it with that last part you said does though if people had all the guns/weapons the military has abd were willing to use them there would be little to no crime cause itd either make the bad guys think twice or wish they had either way is better than being disarmed and solely relying on the police to protect you when they cant or wont get there in time to do something about it
1
@SpeeDemon2005 its not even just no evidence its cause they dont understand or dont care about the whole poiny of the second amendment and thats to fight tyrannical "laws" that would take our rights like our weapons and to be able to protect ourselves from whatever threats might come with whatever weapons we please and without any kind of limit on how we can own them or what kind of ammo etc like that or not having to have licenses for certain ones or taxes for certain ones to own them etc you get my point they cant be limited in any way other than like the actual stuff that should be illegal like if you stole it or if you committed a crime thats actually bad enough to make it to where you shouldnt be able to own it like murder or rape or assault etc
1
@thiccchungo1041 yeah and they also werent armored at all like today though today a blunderbuss would be useless wven soft body armor today would stop it cold and the wearer would barely notice they were hit so theres really no arguing that a musket or any of that older tech like that would stand any chance today today we should be able to have all of what the military has cause yhe second amendment was intentionally worded "arms" (which just means weapons not just certain ones)
1
@jj3449 they also had machineguns whether they were used or not isnt the point the point is they had that technology way back then just look up flintlock machinegun on forgotten weapons on youtube its crazy it looks like a minigun but without the motor and all that to make the barrels spin cause its a flintlock action its not what youd think of as a machinegun today but they had them even back then when it was written so that whole "they only had muskets" or "they couldntve imagined tech advancing past that" etc that they try to say doesnt hold weight
1
@davidscadden9784 they arent using it cause of its scary looks to be honest its cause its the best thing we have now so they demonize it then move onto something else thats not as good and make it sound like the most dangerous thing and then the next after they take that etc until we have nothing left cause they know they cant take it all at once no one would support them if they did or if they do support them theyre just that stupid to
1
@Dexteritas55 they has machineguns around the time of the comstitution being signed literally look up flintlock machinegun on forgotten weapons on youtube it looks like a minigun but obviously doesnt have a motor and all that cause its a flintlock
1
@mikeO31082 not the whole society just the government and the people who are stupid enough to go by their so called "laws" they "pass" that are unconstitutional
1
@dochollywood4576 they dont care about that though they argue with feelings and emotions not facts and reasoning so theyll never see the light or change their minds
1
@A Messenger from the South you should be able to have it full auto with the second amendment and actually alot better weapons than both of them because it says "arms" not "certain arms" or anything else that could limit it in any way etc like that
1
@chasgalaxy6721 doesnt matter if they still were cause the second amendment just says "arms" not "certain arms" or anything else that can limit it in any way like that
1
@blank-vj1mc kinda does when theyre not used anymore cause theyre outdated thats what people mean by "weapons of war" the ones they chose now to fight with not the old ones or just something they pick up randomly or whatever
1
@chasgalaxy6721 wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😒
1
@Collective_Unconscious_ so what if they have it doesnt make the second amendment change that we cant have whatever weapons we please any way we please without any limitations
1
@sdot7941 and how it says "arms" not certain arms or firearms or anything else that would make the types limited or the ammo they shoot limited or having to have licenses or taxes on cany of them or anything else the government says you ""need" for it to be "legal""
1
Willie Cooke you could if you can find one and have the money just find it on the private market instead of a "legal" gunstore where you have to have it registered to you
1
@zfortenb1237 it means a well trained and well armed populace who will fight the tyrannical government is what it means
1
@zfortenb1237 yes actually it is
1
@dannymiller3315 bo one makes him look like albert einstein im pretty sure but there are alot of really stupid people
1
@peterfitswell535 google what? also you didnt answer my question i asked what you meant by you think i sent my message to the wrong person
1
@peterfitswell535 i saidwhat it was i said what did you mean you think i sent my message to the wrong person?
1
@chasgalaxy6721 oo bud whatever you say if you mean me cause im definately not an idiot and im definately sensible
1
@chasgalaxy6721 yeah no you have no idea what youre talking about
1
@peterfitswell535 pretty sure i didnt
1
@dustinhaus1165 its because we dont fight physically to keep our arms not just cause they "pass" "laws" against the second amendment/constitution its nore our faults for not doing our jobs and regulating their power than it is theirs for abusing it cause thats what tyrants do and what i said we should be doing is what we should be doing you cant just blame it all on them wheb the whole point of the second amendment is for us to fight the tyranny physically but wont
1
@ceeph36 noe of them are but it doesnt matter if we dont actually use them to fight back with physically cause tyrants dont play by those rules/laws and it doesnt matter how anyone interprets it it matters only what it says and like you said they shouldnt be allowed to limit any weapons in any way or for any reason etc like that but again like i said again if we dont fight physically againt these so called "laws" then it does no good to just tell them we have the second amendment
1
@dustinhaus1165 the militia is citizens idiot not a formal army its anyone who will fight a tyrannical government
1
@djjaysky9071 or three round burst or sometimes even other types and if youre talking about an ar-10 its just a scaled up version of the ar-15 for a bigger round
1
@ceeph36 and it doesnt say certain ones are banned or certain accesories or certain ammo etc like that or that the government can make you have to have licenses or taxes to be able to own them or any way of liniting them in any way or after any amount of time or after any certain person is in charge you get my point it pre empts change in any way
1
@dustinhaus1165 the insividuals make up the militia and "arms" just means weapons not certain ones so its not about "extreme situations"
1
Paul Robinson they wont be if we keep caving to their more and more new "laws" they "pass" that keep takong more and more of our rights we have to actually physically fight this crap they didnt say we could have all the weapons we want just to be able to have them or to be able to hunt or whatever lame excuse the lefties want you to believe its for or that they can limit it in any way for any reason
1
@Grumpy Old Farts Riding Club not really usually when people say that they mean what they choose to use modern day not what they used to use and if you go by that definition we wouldnt have anything cause even knives are used in war or have been and even if they are it doesnt matter or shouldnt matter cause the second amendment says we should have any weapon we please without any limitations but it only works if we actually use it as intended to fight physically against their bullcrap "laws"
1
@zfortenb1237 wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
1
@dalton5160 im thinking they had like huge bows called ballistas too and catapults and stuff like that at the time i dont think bows and arrows were ever "the pinnacle of weapons" to be honest
1
@jhanks2012 being destroyed is pretty well well defeating them dont you think? cause if theyre destroyed then they cant fight back that sounds alot like defeat
1
@jhanks2012 i know that last part ive known that for a long time and the only thing you really have to know when talking about that is the reason the second amendment was written and thats to take out tyrants and be as armed as they are to be able to effectively do that
1
@Mazintheconqueror guns/weapons* second amendment says "arms" and "shall not be infringed." (limited) period.
1
@Mazintheconqueror i know what the second amendments for dont have to tell me
1
eddiesaviary.com uhh no they dont theyre evil and only want whats best for them thats why theyre tyrannical 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
1
@mrwolf9957 they dont check and balance us at all really its our job to do that for them theyre supposed to only punish those who actually need punishing its not supposed to be innocents but we've been not doing our job for way too long making sure that doesnt happen
1
@patroscher6240 dude it has nothing to do with interpetations and yes actually it does mean individuals and those individuals make up the militia if you understand anything about it at all then understand the last part that says what right its protecting the first part just says why its protecting it and the second says what right its protecting and for who and thats "the people" which is everyone outside the corrupt government who would fight the the tyranny physically therefore the militia also its not just guns its all weapons cause it says "arms" so we'd have all of what they have if we go by it and fight like we should to keep those rights and even now we definately could if we all came together to do it yes itd be much harder since we gave into what they said for so long but its still possible not all wars are won by superior tech alone look at ww2 as a good example with germany
1