Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1. jpc1918 the nazis tortured and killed people that didnt even work for them by the millions at least the russians were helping take the nazis out every nation has something bad that was going on its wartime what would you expect to happen?
    62
  2. Jack Frost wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️
    58
  3. Or the heckler and kalashnikov 32
    55
  4. i didnt even think they had crap like this to be honest i knew they had better but this is literally the equivelant of a minigun but back then
    53
  5. Caleb Hu how many times have you seen a minugun jam/not function? its all about how reliable the engine and build is and its pretty well built and reliable
    37
  6. also atf: shouldnt exist and should be fought against physically like the second amendment intends
    37
  7.  @Arcahnslight  it wont smooth over anything the atf shouldnt even exist cause of the second amendment
    29
  8. Constantine Joseph dude i think you mean the russians copied the stg 44 with the ak-47 not the americans with the m16 the only thing those two have in common is probly that the magazines hold 30 rounds and that its an intermediate power cartridge that they fire
    24
  9. or the hwatcha that was another weapon that was rapidfire like the minigun of back then and it was before this it was a primitive rocket launcher that fired them really fast
    22
  10.  @sethrich5998  we shouldnt have to go through any of this bullcrap like background checks or registration etc like that because of the second amendment but if we dont use it as intended to fight physically against the tyranny then it doesnt matter if we say we have the second amendment or not cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
    18
  11. almost all guns started as military or for royalty at first nowadays they make more for civilians than military cause the military is usually slow to adopt newer guns and usually just modernise what they have until they think its not good enough anymore or it actually isnt good enough anymore
    15
  12. M B you know terrorists/bad guys etc do that anyway and our government actually arms the people we are supposed to be fighting against such as isis etc also even if they do get these things we'd have the same or more to fight back with so it doesnt really matter if the bad guys have them thats kinda the whole point of the second amendment to be able to take on whoever we should come up against
    15
  13.  @gabberpietor  not when you mean like liquifying like they do
    14
  14. i just saw another forgotten weapons video where he was literally showing a flintlock machine gun
    14
  15. Monotech2.0 you dont have to find them thats the point luty was making stuff from a hardware store can make a working smg
    14
  16. it is it plays the song of freedom
    13
  17. Alessandro Depetri shoulda fought for your right to keep them whether you have a constituion like ours or not tyranny should bever be accepted
    13
  18. N!TR0Jackalope i dont know if they responded that way or not exactly but yeah thats what its there for for people to be able to defend themselves from who or whatever they come across that tries to harm them whether that be government thugs or regular street thugs or a charging animal etc that would hurt them and do it with whatever they pleased or feel they needed to do it with i mean think about if everyone didnt go by the so called "laws" they "pass" nowadays how much less crime there would owning everything the military has criminals would definately think twice and even other armies that are our enemies definately wouldnt want to invade us but people wont because they fear the big government and military/police that theyd go to jail or be killed
    13
  19. twistedyogert not really cause then theyd just do it with something else if they were actually that determined to kill themselves
    12
  20. no such thing as a "california or any other commie state compliant rifle" because their "laws" about this stuff are unconstitutional therefore null and void of power of law
    12
  21. Caleb Hu not saying it couldnt or you wouldnt need a battery but thats what reliability is it doesnt jam/stop working nothing will be 100% reliable no matter how simple like even cartridges the guns fire if the get moisture inside the rounds turn into paperweights
    12
  22. it wouldnt explode if a hipoint .45acp which is potmetal for the slide wont and this is actual steel
    10
  23.  @I_like_turtles_67  probly more deadly actually considering an ar is only a .223 caliber bullet versus a probly .70 or .50 caliber or something close to that ball or you know cannons with way bigger balls than that
    10
  24. Black Templar they dont actually care about hunting its just an excuse or they think it is to ban things they dont want you having which is actually all weapons
    10
  25.  @shauny2285  and the fact that we dont use the second amendment as intended to fight back physically against the tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    9
  26. BaldursLicht its not funny either way itd be awesome to have a full auto setting just in case you needed it in close quarters
    9
  27. Nathan Brown also the fact that this exists like they said this is the equivelant of a minigun back then when the rest of the people were most likely using single loading muskets
    9
  28. M B youre thinking way too much into whats being said and yes i know people can turn but more than likely it doesnt happen like that and there would be other people to notice that and fire back on you for doing that like i said good people having the weapons makes the bad people having them even out and it would rain down back on them or if they saw them theyd stop it before that could even happen
    9
  29. @anOKlamp actually it is and its cause of the super slow rate of fire
    9
  30. kinda ffunny too since the reason they didnt really use lever actions too much cause you couldnt shoot em prone as well as bolt actions
    8
  31. yeah i thought the same when i saw the video about the flintlock machinegun if the politicians knew about that id say theyd just give up tryng to make stuff illegal or if not theyd want to try banning it too but you know i forgot they wabt every type of weapon banned which is literally anything cause anything can be weaponized if used in a certain way i mean just look at an atom bomb it takes the tiniest thing and causes the most destruction of any weapon we have today
    8
  32. PurpleNoodleFace alot of people are serious when they say crap like that they dont understand what logic is or what would realistically happen cause they learn from other people who dont know or intentionally lie to them or from stuff they see on movies dont assume everything you see that sounds stupid but you think is a joke is a joke ive literally seen people who legitimately argue with this crap
    8
  33. Nathan Brown thats not the point they dont care about destructive power they just want you disarmed period even if its a knife look at the uk you cant even carry a butter knife on you...
    8
  34. Michael Woods dude back in the day people had the smarts to make this and it wouldnt be any more expensive than buying the muskets they had and modifying a bunch together into one of these things and im sure they could and did buy these cause they didnt have the stupid "laws" we have nowadays there were no "civilian" vs "military" weapons just like still today weapons are just weapons who uses them are irrelevant to what type they are just cause the military uses them most often or at all doesnt make them ""military" weapons""
    8
  35. oneandy2 so its not the problem with him its the problem with the government
    8
  36. WrathMachine it sounds kinda like what the aa-12 in the expendables sounded like
    7
  37. @anOKlamp youve never seen the grease gun then heh
    7
  38. this is about the equivelant of the gustav rail gun but back then
    6
  39. Voor Naam wow youre an idiot obama was a commie and if we didnt have term limits this place wouldve been turned into all of the U.S. being like chicago
    6
  40. Shaun wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️
    6
  41. it is it stops whoever you need to shoot with it
    6
  42. Square Body Chevys this thing is basically a minigun just not beltfed and motor driven with modern cased ammo this would be the equivelant of one back then if you ask me especially going against other people who more than likely only had single loading muskets
    6
  43. Alexsis Engle 30 just means you can shoot all the mag with one trigger pull (full auto) 1 means shooting 1 at a time per trigger pull semiauto simple
    5
  44. Six Shooter DhSprts cause you didnt have the stupid "laws" we have now and people who will go by them the "laws" made them scarce so people who go by that line of thought will pay whatever price people ask
    5
  45. Libertus Primus its perfect for it cause the people youre gonna be defending it from will definately have that and more kinda the whole point of the second amendment where it says "shall not be infringed." period.
    5
  46. Captain Cannabis "law"* cause its not really the law cause of the second amendment
    5
  47. Skulgar321 bf1 used literally unique and one of a kind or very few of that certain gun made in some cases like the hellriegel like it was commonly used in combat all the time
    5
  48. PsychoLucario you know someone could just make that long of a barrel for that gun he used right? but it would actually make the bullet slow down cause of friction especially on a revolver thats .38 special
    5
  49. nah recreational tanks etc that we should be able to own without any infringements like taxes that we have to pay to the government etc
    5
  50. biden or any of the lefts chronies are idiots that know nothing about guns at all and definately shouldnt be making laws or even statements about guns
    5
  51. Owlly Mannstein with a gun this awesome i dont think gun guys would care about how long it takes to load compared to how long you can shoot it i would know im a gun guy
    5
  52. Steve Campbell m1 garands are 30-06 dude don’t need to reload just buy 30-06
    5
  53. no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    5
  54. Damian Reaves both are horrible the problem is they punish everyone by banning inanimate objects punishing everyone instead of punishing only those who break the laws like they should
    5
  55. Bede O’Dempsey only the people who would go by those so called "laws" lost them the "criminals" still have them
    5
  56. Judge Dredd "outdated" lol and what does the time period have to do with anything about what people use as an insult? that makes no sense
    5
  57. strider04 ok bud youre really being stupid now even experienced gunsmiths could have that happen thats why you dont test them unsafely
    5
  58. QwertyBoredom122 christians are persecuted everywhere and the news media would rather show the evil people as the victims instead of the innocents to make us look bad
    5
  59. lol
    5
  60.  @fifteen8850  not all new tech is more reliable than old tech i have a mauser .32 acp pocket pistol that automatically loads a new round in when you put the mag in and it works perfectly
    5
  61. CJ the devil bayonets will never be obsolete you always need something better than your fists when you run out of ammo im surprised we dont have lightsabers attached to our guns yet
    4
  62. in the geneva convention they banned that kind of knife or spike bayonets that had multiple direction blades cause they cant be sewn up or so im told doesnt really make sense in war where people are getting blown up and everything else but call that "inhumane" lol or like how germany in ww1 wanted to ban shotgun use "cause it was too powerful"
    4
  63. just the rod? thats ridiculous you could buy 3 barrett m82s for that he really suckered someone in selling someone a rod for 30,000 dollars
    4
  64. Timothy White its still real steel im sure it should still hold together
    4
  65. everything is "illegal" in commiefornia
    4
  66. Hideika its legal regaurdless the second amendment applies to all states whether the corrupt government says it does or not is irrelevant
    4
  67. it doesnt help anyone but the people trying to control us by disarming us
    4
  68. Glenn Brymer it still should today but we have idiots inside and outside the government/military/law enforcement that frown upon that and the people outside wont fight it
    4
  69. iambiggus i assume sarcasm? because they will always have access if they want because there are people in a thing called the black market that dont care about laws about selling to people who definately shouldnt have guns
    4
  70. tbobay nfa and any laws that put limits on any weapon of any kind are actually null and void cause of the second amendment the way its written
    4
  71. Dj d a chauchat is 8mm lebel or 30-06 if its the american one so itd probly actually be a lot louder than thunder
    4
  72.  @garybower1824  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    4
  73. strider04 lol whatver you say bud it might take a while but someone could figure it out
    4
  74. strider04 people woulda made their own tools back then even today people do it im sure brandon harrera didnt used to know how but everyone can learn how that wants to it just takes testing what works and what doesnt
    4
  75. bastardsergeantminor egpyts government doesnt like christians and most if not all other places even americans corrupt government doesnt like christians and their values and beliefs and they paint us as the bad guys and the bad guys as the victims and there are people that are stupid enough believe them which is alot and its the reason little to no good happens anymore cause too little so called "good people" dont stand up to them and the whole "offensive" thing is just one of the many excuses they use against us they argue with feelings and emotions not facts and reasoning
    4
  76. Davis Tuck or peoples imaginations especially when it comes to homemade weapons manufacture anything can be weaponized even an atom split one and its a huge explosion "shrugs"
    4
  77. Andrew Cox does it really matter? literally anything can be weaponized in some way is the point
    4
  78. Jack Andersen itll never be obsolete cause you always need something better than your fists when you run out of ammo completely im surprised we dont have lightsabers on the end of our guns by now
    3
  79. James Kelsch theyre actually alot better than people think theyre tough as tanks all the people hating on them only care about looks and cheap materials and cheap to buy brand new and theyre actually pretty accurate cause the barrel doesnt move since theyre all blowback
    3
  80. cocoиuт i didnt mean they copied it directly more like copied the idea with an intermediate cartridge and 30 round magazines as a standard that kind of thing
    3
  81. cocoиuт no... just no i was talking about one specific gun being copied from the idea of another gun by one specific country
    3
  82. Dangerous Amoeba im just surprised we dont have lightsaber bayonets at this point instead of a metal blade
    3
  83. Donald Meaker the reason for that is it cant be sewn up or at least id think thats why they banned it in the geneva convention which actually makes no sense its war none of it is humane but anyway thats what they did doesnt have to make sense really to do it
    3
  84. Trey Westcot cant really revoke a non existent law but i lnow what you mean making the government see its not even a real law cause of the second amendment
    3
  85. Ronan B youre a complete idiot if you believe any of what you just said
    3
  86. Ronan B youre a complete idiot dude
    3
  87. Dan the man every actual american that knows better than to go by unconstitutional lies they call "laws" are exempt
    3
  88. Slow Bro theres no such thing as an "assault" anything
    3
  89. Dan the man if you go by the lies they call "laws" then yeah if you go by the constitutiona nd second amendment which is reality then yeah you can
    3
  90. Jack Andersen nope even since no gun law is actually a real law abywhere in the u.s. in reality cause of the second amendment but people need to foght physically against those who dont do their actual job and dont defend the constitution so they break their oath
    3
  91. Ivan Garcia dude climates or whatever isnt what the second amendment is or "training around it" its like you said you shouldnt have to deal with it the second amdendment is so you can stand alot better chance of fighting tyranny physically cause youre allowed to have any weapon you please without anything the government says "makes it "legal"" the second amendment says "shall not be infringed" not "shall not be infringed unless_____" or anything else to make it changeable for any reason
    3
  92. Not Pulverman it actually could be "normal civilian guns" cause technically the constitution says right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed not just certain guns
    3
  93. omniwing look at it this way its both and more cause each one has a 200 dollar tax stamp to go with it on top of it already being expensive to buy the gun and ammo if you go the "legal" route which isnt even really the legal route cause of the second amendment in which case you pay 200 dollars to the government to own a "destructive device" (anything over .50 caliber) and then 200 dollars on top of the 100 and something dollars each round if its stuff like explosive past a certain weight or amount thats in it
    3
  94. warpxppy yep but most people nowadays arent gun people and its a different kind than even not gunpeople only know from games or tv shows or movies
    3
  95. pretty sure it was an old ww2 g41 if you mean the sniper and the other gun she used was an ak-47 actually i take that back i looked it up it is the vz 58
    3
  96. subdued reader song*
    3
  97. 1423 171 doesnt matter that the stupid government interprets them as theyre still firearms and the second amendment makes their interpretations irrelevant is says the right of the people to keep and bear arms (which are weapons not short for firearms) shall not be infringed. an infringement is any limitation they would try to put on any weapon/weapon accessory because if they can ban an accessory they can ban all guns/weapons cause they would word it as anything that can fire a round (a trigger which is an accessorie) is banned therfore banning all guns
    3
  98.  @samuellubell4557  it's still a machinegun
    3
  99. looks can be decieving look up demo ranches torture tests on hi points lol people always think cheap means junk but simple is alot of the times better than complicated
    3
  100. Mrjohnnymoo1 this wasnt before democrats this is before people were dumb and let people even talk about banning inanimate objects "because bad guys use them" which isnt a valid reason for the fact that its dumber than rocks but more importanly the second amendment says "arms" which are all weapons not just certain ones
    3
  101. ONEIL311 what minds would they lose? they dont have one
    3
  102. Perry2186 no such thing as an assualt rifle just rifles
    3
  103. Ios5513 no such thing as "assualt rifles" just rifles
    3
  104. MaskMaster dude youre a liberal commie if you think regulated in this context means laws against what you can have a well refulated milita means well trained
    3
  105. zxggwrt gun owners boting didnt get us anywhere because trump either straight out lied or flip flopped because he went back on being pro gun under his administration bumpstocks were banned
    3
  106. Subversive Control thats not a deal at all you used to be able to buy this kinda stuff and alot more with nothing but the money it took to buy it no tax or anything and walk out with it
    3
  107. usbiv223 fighting the government thatd try to take it or regulate it in any way cause of the second amendment cause theyll have that and alot more so its be best to have the same weaponry as them to fight back with
    3
  108. Caboose 92m classic liberal "im a liberal but im all for the second amendment (but dont want this or that that goes against the constitution)"give me a break dude background checks dont stop jack squat or any "laws" for that matter criminals dont follow them so a few years in jail then getting right back out does nothing the chance of being killed by a good person with equal or more firepower makes them think twice about committing crimes or even if it doesnt and they have to use them thats less chance of anyone committing a crime cause theres less criminals to commit crimes thats how you lower the crime rate criminals arent scared of a little jail time
    3
  109.  @Strawberry92fs  all gun control "laws" are infringements including the stuff you said you support and they do no good cause actual bad guys wont go by them and will just steal or buy off the black market or make their own circumventing the so called "laws" so all it does is put a burden to have to wait to get a gun/weapon and in that time they could be killed/raped etc if someone is stalking them what are they supposed to do in that time they have to wait? just hope? that doesnt fly with any sane person or anyone thats actually pro second amendment and actually knows what it means to actually be pro second amendment it says "arms" (weapons and not just certain ones or just certain guns etc or having to have background checks etc to buy them or licenses for certain ones or taxes for certain ones) and "shall not be infringed."(limited if you dont know what infringed means) period. no ifs ands or buts to make it changeable for any reason or after any amount of time etc like that and all of what you said would be a limit to the second amendment therefore cant be an actual law amd should be fought against physically
    3
  110.  Ben Siener  all machineguns/weapons should be "recreational" until we need them to fight tyranny like we do now and shouldve been fighting for a long time now but too many people are too scared or brainwashed to fight back against them and just keep caving to the more and more "laws" they "pass" so we just keep losing more and more freedoms until we have none left and nothing left to fight back physically with to get them back its a slow boiling frog type situation they know they cant take it all at once cause then too many people would see their true plan so they just keep brainwashing people into believing theyre not losing any rights and are being made safer when in reality they are losing rights and freedoms and are becoming less safe in every way
    3
  111. Matthew Caughey im sure there are leaders that are stupid enough nowadays even in not "thirdworld countries" and arent what people would consider "war criminal jokes of leaders"
    3
  112. Ian Furqueron i understand it would be alot to load a beltfed but this you have to load the actual powder and ammo for every shot it can fire with a beltfed its usually already assembled you just put the bullets into it
    3
  113. encarn and make sure its the right amount of ammo and make it alot faster to load and possibly prevent it from getting wet
    3
  114. John Smith well its not actually all the feds fault, yes they enforce it with their brainwashed army that think theyre doing the right thing but then again if we just all said screw their unconstitutional "laws" and anyone who enforces them what could they do against 350 million people who all owned what we should be able to own (which is anything the army can and does own)
    3
  115. WBtimhawk it was to hold the weight of 14 barrels not to be tactical
    3
  116. Sean I’d rather have the modern version of this idea it’s called cornershot
    3
  117. it wouldnt be an "assault" musket itd be called a mini musket instead of minigun i mean look at the thing thats the equivelant of a minigun today back then
    3
  118. if anyone ever argues they couldnt have imagined machine guns back then show them this this is the perfect example that they could and did imagine machine guns or other weapons in general
    3
  119. Erilen its just magazines not ammunition magazines that sounds so leftist idiocy no offense just thats really how they talk or saying like "magazine clip" or like jerry brown says a "30 caliber magazine clip" lol😂👌🏻
    3
  120. Thom itd be like a gatling gun except actually fully automatic and you cant stop it until its out of ammo or something else that would stop it
    3
  121. Olueni onLoppu it would probly just spin around and not hit anything or spin toward your own soldiers and cause friendly fire if its mounted like it was intended
    3
  122. Sérgio Henrique wow just wow they probly knew more than alot of people nowadays
    3
  123. thats literally all they do and its cause we let them by not fighting physically as the second amendment intends
    3
  124. Voor Naam "illegal" cause theyre not really cause of the second amendment
    3
  125. J B you know the atf bow classifies bumpfire stocks (just the sticks themselves bot even attached to a gun) a machinegun? its all just bullcrap excuses to "ban" more guns/weapons thats their ticket to banning semiautos and we just let it happen nect they'll go after bolt actions for being "sniper rifles" and shotguns theyll say "spread too much" and then the single shots theyll say "are too simple to use"
    3
  126.  @ME262MKI  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    3
  127.  @tombickers  🤦🏻‍♂️
    3
  128. Prof. Michael O. Zeee JCD ECS that could also be to fight tyranny and regain freedom if need be and actually theres a real demand for that in todays time
    3
  129. strider04 ok bud youre one of those idiots that thinks you have to have a little piece of paper to know what theyre doing and people make working guns all the time that arent professional gunsmiths or that actually know alot about guns mark serbu started as a machinist not really knowing anything about them like i said all it takes is the will to learn and try things and i never said they did all have a forge or that anyone was any smarter than anyone else i said people even today make guns homemade that wont blow up when you shoot them theres a guy that literally does this all the time his name is royal nonesuch on youtube
    3
  130. strider04 i dont care when you respond just saying you dont need a degree or be a "professional" to know how to build a homemade gun that wont explode alot of new gun designs that actually worked havent came from people who knew everything about how guns worked they were people who had hobbies or were machinists and like testing new things and making new things they havent tried before or were interested in the mechanics of making something like a gun work and stuff like that
    3
  131. strider04 ok whatever you say bud people could and did do that its no different than today other than what they wouldve used or how they wouldve learned to
    3
  132. Caleb Hu minigun*
    3
  133. Hale Bopp yeah but they never go by the actual religions teachings apparently or if they do its rarely most of them use pieces and parts to justify the evil they do
    3
  134. Andrew Martin wow youre a freaking idiot how do you know most dont? and everyone does and has sinned your point is invalid cause the bible even says no ones pefect and never will be thats why jesus died for our sins 🤦🏻‍♂️ also im not "playing the victim" or "whining" im pointing out facts and they dont change cause you think differently or anyone else or any amount of people thinking differently etc
    3
  135. 7.62 x39mm californian Government*
    3
  136. Monotech2.0 no just no
    3
  137. Monotech2.0 there arent less to be honest the cops dont even try cause they know there are too many despite the laws in place making it illegal
    3
  138. Bruh Perfect you think 7.62 is crazy? lol the russians have a 50 cal ""assault" rifle"
    3
  139. the plastic cased ammo and the shape and all that maybe if they made it with regular rimless semiauto type of ammo it could work if they remade it the reason they tryed the first thing i said was cause it supposedly held more ammo
    3
  140.  @joshuathomas8529  its not a brace for a pistol but they have straps to hold them to your arm is why they consider them ""pistol" braces"" its not a pistol id it fires rifle rounds and theres no such thing as an "sbr" cause you can get rifles from the factory any length you want theres no "standard length" its a made up term so they can charge you a tax on a certain thing if you allow them to make you by going by it and not foghting against it physically like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like thar
    3
  141.  @vilecreature8640  botomg doesnt do crap and isnt what the second amendment is intended for its because voting doesn effec tyrants at all only force does not voting or talking to them etc like that we've been doing that for way too long now and nothing changes cause they know they can just cheat and lie their way into office and do whatever they want to us cause theres no real consequences by voting or talking to them or whatever
    3
  142. STM wow youre an idiot what caused bad stuff for them is their dictators that killed millions of people under their rule learn from history so you dont repeat the bad parts of it
    2
  143. Riad Haidar the ak was more inspired by just the stg cause it was mostly stamped metal and the russians like that type weapon more cause it was simple like most orher weapons they made and its not long recoil like the m1garand its a piston operated gun
    2
  144. John Sanders cauterizing the wound doesnt have too much effect when you lose a hole body part easily and you dont think that machine couldnt be miniaturized and have some kind of power source that would sustain it? theyre always working on new technology theres stuff people couldntve imagined 10 years ago and alot of secretive stuff thats way more advanced than what the public will ever know about
    2
  145. John Sanders i wouldnt count on just saying "no secretive technology" thing im sure they have things like that that theyd never tell about and just cause i cant name any makes no sense cause im not the one making it they are
    2
  146. Sekeletu plastic doesnt turn to dust lol especially nowadays theres all kinds of plastic/polymer thats tougher than steel like carbon fiber
    2
  147. Raptor they dont explode unless you do something you definately shouldnt with it like putting something in the barrel that wont allow the bullet to exit so basically making a pipebomb out of it
    2
  148. Janus Kristensen so are the pistols watch matt from demoranch test em its crazy how reliable they are alot of people just think because theyre cheap built and cheap right out of the box that theyre junk or the way they look etc
    2
  149. M J i really hope thats a joke but even if it is its not funny
    2
  150. vilsiran the vulcan came way after this lol and pretty sure its 20mm which makes a 45-70 govt look really small and a wussy round lol
    2
  151. depends what air rifle you mean there are ones that almost literally a .22lr they have .22 caliber projectiles, rifled barrels and shoot about the speed of a .22 lr and sound about like a .22lr when shot maybe a little quieter cause its air instead of an explosion but still
    2
  152. GabDubé you know kevlar wont stop any type of rifle round right? thats why they use steel and other harder metals and even a crossbow or bow type weapon makes it useless its nade for stopping the usual fmj pistol threats and thats about it even small fast moving pistol rounds could get through it unless you stacked so many layers that its too heavy to wear would it ever stop a rifle round or small fast pistol round
    2
  153. GenericFakeName there will never be a full body suit thats wearable and able to take anything thats thrown at it something will always be able to take them out even a 50 bmg is enough to go through or at least still have power enough to very badly hurt you if not go all the way through the armor and the military has weight constraints cause of all the other stuff they have to carry in addition to the weight of the armor and they have to take cost into account cause of the vehicles and gas for those vehicles and ammo for the weapons and all the other expenses of war
    2
  154. B W theres always going to be something that can penetrate or even if it doesnt still be able to badly hurt you enough to take you out of the fight there will never be a full body suit that can tank anything and keep the wearer completely unharmed a 50 bmg could just about tear through any full body suit you could ever make thatd be light enough to actually wear
    2
  155. Син Ин Цын its not like they couldntve thought of that back then they literally had a flintlock machinegun back then or somewhere a little before or after this gun
    2
  156.  @shawnfreeoftyranny8849  but tyrants dont care what it actually means thats the whole point that it was written to have all the fire power the government has to be able to fight the tyranny effectively but it only works if we actually do
    2
  157.  @Klaaism  yeah its a shame people didnt like new technology that was better but it was also probly way more expensive to produce and get resources for too thats alot of the reason newer technologies arent always adopted
    2
  158. keith moore your fists can be a weapon ya know even an atom is a weapon split one and boom!
    2
  159. Fire Power701 todays technology makes any kind of zepplin obsolete
    2
  160. planescaped they dint care what it would solve or not they inly care that you be disarmed so they can do whatever they please with you
    2
  161. TheWayabo having a permit from the government is exactly the reason the second amendment was written you dont have to have permission from the government to own anything the only reason people go by it is threat of death or jail time also self defense from two legged menaces are also a valid reason to own a gun regaurdless of what the government says
    2
  162. 2spooky 4me its not even really restricted people have just been breainwashed and probly not taught the second amendment (at least if youre in america or in other places that are supposed to be able to own weapons (of any kind too cause it says "arms" not firearms and its not short for it arms means weapons)
    2
  163. basil tozer they dont trust anyone or they wouldnt make it to where we need their permission to own a firearm or have to register it or give it up theres a saying and thats when the government fears the people there is freedom and when they dont there isnt
    2
  164. Komodo Gaming too many people dont know or care about if they do the constitution and even in countries where they dont have that they should still fight governments that are that way taking or trying to take peoples guns and self defense from the bad people of the world
    2
  165. Lillu we actually dont have any gun/weapon "laws" to be honest if you know what the constitution and second amendment says and means
    2
  166. Timothy White i dont think you realise there are .45s that are blowback only and the slide is made of potmetal called a hi point
    2
  167. HockeyTown Luv if the brazing is in places that take the most pressure then maybe but like i said in all the other comments compare it to a hi point .45 acp which the whole slide is junk metal but is just made thicker and heavier to be able to take the pressure and is a blowback design vs this gun which is real steel
    2
  168. wow just wow -_-
    2
  169. The Ride Never ends if you go by the unconstitional "laws" then no if you go by reality it is
    2
  170. Kyle Hall and unconstitutional therefore null and void but the only reason we all go by the so called "laws" is cause no one will fight for fear of death or jail time if we did like we shpuld thered be no problem with this crap
    2
  171. Matt Johnson if you go by that unconstitional herefore null and void determination then yeah if you go by reality no
    2
  172. kenns9 actually it would be even with that but people are brainwashed into believing that load of horse crap that they preach
    2
  173. Arman Hatamkhani its not under any circumstances regaurdless of what the corrupt government says
    2
  174. CAROLINA PATRIOT theyre not smoking anything theyre just brainwashed cause theyre stupid so they just take what "the "experts"" say and tell them to do
    2
  175. Jamal Labarge they dont actually care anout whats best for people and its not hard to see theres so many government set up hoaxes its not funny and theyre all used as excuses to make stupid people get on their side about it
    2
  176. Max Kronader its still part of america its hust way worse than anywhere else in it and no one foghts for the rights they should have anywhere cause if we did we wouldnt be dealing with this kinda crap right now
    2
  177. Robert Benson downloading means you dont put as much powder in the ammo usually for people who load their own ammo
    2
  178. Not Pulverman better than killing good innocent people
    2
  179. loud American youre actually allowed to have any weapon you please without anything the government says you need for it to be legal cause of the second amendment but we havent been using it as intended and have just been giving in to the so called “laws”
    2
  180. Michael McDermott imagine not understanding what it says and why it says that like it does like you dont apparently theres a lot better reason for it being written the way it was than what youre wanting to change it for thats for darn sure just look at history man all the people wanting gun control ended up getting slaughtered by the millions by their own government cause they wouldnt fight that tyranny nazi germany with the holocaust and a ton of communist countries like russia and china
    2
  181.  @alexandercarr5948  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    2
  182.  @derekbowbrick6233  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    2
  183.  @bamboozlednoodle6513  wow no idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑 ill use whatever freakin emojis i want and its more cute you think saying cute like that makes you cool or whatever its just showing emotions through text cause its hard to otherwise
    2
  184.  @curious-relics  pretty much anyone can steal almost any investment you know
    2
  185.  @echodelta2172  they overprice all of em anymore and its cause of the very real fear of the very real theat that they'll be "banned" and i say that in qoutes cause they can't be in reality cause of the second amendment but because people don't use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically it will be "banned" eventually
    2
  186. Alessio M no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  187. completely wrong determinations their definition for a machine gun is any gun that shoots more than one bullet per trigger pull so if a revolver shot two at once thatd be a machine gun in their definition its all lies to get people on their side about banning them cause their audience or people voting for them are people dont know anything about firearms or are scared of them already
    2
  188. Jack Stecker bad times* i know youre probly being sarcastic but some people really are stupid enough to not know tou are
    2
  189. Michael Mercier if you dont fight it physically like you should as intended in the second amendment*
    2
  190. Michael Jackson thats just it though its not really illegal anywhere in the united states unless youre committing an actual crime with it not just owning or using it in a way that isnt bad no matter what they say is "legal" or not its not true
    2
  191. Gavin Hudson it is for certain things and if you dont make very much money extra to spend on things you dont neccesarily need to live on like food and water and shelter
    2
  192. SnakebitSTI "modern safety satndards" are irrelevant here theres so many things that are considered "unsafe" by the pussies that are "in charge" of us everything can be dangerous if used a certain way even literally air if you compress it then use an airgun its just like an explosion cause thats all an explosion is force
    2
  193. Josh Cruise put extra sights on a rail 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  194.  @charlessmith6412  also there's no such thing as an "assault weapon" cause any weapon can be used to assault someone its a made up word to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons
    2
  195.  @bensmith4563  depending if you're being safe with it or not the safety on a gun is between your ears not on the gun itself cause what if you forget to put it on or it breaks and doesn't work anymore?
    2
  196. "ma" would be better cause people call it the ma deuce
    2
  197. MrRagequitnow people cat tell sarcasm through texts theyd think youre serious its not even funny at this point its scary
    2
  198. Soylent Green be a free state and buy it anyway cause you know theres a thing called the constitution the "laws" arent even laws cause the constitution basically says theyre not and never can be
    2
  199. DoctorWeeTodd wverythimg is actually legal everywhere in the united states but thugs run the place so they lie and make people believe it is and theres a harsh punishment if they dont follow those "laws" in otherwords if its unconstitutional its not a law the constitution specifically says it isnt cause thats what the constitution does limits governments power
    2
  200. any gun law that restricts what we can own or how isnt even truly a law if you believe fully in the second amendment that says a well regulated (well trained not the retarded way the lefties think of it) militia being neccesary to the security of a free staye the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. not it shall only be infringed if the lefties think somethings too powerful or for any other reason
    2
  201. Jonas Strzyz anything restricting the use/ownership like a license which you have to have permission from the government to own which the constitution says you cant do is a big limitation and the crazy price because they restricted making any new weapons that were full auto after 1986 unless you are a post sample dealer/manufacturer which you have to have a license that costs 500 dollars a year i think to keep
    2
  202. SgtKOnyx thats what ian said its a runaway machine gun not a trigger machinegun like today where you can control the firing once you start with the trigger and stop it from shooting all your ammo or nothing
    2
  203. robert feeley youre crazy
    2
  204. Nunya Biz thats not even funny or smart as a joke
    2
  205. Hunter Drone47 26 youre a complete idiot to even joke about that
    2
  206. Brittany Mullins its not all their fault they only have the power we give them if we fought back back in the day when they first started trying to make these lies they call "laws" we wouldnt be worrying about this crap right now
    2
  207. Rory lol funny that you gotta ask permission from the government we literally have it written in our framework that theyre not supposed to be able to tell you what you can and cant own in any way the only reason we go by them is cause we got people in office who believe they can make these infringements they call "laws" cause they got paid goons to enforce them and the people believe they have to go by them and are too afraid to fight back its not cause theyre real "laws"
    2
  208. RUFIORUFIO government criminal issues yeah
    2
  209.  @charlesangell_bulmtl  i know that thats the whole point of the second amendment to keep them in check physically if needed like we do now and should have been for a long time now with whatever weapons we please without anything they say you need for it to be legal cause tyrants dont care about us or our freedoms or our rights etc unless made to by force
    2
  210.  @Iyamdisgustipated  not just "a trained person with a ccw" will stop that plenty of people would be willing without a "ccw "license"" but no the people in charge have to get their money and have their complete control over us and we just let it happen cause we're either too scared or brainwashed to fight back like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place they know good and well what theyre doing is bad they just dont care because like i said they just want to make their living and control everything everyone does and they cant do that if everyones armed and willing to use all the weapons we should have because of the second amendment so they threaten death or jailtime to make us comply and they get their way because we just cave and do it instead of fighting physically like we should so its more our fault for letting it happen than it is theres for "making the "laws""
    2
  211.  @Strawberry92fs  it is a witch hunt cause if they can just call anyone crazy and have the police take your guns/weapons and take away your right to own them again then everyone will just start doing that then no one will have guns/weapons but the bad guys or the good guys that go by the actual laws cause the bad guys they definately wont give them up and the good people that know theyre innocent definately wont give them up without a fight also they dont even really care if someone says theyre crazy their end goal is total disarmament so they can control everythig everyone does without any resistance and kill millions of innocents just like what happened in nazi germany and in communist countries like russia and china and alot of other communist countries
    2
  212.  @erikcrouch7881  all they do is abuse their power and they pander to stupid people who cant see that its not a gun/weapon availability problem its a mental health problem with the person behind the gun thats killing people for no good reason the people "in charge" know exactly what theyre doing and their end goal is total disarmament so they can control everything everyone does without any resistance and can kill millions just like in nazi germany or alot of communist countries have before i used to wonder why we learn history but now i know why its so we dont repeat the bad parts of it if we listen to it and do what we should to fight it from happening again kinda why the second amendment exists in the first place to fight bad governement with whatever weapons we please but it only works if we actually use it as intended to do that cause tyrants dont care about their limits of power unless forced to
    2
  213.  @BuggaBoy69  they cant make anyone look like fools but to other fools that know no better its exactly what the government does they pander to stupid people who know no better so theyll just believe it "cause they said so" as facts unfiltered
    2
  214.  @ozymandias9549  it actually brings alot more death and unsafety just look at history with all the countries that had communism and had "gun/weapon control" it starts with registration then confiscation (of those who registered them not actual bad guys or people who didnt and bought privately or stole them or made their own) then when all the people who gave up their guns gave them up they killed them by the millions and thats whats going to happen here if we keep caving and going by their so called "laws" they keep "passing" that if we go by them take more and more of our rights slowly until we have none left and nothing left to fight back physically to get them back with
    2
  215.  @Iyamdisgustipated  i see i was just pointing out the corruptness and pointlessness of having to have licenses cause that doesnt guarantee that that person wont do bad things with the gun/weapon or wont forget all that training etc it just means that the government knows who carries so they can take your stuff away (if you get a license to carry and register your guns etc that they say you "have to do for it to be "legal"")
    2
  216.  @Iyamdisgustipated  its cause they know thats the "flaw" the "legal" gun/weapon owners or good people that wont go by the fake "laws" are the ones they want them taken from though cause they themselves are the bad guys thats why they dont actually care about the bad guys having them and want the good people that will fight their tyranny disarmed and the people going by their fake "laws" will be the ones that are disarmed because theyre going by them only cause of fear or brainwashing the good people that will fight their fake "laws" theyll call criminals and will make them look bad they brainwash "criminal" and "bad guy" to be synonmous with each other when thats just not true when they "pass" fake "laws" so people say "well if youre breaking "laws" then youre a bad guy and deserve what you get for going against them"
    2
  217. if you put a bumpfire stock on it then you could probly make it go pretty fast
    2
  218. no such thing as an "assault rifle" theres something even better than this and came before it it was a flint lock machinegun basically
    2
  219. Grey Bayles politicians never knew how terrible war is they never fought in it they just ordered men into battle
    2
  220. Larrymcjones thatd be awesome i think cause i love guns of any kind
    2
  221. Obese Taco uhh ok?
    2
  222. Obese Taco ah... i changed it
    2
  223. CambodianForged InFreedom2AIII%ER the ultimate would be showing them having all the freedom we should have and not going by all the unconstitutional "laws" they "pass" cause the second amendment says "shall not be infringed." period. no ifs ands or buts or anything else to allow that to be changed for any reason
    2
  224. you really dont know how much a 1911 weighs if you think two of them weigh 10 pounds not even a desert eagle .50 ae weighs 5 pounds maybe when its loaded but unloaded it weighs under 5 for sure
    2
  225.  @undrgrnd734  no just no
    2
  226. Big Blue thats the same with any gun (not that you cant stop it once it starts but need to be pointing it in the right way when fired)
    2
  227. WalkaCrookedLine they shouldntve came into a war where they were fighting people with these things but he said they werent used anyway
    2
  228. William Wallace make it be able to shoot buckshot slug and birdshot and basically anything a normal shotgun could shoot and dont always use it like a full auto and their are alot or practical uses for a beltfed shotgun in full or semiauto
    2
  229. silverbladeTE cool especially if it is real ill have to look it up i would love to have something like that
    2
  230. thats not an anti safety thats just how it functions cause its a flintlock with multiple charges of ammo
    2
  231. Thom they more than likely had muskets that shot once though and then you had to reload and this is a machine gun theyd probly all be dead before they got two shots off a piece
    2
  232. Ward Vermassen that a good murica or a bad one?
    2
  233. snipeefox no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  234. Jeremy Backman because theyre not good at all theyre just paid goons the government is just a mafia anymore
    2
  235. Judged we should be fighting this crap physically as the second amendment intends and shouldve been for years before this even became a thing to worry about with fake "laws"
    2
  236. Judged we should be fighting this crap physically as the second amendment intends and shouldve been for years before this even became a thing to worry about with fake "laws"
    2
  237. KantraScepter dude no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  238. Charles Gibbs cause we havent fought it physically as the second amendment intends its more our fault than the commies
    2
  239. Jordan you have no idea what hes done if you think that
    2
  240. Dementis Vir woww 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  241. Jeremy Backman there is no hope of the government being good anymore its spread like a disease that cant be stopped cause we havent been fighting it physically for years (the whole point of the second amendment)
    2
  242. J B well theyre liars cause any weapon/weapon part or ammo for those weapons is legal cause of the second amendment look at it this way they cant "ban" any parts/ammo cause if you did theres no point in having the weapons cause then you cant fire them thats the same thing for the parts just cause it functions a certain way doesnt mean they can make it illegal we just got people that are brainwashed or too scared to fight it like we should so no ine will band together to fight it
    2
  243.  @jamallabarge2665  i dont know if he was good or not i was just pointing him out because he made a functional smg from nothing but hardward store parts and no actual already made for guns parts
    2
  244.  @jamallabarge2665  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    2
  245. Bubba teach them what to do and what not to do dont just call them idiots for not knowing or being new to it 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  246. thats what a proof test is ya know they just took it to extreme levels
    2
  247.  @ihs200  no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  248.  W R Sporing  no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    2
  249. "draws the 45-70 bfr" thats a gun**
    2
  250. Gavin Mclean if you go by those so called "laws" yeah if not you fight like you should against tyranny
    2
  251. strider04 dude do you even know what a break action gun is? is so simple people with pretty much no knowledge of how guns work can figure out how to build one it doesnt take any skills whatsoever cause skills are learned first you dont just automatically know how to do something like youre acting like you or anyone esle that knows how to do stuff does and you proved my point to get to the point they had training or whatever but not all people do go through training they figure out what works and what doesnt already having experience doesnt make sense cause you had to do something (testing what works or not or being taught) to get there in the first place you dont just start out with the experience
    2
  252. strider04 i know what youre saying but its crap to be honest cause the guns werent near as complicated as todays guns and more people were more knowledgable than today (not like knowing or making todays tech but i mean they learned better and faster etc cause nowadays people dont rely on their own brains for their information they rely on computers and stuff to even memorise things for them
    2
  253. strider04 i didnt say they had them back then and they are pretty darn simple to build all you have is a tigger and hammer and the springs that go with it a housing and the barrel and forearm and stock and firing pin and a spring for that
    2
  254. strider04 youre not getting what im saying
    2
  255. strider04 yeah thats as your building the gun and you dont need rifling or even a sight i was just talking about building one and it not blowing up part thats what the testing does even newer production guns from professional gun makers have to be pressure and safety tested idiot they dont just say "oh well from what we know about how to produce them we'll just not test it and send it out to people and hope for the best" and i didnt "just edit it to make you look stupid" youre doing that on your own bud i edited it cause i missed something i was gonna say you must be a mind reader if you think you know i was thinking to edit it to make you look stupid also you said "can fire out of battery" im sure you meant cant fire out of battery* but still
    2
  256. strider04 i accept your apology i really dont mean any harm just trying to have a conversation also sorry for the names 👍
    2
  257. Shehryar Khan pretty sure the government in egypt doesnt like christians
    2
  258. Oni Tora there are peaceful muslims that dont believe in doing that though and just want to worship the way they want i hate when people say all religion is bad cause of the few or even alot that use it just to justify the evil that they do that actually isnt for good reason like self defense from a robber or rapist or killer etc like that
    2
  259. Oni Tora like i said before there are people who are muslim that dont go by that part though i dont know how many but you cant stereotype people just cause their religion says that they should do that theres so many people who only pick and choose what they want to follow in all religions and even non religious people use bullcrap reasons to "justify" their actions that are evil and then there are people who dont do the bad things so they dont have to "justify" anything the point is dont judge all by what a few or a majority do each individual should only be held accountable for what they do themselves not what others with their same religion do
    2
  260.  @GogglesAreAwsome  no
    2
  261. A-Cell well americans have the same issue probly as them that the intermediate small cartridges dont have enough punch when they get to the target so they upped the caliber i think we only went up to 6. something mm though not full blown .50 caliber
    2
  262. RealArtUplifts who cares if it says defend or not i know the people enforce what they call "laws" dont
    2
  263.  @kevinsullivan3448  wow no just no🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    2
  264.  @Nathan-zw7nq  you mean we should use the second amendment as intended to fight back physically cause you cant repeal something that doesnt exist in the first place cause of the second amendment and tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
    2
  265.  @vilecreature8640  no they have it for "regular" guns too thats what you fill out every time you buy from a "legal" gunstore or any other place that sells them "legally" and i say that in woutes cause its not a real law cause of the second amendment
    2
  266.  @TheFanatical1  wow no its not a stock theres an actual difference in a stock and a brace but youre the type that is stupid enough to believe theyre the same thing that they speead that misinformation to and that gives them their votes and supports them no matter what they say or do cause you dont want to man up and figt back against tyrabby physically like the second amendment intends
    2
  267. Hipster Crab laws have nothing to do with how good or bad people are or what theyll do with rhe guns/weapond they have only if theyre good people will they use them in a good way or not no laws will cause bad people dont care about those laws and will do bad things anyway and will get them anyway
    2
  268. SKSaddrakk doubt it america makes good guns/weapons and people know it too but the people of our military still go to war
    2
  269. DrGraypFroot thats not a militia if you have to do all that stuff to be in one a militia is just normal people not like a formal army or are trained like a formal army etc thats the very defintion of a militia not a formal army (like funded and trained by the government of a country or state etc and all that stuff)
    2
  270. Phos9 no it still makes sense to cause of what you just said it probly wouldnt even work or if it did itd be poorly
    2
  271. duachim its not "paying for the history" its because people go by the so called "laws" that make them less available cause they cant be remanufactured by "civilians" without a license that way
    2
  272. Derrick Flyr just dont go by the "laws" that are unconstitutional cause they arent actually laws read up on the constitution and second amendment and understand what it says and means and why it was written how it was and fight for your rights
    2
  273. Austin Powers if you go by unconstitutional "laws" then yes in reality no
    1
  274. hoosierarcher in reality you actually can carry them cause of the second amendnent
    1
  275. Queen Emily its a close quarters weapon doesnt need a barrel
    1
  276. hoosierarcher in reality its not illegal anywhere in the U.S. cause of the second amendment
    1
  277. Rob uhh what? you know lefties dont like guns/weapons for the common people right?
    1
  278. Rob itd be any left wing state if they could actually do that making any weapon "illegal" to own or use which they cant cause of the second amendment
    1
  279. Owen Hughes shoulda physically fought for your rights regaurdless if you have the second amendment or not tyranny shouldnt be tolerated anywhere
    1
  280. Chon Connor a regular revolver doesnt have brass knuckles and a knife
    1
  281. MR.videogames nowhere to be exact in the U.S. cause of the second amendment actually but we have too many people brainwashed or too scared to physically fight like we should against the bullcrap "laws"
    1
  282. STM thats the only way dictators will be made to care thats why we have a whole amendment that we're allowed to have whatever weapons we please and to use them when they abuse their power but we havent been doing that for way too long now we're pretty much down to nothing for what the "common man" can afford to actually have and all the good stuff you "need" way too much to be cosidered "legal" if you go by what the government says would be "legal" instead of what actually is legal which is all weapons cause of the second amendment thats worded "arms" (which just means weapons not certain ones or with certain attachments or that shoot certain ammo etc that they regulate or that they say you have to have to be "legal" like taxes or licenses to sell or buy etc)
    1
  283.  Rich Wats  it is federally allowed in reality cause of the second amendment but if we dont fight physically as intended then its pointless to have the second amendment at all cause thats the whole point of it
    1
  284.  @MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive  no "laws" "banning" any weapon in any way is a real law cause of the second amendment in reality only if they commit an actual crime to obtain it like stealing it or if they use it for a real crime like murder or raping pr robbing etc doe does it actually becone a legal issue despite what corrupt politicians/police will enforce or tell you or put tou in jail for "(if you dont fight against it physically like you should i mean)
    1
  285.  @daltongarrett7117  you know why it hasnt stopped? its not cause of any of the people "in charge" its cause we dont use the second amendment to fight as we should against those so called "laws" thats the only way its going to stop not cause of any certain person "in charge" of us thats the whole reason the second amendment was written cause without restraints the government does whatever they please to us and we havent been using the second amendment as intended to fight back physically to make them care about their limits of power
    1
  286.  @daltongarrett7117  it does affect gunowners cause it affects weapons in general if they "ban" any weapon for any reason and that shouldnt "ruin" it for everyone and actually isnt the real reason they "banned" them the real reason is they want everyone totally disarmed so they can control everything everyone does without any resistance and people who are actually pro second amendment do care its just not enough people that care enough to actually physically fight for their rights like the whole reason the second amendment was there for in the first place it only works if we use it as intended though if not tyrants wont be made to care about us or our rights etc only their power over us and their own wellbeing
    1
  287.  @daltongarrett7117  thats because they usually wont fire unless cocked and then the trigger being pulled or dropped hard enough on the hammer to make it fire its like a built in safety in that type of firearm
    1
  288.  @daltongarrett7117  also thats why some people carry on an empy chamber a manual safety or hammerblock safety etc like that is just redundant and most people that want safeties on guns would forget they had them and so forget to turn them on or off when using them so its kinda just more to worry about and is actually worse in a stressful situation like having to defend yourself with them or use them in combat so its just more liability and trouble than its worth to have a safety on them or any gun for that matter as i like to say safety is in the mind of the shooter not on the gun
    1
  289. David Aitchison you have to remember to do that each time
    1
  290. im surprised we dont have lightsabers on the end of our guns already
    1
  291. Manu K. im just surprised we dont have lightsaber bayonets yet
    1
  292. John Sanders you know we have plasma cutters right?
    1
  293. Historical Archery melee weapons will never be obsolete im surprised we dont already have lightsabers as part of the equipment in the more advanced countries lol
    1
  294. John Sanders (sarcasm) yeah cause youd definately know what theyd be using it for and when theyd use it 😂🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  295. John Sanders lol ok bud you arent even worth arguing with😂
    1
  296. John Sanders lol k bye 😂👍
    1
  297. phantomspaceman any gun is just a blunt weapon without ammo unless you have a bayonet then its a sharp weapon and a blunt one depending on which end you use
    1
  298. RoBOtic Rebel uhh no its not idiot not all guns have a dust cover
    1
  299. A Bit Of A Pickel someones probly tried it ive seen some crazy things just try looking it up
    1
  300.  @ohlordy2042  just threatening with a gun doesnt always work though what if theyre on drugs or have a high adrenaline rush you never know what could happen id rather have something i know will stop them if i actually had to fire it at them to stop them rather than hoping itll stop them without havivg to shoot them and just showing it
    1
  301. Daniel its been old since vietnam its really only good against maybe some pistols if you mean flak jackets
    1
  302. Norian Arijuna if by aramids you mean like kevlar type fabrics used in soft body armor they definately wont stop an ak or similar type rounds theyre mainly for pistol calibers only and not small fast pistol calibers at that even an intermediate rifle round will pass right through unless you layer it so thick itd be too heavy to wear by military standards cause they have so much other gear to carry like ammo and med kits and hydration and rations etc that they carry
    1
  303. Vincent Falcone the thing about armor though is theres always some way of defeating it and always people looking for new ways to defeat said "best body armor" of the time and i can for sure say without a doubt that there wont ever be a full body suit that can shrug off everything you throw at it without the wearer being taken out of the fight indefinately
    1
  304. curtis brown the full body plate armor could be defeated with arrows either shot from a certain weight bow or cause they had spear heads made from a certain metal or a combination of both cause it was either a softer steel or not heat treated the way we can now
    1
  305. weird science even so it wont stop rifle rounds of any kind unless stacked so thick you couldnt wear it for the weight they said their bulletproof shirt is like 4 pounds and is still only rated the same as kevlar hard body armor will always win out cause it dumps all of it energy when it hits unless they come out with man portable forcefields that are actually affordable and sustainable then the hard armor is the best youll get unless youre in a tank nowadays they have stuff that make rpgs etc obsolete cause they detonate them before they hit the tank now all they need is something to melt bullets before it hits the soldier
    1
  306. Norian Arijuna it was more than likely from a long distance so the round lost power and was at an angle that a made it no able penetrate if you get a straight on shot at a close enogh range kevlar does no good against any rifle or pistol that has decent velocity and is small like you said and steel isnt that bad for armor ive see ar-500 steel stop .338 lapua bullets with just one plate i think and not even that thick of a plate either
    1
  307. Norian Arijuna whats a Pitman?
    1
  308.  @812558  they literally sell .22lrs that are kinda like this gun in the way it shoots and is only one shot like this i think its call a gbb-22 which is short for gun buyback-22 because its basically a junk or plinker type 22lr single shot pistol even though i wouldnt even turn that in to be honest they dont deserve any gun to be turned in/"bought back" theyll just destroy it and we dont need any guns destroyed
    1
  309. NOT chilli booboo i hope thats a joke cause if not thats retarded and actually even if it is its still retarded cause they had way better weapons i just saw another forgotten weapons video that the gun he was showing and telling about was literally a flintlock machinegun
    1
  310. Hamstray wouldnt take that much i mean its just like a cannon only it has different chambers that rotate
    1
  311. @jujitsuman68 yeah whatever you say idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  312.  @BananaPhoPhilly  theres also flintlock machineguns that look like miniguns that shoot about 230 rounds a minute or something like that
    1
  313.  @bruhbruh-us6gl  all weapons are the second amendment says "arms" (which means weapons and not just certain ones or with certain attachments etc that are weapon related like ammo) and "shall not be infringed." (infringed means limited) if they meant only certain ones or whatever they wouldve said something to say that not just "arms" and "shall not be infringed."
    1
  314. stranger things have happened
    1
  315. also atf completely bullcrap determination: "guns arent guns if theyre blackpowder only and cant readily be converted to shoot smokeless powder"
    1
  316. TheNinjaDC they dont actually care whats more dangerous for the people shooting them theyre concerned about themselves cause people having machineguns are harder to control/fight against which is the whole reason we have the second amendment
    1
  317. ahayesm the atf is a group of idiots that think they can tell you what and how you can and cant own guns/weapons "legally" when the second amendment literally says theyre not allowed to
    1
  318. SAM BRICKELL you mean they dont want people having it cause its harder to control people who are armed with everything they should be able to own which is literally any weapon we please without any restiriction and its even written in our constitution which is the guidlelines for how we make laws here and the second amendment where it says the right of the people to KEEP AND BEAR "ARMS" (weapons not specified weapons or just firearms and isnt short for firearms) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (limited) period no ifs ands or buts to change its meaning
    1
  319. Gravyon if you do it "legally" you have to have a license to own/make new production machineguns if its after may 6th 1986 according to the feds when its not even real "laws" cause of the second amendment which doesnt allow for any limitations in any way
    1
  320. Michaela Bedonie and if its made after may 6th 1986 you have to have a license to own/produce it and a tax stamp to do it "legally" according to the feds and the license is like 500 dollars a year or something like that
    1
  321. l337pwnage not really they can and will get away with banning them all they just have been doing it slowly and will get away with it as long as we let them keep enforcing unconstitutional "laws"
    1
  322. Jon Smith 50 bmg could go through about three people or more with one round yeah the glock would have more ammo but would be way less accurate and not penetrate one person but all of this doesnt even matter cause a criminal willing to kill that many people is obviously going to use whatever they please and get it in any way they please the way some people argue we shouldnt have these things makes it seem like they think criminals will follow any "law" they "pass" that only restricts the peoples rights who will go by those so called "laws"
    1
  323. I’m crying in a corner While i count my money in the feds eyes and people who believe what they say not the actual law the second amendment expressly states it isnt illegal and never will be
    1
  324. Nunya Bidness but imagine if the feds allowed us to have it to shoot back with if its supposedly more dangerous in their eyes itd be more dangerous for the would be mass shooter too so that logic doesnt really work in their favor to argue with and actually no logic they try to argue with helps them for the simple fact of the second amendment that says (and im paraphrasing but) the right of the people to keep and bear "arms" (weapons bot just certain kinds) shall not be infringed. (limited) period no ifs ands or buts about it and also in almost every amendment if not every amendment it says the powers not given here in this document are reserved to the states or to the people so the feds actually arent allowed to regulate our weapons in any way what we can and cant own or how we can and cant own them etc
    1
  325. shadowrundas pees? and why would they try to shoot themselves with a full auto glock? that makes no sense people who are suicidal will usually use whatever is around to kill themselves not just look for a certain thing or if they cant find it just say "oh well guess i wont kill myself" just like people who are willing to be mass shooters or mass killers arent gonna go by the "laws" and say "oh well cant legally buy a gun or bombs or whatever theyd kill the people with guess ill just go back home"
    1
  326. CMDR Turtle they should just leave you alone anyway they only have the power we allow them to have to be honest the second amendment only works like it supposed to if the people keep them in check like we're supposed to it says the right of the people not the right of the government to keep and bear arms (weapons and bot certain weapons thats why its worded that way) shall not be infringed (limited) period no is ands or buts about it) and use them to enslave us cause we dont have any weapons if we keep them in check it works if we dont then its just words on a piece of paper written a long time ago
    1
  327. unfa its not about concelaing it or how fast it can shoot even to them its all about control over the people think if we had that to defend ourselves with the damge and surprise factor logic doesnt make sense if the people have that much power or more to fight back with and do you think a mass shooter really cares about concealing it or surprising them when they think theyre unarmed? that makes no sense either they dont care who sees them if theyre hust gonna be killing everyone in sight that they can also there was a mass shooting on a college campus with a bolt action rifle and he was doing it sniper style from a bell tower so i dont think it really matters about concealability or sneak attacks that much or how fast the gun can fire etc all the atf/governmebts logic is bullcrap deceptions they dont consider black powder only and not convertable to smokeless power guns to be firearms(guns) lol 😂 so theyre basically saying "guns arent guns if theyre black powder only" how stupid does that sound to you?
    1
  328. super viggo bros you know what else the atf considers a machinegun? anything that fires more than one shot with one pull of the trigger thatd make a double barrel a machinegun if it shot both barrels at once theyre decieving people into believing things are somethingn they arent so they can ban it so they keep redefining it so they can ban more and more
    1
  329. No Body no crap people are (stupidly) arguing that the full auto glock is more dangerous cause its more concealable and is full auto so it can cause more damage faster than a semiauto when a barrett could probly go through three or more people with one shot and you could be two miles away and hot someone with it tell me how the glock would be more concealable when you couldnt even shoot someone near that far away with it or near that accurately lol 😂
    1
  330. Karvast not only that a .50 bmg is also concealable in the fact you could shoot someone from 2 miles away and itd still be able to go through about three or more people and a glock youd have to be right in the group of people youd want to shoot yes it may be full auto and you can spray and pray but think about if we had the same weapon or even more to defend ourselves with (the full auto glock) if theyre that close we could use that same weapon against them and itd be just as dangerous for the would be mass shooter as it was for us and rhey go for places that they think will be unarmed imagine if their "laws" said it required everyone to be armed theyd either think twice or get wrecked after the first shot they fired or if they were seen before they could shoot cause theyd be filled full of holes feom everyone there
    1
  331. Nicolas Preciado i hope youre being sarcastic but even so thats not something to joke about these idiots dont know crap that want to legislate something they expressly arent allowed to
    1
  332. Anzac-A1 its not unconcealable at all you could hust shoot them from about two miles away with a .50 bmg id like to see you do that with a full auto glock lol and the .50 bmg would still go through about three people with one shot glocks cant do that even at close range yeah if youre close up it can do alot of damage to alot of people reallt fast but if the people had that same or more firepower like we should theyd get wrecked before they could get a second shot off cause so many people would be armed and would be able to actually do something about it instead of not being able to do anything at all but run and hope to not die or get shot they choose places they think are safest so they can kill the most people like places that have "gun free zone" signs thats just an invitation for people that are crazy to go shoot the place up theyre easy targets and not threats to them cause they arent able to shoot back
    1
  333. skinnypimp riminals dont beed a license either they just buy it off the black market for a little cash and walk away with it they dont care about the stupid license or anything they say you need (even good civilians dont need it but they wont fight the unconstitutional government so we still go by them for fear of jailtime or death)
    1
  334. Dank memes i hope you dont mean like in a videogame and a barrett not being concealable is bullcrap too you can be like two miles away and kill someone with it and its still go through like theee people with one shot the full auto glock cant do that im sure
    1
  335. Dank memes or weapon that we please with no restrictions cause of the second amendment
    1
  336. I’m crying in a corner While i count my money uhh the mod? what're you talking about?
    1
  337. TGG yeah no the barrett not being concealable is a load of crap you could shppt someone about 2 miles away and itd probly still go through three or more people with a full auto glock youd have to be right up on people yeah it may be full auto but imagine if every responsible adult was was armed with that same firepower or more the shooter wouldnt even go there nore yhan likely cause of all the possible resistance to him with a barrett they wouldnt be able to fire back on him cause hed be so far away they wouldnt be able to find him
    1
  338. TheNinjaDC youre a complete idiot the people who argue for wanting to be able to have these things are way more careful and dont do that stupid crap like that
    1
  339. Gravyon criminals dont care about what they say you need though so doesnt make it any harder to get to them and a barrett is more concealable if you think aboit its capability to be able to kill someone at 2 miles then still probly go through three more people even at that range
    1
  340. Carter Swinton do you know you can kill someone from two miles away with a barrett and itd still have the energy to go through about three more people? and they wouldnt be able to find you for being so far away and you wouldnt have to worry about shooting fast or reloading fast for that fact or have a big magazineor concealing it or any of that nonsense and there was mass shooting with a bolt action rifle from a bell tower at a college campus sniper style so none of that makes any sense to try to argue against the second amendment and another thing that really doesnt make sense is if we had the same firepower as that person itd be just as dangerous to the shooter as it is for the people hed be trying to shoot why do you think most if not all shooting happen in places that have signs that say "no weapons allowed" or "gun free zone" its because thats where theu think there wont be any resistance so they can kill as many people as possible
    1
  341. SpyerSecol 001 doesnt really matter hpw many mass shootings any gun has been used for or any reason they can act like they can come up with to ban it they arent allowef to ban anything for is to own for any reason the only reason we go by their so called "laws" is cause we're too afraid to fight back or dont want to go to jail or die for not doing what they say
    1
  342. MARSHALL Amp probibited in the minds of the atf/federal government or any government that believes they are and in the minds of those who believe what those governments say* the second amendment expressly states they arent allowed to ban/restrict them for ownership in any way for any reason
    1
  343. Scott Keegan a glock 18 cant kill 3 or maybe more people with one shot from two miles away concealablity doesnt mean crap once you open up with a full auto glock with a barrett you wouldnt be seen at all and wouldnt have to worr about having a big magazine or having to shoot fast or concealing it or any of the other bullcrap they day makes it "more dangerous" than a barrett
    1
  344. Wild Bill the "bans" etc that "restrict" civilian sales are complete and udder bullcrap and are null and void the only reason anyone goes by them is for fear of jailtime or death and dont want to fight for the second amendment if we fought back in the days where we still could buy military grade hardware from a hardware store without a background check we wouldnt be in the mess we're in right now and we actually shouldnt be anyway cause the second amendment expressly states they arent allowed to ban/regulate in anyway for any reason any type of weapon
    1
  345. Gibbelblonk obviously you dont know what that "big rifle" is capable of you could shoot someone from 2 miles away and still go through about three or more people after that and youd pretty much be invincible cause they wouldnt be able to find you a grenade blows up once and you have to be so close youd get wrecked after the first one is thrown if every responsible adult was armed with the same or better weapons that they have
    1
  346. Jon Smith one bullet of a barret is more dangerous cause you can fire it from 2 miles away and go through probly three or more people with that one bullet even at that range
    1
  347. Jon Smith i always laugh when i hear people talking about how easy or expensive something is to get for "regular" ""law" abiding""people yeah it is hard and expensive but for a criminal whos willing to kill people they can steal it or make one themselves or buy it from other people who dont care about the "laws" and only care about the money in their pockets they get from selling it to said person
    1
  348. Jon Smith the death of our second amendment rights is cause we dont physically fight the people who enforce unconstitutional "laws" for fear of death or jailtime
    1
  349. Kingrhem school shooters dont buy their guns they steal them cause they dont care about the "laws" they "pass"
    1
  350. Dylan Cook thats what they want you to believe just like how they want you to believe that all the so called "laws" that they "pass" have to be followed when the constitution literally says they are unlawful laws
    1
  351.  @sntslilhlpr6601  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  352.  @northernu.s.a3995  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  353.  @TheFirstCurse1  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  354. Dad obviously meant to be by them even though its not funny
    1
  355. SovietPotato riiightt no just no
    1
  356. Tristan Perciful no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  357. Bartek B no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  358. cosa que existe you could have if you didnt go by the corrupt government like you should
    1
  359. Vsucc no its still suckering them cause only people who think like that would buy something like that and pay that price for it when you could literally make your own yeah it wouldnt be real but like i said only the people whod buy it cause they think that way would pay that for it for that reason
    1
  360. Marginally Sapient Cactus the one thing that makes that completely wrong is that the magazine is in the grip of the uzi this one is in front of the pistol grip and a few other cosmetic differences
    1
  361. BackwardsPancake no game is ever gonna be completely accurate to history
    1
  362. "illegal" tyrannical "laws" arent real laws whats happening now is what was happening in nazi germany in ww2 when all the innocent jewish people got killed it goes registration , total disarmament, mass murder learn from history so you dont repeat the bad things shouldnt give up any of your weapons ever
    1
  363.  @Hawky610  pretty much all the worlds governments are pretty well useless anymore if not all of them theyre all becoming the same type of government tyrannical and only want control over everything everyone does thats why they all want to "ban" all guns/weapons so we cant fight back physically just like all the other times like nazi germany or the communist countries like russia and china and japan etc that disarmed millions and killed millions of innocents cause they couldnt fight back at that point i used to wonder why we learn about history but now i know its so we dont repeat the bad parts of it in the future
    1
  364.  @colec.6477  you mean in all of the U.S.* in reality cause the second amendment/constitution is for all of america not just certain states that want to allow it
    1
  365. i do too you can make one from stuff you can buy at a hardware store lol
    1
  366. FearTheGremlin arming up and used to be arming their civilians with military grade equipment like we should be here in america instead of disarming the good people instead of making "laws" that the criminals only take advantage of
    1
  367. Hughes Enterprises youre one of the people that think those so called "laws" actually have to be followed so you wont even be able to buy that stuff soon enough just be a real american and make your own stuff and dont tell anyone let it be a surprise when they come for you and dont expect you to have those type weapons cause they didnt know cause its not registered and they didnt know you built them
    1
  368. Hughes Enterprises neither are and you can say what you want about "making myself a target" all you want but i really dont care cause its not actually illegal read and understand what the second amendment says and means then we can have a conversation otherwise dont bring up stupid stuff like that
    1
  369. Hughes Enterprises i never said to convince them or that they would be convinced and its not "our interpretation" thats literally what it says and we need to hold everyone in the government accountable for actually going by it which is the whole reason its there because tyrants dont care what it says and the only way to make them care is show them we mean business by taking out those who enforce these so called "laws" they "pass"
    1
  370. DreamingFlurry the whole point of constitutions is to lay out what the government cab and cant do the only time it becomes not useful pr effective is when the people let it happen to take away your rights imagine what its be like today if we all didnt comply with anything thats unconstitutional we wouldnt have any unconstitutional laws cause even if they brought in the full military with all their weapons wed have the same ones cause we didnt give them them an inch for them to take a mile
    1
  371. Alberto Jimenez and against the government that would try to stop you from it
    1
  372. Lucky Ted only cause the people who fully believe in how the constitution arent comingg together and fighting for it well in the places they have that right as written in a constitution
    1
  373. Charles Huse not only not possible it doesnt work cause people would be able to make it anyway cause theres people who sell the guns/equipment/materials to make them reguardless of laws
    1
  374. luise cobian you dont have the right if you dont use it and fight back like we already shouldve been since the first "law" was even proposed cause of the shall not be infringed part
    1
  375. Ivory Devil true if theyre enforcing disarmament
    1
  376. yeah dont cause its america where its completely normal to do that cause we have the second amendment which is way better than not having it
    1
  377. Tom youre an idiot this is america and why would they be if theyre not firing at them? or if theure doing it in a safe manner? thats called paranoia lol 😂👍
    1
  378. unknown unknown nothing theyre probly a libby
    1
  379. Mickey the Luxray no its actually an antilaw cause its telling that there can be no laws against guns/weapons in any way shape or form thats whats meant by they dont actually exist 🤦🏻‍♂️ learn to understand what "shall not be infringed" means bud an infringement is a limitation and gun/weapon "laws" would be infringements its not hard to understand so until you do stop spreading lies or even if you do understand still dont
    1
  380. Mickey the Luxray i just explained why its not a "gun law" its because its saying you cant put restrictions on any type of guns/weapons im not saying because it has to do with guns or not and its not even just guns it says "arms" which just means weapons its not just short for firearms and it doesnt put any limit on what you can and cant own hence the "shall not be infringed(limited) " part of it
    1
  381. Mickey the Luxray youre still missing the point just stop arguing idiot🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  382. unknown unknown they dont hate guns/weapons they just dont want people having them and dont understand what the second amendment says or means
    1
  383. Mickey the Luxray my point is reality and youre stuck in a fantasy world 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  384. Mickey the Luxray wow youre an insanely devoted troll or really just that stupid arent you? 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  385. Mickey the Luxray this is just getting sad dude 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒 stop showing how much of an idiot you are already
    1
  386. Peter G i assure you it isnt like i said its potmetal in a highpoint thats only blowback thats heavy enough and has a heavy enough spring power if that can stand up to it in a .45 acp blowback theres no way it wouldnt with real steel brazing aside also you gotta take into account which parts are brazed together if theyre parts that dont take that much pressure then it doesnt really matter that theyre brazed
    1
  387. Timothy White too* also i dont think it is also dont underestimate something cause it doesnt look good or looks cheap or whatever
    1
  388. Timothy White actually i can cause like i said the slide is literally potmetal instead of actual steel that can hold way more pressure than potmetal ever would its the way its put together that makes even potmetal work yes its factory made or whatever but it still doesnt compare to real steel even if it is brased together like i said it only matters if the parts that are taking all that pressure are brased together
    1
  389. Black Hole Bomb how about you accept that you need to shut your mouth and do it
    1
  390. Black Hole Bomb shut up 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  391. HockeyTown Luv i dont know but it would be able to
    1
  392. Sylok, The Defiled Sylok, The Defiled wow youre an idiot i never said id test it in my hands if i was gonna test it itd be with a string from a distance just incase it did blow up but yeah what its made of does play a huge part in it and im not a 13 year old for any reason you think i am and like i said numerous times if its real steel it will hold up if a completely zinc alloy slide thats completely blowback can hold up then a steel one will definately hold up even being brazed maybe not for more than a few shots but it would definately work a little bit brass is stronger than a zinc alloy and if zinc alloy can hold up then so will brass and steel
    1
  393. Sylok, The Defiled whatever🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  394.  @OpenMawProductions  k bud whatever you say and i wasnt hating on hi points i was pointing out if a potmetal slide can handle .45 acp then steel can too even if its brazed together maybe not near as long as a hi point but it still can because the barrel is what contains most of that pressure theres hardly any pressure left being put on the slide thatd be making it come apart even being brazed together
    1
  395.  @arieheath7773  you know why its so heavy designed? cause the slide is potmetal this gun is real steel regaurdless if its brazed together or not it would still hold up better than the potmetal slide on the hi point like ive been saying to everyone else thats tried to argue that point
    1
  396.  @wes788411  wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  397. Strong Entertainment lol wouldnt be confiscated from me itd be taken from my cold dead hands first cause id fight it
    1
  398. MosinDisciple not technically even "legally" own cause the constitution says you can own any weapon you want without the governments permission
    1
  399. hjp14 its stupididty of the government and people who enforce the unconstitutional laws they pass if the law is unconstitutional like any and all laws that have been passed that dont say you can own/use any weapon you want is null and void according to the second amendnent cause it says arms not firearms and its not short for firearms and it says that right shall not be infringed no ifs ands or buts about it or any other ways around it
    1
  400. BigSwede7403 if people truly believed and fought for the second amendment the way its written you dont have to be rich to own fully auto or any weapons you please even if you have to make them
    1
  401. neverknows best not really its supply and demand because of unconstitutional laws which arent even really valid laws
    1
  402. Dylan Noll unconstitutional therefore bot valid laws but some reason we still go by them as if they were real laws cause people are scared of what will happen if they dont go by them
    1
  403. kazuma neetking not with the constitution and the way its written in the second amendment
    1
  404. Ugly German Truths i changed it thanks for pointing that out
    1
  405. pretty sure its just cause that usually means digitally downloading something not downloading the powder charge of a bullet
    1
  406.  @skybidi  its already bigger than that........🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  407.  @hussiennaeem6609  its already bigger than that gun🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  408. Purge Blade #231 lol inferior eq quipment? the russian t34 or t-34-85 took on tigers with its gun
    1
  409. Sachi Hatano if they worked 100% theyd be amazing
    1
  410. cody jackalope nope not if yoi go by whats actually legal and isnt which is every weapon
    1
  411. Wild Bill if it wasnt so unreliable maybe
    1
  412. DL - BBALL and didnt have ammo counters that let in everything in the trenches of muddy ww1
    1
  413. Charlie Ray its the slow fire rate and probly the flash hider thats like a cone
    1
  414. OGlettuceWEED not all cods have that the newer ones like modernwarfare took that into account somewhat even battlefield isnt going to be perfect or any game for that matter cause they dont want it to be too realistic cause alot more people than not dont like that much realism int he game cause its not fun to them cause its not "balanced"
    1
  415.  @bavarianpotato  hand cannons with wicks to fire and a grip to hold it with is simpler
    1
  416.  @leojensen9270  no its not he said sticking a match into a matchole not putting a wick into it and lighting it 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  417. Galdrek Weigand Kahal no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  418. he meant 900 or 1000 or 900 to 1000 rounds per minute
    1
  419.  @Papperlapappmaul  no one cares grammar nazi
    1
  420. Michael McDermott youre the complete idiot and are forgetting the second half that says "the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear "arms" (which just means weapons not certain ones and its not just short for firearms) shall not be infringed. (limited since you apparently dont know what that means) and its wasnt just cause they didnt have a standing army and wasnt just for back then or they wouldve written it to say that but they didnt they said all PEOPLE have the right to all weapons and didnt say "until a certain point in time" or "ony if its certain weapons" or "only weapons as long as they dont have certain parts or function a certain way" etc you get my point theres no way to change what they said and actually mean in it for any reason or any circumstances or after any amount of time etc the "well regulated militia" is literally anyone not in the real army or government or police that isnt corrupt who will fight the corruption physically thats why it says for the security of a free state and the well regulated part means to be well trained and actually able to fight back and stand a chance against the corrupt government cause theyll have way better weapons than you will (if you let them that is by not fighting physically against it like you should i mean) and the more people you have armed with all those weapons the beter off we are (if we're willing to do it though cause if we dont its pointless to have the second amendment)
    1
  421. wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  422.  @VampireMilf  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  423.  @tfcooks  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  424.  @BVBSEAN  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  425.  @robwilkes3351  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  426.  @jojomarujo8704  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  427.  @harveythememe1458  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  428.  @redbassist5590  no just no🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  429.  @RichardCranium321  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  430.  @Erden99  he'll be on other sites though too and im sire youtube will fail at some point because of their stupid policies no one will want to use them after they find out how bad they are and are getting more and more all the time
    1
  431.  @magister1530  no🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  432.  @CabbageBloke  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  433.  @ElLacha2  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  434.  @dscrappygolani7981  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  435.  @jeremyh6686  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  436.  @Athazago  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  437.  @dscrappygolani7981  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  438.  @kaiserwilhelmdergrosse1871  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  439. nikkorap thats not folded up it does expand when it hits but it isnt folded
    1
  440. nikkorap thats not folded up it does expand when it hits but it isnt folded
    1
  441.  @damfamyass2088  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  442.  @MrKing-he3eo  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  443.  @babakshahin3706  no 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  444.  @MrKing-he3eo  wow no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  445.  @ChrisTheGamer9999  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  446.  @bamboozlednoodle6513  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  447.  @swickzy9250  wow😒🤦🏻‍♂️😑
    1
  448.  @bamboozlednoodle6513  🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  449.  @MrKing-he3eo  whatever you say idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  450.  @bamboozlednoodle6513  wow youre such an idiot troll 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  451.  @geodkyt  nah people will be gauging all the time anymore because they prey on those because they're scared because they're eventually going to "ban" them
    1
  452.  @Gtx-ij9ff  2000 is retarded you could make a homemade one out of a nice non bullpup gun for a lot less so you have the same thing as it but for a lot cheaper
    1
  453.  @DANO-4899  that should be just a normal feature by this point how many years has that been a thing now?
    1
  454.  @0neDoomedSpaceMarine  the only reason they're so expensive is they're selling them at that price cause they know they can get it cause iff the fear that they'll be "banned" because they know eventually they will "ban" them because we aren't doing our jobs as the second amendment intends to fight the tyranny back physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  455.  @0neDoomedSpaceMarine  the only reason they're so expensive is they're selling them at that price cause they know they can get it cause iff the fear that they'll be "banned" because they know eventually they will "ban" them because we aren't doing our jobs as the second amendment intends to fight the tyranny back physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  456.  @curious-relics  nah they're actually really good cause you could sell them for double what you paid for em in a few years cause of the fear of them being "banned" and also collectors will pay big bucks for really good condition old guns like ww2 or vietnam era or whatever types from wars i wouldn't do that i'm just saying a lot of people do make big bucks off guns that way
    1
  457.  @curious-relics  nah they're actually really good cause you could sell them for double what you paid for em in a few years cause of the fear of them being "banned" and also collectors will pay big bucks for really good condition old guns like ww2 or vietnam era or whatever types from wars i wouldn't do that i'm just saying a lot of people do make big bucks off guns that way
    1
  458.  @curious-relics  nah they're actually really good cause you could sell them for double what you paid for em in a few years cause of the fear of them being "banned" and also collectors will pay big bucks for really good condition old guns like ww2 or vietnam era or whatever types from wars i wouldn't do that i'm just saying a lot of people do make big bucks off guns that way
    1
  459.  @curious-relics  nah they're actually really good cause you could sell them for double what you paid for em in a few years cause of the fear of them being "banned" and also collectors will pay big bucks for really good condition old guns like ww2 or vietnam era or whatever types from wars i wouldn't do that i'm just saying a lot of people do make big bucks off guns that way
    1
  460. @Sqwee its people jacking up the prices because of the very real threat of them being "banned" so people panic buy them before that "ban" i say it in quotes cause it can't really be "banned" in reality cause of the second amendment but people don't actually use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically so they just go by the so called "laws" they keep "passing" that keep taking away our rights
    1
  461.  @althill7407  newer design doesn't mean too much to be honest the reason they're so expensive now is cause they're preying on the very real fear of them being "banned"
    1
  462.  @althill7407  theyre preying on the fear of them being "banned"
    1
  463.  @lairdcummings9092  that's not why it's so expensive they're preying on the fear that they'll be "banned" just like all the other stuff is getting "banned" cause we keep allowing them to because we dont use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
    1
  464.  @shaggnar2014  its not just cause it's not an ar its more cause of fear of it being "banned" nowadays cause they're "banning" everything because we havent been fighting the tyranny physically like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
    1
  465. @mohammad waled  its star wars obi wan kenobi said it about lightsabers
    1
  466. John Schmidt oretty sure it was a single shot at least in the movie it was
    1
  467. Rob Sorgdrager they know they cant make everything illegal but they still try and will succeed if not enough people who care about the second amendment in the exact way its written like i do dont stand up and say enough is enough and about the thing you said about we cant defend ourselves with shovels and rakes isnt completly true some people can make awesome weapons from little to nothing and if you use the right tactics anything can be considered a "deadly weapon" lol
    1
  468. Alexsis Engle there should be an "exemption" for all of the so called "machinguns" because if they can basically call a revolver a machine gun because of "legal definitions" they can lie and call anything a machingun and you instantly become a felon for owning something that definately isnt a machine gun in reality "legal" definition" is definately not reality a real machinegun is something you hold down the trigger on and it keeps firing not shoots two bullets then stops unless you pull the trigger again
    1
  469. the original ksg
    1
  470. Guns N' Games its not for Looks but yeah it does look a lot better on an ak than an hk
    1
  471. Hack World youre right but you said alot of unnecessary words and made it sound stupid
    1
  472. wjerame dude no just no it doesnt matter what they think it only matters if if its constitutional or not
    1
  473. Smith & Wesson wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  474. Lex Bright Raven thats not how the second amendment/constitution works which is how we make our laws bud 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  475. Exploatores they made props they wouldnt have to buy one
    1
  476. Elijah Decker they could make one today alot cheaper id say if multiple companies made them youd be able to get one quite a bit cheaper cause someone would find a cheaper way of doing it if they had competition also ot depends on what the company would want to charge or have to charge based on how it was made and alot of other variables and if it was made by taurus you could definately get it cheaper than that they make pretty quality stuff for the prices they sell their guns for
    1
  477. Jon Keil you gotta think about what the gun actually is though thats ridiculous for a revolver that just ejects spent cases automatically with a gas system you could just have one of the ones we have now drilled for a gas port and modified to do that for alot less than buying a gun already made at that price just cause the people making and selling it want to charge that for it
    1
  478.  @Panzer_Runner  you could make one cheaper than that
    1
  479. William Sager dude if testing a gun is too dangerous wed never have new guns
    1
  480. tm turn yours on there are guns even older than this that can still shoot and are shot by modern people lol😂👌🏻
    1
  481. Kurt Jakins it could happen hes tested other really rare guns before also someone could build a replica
    1
  482. jason127x99 i dont think anybody classifies anything right or he had them classify it as that but he did try to ban it and i say try because it doesnt matter what anybody in the government says or classifies it as the second amendment makes it null and void any law that bans any weapon in any way cause it says the right of the people to keep and bear arms(which is weapons not firearms and its not short for firearms) shall not be infringed. period no ofs and or buts and an infringement is any limitation to any weapon or accessory because if you ban accessories you can ban all guns they would word it as any device that can fire a round would be banned therefore banning all guns
    1
  483. you know hes talked about holsters before not as often as guns but he has
    1
  484. Jaime Duarte it doesnt have to but stupid people will inevitably do it
    1
  485. Adam Lewellen and that’s why they’re idiots no gun can do anything by itself
    1
  486. if youd be stupid enough to pay that
    1
  487. demonized uhh what?
    1
  488. lasarousi depends on whos on the recieving end who its safe for 🤦🏻‍♂️ also a gun isnt "exclusively made to harm or kill" they actually make nonlethal ammo for guns thats specifically designed not to kill and just wound also even if it were "exclusively designed for killing or harming" it could and is used for different things i hate when people use that excuse or line of "logic" its so stupid cause people use things for other things than what they were designed for all the time
    1
  489. Moral Monster no its because theyre designed around the "laws" we have now that "ban" certain types of guns
    1
  490. mistakenot ou you could if you took the gaurds off and only had the actual razor part thats like saying anything thats "safe" cant be used for that anything can hurt you if used in a certain way
    1
  491. Jamie you know its better to just not be stupid than have to put some kind of mechanism on a gun and rely on that and think youre good right? mechanisms can and do fail whether its frequent or not is irrelevant more safety mechanisms have got more people killed than accidents cause someone forgot to go by the safety rules which make safeties on guns redundant
    1
  492. Jay Fude wow just wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  493. Moral Monster wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  494. Seelenschmiede wow just wow 🤦🏻‍♂️ how about we teach people instead?
    1
  495.  @fademusic1980  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  496. this looks like a scaled up kolibri
    1
  497. Avitus Nonius Midwestern Legion look up ecco machine he does way better than this to be honest
    1
  498. he made the original minigun lol
    1
  499. Raymo_2_u this is literally like the mingun of its time i mean multiple barrels and 200 and something rounds all at once being fired when most people were using single loaded muskets
    1
  500. UK violent crime rate is 2x higher than USA's rate it is a dumb argument if you mean they didnt know technology would advance and this video is proof of that this is basically the minigun of that era and even looks like one the only thing its missing is cased cartridges and a motor to spin the barrels
    1
  501.  @samuellubell4557  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  502.  @samuellubell4557  no they don't
    1
  503.  @The_Lucent_Archangel  they know why they say it it's just to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons it's like why they call "hunting" bolt action rifles with scopes "sniper rifles" and stuff like that and semiautos fully semiautos cause they know their stupid followers will go by it without questioning it
    1
  504.  @Bourikii2992  the people are the militia not the government also it doesn't matter what you tell them they won't get it and will still say it can be limited or only if states allow you or the federal government or whatever that's the whole point of the second amendment is to fight back against tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that so if we dont use the second amendment it's useless to say we have it or any other rights for that matter
    1
  505.  @Bourikii2992  actually none are cause you can use pretty much anything to assault people with so it just makes it a stupid made up redundant word to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons i don't remember where it was but i think they even "banned" butter knives like you can't walk around with a butterknife on you for self defense or some other nonsense like that
    1
  506.  @charlessmith6412  welcome if you're not being sarcastic or whatever
    1
  507. Zain Asif oh no the bad guys will regaurdles only the idiot people who go by that nonsense will do what you said
    1
  508. they kinda do make a modern version of this id like if they made muzzle loaders period that would take smokeless powder instead of black powder thatd be pretty cool cause then you get more power out of it
    1
  509. Jack Vernian not really
    1
  510. Gabbertjee they also said it was supposed to be an accurate to real life game though too ta know 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  511. @YoYo NoNo but they werent all used in the war so no its not real world accurate they said they wanted it as real as possible and thats not realistic at all to have and use guns that werent ever used in the war
    1
  512.  La Nausée  k whatever you say bud
    1
  513. Jackie Fife r/youreanidiot
    1
  514. geo_K_gaming r/youreanidiot
    1
  515. probly it adds more complexness to a system when if you make a mag fed gun right it will function alot better simpler is usually the way to go when making guns that work better just look at open bolt smgs theres pretty much nothing to go wrong with those and thats why they work so well
    1
  516. EB video wow no one cares grammar nazi 😂
    1
  517. H7 pubgm grammar nazi owned more like it the one saying all he overthrew was grammar no one cares at all about if someone doesnt spell perfect
    1
  518. Boris Buliak nah they wont ban cars cause "they werent designed solely to kill" like guns and knives etc (being totally serious cause theyre really that stupid)
    1
  519. Dan Cotton not the usa idiot the government that we have now thats tyrannical and so unconstitutional its unbelievable unconstitional "laws" are unlawful thats the whole point of the constitution but if we dont fight for it then we might as well not have it
    1
  520. Fin it is a totalitarian government or some other kind thats bad whatwver you want to call it it isnt a constitutional one thats for sure and unconstitutional "laws" arent lawful or real laws but we wont use our second amendment rights to keep them in check so its pointless if we dont use it to have it but people dont see it that way and are too scared of jailtime or death to come together and fight for it
    1
  521. Jonathan Tricoli wow just wow -_-
    1
  522. Ethan Lamoureux people that want to do all the evil stuff dont even go by the numbers they just make up bullcrap for gullible enough people to believe and go with without question cause they dont know any better
    1
  523. Ethan Lamoureux yeah and people driving cars can hurt and kill people too but you dont hear anyone trying to ban cars for that reason "because thats not what they were designed for" give me a break things can be used for more than the purpose they were intended for and are used for different purposes the person using them gives them thwir purpose not "what they were intended to do"
    1
  524. Damian thats not even the point they dont care what can and cant be done with them they just want control over wveryone in every way and they cant do that as long as youre armed
    1
  525. ShoesAndStuff what does the population have to do with anything? nothing thats what
    1
  526. ShoesAndStuff or alot of other stuff they dont think they should ban "because they arent solely made to kill" yeah they really think that way it doesnt mattee what it was intended for it depends on what the person who uses it uses it for
    1
  527. Ethan Lamoureux and all kinds of other crap that "wasnt intended for killing/violence like cars or acid etc
    1
  528. Ethan Lamoureux also criminals dont follow "laws" so you know theyre no less likely to be shot than anyone else just cause they have "laws" that say theyre not allowed to do something also they got way worse things than just shootings they got bombings, acid attacks, and running over people etc
    1
  529. Nagow_ nah you arent safer you got way worse stuff and just having "laws" that say people cant do certain things doesnt mean it wont happen
    1
  530. Frank McGovern no "laws" dont guarantee that it wont happen cause CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW "LAWS"
    1
  531. Stale Bagelz yeah cause takimg away their defenses against all the threats we face isnt the worst of it all if you take that away they can do all those worse things you mentioned if not they cant cause the people would have military grade weapons to fight back against them so no we arent "just ignoring all the other stuff"
    1
  532. Wolfang cutthroat youre an idiot if we actually went by the second amendment we wouldnt "only have rifles" like you say wed have the same tech as they do and tech isnt the only factor or doesnt always gaurantee victory or superiority
    1
  533. John Smith yeah i think you got your parties mixed up bud conservatives dont want all this stupid crap that does no good but for criminals who DONT FOLLOW THE "LAWS"
    1
  534. Frank McGovern wow youre a complete idiot
    1
  535. Colin Cleveland still yall we still got way more guns than youll ever have again unarmed nations are the ones who have mass genocides cause they have nothing to fight back with learn from history bud look at all the countries that had their weapons taken from them then got slaughtered by their own "government"
    1
  536. James Ricker youre an idiot read and understand what the second amendment says and means then cone back to this conversation we should have everything the military has for that very purpose and even if we dont the tech and weapons doesnt gaurantee a victory for them
    1
  537. MrYfrank14 its not before democrats its before we let them take over with their unconstitutional bullcrap "laws" we shouldve just shot them on the spot even talking about banning inanimate objects but all the people on the government were the same way thats why they got passed anyone who actually believes in the second amendment doesnt want any regulation of any kind except you know people who do bad things with them go to jail or die because the good people would defend themselves against them
    1
  538. thesweatleaf it doesnt even matter what side did what to be honest trump claimed to be republican and pro second amendment his whole campaign and when he got in signed anti gun bill through exectutive order no less to make it even worse yet people think hes still on our side the first and second amendments are our best defense against tyranny and if hes trying to take either or both of those away in any increment then hes a big threat not a good guy at all
    1
  539. Mrjohnnymoo1 freedom keeps the peace not makes it more afngerous but i get what youre saying people should be armed
    1
  540. considered by the atf people who actually know what theyre talking about call them stocked pistols
    1
  541. USSEnterpriseA1701 the atf of run by decieving people or legitamately dont know or care about what firearms actually are or how they operate their definition of a machine gun is any gun that can fire more than one bullet at a time per trigger pull in their definition that could be a double barrel shotgun its all deceptive so they can ban all guns by getting people on their side about banning them because the people theyre trying to convince are scared of them already or dont know anything about guns either
    1
  542. bindingcurve more accurate maybe because you can stablise it but no more deadly it still fires the same round and anything can literally be deadly even air if used a certain way so what should we do? ban air? lol no inanimate object should be banned the people who do bad things should be put in jail instead of punishing everyone for what the few stupid people do by banning owning an in animate object that cant do anything by itself
    1
  543. TheFanatical1 your comments good but i have one tweak its that they consider it to be more concealable if its shorter but like you said its not going to be
    1
  544. Woistdeingott yeah and youll also notice it was people in a large group of people in close proximity of each other so having a pistol or unstocked weapon makes no difference whatsoever whether theyre more accurate or not cause theyre so close and so many even if the sprayed randomly in the direction of the crowd theyd still hit a ton of them and a stock or not doesnt make any dofference of the ballistics of the round
    1
  545. bindingcurve mass shooting happen where there are a lot of people in close proximity to each other like concerts youd actually wanna be less accurate and youd hit more people shooting in their general direction and killing more or hitting more
    1
  546.  @Predalien195  i see but they dont say mama they say ma so just say ma it doesnt sound right saying mama deuce
    1
  547.  @Predalien195  ah...
    1
  548. Yourflyisundone this is basically the original version of that minus that in the chassis of the fmg is a glock long barrel full auto and the hotchkiss still looks like a gun thats just been folded and the fmg looks like a radio or something incospicous
    1
  549. Maryus Knight thats basically what an fmg 9 is a folding long barrel glock with a chassis that makes it look inconspicous
    1
  550. this isnt semiauto though and its bullpup
    1
  551. Daeighve Geoughnns actually it is the action is behind the trigger
    1
  552. Stanley Jedrzejczyk i know youre being sarcastic with the words but some people will think youre serious and go woth that its not even funny anymore the way they think its actually scary cause its actually happening and people dont see it and label us crazy
    1
  553. ManScoutsofAmerica it wont even be "outlawed" just unconstitutionally ebforced by thugs that only care about their pay and "just following orders" cause theyre so greedy
    1
  554. Stanley Jedrzejczyk maybe cause the criminals wouldnt use them like that also the government is ran by criminals if its illegal to have those items and they have them theyre breaking the law and thats the definition of a criminal
    1
  555. ManScoutsofAmerica no rifle or weapon is actually illegal but the people who dont believe in the second amendment and are lying about it dont care and are the ones enforcing it unconstitutional "laws" arent really laws the constitution literally is to limit what can and cant be done by the government not to limit the people
    1
  556. tenofprime youre right anout the way the so called "laws" work but they arent even real laws if they restrict firearms or an weapon for that matter cause the constitution literally says the right of the people to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
    1
  557. The Arsenal Gamer no effect* news flash criminals will have what they want regaurdless of laws they need to punish those who do what was already illegal regaurdless of what weapon they used to do it with
    1
  558. kabob 007 not only that the way its worded in the second amendment doesnt mention and certain "arms" which are what weapons are called to be off the table in terms of wwhat can be owned it say the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall mot be infringed. not unless (insert a reason here)
    1
  559. Razor 1uk criminals are gonna get guns and hardened criminals wont care if theyve gone to jail or "lost their rights" they wont lose anything to be honest
    1
  560. Zach cash thats a good point but statistics are the game of the lefties and they use lies of statistics its not a matter of who is doing what percent of killings with what firearm/weapon its the fact that the government is being irrational to ban inanimate objects for ownership/use because criminals are using them ruining it for everyone when they should just put the people in jail that actually use them for crimes
    1
  561. Not Patrick if its leftist ideals then yes they use any deceptive nature/tactics they can to make people believe them and be on their side to ban inanimate objects for everyone to not be able to own/use them instead of putting the people with bad intent in jail instead
    1
  562. Shadrach Van Solan thats the way it should be but tyranny doesnt protect the rights of its people only the governments rights to rule the most effectual way to enslave the population is to disarm them
    1
  563. King Schultz i hope youre being sarcastic cause stupid people wont get the sarcasm if you are
    1
  564. thats even more powerful its .454 casull
    1
  565. no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  566. Phil McCrevice (obviously sarcasm)yeah cause thatd work we dont want to kill the enemy just take out their big weapon theyre in and let em come out and kill us with their smaller weapons
    1
  567. [REDACTED] that depends how you look at it yes they do take lives but imagine if someone killed hitler before he commited the holocaust that woulda saved millions of lives
    1
  568. [REDACTED] funny you qoutw the bible "living by the sword" doesnt mean self defense it means if you murder and stuff like that the bible also says sell your cloak and buy a sword for self protection ((not exactly those words but thats what it means (and the sword means a weapon its symbolic nowadays cause thats what they had back then nowadays we have guns and a ton of other things) )
    1
  569. InsanoBinLooney wow youre an idiot
    1
  570. Glynn Donahue lol talking about immoral or not when youre talking about war thats hilarious they do everything else but oh no we cant use this or that cause it makes people suffer think about all the people who lived theough it with what they did use and tell me they didnt suffer it makes no sense at all
    1
  571. NuclearHobo42 i wouldnt say all pacifism is naive and ignorant stuff thats small and doesnt hurt or kill anyone that doesnt need to be doesnt deserve violence
    1
  572. cross no they think its "unethical" or "cruelty" to make them suffer but theu dont think about the people that come home with wounds from the stuff they would allow you to kill each other with in war how much they suffer
    1
  573. Reck Yourself (obviously sarcasm)yeah cause everything else they would allow people to kill each other with arent just as horrible when they dont get killed by it and just get wounded so they gotta live with it even after the war is over for them
    1
  574. Reck Yourself what if they survive thw gunshot though? then they gotta survive and suffer even longer the gas would kill them on the battlefield almost guaranteed
    1
  575. Kommissar Knusprig "war crimes" lol 😂 sounds like germany in ww1 saying "shotguns were "overpowered" and "inhumane"" when they used flamethrowers and mustard gas and tanks that blow people up etc
    1
  576. cross you cant argue logic with stupid or evil intention people they always try to justify it through nonlogical means like they weree bullied even if they werent or just lie in any way possible to try to justify the evil they commit
    1
  577. ya live and learn everyday and i kinda expected something like this to come up eventually and im glad it did it shows the liberals are full of crap not like i didnt know that before but still it just reinforces it
    1
  578. Pitch Lock they had way better stuff than this in ww1 lol they wouldntve used this even desperate they had better last ditch guns
    1
  579. Rrolf it is by legal definition of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull (which is complete bullcrap cause that would make a double barrel that fires two shells with one trigger a machine gun) when a real one keeps firing as the trigger is held down not two bullets then reload or anything else like that (thats the atfs interpretations for ya dumber than rocks)
    1
  580. korblborp if its pressurized water it pushes all the powder out
    1
  581. Hitchhike the World it was ancient rocket powered arrows or just ancient rockets alone it was called a hwatcha or how ever you spell it
    1
  582. TactaGhoul yep basically the only difference is a motor and modern cartridges and a huge fire rate and electrical on off button to fire it
    1
  583. 1337penguinman the real definition of a machine gun can be like this gun like ian said its a runaway machinegun not a controllable one that you can hold the trigger down and keep shooting or not when you let it go
    1
  584. Why Jay doesnt have to be "selfloading" to be a machinegun its about how it fires when pulling the trigger you can pull it once and it shoots all the bullets or like nowadays machinguns you can control the fire by holding it down or taking your finger off the trigger and stopping it
    1
  585. Sérgio Henrique a beltan flintlock was more just a repeater cause you had to turn the barrel manually im pretty sure to fire the next round not even close to a machine gun or even if it had a semiauto mechanism still not a machinegun like this is i think ian explained it the best way that its a runaway machinegun cause you either fire all at once or nothing but it doesnt literally fire every bullet at once it which would make it volley fire it fires a sequence of bullets until its empty
    1
  586. Omar Torres 5.56 out of a minigun doesnt have to be that bad to be honest i mean if you got 50 rounds a second coming out of it its gonna do a ton of damage
    1
  587. Omar Torres you could carry it alot easier than a real minigun thats 308/7.62x51 nato and put a stock and pistol grip instead of just a pistolgrip like in one of those games where its fired like a rocket launcher
    1
  588. Omar Torres lol "onlyweighs 28 pounds" you could have a barrett m82 for that weight or close to it
    1
  589.  @DeliveryMcGee  you dont know what a machinegun is of you think it isnt its literally a runaway machinegun
    1
  590.  @jrggrop  machineguns are machineguns therefore are real machineguns either way so they had machineguns when blackpowder was around instead of smokeless
    1
  591.  @Pitchlock8251  highly doubt it they had better guns and even then they called them obsolete or whatever
    1
  592.  @as-jp5cl  black powder is too dirty even with a flushing device youd have to flush it way too often this machinegun was just basically a bunch of barrels all put together though so it could fire continuously not like a gas system and a bolt etc like that that we think of today
    1
  593.  @rrolf71  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  594.  @Notjustcar  theyre called hwatchas or something like that i cant remember how its spelled
    1
  595.  @TactaGhoul  the basic design was handcranked so not a machinegun also definately not the same original design cause of that
    1
  596.  @whyjay9959  doesnt have to be it fires all the rounds that are loaded with one operation of the flintlock action one after the other doesnt matter if it loads itself or not its not like modern machineguns with bolts and gas systems like you think of today
    1
  597.  @SgtKOnyx  doesnt make it any less of one though
    1
  598.  @trinova9581  but this one wasnt like that cause its basically just a bunch of musket barrels all put together so they fire all the rounds in it one after the other with one action of the flintlock which is the basic principle of a machinegun
    1
  599.  @christoph8365  not in their minds but a machingun is a machinegun in reality thats a big reason but not the main one why its stupid to go by their "legal" "classicifications"/"laws" regaurding guns/weapons the main one is that its literally against the law to make any "laws" that limit what we can and cant have weaponwise in any way or for any reason cause of the second amendment
    1
  600.  @trinova9581  and? like i said a machinegun is a machinegun doesnt matter what type it is
    1
  601.  @trinova9581  they shoot all of them at once this shoots one and then ignites the other continuously which is what a machinegun does thats a big difference between volleyfire guns and machineguns i didnt say volleyfire guns are machineguns i said machineguns are machineguns no matter what type they are (meaning what system it uses like this flintlock one that uses the single action of the flintlock to ignite rounds one by one until theyre out of ammo) not that they fired all the bullets literally in one shot
    1
  602.  @trinova9581  also even if its controlled or not it doesnt change how it fires it still is firing like a machinegun fires one working of the flintlock action and it fires all or as many as you put in it if it doesnt get hung up or something else that could go wrong just like a modern machinegun would the only difference is like you said its you shoot all of them or you dont shoot at all basically instead of modern day with a trigger that you can choose hpw many rounds you shoot
    1
  603.  @trinova9581  youre not getting what im saying at all if you think its the same think of the volley gun as a shotgun instead of how youre thinking of it and then think of the flintlock machinegun as single shots being fired each time the gun fires instead of the fact that it fires all of them yes it fires all of them but not all of the bullets at once like a volley gun in one big shot like a shotgun 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  604.  @trinova9581  thats the nowadays version of a machinegun what we think of them nowadays and i dont care if they dont consider it what it is theyre wrong theu just dont want to admit they had way better stuff than regular muskets back in the day cause they want to be right cause they know theyre wrong
    1
  605. Hunter Drone47 26 cant trade freedom for safety period
    1
  606. The Gaming Kitsune everywhere is becoming like that because of idiots like them but also idiots that say theyre for the second amendment but wont fight (physically) the people who enforce these lies they call "laws"
    1
  607. Jason Dubya-DEEZNUTS because the second amendment and being able to fight the government and other evil people*
    1
  608. Jeffrey Smith youre the idiot that should delete your comment cause its not funny to joke about unless youre insane cause this is real life and people really do believe that way or believe theyre being serious so we dont need those idiots making other idiots believe this crap
    1
  609. Caboose 92m wow defending the bad guys you must be one then
    1
  610.  @austinknox5217  all submachineguns and machineguns etc are "fully transferrable" because of the second amendment but the government tells us otherwise and threatens jailtime or death if we fight back agajnst it physically like we shouldve been doing for a long time now so we just cave and go with it instead of physically fighting against it like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place so the government cant have too much power but it only works if we use it as intended cause tyrants dont care about the actual law or their limits of power unless made to by force
    1
  611.  @tricky2055  the nra isnt on our side anymore and you shouldnt have to be in the nra or some other association or whatever to be able to own a gun just notve committed any actual crimes that are violent or like rape or something like that in reality because of the second amendment just being born in america gives you that right and the fact that its written in our laws that they arent allowed to "ban" any type of weapon for any reason or after any amount of time etc like that
    1
  612.  @justarandomtechpriest1578  no the problem is they dont care if anyone says youre crazy or not their end goal is total disarmament anyway so they can enslave and kill millions of innocents without any resistance cause theyre pure evil just like what happened with all the other countries governments that disarmed all their people then killed millions of innocents like nazi germany and alot of communist countries like russia and china etc and thats whatll happen here if people just keep caving to the so called "laws" they "pass" slowly taking more and more of our rights until we have none and nothing to fight back for them with
    1
  613.  @A_real_brick  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  614.  @glimpyrimpy6258  uh what?
    1
  615.    all gun/weapon "laws" are infringements except the second amendment to be honest cause it says "arms" (weapons and not just certain ones etc like that) and "shall not be infringed." period. no ifs ands or buts to make it changeable in any way or after any amount of time or for any reason etc
    1
  616.  @lizgayle14  it doesnt and thats why millions of innocent people have died by it cause they gave up their guns/weapons and didnt fight back against the tyranny like we shouldve been doing for a long time now but we just keep caving cause we dont want to physically fight it for fear of jailtime or death or because we're brainwashed into believing they can make these so called "laws" against the constitution and we that we have to go by them just "cause theyre the government"
    1
  617.  @mjnyc8655  wow🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  618.  @these_go_to_11  literally none have happened because of that you just sound stupid whether thats a joke or not and if we had our own and were willing to use them for self defense and the defense of others without fear of jailtime or death if we did from the corrupt police/government that we shouldve been fighting physically like the second amendment intends (we as in the good guys) we could stop it from happening all together before they even kill one innocent person but the corrupt government/police know this but they dont care their power over you and their own self is all they care about they know full well its bad what theyre doing but dont care cause we dont make them care by force like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  619.  @ryanlorenzo5003  since its america you dont have to register or anything the government says in reality cause of the second amendment but the so called "laws" they "pass" are the whole point of the second amendment is to be able to fight them physically and effectively with any weapon you please without anything they say you ""need" for it to be llegal"
    1
  620.  @jasonfeek6284  you could just make or buy one off the black market and then not tell anyone about it you know or if someone does fond out fight for your right to have it second amendment or not tyranny shouldnt be tolerated anywhere cause its always bad no matter where it is or when it happens
    1
  621.  @knifedance2402  duh cause actual bad guys or actual second amendment supporters arent gonna have those guns and the actual good people wouldnt use them for that purpose
    1
  622.  @n16161  guns/weapons* and we wont have them for long if we dont fight back physically against the so called "laws" they "pass" and just keep caving when they "pass" more new "laws" against the constitution/second amendment cause we keep letting them with not fighting back against it
    1
  623.  Ben Siener  i know all about the fake stuff making people paranoid and all that and what are you talking about with loading something?
    1
  624.  @Strawberry92fs  ok bud whatever you say 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  625.  Ben Siener  ah i see i think it should be a winder that takes the spring tension off and im thinking its 180 not 200 like the name says i could be wrong on the capacity and id have to rewatch the video to see if he said how much they hold or if they had diffferentcapacities maybe he said they had two different types cant remember though
    1
  626.  Ben Siener  i watched it again its 177 for the lowest capacity
    1
  627.  @glimpyrimpy6258  (sacasm) yeah cause they definately dont steal them or make their own or buy them from a private seller that isnt an ffl that circumvents all the so called "laws" they "pass" yep its definately unlikely 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒 give me a break
    1
  628.  @glimpyrimpy6258  they dont care about that though they just want to be right so they ignore meanings of words or leave out certain parts so theyd be right thats how they work they decieve people into thinking theyre right when they arent
    1
  629.  @glimpyrimpy6258  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  630.  @glimpyrimpy6258  or make your own or buy privately instead of a "legal" gunstore or anything else they wouldnt even know about and circumvents the so called "laws" they "pass"
    1
  631.  @glimpyrimpy6258  they literally make guns/ammo that are supposed to be non lethal its if you want to stop someone without killing them i agree that its kinda pointless unless its a gun that instanly knocks them out no matter what to stop them but eh people have to learn one way or the other that thats kinda pointless and some people will learn it the hard way cause thats the only way they can cause theyre that stupid
    1
  632.  @glimpyrimpy6258  maybe because people dont want to take the time or effort to make or steal or find someone who will sell them it without a background check or whatever else the government says "you "need" for it to be "legal"" and its just easier to get the regular guns ever think about that?
    1
  633.  @glimpyrimpy6258  not "no one" its just not as common as the "legal" weapons
    1
  634.  @charlesangell_bulmtl  some people are im not one that can just be told something and expected to just go with it like the bullcrap that gun/weapon control worls cause its obvious that it doesnt and only puts a strain on the good people or people who will actually go by the so called "laws" they "pass" that are against the constitution
    1
  635.  @Face2theScr33n  have you discovered no one likes grammar nazis? and i can do it i just dont care cause im not a grammar nazi like you 😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  636. LaserSharkSushi it would work even with a rifle matt carriker tried it and the germans in ww2 did it its called a krumlauf
    1
  637.  @IncredibleMD  was i ever arguing for the communist? no i was just saying what the nazis did
    1
  638.  @splifstar85  😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  639.  @mangoman835  😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  640.  @FernandoHernandez-jw4yy  😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  641.  @fromthebackseat4865  😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  642.  @c0461-e1s  😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  643.  @White_Recluse  wow😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  644.  @gabrielpollman5133  😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  645. Daniel Vedberg Sekulic magwell* not weld
    1
  646. Daniel Vedberg Sekulic auto uncorrect*
    1
  647. Michael Hunt modern tanks wouldnt be near as vulnerable to rpgs especially since they more than likely have those trophy systems now that can stop rockets dead in their tracks blowing them up before they hit the tank in the first place
    1
  648. AremStefaniaK uhh what?
    1
  649. Michael Hunt you know its not like in the games right? they probly would have more sytems to put onto the tanks (if they do actually run on a battery or some other type of power device that would run out after so many uses instead of like running off the power of the tanks engine or a generator)
    1
  650. Michael Hunt they already have that basically its more like a high energy concentrated heat beam than a laser but they have it that will do that thats basically a trophy system like i said nothing "went over my head" and i was talking about the system on the tanks not the rockets theyd be firing
    1
  651. Wow youre an idiot even as a joke that’s not funny
    1
  652. Stalin wow youre an idiot even as a joke that’s not funny
    1
  653. thats what all enblock clip type guns are if it didnt have an internal non removable magazine it wouldnt function cause thered be no spring and follower to push it up into the barrel to cycle the gun unless the box that would be a magazine is on top and its a bolt action gun and its gravity fed then you dont need a spring just some guides to make it drop into the gun
    1
  654. idiot liberals and snowflakes look at a stock on anything:this is a rifle*
    1
  655. encarn speed loader
    1
  656. Ur Boy Seth so youd want to have to make your own upper? or buy a really expensive upper in addition to the already expensive lower? doesnt make too much sense to just make the functional gun unfunctional and the upper that came off of it would be the ony one that would work on that lower cause its a open bolt type lower or other uppers that are the m231 will work on it but those are really rare unless you want to make your own upper thats like that so you dont pay a crazy amount for a "transferrable" one which is what id do cause screw the government they have no right to tell us what we can and cant have in ant way cause if the second amendment
    1
  657. pretty sure they just wanted to make something different with this gun youre thinking of politicians making solutions for problems that dont exist
    1
  658. It would be if it weren’t for the periscope and the metal rod that’s connected to the bolt to cycle it
    1
  659. the weapon isnt against you its how the designers designed it cause the object itself is inanimate
    1
  660. scottski02 no just no
    1
  661. Abdul Qadir Baban no just no
    1
  662. JJ Tomeček no just no
    1
  663. trade mark theres literally a flintlock machinegun this thing is nothing look up the forgotten weapons video on it
    1
  664. ExplosiveFetus idiot
    1
  665. Clowny McClownface idiot
    1
  666. Raffica no
    1
  667. Fire Power701 youre an idiot just like the person who posted the original comment
    1
  668. Michael Price youre stupid if you think thats a stupid idea what if you run out of ammo and cant get to a melee weapon in time?
    1
  669. Ryan Ewald the only part i see right about your comment is that the political "leaders" definately dont care how bad war is and they want war apparently cause plenty of people have made it known that they wont allow people to take their weapons without a fight and until its from thwir dead hands but all they can see is the power theyll get from disarming you cause theyre so greedy
    1
  670. Grey Bayles all wars that arent taking out truly evil forces like nazi germany or any communist place or arent self defensive are pointless to be honest
    1
  671. warship satin firearms/weapons
    1
  672. Harry Mu both are pistols some people just say theres a difference to be honest
    1
  673. Broken Wave teah but so are semiautos it makes no sense to say a pistol or a revolver
    1
  674. C.J. uhh what?
    1
  675. onagda id hope so
    1
  676.  @Tokito935  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  677.  @KKnifeBelly  i dont care 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  678. @Psycho Mantis wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  679.  @bmhead9066  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  680. B.D.B. even then it would stull eject loaded rounds and the pressure of the first rounds gas also could detonate the next round and blow the whole gun up
    1
  681. TwoTsOnTheTrail you dont know how pressure works if you think the smaller hole makes it less if its smaller with the pressure of a round being fired goes through it it has more power than if the hole was bigger
    1
  682. Corwin Hyatt or even making the round fire
    1
  683. who said it was one target?
    1
  684. Curtis Lee suppressive fire just keeps their heads down or them in hiding until someone can get a shot on them not to kill the person
    1
  685. G its 7.62x54r its not that rare the guns and belts and magazines and stuff are probly more rare
    1
  686. wow🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  687. wow🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  688. its cause we dont do our jobs like the second amendment intends to fight back physically against the tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  689.  @bugwar5545  theyre not free lands if theres any tyranny which there is then its not really free and no its cause we dont use the second amendment as intended to fight back physically against the tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them them or voting etc like that
    1
  690.  @thenoblepoptart  also cause we dont fight back physically against the tyranny like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talkinng to them or voting etc like that
    1
  691. winkleried they probly figrued it out and disabled em before they got em if its true
    1
  692. America was born from guns basically though and correct me if I’m wrong but pretty sure Romania isn’t exactly too for their “civilians” having guns or its really hard to if not impossible
    1
  693. Austin Bartose who says it isn’t? There can be people from places where it’s not a usual name ya know
    1
  694. Emil 111 probly to stop things from happening there again like what happened in Germany called the holocaust and that’s usually how it starts they take away your rights to owning things that would make it very hard for them to take control to do whatever they want to you
    1
  695. c s no country is trusting civilians with guns anymore even in America yes we still have some weapons but more than not are going by the so called “laws” they “pass” because they’re too scared to fight back we should have a ton more weapons and a ton less “legal” restrictions on getting them but people don’t understand they don’t care what constitutional power they’re limited to doesn’t matter to them because they’re tyrants who misuse their power I believe even without a constitution people should go against tyrants like in the other countries and stuff
    1
  696. too bad theres no such thing as an "assault" anything unless its literally just named that to make fun of the liberals
    1
  697.  @parkercushingable  itd be legal anyway second amendment says you can't put any "laws" on what we can own/use weapon or weapon related wise
    1
  698.  @bradymiller7334  they'll take all of our weapons if we keep allowing them to by not using the second amendment as intended to fight tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  699.  @kaiserwilhelmdergrosse1871  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  700.  @crazysilly2914  no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  701. Mors Vincit Omnia if its a smaller diameter bullet less than .35 caliber then it wont leave any rifling marks thats what makes it impossible to trace
    1
  702. OMAR ADRIANI "illegal"* cause of the second amendment no weapon is actually illegal unless like you said youre committing an actual crime having it like stealing it or committing an actual crime like murder or rape or robbing etc like that with it
    1
  703. you mean rifling indentions but yeah if you use undersized bullets it wont happen like that
    1
  704. you mean rifling indentions but yeah if you use undersized bullets it wont happen like that
    1
  705. id say its a ""legal" issue" cause we have stupid people that make stupid "laws" that just want to control everything everyone does and they cant do that unless they take all weapons away from everyone but the bad guys cause they are the bad guys
    1
  706.  @thecoolestdaniel4554  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  707.  @uztoq  wow😒🤦🏻‍♂️😑
    1
  708.  @uztoq  no i wont "stfu" and i dont care if you think im being annoying or not
    1
  709.  @uztoq  whatever you say idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  710. Gallowglass its the old day lmg or suppressing fire weapon
    1
  711. The Rogue Wolf thats just common sense when its literally fully automatic after you do whatever the trigger mechanism is on that and you could just leave it and itll keep firing until its empty
    1
  712. Victor Waddell thatd be more dangerous cause then itd be raining bullets down on the people all around it
    1
  713. Deux Voul yeah ok whatever you say bud ive heard everything you can say
    1
  714.  @jessicagray8852  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  715. SanguisDiabolus he already does that and hollywood doesnt help the fact like the other people who replied to your comment said ive seen cowboy movies with six shooters and they never reload unless its for dramatic effect or whatever you call it
    1
  716. J B does no good yo just know we have to actually fight physically as the second amendment intends or this crap aint going anywhere
    1
  717. Robert Slackware its not an "assault weapon" anyway vause theres no such thing anything can be used as a weapon to assault people with even a fork
    1
  718. J B you know the atf bow classifies bumpfire stocks (just the sticks themselves bot even attached to a gun) a machinegun? its all just bullcrap excuses to "ban" more guns/weapons thats their ticket to banning semiautos and we just let it happen nect they'll go after bolt actions for being "sniper rifles" and shotguns theyll say "spread too much" and then the single shots theyll say "are too simple to use"
    1
  719. zach nies it uses shotgun shells he explained that
    1
  720. i really doubt its supposed to do that cause it has a last round hold open which is way better than locking open before you shoot the last round and is way more useful cause then that little time it takes to chamber that last round manually is all it takes to get shot and killed if you dont get it chambered and aimed and fired again
    1
  721.  @bcubed72  no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  722.  @bcubed72  no just no🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  723. theres plenty of those types of guns to be honest p.a. luty made submachineguns from hardware store stuff only that worked
    1
  724.  @conzmoleman  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  725.  @BananaPhoPhilly  no alot do know how but they wont for fear of jailtime or death if they do defend themselves and wont fight the unlawful jailing
    1
  726.  @jamallabarge2665  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  727.  @jamallabarge2665  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  728.  @joshthemigpro1733  wow youre am idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  729. funny how he said if its .45acp blowback you dont want to shoot it hi point is blowback and the slides junk metal
    1
  730. wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  731.  @jonnytest55  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  732.  @jonnytest55  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  733.  @CrazyDog651  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  734.  @burnyburnoutze2nd  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  735. @Ferro Equus it'll be everywhere if you go by their "laws"
    1
  736.  @craighansen7594  won't happen if you keep going by their "laws"
    1
  737.  @chemistryofquestionablequa6252  but won't happen if you keep following their "laws"
    1
  738. probly not modern ones
    1
  739. "legally"* cause they're not allowed to make that call cause of the second amendment
    1
  740.  @dwarfzerker8456  it wouldn't be a machinegun anyway if you have to keep manually cranking it but the corrupt government will consider it that or at least say it's that to make their stupid followers want to "ban" it
    1
  741.  @corneliuspalahniuk345  wow you're stupid no one can "ban" any weapon or weapon related thing cause of the second amendment but they will enforce the fake "laws" as if theyre real if we dont use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that also it was just bumpfire stocks i'm pretty sure but either way it's unconstitutonal therefore not a real law
    1
  742.  @claytonatkinson865  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  743.  @buddylee83  in reality they're not allowed to make any of those calls cause of the second amendment but they do enforce the so called "laws" like theyre real cause we do t actually use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  744.  @corneliuspalahniuk345  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  745.  @buddylee83  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  746.  @corneliuspalahniuk345  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  747.  @noticedgamer9266  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  748.  @StrawberryShmello  wow😒🤦🏻‍♂️😑
    1
  749.  @thomasloks  you can if you don't get caught or will fight physically to keep your rights like you should and how the second amendment intends so you don't go to jail for not complying with their stupid so called "laws"
    1
  750.  @michelguevara151  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  751.  @someguy3766  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  752.  @richardlea818  wow😒🤦🏻‍♂️😑
    1
  753.  @someguy3766  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  754.  @richardlea818  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  755.  @richardlea818  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  756.  @itsmannertime  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  757.  @CL-vz6ch  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  758.  @blacktemplar9499  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  759.  @markfergerson2145  its still good to have really long range weapons or remote controlled ones the less human casulties for your side the better and being able to be farther away allows that easier its not "planning for the last or war before the last" you wouldnt be very good at planning or preparing for a war or whatever
    1
  760.  @robertscriven602  wow😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  761.  @gaptaxi  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  762. Uboa Noticed You it’s just an idiotic unfunny joke
    1
  763. Adam no there’s a lot of people in other countries that can
    1
  764.  @Likexner  its way past that time
    1
  765.  @Likexner  😑🤦🏻‍♂️😒
    1
  766.  @Likexner  wow😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  767. strider04 thanks for understanding you sound like a cool person
    1
  768. Shehryar Khan if you mean by the government when you say terrorists then yes also probly the ones outside the government that they call terrorists too but governments all over the world that are corrupt might as well just be well funded well armed terrorists at this point cause we just let them take over and dont fight physically like the whole point of the second amendment is to fight physically with any weapon we please but people have been brainwashed into believing the government is there only for good things and that we couldnt fight them even if we wanted to or had the means or that we still have a say with voting when we dont etc
    1
  769. Oni Tora i didnt say "real muslims" i said there are ones that dont go by that part
    1
  770. The legendary Klobb RIP your brain
    1
  771. Andrew Cox i dont know how many tried but it doesnt really matter how many have tried because of what you just said you more than likely could if you asked around enough or maybe not even that much cause if no one else hears then no one else knows so why wouldnt they do it? also they could make money from it so thats easy money
    1
  772. Jean Roch who cares how its pronounced it sounds cooler than "the old firepower"
    1
  773. The Peoples Republic Of Disney someone made a prototype bullpup double barrel its on forgotten weapons thats pretty cool to me
    1
  774. only if youre an idiot that says that kinda crap or believes that kinda crap in reality no
    1
  775. fake name merriam websters wrong theres only a magazine and a clip theyre definately not interchangeable
    1
  776.  @MrDgwphotos  it is very fun ive shot two machine guns in my life a .50 bmg browning like this one i dont remember if it was the heavy barrel version or whatever but i shot one and a thompson but the fun isnt why we have them its to help fight against tyrannical "laws" that the government tries to "pass" that goes against the constitution
    1
  777. Jason Irwin magazine* a clip is in an m1 garand or other clip fed weapons or stripper clips to quick load a bolt action or other stripper clip loading guns
    1
  778. Anthony Something not even that gun is that slow on full auto he was semiauto speed firing for sure
    1
  779. xTFLogical Ohio i know thats what i said
    1
  780. in war functionality and durability are higher priorities comfort is definately the last thing they worry about more back then than now though they throw that factor in nowadays and reliability and functionality and durability
    1
  781. Jeramy Whitwell no*
    1
  782. Prjndigo a marlin is a tube fed gun not mag fed
    1
  783. Peter North glock compatibility isnt even new 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  784. whittney shackleburst those are the same as today
    1
  785. Outside the Target Demographic not really its a 22lr glocks have alot more and bigger calibers than just .22
    1
  786. Willy JF thats not a bad thing if the game actually tells you the real information 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  787. Bashful Bones no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  788. Ben Simmons no just no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  789. Sergeant Marcus Stacker no🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  790. wow
    1
  791. @josh fritz  the idiots are the ones that are their followers the ones that are "in office" know exactly what theyre doing
    1
  792. @manitoba2445  wow😒🤦🏻‍♂️😑
    1
  793. @notabagel  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  794. @Matthias Knutzen  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  795. @Logan 999999999999999  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  796. @Harold Ellis  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  797. @Jake Garrett  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  798. @Ezekiel Johnson  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  799. @manitoba2445  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  800. @B. Santos  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  801. @Gaming Gaming  depends what he meant by "workers"
    1
  802.  @dwi2921  wow🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  803. have someone engrave it then or do it yourself it wouldnt be hard
    1
  804. Ja Kooistra put it on whatever you want cause this is america
    1
  805. who cares how people pronounce it its the same word
    1
  806.  @Oscar-jp4wl  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  807.  @stickiedmin6508  wow😑🤦🏻‍♂️😒
    1
  808.  @stickiedmin6508  what you said🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  809.  @stickiedmin6508  i dont have to explain anything and its not "sulky and demure" 😑🤦🏻‍♂️😒 or snarking
    1
  810.  @stickiedmin6508  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒just forget it
    1
  811.  @patrikpoczkodi1923  im sure he does or he probly wouldnt be offended by jokes about it cause thats not a good thing to joke about
    1
  812.  @grim8288  wow😒😑🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  813.  @JBallsMcLongcock  thats not why most people use them they use them cause they dont want to go by the "sbr" "laws" and dont want to fight back physically like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  814.  @Rudofaux  yeah youre the one that dodnt read it or read it fully bud the second half says "the right of THE PEOPLE (not people in a militia or just government people kust the people) to keep(own) and bear (Use against tyranny cause of the first half about preserving the state of being free) "ARMS" shall not be infringed." period. not "shall not be infringed unless_____" or until____" etc like that to make it changeable in any way or for any reason etc like that but if we dont use it that way to fogjt back physically against tyranny then its pointless to say we have it at all cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  815.  @ericschumacher5189  also like you said the militia means everyone cause it says after "the people" and "arms" and "shall not be infringed." (infringed means limited) so theres not supposed to be any limits on what we can and cant own or use in any way other than the pnbiois like murder or robbing someone or raping someone etc thats bad like that
    1
  816.  @DB-yj3qc  and it doesnt worl if we dont use it the way its intended mainly the second amendment cause it protects all pyther amendments if we use it as intended to fight back physically against tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  817.  @Rudofaux  youre the one who doesnt understand what it means you only stated the first half and ignored the second half where it says "the right (cant be taken away dor any reason or in any way etc like that) of the people (not specific people so everyone) to keep (own) and bear use against tyranny as stated in the first half of the second amendment)"arms" (weapons and not just certain ones or with certain ammos or accessories etc like that) shall not be infringed." (infringed means limited) period. not "shall not be infringed unless_____" or until____" or anything else like that to make it changeable in any way or for any reason etc like that
    1
  818.  @sundoga4961  wow😑😒🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  819.  @sundoga4961  its not a workaroind for a law cause the "laws" arent real cause of the second amendment whoch is actually a law and can never be changed in reality cause of the way its worded with saying "shall not be infringed." (infringed means limited) at the end which means it cant be changed in any way pr any reason etc like that but if we dont use it as intended to fight back physically against the tyranny then its useless to say we have it at all cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
    1
  820.  @magnusskipton7067  theres no catch cause none of the "laws" are actual laws cause of the second amendment
    1
  821.  @bluespork3248  also noone in the government can actually write any "laws" restricting oir weapons for any reason or in any way etc like that cause the second amendment says "sahll not be infringed." but if we sont use it as intended to fight back physically against the tyranny then its pointless to say we have it at all cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talkkng to them or voting etc like that
    1
  822.  @TheFanatical1  no we havent given that to them and we couldnt even if we wanted to thats not hpw the second amendment works nopne can change it no matter what the way its worded so no they dont have that authority at all
    1
  823.  @TheFanatical1  no they arent at all
    1
  824.  @Libertarian_Neighbor  people who know better: no we're not and we'll fight physically like the second amendment intends
    1
  825.  @lowkey1969  its not a stock anyway stocks dont have straps that allow you to stabalize the gun to aim and yes you an shoulder them but it doesnt make that a stock cause there is a physical difference i could put a shovel handle on to use as a stock but it still doesnt make it a stock its still a shovel handle at the end of the day just being used different
    1
  826.  @TheFanatical1  sometimes they do but not near often enough thats why the second amendment exists so the people that are willing that are outside the corrupt government can fight back physically cause a corrupt government doesnt self regulate
    1
  827. @Mike what?
    1
  828.  @beargillium2369  they either know what they say is bullcrap and dont care or are just stupid and dont know what theyre talking about at all
    1
  829.  @doctordeath4047  you cant abplosh the atf cause it shouldnt exist in the first olace and theres no "loopholes" in the "laws" cause those "laws" dont exist in reality cause of the second amendment the second amendment was intended to fight back physically against tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that so until we use it as intended that way then jothing will change for the better cause tyrants will never stop unless forced to
    1
  830.  @ao6364  they say every weapon is an "assault weapon" its just a buzz word to get their stupid followers on board with "banning" them and its working cause the smart people think theyre stupid when theyre not they know exactly what theyre doing its to make us not think theyre confident enough to know what theyre doing so we wont fight back physically like the second amendment intends cause they know theyll lose of we do use it as intended to fight back physically
    1
  831.  @8FtCactus  its not open to interpretation the "shall not be infringed." part means it cant be changed in any way or cor any reason and its there to be able to fight tyranny physically since tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking ro them etc like that
    1
  832.  @nutbastard  also it says what the people should do in case of a tyrannical government or them trying to become tyrannical like we've been allowing them to be and become more slowly but surely thats the second amendment is so we can fight back physically against it but if we dont use it that way then its pointless to say we have it or any other rights cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
    1
  833. Salazzar Sinus broomhandle is a different name for a c96 mauser
    1
  834. @anOKlamp wow
    1
  835. if you go by the "laws" that make it that way if you make it yourself then you could make it yourself alot cheaper
    1
  836. Pijawek 2-300 dollars wont even get you a semiauto one of any kind
    1
  837. Dirtyd23 if you go by that logic then yeah but if everyone went by whats actually legal (which would be people could make new ones and its legal without any kind of government permission like it really is then people could buy them for about what youd buy a semiauto clone for)
    1
  838. Michael the thing about that is cause of the second amendment its actually completely legal without anything the corrupt government says you need to make it that way and regaurdless of whether the corrupt police/focernment/military will enforce it as if it were the actual law
    1
  839. Black Acid Gaming if you go by the so called "laws" they "passed" then yeah if you dont then you can make your own and pay a ton less
    1
  840. kitemanmusic no just no🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  841. this one isnt illegal if youre not in a place like california or any leftist run state
    1