Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Light Fifty: the Barrett M82A1" video.

  1. also atf completely bullcrap determination: "guns arent guns if theyre blackpowder only and cant readily be converted to shoot smokeless powder"
    1
  2. TheNinjaDC they dont actually care whats more dangerous for the people shooting them theyre concerned about themselves cause people having machineguns are harder to control/fight against which is the whole reason we have the second amendment
    1
  3. ahayesm the atf is a group of idiots that think they can tell you what and how you can and cant own guns/weapons "legally" when the second amendment literally says theyre not allowed to
    1
  4. SAM BRICKELL you mean they dont want people having it cause its harder to control people who are armed with everything they should be able to own which is literally any weapon we please without any restiriction and its even written in our constitution which is the guidlelines for how we make laws here and the second amendment where it says the right of the people to KEEP AND BEAR "ARMS" (weapons not specified weapons or just firearms and isnt short for firearms) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (limited) period no ifs ands or buts to change its meaning
    1
  5. Gravyon if you do it "legally" you have to have a license to own/make new production machineguns if its after may 6th 1986 according to the feds when its not even real "laws" cause of the second amendment which doesnt allow for any limitations in any way
    1
  6. Michaela Bedonie and if its made after may 6th 1986 you have to have a license to own/produce it and a tax stamp to do it "legally" according to the feds and the license is like 500 dollars a year or something like that
    1
  7. l337pwnage not really they can and will get away with banning them all they just have been doing it slowly and will get away with it as long as we let them keep enforcing unconstitutional "laws"
    1
  8. Jon Smith 50 bmg could go through about three people or more with one round yeah the glock would have more ammo but would be way less accurate and not penetrate one person but all of this doesnt even matter cause a criminal willing to kill that many people is obviously going to use whatever they please and get it in any way they please the way some people argue we shouldnt have these things makes it seem like they think criminals will follow any "law" they "pass" that only restricts the peoples rights who will go by those so called "laws"
    1
  9. I’m crying in a corner While i count my money in the feds eyes and people who believe what they say not the actual law the second amendment expressly states it isnt illegal and never will be
    1
  10. Nunya Bidness but imagine if the feds allowed us to have it to shoot back with if its supposedly more dangerous in their eyes itd be more dangerous for the would be mass shooter too so that logic doesnt really work in their favor to argue with and actually no logic they try to argue with helps them for the simple fact of the second amendment that says (and im paraphrasing but) the right of the people to keep and bear "arms" (weapons bot just certain kinds) shall not be infringed. (limited) period no ifs ands or buts about it and also in almost every amendment if not every amendment it says the powers not given here in this document are reserved to the states or to the people so the feds actually arent allowed to regulate our weapons in any way what we can and cant own or how we can and cant own them etc
    1
  11. shadowrundas pees? and why would they try to shoot themselves with a full auto glock? that makes no sense people who are suicidal will usually use whatever is around to kill themselves not just look for a certain thing or if they cant find it just say "oh well guess i wont kill myself" just like people who are willing to be mass shooters or mass killers arent gonna go by the "laws" and say "oh well cant legally buy a gun or bombs or whatever theyd kill the people with guess ill just go back home"
    1
  12. CMDR Turtle they should just leave you alone anyway they only have the power we allow them to have to be honest the second amendment only works like it supposed to if the people keep them in check like we're supposed to it says the right of the people not the right of the government to keep and bear arms (weapons and bot certain weapons thats why its worded that way) shall not be infringed (limited) period no is ands or buts about it) and use them to enslave us cause we dont have any weapons if we keep them in check it works if we dont then its just words on a piece of paper written a long time ago
    1
  13. unfa its not about concelaing it or how fast it can shoot even to them its all about control over the people think if we had that to defend ourselves with the damge and surprise factor logic doesnt make sense if the people have that much power or more to fight back with and do you think a mass shooter really cares about concealing it or surprising them when they think theyre unarmed? that makes no sense either they dont care who sees them if theyre hust gonna be killing everyone in sight that they can also there was a mass shooting on a college campus with a bolt action rifle and he was doing it sniper style from a bell tower so i dont think it really matters about concealability or sneak attacks that much or how fast the gun can fire etc all the atf/governmebts logic is bullcrap deceptions they dont consider black powder only and not convertable to smokeless power guns to be firearms(guns) lol 😂 so theyre basically saying "guns arent guns if theyre black powder only" how stupid does that sound to you?
    1
  14. super viggo bros you know what else the atf considers a machinegun? anything that fires more than one shot with one pull of the trigger thatd make a double barrel a machinegun if it shot both barrels at once theyre decieving people into believing things are somethingn they arent so they can ban it so they keep redefining it so they can ban more and more
    1
  15. No Body no crap people are (stupidly) arguing that the full auto glock is more dangerous cause its more concealable and is full auto so it can cause more damage faster than a semiauto when a barrett could probly go through three or more people with one shot and you could be two miles away and hot someone with it tell me how the glock would be more concealable when you couldnt even shoot someone near that far away with it or near that accurately lol 😂
    1
  16. Karvast not only that a .50 bmg is also concealable in the fact you could shoot someone from 2 miles away and itd still be able to go through about three or more people and a glock youd have to be right in the group of people youd want to shoot yes it may be full auto and you can spray and pray but think about if we had the same weapon or even more to defend ourselves with (the full auto glock) if theyre that close we could use that same weapon against them and itd be just as dangerous for the would be mass shooter as it was for us and rhey go for places that they think will be unarmed imagine if their "laws" said it required everyone to be armed theyd either think twice or get wrecked after the first shot they fired or if they were seen before they could shoot cause theyd be filled full of holes feom everyone there
    1
  17. Nicolas Preciado i hope youre being sarcastic but even so thats not something to joke about these idiots dont know crap that want to legislate something they expressly arent allowed to
    1
  18. Anzac-A1 its not unconcealable at all you could hust shoot them from about two miles away with a .50 bmg id like to see you do that with a full auto glock lol and the .50 bmg would still go through about three people with one shot glocks cant do that even at close range yeah if youre close up it can do alot of damage to alot of people reallt fast but if the people had that same or more firepower like we should theyd get wrecked before they could get a second shot off cause so many people would be armed and would be able to actually do something about it instead of not being able to do anything at all but run and hope to not die or get shot they choose places they think are safest so they can kill the most people like places that have "gun free zone" signs thats just an invitation for people that are crazy to go shoot the place up theyre easy targets and not threats to them cause they arent able to shoot back
    1
  19. skinnypimp riminals dont beed a license either they just buy it off the black market for a little cash and walk away with it they dont care about the stupid license or anything they say you need (even good civilians dont need it but they wont fight the unconstitutional government so we still go by them for fear of jailtime or death)
    1
  20. Dank memes i hope you dont mean like in a videogame and a barrett not being concealable is bullcrap too you can be like two miles away and kill someone with it and its still go through like theee people with one shot the full auto glock cant do that im sure
    1
  21. Dank memes or weapon that we please with no restrictions cause of the second amendment
    1
  22. I’m crying in a corner While i count my money uhh the mod? what're you talking about?
    1
  23. TGG yeah no the barrett not being concealable is a load of crap you could shppt someone about 2 miles away and itd probly still go through three or more people with a full auto glock youd have to be right up on people yeah it may be full auto but imagine if every responsible adult was was armed with that same firepower or more the shooter wouldnt even go there nore yhan likely cause of all the possible resistance to him with a barrett they wouldnt be able to fire back on him cause hed be so far away they wouldnt be able to find him
    1
  24. TheNinjaDC youre a complete idiot the people who argue for wanting to be able to have these things are way more careful and dont do that stupid crap like that
    1
  25. Gravyon criminals dont care about what they say you need though so doesnt make it any harder to get to them and a barrett is more concealable if you think aboit its capability to be able to kill someone at 2 miles then still probly go through three more people even at that range
    1
  26. Carter Swinton do you know you can kill someone from two miles away with a barrett and itd still have the energy to go through about three more people? and they wouldnt be able to find you for being so far away and you wouldnt have to worry about shooting fast or reloading fast for that fact or have a big magazineor concealing it or any of that nonsense and there was mass shooting with a bolt action rifle from a bell tower at a college campus sniper style so none of that makes any sense to try to argue against the second amendment and another thing that really doesnt make sense is if we had the same firepower as that person itd be just as dangerous to the shooter as it is for the people hed be trying to shoot why do you think most if not all shooting happen in places that have signs that say "no weapons allowed" or "gun free zone" its because thats where theu think there wont be any resistance so they can kill as many people as possible
    1
  27. SpyerSecol 001 doesnt really matter hpw many mass shootings any gun has been used for or any reason they can act like they can come up with to ban it they arent allowef to ban anything for is to own for any reason the only reason we go by their so called "laws" is cause we're too afraid to fight back or dont want to go to jail or die for not doing what they say
    1
  28. MARSHALL Amp probibited in the minds of the atf/federal government or any government that believes they are and in the minds of those who believe what those governments say* the second amendment expressly states they arent allowed to ban/restrict them for ownership in any way for any reason
    1
  29. Scott Keegan a glock 18 cant kill 3 or maybe more people with one shot from two miles away concealablity doesnt mean crap once you open up with a full auto glock with a barrett you wouldnt be seen at all and wouldnt have to worr about having a big magazine or having to shoot fast or concealing it or any of the other bullcrap they day makes it "more dangerous" than a barrett
    1
  30. Wild Bill the "bans" etc that "restrict" civilian sales are complete and udder bullcrap and are null and void the only reason anyone goes by them is for fear of jailtime or death and dont want to fight for the second amendment if we fought back in the days where we still could buy military grade hardware from a hardware store without a background check we wouldnt be in the mess we're in right now and we actually shouldnt be anyway cause the second amendment expressly states they arent allowed to ban/regulate in anyway for any reason any type of weapon
    1
  31. Gibbelblonk obviously you dont know what that "big rifle" is capable of you could shoot someone from 2 miles away and still go through about three or more people after that and youd pretty much be invincible cause they wouldnt be able to find you a grenade blows up once and you have to be so close youd get wrecked after the first one is thrown if every responsible adult was armed with the same or better weapons that they have
    1
  32. Jon Smith one bullet of a barret is more dangerous cause you can fire it from 2 miles away and go through probly three or more people with that one bullet even at that range
    1
  33. Jon Smith i always laugh when i hear people talking about how easy or expensive something is to get for "regular" ""law" abiding""people yeah it is hard and expensive but for a criminal whos willing to kill people they can steal it or make one themselves or buy it from other people who dont care about the "laws" and only care about the money in their pockets they get from selling it to said person
    1
  34. Jon Smith the death of our second amendment rights is cause we dont physically fight the people who enforce unconstitutional "laws" for fear of death or jailtime
    1
  35. Kingrhem school shooters dont buy their guns they steal them cause they dont care about the "laws" they "pass"
    1
  36. Dylan Cook thats what they want you to believe just like how they want you to believe that all the so called "laws" that they "pass" have to be followed when the constitution literally says they are unlawful laws
    1
  37.  @sntslilhlpr6601  🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  38.  @northernu.s.a3995  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  39.  @TheFirstCurse1  wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1