Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Weapons as Political Protest: P.A. Luty's Submachine Gun" video.

  1. Monotech2.0 you dont have to find them thats the point luty was making stuff from a hardware store can make a working smg
    14
  2. oneandy2 so its not the problem with him its the problem with the government
    8
  3. Davis Tuck or peoples imaginations especially when it comes to homemade weapons manufacture anything can be weaponized even an atom split one and its a huge explosion "shrugs"
    4
  4. Andrew Cox does it really matter? literally anything can be weaponized in some way is the point
    4
  5. Monotech2.0 there arent less to be honest the cops dont even try cause they know there are too many despite the laws in place making it illegal
    3
  6. Monotech2.0 no just no
    3
  7. EB video wow no one cares grammar nazi 😂
    1
  8. Ethan Lamoureux yeah and people driving cars can hurt and kill people too but you dont hear anyone trying to ban cars for that reason "because thats not what they were designed for" give me a break things can be used for more than the purpose they were intended for and are used for different purposes the person using them gives them thwir purpose not "what they were intended to do"
    1
  9. Damian thats not even the point they dont care what can and cant be done with them they just want control over wveryone in every way and they cant do that as long as youre armed
    1
  10. ShoesAndStuff what does the population have to do with anything? nothing thats what
    1
  11. ShoesAndStuff or alot of other stuff they dont think they should ban "because they arent solely made to kill" yeah they really think that way it doesnt mattee what it was intended for it depends on what the person who uses it uses it for
    1
  12. Ethan Lamoureux and all kinds of other crap that "wasnt intended for killing/violence like cars or acid etc
    1
  13. Ethan Lamoureux also criminals dont follow "laws" so you know theyre no less likely to be shot than anyone else just cause they have "laws" that say theyre not allowed to do something also they got way worse things than just shootings they got bombings, acid attacks, and running over people etc
    1
  14. Nagow_ nah you arent safer you got way worse stuff and just having "laws" that say people cant do certain things doesnt mean it wont happen
    1
  15. Frank McGovern no "laws" dont guarantee that it wont happen cause CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW "LAWS"
    1
  16. Stale Bagelz yeah cause takimg away their defenses against all the threats we face isnt the worst of it all if you take that away they can do all those worse things you mentioned if not they cant cause the people would have military grade weapons to fight back against them so no we arent "just ignoring all the other stuff"
    1
  17. Wolfang cutthroat youre an idiot if we actually went by the second amendment we wouldnt "only have rifles" like you say wed have the same tech as they do and tech isnt the only factor or doesnt always gaurantee victory or superiority
    1
  18. John Smith yeah i think you got your parties mixed up bud conservatives dont want all this stupid crap that does no good but for criminals who DONT FOLLOW THE "LAWS"
    1
  19. Frank McGovern wow youre a complete idiot
    1
  20. Colin Cleveland still yall we still got way more guns than youll ever have again unarmed nations are the ones who have mass genocides cause they have nothing to fight back with learn from history bud look at all the countries that had their weapons taken from them then got slaughtered by their own "government"
    1
  21. James Ricker youre an idiot read and understand what the second amendment says and means then cone back to this conversation we should have everything the military has for that very purpose and even if we dont the tech and weapons doesnt gaurantee a victory for them
    1
  22. Ethan Lamoureux people that want to do all the evil stuff dont even go by the numbers they just make up bullcrap for gullible enough people to believe and go with without question cause they dont know any better
    1
  23. Jonathan Tricoli wow just wow -_-
    1
  24. Fin it is a totalitarian government or some other kind thats bad whatwver you want to call it it isnt a constitutional one thats for sure and unconstitutional "laws" arent lawful or real laws but we wont use our second amendment rights to keep them in check so its pointless if we dont use it to have it but people dont see it that way and are too scared of jailtime or death to come together and fight for it
    1
  25. Dan Cotton not the usa idiot the government that we have now thats tyrannical and so unconstitutional its unbelievable unconstitional "laws" are unlawful thats the whole point of the constitution but if we dont fight for it then we might as well not have it
    1
  26. Boris Buliak nah they wont ban cars cause "they werent designed solely to kill" like guns and knives etc (being totally serious cause theyre really that stupid)
    1
  27. H7 pubgm grammar nazi owned more like it the one saying all he overthrew was grammar no one cares at all about if someone doesnt spell perfect
    1
  28. Andrew Cox i dont know how many tried but it doesnt really matter how many have tried because of what you just said you more than likely could if you asked around enough or maybe not even that much cause if no one else hears then no one else knows so why wouldnt they do it? also they could make money from it so thats easy money
    1