Comments by "ALLHEART" (@ALLHEART_) on "Popper, Soros and the Open Society" video.
-
35:24 It's not entirely accurate to say Plato wasn't very influential in the Middle Ages. 1) Plato was the teacher of Aristotle, and there is plenty of Plato in Aristotle (and in Thomas Aquinas, for that matter), 2) the Isogogue, a widely read introduction to Aristotle's categories at the time, was a commentary by Porphyry, a Neoplatonist from late antiquity (this also illustrates how Neoplatonist philosophers saw Plato and Aristotle as largely saying complementary things, rather than contrary things). This contributed to the people of the Middle Ages understanding Aristotle through a Neoplatonic lense/framework. 3) The lack of access to the complete works of Plato in the Middle Ages can only be really true of the Latin West. The Eastern Roman Empire continued to have full access to all of Plato (and Aristotle, and all the rest), in the original language, throughout the Middle Ages. 4) What little Plato the Latin West did have access to was highly influential throughout the period. 5) St. Dionysius the Areopagite was widely read in the Latin West and the Roman East, and his thought shares many commonalities with Neoplatonism.
The Middle Ages were highly influenced by Plato.
35
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1