Comments by "Niall O\x27Neill" (@nialloneill5097) on "'Boris doesn't have a good relationship with the truth!' | Former Tory MP Jerry Hayes on partygate" video.

Maybe where he comes from two negatives make a positive, so to lie about lying means you spoke the truth??? And did he do it recklessly? Some liars lie with great aplomb, and are trained from an early age in private schools to articulate their lies in such a way, as they are not noticeable, like a well-trained driver, particularly since these liars are also brainwashed to imagine that these lies are in fact the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, which is why they end up working in govt, or the legal system, often charged with making liars of honest folk. Now if he's a compulsive liar he may be able to get off with it, on the notion he did not preconceive his lies, or he has psychiatric issues, which I am sure could be easily backed up by those other group of liars called psychiatrists, who are ever glad to brandish anyone with the label of being a liar and narcissistic mummy's boy with a personality disorder to justify the huge wages and enormous kudos they receive within the mental health system. They may then exonerate him by stating that his lies are all down to the effects on his psyche from his formal upbringing and education from an early age around systematic liars who operate prevalently in the arenas of politics, public schools, and high finance. Thus, it all comes down to his motives on one hand. On the other hand, reckless to my mind constitutes the notion that akin to a reckless driver, you are a danger to those around you, so regardless of the motives, you drove or acted dangerously, and were a risk to others. Thus, whether you are a political liar, serial liar, compulsive liar, a retarded lair, a street liar, a crooked liar, or well, just a liar, you lied, and just these lies were a danger to external sources, perhaps even the governance of the House of Commons, and people of the UK, whereby by misleading the nation, he could be found to be a traitor to our democratic process of free speech (which tes, includes the freedom to lie, as long it is not reckless lying), and sovereign nation, and should be therefore hung, drawn and quartered, and his head placed next to Mr Wallace near the Tower of London, where people can throw their tomatoes at him, unless they belong to the Tory group of compulsive liars, who could then sing renditions of 'well, he's actually a jolly good fellow, and so say all of us.' Note I do not use the word freely, in relation to throwing, as this sport could be taxed, like all goods and activities in the UK, and the monies used to repatriate the nation with some of the monies that have been stolen from them by successive Tory govts, and also to set up a Ministry of Truth in which all our politicians, particularly the Tory ones, could be exorcised, so they finally come to know what it is to be truthful, and thereby become true servants of their people. Thus, this could be a turning point in the history of this once great and proud nation? Or it could all turn out to be a lie, and it wouldn't be the first time, would it???
1