Comments by "Vladimir Bogorad" (@vlbogorad) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
Why won't an Arab-Palestinian state be created in the West Bank? Firstly, the Arabs themselves, when they talk about this, are in no particular hurry. They like their status as unfortunate people dependent on the whole world, especially their leaders, who receive and distribute this help. As for Israel, it did not recapture the West Bank from the global Arab world represented by Jordan in 1967 in order to create a springboard on this territory for another attack on itself. Israel has already repelled attacks in four major wars against it and does not want a fifth invasion to begin from there. Current events indicate that the Arabs need the West Bank for such a bridgehead. Even without yet having their own state, the Palestinian Arabs have already attacked Israel. What will happen if they have a state and an army equipped with the entire Arab world? They are not and will never agree to create a peace-loving state friendly to Israel. Because they do not recognize Israel’s right to exist. It is not the fault of the Jews that an Arab state in Palestine did not work out. Immediately after the UN decision on two states, everyone in the Arab League fainted, shouted “there will be no Jewish state,” declared war on the newly born little Israel on behalf of their 100 million Arabs, and attacked Israel en masse. Nobody thought about the Palestinian Arabs, and when the world Arabs ended up in 1948 with the West Bank of Palestine, instead of creating an Arab-Palestinian state there, as was proposed at the UN, this piece was seized by Jordan. The country kept it under its ass until 1967, when they again unsuccessfully attacked Israel. Note that Jordanian and Palestinian Arabs are one and the same, just like residents of the two neighboring regions, ut Jordan is not eager to include the Palestinins brothers again, they are necessary to be an eternal danger to israel..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
With all due respect to President Trump, he clearly lacks education on Russia-Ukraine matters. I don’t know what kind of advisers he has on these issues, but some of his statements are simply baffling. For example, for those who live there, it sounds crazy that the USSR, which being covered in blood, having lost most of its European territory, “helped” America win the World War II, America, on whose soil no German soldier even set foot. He does not understand what motivates Putin, because he does not understand what Kharkov, Odessa or Kyiv are for the "Great-Russia imperialist," which, of course, does not justify the war started by this war criminal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
10 причин, по которым в арабо-израильском конфликте
я - за Израиль:
1. В борьбе пьющих с непьющими я занимаю сторону пьющих.
2. Мне больше нравятся режимы, при которых лидера можно посадить, чем те, при которых лидера можно только убить.
3. Мне гораздо симпатичнее те, кто молится стоя, а не раком.
4. Я предпочитаю женщин в военной форме женщинам в черных мешках.
5. Я не хочу, чтобы люди, поднимающиеся каждое утро под вопли муэдзина, победили людей, умеющих заводить будильник.
6. Мне гораздо симпатичнее те, кто, узнав о похождениях дочери, хватаются не за нож, а за сердце.
7. Мне кажется более правильным платить много денег за то, чтобы расстаться с женой, чем за то, чтобы покупать жен.
8. Мне однозначно понятнее люди, которые сразу хоронят своих убитых детей, а не тычут их трупами в телекамеры.
9. У меня вызывает больше уважения общество, отдающее за своего пленного несколько сотен врагов, чем то, в котором своего узника ценят менее, чем в одну тысячную вражеского.
10. Я хочу жить в мире, где не убивают женщин и детей.
А уж если это случается, то пусть уж лучше военная прокуратура раздает пилюли, а не ликующая толпа - конфеты.
Дополнительный пункт:
Я на стороне того народа, который любит анекдоты о себе,
и ставлю его выше тех народов, которые из-за анекдота о себе или карикатуры готовы убивать.
1
-
You just look at how he frightened this fucking Europe. Where are the units of volunteers - Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, didn't you yell at 56 and 68 "For ours and your freedom"? Where are the forest brothers from Lithuania? Are you afraid of this vile Stalin's last from the Kremlin? If you don't connect and act now, this bastard will come to you soon. Then you will be sorry that did not stop him near Kiev.
Bы только посмотрите, как он напугал эту сраную Европу, где отряды добровольцев - поляков, чехов, венгров, не вы ли орали в 56-ом и в 68 "За нашу и вашу свободу? Где лесные братья из Литвы? Неужели испугались этого мерзого сталинского последыша из Кремля? Если не соединитесь и не выступите сейчас, эта сволочь скоро придёт и к вам. Тогда пожелеете, что не остановили его под Киевом.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is a way out of the impasse in Crimea, if bias is discarded. Crimea should belong to both countries. Crimea has never been part of an independent Russian state as it exists today. Crimea belonged to the people inhabiting Russia and Ukraine, when these territories were part of the USSR, and when they were part of the Russian Empire. The current state border between Ukraine and Crimea is the same injustice as if such a border were between Russia and Crimea. In international law, there is the concept of condominium (condominium) - an entity over which two states exercise sovereignty and possession. For example, Pheasant Island, owned by France and Spain, under the Treaty of the Pyrenees in 1659, after the Thirty Years' War. Russia cannot afford to be in international isolation for thirty years. It must move towards a compromise. The whole world sees that Crimea was not rightfully annexed, and this curse cannot hang over Russia forever. Firstly, Crimea was annexed on the basis of an illegal referendum in one region. In the Constitution of every country, including Russia and Ukraine, it is written that the separation of any territory is possible only by popular vote. The whole country. Otherwise, if each region could choose the country to which it would like to join, not a single state would have survived. Ask Putin, if tomorrow they vote on Sakhalin to surrender to Japan, will they let him go? The way he let go of Chechnya. .Secondly, Crimea was annexed in violation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which Russia signed and under which it pledged to respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine in exchange for renunciation of nuclear weapons. In Russia, lackeys on all channels repeat that Russia should not comply with this document, because it has not been ratified by Russia. Lies. The absence of ratification does not exempt Russia from fulfilling its obligations. Article 15 of the Federal Law of the Russian Federation "On International Treaties" dated July 15, 1995 states that ratification is required if it is provided for by the international treaty itself. However, the Budapest Memorandum, according to its text, does not require ratification. On the contrary, at the end of this document it is clearly stated that it comes into force immediately after signing.
1