Comments by "Alain Portant" (@alainportant6412) on "PowerfulJRE"
channel.
-
19
-
16
-
10
-
6
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yikes. NFT bros are going to zero.
And before anyone tries to make the "muh bitcoin blockchain" comparison, here's the main difference between the two things :
Owning 1 Bitcoin means that you own a 0.000005% share in a global distributed network of computers spitting 175 ExaHashes per second.
I'm sure you're familiar with the concept of mining, so you understand that the energy required to mine a Bitcoin costs about the same of what it sells for.
On the other hand, NFTs are ugly pieces of trash that represent nothing, cost nothing to mint and most importantly, are not enforceable property by any stretch of the imagination.
Technically, it's zero. It's not like it solves the DRM problem.
Non fungible coins have been around on the Bitcoin blockchain since 2013, back when they were called Colored coins, the concept was cool but it never took off because people realized what I just said, and since there was only smart money in the industry ( until the 2017 ICO bull run ) people moved on to other concepts.
This is the 2021 NFT bull run, and it's going to zero in the same pathetic way ICOs did. But in a stupider, uglier way, because people are stupider and NFTs are ugly pieces of trash.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
12:53 Yeah, its called "New chronology" , initially developed by Anatoly Fomenko. But frankly his conclusions are sort of wacky and Russian centred.
What seems extremely plausible though, is that most ( if not all ) of the antiquity has been antedated to make it seem way older than it really is, for political purposes. The official chronology doesn't make much sense, frankly.
The key to this chronological problem seems to revolve around the pseudo-antique Roman empire ( which would have been faked by the more recent Roman Republic ) actually taking place during the so called middle ages and onto the renaissance ( which would make it a naissance(birth) rather than a renaissance(rebirth) of pseudo-antique knowledge .
For instance the colosseum wouldn't be 2000 years old, but more likely around 500 ( it doesn't appear on older maps ).
Think of it, there are no original works of Pluto, Socrates, Caesar or anything like that. Only transcriptions made during the so called renaissance 1300-1600 ( which would have been the date of the actual Roman empire)
To make matter worse, the oldest italian family ( The Orsinis ) can only be dated back to the year 1000, as for every European royal families. Nothing before the year 700.
So where did those antique ancestors go ? Well, they likely never existed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1