Comments by "" (@thekidfromcleveland3944) on "Closing Seattle’s autonomous zone" video.

Personally I got nothing against showers. But there are some devoted bathtub people out there that will find that sentence heresy😂😂😂
5
To be fair your city was in such an upheaval that putting it down too quickly and violently might very well have caused them to revolt and completely destroy Seattle. From how I see it, the mayor lost the battle but not the war. 4 blocks is much better than all of them. But I digress. Love your monorail by the way.
4
D well yes. The war was won in fact the city of Seattle still.....you know..... exists. I think we all can agree that we've never seen anything like that before certainly not within my lifetime. That was such a crazy and violitle situation that you almost needed to let it continue so you could see what would happen. Was this the start of something bigger? What would ch?? Be like? And finally just curiosity. What is life in an autonomous state like? Honestly letting it continue at least for a bit let everyone see that life without the institutions we have in place is bad. Very bad. So bad that I don't think anything like ch?? will be attempted again. This situation kinda reminded me of the student and and the teacher. Where a student thinks he knows how to solve a problem better than the teacher. Rather than putting him in his place as a "rebel". The teacher goes ahead and let's him try. In front of all the other students. When he fails and all the students see him fail. Then nobody questions the teacher further. See the parallels?
2
Well then that works in the mayor's favor. Cause if they do take hostages or blow their stack, then she can put it down without fear of losing the rest of the city.
1
@jamesbizs that's true. And that was a pretty stupid of her to say. The phrase in her favor means she can get rid of Chaz chop???? without having to worry about the rest of the inhabitants freaking out and revolting. Remember when ch??? Was first formed the entire city was in upheaval. People were mad, panicked, and didn't trust the local government. If the mayor had put down ch??? Then and there, it may have very well caused a revolt that would have destroyed the city. The crazy people would have interpreted those actions as the city turning on their own. But now enough time has passed. Things are calmer, and ch?? Is failing miserably. It's time for it to come down and everybody knows it. City residents want it to. Now the mayor can take whatever actions needed to accomplish that. And if ch?? Refused to peacefully or took hostages....even better. Now it's a hostage situation and any method used by the mayor to put it down is going be viewed as just by the inhabitants. Liberating the innocent ones and the city from this uh.... failed experiment.
1