Comments by "chaosexists" (@31mAyMgaYanga) on "Russia Launched Surprise OFFENSIVE in Luhansk" video.

  1. its a peculiar situation that z army hasn't give in, considering the fact that they made more failures in their little military operation
    35
  2. z army's game changers - t-14s which they never used because it failed many tests - kinzhal "hypersonic" missile, only to be shot down by patriot missile system 6 times - t-90s are a bunch of iron coffins, 2000 losses - ka-52, many lost, even by their own team, the wagner 🤣 and yet they still can't capitulate ukraine
    15
  3. good story ivan, check your account balance, see if it's enough to put food on your table
    13
  4. the best outcome is when russia leaves ukraine alone
    13
  5. z army lost more trying to take a small city, so this so called offensive of theirs isn't much of a difference
    12
  6. just like z army's failure at kyiv, khariv and kherson. they cope so hard, that they wanted it back
    11
  7. and z army's 3 day operation at kyiv is successful retreat
    7
  8. except for russians
    6
  9. a truth catered to putler's regime
    6
  10. still less than z army tank losses, which is thousands btw. ukraine lost a few
    6
  11. trying too hard to please watniks
    4
  12. they will succeed in their own many losses
    4
  13. not as secret as z army's losses
    3
  14. lovely claims, but no one is going to believe who is a crackpot
    3
  15. i love how ruskies act like this "offensive" is going to be successful when heavily rely on human wave attacks
    3
  16. yes, more of z army's kia
    2
  17. yes trying to take back what they lost miserably, probably going to take years longer that bakhmut
    2
  18. anything that isn't supporting russia is biased, according to you
    2
  19. its easier to tell lies and pass it off as "facts"
    2
  20. still coping hard on z army's loss of kharkiv last year, now they trying hard to take it back
    2
  21.  @stevenwallacebaker9169  neither does russia on how they will take ukraine without taking too much ls
    2
  22.  @arleighburkeclassdestroyer1240  where russians at kyiv?
    2
  23. it is "impressive" territory-wise, but for manpower losses, no, especially if it outweighs the two
    1
  24. he is best at being cringe and supportive of putler's regime
    1
  25.  @danieltucker3506  you probably had measles ir smallpox beforehand, therefore you've lost your moral standards
    1
  26. they're really good at friendly fire too, wished they switched sides tho
    1
  27. don't know what you're smoking, but don't expect someone (except for bots) to take you seriously
    1
  28. useful input, bot. now back to your posts where you belong
    1
  29. like z army's failure at kyiv?
    1
  30.  @sergey3533  they were no negotiations, they lost because z army is so weak, they ran away
    1
  31. if by doing human wave attacks—that's the Z army's signature—they go for it, they will rack up losses, much to ukraine's relief
    1
  32. didn't collapse yet, also russia's military and economy wise is collapsing faster
    1