Comments by "Luiz Devil" (@luizdevil6855) on "This Theory of Everything Could Actually Work: Wolfram’s Hypergraphs" video.

  1.  @patrick_into_the_future  why would you need particles to emerge that way ? aren't particles just some sort of mathematical abstraction anyway ? like waves are ? particles don't exist, as long as you can emulate the mathematics of the fields using hypergraphs, then that should be enough. Fields exist, waves and particles don't exist, they're mere observations of the values of the fields. why are you looking at the ocean and asking in the water molecules where are the waves ? that makes no sense, they're no where because its emergent behavior.
    10
  2. 4:42 there's a way to fix this problem with computation. In reality computation takes time, that creates basically a 1:1 relationship between the speed of information being computed and the size of the objects. Aka, the faster you go, the more cycles you take from the Universe's CPU, the thinner you are going to appear to another observer, space itself becomes distorted because you have different computations happening at different speeds, and the length of something is defined to the time of computation because that's how you calculate how long something is, the amount of time light takes to go from one point to another, that means the amount of cycles it takes, but the amount of cycles remaining to the computation changes. Obviously light always go at the maximum speed, the clock rate of the computer, but the particles that are not mere simple information take time to be changed, thus they will appear smaller. "c" is mere the cycle clock of the Universe, so when you go fast, you basically consume all the cycles, and if you go at the speed of light "c", you basically stop moving and become so thin you disappear, that also solves the problem with singularities.
    5
  3.  @lkjhgdsfuvvthntddegjnvdgj  "physicists should just be humble and contribute work to what already exist" they cannot do that because they don't want to give up locality, which is why physics is stuck for 50 years and all new theories come from computing science and mathematics. they're just wrong and mad about it, they can't seem to evolve beyond what Einstein said. As someone said, they're all models, what matters who said what, as long as the model has predictive power, who cares ? But physicists seem to be stuck in a sort of narcissism, that's why they don't make progress. What I care about all of this is what I can use from the mathematics to engineering so I can actually build real things in the real world, otherwise physics is mere mental masturbation and is useless. That's why I like the simulation hypothesis, it has the chance of being useful to computing in actual computers in a way similar to how the universe works, which makes for more precise models, which makes for better software, which is what I make.
    1
  4. When I read his "A new kind of mathematics" my concepts of mathematics and computing merged and the way I see things was forever changed. We really need to take this to physics.
    1