Comments by "Luiz Devil" (@luizdevil6855) on "Climate Scientists are Very Confused." video.

  1.  @manoo422  I have spotted the crisis. I call it "The Great Urban Heating hypothesis" . Its very logical and simple and matches all of the data (except the stupid ice cores), cities are hot and the more they grow the hotter they get. Just a lot of machines and burning cars and electricity producing a lot of waste heat, and concrete is very good at absorbing and keeping the heat from irradiating as black-body radiation. It has nothing to do directly with CO2, except that burning it creates waste heat in our heat pumps, I mean, ICE engines. CO2 vs heating is more of a correlation than causation. The climate is changing because its cyclical and non-linear, we have the Milankovish cycles. But cities are getting hotter each year because of human activity. So the climate change is human made.
    1
  2. We should stop burning things because that produces heat, and we're over-heating our cities, not to say about the particulate pollution. CO2 is not the real problem, we should stop caring about it so much, it really isn't the problem, just the symptom.
    1
  3. 0:32 that's very CONDESCENDING of you. do you even have any idea how hard is to retrofit entire industries. typical of physicists ... tsc tsc everything is a spherical cow
    1