Comments by "Luiz Devil" (@luizdevil6855) on "A Big Nuclear Bomb Could Fix Climate Change, Physicist Says" video.

  1. So instead of 2% risk, lets have unpredictable unforeseen risks. WHAT A GREAT IDEA !
    13
  2.  @ER_Murrow  "global warming" is not risky and with unpredictable long term consequences, we know precisely the risks, and the consequences. It seems people decided the risks was not worth the costs of fixing shit. Either way the power grid will switch away from oil for more important reason : efficiency. I hate this idea that it is a catastrophe, its pure fear mongering, I wonder if the reason is just to pass the green credits tax.
    1
  3.  @joaosantos-uj9uw  Germans burn coal, Americans mostly burn oil and gas, not good, but not bad. Coal is the absolute worst thing you can burn, its highly pollutant. And I'm talking about real environmental pollution (well, oil is also bad because it leaks sometimes), not CO2, which is fake pollution for activists. That's why we must phase out burning fossil fuels, because they're real dirty, not because of CO2. Probably nothing needs to be done about CO2, just accept the temperature is now +5ºC extra on average, build more nuclear reactors, and life is going to be fine eventually. In a 1000 years the problem solves itself. Humans can survive +5ºC, but they can't survive -5ºC, I think we should not try to do geoengineering, it WILL be used as a weapon. Doing nothing is literally better and has only 2% risk, or at least that's what I read in the investor material from insurance companies that do global insurance, if they think climate change is only 2% risk, who am I to deny that, we can literally just do nothing and pay the price. Literally ! (well, maybe some poor people will pay the price, maybe in africa or something, that's a price we're all willing to pay, right ?)
    1
  4. know what's funny, the blackbody irradiation of Earth is 180 pettawatts and the most solar irradiance is just 90 pettawatts. Its impossible for the planet to overheat, not when a part of the atmosphere that's only 0.038% can reflect infrared back (in fact water also reflects heat back and it much more of a greenhouse gas, but you're not allowed to notice that, its not like it matter either, because its less than 1%, no wait, what did I say ? ). I have a better idea, lets just cover all cities with IRR Fabric, problem solved. No more "urban warming", I mean, global warming. Or maybe we should stop paving over everything with concrete, maybe that would fix the problems, or just move the weather stations far away from all cities (hard thing to do).
    1
  5. Drinking a cup of water solves the climate change, go have a walk in the park. Stop worrying about non-existent problems.
    1