Comments by "Luiz Devil" (@luizdevil6855) on "MGUY Australia" channel.

  1. but then how can you tax their vehicles if they keep driving an old one
    2
  2.  @keepitreal2902  that's how a civil war starts
    1
  3. Electric cars might be useful because they decrease the pollution on cities, which is where people live. Not having particulate in the air near people is better. Even if you still burn oil to power the electric vehicles, the oil burning facility will have filtering tanks for particulate that actually work (unlike the tiny catalytic converters). The problem with pollution isn't the CO2, its the particulate getting into people's lungs, if you burn all the energy required in a big engine, it will be more efficient, produce less pollution and produce it far away from city centers, where it can dissipate can cause less problems. But, with the "climate change" cult, CO2 is a villain, the demon itself. So we create a fake problem instead of solving the real problem caused by the pollution.
    1
  4. they also want to take the guns for your "safety"
    1
  5.  @aeroearth  Public transport only works because of 9-5 office jobs, that goes away, public transport stops working that well because not everyone is going to the same place at the same time all the time. Another thing they're fighting saying that WFH (work from home) doesn't work, when everyone knows the world kept going for 3 years like that, but then the office building owners started losing money because cities were becoming empty, then suddenly WFH started being reversed back.
    1
  6. why do they need heaters ? to heat the batteries so the vehicle can work in the winter ?
    1
  7. The entire idea of CO2 is ridiculous. If they would at least justify that it decreases the pollution in cities because you're not burning and emitting particulate anymore. But its all about the HARMLESS CO2. CO2 isn't a pollutant.
    1
  8.  @simoncrooke1644  that's when the first amendment is useful then
    1