General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
CreeperOnYourHouse
Ed Nash's Military Matters
comments
Comments by "CreeperOnYourHouse" (@CreeperOnYourHouse) on "Ed Nash's Military Matters" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
The first time i saw the F 222 in war thunder, both of its engine nacelles were on fire, giving it the appearance of a jet aircraft. This genuinely had me confused until I saw it unmolested in the hangar several days later. I now call it the br 1.7 jet bomber as a joke to myself.
6
A likely reason this was never used by the germans in a fighter capacity is their focus on being able to fire through the propeller hub.
3
That might be more to do with optimal design for Radial vs inline engines. The Hughes H-1 pretty much defined the ideal design used for high speed radial engine fighter aircraft through WW2. The only one to not follow the design was the P-47.
2
They pause your make after ":612 kilometers" at 7:30 or so made me hope you'd end that with "per second" or "per year".
1
Wonder why they didn't use the Sabre gear train as a reference, would've saved dev time.
1
@lordwintertown8284 A truly powerful demonstration of early jet technology
1
@sergeychmelev5270 it's not that it specifically influenced any specific design, but the specific appearance of how the engine sat on the body with how the streamlining was done behind it was seen repeatedly on almost every ww2 radial engine fighter. It's not the same type of streamlining as on an inline engine.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All