Comments by "Defense Politics Asia (DPA)" (@DefensePoliticsAsia) on "[ Kharkiv Front ] Ukrainian forces captured Lisne, Rus'ka Lozova and Kutuzivka" video.

  1. I always used them dude.... you just never noticed. LOL I use sources from both sides. Only some of the viewers are complaining i'm pro this or pro that~
    8
  2. All the information about losses can be fake. I dont want to mislead people unnecessarily (or myself)
    6
  3. wut? =\ You do know I could have just ignored this entire intel and not report it at all and act as if it never happened? duh~
    4
  4. Thats a different region you are talking about I think... thats the Izyum front~
    3
  5. CONGRATULATIONS! YOU ARE HEREBY CONFERRED THE TITLE OF "THE FIRST OF COMMENTERS, HERO OF THE DPA YOUTUBE CHANNEL"~!!! SLAVA DPANI~!!!
    3
  6. Yeah... I basically live in european or american time zones.... LMAO
    3
  7. Whatever it is - its still a source. Intel can always be invalidated with new information. So dont fret about it too much~
    2
  8. Woohoo~!!
    2
  9. LMAO 🤣
    1
  10. I am neutral. I report whatever intel I get. Thats what I do. It is the viewer that always brand me as pro-russia or pro-ukraine. Personally, I dont really care about pro-who. The war is clearly Russia's to lose from my point of view. Resistance and military aid is only pro-longing the inevitable and the suffering of civilians... Otherwise, it doesnt really matter.
    1
  11. If the source is not accurate, then my reporting will be not accurate. Thus, take my words with a pinch of salt.
    1
  12. I dunno. Just like I dunno if the pro-russian sources are telling the truth. I only report. Then we will wait for more information to corroborate those information later.
    1
  13. I congratulated the twitter account. Their twitter is bigger than mine. They no need "promotion". LOL~
    1
  14. The references are all in the map which is accessible at defensepoliticsasia.com/ukraine Whether a piece of information is from pro-russian or pro-ukrainian is very important. Because it signals how much the viewer should give weight to that piece of information in their own opinion.
    1