Comments by "IKhan" (@7477238) on "Dashcam Lessons" channel.

  1. The first one the cammer handled that well. He didn't escalate it and the caveman line was hilarious.
    524
  2. That first clip is hilarious. Perfect way to screw with someone raging at you. One time some idiot followed me and tried to run me off the road a few times. I ended up driving fast enough to keep distance but slow enough that he could keep up with me and I drove right to a police station. The rager suddenly had somewhere else to be and drove off.
    266
  3. Anyone who uses a gun other than in self defense shouldn't be allowed to own one and just to play it safe they shouldn't be allowed on public streets either. The unfortunate part is a gun is used as an extension of someone's fragile ego these days.
    222
  4. So people are in a rush but when they can finally pass you and be on their way they suddenly have all the time in the world to rage. Air tight logic there...
    208
  5. 4:49 that "thunk" is just the funniest. Whoever designed and built that pole put quality ahead of costs. Good on them.
    103
  6. 1:55 one day he will walk up on the wrong person and it won't end well.
    72
  7. 3:03 that guy in the Benz would be getting a nice can of bear spray to the face. The second you get out of your car to rage you'll get no sympathy from me if you get hurt.
    71
  8. Anyone caught lying to police or insurance about a crash (like in the first clip) should automatically be only eligible for high risk insurance and cop a $1000 charge by Police. People these days seem allergic to taking responsibility.
    55
  9. "Here I am cruising along in my Tesla P100D with midnight silver metallic paint on black synthetic leather interior. I caught a driver driving slow but enough of that let's get back to my Tesla P100D with midnight silver metallic paint on black synthetic leather interior. I paid $95,000 for it which is $90,000 more than you paid for your car and mine has a built in camera. If you didn't know already my car is a Tesla".
    42
  10. With regards to clip 1 I initially was annoyed by his wife but she's got a point. Had the cammer just let the Toyota driver go then he would have had plenty of space to get over. When someone is merging it is up to them to merge safely, not expect people to let them in because that's not the law.
    38
  11. The Karen driving the blue Hyundai is in such a rush that she'll honk like crazy yet suddenly have all the time in the world to be a petty raging asshole? People just suck.
    35
  12. I had a similar incident like clip 3 where some raging jackass kept yelling at and following me for a while because he got offended I didn't let him in when his lane was ending. I eventually and normally drove to a Police station and the second I turned in there he suddenly had somewhere else to be and went away.
    34
  13.  @mikeshogunlee  First off the Benz has to yield as his lane was ending. The pickup driver has the legal right of way. There is no obligation for anyone to let another driver in by definition of law.
    32
  14. Clip 2 was satisfying as hell to see. Cheaters never win.
    29
  15. 6:19 good thing you had a dash cam as the other driver probably would have claimed you rear ended him. That seems like an obvious insurance scam.
    27
  16. 7:26 who parks their vehicle in a live lane of traffic to take a look under the hood?
    26
  17. And your approach is why we have all the problems we have today in society. If nobody is told or shown that they are wrong there will be no improvement. The Odyssey driver's insurance will pay for both vehicles, the cammer can sue the Odyssey's insurance to compensate him for the lost value due to the accident claim and for sure the at fault driver's insurance will be getting a massive hike to offset the costs of the repair. I'd say that's a lesson well taught.
    25
  18.  @georgefloydsinhellwbreonna5330  Regardless it's not her place to tell him right versus wrong, smack his hood or assault him. She's just being a total Karen.
    24
  19. 1:15 I noticed that when liars are called out on their BS they get even more upset but deep down inside they know they're wrong. Hopefully the cammer took the guy to court and submitted the video to insurance so they can either drop the other driver or charge him way more.
    22
  20. Miss the part where the Volvo driver is changing multiple lanes? Not checking their blindspot? The cammer has the legal right of way and has done nothing wrong. Way to victim blame.
    22
  21. I love the second clip. Just let stupid people do themselves in. The sad part is they probably will still somehow think they were in the right.
    22
  22. Especially in the US
    21
  23. 4:11 so move the stalk and turn your damn wipers on. Are people that dependent on these automatic systems on their cars that they refuse to take any manual control over it? These are basic driving techniques, don't depend on tech for those simple things.
    20
  24. 0:29 hang on a minute. The Accord driver is in the wrong there. He's the one blocking the lanes and whoever has all 4 wheels in the lane has the legal right of way. Also, with you being blocked by the Accord why would you agree with anything he did?
    19
  25.  @OngoingFreedom  You sound a little too privileged talking like that. If the Officer was behaving as poorly as he was then what makes you think the department is any better? All of this is going straight to social media, the media and then to the police station. Cover ups like that happen all the time. When it's out in the open then and only then will action be taken either by the Sheriff/Chief or IA.
    19
  26.  @robv5834  Just a matter of fairness. If I wait in the line then why should some entitled asshole be allowed in? I don't get mad, just get even. It's the morons in the other cars that freak out.
    19
  27. I guess the Karen in the first clip thought she was being brake checked. With that being said NOTHING justifies that nonsense on the highway or any roadway. Jokes on her though, sure she got a pic in but the cammer has actual video of it.
    17
  28.  @Lincolntowncoupe  It's not a matter of proving a point. It's a matter of what's right and what's wrong. Cammer is in the right and there are things they can do to make this a no cost scenario which I mentioned above. Also, how is following the law making an emotional decision versus logical? Following the law is the logical way to go. If everyone drives within the law at all times we'd have almost 0 collisions on the road.
    17
  29.  @apfelbasket  You're really reaching to find a reason to hate on the cop. I'd say their relaxed response helped keep the calm in a situation like this.
    16
  30. 6:07 the van and pickup drivers are legends for that. It makes entitled drivers so mad.
    16
  31. Try telling that to some asshole boss who blames the employees for everything. One time there was a major crash on the highway near where I live. The amount of people on the news simply said "I had to call my boss and quit because I knew I was going to be fired for being late". It's a sad thing.
    15
  32. It's always hilarious to me that people are in such a rush yet they suddenly have all the time in the world to rage at someone.
    15
  33. 6:41 Poorly marked accident? People have to be blind not to see that. Nice try at hating on the cops.
    14
  34. 5:35 I bet the cammer explained it differently to his Highway Patrol friend. The trucker has all of his wheels in that lane and therefore controls it. By no means is anyone obligated to let you into the lane they're already established in. Cammer was just butthurt.
    14
  35. Yep. I make it my life's work to not let them back in and basically sit on the highway until they explode. I don't care if our cars hit because it's their bank owned car versus my old car.
    14
  36.  @Lincolntowncoupe  Okay let me run you out of your lane next time and make sure to practice the self righteous nonsense you preach. There is nowhere in the law (I'm going off of the OHTA here in Ontario) that states I need to avoid anything. It says to drive within the law at all times and in this scenario I have the right of way. The Van driver is at fault. Full stop.
    13
  37. Yeah I think that's why she threw her hands up in the air. It was because of the over reaction of the cammer, not because she was entitled.
    12
  38. 0:55 the best thing you can do when someone is raging at you like that is to move up just a bit so they chase you on foot. Then, you stop for a bit so they catch up. Then, move forward again. Rinse and repeat and before you know it the rager is now 80 feet away from their car with their door flung open. They will be so pissed when they walk back to their car.
    12
  39. Why chase the Mustang guy down? Just let him be and he'll do himself in sooner than later. One time some clown in an Escalade cut me and a bunch of other cars off and sped down a rural road. 10 minutes later we all drove past his now wrecked Escalade in the ditch. Let nature sort the stupid ones out.
    11
  40. Oh bullshit they know full well what they're doing. Nobody has taken them to task on it yet that's all. She'll pull up on the wrong person one day and when it goes sour she'll play the victim. IF you treat minimum wage workers like dirt then you are dirt.
    11
  41.  @robv5834  Except I don't get angry about it. I literally get fun out of it because I deny them the ability to be entitled assholes. Their ego send them into a total mess and I can guarantee you they fume about it for the entire day.
    11
  42. 6:55 imagine being so scared of COVID that you decline a rental car that was probably sanitized before being handed off to you. The ignorance and paranoia around a cold is beyond dumb. I had it, felt like a head cold for about a week and I recovered and went on with life the same way you do after a cold or flu.
    11
  43.  @se-kmg355  I would say the person trying to bully their way into the lane just because they have their signal on is the entitled driver. Cammer legally had control of the lane and there is no legal obligation to let someone in. What should he do? Slam on his brakes risking getting rear ended just to let someone in? Nope.
    10
  44. 1:22 cammer that's your own damn fault. There wasn't enough room to change lanes and you think your signal gives right of way. There is no legal obligation for someone to let you in.
    10
  45.  @MaxZomboni  How did she stand up if she eventually gave up and went her way? He was in the right.
    10
  46. When you read traffic laws there is nothing stating the merger has the right of way. As a matter of fact they have to yield so the truck driver is the innocent one here. Drive within the law, not within your feelings
    10
  47.  @StevenPenny  It does not matter whether the cammer saw them or not. The cammer has the legal right of way. Driving has to do with the law otherwise it would be a free for all and the roads/highways would be a lot more deadly. There is NO law stating you have to let someone in. If they're being an entitled ass and hit my car my dash cam will show that and it will be their insurance that pays me out big time. As a matter of fact the way the law is written I could literally crash into someone who took away my right of way even if I could have stopped and I wouldn't be found at fault. Right of way is right of way bar none.
    10
  48.  @zacharyking6171  Businesses don't turn down potential sales for no reason. You probably gave them a hard time. We have ways of dispatching potential trouble customers at our dealership. Get rid of the trouble and make way for more time to help the good ones who are respectful and spend money.
    10
  49. The selfishness lies on the person who is committing the infraction, not the one who has the legal right of way.
    10
  50.  @mashintotters858  He had the right of way. Entitled Benz driver got shut down.
    9
  51. The second you get out of your car to rage at someone the recipient should be automatically allowed to bear spray the rager.
    9
  52.  @StevenPenny  Well trucks can't be maneuvered like a go kart especially when loaded up with up to 80,000lbs. You can take the side of the car driver but legally he did everything wrong not to mention he blocked traffic and proceeded to approach the truck driver in a threatening way.
    9
  53. In the second clip the cammer should have kept stopping and going. Eventually the rager would have been so far from his van it would have been hilarious.
    9
  54.  @theBear89451  Read the law. He has to yield to the person already in the lane. Giving up your legal right of way is stupid. Stop trying to act like some sort of angel, that has NOTHING to do with what happened here.
    9
  55. 3:39 so the guy is underinsured and still has the audacity to lie. I would take him to court just to inconvenience him and make him at the very least pay for a lawyer. Had he been honest I wouldn't do anything and leave it up to insurance but since he wants to lie and be an ass I'll fire back.
    9
  56. I feel for the kid and the dog in the first clip. At the very least he'll hightail it out of the house at 18 and not make the same mistakes Karen did.
    9
  57. 1:43 seems to me American insurance companies are the worst. There is video proof and it took 8 months to settle? Give the name of the insurance company so they can be shamed and boycotted.
    9
  58. 5:50 get you car appraised after the repairs are done. If the insurance claim diminishes the resale value of your car versus a non accident model with similar age/mileage you can submit that claim to the other party's insurance company and they (after some fighting of course) will write you a check for the difference. You can also sue the driver for at least your deductible if you had one. I did just that and got money back. Took a bit of effort though.
    8
  59. 3:53 don't try to play innocent. The Jeep driver may have gotten a little angry but you did cut in front of them.
    8
  60. 6:16 why let him leave when he's the one responsible? He also had the audacity to argue back which means he should get in trouble. Nothing I hate more than someone who can't take responsibility for their actions and if you let people be then why do you have a dash cam?
    8
  61. Well the laws clearly state that the person merging must yield so this is on the Tesla driver and anyone else who commits such a dumb act.
    8
  62.  @DiogenesOfCa  Wrong. The law states that anyone wanting to change lanes must yield all while signaling to show their intent. It doesn't matter that the van's lane is ending or blocked. It's still their job to wait until it's clear to change lanes. Drive within the law. Right of way belongs to the cammer.
    8
  63. I wonder if the vehicle pulled to the left when the cammer slammed on the brake.
    8
  64. A $100 dash cam does a far better than that Tesla cam crap. How is video from the 90s considered good?
    8
  65. Read up on traffic laws. The traffic acts of each state or province clearly states that anyone merging has to yield. There is 0 legal obligation on the cammers in this case, or any driver, to let someone in especially if it mean giving up their legal ROW and potentially getting rear ended via slamming on their brakes to let an entitled driver in.
    8
  66.  @StevenPenny  Even if that's the case the car driver does not have the right of way and there is no legal obligation anyway on the part of the truck driver to let anyone in. What is so hard to understand about that? There is clear proof it's the car driver's fault bar none.
    8
  67. Even when Australians are angry it sounds so pleasant. Greetings from Canada!
    8
  68. 5:51 that's exactly the problem. Police are quick to pull you for doing 5 over the limit but are nowhere in sight to catch the real baddies. 30 minutes to show up for a drunk driver. Great.
    8
  69. 4:02 both of you. You for getting into the turn lane before it officially begun and the sedan driver for not checking blind spot.
    8
  70. 4:12 was a satisfying PIT.
    7
  71.  @StevenPenny  The ONLY thing applying here is legalities. Driving is about following the law.
    7
  72.  @dumbassdriversofdenver9113  Since when does the law have to do with ego? The law clearly states that the one merging has to yield to the drivers already in the lane they wish to go into. Drive within the law. I don't have to let a merger in especially if they're an entitled fool that think I have to give up my right of way and slam on my brakes just to let them in. I risk getting rear ended if I slam on my brakes.
    7
  73.  @Ryan-yu5kt  Or they're driving within the law and doing things right so they get pissed when they see someone do something reckless and get away with it.
    7
  74. Well she did far worse. She needs a little humbling if she wants to laugh at her being dangerous. People get shot for less.
    7
  75.  @donnash5813  Ego? What about the ego of the pickup driver and his wife? They feel like the world has to stop for them. Their actions caused the hold up, not the cammer.
    7
  76.  @legion7478  Just because the law exists doesn't mean they actually enforce it. Also, if the gun is an illegally acquired weapon then he needs additional jail time. Also, we're having a civil conversation so you can stop with the "calm down already". I'm willing to listen to other perspectives.
    7
  77. 7:22 the cammer is an idiot. It's not the sedan's fault and they weren't speeding as their lane was clear. The pickup is 100% at fault here.
    7
  78.  @avega2792  So then instead of understanding her frustration you decided to go the smug route and judge her. She has every right to be pissed as something as simple as an automated car wash shouldn't be difficult or end with a problem. I would be absolutely furious with the car wash employees and the Audi driver.
    7
  79. Then put your hazards on or just maintain your car so it doesn't give problems. Roads are for moving and a vehicle sitting still in a live lane of traffic poses a danger.
    6
  80. 7:17 why is the Officer telling the cammer to stop when they're trying to get out of her way? I don't want be stopped on the freeway in a live lane of traffic and risk getting rear ended. I want to get moving.
    6
  81. Ummm don't you know how right of way works? The fact the were yelling at the cammer all while blocking the road tells you of their personality. They are entitled and deserved to be honked at. If you read traffic laws you'd see the cammer and everyone on the road has the legal ROW. What if an emergency vehicle was coming through? Should they just wait too?
    6
  82. Yep. Too bad an innocent driver had to have their car and day ruined. Hopefully they weren't hurt.
    6
  83.  @HiltownJoe  You're reaching there Skippy. The pickup driver not only pulled a dumb move (cammer had the legal right of way) he decided to be a petty loser. Even if the cammer was laying on the horn the pickup driver should have went when the light turned green. Good thing he pulled that in Owen Sound, had he tried that in Toronto he would have definitely would have been attacked or shot and heck, he deserved it.
    6
  84. He was changing his lane. Debris shouldn't be in the road.
    6
  85.  @michaelmay7917  Zipper merge is NOT law. She deserves her come uppins, not the cammer. Read up on traffic laws.
    6
  86.  @jaylipinski1443  Ummm he has the legal right of way and the Hyundai driver cut in front of him. If he were to slam on his brakes to let her in he would run the risk of getting rear ended. The laws are clearly written and the person who wants to change lanes but yield to whoever is already in there. I don't blame him for getting mad as it is literally the law that he has the legal right of way.
    6
  87. How so? I see people upholding their legal right of way. Nothing wrong with that.
    6
  88.  @Skank_and_Gutterboy  Cammer does, by law, have the legal right of way. The Escape driver should have yielded. There's no proof here the cammer did anything afterwards.
    6
  89.  @donnash5813  That's not being considerate. The idiot in the truck should have turned right. Given how he was behaving along with his cow of a wife he didn't deserve the courtesy. You want to be a pushover in society then fine. I wouldn't have moved. The cammer had the legal right of way which means just that, they have the legal right of way.
    6
  90.  @glasshalffull2930  imagining things doesn't equate to reality. The real reason people drive like assholes is because they are assholes.
    6
  91. Yeah if it were me already in the lane I would have not let the cammer in. People seem to think zipper merging means driving as fast as you can and bully your way in once the lane ends but that's not how it works.
    6
  92. 6:05 possible insurance fraud? They're turning into a driveway and indicated on doing so. Just because you have crap brakes and tires doesn't make the other driver at fault.
    6
  93. The truck driver had a clear lane ahead of him so he changed his lane for no reason. Had they hit the truck driver would be at fault.
    6
  94. Regarding the first clip. "Well gee Officer the man approached my car in a threatening manner and it looked like he was reaching into his pocket. I feared for my life and my wife's life and floored it to get out of there running him over in the process".
    6
  95.  @MaxZomboni  How so? The truck driver has the legal ROW. Camaro driver is just an impatient douchebag. Right of way is right of way.
    6
  96. First off the zipper merge is merely a technique and not a law. Legally the cammer has the legal right of way and control of the lane. Whoever wants to change lanes has to yield to the cammer or anyone who may already be in the lane. From a fairness standpoint why should the cammer let the driver in? It only enables the bad drivers to commit future infractions so they might as well learn the hard way. I do not let people in especially traffic cheaters and last minute merges. Law is on my side anyway and my car has battle scars already so what's one more?
    6
  97.  @rp7773  You're shoving race where it does not belong. Some people are just plain angry douches. Nothing racial about that.
    6
  98. Derek might be one of the dumbest cammers I've seen in a while. Sure, the Civic driver did something dumb but driving over the median, speeding, cutting off, blocking, driving in the wrong direction and engaging in a chase is far more dangerous. Cops should be paying the cammer a visit, not the Civic driver. Also, why risk damaging the trim, suspension and even oil pan on your car by pulling such a dumb move?
    6
  99.  Daniel Drader  Yeah. One time I called the Police because I noticed a toddler in a hot car in a Wal Mart parking lot. I called 911 and they actually refused to send out Police, fire or EMS. The second I said that I will smash the window then they suddenly dispatched Officers. Within about 5 or 6 minutes 4 Officers showed up in 4 separate cars to lecture me on saying such things instead of smashing the window. Once everyone in the parking lot started yelling at the Officers to do something then they smashed the window after radioing to dispatch to get the kid out who was fine. The worst part is that this is a large city police force with 5500 full time Officers yet they're so mickey mouse at times.
    6
  100. That's what happened in Toronto earlier this week. We got over a foot of snow and tons of EVs were stuck on the highway. They couldn't run the heat because they had no battery charge and had to wait for a DIESEL tow truck to come get them. At least with a gas/diesel car if the battery is flat you can boost it and get it running because the alternator will take over but good luck doing that in a car that's more of a smartphone than a car.
    5
  101. He's honked his way through 3 States by now!
    5
  102. Truckers are on a strict schedule which is made worse because of all the laws telling them when to drive, when to stop, when to sleep etc... Also the biggest issue is when truckers arrive at a loading dock and now have to wait several hours to get loaded or unloaded which further cuts into their time. The cammer truck had no time to waste as every minute counts.
    5
  103.  @GlennC789  Ummm it was a 2 way stop. Malibu driver had to stop and the cammer had the legal ROW. Had their been a crash the Malibu driver would be found at fault. I don't blame the cammer for being mad. Plenty of people have their lives changed for the worse because of bad drivers and crashes so anyone who gets really upset at another bad driver is totally reasonable. It's also called eye for an eye. You want to roll over and play pacifist that's fine.
    5
  104.  @radiospazzable  Wrong. He let the black SUV in first which means the Focus driver needs to get behind the cammer. Use your brain.
    5
  105. He's simply exercising his legal right of way. The Fiat driver was the asshole here.
    5
  106. No he was driving within the law.
    5
  107. 0:15 you're better off PIT maneuvering these idiots. That'll teach them a lesson and you did nothing wrong. You had the right of way and they failed to yield.
    5
  108.  @MaxZomboni  Zipper merging is NOT a law genius. It's merely a technique. Look up merging laws and you'll see the trucker has the right of way. The LEGAL right of way.
    5
  109.  @petrjouda3332  Oh I won't deny that happens and I hate left lane hoggers but what ever justifies what the F150 driver did?
    5
  110. 0:39 yeah if I get into a road rage incident early in the morning on my way to work I usually have a bad day so I make sure to get back at that driver to ruin their's too.
    5
  111. It's amazing to me how people think side mirrors are for seeing your blind spot. It's not. It can be adjusted to partially cover your blind spot but that's why the shoulder check should be performed every time you change your lane. Read the drivers handbook in your state/province, it covers it and you should know that considering you hold a bloody driver's license.
    5
  112. 2:05 the Ford driver had the right of way. The Cruze driver cut in front of them. Is the road rage justified? No but you can't fault them for getting mad.
    5
  113.  @walamo4796  The Blazer cut the cammer off and paid the price for it. What was the cammer supposed to do? Slam on his brakes potentially causing an accident because of the Blazer's poor driving? Why would dash cam users purposely crash (and now have to deal with all of the usual BS afterwards) just for some content? Not worth the effort. Full fault goes to the Blazer driver.
    5
  114.  @robv5834  Nope. I just believe in fairness.
    5
  115. What is it with female drivers not admitting fault? They always argue and pull the entitlement card when they are clearly wrong. Funny thing is I got a dash cam after getting into it with a female driver years ago who turned in front of me.
    5
  116.  @RPG-oh1yf  Umm the laws say otherwise. The cammer had the legal right of way. The Jeep driver wants to cheat traffic and merge on a solid line that's on them.
    5
  117. CRV driver should have gone over right when the turning lane opened up. There is no legal obligation to let anyone in according to the law.
    5
  118.  @vintagetriplex3728  Those old GLs go cheap. They probably bought it at some crappy used lot because it's the only Mercedes they can afford.
    5
  119.  @valient71  He's the lunatic? Not the dumb driver that ran the red light or was distracted on her phone? I know it's a matter of perspective but a guy who has too much time on his hands versus someone who could risk injuring or killing someone I would think the latter is the real problem.
    5
  120.  @GoDaddioTV  Audi A6 later years don't come with manual in North America. Just a dumbass driver behind the wheel of it.
    5
  121.  @ramfat  Side mirrors can only partially cover your blindspot. The shoulder check is the important factor here.
    4
  122.  @CRB9000  You're missing the point here. Merging laws clearly state that the one changing lanes must yield. The cammer has the right of way. There is only ONE thing that matters on the road and that's driving within the law. The entitled dually driver should have changed lanes earlier instead of diving for the exit. If the cammer slammed on his brakes to let the truck in and got rear ended then what? Why is society so hell bent on enabling entitled people?
    4
  123.  @CRB9000  In a court of law your spiel about being polite would not hold up. In the eyes of the LAW the dually driver is the issue and the cammer acted within the law. Being polite is not an argument. Also, what about the pickup trying to run off by speeding away? He messed up in 2 ways.
    4
  124. There were 2 lanes. The Ram driver should have stayed in his lane but drifted over. Cammer had his wheels within the lane. Ram driver is at fault.
    4
  125. Yeah the Fiat driver is an asshole. Traffic code states that the car already in the lane has full control and the legal right of way.
    4
  126.  @neutralcommenter7800  Except it's not an a-hole move. People get angry at others when they are out of line. Nothing weird about that. I was rear ended when sitting at a red light by some distracted idiot doing 70 km/h. I was badly injured and it took over a year to get better. The other driver's insurance complied no issue as it was obvious as day what happened but all the distracted driver caught was a reckless driving charge and probably will get an insurance hike. When I sued him I recovered a small amount of money from him but he transferred his money into a different account to appear broke. Since then I have a bone to pick with bad drivers as they can ruin people's lives with their idiotic moves. How many innocent lives have been changed or lost due to bad driving?
    4
  127.  @sethallison5682  That's an entire car length which means if you give up your right of way then someone behind you will miss the light. Right of way belongs to the cammer.
    4
  128. 2:51 move your ass out of the fast lane. I don't care if someone wants to do 200 just let them pass. You had plenty of opportunities to move back into the right lane but you chose to hog the left.
    4
  129.  Kenneth Meadows  The truck driver has to wait on the cars on the road if they're turning out from a store or plaza. I t-boned a driver like that once (I would have been in the cammer's position) and the other driver was found 100% at fault. I could have stopped but why risk getting rear ended. I not only collected big I also taught the dumbass a lesson.
    4
  130.  Kenneth Meadows  Unable to find the exact law here under the OHTA (Ontario Canada) but it's obvious as day that anyone pulling out from a plaza has to wait until the road is clear in order to go. Had someone been going full speed on the road and T Boned the truck driver the truck driver would be at fault 100%. As for my story it happened and was clear as day from both the Police Officer and the other party's insurer. The pickup driver is wrong for pulling out AND for impeding the flow of traffic and it's not like his truck was actually broken down, he was just being a manchild.
    4
  131. He drove within the law. The semi and the cargo van could have kept in that lane as it was empty and kept going on for a long time. Had they crashed it would have been on the trucker.
    4
  132. 3:42 that must be so frustrating for police and other emergency services when people won't move the hell out of the way. I once saw a guy give the finger to a fire truck en route to an emergency. People are beyond dumb.
    4
  133.  @douglasrobichaud5028  So you're going to ignore the fact she doesn't understand how laws work, then throws something at his car then uses her female and white privilege to try and play the victim?
    4
  134.  @brohanfromrohan5771  Thing is in the second clip he had the right of way. F150 driver was the idiot.
    4
  135.  @briangereau788  My dashcam footage will be me driving within the law. Nothing defined within the driving laws about courtesy but there is no need for that if everyone drives within the law.
    4
  136. I usually egg them on more and get them more mad. Makes my day even better. My Hella horns scare the heck out of them.
    4
  137. I would have come to a complete stop to teach them a lesson.
    4
  138.  @twodog4220  But you were at fault though. If the person who was cut off or inconvenienced honks at you just take the L and move on and try to improve for the future. The road is no place to be making errors or mistakes.
    4
  139.  @brentfarvors192  Legally there is no obligation on the cammer in this example to let the other driver in. It's the other driver's job to merge safely which is what they should have done eons ago with the lane ending.
    4
  140.  @bullinapeamurica5940  Ex Police Tahoe with a reinforced crash bar in front. You can slap a diablo tune on the 5.3 motor. You got power, it's a vehicle you won't obsess over and it has pushing capability.
    4
  141. 1:01 get out of your car to rage at me? I'll drive off and take your door with me. Good luck explaining that one to your insurance that you were in the process of committing a crime, threatening someone and making them take off.
    4
  142. It was insured by the father but the driver was "excluded". The driver had no business driving it. The girl as well had no business doin what she did and I wouldn't have been mad had she gotten shot.
    4
  143.  @J.n.A.1993  You don't know that they got aggressive though. Even if they did get a little angry it's not an adverse reaction. When people get cut off they do feel like they were wronged.
    4
  144. Cammer had the right of way legally. Why not blame the uneducated Toyota driver?
    4
  145. Funny how you completely miss the BS actions of the pickup driver and focus on the cammer instead. The pickup driver, if they were going to pull that nonsense, should have at least expected people were going to honk. If a cop was around there he wouldn't be pulling over the person who honked, he'd be pulling over the pickup driver.
    4
  146.  @wardog0086  By your logic why follow any law then? The traffic code states the cammer has the right of way.
    4
  147.  @Turbo_The_Femboy_Fox  Where in the law does it say I have to let a traffic cheater in? My 4 wheels are in the lane therefore I control it. Anyone wanting to get in needs to yield as per law.
    4
  148. My horn is no longer blowing ice cold.
    4
  149.  @robv5834  Based on traffic laws the cammer is in the right and the Benz driver is in the wrong. What's there to argue? He stood his ground and had the legal ROW.
    4
  150. I lay on the horn too just to piss everyone off if I get cut off or if someone is blocking the road.
    4
  151. First clip was hilarious. The Accord driver had to be first. Well he got what he wanted I guess.
    4
  152. That woman chatting with her friends and blocking the road should try that in Texas. She's asking to get a gun drawn on her. I'm not saying it' right but that's what happens.
    4
  153. They're within the law though. Right of way goes to the cammer in this case. There is no legal obligation to let some entitled driver in.
    4
  154. 7:10 what's the Cruze driver all pissed off about? He's the one who cut in front of the Lexus.
    4
  155.  @brohanfromrohan5771  No the cammer successfully trolled an idiot.
    4
  156. Learn the traffic laws. Not the job of the cammer to let anyone in. The Honda driver is fully at fault.
    4
  157. 6:10 yeah I bet if you were in trouble you'd be calling the police and begging for their help.
    4
  158.  @A_moody26  Exactly. It's like people who take shit from others and just grin and bear it is somehow a desirable trait. I guess it's taboo to stand up for yourself any more.
    4
  159.  @JuniorFan08  The law states that the one merging has to yield. The cammer had the right of way. If we give up our right of way then what's the point of following any rules? This is 100% on the Toyota driver.
    4
  160.  @Ray56z  Cammer has the right of way in the situation with the blue F150.
    4
  161. Don't forget "Luckily I was paying attention". Umm one should always be paying attention if they're behind the wheel.
    4
  162. Not the law in Canada.
    3
  163. Turn the mic off. I listen to crap music too.
    3
  164. And you need to get educated. Traffic laws state that the vehicle merging must yield. The Fiat driver is the dick here.
    3
  165.    There will always be some residual battery power left as the alternator is what takes over after the car has been started up. Car maintenance is key to prevent breakdowns which not only inconveniences the driver but other drivers. Why should I be late to my destination because of someone else?
    3
  166.  @commonsence1129  Happened in the city where I lived. One driver retaliated by brake checking the vehicle that cut him off and he caused a 4 car collision which killed the motorist who was stuck in the middle of it all.
    3
  167. According to the traffic code the cars on the road have the legal right of way. Ram driver has to yield. Had they collided the Ram driver would be at fault.
    3
  168. What's with the cammers and their long winded descriptions? Instead of "Distracted driver pulls out in front of me" it's "I was headed home from Denny's after having 3 cups of coffee and a Grand Slam with extra bacon. The service was great. It was 80F outside and was getting hotter..." then nothing about the actual video footage.
    3
  169.  @Bcoz999  Who cares? The driver is always in control of the car. If they want to rely on some software then they are the problem.
    3
  170. Zipper merge is not a law. It's a technique. If you want to change lanes or merge you need to yield to the drivers already in the lane you want to change over into. The "Ute" driver should have slowed down and go behind the cammer but he decided to try bullying the cammer. No wrongdoing by the cammer. Learn your laws.
    3
  171.  @Johnsmith-bk3uk  Cammer and other drivers on the road he has the legal right of way.
    3
  172. Ummm don't you understand how driving laws work? That lane was a turn lane for the cammer specifically, not the Benz driver. This has nothing to do with ego but everything to do with driving within the law which is what everyone needs to do.
    3
  173. Find a law that states that. Given that there was another cop car up ahead the police were probably looking for someone. Ask yourself this. Finding a criminal or moving a trash can off the road what takes priority?
    3
  174. I'd follow the Allante driver and pour an entire soda into his convertible. The fact that the wife is sitting there quietly means his behavior is a normal thing and I wouldn't be surprised he puts his hands on her in anger all of the time.
    3
  175. Pretty sure you aren't supposed to merge in an unsafe manner either. The cammer had control of the lane. It's not his job to slam on his brakes to let some asshole who wants to cheat in.
    3
  176. Won't work because other drivers will keep going in front of you and you're going to have to drive under the speed limit to maintain distance.
    3
  177. You're expecting a California Liberal to think logically?
    3
  178. I wouldn't even get into it with someone over a parking spot. Let them have it. Let them think they won then come back a few minutes later and either let the air out of the tires to key the car up a bit. I have these big stickers that I just slap onto their windshield. No damage but it's hell to scrape it off especially in the summer and they can't drive until it's off because it's in their field of vision.
    3
  179.  @Bag_o_rocks  There is no pride here. Just following the law. The laws state that merging vehicles must yield.
    3
  180.  @fixipszikon6670  She broke the law by vandalizing his car. She didn't yield plus threw something at his car. Traffic infraction (almost) and vandalism and she had intent.
    3
  181.  @fixipszikon6670  So throwing an object then trying to play victim to get attention from others is a mistake? She's trash.
    3
  182.  @fixipszikon6670  There was no mistake here. There was entitlement on the Honda driver then she resorted to throwing things then playing victim. That right there is guilty behavior. Again, cite me the law saying I have to let an entitled ass in?
    3
  183. While the first cammer might be a jackass he's not legally wrong. It is up to the driver merging to merge safely. Zipper merging is merely a technique and not a law in Canada.
    3
  184. Okay so one day I will block you in after cutting you off. Don't honk though and don't get bent out of shape. The pickup driver was at fault and his gesture along with cutting the cammer off then acting all petty about it was pathetic. The truck driver is 100% at fault and who can fault the cammer for being pissed?
    3
  185.  @bimmere60ify  Not a mistake by the pickup driver. He does that all the time and gets away with it until the cammer came along. Some idiot wanted to change lanes into my lane because there was a crash up ahead. Instead of going behind me he tries to cut in and I don't let him in (law gives me right of way). He then proceeds to rage at me later on down the road. I brake checked him and he backed off. Between him being completely angry and now scared he won't ever do that again.
    3
  186.  @darrellturner799  Not in the eyes of the law.
    3
  187.  @metallikat05  No it does not work. I get over way before the lane ends so I can move with the flow of traffic.
    3
  188. Do you not know how road laws work? Cammer has no legal obligation to let the pickup driver in. Also, the pickup driver tried to get away but gave up after the cammer gave chase. Is he really the saint you paint him to be?
    3
  189.  @3030toby  I'll get the insurance money so why would I be mad.
    3
  190.  @BobMagana  Zippering is not written into law. Safe merging laws state that the merging driver has to ensure it's safe to merge. In the example of the video with the Mazda the cammer had no legal reason to let him in. The Mazda driver was just an entitled prick that got shut down and his reaction afterwards solidified that.
    3
  191. Seems like there's more in the first clip that's not being shown. Given how the cammer was driving a tad aggressive I wouldn't be surprised these guys were duking it out on the road preceding this clip. I gotta ask one thing. Was all of it worth it in the end?
    3
  192. That's all good and dandy but what justifies what he did after by getting out of his vehicle? I wouldn't be sympathetic to people who behave like a mongoloid.
    3
  193.  @scirfy  You speak from a place of privilege. Some bosses have it out for their employees and will fire them for anything. I persoanlly have never had a manager like that but I know they exist and they make their employees' lives hell.
    3
  194.  @scirfy  I get that but there could have been a crash earlier on that delayed other people. Maybe that person has to get their kid to school and can't drop them too early. There are many factors. I get to work 20 mins early every time just so I don't have to rush but there are times where there's a crash or something that screws up traffic and I end up late. Some people don't have good bosses.
    3
  195.  @scirfy  All the friendliness and helpfulness in the world won't help when you are out of a job and can't pay for groceries. Again, I don't have that issue but know it exists.
    3
  196.  @wardog0086  All it does is perpetuate the cycle of entitled drivers. If you don't give in they will at the very least get mad about it though hopefully they get the message.
    3
  197.  @larsharris  So it's the trucker's fault the Rav 4 turned in front of him? Idon't think so.
    3
  198. I love when cammers road rage with their crappy CVT Nissan. You can hear the transmission slipping and the motor just screaming and the car is going nowhere.
    3
  199. You're acting like it's the owner's fault. It's the fault of the moron who hit the car. Stop victim blaming.
    3
  200.  @jeffmalone5557  Right off the bad an entitled SUV driver won't yield. The cammer has the legal right of way.
    3
  201.  @ickisandoblina  That's debatable. Perhaps the victim wasn't able to maneuver out of the way. The only thing that matters anyway is that right of way is right of way.
    3
  202.  @legion7478  It is you who needs to calm down... Like the pickup driver.
    3
  203.  @Zeakthecat  I would wager that she's a typical woman that makes things about her all the damn time. What they don't realize is that situations like this is not about them. It's about helping the victims of the accident and making sure the at fault party gets in a good ton of trouble.
    3
  204. Yeah I once witnessed an SUV driver get cut off. He ended up raging, flying past the car that cut him off and brake checking the driver. The SUV ended up getting rear ended, lost control and ended up hitting another vehicle causing it to flip. Multiple injuries, tons of damage and insurance payments and of course charges. Rage isn't worth it. Getting home is.
    3
  205. Wow you really showed the uploader. I swear, You Tube should shut down for a week. People like you feel the need to get up on your high horse yet you'd be the first to bitch that there is no You Tube.
    3
  206.  @bk_deltor9155  Okay so I will let it go if someone almost kills me. No point in getting mad right?
    3
  207.  @kgb4187  If I'm following the law there's nothing I can get in trouble for. If people want to get pissed then turn in your license. I know how right of way works and right of way is right of way.
    3
  208. @Russ Olson He's right though. The Police are never around to help but as soon as you go 5 over the limit to keep up with the traffic flow they suddenly appear and pull you over.
    3
  209. I'm about to go on lunch brake.
    3
  210. If that first guy ever commits a murder it will be an easy one. "Uhhh yeah I killed that man over there with this exact knife. I stabbed him 4 times and dumped the body over there. It was 100% me and nobody else".
    3
  211. Brush up on your road laws. Cammer had the legal right of way. The legal right of way supersedes everything else.
    3
  212. The second clip might be one of the funniest dash cam clips I've seen. Well now we know why the pickup with the trailer was going "3 mph". I bet the moronic cammer raged even more at the guy going 3 mph.
    3
  213. 8:01 why would you feel bad for the van driver? It was the van driver that ran the red.
    3
  214.  @AveragePicker  At worst his leg would get run over.
    3
  215. I've seen quite a few clips involving Amazon Prime drivers and contractors. I guess they're the type that drive for Swift.
    3
  216. Clip 7 good on the cammer for chasing after the hit and run fool. I had to chase someone for 35kms with the Police on the phone to catch a hit and run driver.
    3
  217. 3:23 why would you hope the Nissan driver is okay? They need to be taught a hard lesson.
    3
  218. Liberals.
    3
  219. @Lando R If you read traffic laws they do state that the person wanting to change lanes has to yield to who is already in the lane. Just because their signal is on doesn't entitle them to squat. They need to wait. Right of way is right of way.
    3
  220.  @mindyschocolate  Zipper merge is merely a technique, not a law. The law states that the one merging has to yield. In other words the SUV driver needs to yield to the cammer.
    3
  221. Because road laws say that to merge you need to yield to everyone else already in the lane.
    3
  222. 4:14 The last thing you want to do is commit driving infractions and road rage in a company vehicle. That's a pretty obvious way to get fired.
    3
  223. 3:49 who cares you have a baby in the car? You're the one putting them in danger. The car turning right always has the right of way unless there was a protected left turn which in this case there was not.
    3
  224.  @drboze6781  That reminds me of the time someone said they saw a bunch of "Meese" walking on the road. I guess he felt the same rule for Goose=Geese applied to Moose too.
    2
  225. 3:28 anyone who crashes into emergency vehicles to prevent them from getting to an emergency should be blacklisted from ever receiving services from paramedics, police or fire. Paramedics will say that every minute counts in an emergency situation.
    2
  226. There is no real laws written into the traffic code regarding zipper merging. As it stands whoever is in the lane has the right of way and anyone wanting to get in has to yield. Driving as fast as you can then bullying your way into the lane is NOT zipper merging. I'd make it my life's work not to let him in.
    2
  227. That's how most houses in the GTA look. Same silly design. You also have some houses that try to mimic the look of a french chateau.
    2
  228.  @pacman3556  Scarborough is known for it's crime and car crashes though.
    2
  229. The person going straight has the legal right of way. How is it the cammer's fault? The cars turning left didn't have an advanced green or a protected left turn signal so the Benz driver was at fault.
    2
  230. Show me where in the law in that state where there is zipper merging
    2
  231. Why let the Honda in? It's not written into the law and when on the road follow the law. The cammer had the legal right of way the whole time. Also, it won't cost the cammer anything because the other insurance company will cover the cost plus the cammer can file a claim with said insurance company to also pay for the diminished value.
    2
  232.  @Brian1Graves  I'm from Canada but okay nice assumption. Courtesy means different things to different people but the traffic laws are clearly defined. The Honda driver had NO RIGHT to do what they did and are fully at fault.
    2
  233.  @Brian1Graves  Goober? Eh? Calm down I get it. You're from the prairies. The cammer didn't make anything worse. The Honda driver made a bad move, bullied his way in and then got mad and created a dangerous situation.
    2
  234. 5:20 no the van wasn't being impatient the SUV driver was a lane hog. Get your ass out of the fast lane.
    2
  235.  @karmaisreal261  How? That road has 2 lanes. They would be driving in tandem IF the pickup driver held his lane. It's leading to a dual roundabout.
    2
  236.  @Ottedikkie  Exactly. Too many pushovers here saying the cammer is at fault. If you want to let some entitled ass push you out of your lane or go out of turn that's on them but the law states that the one merging has to yield.
    2
  237. The law states that the one merging must yield. The cammer has no legal obligation to let someone in. Had they traded paint it would be the Explorer's fault.
    2
  238.  @criticalcerebral  Ummm so someone who crashes into another car and kills the occupants are simply human? Doubtful that's the case. I have never made such a mistake in 14 years of driving and quite frankly can't remember ever making a mistake even after 700,000kms of driving.
    2
  239. Find the law where zippering is written in? I bet you won't find it. It clearly states that the driver merging has to YIELD, in other words the Civic driver has to yield.
    2
  240. So would you like to be stuck in traffic and getting late to where you have to go to because some other boneheaded driver decided to cause a crash and now traffic is backed up for miles? My car is properly maintained, I have proper tires, I'm insured and am an expert driver so why should I pay the price of being late due to someone else's inability to do things right? That's why I always honk like crazy at car accident scenes just to piss off whoever was responsible for it.
    2
  241. So you'd be okay with me cutting you off and taking your legal right of way away?
    2
  242. There was no need to change lanes. Traffic was going slow and there was no exit.
    2
  243. I guess you're a saint and never did anything wrong. There are rules in life and one of them is wait your turn. Legally, the cammer did nothing wrong and we are bound by laws, not courtesy. The cammer had the legal right of way and the Altima driver was all over the place. Good on the cammer for putting space between himself and the Altima by overtaking in the end of the clip. You do realize that cut offs have caused major crashes that have killed people? If my life was put in danger I'm not getting over it until the other driver is reported and they get a little taste back.
    2
  244. Once rage takes over the frontal part of the brain responsible for logic shuts off.
    2
  245. Ummm he has the legal right of way. Entitled Tesla driver had plenty of time to change over earlier on.
    2
  246. I foresee a PIT maneuver in that BMW's future and it will be very well deserved.
    2
  247.  @expfcwintergreenv2.02  Umm don't you know how laws work? Traffic laws clearly state that the person merging has to yield to whoever is already in the lane. There is no legal obligation on the cammer to let the idiot in. Also, why enable entitled drivers to be entitled? One guy once absolute flipped his lid at me because I didn't let him in. I just kept driving as normal as he raged on for about 2 minutes. It was funny and sad at the same time but he was in the wrong plain and simple.
    2
  248.  @DJSkunkieButt  Again, a lawyer takes care of that and you simply take the other party to court for the legal fees. You can also sue them civilly afterwards as well.
    2
  249.  @MrStrizver  Yeah let's just let all criminals get away with shit. See what's happening in San Francisco? That's the end result of letting people be.
    2
  250.  @Nobody-px5xe  Towed a boat several times with a Sierra 2500HD. Never had an issue and I most certainly didn't take anyone's legal right of way.
    2
  251.  @ffjsb  No he does not. He's not supposed to impede the flow of traffic. The only people who could block the road is a construction company with permits and they have either Police or traffic controllers present. By your account I can just fly out of my driveway because who gives a shit about people on the road right?
    2
  252. 3:21 I hate when radio shows or commercials have sirens blasting or car horns beeping. Makes you think that they are coming from outside.
    2
  253.  @gingerman5123  It's got nothing to do with ego but everything to do with fairness and of course the law. I will hold my ground if the traffic laws give me right of way. Hit my vehicle and it's my old car versus your new bank owned overpriced crap. Guess who loses in the end?
    2
  254. Not his fault at all. The BMW driver not only turned when they weren't supposed to they also brake checked the cammer. The BMW driver might be a serial scammer so maybe this was a good lesson to be taught to the BMW driver.
    2
  255. She steals everything except for sun tan lotion.
    2
  256. Actually traffic laws clearly state that the person changing lanes has to yield. SUV driver did not yield so it's their fault. Their insurance will pay for the cammer's car and the Acadia they hit.
    2
  257. Brampton specifically. Really bad drivers there.
    2
  258. Or simply a door to the face. A broken nose would have been a great present.
    2
  259. What is it with people getting so excited when a bad driver gets pulled over. It's satisfying and all but I just kind of smile quietly and keep going. Guess I'm more emotionally mature than every one else.
    2
  260. Looks more like the VW is slowing down than the cammer speeding up. Right of way belongs to the cammer.
    2
  261. 0:36 "Officer he was trying to gain entry to my vehicle by kicking the window hence why I shot his ass dead".
    2
  262. Nothing to do with ego and everything to do with law and right of way. The cammer has the legal right of way and the Tesla driver had plenty of time to get over. It boggles my mind how entitled people are to think that they can just cheat traffic to get in and the other drivers should oblige.
    2
  263.  @ethanh.8768  Cammer has no legal obligation to yield. The Blue Elantra driver should be slowing down and yielding to the drivers on their left or change their lanes sooner. Whoever has all 4 wheels in the lane controls it so the cammer was in the right here. Don't forget the blue Elantra driver was now trying to cause an accident which adds to their list of bad driving.
    2
  264. 5:04 and Liberals want to defund the Police? Good thing they were there to get that scumbag off the streets. Those who commit hit and runs are downright scum of the earth.
    2
  265. SUV cut on a solid line and the cammer was simply correcting his trajectory otherwise he'd hit the curb. He hit the SUV because the SUV driver was cutting him off.
    2
  266. He was trying to put distance between himself and the bad Accord driver.
    2
  267.  @beanqween9458  Right but if the cammer slammed on their brakes to let the asshole in and got rear ended as a result that wouldn't be good either. Laws are clearly defined, courtesy will mean different things to different people.
    2
  268. Read up on the laws. They state that the driver that wants to change lanes must yield. The cammer has the right of way in this situation.
    2
  269.  @jeffk19  I see nothing in the traffic act that says one must zipper merge.
    2
  270. @Cipheiz Well that's fine but remember when you give up your right of way it will confuse other drivers around because they expect traffic to be flowing and not having somebody in front of them slamming on their brakes to let an entitled driver in.
    2
  271. 1:16 the bus driver did that to you because of your shitty dash cam.
    2
  272. Society is bettered by people who stand up to those who are a detriment to it. The boat guy was in the wrong and in the eyes of the law (something the citizens need to follow) the Tesla driver had the legal right of way. The boat driver and his cow wife were completely in the wrong and committed assault on top of their driving infraction so it seems like they're serial assholes. They need to be dealt with. Why let people get away with bullshit especially if it inconveniences you?
    2
  273. Or he was just trying to help. BTW certain extinguishers have the ability to quell gas and oil fires. Class B extinguishers. Only moron here is you.
    2
  274. Legally the cammer has the right of way and controls the lane as all 4 of his wheels are in it. The Prius driver needs to yield when changing lanes. What is the cammer to do? Slam on his brakes and risk getting rear ended just to let the entitled Prius driver in? Right of way is right of way and supersedes everything else. Courtesy is not a defined action like the various road laws.
    2
  275. Cammer is right though. Dash cams have WDR lenses and it makes things appear far away when in reality they're much closer. Audi driver was the culprit here, not the cammer.
    2
  276.  @GirlSmotheredToDeath  No it doesn't. If some distracted driver hits an innocent driver the only idiot is the distracted driver. I guess every drunk driving victim were idiots even though they did nothing to be hit by a drunk driver? Terrible logic.
    2
  277. Good on the trucker in the second clip for holding his ground. It's the job of the one merging to do so safely and if they want to run up until the lane ends instead of being sensible and merging ahead of time then prepared to get squeezed because I'm not letting you in.
    2
  278. 3:48 the pickup driver is not legally obligated to let you in. It's your job to merge safely so either hit the gas hard and speed up to at least match the flow of traffic or fall back if you see space behind you.
    2
  279.  @techenthusiast4542  The law clearly state that one must drive the speed limit. People can be charged for driving under the speed limit. It also presents a hazard. If his vehicle is experiencing mechanical issues then get off the road.
    2
  280.  @Lucky8s  Find a law that states what speed limit to drive in when there's snow on the ground. If the speed limit is, for example, 50 mph then go the speed limit. If there is a law that states to drive at 10 mph under when there is 2 inches of snow on the ground then fine but there is no clearly defined law on that.
    2
  281.  @smee5437  So what do you suggest? Every driver drive at 4 km/h since the posted speed is only a limit?
    2
  282. 1:42 that driver would be eating the solid steel brush guard on my Tahoe. We'll see whose smiling after that.
    2
  283.  @metallikat05  Find me a law that says that and don't say zipper merging. Zipper merging is merely a technique, not a law.
    2
  284. 4:45 Millwaukee Roundabout and 11' 8" have competition now.
    2
  285.  @Greydawg  Maybe not but one time I had a road bully rage at me because I didn't let him in (I had the right of way) and he ended up losing control of his pickup and put it in the ditch all because he was trying to chase me down and run me off the road. I bet he learned his lesson because his truck had to have been a goner. I went on with my day as usual.
    2
  286. The first video... Yeah her life does not matter.
    2
  287.  @CMTHFAF  How can you even side with the Sentra driver when they ran off? They committed a felony afterwards so I doubt they're as innocent as people are making the driver out to be.
    2
  288. Ohh good thing the Tesla owner is letting the public know they have a Tesla with their fancy little Tesla cam.
    2
  289. 4:05 doesn't matter if the Volvo driver was in a rush or not. They have the legal right of way and the Toyota driver didn't yield. Also, look at how well the Volvo handled the crash and look at the Toyota that's now probably totaled.
    2
  290. Cammer has the legal right of way. Merging laws clearly state the one changing lanes has to yield to drivers already there.
    2
  291.  @briangereau788  Yeah but trying to prove that in a court of law is going to be tough.
    2
  292. Because the cammer has the legal right of way. Also, the at fault driver ran so now it's a felony. Cammer did nothing wrong.
    2
  293.  @Captainllama  K. Didn't read all that crap but good effort.
    2
  294. Except that's not why the guy got brake checked you moron. The Ford driver was just an impatient asshole. At what point in during driving is brake checking okay? The fact you're actually defending any POS that brake checks goes to show you're as stupid as they are.
    2
  295. That's what happened with my friend. He's got an old Ford F250 with a trailer hitch on it and was rear ended by a lady in a new Mercedes E Class. The rear bumper and lift gate on the F250 were slightly damaged (hammered back into shape) and the Mercedes was probably a write off. The entire front end was smashed up and it pissed out every fluid.
    2
  296. Lack of self awareness? The cammer properly avoided the sliding car. Also, the other car slid because of either the wrong tires, poor maintenance or poor driving. A honk isn't the worst thing to bring some awareness to the situation.
    2
  297.  @andrewdinns1746  Or just go read the driver’s handbook...
    2
  298.  @Strykar86  Probably on a lunch break. Gotta move quick on lunch breaks to go grab lunch and still have time to eat.
    2
  299. 2:35 satisfying as hell. Enjoy the concussion, the bruised ego and the long walk back to your vehicle assuming it's still even there.
    2
  300.  @larsharris  If you wish to give up your legal right of way you are a bigger threat to the road than any of the "aggressive" drivers you're talking about. The cammer has the legal right of way in all of these situations and according to the law, the right of way supersedes everything with the exception of yielding to emergency vehicles with their flashers and sirens on.
    2
  301. @Giada_De_Low_Rent_Tits Except there is no law that was broken by the cammer. The cammer had the legal right of way and backing up would have meant breaking the law as the direction of traffic flow for the lane would change. It would have also meant enabling 2 very terrible people and only allowing them to commit a bullshit act like this once again. They obviously feel the world revolves around them so to see them get put in their place was satisfying. If I have the right of way I am going no matter what. If we hit, we hit as it will be the other party's fault. You're either right or wrong, there's no middle ground. Cammer had the right of way and was trying to enact his right of way and the boater was wrong along with that cow wife.
    2
  302. Because the video started rather late in the first clip I'm willing to bet the cyclists isn't all that innocent especially considering 2 drivers are pissed at him. Cyclists want equal treatment but don't pay for insurance, registration, plates or taxes to keep the roads maintained. Stay to the right at the very least and let cars get by.
    2
  303. Exactly. It's like when Wal Mart wants to see your receipt on the way out because of other people stealing. Don't treat your honest paying customers like thieves by forcing your dumb policies on us because of a few low lives.
    2
  304. 3:24 he has the money to afford a $70k plus truck. What's he so mad about in life?
    2
  305. One time some jerk raged at me and walked up to my car. He got a face full of door and I drove off. As soon as anyone gets out of their car to rage they deserve whatever happens next.
    2
  306. The cammer was in the right though. Infiniti driver cut over the opposite lane.
    2
  307.  @DestinationJapan95  If being sensible makes me a boomer then I'm good with that.
    2
  308.  @potentialaccident8196  She has no reason to be reacting like that. The accident did not happen to her. It's not about the woman as much as she would like the attention being directed to her at all times. It's about the crash.
    2
  309.  @ashlaynesaar  The difference is that you were in an accident which is different than witnessing one. The woman in the camera car witnessed an accident and decided to now have everyone tend to her when the focus is not about her in this moment.
    2
  310.  @ashlaynesaar  Congrats not being able to tell the difference between actually being in an accident versus witnessing one. Your situation is totally different to this woman's situation. This situation is NOT about her full stop. She is trying to make something about her when it is not.
    2
  311. The driving laws state that the person who wants to merge has to yield. The SUV driver should wait until the cammer, who has the legal ROW, passes.
    2
  312. They felt cheated because they initially had the green light and would have had to wait after being inconvenienced by the truck driver. They still did better than me though. I would have hit the truck and claimed the insurance.
    2
  313. But why enable bad drivers to be bad drivers? Do employers enable their employees to do a shitty job? Do people enable their family members to behave like assholes? Probably not so don't let them in, the law says so.
    2
  314.  @hamletksquid2702  Yeah but guess which one holds up in court. Would the "He should have been courteous" argument hold up or would "Well your honor I had the legal right of way as per the highway traffic act" argument hold up? Cammer's argument would hold up.
    2
  315. 3:30 It's sad you're more concerned about yourself and your car despite you being reckless. Her day is inconvenienced, her truck could be part of her livelihood and all I see you talking about how fine you are. I bet you never showed the cops or insurance the footage.
    2
  316. How is it an ego thing? Standing your ground against entitled drivers and to an extent entitled people has to do with ego? No, it has to do with fairness. How would you deal with a traffic cheater?
    2
  317.  @alloneword7427  Alright we'll do a test. I'll do dangerous maneuvers around you. Make sure to be mature about it and let it go even though I put your safety, occupants and car in danger. Practice what you preach.
    2
  318.  @dannyt5705  Legal right of way supersedes everything written in the law except yielding to emergency vehicles. The cammer did nothing wrong, it's 100% on the Altima driver. Mistakes shouldn't be made on the road and anyone who is in the right should stand their ground.
    2
  319. 7:03 talk about distracted driver. People like that should be subject to a 500% insurance increase. That'll teach them not to be dumb on the road.
    2
  320. 2:31 I can tell that's an ex police Crown Vic. Guy thinks he's a cop now?
    2
  321. Moran?
    2
  322. 6:18 you think they have time to see if you're Asian? Get over yourself. Yeah, attacks on Asians have been an issue as of late but not EVERYTHING applies to that especially some driver turning in front of you. Even if you have a large sign on the car saying "I'm Asian" I doubt someone else's bad driving is about that.
    2
  323.  @hotdoggington6962  I get the concept. It's just that it won't work with the North American mentality. Everyone will use it as an excuse to pass on the right and bunch up at the very end. Add in people who don't want to let the other drivers merge and it will be crash central.
    2
  324.  @davidrennicke9852  Why would you want go be inconvenienced by someone else's stupidity? Some roads it would be quite the drive to turn around so why not turn where you're supposed to turn? When someone is in the middle of the aisle of the grocery store do you say "excuse me?" or walk down an entirely different aisle to come around? Probably not. You realize she was 100% in the wrong here?
    2
  325.  @williamtoose2453  Read the traffic code in any province or state. It will clearly state that the person changing lanes must yield. There is 0 legal obligation to let someone in as they don’t have the right of way. The law is clearly defined.
    2
  326. Probably not going to get in trouble. A female killed a cyclist where I lived and she got 6 months house arrest.
    2
  327. 4:37 yeah let's see how much that social right of way works out in court...
    2
  328. Are you a dumbass? You can overtake on a road where the lines are broken up...You have no right to be telling anybody anything since you can't get your shit right.
    2
  329. Yeah can you just ask your open wound to stop bleeding for about the next 30 mins or so?
    2
  330. This is not a pissing contest. Crashes are not victimless so each one should be treated with the same care. You want a cookie for responding to a bigger crash?
    2
  331. Seems like the Karen has brake checked people before. The second I see a car with a bunch of new and unpainted or bashed up bumpers/panels I stay away.
    2
  332.  @laurawilliams9672  But define "courtesy". Why should one be courteous to an idiot who wouldn't even appreciate it? I'm nice to those who deserve to be treated well and am extra patient with old people or the disabled. As for any able bodied person who acts like a total douchebag and is entitled they don't get an ounce of it from me. Also, how is me following the law and staying out of legal trouble being a problem with 90% of the country?
    2
  333. 3:26 911 can go screw themselves. If they don't want to send Police out then I'm chasing after the fool. It's funny because when the Police want help they ask the public for dash cam footage but when it's the other way around they don't want to help?
    2
  334.  @marlonperez9379  Look into cameras from Vantrue. I had one that started to record a little fuzzy and they helped replace it in no time. Second one has been great for years now.
    2
  335. I think they want to but they're in a bit of shock from the impact of the crash. One time though I witnessed a driver rear end another car. The guy who got rear ended came out and basically beat the brakes off of the offending driver.
    2
  336.  @kgb4187  Courtesy cannot be legally or clearly defined. It will mean different things to different people. One must drive within the law, that's it. It is the other driver's responsibility to yield regardless of where they want to go. What should one do? Slam on their brakes in a live lane of traffic to let the other person in because of cOUrTesy?
    2
  337.  @kgb4187  Again, driving within the law matters. Right of way matters.
    2
  338.  @AzureTwilight  Traffic slowed. We're talking about the cammer versus the Jeep driver. Jeep driver has to yield to the cammer.
    2
  339. Zipper merge is merely a technique, not a law. The Subaru's lane was ending so its their responsibility to get over safely. In this case they shouldn't have tried to pry their way in between the cammer and the truck. Cammer had full right of way. Right of way supersedes everything else on the road other than yielding to emergency vehicles.
    2
  340.  @neutralcommenter7800  Personality traits do not matter on the road. Road laws matter. Right of way is right of way. I could literally t bone someone turning left in front of me and it would be their fault.
    2
  341.  @jaynecobb1  Exactly. It should be treated the same as impaired driving. It's super unfair to the victim of someone's selfish driving.
    2
  342. Hit and run drivers are absolute scum. Looks like the Karen in the passenger seat actually wanted to get mad at the people who boxed the guilty party in. Just when I think people can't get any stupider.
    2
  343. A nice push bar on the front of your vehicle will deter brake checkers. Having a dash cam plus a push bar will not only damage the shit out of their vehicles but will also prove them at fault. Double whammy.
    2
  344. To the guy in the first clip perhaps you should quit driving then. It's not fair to other motorists that you're inability to manage a perfectly manageable condition should mean extra risk to them. A car is a great tool but only when it's used correctly. Hopefully the doctors and the DMV pulled your license. I want to get home safely at the end of the day but between the distracted, drunk, impaired and reckless drivers I see I become worried about becoming one of their victims.
    2
  345.  @chucksmith7292  Then what's the point of any traffic laws if nobody is going to follow them? Right of way is right of way and if we trade paint guess whose insurance is paying? It'll be my old car versus their bank owned overpriced car.
    2
  346. Caddy driver in the first clip needs to learn to mind their own business. If the Honda driver (who admittedly messed up) was able to keep going and not engage then the Cadillac driver should just go along their way.
    2
  347. 0:29 Oh I don't know how about inspecting your vehicle every time you change your oil? When bushings or ball joints let go they had to have been worn for the longest time.
    2
  348.  @Nalla328  Or the cammer was just following the law. Merging laws are pretty clearly defined and the Sentra driver was in the wrong.
    2
  349. 2:48 this is the exact moment the cammer could have made the choice NOT to engage with the Malibu driver but decided to keep raging. Since they both went on their merry way after what did any of that accomplish?
    2
  350. First clip if they're that triggered when riding a bike then they shouldn't ride a bike.
    2
  351. You are giving up your legal right of way. It will confuse drivers behind you if you slam on your brakes to let someone in who doesn't have the legal right of way.
    2
  352. Black people are protesting about how their lives matter yet they purposely put themselves in dumb situations and expect sympathy. If black lives matter then they need to value their own lives more.
    2
  353. A new law needs to be written. IF a driver brake checks a truck the truck driver should be allowed to ram the brake checker instead of having to slam on the brakes.
    2
  354. First cammer was driving within the law. Traffic laws state that the drivers merging have to yield which the van and truck driver did NOT do.
    2
  355. I watched the second clip over many times and the cammer turned on a stale red. Driver in the Nissan had every right to be pissed. Cammer's brain doesn't seem to be firing on all cylinders if they commit a traffic infraction and then commit another one by excessively honking.
    2
  356. Except she checked on the guilty party instead of the innocent party. Biased because the guilty driver is female.
    2
  357.  @vintagetriplex3728  Oh I know. I work at a GM dealership and we take older MBs on trade quite often. They usually need $3k - $4k of work before they can even pass safety so just put them up for sale as is and if they don't sell in 30 days they just get sent to auction. Somebody always scoops them up there. Sometimes we stock a few cheap CLAs and GLAs as they sell quick, people just want the badge for cheap.
    2
  358.  @commonsence1129  I'm wondering if when the cammer braked the vehicle pulled to the left. I doubt the cammer would put themselves and their kid in danger like that.
    2
  359.  @Greydawg  Don't block the street. I never tap my horn. It's a all out blast... Usually pisses off the driver enough that they might think twice before doing whatever they did again.
    2
  360. Fiat driver should have gotten into the lane earlier.
    2
  361. 3:01 the lady in the 4Runner with the trailer was right. The road was closed yet the cammer was persistent on trying cross the double yellow line to keep going. If anything the 4Runner driver prevented the cammer from doing anything else stupid. Too bad the cammer and the husband seem to think they're in the right.
    2
  362.  @redsox2722  Really? So the drunk driver that crashed into a family and killed them didn't mean it? The driver speeding in their sports car that put other people in danger didn't mean it? The person who was on their phone and cut you off nearly causing you to wreck didn't mean it? Okay, let me crash into your car as hard as I can. Don't take it personally though. Have some self respect and not let yourself get bullied about like that. Also, read up on right of way laws. Right of way is right of way.
    2
  363. It's a dash cam idiot.
    2
  364.  @ineedbigdrink8509  Not true. Wide angle lenses of dash cams make it seem like there is a large enough gap when there isn't. Realize that if the cammer were to step on the brakes because of some entitled driver then the cammer would be rear ended. There is no LEGAL obligation on anyone to let someone in and even if insurance tried to place blame on the cammer that could easily be appealed.
    2
  365.  @ineedbigdrink8509  Whose wheels are in the lane already? The cammer's therefore they have control of the lane. Cammer would not be at fault even if they sped up. Dick move? Yeah sort of but not illegal.
    2
  366. By law the cammer has the legal right of way. Why enable an entitled driver just change lanes and potentially cause a crash?
    2
  367.  @GoDaddioTV  Cars don't just stall.
    2
  368.  @GoDaddioTV  Then you should know that the A6 in it's later years did not come with a manual in North American models.
    2
  369.  @kennethkirkham2471  Actually the yield and merging laws would come into effect here. Toyota should have yielded. Cammer has no legal obligation ever to let someone in.
    2
  370. Zipper merging is not written into traffic laws. Right of way is simple. Want to merge? Yield to the people already in the lane you wish to go into. Simple as that. Right of way is right of way.
    2
  371.  @DJJumpdancer  AWD doesn't mean shit. You're probably one of those dumbasses who use AS tires in winter because "i HaVE wInTERZ TiREz". The tires count. Winter tires are the important factor here.
    2
  372.  @arox4133  I've done it so yeah, I know how it works. Somebody else's stupidity worked in my favor.
    2
  373. It probably has playback mode but the cammer didn't know. I keep a micro sd card to lightning cable in my car so if I have to transfer any video over to my phone I can do it quickly.
    2
  374.  Daniel Drader  Funny you mention Toronto because it was them I was referring to. Some of them are great and some others it's like they don't even exist but collect a $100k per year paycheque.
    2
  375. Dude are you blind? The person who crashed into the cammer was fully driving across the parking spaces. The cammer was parking. It's obvious as day. Pause at 5:31, you''ll clearly see there are lines for parking spaces hence why that white Nissan Rogue is parked. You can put the video at full screen and it'll help. Also, see the gap between where the cammer is parked and the parking rows ahead, that's where the car who crashed should have been driving. Not the parking spaces.
    2
  376. Sorry but when someone tries to run me off the road and put me in danger then it IS personal.
    1
  377. 1:04 hopefully that truck driver doesn't represent the majority of American truck drivers. It's a serious profession and here in Canada that would be an automatic firing and suspension or revoking of their license. Guys got to get it together down south.
    1
  378. Biker will run into the wrong guy one day and I won't feel sorry him.
    1
  379. Might as well knock the house down so she can get out. What a shit driver.
    1
  380. 4:58 you got yourself dummy. The drivers on the roadway have right of way plus you were trying to cut across traffic over solid lines. No way you can think you're in the right. Hopefully your vehicle got hit really hard so your insurance thinks twice about keeping you on their policy.
    1
  381. The 350Z kept up in the second run. Sounds like he missed a gear in the first run. The fact that a car designed in the early 2000s with over 100 less HP against that much more modern SRT Charger kept up is pretty good.
    1
  382. He had the right of way in the first clip. Read up on the OHTA.
    1
  383. I would have laid on the horn for a good long while in the second clip. Let the old man get a heart attack from all the screaming.
    1
  384. I think they have a bunch of other problems in life (most of which they created because of their attitude) and that one thing that happened was the straw that broke the camel's back and their true demon inner self comes out.
    1
  385. Aren't we all
    1
  386. 2:58 "Your honor I would like to plea non quilty please".
    1
  387.  @jeremyhubbard2908  Try Toronto and the GTA. Really bad drivers. I could lay on the horn and they never even turn their head.
    1
  388.  @traitoR142  Who cares what you think? The laws clearly state that anyone merging has to yield. In other words the asshole in the Tacoma needs to wait his ass.
    1
  389. Giving up the right of way would actually pin the cammer at fault as he could have been rear ended by slamming on the brakes. Cammer has the legal right of way. Everyone should drive within the law, not their definition of courtesy as that will vary. The law has clearly defined actions.
    1
  390. Yeah you guys have it good in Texas. I live in Canada where we can't do that but I did give a road rager a face full of door when he came up to my car. It was effective.
    1
  391.  @bozodog428  Law states that the driver merging has to yield. The Toyota driver needed to yield. The cammer has no legal obligation to let someone in.
    1
  392.  @terrystratford1235  No he wouldn't. The cammer has the legal right of way. Right of way is right of way.
    1
  393.  @terrystratford1235  Insurance can only rule by what's within the law, not their feelings. The law supersedes the insurance company so they need to work within the boundaries of the law.
    1
  394.  @jasonguerette921  It works if everyone is doing the same speed and everyone cooperates. People don't cooperate and good luck getting people to change up their habits to the point they let others in. Where I commute you literally have people who will full well block mergers or even cheaters to the point a crash occurs.
    1
  395. Clip 1 that rager's life doesn't matter despite what you Liberals would say.
    1
  396. I saw another aspect of the incident in clip 2. Both the mother and daughter need some serious psychiatric help. That girl was screaming at the top of her lungs. To think that female privilege is so rampant in a time we're calling for equality is just sad. You can't be the aggressor then play the victim. Also, screw Durham Regional Police for letting the women off scot free.
    1
  397. Why is it that the ones who honk the most have the shittiest horns?
    1
  398.  @brysonrodden5112  The Jeep driver felt cheated because someone got ahead of them illegally. It's like traffic cheaters running up and bullying their way in. I never let them in and get back to the front.
    1
  399.  @brysonrodden5112  It gets them off my ass though plus if they hit my it's insurance money for me. If anyone asks my dash cam "malfunctioned" and more than likely the other driver didn't have one. Most cammers don't make mistakes.
    1
  400.  @brysonrodden5112  Well then both of us will get into trouble because you cheated traffic and crossed a solid line and I might catch a reckless driving charge that will get reduced in court anyway. No biggie.
    1
  401. I had a Mazda Protege that would honk the horn if I braked too hard. It's like the force of the braking would cause the horn part on the steering wheel to go forward just enough to make contact and then beep. I just ended up shoving some pieces of soft rubber in between the horn part and the steering wheel. It required a harder push to honk it when I needed to but it at the least stopped the honking problem.
    1
  402. The VW slowed down, the cammer did not speed up. Also, it has nothing to do with ego it has everything to do with laws. When changing lanes it is up to the person changing lanes to yield. Also, who has the big ego? The cammer or the at fault driver who refuses to admit he's wrong and runs on top of that?
    1
  403. 7:48 I love how everyone goes to check on the guilty driver. Hello, they're not the victims here.
    1
  404. Speak for yourself idiot. I read them, you don't represent me or anyone else. Also, You Tube is hard on compilation channels so they're forced to do voice over commentary or written commentary.
    1
  405. Not by law. The person merging has to yield. The Taco driver didn't yield and behaved like a total child afterwards. He is the one at fault. Drive within the law, courtesy is not a law.
    1
  406.  @ThatCarGuy2  Sure but the Tacoma driver probably goes around being a total nutcase so it's nice to deny these entitled fools the opportunity to feel superior once in a while.
    1
  407.  @ThatCarGuy2  Anyone who thinks their signal equals them having the right of way is an entitled prick. I never let them in.
    1
  408. Tahoe.
    1
  409. Sorry but the cammer in the first clip fully cut the Kia driver off. I heard the blindspot warning go off and you hear the Kia driver using the horn. Cammer deserved a lot worse for that. They got lucky.
    1
  410.  @Brian1Graves  I will drive within the law. Plain and simple. If someone wants to try and bully their way in when I have the right of way? Go ahead, we'll hit and it will be my old banged up Benz versus their bank owned overpriced car and I will have it on dash cam. Replacement parts will be found at any wreckers for my car and their bank owned car will be in the shop for months before they get parts and they can enjoy the diminished value yet continue to make payments on a overpriced car.
    1
  411.  @Brian1Graves  Good. We'll see which argument holds up in court. Your opinion of how I should be or me driving within the law.
    1
  412.  @Brian1Graves  As long as I win.
    1
  413. Anyone who gets out of their car to rage at another driver deserved to be pepper sprayed.
    1
  414. 2:04 honestly I would have just opened the door and let it break the nose of the rager.
    1
  415. Reading into the laws the car already in the lane has the legal right of way. Signal shows intent but does not signify a right of way.
    1
  416. 3:01 that's the person I'd purposely hit. Would be their fault any way and the inconvenience would teach them a lesson.
    1
  417. There are 3 for sure things in life. Death, taxes and Milwaukee Roundabout crashes.
    1
  418.  @DeathhAngel1  He probably had winter tires and a proper ride height. In Quebec winter tires are required by law so he was well equipped to handle the snow. If the cammer slid into the lane of the pickup and hit it then he would be at fault but it was the other way around. Nowhere in the law does it say to drive slower in bad weather. It does state, however, how right of way works and how lane changes work.
    1
  419. 4:58 if the driver told me to shush because he's on the phone I would just lay on the horn.
    1
  420. 8:35 I don't blame them one bit. I would do the same. Why should I have to be late to where I'm going because some other idiot caused an an accident and now the highway is blocked up. I didn't cause the accident therefore I shouldn't be paying the price with my time.
    1
  421. 2:00 "I was a dick because I can't take responsibility for myself and would rather make excuses to You Tube to see if I can get some sympathy but oh shit it backfired". FTFY.
    1
  422. Except he's following the law unlike the Altima driver. You want to let entitled drivers in and enable them then fine but I'll stand my ground.
    1
  423. 4:03 the cammer did nothing wrong. He had the legal right of way, it was the GMC driver that bullied their way in.
    1
  424. Yep so is "(Insert your city/town name here) has the worst drivers in the USA" line too.
    1
  425. 3:25 this is the issue with California. They always side with the wrong person. The VW driver had every right to be pissed.
    1
  426.    The lights don't need much power to operate. They would still work unless the leads were severed.
    1
  427. The douchebag in the BMW took the term "Black Lives Matter" too literally. Fuck that guy. He should be blacklisted from ever receiving emergency services if his ego matters more than using common sense to move over. I love how he reached into his glovebox to try and make it seem like he's reaching for a gun but the cammer called his bluff. Here's the sad part. Black people will actually stand up for him despite his actions.
    1
  428. It would have been better if the Yukon driver hit the sign. The funny thing is in the original video is that he probably kept blaming the pickup driver for his mistake.
    1
  429.  @hideouslemur5541  Find me a law that says I have to let someone back out into live lanes? It's not a matter of courtesy, it's a matter of law. The cammer is a total ass.
    1
  430.  @jcadult101  Not the cammer's fault. The Jeep driver needed to check over the shoulder. Also, most of those Grand Cherokees have blindspot monitoring.
    1
  431. If you get out of your car to rage at me you can take your pick. 1) A face full of door or 2) A face full of bear spray and for some there's 3) A Glock pointed square at your head.
    1
  432. I would love for the first idiots to come at my car. It would be bear spray time.
    1
  433. The guy in the second clip better keep the same energy when he gets bear sprayed.
    1
  434. Why is it the ones with the crappiest cars and CVT transmissions the ones who try and give chase to another car?
    1
  435.  @jsoe81657  Actually SilentBob is right. Right of way and merging laws dictate that the cammer is in the right. If you want to change lanes you have to yield.
    1
  436. 5:15 if I were the cammer I would have sat right there. That pumper is on a strict time schedule so I'll let him stew and waste his time. First is first and the cammer was first.
    1
  437. He's trying to get away from the rager. It's kind of understandable that they'd take some mildly dangerous moves to get out of there and NOT engage with someone.
    1
  438.  @somuchfortalent  So what would you do? Treat the rager to lunch?
    1
  439. 1:05 seriously screw that kid. I can tell he's the type that screams and runs the house because his parents have no balls. Nobody who understands responsibility acts like that. He needs to try that in Texas... He won't have a second chance to do right or wrong.
    1
  440. Actually I can understand the frustration in the first clip. The Audi driver and the car wash employees are at fault here. The Audi driver should have gone straight and the car wash employees should have noticed something wrong and stopped the conveyor.
    1
  441.  @231mac  Well she didn't even have her overhead lights on when pushing the truck out of the way and there was another CHP unit not too far back (as seen in the video). She could have radioed for them to do traffic calming and everybody would have gradually slowed down safely. When you have one lane where everyone is flying down and 1 is stopped up because of an irresponsible driver and the cop now blocks off another one that creates a dangerous situation. Had the cammer been rear ended that would have been on the driver who rear ended them of course but partly on the officer too and one could argue the person who was just parked there in the middle of the highway.
    1
  442. Clip 2 don't worry you're not an idiot. It's a cyclist we're talking about here. They don't pay taxes, aren't insured, have a toxic behavior and don't contribute to society in any way so screw them.
    1
  443. Traffic laws state that the car merging must yield. There is no legal obligation to let someone in. Also, why enable someone to be a shit driver?
    1
  444. What a POS that vandal is. Also, good on the cammer who chased down the hit and run guy. Hit and run should be an automatic drop by insurance and the only way to get insured is through high risk. In addition to that they should receive a 1 year driving ban and felony charges.
    1
  445.  @DJSkunkieButt  I will follow the law and nowhere in the law does it say to let anyone in. The statutes within the traffic code clearly define what I can and can't do and as long as I am within the law it doesn't matter if I cause a major crash. I won't be in trouble and I won't care about the collateral.
    1
  446.  @MrStrizver  I never said that but believe what you want. What bystander casualties would occur from chasing after these fools?
    1
  447.  @glenhumphreys4289  Why? I am on that road and there is no sinkhole so why should I turn around?
    1
  448.  @stoney2732  Well construction companies have permits to block certain areas which makes sense for employee and public safety. There is no issue there. These clowns with the trailer could have waited until everyone else cleared out and again, they have the legal right of way. Should they take their time if an emergency vehicle was coming through?
    1
  449. 6:11 there is no lesson for the cammer to learn. They had the legal right of way. CRV driver is the real idiot here.
    1
  450. 5:48 idiotic drivers like that deserve a good brake check. Let the ladder go through their back window.
    1
  451. Tow truck drivers are scumbags. Every single one of them. They are especially bad on Ontario, Canada where the highway patrol, the OPP, basically created the first come first serve for tow trucks so now it's an unregulated industry with tow truck drivers nearly killing other people rushing to get to an accident scene.
    1
  452. Zipper merging is not a law in that state. Merger must yield.
    1
  453. One guy was listening to a Halo audio book.
    1
  454. 7:13 driver should lose their license for life. That could have easily resulted in a pedestrian being hit and potentially killed or a car with an entire family in it.
    1
  455.  @jeremyhubbard2908  So what would you do? Go to another street? Benz driver was in the wrong period.
    1
  456.  @robv5834  Being a jerk isn't illegal. Benz driver's actions were though. Cammer was just standing their ground. Perhaps I should bud in front of you at the grocery store, steal your woman and damage your stuff. By your mentality just let it go right?
    1
  457.  @robv5834  Well ROW does supersede everything except having to yield to emergency vehicles with their lights or sirens on.
    1
  458. Amazon Prime drivers are total shit. Seen tons of them in person and on dash cam compilations of them making some stupid moves.
    1
  459.  @DJJumpdancer  That's the only job of an officer? What about responding to calls?
    1
  460.  @gingerman5123  Read up on traffic laws.
    1
  461.  @gingerman5123  You realize that the traffic code is there for a reason right?
    1
  462. If you get out of your car to approach me in a threatening manner I will forcibly remove the door on your overpriced bank owned car. Explain that one to insurance. Hey, I was scared for my safety and took action to get out of there.
    1
  463. 1:47 that Jeep driver needs to lose his license forever in all States.
    1
  464. Sometimes it's better to crash into someone versus slamming on your brakes and getting rear ended. Right of way is right of way.
    1
  465. Clip 1 and that would achieve precisely what? Sure there are laws but there are other factors like shitty road design so logic would tell me to look out for other idiots so I don't damage my vehicle or worse harm myself or my passengers.
    1
  466. 3:22 and that's why you don't do shit for anyone. Let the car roll away. It's her fault and her problem. Now that you've helped the lady somehow (knowing how Americans are) she would probably turn around and sue you.
    1
  467.  @DaveInSC  Zipper merging is not mandated by law. Laws clearly state that the merging car should do so when safe. There is no legal obligation on the part of the driver who is already in the lane the other person wants to merge into.
    1
  468.  @brentfarvors192  That's what looking ahead takes care of.
    1
  469.  @leexgx  Cammer was in the right. He held his speed as law states and had no obligation to let the Mazda in.
    1
  470. Cyclist are known to fake accidents to get car drivers in trouble. Nothing happened to this cyclist. It was a definite scam.
    1
  471. Last clip seems intentional. We had something like that occur once in our city where someone crashed a van into multiple vehicles and kept going until the vehicle was disable. It was an on purpose attack.
    1
  472.  @jonathan.varghese  GMC Acadia
    1
  473.  @egenesis1  Blinkers do not give absolute right of way. The SUV driver should have yielded to the cammer.
    1
  474. That cop is a total asshole. I usually support police but until this stuff stops the hostility between the police and the public will always exist. I would have snapped a pic of the officer who refused to identify himself and take the pic and the video straight to the media.
    1
  475. Moral of the story? Toyota drivers suck.
    1
  476.  @FlamingBasketballClub  Who cares about your opinion? They would have to prove she was speeding. As far as the LAW is concerned she had the legal right of way and was just driving along. It was up to the Subaru driver to just turn into the right most lane (when clear) and go along his way. Instead he cut through and got hit. Right of way is right of way, nothing supersedes that by definition of law.
    1
  477. 6:25 seriously eff that tow truck driver. Tow truck drivers are scumbags.
    1
  478. Well you have a dash cam so there's no need to get into it with the other driver. If they don't want to cooperate just call the police and DON'T disclose you have a dash cam. Let the other driver talk themselves into a catching another charge when they file a false report. I find myself not getting angry as much on the road anymore because I have a witness that will never be wrong, a dash cam.
    1
  479.  @natek7750  What is with people who are critical of other's comments? Why not follow your own advice there and move on then? You kind of shot yourself in the foot there.
    1
  480.  @bigdog8820  It's not a matter of luck. It's a matter of law. I drive within the law and make no exceptions. If I have the right of way I do not give it up.
    1
  481.  @bigdog8820  Driving within the law is oblivious?
    1
  482. Clip 3 nice camera quality.
    1
  483.  @hanswangnstvold435  It's not Tesla hate as much as it's logical thinking. A purpose built dash cam by some cheap Chinese company does a better job at video quality, picking up on license plates and night time quality much better than that built in junk. If the backup camera is so good why not just invest the little extra money and make the dash cam better if you're going to equip the vehicle as such.
    1
  484.  @hanswangnstvold435  I'm well aware if you zoom in it will get more pixelated. I use a Vantrue 1440P dash cam in my car and it works brilliantly. Better than the built in Tesla crap.
    1
  485.  @hanswangnstvold435  They call it Tesla Dash cam.... You do pay for everything on a car. It's built into the price. My Vantrue camera does a better job than the Tesla cam and cost like $130.
    1
  486. Cammer had the legal right of way, not the pickup driver. It is, according to the law, the merging driver ensure it is safe to change lanes and merge. There is no obligation on the cammer to let the pickup driver in.
    1
  487. There is no law saying you have to let anyone in. Honda driver is at fault in every way. Let me cut you off next time... Just let me in.
    1
  488. Sounds like Beavis and Butthead in the last clip albeit a little higher pitched.
    1
  489. Sure, let people get away with dumb things. It will only empower them more so shutting them down once in a blue moon is great for both a laugh and teaching them a lesson.
    1
  490. They usually act all nice at the scene then lie to the cops or insurance. One time I got rear ended with about the same damage as in the video and of course everything was my fault and I was a raging maniac and I slammed on my brakes but the dash cam sorted everything out. I made sure to take them to court for all the false accusations, my deductible and whatever things insurance didn't cover. They learned their lesson.
    1
  491. Actually it would be Boss' as the word already has an "s" at the end.
    1
  492. Not written into the law. Merging driver has to yield.
    1
  493. Not in the eyes of the law.
    1
  494.  @martindlee3902  But then it would just enable people to be entitled. Drive within the law there will be 0 problems on our road.
    1
  495. 1:19 what's he all pissed off about? He caused the wreck.
    1
  496.  @scorped76  Or McKenzie
    1
  497. So if I took your legal right of way by cutting you off and putting you in danger you wouldn't get mad? According to traffic laws, regardless of State or Province, there is no legal obligation for somebody to let a merger in. It is their job to merge safely as per law.
    1
  498.  @peterwalker5865  You mentioned nothing about the left lane. Your comment was vague as hell.
    1
  499.  @mmats69  I've done it. Got a new car out of it.
    1
  500. 5:06 rumor has it he's still honking.
    1
  501. 3:29 considering you live in the GTA why would you even stop to help these idiots? They wanted to rage and fight each other so whatever the outcome is that's between them. I never get involved in crap like this because I'm not about to make the problems of 2 idiots become mine.
    1
  502. The last clip. Wow $3.12 a gallon for gas. It's double that where I live.
    1
  503. The first clip stand your grand buddy. Keep your vehicle right up on that bus so the traffic cheater can't get in.
    1
  504. Blinkers only show intent but it doesn't not indicate right of way. The legal right of way belongs to the cammer and the SUV drivr has to wait until it's clear to do so.
    1
  505. Something Liberal.
    1
  506. 1:26 that's a huge problem in Canada especially in Ontario. MOT is handing out trucker's licenses like candy and the end result is major crashes all over the province.
    1
  507. Zipper merge is a technique and not a law. The Fusion driver should have yielded, cammer had the legal right of way.
    1
  508. Man screw the Vato with his welfare baby in the back seat. If he's so concerned for the welfare baby then he should drive more safely. It wouldn't have been a bad thing had the cammer been armed.
    1
  509. People don't use "Their", "There" or "They're" correctly so I'm not shocked. Also "breaked" instead of "braked".
    1
  510.  @n_u001  How does one legally and clearly define an asshole? How does one legally define courtesy? They can't but one can define actions so people can drive within the law.
    1
  511. @Self Made Auto Missing the point but okay. The road is for everyone so people need to stop acting like they own it.
    1
  512. 1:51 well if the old guy didn't get out of the car I doubt he will ever feel shame for anything. Why didn't you report it?
    1
  513. 6:00 if you don't have a working horn then you're the idiot. That's considered a safety item like brakes, tires, suspension components and lights.
    1
  514.  @taylorlibby7642  Or the cammer is just driving within the law. I see no law saying there is legal obligation to let someone in.
    1
  515. Super expensive? Those C300s go for like $10k in good shape. Don't get hung up on badge, look at the age and mileage of a car. Also, they're designed to fold up because the crumple zones absorb the impact. The idea is keeping the occupants safe, not making sure the paint isn't scratched. That crumple zone bit doesn't apply to just German cars, all other cars do the same.
    1
  516. 0:57 unless you're emergency workers you have no legal right to direct traffic or to be performing recoveries. Also, why stop in the middle of the highway? Other people from behind will be doing highway speeds and you'll risk an accident.
    1
  517. Aren't there consequences for mistakes?
    1
  518. If you get out of your car to rage at someone you deserve bear spray to the face with the majority of it concentrated to your nose and eyes.
    1
  519. 6:52 Honda driver deserved it for hogging the left lane.
    1
  520. Right of way goes to the cammer in this case.
    1
  521.  @Gibbs-rq4yg  Indicators are simply that. They signal intent but doesn't mean they have the right of way.
    1
  522. 3:18 is probably going to be shared fault plus it's obvious as day when contact was made the cammer was trying hard to PIT the Civic.
    1
  523. The thing is the cammer has the right of way and the truck has to yield.
    1
  524. Hopefully the Jeep driver pulls a U turn in front of a semi. Let's see him keep up that energy when he gets pushed down the road.
    1
  525. Clip 5 further proves why everyone hates all motorcyclists and cyclist.
    1
  526. Zipper merging isn’t a law in Ontario
    1
  527. Imagine if you heard someone say "OWWW!" after the guy threw the rake and it landed.
    1
  528. 0:49 song name?
    1
  529. 5:19 honestly I would have t boned the shit out of that Jag just to teach the driver a lesson. Wouldn't have been my fault any way.
    1
  530. Not required by law. Pickup driver needs to yield.
    1
  531. Ok so let me run you off the road. Accept it. Your words.
    1
  532.  @paulcolbourne9112  Not true. If everyone follows the driving laws to a tee each and every time on the dot there would no crashes. A few accidents due to bad weather or a blowout or something yes but actual crashes wouldn't happen.
    1
  533.  @icecold9511  Yeah good luck proving that though. One time some idiot turned left in front of me. I could have stopped but I didn't and crashed into them. I got the insurance money and a new car out of it. It was their fault no matter what as I had the legal right of way. Right of way is right of way, there are 0 exceptions.
    1
  534.  @techenthusiast4542  But the laws reign supreme on the roads. IF everyone drives within the law there would be hardly any disagreements or crashes.
    1
  535.  @techenthusiast4542  Canada.
    1
  536.  @john2510  But who is more dangerous in that situation. The people driving at a faster speed (the majority in this case) or the one clown driving at a snail’s pace? I’d say the slow driver is the more dangerous one. If they equip their vehicle with winter tires and their vehicle is capable then there shouldn’t be an issue.
    1
  537.  @sarahmills7878  So does checking your blindspot. That applies to the Hyundai driver.
    1
  538. I'm all for standing my ground on the road but there's one exception... I don't screw with semis because right or wrong I will lose against them in my 3500lb car.
    1
  539.  @305dadecountyy  Driving laws state that the one merging has to yield. Toyota driver should yield to the cammer.
    1
  540.  @donnash5813  The car was leaking fluids and the whole front end was smashed up. Fender bender?
    1
  541.  @ladyb1777  Admittedly it's hard for me to accept an apology because in situations warranting an apology I, and I'm sure others, feel like they've been wronged so badly that revenge is the only way to quash things. It's not a good thing but I feel like that's the mentality.
    1
  542. Who is "we"? I speak for myself and so do others. Don't speak on behalf of everyone else.
    1
  543. 7:51 would that be considered an African-British accent?
    1
  544. Man even Copwatch would look down on that fool. Cop watching is making they do their job properly, not being so biased that everything is somehow though of as being suspicious by the Officer. That dude recording is a total jerk and thankfully from the looks of it, everyone else thinks that too.
    1
  545. Holy crap did I ever rage at the first clip. What a total imbecile. Why did he pull out into the median? You don't do that on the best of days so why when a fire truck is doing an emergency run? Also, the cammer has to be the biggest narcissist, nobody is at fault for the crap he pulled.
    1
  546.  @JonMilochik  Yeah but what about cars that were going in the other direction. For your plan to work out you'd need to cop cars. The cop was positioned as he was for assisting on the opposite side of the road.
    1
  547. First clip I'd drive right up to that Lexus and just wait. Let her back up. The only crappy part is some simp would let her in. Nothing I hate more than some woman (and let's be honest her husband bought that Lexus) who thinks the rules don't apply to them then when confronted they play the victim.
    1
  548. She had the right of way.
    1
  549. Not really. The Fiat driver could have taken the next exit but wanted to cheat traffic, break the law by driving up on the bullnose and bully their way in. No way I'd let a cheater in, the law is on my side anyway.
    1
  550.  @jtdavis62  And any lawyer would overturn that in no time. I had that happen to me. Some idiot tried to merge into my lane because there was a crash up ahead and Police were on scene. Instead of the idiot changing his lane and going behind me he insists on bullying his way in. I didn't allow it because I know my laws and he ended up sideswiping me and rear ending the police cruiser. He was found at fault and my insurance tired to pin some blame on me but a lawyer took care of that. Right of way is right of way, there are no shades of grey there. Laws are clearly defined.
    1
  551. Not legally required. It’s the merger’s job to change lanes safely.
    1
  552.  @3030toby  I would not show my dash cam footage duh.
    1
  553.  @jmnimahelr  Not what sideview mirrors are for. They can partially cover your blind spot but that's what the shoulder check is for. If that were the case then why do newer cars come with blindspot monitoring? You can set the mirrors however you want but when that light flashes and you check your mirror you may not see the car that's occupying your blindspot but lo and behold it's there.
    1
  554.  @jmnimahelr  You missed the point of what I was saying. Even if their mirrors were set way out it wouldn't cover their blind spot. The blind spot is the blind spot regardless of mirror position. Do the shoulder check, it's required (by most places I'm sure) to pass the test. If you set your mirrors to, by whatever miracle, to cover your blind spot then you won't be able to use your mirrors to line up with a curb when parallel parking, reverse parking between 2 cars or seeing if a cyclist is coming in close proximity to my car. IF mirrors could be set so you can see everything then the term blind spot wouldn't exist.
    1
  555. Clip 3 so cyclists suck even as car drivers.
    1
  556. There is no legal obligation on the cammer to let the driver in. Merging laws clearly state that the one merging has to safely do so. The onus was on the Mazda driver.
    1
  557.  @brentfarvors192  That's what looking ahead is for. They can see other cars changing lanes so that should be an indicator the lane is ending or there is an obstruction up ahead. The cammer was not driving like an A hole. He was driving within the law.
    1
  558.  @solrackai1  Well that's sanctuary land Commiefornia. For the rest of the developed world the merger has to yield plain and simple.
    1
  559.  @deanscully5844  As I see it the cammer was speeding up to maintain the flow of traffic. Letting people off when they're being dumbasses when they put you in danger isn't being the bigger person. That whole thing is just one giant load of crap anyway. The following accident won't do much bad for me as my car is dirt cheap. My cheap car versus your overpriced bank owned car it will hit them far worse in the wallet.
    1
  560.  @brentfarvors192  It's debatable if it was dick move or not but that doesn't take away from the fact he did nothing LEGALLY wrong. What holds up in a court of law? What holds up in an insurance claim? Claiming someone was a dick or someone was actually following the laws as written within the traffic act?
    1
  561. 4:15 might be partial fault on the Explorer's part but majority will go to the turning SUV.
    1
  562. @muhammad altaf Yep. Probably wants to wreck it because he has Gap insurance and wants to purposely wreck to get the money back.
    1
  563.  @cockybastard1  That's your takeaway? The wrong way driver could have been in the other lane as well. How about people shouldn't drive on the wrong side of the road/highway? How about people not driving unsafely at all?
    1
  564. Cammer had the legal right of way. What is the cammer supposed to do? Slam on the brakes and get rear ended to be nice and let the trucker in? Everybody else was responsibly waiting in the lane so what was so important about the trucker needing to change lanes? One time some fool did that to me and I just ended up hitting them. I had dash cam proof, I got a big insurance payout and they got taught a lesson. Right of way is right of way and supersedes everything except yielding to emergency vehicles. Brush up on your law bud.
    1
  565. At 1:00 yeah I'll chime in. Your car has 2 new tires which means it has 2 shit tires so the front acted like a pivot point. I bet you got shit tires on there too because hydroplaning does not happen with good tires. I've been driving for 14 years and never as much slipped even though we get 4 proper seasons here. I work in the auto industry and see this crap all the time. If you get hurt for it I don't care but it's innocent people that get caught in the crossfire. That's where the issue starts.
    1
  566. Nobody cares what your opinion is. According to the law it clearly states that anyone merging has to yield. The pickup driver who threw a tantrum had to yield. There is NO legal obligation on the cammer to let anyone in by definition of law.
    1
  567.  @ElbowEyE  Law is the law. If I t bone someone who turned in front of me even if I can stop I still get off scot free and get the insurance money. Rewrite the laws then.
    1
  568. That's a good way to teach those entitled cut through drivers a lesson. In no way, shape or form does it come back to you.
    1
  569.  @kylestremick5108  Zipper merge is not written into law anywhere in North America. Driver changing lanes must yield which the Tesla driver didn't do.
    1
  570. First of all I'd report that idiot rager from Chicago because threatening people and trying to open the door is an arrestable offense. Just to see his loud mouth ass in cuffs would bring me joy.
    1
  571.  @GoDaddioTV  Why reward stupid people? Drive within the law. Laws have clearly defined actions and if you need to change lanes then you yield. Courtesy can't be clearly defined.
    1
  572.  @dismask  You're missing the principle of it. First is first plain and simple. Also, there are laws on the road if you didn't notice. Merging laws clearly state that the person wanting to enter the lane must yield to those who are already in the lane therefore the cammer had the clear legal right of way.
    1
  573.  @Captainllama  The laws are in place for efficient traffic flow. I don't see how slowing down and allowing a slower moving vehicle with a lane ending helps the flow of traffic. Cammer was in the right by definition of law and didn't have to break the momentum nor should he have to.
    1
  574.  @Captainllama  K
    1
  575.  @samhainnc9416  You like getting walked over I guess. The cammer has the right of way which supersedes everything else. With the terrible way the boat couple were behaving I get the vibe they behave like that a lot and get away with it. Thanks to the cammer, they were charged with multiple charges and hopefully they'll think twice about behaving stupid. Always defend your rights and always defend yourself if you're right. If you let someone get away with bad behavior then you're part of the problem, not the solution.
    1
  576. 7:27 while the Prius driver may have not been at fault it was still good karma. It also saved the cammer because it could have been them getting hit.
    1
  577. What car is the cammer driving in the first 2 clips?
    1
  578. The OHTA states whoever is merging has to yield to anyone in the lane they wish to get into. The Sprinter driver was the tool here and his actions after the fact are proof of it. There is no legal obligation to let anyone in and no reason for a driver to give up their legal right of way. Right of way supersedes everything else. Someone turned left in front of me. I just crashed into them since I had the right of way and they were atomically cited and found at fault. I got a new car out of it and paid 2 months off work.
    1
  579. What absolute POS that woman was. No insurance, tries to pull a scam and then has the audacity to sue a year later trying to recover money. If that doesn't stink of feminist privilege I don't know what else does. That's why when my car got hit (and it minor) I still reported it in case the other driver tried to pull some funny stuff.
    1
  580. Passenger. You can tell from the viewpoint.
    1
  581. Clip 1. Cammer should ask himself that question. I bet he felt so victorious beating that Civic which is just sad. What's even sadder is that women choose to stay with guys like this. Like girl, grow a little confidence and end it.
    1
  582. Cammer had the right of way though. The BMW shouldn't have jumped over that many lanes. Perhaps a damaged car and some injuries were the only thing that would teach that BMW driver a lesson.
    1
  583. 5:37 I don't blame the lady for freaking out as she had the legal right of way and the dumbass Subaru driver (which is all of them) was lippy about it. As for 0:51 the driver already in the lane has the legal right of way and the pickup driver is in the wrong. It's the pickup driver's responsibility to yield, not anyone's job to let them in.
    1
  584. 2:34 if you can't make out the license plate what makes you think we can especially after it's been uploaded to YT and been compressed.
    1
  585.  @Lolybelle009  And to make it worse I bet he barely got any jail time for it.
    1
  586. Damn the Subaru driver needs to go to jail. Like how distracted were they to crash that violently?
    1
  587. There is no legal obligation on the cammer to let the van in. Also, the van driver exiting his vehicle twice makes him the criminal.
    1
  588. Never rage in a company car.
    1
  589. "Hunk" the horn? Other than "honked" there's no other past tense for honking.
    1
  590. The thing is they have the right of way and the driver trying to force their way in are the problem. Why enable some dumbass who cant follow the rules? I don't let traffic cheaters in and I definitely don't let in those morons who wait until the lane ends and tries to bully their way in.
    1
  591.  @iamnid  So the ridiculous antics by the Taco driver was justified?
    1
  592. Clip 4 at 2:35 are people on this comment board fucking retarded? The cammer was cut off by that SUV going 5 mph and had a solid line to his left. He had no choice but to slow down. The person cutting him off is part of the problem and the driver who rear ended him is at fault. As for the cop, that cruiser was so poorly parked in a live lane of traffic for no good reason. Cammer is in no way, shape or form at fault. He was literally between a rock and a hard place.
    1
  593. Milwaukee Roundabout and 11' 8" have competition from the crappy Lexus driver.
    1
  594. 0:50 both of them are idiots. The cammer for passing on the right and the pickup driver for crossing a solid when changing lanes.
    1
  595.  @Lnr328  Yep. Those have the TT V8 motor. Pull like a train.
    1
  596. So the cammer in the first clip messed up in his driving then decides on wasting his fire extinguisher that he paid for with his own money? Brilliant.
    1
  597.  @isellstolenchainsaws  Fair enough.
    1
  598.  @Turbo_The_Femboy_Fox  Then that's on the shitty driver not the cammer.
    1
  599.  @Turbo_The_Femboy_Fox  So what's left to argue about? The truck was at fault and the cammer is within the law. Courtesy is too broad of an action to be defined and everyone's interpretation of it will be different thus why following the laws (which are clearly defined) is the top priority here.
    1
  600. Imagine getting pissed off and fighting over mediocre food.
    1
  601.  @luci-fer250  Still liable. They are responsible for their health and if they had a heart attack chances they knew they were at risk. What if one of your family members was badly hurt or killed in such a wreck because of the RV driver's negligence? Would you sound so smug?
    1
  602. First clip was hilarious. I wouldn't have let his ass in. Nothing better than triggering entitled people and because they're narcissists they will be pissed for the rest of the day.
    1
  603. That's an optional extra but given how Tesla drivers are they'll gladly pay.
    1
  604.  @larsharris  It's my paid for ex police vehicle with a giant push bar on the front versus someone's expensive bank owned vehicle should they choose to turn in front of me. Right of way is right of way as per law and again, the only other law that could supersede the legal right of way is yielding to emergency vehicles BUT they have to be responding to an active emergency and have their overheads and sirens on.
    1
  605. It happens though. We have an issue with people here in Toronto. Usually middle eastern people do something to make you stop then you get robbed.
    1
  606. He's smart to try it in a state where they don't really have guns. Had he tried this in a southern state he'd be dead.
    1
  607.  @donnash5813  That's a totally different story. The truck driver you dealt with was a nice person to begin with. Stop trying to rationalize, normalize and justify the pickup driver's behavior. I don't care what his situation was as he turned in front of the cammer and instead of backing up he and his wife decide to threaten, attack and vandalize the cammer's property. You give people the benefit of the doubt? That's a dumb thing to do. I always assume the worst and most of the time I'm right. I rather be wrong having assumed the worst than to assume good out of someone and they turned out to be assholes. There's being upstanding firm with you you act and then there's being passive. Passive never got anything accomplished. Oh and if the pickup driver was so good then why was he charged with 3 separate charges?
    1
  608. @Giada_De_Low_Rent_Tits And it would be thrown out in court. You just can't write up a ticket based on your feeling. You have to write up a ticket within the realm of the local traffic laws. The cammer had the right of way bar none. Right of way supersedes everything else except yielding to emergency vehicles, obeying traffic cops and construction workers with permits. Other than that right of way is right of way. Given how poorly the pickup driver and his wife behaved they are at complete fault from a driving standpoint plus they committed assault and vandalism. How are they in any way right?
    1
  609. People send it in.
    1
  610. I'd say the ones trying to bully their way in are the entitled ones.
    1
  611.  @brandonfranco9340  No I'm not. Right of way belongs to the driver already in the lane. It is the job of the other driver to yield. Zipper merge is written into some traffic codes but not many so what I mentioned above still stands. I could literally trade paint with someone who tries to bully their way in and I won't be in trouble because right of way supersedes everything else.
    1
  612. Get out of your car to rage at me? I'm taking your door clean off the hinges. Explain that one to your insurance that you were a raging asshole and the cammer felt they were in danger and took off.
    1
  613. The car drivers who cut truck drivers off are stupider than the deer who run across the road.
    1
  614.  @RoundShades  This was in 2008. I had a Toyota Corolla which had a 105 HP motor and a 3 speed automatic. I can’t, or won’t be pulling dumb moves like that.
    1
  615. 0:49. Sorry, hydroplaning on such light water isn't a thing. Hydroplaning is generally not a thing. Teslas, among other cars, have a very low center of gravity so they're very well planted to the ground. Driver is just a goof. I've been driving for 14 years and never hydroplaned once.
    1
  616. The funniest part is that Tesla owners argue on the forum that the Tesla Cam is better than any dash cam out there. 1990s Police car cameras look better.
    1
  617. 2:09 it's not just an accident. It's a major inconvenience for those who had their cars damaged and devalued plus if anyone was on the sidewalk they could have been run over. Both the driver and the passenger supposedly "teaching" them are a total liability. I'd be suing if I owned one of those cars that were damaged because of the lower resale value due to a claim.
    1
  618. Who else does NOT feel sorry for the cyclist? If they don't wish to get plates, insurance or pay taxes to maintain our roads but want to use them then if they meet up with 2 tons of steel I won't feel sorry for them.
    1
  619. The thing is by the time they got the drunk driver he probably claimed he started drinking after the crash. If they didn't find open bottles of beer or liquor in the car then they have no way of proving he was drunk at the time of the crash hence the other charge. IF the cammer had a rear facing camera the guy would have probably caught a more serious traffic infraction but it still wouldn't help with the drunk driving bit.
    1
  620.  @frankm8533  Excellent. I bet the guy in both your sister's and my scenario learned their lesson.
    1
  621. Well she should be more responsible and buy winter tires for her car.
    1
  622.  @paulcolbourne9112  Fair enough.
    1
  623. Not the law to let people in. It is their job to merge safely.
    1
  624. Uhh sorry buddy but I need proof.
    1
  625. 3:11 San Francisco is a total craphole and this video proves it even more. Poor drivers, high crime, a bunch of people who have no business being in the country and it's still expensive as heck to live there.
    1
  626. 0:45 then don't complain when illegals hurt and kill actual Americans.
    1
  627. Or drivers need to be safe around trucks and other vehicles. The issues seen here have nothing to do with the truckers.
    1
  628. Actually those have the 3800 V6 engine. Probably one of the best V6 motors built. The engine, however, is the only good thing on that GM.
    1
  629. Zipper merge is not a law. The law states that the one merging has to yield. In other words the Toyota driver's lane was ending therefore they should yield to the cammer. Cammer had the legal right of way.
    1
  630.  @MeerkatADV  Too hard to enforce.
    1
  631.  @thomashuynh1972  Right of way is right of way.
    1
  632. First clip was not luck. The driver was another GTI driving douchebag and the car's traction control saved the day.
    1
  633. The guy in the first video I wouldn't mind if he became a victim of someone crazier than him.
    1
  634. The cop was probably on the lookout for someone so they had to prioritize that over pulling a douche driver over.
    1
  635.  Bradley Thomsen  Sure why not. Not like it matters.
    1
  636. While I appreciate the cammer chasing down the hit and run driver he managed to get the car make and model wrong, had plenty of time to see and call out the plate when the rear of the car was in plain sight and then didn't realize what street he was on. Also, seeing that 911 didn't answer right away shows that the whole Liberal "Defunding" the police hasn't worked so well has it?
    1
  637.  @ladylily  Or they're just driving within the law.
    1
  638. Any one turning out of a parking lot has to yield to anyone coming. Cammer, although a little ragey, was in the right. Had he t boned the Sonata the Sonata driver would be at fault.
    1
  639.  @shayleibellew4309  According to most State driving laws when a turn is made it has to be in the closest lane. That was not done on the Sonata driver's part. You can disagree all you want. It's the law and the legal right of way that supersedes everything.
    1
  640. Yeah not sure why drivers feel because they have their signal on they think the world has to stop for them. It's merely signaling their intent, they must still yield.
    1
  641.  @donthompson7889  Sorry but if you nearly kill me you're getting the horn for a good minute.
    1
  642. No legal obligation to let someone in.
    1
  643.  @zayababy2  Nope. I just drive within the law.
    1
  644.  @beverlycrusher9713  You're right. Help no one trust no one.
    1
  645.  @beverlycrusher9713  You’re listing things that are not relevant to the conversation. We’re talking about a law here regarding merging. Nothing else.
    1
  646. You're the problem. Look into the traffic laws. Someone cutting you off is a violation and what message we sending if we just people get away with things? I guess if I see a pedo in the park doing pedo things I shouldn't report it? I mean I'm alive after all right?
    1
  647. Well they probably don't kiss their mom because that would be weird. Not everywhere is Alabama.
    1
  648. Not how the law works. Cammer had all 4 wheels in the lane therefore they control the lane. Drivers, according to the law, who want to merge must yield.
    1
  649.  @williamtoose2453  It's all about the law. That took place in Toronto and nowhere in the OHTA does it say to let mergers in. It says that mergers must yield. Benz driver failed to yield and would be at fault.
    1
  650.  @williamtoose2453  We’re not talking about life. We’re talking about driving specifically and there are laws surrounding driving. If everyone follows them we all get home safely.
    1
  651.  @thomasprinsen1241  So the BMW that cut him off is innocent? Stop victim blaming...
    1
  652. I didn't have many issues in the Toronto snowstorm (AWD and winter tires) but it was pretty messy out there. The problem was that there were so many unprepared people that when the plows tried to go on the highway they couldn't do their job as there were too many stuck cars.
    1
  653. Read up on traffic laws. Car already in the lane has control of it, the lane changer must yield. By law the car driver is not at fault but insurance might find him partially at fault for not letting up. A good lawyer can clear that up though.
    1
  654.  @realise6  Read up on the traffic laws. Car driver has legal right of way.
    1
  655.  @durrrrl3435  Find me a law that says where anyone has to let someone in? There is no legal obligation to let a driver merge but there is a legal obligation for the merging driver to yield.
    1
  656.  @durrrrl3435  That won’t hold as much water as the yield law would. Right of way is a tough thing to argue against.
    1
  657.  @durrrrl3435  But there won't be since the cammer got out of there. Perhaps one of the 2 parties had a dash cam but it depends.
    1
  658. 2:13 Goes to show University doesn't mean shit. Clearly that woman is stupid as hell (and tried to assault the other driver she crashed into) and will soon possess a University degree.
    1
  659. What are you talking about? It was the Honda driver being a prick thinking that they should be let out of the plaza. Nobody is obligated to let his sorry ass in and he started the whole thing.
    1
  660.  @warsurplus  The thing is there is no legal obligation to let someone in.
    1
  661. With regards to the brake check one sure the Hyundai driver is in the wrong for brake checking but the cammer isn't any saint either. If the cammer didn't stoke the flames by flashing his lights (it served no purpose) that driver would have been on their merry way. Mess with the bull get the horns.
    1
  662. Why do so many people have shitty car horns?
    1
  663. So what do you suggest? He drive at 20 km/h and not overtake them because he has a solid line? The speed limit on those road are between 60 and 80. Those cyclists can move over.... They don't pay licensing fees for plates or insurance so they can move their asses over. As for Toronto's war on the car well right or wrong the car always wins since they are 2 tons. I cycle too, I keep it to the trails.
    1
  664. 9:29 if someone hits me and runs they're getting chased. Why don't cammers give chase?
    1
  665. Cammer has right of way. Merge zones don't give the merger the automatic right of way.
    1
  666. Not what the law states though. Signaling merely states intent but not right of way. Right of way belongs to the cammer.
    1
  667. The sad part is the kids of those crazy ass parents will also turn into the same monsters. Consequences for people who behave like that are too light.
    1
  668. Drunk drivers, distracted drivers and unlicensed drivers make mistakes? Should you let that go too?
    1
  669. That's what happened though considering the Infiniti driver changed another lane and sped off. If you put me in danger on the road in any way it IS personal.
    1
  670.  @always420blitzed  People get mad sometimes. Sometimes the horn is a great release.
    1
  671.  @MaxZomboni  Way to misunderstand what a zipper merge is. Zipper merging makes sense when a lane is ending and everyone leaves space to merge properly. Flying up to the very end of the lane and bullying your way in is not zipper merging. BTW there is zero legal obligation to let a driver from another lane into yours.
    1
  672. Happened to a guy driving a C7 Corvette. He lost his roof when I was right behind him on the highway. Thankfully it flew over my car and the landed on the road.
    1
  673.  @punchy77855  Oh it broke.
    1
  674. Jeez whatever happened to DJ Keemstar and the F@G?
    1
  675. Should be an automatic 5 years of jail time for those who commit hit and runs. If the victim is injured then 10+ years depending on severity.
    1
  676. That motorcyclist is beyond delusional. It's a wide service truck and the driver did NOT drift towards the lane divider. Hopefully the judge, if it goes to court, throw this nonsense out.
    1
  677. Clip 5 give me a break. That Highlander was barely speeding. That was a bored cop with revenue generation on their mind. Between them pulling people over for petty stuff and needlessly blocking off traffic when there is a collision they're pretty much useless when it comes to anything traffic related.
    1
  678. No he followed the law. The Fiat driver is a moron. Right of way is right of way.
    1
  679.  @laurawilliams9672  That doesn't matter. The law is the highest order in society. If right now we were in a court room would the "oh he should play nice and let the ass hat in" argument win or would citing the actual laws written in the traffic code win? You tell me.
    1
  680. I see 2 idiots in the first clip.
    1
  681. He has the legal right of way. It's required by law to merge safely.
    1
  682.  @michaelchen3765  Buddy Toronto is a shithole now. Remember diversity is our strength... Yeah how did that go?
    1
  683. 3:56 that Prius driver and lady would be getting the air horn so they can't hear each other. Like go pull into a parking space and chat or go have a coffee or something. Anywhere but a busy entrance.
    1
  684. What they mean is that if you swerve you may lose control and crash into another vehicle that didn't have anything to do with the initial issue.
    1
  685. The second you get out of your car to rage at someone else then you deserved to be run over or shot. Some dummy ran up to my door once so I opened it... Right into his face and then slammed it and sped off. Hopefully he learned his lesson. Someone needs to teach the Karen a lesson too.
    1
  686. 7:24 not shocked the criminals look the way they do.
    1
  687.  @Valley_view  I'm well aware of that but the Accord driver literally forced his way in. The driver who got hit is not an idiot because he's the victim in all of this.
    1
  688. He got cut off though.
    1
  689.  @compmanio36  I would also go on my way but I would lay on the horn and give her a little brake check. Coming to a dead stop on a live lane scares them and they learn.
    1
  690. I was hoping the truck would ram the van driver into oblivion when he brake checked the trucker in clip 1
    1
  691. First clip the clown is worried about his tire. He could have done a lot worse.
    1
  692.  @Acidpapst  Ummm merging laws say the cammer is right.
    1
  693.  @gador789  Well there is no clearly defined law saying you have to slow down if your lane is clear. There is, however, a clearly defined law where you have to yield to other drivers when turning out so that applies to the truck.
    1
  694.  @gador789  The lane is clear and the speed limit is posted so if there is no other impediments on the road then you do the speed stated by law. The truck driver is still at fault, not sure how you can't seem to figure that one out. Hopefully you don't work in insurance.
    1
  695. 0:41 yeah her life does not matter.
    1
  696. 2:32 that dumbass in the Tacoma keeps slamming it into P. Why is everyone using the breakdown lane?
    1
  697. That CRV driver would be getting a hefty lawsuit if I T Boned them. How did that work out?
    1
  698.  @kenbrown2808  I don't believe that. Blocking a road like that just stinks of entitlement and lack of awareness. If I took away your legal right of way on the road and blocked you from getting where you needed to be you'd be upset too. Better yet let me brake check you. Don't get "spun up" about it though.
    1
  699.  @kenbrown2808  If an ambulance had to get in there and she kept chatting what would be your tone then?
    1
  700.  @kenbrown2808  I never said that. I presented a scenario where the woman does not move despite someone desperately in need of an ambulance and the only way through is where she's blocking because she's a self centered little you know what.
    1
  701.  @kenbrown2808  If everyone drove like me (within the law) there would be almost 0 collisions and no congestion. People like her (completely oblivious and self centered) are the ones who don’t move out of the way for emergency vehicles.
    1
  702.  @kenbrown2808  What are you on about? This stems from something simple. A woman is blocking a roadway. Personality aside she’s breaking the law. Also, why subject other people, who may be going to the doctor or a meeting, to being delayed because she wants to chat with some friends? Common sense would say to park somewhere else then chat away. The world shouldn’t have to wait on someone else. It’s not all about them, a public road is for everyone therefore it needs to move. Simple as that. Good for you that you don’t get mad at stuff like that. People value their time. Let me ask you one thing. If she sat there for 15 minutes and you happened to be the cammer what would you do? I’m curious.
    1
  703.  @kenbrown2808  Again, public roads for everybody whether they're in a rush or not. If she makes the road her own personal road, and makes it all about her then it'll piss off everyone else. It's not fair at all what she did and she'd be in for a world of hurt in places like NYC or anywhere in big city Texas. Only self centered people who have never been told no their entire life do nonsense like this. Anyone with any common sense wouldn't be this stupid.
    1
  704. Clip 2 why even bother engaging in conversation with a pissed off driver? They're so irrational in their reaction what makes you think they'll have a casual conversation? I would keep driving although if I'm feeling mischievous I would let her get out of her car and I'd slowly drive away and taunt making her chase after me on foot.
    1
  705. If anyone will behave that stupid they deserve the ridicule. It's drivers like that that end up killing innocent people so good that they only hurt themselves in this moment.
    1
  706. 4:06 if anyone needed to be shot on sight it's that fool. Too bad Oregon is a Liberal shithole where "gUnZ ArE BaAaAD".
    1
  707. 6:17 seems to be common with female drivers. Running off and not taking responsibility. They think their female card will get them out of trouble but a dash cam NEVER lies.
    1
  708. The first clip might be one of the best I've seen. Not sure if the cammer did it or not but I would have gotten the contact info for the 2 that got hit and send them the dash cam footage so they could screw over the Prius' insurance rates.
    1
  709. 2:50 I don't care about you or your wife. Did you own up to your screw up and pay the home owner for a new tree?
    1
  710.  @kenbrown2808  I fully said that.
    1
  711. Learn how traffic laws work. Whoever is already in the lane has right of way and anyone wanting to change lanes must yield. Had a collision occur the cammer would not be at fault.
    1
  712.  @DigiPal  Courtesy will have different meanings to different people. Traffic laws are clearly defined however and the law does state that the one changing lanes must yield. If the Fusion driver wanted to get over so badly why not get over earlier? They felt entitled enough to bore in at the last second. Sure things got a little escalated afterwards but there's no disputing that the law clearly states that the lane changer must yield.
    1
  713. One time a guy was raging at me and kept saying "FUCK YOU FUCK YOU!" the whole time. I simply rolled down my window and said "No thank you" and kept going. He was dumbfounded about how to respond so he just yelled "FUCK YOU FUCK YOU!" louder and eventually sped away.
    1
  714. With regards to the first clip. I would have pushed to file a report and go through insurance just to make it a strike 1 on the lady's insurance. These idiots won't learn until they get hit in their wallet.
    1
  715. 5:50 sorry buddy but it's obvious as day that you purposely caused that crash. Sure the Suburban driver didn't come to a complete stop but not only is it obvious as day you stepped on the gas you also steered to the left. I'm willing to bet you gave the cops a hard time based on your dramatic explanation and I'm sure you showed them the video and I'm glad they saw through your bullshit. Lakeville Police should be commended here.
    1
  716. The semi driver's left front tire was about to hit the line so he corrected back to maintain his lane. You do realize that the Tahoe driver cut the semi off right? You do realize that dash cams make things appear farther away when in reality the objects are much closer right? The Tahoe driver is 100% at fault here. What was the semi driver to do? Keep drifting over into the dirt median? Whoever has all of their wheels in the lane legally controls it.
    1
  717.  @glennsmusicchannel  If you are willing to let that be would you let a reckless or drunk driver go about their day too? Should be par for any drive right? Right of way is right of way, cammer had all of it by definition of law.
    1
  718. I would have believed the cammer in the first clip if he let off the gas and got in line with everyone else. Instead, he keeps the throttle pegged, crosses the bullnose and keeps hammering it in the passing lane going way above the speed limit.
    1
  719. So if someone cut you off and caused you to almost wreck or wreck fully it should be forgiven?
    1
  720.  @kpcasey  Yeah with a shitty CVT transmission too.
    1
  721. First cammer is a tard and so are the gullible people who accept that lousy statement from the cammer. Only one way to run a red. They were distracted which is against the law. Idiot for sure.
    1
  722. Yeah but in Liberal craphole Seattle the police are basically neutered and can't do anything without ACAB, BLM their Liberal mayor or any other special interest groups getting involved.
    1
  723. 0:56 was satisfying as hell. Just because you have your signal on does not mean you have the automatic right of way. It simply shows intent. The cammer had the legal right of way here.
    1
  724. 2:18 he seems in a rush but suddenly has time to rage about dumb shit.
    1
  725.  @stainlesssteellemming  Uhhh I’ll get paid out for my “injuries” which will equal a much nicer car in the end.
    1
  726.  @stainlesssteellemming  I wouldn’t cause the crash. The other driver will and I might dip my hand into the candy jar a few times.
    1
  727.  @stainlesssteellemming  Try proving that in court. Right of way almost always holds up.
    1
  728. According to Texas traffic code anyone who is already in the lane has control of it. It's the job of the person changing lanes to yield, not the cammer's job to let them in. Basically if he didn't move and they hit it would be the other driver's fault. He was trying not to get rear ended by the driver behind him and had to keep momentum going.
    1
  729. 4 cylinder models have a stock option but hard to find.
    1
  730. 5:15 no you need to help your damn self. Funny how I, as a Canadian, never had these issues. I won't help someone stupid enough to crash. The audacity you have to ask someone for help instead of calling a tow truck.
    1
  731.  @AleySoundz  Opinion versus law are 2 very different things. The car merging has to yield. Cammer has full 100% right of way.
    1
  732.  @ILOVEmyLord2024  Still does not justify getting out of your vehicle. That can be seen as a threat.
    1
  733.  @Captainllama  Looks like I got a fan ;)
    1
  734. I'll never understand why Tesla drivers would rather engage with an asshole driver. You have an insanely fast car. Just get out of there and put distance between you and the rager. It won't hurt your precious battery and yeah you'll lose some charge but that's better than getting into it with some clown.
    1
  735. @anidiotmakesthings Throwing a tantrum or following the law? There is no legal obligation to let people in.
    1
  736. 0:14 for any dumbass thinking that driver assistance tech is necessary look at how well that Avalanche driver reacted with his own reflexes. It takes skill, not a machine to make good maneuvers on the road. Don't depend on that stuff. Just keep your vehicle maintained and safe (tires, brakes etc...) and learn to drive defensively.
    1
  737. With regards to the first clip I almost thought the cammer's brights were connected to his horn.
    1
  738. 2:09 why was the Jeep driver lucky you weren't on your phone? Is it because you would be distracted? What the Jeep did was wrong but I don't understand what you said there.
    1
  739. The CRV driver needs a good driving suspension. As for the cammer in that situation they should have put as much distance between the CRV and them by either gradually and safely slowing down or speeding up. Some clown in a Chevy Spark of all things was doing the same thing to me. I just floored it and got away from him, it's not like his 3 cylinder powered basket was going to catch me.
    1
  740. The pickup driver manage to diffuse the situation correctly. Since when did Americans start hating guns and loving communism? You can be a pacifist if you want but those two dumbasses scrambled quick and will think twice about messing with someone ever again.
    1
  741. Nice to see how easily you are swayed with lies. There is only ONE way this happened. He was distracted. He should lose his license. Let's expand this mentality to murderers. They're really sorry they committed the murder. Should we let them off? Look at how many people get hurt and lose their lives on the road. Why should we let any dangerous driver off the hook when it's 100% possible to be a perfect driver?
    1
  742.  @TrekkerMoto  Okay so if he t boned and hurt/killed someone should his apology be enough? BTW I've driven for 15 years and about 300,000 miles with not a single ticket, accident or mistake. The one time I did something silly was on my own driveway where I knocked over my recycling bins but that does not cause a loss of life. The cammer's actions do.
    1
  743. Wrong. The cammer was correcting the trajectory of his vehicle because had he gone to the left any more he would have clipped the curb. The Escape driver is 100% at fault for a poor lane change. Cammer had the legal right of way and that supersedes everything except yielding to emergency vehicles.
    1
  744.  @all4mobilegaming157  Wide angle lenses make it seem that way but usually things look farther away when in reality they are not. The SUV driver cut across a solid line and did not check his blind spot. Given the way he cut in front of the cammer it can be argued that the SUV driver was trying to cause an accident as much as the cammer except the SUV driver was in the wrong here.
    1
  745. For the people getting mad at the cammer in the first clip please realize that the cammer has the legal right of way which supersedes everything else. The Tesla driver and anyone else who does that would be 100% at fault bar none. I hate entitled drivers that think their signal or an ending lane equals right of way.
    1
  746. As long as they act within the law there is no issue. If some idiot wants to get into my lane and feels their signal entitles them to come over I will let them hit my car. It's my old car versus their new bank owned car plus I have a camera to prove it.
    1
  747. 5:21 wow 3 hours to show up to a crash call. I bet if you said you will hurt the other driver suddenly 5 cop cars will come flying to the scene.
    1
  748. The van driver must yield. No legal obligation on the cammer's part.
    1
  749. 6:32 don't try to pin the blame on anyone. That's 100% on you. If you looked in both your rearview and sideview mirror you would have picked up on the Police cruiser coming in on your left. The Jeep pulled over as per law and you violated the law so how are you innocent in this? If I were the cop you'd get a citation and I'd have your vehicle towed as it's now part of an investigation to see if you did this on purpose or not because very conveniently you turned RIGHT as the cop passed. Obstruction of justice? That'll teach you some personal responsibility.
    1
  750. In the first clip it's both funny and sad at the same time. Funny at their hopped up druggie reaction but sad that they're so uneducated, shallow and that their vote counts as much as mine.
    1
  751. The guy in the Benz in the first clip would get a nice can of bear spray to the face. Being slightly upset at what happened is understandable but getting that enraged to the point that he follows the cammer, gets out of his car and approaches him in a threatening manner? Yeah, that can would be emptied.
    1
  752. Because You Tube requires it to look like a news report otherwise the channel gets demonetized.
    1
  753.  @englishmanscastle-4  They haven't been flagged or notified by YouTube as of yet. All of the channels doing this have unfortunately been threatened with demonetization so they had to go this route indefinitely. Again, this is a You Tube thing and it's common knowledge.
    1
  754. 3:07 if you had winter tires on you wouldn't have that issue. What is it with BC residents being so stupid?
    1
  755. The raging drivers are always in a rush but suddenly have time to stick around and argue/fight.
    1
  756. I love Milwaukee Roundabout. It's like the funnier version of 11 ft 8.
    1
  757. 2:12 IDC what excuse you come up with you fully cut off that Honda driver. Who can blame them for getting mad?
    1
  758. It's more about the law than ego. Anyone wanting to change lanes must yield according to the law. Should a crash occur it will be them at fault for failing to yield. Why give up your right of way?
    1
  759.  @coen071993  It would still be the fault of the other driver. They gotta learn somehow.
    1
  760. GM Stabilitrak kicking in to apply the brakes to individual wheels so it doesn't lose control.
    1
  761. The cammer was driving within the law. The Taco driver? He failed to yield and used his vehicle in a dangerous manner afterwards. This is 100% on him.
    1
  762. Song starting at 1:01. Feel like I heard it before but can't quite put my finger on it.
    1
  763. 5:23 they deserve to be T Boned. It'll be my old car versus their bank owned overpriced POS and I'm sure they'll love the lost value on their car since it now has an accident repair damage claim.
    1
  764. Are you dumb? Read up on traffic laws. Drivers making a left turn need to yield to traffic.
    1
  765.  @brentelledge2869  I'd crash into the trailer. Claim the insurance money.
    1
  766.  @n_u001  I'm bringing it up because people think that others should be courteous when there's no way to define. Specific actions relating to making a safe merge can be legally defined though. People need to drive within the law, nowhere does it say to be nice.
    1
  767.  @tudorjason  Not in the law.
    1
  768.  @n_u001  I help people in need, walk on the right and hold the door. On the road, however, I follow the rules to a tee and that's what kept me safe for the past 15 years and 700,000kms of driving. I follow the law on the road plain and simple and if everyone else does there will be almost 0 crashes. The issue here isn't the cammer being inconsiderate but the truck driver creating a dangerous situation. The van driver realized his mistakes.
    1
  769. Zipper merge is NOT a law and merely a technique. Traffic codes state that the vehicle wanting to change lanes must yield. Pickup driver should have waited.
    1
  770. The first clip the cammer handled it very well. That asshat in the Volvo should be reported for his stupid little stunt. He wasted everybody's time trying to make it about him and he cause the inconvenience in the first place.
    1
  771. I don't blame the MB driver for being pissed in the first clip as he occupied the lane and it's up to anyone else wanting to get into that lane to yield but the second you get out of your car to confront them in anger you're no longer in the right.
    1
  772. 1:00 That guy moved like greased lightning to save the van.
    1
  773.  @georgespalding7640  People have died from complications brought on by a regular rhinovirus or flu especially if it turned into pneumonia. This has happened every year humans existed, not just since 2020 so while it's sad that people died from complications brought on by COVID the other 99.7% recovered. Also, look at it in the context I wrote the comment in. The guy declined a rental car because it might have COVID germs in there. I mean some Lysol spray and some cleaning would take care of that.
    1
  774. Teslas aren't expensive. The majority of them rolling around are base Model 3s with the standard range battery and 1 motor.
    1
  775. They are honking at stupid drivers
    1
  776. Ambulance had their lights and sirens on. It's in the law that all vehicles must yield to emergency vehicles
    1
  777. It gets annoying to locals when outsiders don't respect and trash the place. That's why there's that animosity. I noticed that when I visited Hawaii. Tourists kept pissing off the locals and one guy who was on my flight going to Hawaii was brutally beaten by a surf gang. People need to learn the "when in Rome" mentality and respect the local area.
    1
  778.  @BrilloBush  Last clip.
    1
  779.  @Greydawg  If I'm going to get inconvenienced I'll make sure my horn affects everyone around me. That'll set everyone straight especially since I got 4 Hella Supertones on my car.
    1
  780.  @Greydawg  They should have been better drivers from day one otherwise they shouldn't be driving... Like the Lady holding up the road and getting honked at.
    1
  781. Real tough guys with their guns and a Honda Fit and bright red nonetheless. Lock these losers up.
    1
  782. 3:55 I would have brake checked that Subaru as revenge. They would have spun out.
    1
  783. Or the cammers are following the law to a tee and not letting other people be assholes. Cammers have done nothing wrong other than get pushed around by bad drivers. No more.
    1
  784.  @ineedbigdrink8509  Insurance would definitely try to argue that but it can be appealed. As for the driving laws the merger would be at fault. Happened to my Uncle before. He ended up pitting the merger and they hit 3 other cars. He had a dash cam and it ruled out any wrong doing. He held his ground and had the legal right of way.
    1
  785. 2:09 the crash is whatever but what the heck are the noises coming out of the cammer?
    1
  786. The second I see any mashed up car around me I steer clear. They obviously don't care about the state of their car so they'll care even less about yours.
    1
  787.  @bernds6587  It's got nothing to do with ego but everything to do with fairness. Why is everything in life on the people who do good and the ones who do bad get a free pass? Screw the entitled SUV driver, we can trade paint. Right of way is right of way. If I follow the law, they should too.
    1
  788.  @avega2792  Guess you live a perfect life huh?
    1
  789.  @jjjacer  Then perhaps maintain your car. Like I said cars do not give trouble out of the blue. It's usually a defect or lack of maintenance. I've owned German cars (not the best track record for reliability) and they have never failed on me but that's because I maintain it. I can give you tips on how to maintain your car as I've worked in the car industry for 10 years and don't worry I can dumb it down so any retard can understand.
    1
  790.  @bswitza  It seems to me you're the one with the ego here because you're trying desperately to prove your point (Hint: People will forget about the comment section in a few minutes so calm your tits). I get it the car turning right should have stopped and then made the right turn and yes, the cammer had a protected green but in Minnesota (The rule is State dependent) you need to stay in the left most lane when making a left turn. 2 wrongs here were committed and the cammer's reaction was OTT. He could have been having a bad day or he's just a major douche. I pick the latter because at the end of the day we're all adults here.
    1
  791. For anyone saying the cammer should let people in like in clip 2 just remember that traffic laws dictate that the one merging has to yield. In this case the Toyota driver has to yield to the cammer as the cammer has the legal right of way. Right of way is right of way, no ifs, ands or buts.
    1
  792. Not all dash cams have that feature
    1
  793.  @d1vin1ty  Zipper merging is not written into any law regarding driving. It is merely a technique and a suggestion with no real merit. The laws clearly state the legal right of way. Of course insurance is bound by law. If it weren't then they wouldn't know who to fault. I had an issue like this where an entitled traffic cheating driver wanted to wait until the last second to merge and I was right next to them. I held my speed, as required by law, and the other driver ended up hitting my car. I had dash cam footage and despite the other driver's statement and false claim my footage proved that they were at fault. They referred to the merging laws and concluded the other driver was at fault. Merge earlier, bar none.
    1
  794. Cammer in the first clip was in the right. They have control of the lane and the merging truck and van have to yield to him. Why did they want to change lanes anyway? Their lane was not ending. Trucker would have been at fault had they hit. Drive within the law, courtesy can't be clearly defined but specific actions outlined in our driving laws are. If everyone drives within the law there will be no issues and as for anyone saying "zipper merge" well that's merely a technique but not a law.
    1
  795.  @S.Roth94  Well if you have to slow down and put other people in danger on the road you shouldn't be driving. Drive the speed limit even in deep snow. I have AWD and winter tires so why should I be delayed by some other person who doesn't care. The law says drive the speed limit.
    1
  796. I know women will disagree with me because of feminism but why is it there are so many women that think they can behave the way they do and think there are no consequences? Why does society always favor the woman instead of the man?
    1
  797. Because they were on a lunch brake.
    1
  798. Are viewers that ignorant on this comment board? With regards to the first clip the cammer was in the right. They had the right of way and there is no legal obligation to let some late merge asshole in especially one who will cause momentum to be broken and wanting to merge over the solid line.
    1
  799. 1:37 honestly I'd just crash into someone who does that especially if I have an old car. It's automatically their fault and it means a new car for you plus they learn the hard way when their new bank owned car is now worth less due to the crash claim.
    1
  800. For the clip that starts at 4:20 what did any of that accomplish? Cammer is calling out the pickup driver but as far as I'm concerned the cammer is an even bigger tard. This, along with that crazy teacher who locked her kid suffering from COVID in the trunk, is the degradation of American society.
    1
  801. That's the Stabilitrak kicking in. It applies the brakes to help control a slide.
    1
  802.  Daniel Drader  They tend to be hesitant to show up but simply tell the dispatcher you think the other driver is drunk and that there's debris all over the road. They'll show up then.
    1
  803. 3:05 I'd drive at just the right speed to make that guy chase me and hopefully when he gasses out or suddenly realizes he's 2 blocks away from his car that will be hilarious.
    1
  804. First clip the cammer is the kind of driver that will eventually end up injuring or killing someone innocent.
    1
  805. Why do females never take responsibility when they cause a crash? Sorry hun, thanks to the dash cam your privilege won't come into play today.
    1
  806. Yeah I got bear spray in my car should this ever happen. They'll learn their lesson and it gives me a window of time to get the heck out of there.
    1
  807. 1:00 so he's driving like he's in a rush but suddenly has all the time in the world to rage? That, along with many other behaviors on the road, I will NEVER understand.
    1