Youtube comments of Happy Melon (@happymelon7129).

  1. 3200
  2. 3000
  3. 2500
  4. 2000
  5. 1600
  6. 1500
  7. 1500
  8. 1400
  9. 1400
  10. 1300
  11. 1200
  12. Thirty years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to SOVIET . The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    1100
  13. 1000
  14. 1000
  15. 904
  16. 779
  17. 744
  18. 726
  19. 688
  20. 677
  21. 675
  22. 667
  23. 656
  24. 620
  25. 611
  26. 576
  27. 569
  28. 555
  29. 552
  30. 550
  31. 546
  32. 540
  33. 521
  34. 504
  35. 473
  36. 467
  37. 453
  38. 446
  39. 437
  40. 430
  41. 419
  42. 417
  43. 405
  44. 404
  45. 398
  46. 379
  47. 375
  48. 369
  49. 367
  50. 364
  51. 363
  52. 351
  53. 340
  54. 338
  55. 335
  56. 330
  57. 322
  58. 316
  59. 315
  60. 311
  61. 310
  62. 305
  63. 292
  64. 270
  65. 256
  66. 253
  67. 252
  68. 251
  69. 251
  70. 246
  71. 245
  72. 244
  73. 243
  74. 243
  75. 237
  76. 234
  77. 231
  78. 229
  79. 225
  80. 222
  81. 222
  82. 221
  83. 221
  84. 220
  85. 218
  86. 216
  87. 211
  88. 210
  89. 208
  90. 206
  91. 200
  92. 198
  93. 197
  94. 195
  95. 189
  96. 187
  97. 186
  98. 185
  99. 185
  100. 184
  101. 184
  102. 183
  103. 182
  104. 179
  105. 179
  106. 179
  107. 178
  108. 174
  109. 173
  110. 173
  111. 171
  112. 169
  113. 169
  114. 167
  115. 165
  116. 164
  117. 161
  118. 161
  119. 160
  120. 160
  121. 156
  122. 156
  123. 154
  124. 154
  125. 153
  126. 153
  127. 151
  128. 151
  129. 150
  130. 150
  131. 149
  132. 149
  133. 148
  134. 148
  135. 147
  136. 146
  137. 142
  138. 142
  139. 140
  140. 140
  141. 138
  142. 137
  143. 137
  144. 134
  145. 133
  146. 132
  147. 132
  148. 131
  149. 130
  150. 130
  151. 130
  152. 127
  153. 127
  154. 126
  155. 126
  156. 125
  157. 124
  158. 124
  159. 123
  160. 121
  161. 121
  162. 120
  163. 120
  164. 120
  165. 119
  166. 119
  167. 119
  168. 119
  169. 119
  170. 118
  171. 118
  172. 117
  173. 116
  174. 115
  175. 115
  176. 113
  177. 111
  178. 111
  179. 110
  180. 109
  181. 109
  182. 109
  183. 108
  184. 108
  185. 108
  186. 106
  187. 106
  188. 105
  189. 103
  190. 103
  191. 103
  192. 103
  193. 102
  194. 102
  195. 100
  196. 99
  197. 99
  198. 99
  199. 98
  200. 98
  201. 97
  202. 97
  203. 96
  204. 95
  205. 95
  206. 95
  207. 95
  208. 94
  209. 94
  210. 94
  211. 93
  212. 93
  213. 93
  214. 93
  215. 92
  216. 91
  217. 91
  218. 90
  219. 90
  220. 90
  221. 89
  222. 89
  223. 89
  224. 88
  225. 88
  226. 88
  227. 88
  228. 88
  229. Thirty years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to Russia. The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    88
  230. 88
  231. 87
  232. 87
  233. 87
  234. 86
  235. 86
  236. 86
  237. 85
  238. 85
  239. 85
  240. 84
  241. 84
  242. 84
  243. 84
  244. 84
  245. 83
  246. 83
  247. 83
  248. 83
  249. 83
  250. 82
  251. 82
  252. 81
  253. 81
  254. 81
  255. 81
  256. 80
  257. 80
  258. 80
  259. 80
  260. 79
  261. 79
  262. 78
  263. 78
  264. 78
  265. 78
  266. 78
  267. 77
  268. 77
  269. 77
  270. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    76
  271. 76
  272. 76
  273. 76
  274. 75
  275. 75
  276. 75
  277. 75
  278. 75
  279. 75
  280. 75
  281. 75
  282. 74
  283. 74
  284. 74
  285. 74
  286. 74
  287. 73
  288. 73
  289. 73
  290. 73
  291. 73
  292. 72
  293. 72
  294. 72
  295. 72
  296. 72
  297. 72
  298. 72
  299. 71
  300. 71
  301. 71
  302. 71
  303. 71
  304. 70
  305. 70
  306. 70
  307. 70
  308. 70
  309. 70
  310. 70
  311. 70
  312. 69
  313. 69
  314. 69
  315. 69
  316. 69
  317. 68
  318. 68
  319. 68
  320. 67
  321. 67
  322. 67
  323. 67
  324. 67
  325. 67
  326. 67
  327. 67
  328. 67
  329. 67
  330. 67
  331. 66
  332. 66
  333. 65
  334. 65
  335. 65
  336. 65
  337. 65
  338. 65
  339. 64
  340. Not only in Laos , happen everywhere also. As a tourist need to be careful . India See also: List of alcohol poisonings in India India has a thriving moonshine industry, and methanol-tainted batches have killed over 2,000 people in the last 3 decades, including: 1976: 100 people died in Gujarat. 1980: 44 died in Haryana 1981: 1981 Karnataka liquor deaths 1982: Vypeen alcohol poisonings 1986: 108 died in Gujarat. 1987: 200 died in Gujarat. 1988: 32 people died in Gujarat. 1992: 1992 Odisha liquor deaths 2001: 27 deaths in Bombay.[17] 2004: In December 2004, 87 people died in Mumbai.[18] 2006: 22 people killed in Ganjam district, Orissa. 2008: 2008 Karnataka-Tamil Nadu hooch tragedy 2009 27 people killed in Kolkata, West Bengal 29 people killed in Uttar Pradesh 2009 Gujarat alcohol poisonings >30 deaths, Delhi.[17] >30 deaths, Orissa Bolangir.[17] 2010 35 people killed in Ghaziabad and Bulandshahr districts, Uttar Pradesh 23 people killed in Malappuram district, Kerala 10 deaths, Uttar Pradesh.[17] 2011 17 dead in Andhra Pradesh, August.[19] Sangrampur methanol tragedy 2012 17 deaths, Andhra Pradesh.[17] 31 deaths, Orissa.[17] 18 people died in Gurdaspur district of Punjab in a possible methanol-poisoning incident. The Chemical Analyzer and Histo-pathology department took care of the bodies and will ascertain the exact cause of death.[20] 2013: 40 people died in Azamgarh district, Uttar Pradesh.[21] 2015: 2015 Mumbai alcohol poisoning incident 2017: On 3 January at least 6 people died at Ramgopalpur,[22] West Bengal 2019 In February 2019, 100 people in the northern states of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand died by drinking toxic alcohol.[23] 2019 Assam alcohol poisonings 2022: 2022 Gujarat alcohol poisoning 2024: 2024 Kallakurichi alcohol poisonings
    64
  341. 64
  342. 64
  343. 64
  344. 64
  345. 63
  346. 63
  347. 63
  348. 63
  349. 63
  350. 63
  351. 63
  352. 63
  353. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    63
  354. 63
  355. 63
  356. 63
  357. 62
  358. 62
  359. 62
  360. 62
  361. 62
  362. 62
  363. 62
  364. 62
  365. 62
  366. 61
  367. 61
  368. 61
  369. 61
  370. 61
  371. 61
  372. 61
  373. 61
  374. 61
  375. 60
  376. 60
  377. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    60
  378. 60
  379. 60
  380. 60
  381. 60
  382. 60
  383. 59
  384. 59
  385. 59
  386. 59
  387. 59
  388. 59
  389. 59
  390. 59
  391. 59
  392. 59
  393. 59
  394. 59
  395. 59
  396. 59
  397. 58
  398. 58
  399. 58
  400. 58
  401. 58
  402. 57
  403. 57
  404. 57
  405. 57
  406. 57
  407. 57
  408. 57
  409. 57
  410. 57
  411. 57
  412. 56
  413. 56
  414. 56
  415. 56
  416. 56
  417. 56
  418. 56
  419. 56
  420. 55
  421. 55
  422. 55
  423. 55
  424. 55
  425. 55
  426. 54
  427. 54
  428. 54
  429. 54
  430. 54
  431. 54
  432. 54
  433. 54
  434. 54
  435. 54
  436. 54
  437. 54
  438. 54
  439. 54
  440. 54
  441. 53
  442. 53
  443. 53
  444. 53
  445. 53
  446. 53
  447. 53
  448. 53
  449. 53
  450. 53
  451. 52
  452. 52
  453. 52
  454. 52
  455. 52
  456. 52
  457. 52
  458. 52
  459. 51
  460. 51
  461. 51
  462. 51
  463. 51
  464. 51
  465. 51
  466. 51
  467. 51
  468. 50
  469. 50
  470. 50
  471. 50
  472. 50
  473. 50
  474. 50
  475. 50
  476. 50
  477. 50
  478. 49
  479. 49
  480. 49
  481. 49
  482. 49
  483. 49
  484. 49
  485. 49
  486. 49
  487. 49
  488. 49
  489. 49
  490. 49
  491. 48
  492. 48
  493. 48
  494. 48
  495. 48
  496. 48
  497. 48
  498. 48
  499. 48
  500. 47
  501. 47
  502. 47
  503. 47
  504. 47
  505. 47
  506. 47
  507. 47
  508. 47
  509. 47
  510. 47
  511. 47
  512. 47
  513. 47
  514. 47
  515. 46
  516. 46
  517. 46
  518. 46
  519. 46
  520. 46
  521. 46
  522. 46
  523. 46
  524. 46
  525. 46
  526. 46
  527. 46
  528. 45
  529. 45
  530. 45
  531. 45
  532. 45
  533. 45
  534. 44
  535. 44
  536. 44
  537. 44
  538. 44
  539. 44
  540. 44
  541. 44
  542. 44
  543. 44
  544. 44
  545. 44
  546. 44
  547. 43
  548. 43
  549. 43
  550. 43
  551. 43
  552. 43
  553. 43
  554. 43
  555. 43
  556. 43
  557. 43
  558. 43
  559. 43
  560. 43
  561. 43
  562. 😅 Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    43
  563. 42
  564. 42
  565. 42
  566. 42
  567. 42
  568. 42
  569. 42
  570. 42
  571. 42
  572. 42
  573. 42
  574. 42
  575. 42
  576. 42
  577. 42
  578. 42
  579. 42
  580. 42
  581. 41
  582. 41
  583. 41
  584. 41
  585. 41
  586. 41
  587. 41
  588. 41
  589. 41
  590. 41
  591. 40
  592. 40
  593. 40
  594. 40
  595. 40
  596. 40
  597. 40
  598. 40
  599. 40
  600. 40
  601. 40
  602. 40
  603. 39
  604. 39
  605. 39
  606. 39
  607. 39
  608. 39
  609. 39
  610. 39
  611. 39
  612. 39
  613. 39
  614. 39
  615. 39
  616. 39
  617. 39
  618. 39
  619. 39
  620. 39
  621. 39
  622. 39
  623. 39
  624. 39
  625. 39
  626. 39
  627. 38
  628. 38
  629. 38
  630. 38
  631. 38
  632. 38
  633. 38
  634. 38
  635. 38
  636. 38
  637. 38
  638. 38
  639. 38
  640. 37
  641. 37
  642. 37
  643. 37
  644. 37
  645. 37
  646. 37
  647. 37
  648. 37
  649. 37
  650. 37
  651. 37
  652. 37
  653. 37
  654. 37
  655. 37
  656. 37
  657. 37
  658. 37
  659. 37
  660. 36
  661. 36
  662. 36
  663. 36
  664. 36
  665. 36
  666. 36
  667. 36
  668. 36
  669. 36
  670. 36
  671. 36
  672. 36
  673. 36
  674. 36
  675. 36
  676. 36
  677. 36
  678. 36
  679. 36
  680. 36
  681. 36
  682. 36
  683. 36
  684. 36
  685. 36
  686. 35
  687. 35
  688. 35
  689. 35
  690. 35
  691. 35
  692. 35
  693. 35
  694. 35
  695. 35
  696. 35
  697. 35
  698. 35
  699. 35
  700. 35
  701. 35
  702. 35
  703. 35
  704. 35
  705. 35
  706. 35
  707. 35
  708. 35
  709. 35
  710. 35
  711. 35
  712. 35
  713. 35
  714. 35
  715. 35
  716. 35
  717. 34
  718. 34
  719. 34
  720. 34
  721. 34
  722. 34
  723. 34
  724. 34
  725. 34
  726. 34
  727. 34
  728. 34
  729. 34
  730. 34
  731. 34
  732. 34
  733. 34
  734. 34
  735. 34
  736. 34
  737. 34
  738. 34
  739. 34
  740. 34
  741. 34
  742. 33
  743. 33
  744. 33
  745. 33
  746. 33
  747. 33
  748. 33
  749. 33
  750. 33
  751. 33
  752. 33
  753. 33
  754. 33
  755. 33
  756. 33
  757. 33
  758. 33
  759. 33
  760. 33
  761. 33
  762. 33
  763. 33
  764. 32
  765. 32
  766. 32
  767. 32
  768. 32
  769. 32
  770. 32
  771. 32
  772. 32
  773. 32
  774. 32
  775. 32
  776. 32
  777. 32
  778. 32
  779. 32
  780. 32
  781. 32
  782. 32
  783. 32
  784. 32
  785. 32
  786. 32
  787. 32
  788. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    32
  789. 31
  790. 31
  791. 31
  792. 31
  793. 31
  794. 31
  795. 31
  796. 31
  797. 31
  798. 31
  799. 31
  800. 31
  801. 31
  802. 31
  803. 31
  804. 31
  805. 31
  806. 31
  807. 31
  808. 31
  809. 31
  810. 31
  811. 31
  812. 31
  813. 31
  814. 31
  815. 31
  816. 31
  817. 31
  818. 31
  819. 31
  820. 31
  821. 31
  822. 31
  823. 31
  824. 31
  825. 31
  826. 31
  827. 31
  828. 30
  829. 30
  830. 30
  831. 30
  832. 30
  833. 30
  834. 30
  835. 30
  836. 30
  837. 30
  838. 30
  839. 30
  840. 30
  841. 30
  842. 30
  843. 30
  844. 30
  845. 30
  846. 30
  847. 30
  848. 30
  849. 30
  850. 30
  851. 30
  852. 30
  853. 30
  854. 30
  855. 30
  856. 30
  857. 30
  858. 30
  859. 30
  860. 30
  861. 30
  862. 30
  863. 30
  864. 30
  865. 30
  866. 30
  867. 30
  868. 30
  869. 29
  870. 29
  871. 29
  872. 29
  873. 29
  874. 29
  875. 29
  876. 29
  877. 29
  878. 29
  879. 29
  880. 29
  881. 29
  882. 29
  883. 29
  884. 29
  885. 29
  886. 29
  887. 29
  888. 29
  889. 29
  890. 29
  891. 29
  892. 29
  893. 29
  894. 29
  895. 29
  896. 29
  897. 29
  898. 29
  899. 29
  900. 29
  901. 29
  902. 29
  903. 29
  904. 29
  905. 29
  906. 29
  907. 29
  908. 28
  909. 28
  910. 28
  911. 28
  912. 28
  913. 28
  914. 28
  915. 28
  916. 28
  917. 28
  918. 28
  919. 28
  920. 28
  921. 28
  922. 28
  923. 28
  924. 28
  925. 28
  926. 28
  927. 28
  928. 28
  929. 28
  930. 28
  931. 28
  932. 28
  933. 28
  934. 27
  935. 27
  936. 27
  937. 27
  938. 27
  939. 27
  940. 27
  941. 27
  942. 27
  943. 27
  944. 27
  945. 27
  946. 27
  947. 27
  948. 27
  949. 27
  950. 27
  951. 27
  952. 27
  953. 27
  954. 27
  955. 27
  956. 27
  957. 27
  958. 27
  959. 27
  960. 27
  961. 27
  962. 27
  963. 27
  964. 26
  965. 26
  966. 26
  967. 26
  968. 26
  969. 26
  970. 26
  971. 26
  972. 26
  973. 26
  974. 26
  975. 26
  976. 26
  977. 26
  978. 26
  979. 26
  980. 26
  981. 26
  982. 26
  983. 26
  984. 26
  985. 26
  986. 26
  987. 26
  988. 26
  989. 26
  990. 26
  991. 26
  992. 26
  993. 26
  994. 26
  995. 26
  996. 26
  997. 26
  998. 26
  999. 26
  1000. 26
  1001. 26
  1002. 26
  1003. 26
  1004. 26
  1005. 26
  1006. 26
  1007. 26
  1008. 26
  1009. 26
  1010. Thirty +years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to Russia. The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    26
  1011. 26
  1012. 26
  1013. 26
  1014. 26
  1015. 26
  1016. 25
  1017. 25
  1018. 25
  1019. 25
  1020. 25
  1021. 25
  1022. 25
  1023. 25
  1024. 25
  1025. 25
  1026. 25
  1027. 25
  1028. 25
  1029. 25
  1030. 25
  1031. 25
  1032. 25
  1033. 25
  1034. 25
  1035. 25
  1036. 25
  1037. 25
  1038. 25
  1039. 25
  1040. 25
  1041. 25
  1042. 25
  1043. 25
  1044. 25
  1045. 25
  1046. 25
  1047. 25
  1048. 25
  1049. 25
  1050. 25
  1051. 25
  1052. 25
  1053. 25
  1054. 25
  1055. 24
  1056. 24
  1057. 24
  1058. 24
  1059. 24
  1060. 24
  1061. 24
  1062. 24
  1063. 24
  1064. 24
  1065. 24
  1066. 24
  1067. 24
  1068. 24
  1069. 24
  1070. 24
  1071. 24
  1072. 24
  1073. 24
  1074. 24
  1075. 24
  1076. 24
  1077. 24
  1078. 24
  1079. 24
  1080. 24
  1081. 24
  1082. 24
  1083. 24
  1084. 24
  1085. 24
  1086. 24
  1087. 24
  1088. 24
  1089. 24
  1090. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    24
  1091. 24
  1092. 24
  1093. 24
  1094. 24
  1095. 24
  1096. 24
  1097. 24
  1098. 24
  1099. 24
  1100. 24
  1101. 24
  1102. 24
  1103. 24
  1104. 24
  1105. 24
  1106. 24
  1107. 24
  1108. 24
  1109. 24
  1110. 23
  1111. 23
  1112. 23
  1113. 23
  1114. 23
  1115. 23
  1116. 23
  1117. 23
  1118. 23
  1119. 23
  1120. 23
  1121. 23
  1122. 23
  1123. 23
  1124. 23
  1125. 23
  1126. 23
  1127. 23
  1128. 23
  1129. 23
  1130. 23
  1131. 23
  1132. 23
  1133. 23
  1134. 23
  1135. 23
  1136. 23
  1137. 23
  1138. 23
  1139. 23
  1140. 23
  1141. 23
  1142. 23
  1143. 23
  1144. 23
  1145. 23
  1146. 23
  1147. 23
  1148. 23
  1149. 23
  1150. 23
  1151. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    23
  1152. 23
  1153. 23
  1154. 23
  1155. 23
  1156. 23
  1157. 23
  1158. 23
  1159. 23
  1160. 23
  1161. 23
  1162. 23
  1163. 23
  1164. 23
  1165. 23
  1166. 23
  1167. 23
  1168. 23
  1169. 23
  1170. 23
  1171. 23
  1172. 23
  1173. 23
  1174. 23
  1175. 23
  1176. 23
  1177. 23
  1178. 23
  1179. 23
  1180. 23
  1181. 23
  1182. 23
  1183. 23
  1184. 23
  1185. 23
  1186. 23
  1187. 23
  1188. 23
  1189. 23
  1190. 22
  1191. 22
  1192. 22
  1193. 22
  1194. 22
  1195. 22
  1196. 22
  1197. 22
  1198. 22
  1199. 22
  1200. 22
  1201. 22
  1202. 22
  1203. 22
  1204. 22
  1205. 22
  1206. 22
  1207. 22
  1208. 22
  1209. 22
  1210. 22
  1211. 22
  1212. 22
  1213. 22
  1214. 22
  1215. 22
  1216. 22
  1217. 22
  1218. 22
  1219. 22
  1220. 22
  1221. 22
  1222. 22
  1223. 22
  1224. 22
  1225. 22
  1226. 22
  1227. 22
  1228. 22
  1229. 22
  1230. 22
  1231. 22
  1232. 22
  1233. 22
  1234. 22
  1235. 22
  1236. 22
  1237. 22
  1238. 22
  1239. 22
  1240. 22
  1241. 22
  1242. 22
  1243. 22
  1244. 22
  1245. 22
  1246. 22
  1247. 22
  1248. 22
  1249. 22
  1250. 22
  1251. 22
  1252. 22
  1253. 22
  1254. 22
  1255. 21
  1256. 21
  1257. 21
  1258. 21
  1259. 21
  1260. 21
  1261. 21
  1262. 21
  1263. 21
  1264. 21
  1265. 21
  1266. 21
  1267. 21
  1268. 21
  1269. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    21
  1270. A statement from the Hong Kong spokesperson stated: First, the core essence of the Sino-British Joint Declaration is that China will resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong and does not give the UK the right to interfere in Hong Kong affairs after its return. The British side has no sovereignty, governance or supervision over Hong Kong after its return, and is not qualified to make irresponsible remarks on Hong Kong affairs. Second, the National Security Regulations for Hong Kong will not affect Hong Kong’s continued enjoyment of a high degree of autonomy in accordance with the Basic Law, nor will it detract from the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents. The crime is clearly defined and targets only a very small number of people who endanger national security. Law-abiding people do not have to worry about accidentally falling into the law. The normal activities of foreign institutions and personnel in Hong Kong are fully protected by law. Third, the Hong Kong National Security Regulations are a law to ensure security and development. It fully considers the need for Hong Kong to operate as an international financial, shipping and trade center and expand smooth and convenient international connections. It will not affect the normal development of business consultation, market research and other activities and the free flow of information. Instead, it will create a more stable and more stable environment for Hong Kong. A predictable business and development environment.
    21
  1271. 21
  1272. 21
  1273. 21
  1274. 21
  1275. 21
  1276. 21
  1277. 21
  1278. 21
  1279. 21
  1280. 21
  1281. 21
  1282. 21
  1283. 21
  1284. 21
  1285. 21
  1286. 21
  1287. 21
  1288. 21
  1289. 21
  1290. 21
  1291. 21
  1292. 21
  1293. 21
  1294. 21
  1295. 21
  1296. 21
  1297. 21
  1298. 21
  1299. 21
  1300. 21
  1301. 21
  1302. 21
  1303. 21
  1304. 21
  1305. 21
  1306. 21
  1307. 21
  1308. 21
  1309. 21
  1310. 21
  1311. 21
  1312. 21
  1313. 21
  1314. 21
  1315. 21
  1316. 21
  1317. 21
  1318. 21
  1319. 21
  1320. 21
  1321. 20
  1322. 20
  1323. 20
  1324. 20
  1325. 20
  1326. 20
  1327. 20
  1328. 20
  1329. 20
  1330. 20
  1331. 20
  1332. 20
  1333. 20
  1334. 20
  1335. 20
  1336. 20
  1337. 20
  1338. 20
  1339. 20
  1340. 20
  1341. 20
  1342. 20
  1343. 20
  1344. 20
  1345. 20
  1346. 20
  1347. 20
  1348. 20
  1349. 20
  1350. 20
  1351. 20
  1352. 20
  1353. 20
  1354. 20
  1355. 20
  1356. 20
  1357. 20
  1358. 20
  1359. 20
  1360. 20
  1361. 20
  1362. 20
  1363. 20
  1364. 20
  1365. 20
  1366. 20
  1367. 20
  1368. 20
  1369. 20
  1370. 20
  1371. 20
  1372. 20
  1373. 20
  1374. 20
  1375. 20
  1376. 20
  1377. 20
  1378. 20
  1379. 19
  1380. 19
  1381. 19
  1382. 19
  1383. 19
  1384. 19
  1385. 19
  1386. 19
  1387. 19
  1388. 19
  1389. 19
  1390. 19
  1391. 19
  1392. 19
  1393. 19
  1394. 19
  1395. 19
  1396. 19
  1397. 19
  1398. 19
  1399. 19
  1400. 19
  1401. 19
  1402. 19
  1403. 19
  1404. 19
  1405. 19
  1406. 19
  1407. 19
  1408. 19
  1409. 19
  1410. 19
  1411. 19
  1412. 19
  1413. 19
  1414. 19
  1415. 19
  1416. 19
  1417. 19
  1418. 19
  1419. 19
  1420. 19
  1421. 19
  1422. 19
  1423. 19
  1424. 19
  1425. 19
  1426. 19
  1427. 19
  1428. 19
  1429. 19
  1430. 19
  1431. 19
  1432. 19
  1433. 19
  1434. 19
  1435. 19
  1436. 19
  1437. 19
  1438. 19
  1439. 19
  1440. 😅 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    19
  1441. 19
  1442. 19
  1443. 19
  1444. 19
  1445. 19
  1446. 19
  1447. 19
  1448. 19
  1449. 19
  1450. 19
  1451. 19
  1452. 19
  1453. 19
  1454. 19
  1455. 19
  1456. 19
  1457. 19
  1458. 19
  1459. 19
  1460. 19
  1461. 19
  1462. 18
  1463. 18
  1464. 18
  1465. 18
  1466. 18
  1467. 18
  1468. 18
  1469. 18
  1470. 18
  1471. 18
  1472. 18
  1473. 18
  1474. 18
  1475. 18
  1476. 18
  1477. 18
  1478. 18
  1479. 18
  1480. 18
  1481. 18
  1482. 18
  1483. 18
  1484. 18
  1485. 18
  1486. 18
  1487. 18
  1488. 18
  1489. 18
  1490. 18
  1491. 18
  1492. 18
  1493. 18
  1494. 18
  1495. 18
  1496. 18
  1497. 18
  1498. 18
  1499. 18
  1500. 18
  1501. 18
  1502. 18
  1503. 18
  1504. 18
  1505. 18
  1506. 18
  1507. 18
  1508. 18
  1509. 18
  1510. Thirty years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to Russia. The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    18
  1511. 18
  1512. 18
  1513. 18
  1514. 18
  1515. 18
  1516. 18
  1517. 18
  1518. 18
  1519. 18
  1520. 18
  1521. 18
  1522. 18
  1523. 18
  1524. 18
  1525. 18
  1526. 18
  1527. 18
  1528. 18
  1529. 18
  1530. 18
  1531. 18
  1532. 18
  1533. 18
  1534. 18
  1535. 18
  1536. 18
  1537. 18
  1538. 18
  1539. 18
  1540. 18
  1541. 18
  1542. 18
  1543. 18
  1544. 18
  1545. 18
  1546. 18
  1547. 18
  1548. 18
  1549. 18
  1550. 18
  1551. 18
  1552. 18
  1553. 18
  1554. 18
  1555. 18
  1556. 18
  1557. 18
  1558. 18
  1559. 18
  1560. 18
  1561. 17
  1562. 17
  1563. 17
  1564. 17
  1565. 17
  1566. 17
  1567. 17
  1568. 17
  1569. 17
  1570. 17
  1571. 17
  1572. 17
  1573. 17
  1574. 17
  1575. 17
  1576. 17
  1577. 17
  1578. 17
  1579. 17
  1580. 17
  1581. 17
  1582. 17
  1583. 17
  1584. 17
  1585. 17
  1586. 17
  1587. 17
  1588. 17
  1589. 17
  1590. 17
  1591. 17
  1592. 17
  1593. 17
  1594. 17
  1595. 17
  1596. 17
  1597. 17
  1598. 17
  1599. 17
  1600. 17
  1601. 17
  1602. 17
  1603. 17
  1604. 17
  1605. 17
  1606. Lessons from Toshiba, Alstom: how US suppresses foreign rival companies to maintain tech hegemony Toshiba: 'national security threat' Japan's semiconductor industry was in full bloom in the 1980s with government support before it was ground down by the US. It had surpassed the US as the world's largest chip supplier, and its market share of DRAM (dynamic random access memory) products reached some 80 percent in 1987, according to a Los Angeles Times article in August 1992. Toshiba, Japan's leading chip producer at that time, was then targeted by the US over "national security concerns." After Toshiba and Norwegian military enterprise Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk, were found in 1986 to be secretly selling sophisticated milling machines to the Soviet Union, Washington issued a 2 to 5 year ban on all Toshiba Corporation products , saying the sale to the Soviet Union had posed a threat to US national security, and Toshiba had violated a Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom) agreement, which prohibited members from exporting advanced weapons or machines to the Soviet Union. Toshiba was reportedly severely hit by the scandal. Two of its managers were sent to jail and several senior executives resigned. The company spent some 100 million yen ($0.95 million) on advertising in almost all major US newspapers apologizing for its actions. The scandal ended up hurting its reputation and prestige it had established globally. Its many technical documents were also allegedly seized during a CIA investigation.
    17
  1607. 17
  1608. 17
  1609. 17
  1610. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    17
  1611. 17
  1612. 17
  1613. 17
  1614. 17
  1615. 17
  1616. 17
  1617. 17
  1618. 17
  1619. 17
  1620. 17
  1621. 17
  1622. 17
  1623. 17
  1624. 17
  1625. 17
  1626. 17
  1627. 17
  1628. 17
  1629. 17
  1630. 17
  1631. 17
  1632. 17
  1633. 17
  1634. 17
  1635. 17
  1636. 17
  1637. 17
  1638. 17
  1639. 17
  1640. 17
  1641. 17
  1642. 17
  1643. 17
  1644. 17
  1645. 17
  1646. 17
  1647. 17
  1648. 17
  1649. 17
  1650. 17
  1651. 17
  1652. 17
  1653. 17
  1654. 17
  1655. 17
  1656. 17
  1657. 17
  1658. 17
  1659. 17
  1660. 16
  1661. 16
  1662. 16
  1663. 16
  1664. 16
  1665. 16
  1666. 16
  1667. 16
  1668. 16
  1669. 16
  1670. 16
  1671. 16
  1672. 16
  1673. 16
  1674. 16
  1675. 16
  1676. 16
  1677. 16
  1678. 16
  1679. 16
  1680. 16
  1681. 16
  1682. A statement from the Hong Kong spokesperson stated: First, the core essence of the Sino-British Joint Declaration is that China will resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong and does not give the UK the right to interfere in Hong Kong affairs after its return. The British side has no sovereignty, governance or supervision over Hong Kong after its return, and is not qualified to make irresponsible remarks on Hong Kong affairs. Second, the National Security Regulations for Hong Kong will not affect Hong Kong’s continued enjoyment of a high degree of autonomy in accordance with the Basic Law, nor will it detract from the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents. The crime is clearly defined and targets only a very small number of people who endanger national security. Law-abiding people do not have to worry about accidentally falling into the law. The normal activities of foreign institutions and personnel in Hong Kong are fully protected by law. Third, the Hong Kong National Security Regulations are a law to ensure security and development. It fully considers the need for Hong Kong to operate as an international financial, shipping and trade center and expand smooth and convenient international connections. It will not affect the normal development of business consultation, market research and other activities and the free flow of information. Instead, it will create a more stable and more stable environment for Hong Kong. A predictable business and development environment.
    16
  1683. 16
  1684. 16
  1685. 16
  1686. 16
  1687. 16
  1688. 16
  1689. 16
  1690. 16
  1691. 16
  1692. 16
  1693. 16
  1694. 16
  1695. 16
  1696. 16
  1697. 16
  1698. 16
  1699. 16
  1700. 16
  1701. 16
  1702. 16
  1703. 16
  1704. 16
  1705. 16
  1706. 16
  1707. 16
  1708. 16
  1709. 16
  1710. 16
  1711. 16
  1712. 16
  1713. 16
  1714. 16
  1715. 16
  1716. 16
  1717. 16
  1718. 16
  1719. 16
  1720. 16
  1721. 16
  1722. 16
  1723. 16
  1724. 16
  1725. 16
  1726. 16
  1727. 16
  1728. 16
  1729. 16
  1730. 16
  1731. 16
  1732. 16
  1733. 16
  1734. 16
  1735. 16
  1736. 16
  1737. 16
  1738. 16
  1739. 16
  1740. 16
  1741. 16
  1742. 16
  1743. 16
  1744. 16
  1745. 16
  1746. 16
  1747. 16
  1748. 16
  1749. 16
  1750. 16
  1751. 16
  1752. 16
  1753. 16
  1754. 16
  1755. 16
  1756. 16
  1757. 16
  1758. 16
  1759. 16
  1760. 16
  1761. 16
  1762. 16
  1763. 16
  1764. 16
  1765. 16
  1766. 16
  1767. 16
  1768. 16
  1769. 16
  1770. 16
  1771. 16
  1772. 16
  1773. 16
  1774. 16
  1775. 16
  1776. 16
  1777. 16
  1778. 16
  1779. 16
  1780. 16
  1781. 16
  1782. 16
  1783. 16
  1784. 16
  1785. 16
  1786. 16
  1787. 16
  1788. 15
  1789. 15
  1790. 15
  1791. 15
  1792. 15
  1793. 15
  1794. 15
  1795. 15
  1796. 15
  1797. 15
  1798. 15
  1799. 15
  1800. 15
  1801. 15
  1802. 15
  1803. 15
  1804. 15
  1805. 15
  1806. 15
  1807. 15
  1808. 15
  1809. 15
  1810. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    15
  1811. 15
  1812. 15
  1813. 15
  1814. 15
  1815. 15
  1816. 15
  1817. 15
  1818. 15
  1819. 15
  1820. 15
  1821. 15
  1822. 15
  1823. 15
  1824. 15
  1825. 15
  1826. 15
  1827. 15
  1828. 15
  1829. 15
  1830. 15
  1831. 15
  1832. 15
  1833. 15
  1834. 15
  1835. 15
  1836. 15
  1837. 15
  1838. 15
  1839. 15
  1840. 15
  1841. 15
  1842. 15
  1843. 15
  1844. 15
  1845. 15
  1846. 15
  1847. 15
  1848. 15
  1849. 15
  1850. 15
  1851. 15
  1852. 15
  1853. 15
  1854. 15
  1855. 15
  1856. 15
  1857. 15
  1858. 15
  1859. 15
  1860. 15
  1861. 15
  1862. 15
  1863. 15
  1864. 15
  1865. 15
  1866. 15
  1867. 15
  1868. 15
  1869. 15
  1870. 15
  1871. 15
  1872. 15
  1873. 15
  1874. 15
  1875. 15
  1876. 15
  1877. 15
  1878. 15
  1879. 15
  1880. 15
  1881. 15
  1882. 15
  1883. 15
  1884. 15
  1885. 15
  1886. 15
  1887. 15
  1888. 15
  1889. 15
  1890. 15
  1891. 15
  1892. 15
  1893. 15
  1894. 15
  1895. 15
  1896. 15
  1897. 15
  1898. 15
  1899. 15
  1900. 15
  1901. 15
  1902. 15
  1903. 15
  1904. 15
  1905. 15
  1906. 15
  1907. Thousands people joined a demonstration in Okinawa's prefectural capital on Feb. 26 to protest the Japanese government's plans to build up its defense capabilities on a group of islands in the country's south for a possible contingency in Taiwan. The national government is moving forward with plans to bolster the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) and deploy missiles on the Nansei Islands including Okinawa amid concerns of contingencies. Participants in the demonstration in Naha voiced opposition, with one saying, "I want the government to hold thorough dialogue to ease tensions with the neighboring country." The group's 69-year-old executive committee chairperson Takamatsu Gushiken, who has worked for many years to recover the remains of those who perished in the Battle of Okinawa toward the end of the Pacific War, told the rally, "Militarization is being pushed forward at such a speed that it does not leave leeway for the people of Okinawa to think. We must not resort to shelters or evacuation, but choose to stop Okinawa from becoming a battlefield." Hiromori Shimoji, cohead of a resident group opposing the deployment of missiles on Miyako Island, which hosts a missile unit, commented, "The GSDF camp is in an area close to residential homes, and the ammunition depot is also near the community. If something happens, residents would not be able to survive it." After the gathering, participants marched through the streets of Naha while holding signs reading, "Don't make the islands into battlefields!" and "No more military bases."
    15
  1908. 15
  1909. 15
  1910. 15
  1911. 15
  1912. 15
  1913. 15
  1914. 15
  1915. 15
  1916. 15
  1917. 15
  1918. 15
  1919. 15
  1920. 14
  1921. 14
  1922. 14
  1923. 14
  1924. 14
  1925. 14
  1926. 14
  1927. 14
  1928. 14
  1929. 14
  1930. 14
  1931. 14
  1932. 14
  1933. 14
  1934. 14
  1935. 14
  1936. 14
  1937. 14
  1938. 14
  1939. 14
  1940. 14
  1941. 14
  1942. 14
  1943. 14
  1944. 14
  1945. 14
  1946. 14
  1947. 14
  1948. 14
  1949. 14
  1950. 14
  1951. 14
  1952. 14
  1953. 14
  1954. 14
  1955. 14
  1956. 14
  1957. 14
  1958. 14
  1959. 14
  1960. 14
  1961. 14
  1962. 14
  1963. 14
  1964. 14
  1965. 14
  1966. 14
  1967. 14
  1968. 14
  1969. 14
  1970. 14
  1971. 14
  1972. 14
  1973. 14
  1974. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    14
  1975. 14
  1976. 14
  1977. 14
  1978. 14
  1979. 14
  1980. 14
  1981. 14
  1982. 14
  1983. 14
  1984. 14
  1985. 14
  1986. 14
  1987. 14
  1988. 14
  1989. 14
  1990. 14
  1991. 14
  1992. 14
  1993. 14
  1994. 14
  1995. 14
  1996. 14
  1997. 14
  1998. 14
  1999. 14
  2000. 14
  2001. 14
  2002. 14
  2003. 14
  2004. 14
  2005. 14
  2006. 14
  2007. 14
  2008. 14
  2009. 14
  2010. 14
  2011. 14
  2012. 14
  2013. 14
  2014. 14
  2015. 14
  2016. 14
  2017. 14
  2018. 14
  2019. 14
  2020. 14
  2021. 14
  2022. 14
  2023. 14
  2024. 14
  2025. 14
  2026. 14
  2027. 14
  2028. 14
  2029. 14
  2030. 14
  2031. 14
  2032. 14
  2033. 14
  2034. 14
  2035. 14
  2036. 14
  2037. 14
  2038. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    14
  2039. 14
  2040. 14
  2041. 14
  2042. 14
  2043. 14
  2044. 14
  2045. 14
  2046. 14
  2047. 14
  2048. 14
  2049. 14
  2050. 14
  2051. 14
  2052. 14
  2053. 14
  2054. 14
  2055. 14
  2056. 14
  2057. 14
  2058. 14
  2059. 14
  2060. 14
  2061. 14
  2062. 14
  2063. 14
  2064. 14
  2065. 14
  2066. 14
  2067. 14
  2068. 14
  2069. 14
  2070. 14
  2071. 14
  2072. 14
  2073. 14
  2074. 13
  2075. 13
  2076. 13
  2077. 13
  2078. 13
  2079. 13
  2080. 13
  2081. 13
  2082. 13
  2083. 13
  2084. 13
  2085. 13
  2086. 13
  2087. 13
  2088. 13
  2089. 13
  2090. 13
  2091. 13
  2092. 13
  2093. 13
  2094. 13
  2095. 13
  2096. 13
  2097. 13
  2098. 13
  2099. 13
  2100. 13
  2101. 13
  2102. 13
  2103. 13
  2104. 13
  2105. 13
  2106. 13
  2107. 13
  2108. 13
  2109. 13
  2110. 13
  2111. 13
  2112. 13
  2113. 13
  2114. 13
  2115. 13
  2116. 13
  2117. 13
  2118. 13
  2119. 13
  2120. 13
  2121. 13
  2122. 13
  2123. 13
  2124. 13
  2125. 13
  2126. 13
  2127. 13
  2128. 13
  2129. 13
  2130. 13
  2131. 13
  2132. 13
  2133. 13
  2134. 13
  2135. 13
  2136. 13
  2137. 13
  2138. 13
  2139. 13
  2140. 13
  2141. 13
  2142. 13
  2143. 13
  2144. 13
  2145. 13
  2146. 13
  2147. 13
  2148. 13
  2149. 13
  2150. 13
  2151. 13
  2152. 13
  2153. 13
  2154. 13
  2155. 13
  2156. 13
  2157. 13
  2158. 13
  2159. 13
  2160. 13
  2161. 13
  2162. 13
  2163. 13
  2164. 13
  2165. 13
  2166. 13
  2167. 13
  2168. 13
  2169. 13
  2170. 13
  2171. 13
  2172. 13
  2173. 13
  2174. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    13
  2175. 13
  2176. 13
  2177. 13
  2178. 13
  2179. 13
  2180. 13
  2181. 13
  2182. 13
  2183. 13
  2184. 13
  2185. 13
  2186. 13
  2187. 13
  2188. 13
  2189. 13
  2190. 13
  2191. 13
  2192. 13
  2193. 13
  2194. 13
  2195. 13
  2196. 13
  2197. 13
  2198. 13
  2199. 13
  2200. 13
  2201. 13
  2202. 13
  2203. 13
  2204. 13
  2205. 13
  2206. 13
  2207. 13
  2208. 13
  2209. 13
  2210. 13
  2211. 13
  2212. 13
  2213. 13
  2214. 13
  2215. 13
  2216. 13
  2217. 13
  2218. 13
  2219. 13
  2220. 13
  2221. 13
  2222. 13
  2223. 13
  2224. 13
  2225. 13
  2226. 13
  2227. 13
  2228. 13
  2229. 13
  2230. 13
  2231. 13
  2232. 13
  2233. 13
  2234. 13
  2235. 13
  2236. 13
  2237. 13
  2238. 13
  2239. 13
  2240. 13
  2241. 13
  2242. 13
  2243. 13
  2244. 13
  2245. 13
  2246. 13
  2247. 13
  2248. 13
  2249. 13
  2250. 13
  2251. 13
  2252. 13
  2253. 13
  2254. 13
  2255. 13
  2256. 13
  2257. 13
  2258. 13
  2259. 13
  2260. 13
  2261. 13
  2262. 13
  2263. 13
  2264. 13
  2265. 13
  2266. 13
  2267. 13
  2268. 13
  2269. 13
  2270. 13
  2271. 13
  2272. 13
  2273. 13
  2274. 13
  2275. 13
  2276. 13
  2277. 12
  2278. 12
  2279. 12
  2280. 12
  2281. 12
  2282. 12
  2283. 12
  2284. 12
  2285. 12
  2286. 12
  2287. 12
  2288. 12
  2289. 12
  2290. 12
  2291. 12
  2292. 12
  2293. 12
  2294. 12
  2295. 12
  2296. 12
  2297. 12
  2298. 12
  2299. 12
  2300. 12
  2301. 12
  2302. 12
  2303. 12
  2304. 12
  2305. 12
  2306. 12
  2307. 12
  2308. 12
  2309. 12
  2310. 12
  2311. 12
  2312. 12
  2313. 12
  2314. 12
  2315. 12
  2316. 12
  2317. 12
  2318. 12
  2319. 12
  2320. 12
  2321. 12
  2322. 12
  2323. 12
  2324. 12
  2325. 12
  2326. 12
  2327. 12
  2328. 12
  2329. 12
  2330. 12
  2331. 12
  2332. 12
  2333. 12
  2334. 12
  2335. 12
  2336. 12
  2337. 12
  2338. 12
  2339. 12
  2340. 12
  2341. 12
  2342. 12
  2343. 12
  2344. 12
  2345. 12
  2346. 12
  2347. 12
  2348. 12
  2349. 12
  2350. 12
  2351. 12
  2352. 12
  2353. 12
  2354. 12
  2355. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    12
  2356. 12
  2357. 12
  2358. 12
  2359. 12
  2360. 12
  2361. 12
  2362. 12
  2363. 12
  2364. 12
  2365. 12
  2366. 12
  2367. 12
  2368. 12
  2369. 12
  2370. 12
  2371. 12
  2372. 12
  2373. 12
  2374. 12
  2375. 12
  2376. 12
  2377. 12
  2378. 12
  2379. 12
  2380. 12
  2381. 12
  2382. 12
  2383. 12
  2384. 12
  2385. 12
  2386. 12
  2387. 12
  2388. 12
  2389. 12
  2390. 12
  2391. 12
  2392. 12
  2393. 12
  2394. 12
  2395. 12
  2396. 12
  2397. 12
  2398. 12
  2399. 12
  2400. 12
  2401. 12
  2402. 12
  2403. 12
  2404. 12
  2405. 12
  2406. 12
  2407. 12
  2408. 12
  2409. 12
  2410. 12
  2411. 12
  2412. 12
  2413. 12
  2414. 12
  2415. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    12
  2416. 12
  2417. 12
  2418. 12
  2419. 12
  2420. 12
  2421. 12
  2422. 12
  2423. 12
  2424. 12
  2425. 12
  2426. 12
  2427. 12
  2428. 12
  2429. 12
  2430. 12
  2431. 12
  2432. 12
  2433. 12
  2434. 12
  2435. 12
  2436. 12
  2437. 12
  2438. 12
  2439. 12
  2440. 12
  2441. 12
  2442. 12
  2443. 12
  2444. 12
  2445. 12
  2446. 12
  2447. 12
  2448. 12
  2449. 12
  2450. 12
  2451. 12
  2452. 12
  2453. 12
  2454. 12
  2455. 12
  2456. 12
  2457. 12
  2458. 12
  2459. 12
  2460. 12
  2461. 12
  2462. 12
  2463. 12
  2464. 12
  2465. 12
  2466. 12
  2467. 12
  2468. 12
  2469. 12
  2470. 12
  2471. 12
  2472. 12
  2473. 12
  2474. 12
  2475. 12
  2476. 12
  2477. 12
  2478. 12
  2479. 12
  2480. 12
  2481. 12
  2482. 12
  2483. 12
  2484. 12
  2485. 12
  2486. 12
  2487. 12
  2488. 12
  2489. 12
  2490. 12
  2491. 12
  2492. 11
  2493. 11
  2494. 11
  2495. 11
  2496. 11
  2497. 11
  2498. 11
  2499. 11
  2500. 11
  2501. 11
  2502. 11
  2503. 11
  2504. 11
  2505. 11
  2506. 11
  2507. 11
  2508. 11
  2509. 11
  2510. 11
  2511. 11
  2512. 11
  2513. 11
  2514. 11
  2515. 11
  2516. 11
  2517. 11
  2518. 11
  2519. 11
  2520. 11
  2521. 11
  2522. 11
  2523. 11
  2524. 11
  2525. 11
  2526. 11
  2527. 11
  2528. 11
  2529. 11
  2530. 11
  2531. 11
  2532. 11
  2533. 11
  2534. 11
  2535. 11
  2536. 11
  2537. 11
  2538. 11
  2539. 11
  2540. 11
  2541. 11
  2542. 11
  2543. 11
  2544. 11
  2545. 11
  2546. 11
  2547. 11
  2548. 11
  2549. 11
  2550. 11
  2551. 11
  2552. 11
  2553. 11
  2554. 11
  2555. 11
  2556. 11
  2557. 11
  2558. 11
  2559. 11
  2560. 11
  2561. 11
  2562. 11
  2563. 11
  2564. 11
  2565. 11
  2566. 11
  2567. 11
  2568. 11
  2569. 11
  2570. 11
  2571. 11
  2572. 11
  2573. 11
  2574. 11
  2575. 11
  2576. 11
  2577. 11
  2578. 11
  2579. 11
  2580. 11
  2581. 11
  2582. 11
  2583. 11
  2584. 11
  2585. 11
  2586. 11
  2587. 11
  2588. 11
  2589. 11
  2590. 11
  2591. 11
  2592. 11
  2593. 11
  2594. 11
  2595. 11
  2596. 11
  2597. 11
  2598. 11
  2599. 11
  2600. 11
  2601. 11
  2602. 11
  2603. 11
  2604. 11
  2605. 11
  2606. 11
  2607. 11
  2608. 11
  2609. 11
  2610. 11
  2611. 11
  2612. 11
  2613. 11
  2614. 11
  2615. 11
  2616. 11
  2617. 11
  2618. 11
  2619. 11
  2620. 11
  2621. 11
  2622. 11
  2623. 11
  2624. 11
  2625. 11
  2626. 11
  2627. 11
  2628. 11
  2629. 11
  2630. 11
  2631. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    11
  2632. 11
  2633. 11
  2634. 11
  2635. 11
  2636. 11
  2637. 11
  2638. 11
  2639. 11
  2640. 11
  2641. 11
  2642. 11
  2643. 11
  2644. 11
  2645. 11
  2646. 11
  2647. 11
  2648. 11
  2649. 11
  2650. 11
  2651. 11
  2652. 11
  2653. 11
  2654. 11
  2655. 11
  2656. 11
  2657. 11
  2658. 11
  2659. 11
  2660. 11
  2661. 11
  2662. 11
  2663. 11
  2664. 11
  2665. 11
  2666. 11
  2667. 11
  2668. 11
  2669. 11
  2670. 11
  2671. 11
  2672. 11
  2673. 11
  2674. 11
  2675. 11
  2676. 11
  2677. 11
  2678. 11
  2679. 11
  2680. 11
  2681. 11
  2682. 11
  2683. 11
  2684. 11
  2685. 11
  2686. 11
  2687. 11
  2688. 11
  2689. 11
  2690. 11
  2691. 11
  2692. 11
  2693. 11
  2694. 11
  2695. 11
  2696. 11
  2697. 11
  2698. 11
  2699. 11
  2700. 11
  2701. 11
  2702. 11
  2703. 11
  2704. 11
  2705. 11
  2706. 11
  2707. 11
  2708. 11
  2709. 11
  2710. 11
  2711. 11
  2712. 11
  2713. 11
  2714. 11
  2715. 11
  2716. 11
  2717. 11
  2718. 11
  2719. 11
  2720. 11
  2721. 11
  2722. 11
  2723. 11
  2724. 11
  2725. 11
  2726. 11
  2727. 11
  2728. 11
  2729. 11
  2730. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    11
  2731. 11
  2732. 11
  2733. 11
  2734. 11
  2735. 11
  2736. 11
  2737. 11
  2738. 11
  2739. 11
  2740. 11
  2741. 11
  2742. 11
  2743. 11
  2744. 11
  2745. 11
  2746. 11
  2747. 11
  2748. 11
  2749. 11
  2750. 11
  2751. 11
  2752. 11
  2753. 11
  2754. 11
  2755. 11
  2756. 11
  2757. 11
  2758. 11
  2759. 11
  2760. 11
  2761. 11
  2762. 11
  2763. 11
  2764. 11
  2765. 11
  2766. 11
  2767. 11
  2768. 11
  2769. 11
  2770. 11
  2771. 11
  2772. 11
  2773. 11
  2774. 10
  2775. 10
  2776. 10
  2777. 10
  2778. 10
  2779. 10
  2780. 10
  2781. 10
  2782. 10
  2783. 10
  2784. 10
  2785. 10
  2786. 10
  2787. 10
  2788. 10
  2789. 10
  2790. 10
  2791. 10
  2792. 10
  2793. 10
  2794. 10
  2795. 10
  2796. 10
  2797. 10
  2798. 10
  2799. 10
  2800. 10
  2801. 10
  2802. 10
  2803. 10
  2804. 10
  2805. 10
  2806. 10
  2807. 10
  2808. 10
  2809. 10
  2810. 10
  2811. 10
  2812. 10
  2813. 10
  2814. 10
  2815. 10
  2816. 10
  2817. 10
  2818. 10
  2819. 10
  2820. 10
  2821. 10
  2822. 10
  2823. 10
  2824. 10
  2825. 10
  2826. 10
  2827. 10
  2828. 10
  2829. 10
  2830. 10
  2831. 10
  2832. 10
  2833. 10
  2834. 10
  2835. 10
  2836. 10
  2837. 10
  2838. 10
  2839. 10
  2840. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    10
  2841. 10
  2842. 10
  2843. 10
  2844. 10
  2845. 10
  2846. 10
  2847. 10
  2848. 10
  2849. 10
  2850. 10
  2851. 10
  2852. 10
  2853. 10
  2854. 10
  2855. 10
  2856. 10
  2857. 10
  2858. 10
  2859. 10
  2860. 10
  2861. 10
  2862. 10
  2863. 10
  2864. 10
  2865. 10
  2866. 10
  2867. 10
  2868. 10
  2869. 10
  2870. 10
  2871. 10
  2872. 10
  2873. 10
  2874. 10
  2875. 10
  2876. 10
  2877. 10
  2878. 10
  2879. 10
  2880. 10
  2881. 10
  2882. 10
  2883. 10
  2884. 10
  2885. 10
  2886. 10
  2887. 10
  2888. 10
  2889. 10
  2890. 10
  2891. 10
  2892. 10
  2893. 10
  2894. 10
  2895. 10
  2896. 10
  2897. 10
  2898. 10
  2899. 10
  2900. 10
  2901. 10
  2902. 10
  2903. 10
  2904. 10
  2905. 10
  2906. 10
  2907. 10
  2908. 10
  2909. 10
  2910. 10
  2911. 10
  2912. 10
  2913. 10
  2914. 10
  2915. 10
  2916. 10
  2917. 10
  2918. 10
  2919. 10
  2920. 10
  2921. 10
  2922. 10
  2923. 10
  2924. 10
  2925. 10
  2926. 10
  2927. 10
  2928. 10
  2929. 10
  2930. 10
  2931. 10
  2932. 10
  2933. 10
  2934. 10
  2935. 10
  2936. 10
  2937. 10
  2938. 10
  2939. 10
  2940. 10
  2941. 10
  2942. 10
  2943. 10
  2944. 10
  2945. 10
  2946. 10
  2947. 10
  2948. 10
  2949. 10
  2950. 10
  2951. 10
  2952. 10
  2953. 10
  2954. 10
  2955. 10
  2956. 10
  2957. 10
  2958. 10
  2959. 10
  2960. 10
  2961. 10
  2962. 10
  2963. 10
  2964. 10
  2965. 10
  2966. 10
  2967. 10
  2968. 10
  2969. 10
  2970. 10
  2971. 10
  2972. 10
  2973. 10
  2974. 10
  2975. 10
  2976. 10
  2977. 10
  2978. 10
  2979. 10
  2980. 10
  2981. 10
  2982. 10
  2983. 10
  2984. 10
  2985. 10
  2986. 10
  2987. 10
  2988. 10
  2989. 10
  2990. 10
  2991. 10
  2992. 10
  2993. 10
  2994. 10
  2995. 10
  2996. 10
  2997. 10
  2998. 10
  2999. 10
  3000. 10
  3001. 10
  3002. 10
  3003. 10
  3004. 10
  3005. 10
  3006. 10
  3007. 10
  3008. 10
  3009. 10
  3010. 10
  3011. 10
  3012. 10
  3013. 10
  3014. 10
  3015. 10
  3016. 10
  3017. 10
  3018. 10
  3019. 10
  3020. 10
  3021. 10
  3022. 10
  3023. 10
  3024. 10
  3025. 10
  3026. 10
  3027. 10
  3028. 10
  3029. 10
  3030. 10
  3031. 10
  3032. 10
  3033. 10
  3034. 10
  3035. 10
  3036. 10
  3037. 10
  3038. 10
  3039. 10
  3040. 10
  3041. 10
  3042. 10
  3043. 10
  3044. 10
  3045. 10
  3046. 10
  3047. 10
  3048. 10
  3049. 10
  3050. 10
  3051. 10
  3052. 10
  3053. 10
  3054. 10
  3055. 10
  3056. 10
  3057. 10
  3058. 10
  3059. 10
  3060. 10
  3061. 10
  3062. 10
  3063. 10
  3064. 10
  3065. 10
  3066. 10
  3067. 10
  3068. 10
  3069. 10
  3070. 10
  3071. 10
  3072. 10
  3073. 10
  3074. 10
  3075. 10
  3076. 10
  3077. 10
  3078. 10
  3079. 10
  3080. 10
  3081. 10
  3082. 10
  3083. 10
  3084. 10
  3085. 10
  3086. 10
  3087. 10
  3088. 10
  3089. 10
  3090. 10
  3091. 10
  3092. 10
  3093. 10
  3094. 10
  3095. 10
  3096. 10
  3097. 10
  3098. 10
  3099. 10
  3100. 10
  3101. 10
  3102. 10
  3103. 10
  3104. 10
  3105. 10
  3106. 10
  3107. 9
  3108. 9
  3109. 9
  3110. 9
  3111. 9
  3112. 9
  3113. 9
  3114. 9
  3115. 9
  3116. 9
  3117. 9
  3118. 9
  3119. 9
  3120. 9
  3121. 9
  3122. 9
  3123. 9
  3124. 9
  3125. 9
  3126. 9
  3127. 9
  3128. 9
  3129. 9
  3130. 9
  3131. 9
  3132. 9
  3133. 9
  3134. 9
  3135. 9
  3136. 9
  3137. 9
  3138. 9
  3139. 9
  3140. 9
  3141. 9
  3142. 9
  3143. 9
  3144. 9
  3145. 9
  3146. 9
  3147. 9
  3148. 9
  3149. 9
  3150. 9
  3151. 9
  3152. 9
  3153. 9
  3154. 9
  3155. 9
  3156. 9
  3157. 9
  3158. 9
  3159. 9
  3160. 9
  3161. 9
  3162. 9
  3163. 9
  3164. 9
  3165. 9
  3166. 9
  3167. 9
  3168. 9
  3169. 9
  3170. 9
  3171. 9
  3172. 9
  3173. 9
  3174. 9
  3175. 9
  3176. 9
  3177. 9
  3178. 9
  3179. 9
  3180. 9
  3181. 9
  3182. 9
  3183. 9
  3184. 9
  3185. 9
  3186. 9
  3187. 9
  3188. 9
  3189. 9
  3190. 9
  3191. 9
  3192. 9
  3193. 9
  3194. 9
  3195. 9
  3196. 9
  3197. 9
  3198. 9
  3199. 9
  3200. 9
  3201. 9
  3202. 9
  3203. 9
  3204. 9
  3205. 9
  3206. 9
  3207. 9
  3208. 9
  3209. 9
  3210. 9
  3211. 9
  3212. 9
  3213. 9
  3214. 9
  3215. 9
  3216. 9
  3217. 9
  3218. 9
  3219. 9
  3220. 9
  3221. 9
  3222. 9
  3223. 9
  3224. 9
  3225. 9
  3226. 9
  3227. 9
  3228. 9
  3229. 9
  3230. 9
  3231. 9
  3232. 9
  3233. 9
  3234. 9
  3235. 9
  3236. 9
  3237. 9
  3238. 9
  3239. 9
  3240. 9
  3241. 9
  3242. 9
  3243. 9
  3244. 9
  3245. 9
  3246. 9
  3247. 9
  3248. 9
  3249. 9
  3250. 9
  3251. 9
  3252. 9
  3253. 9
  3254. 9
  3255. 9
  3256. 9
  3257. 9
  3258. 9
  3259. 9
  3260. 9
  3261. 9
  3262. 9
  3263. 9
  3264. 9
  3265. 9
  3266. 9
  3267. 9
  3268. 9
  3269. 9
  3270. 9
  3271. 9
  3272. 9
  3273. 9
  3274. 9
  3275. 9
  3276. 9
  3277. 9
  3278. 9
  3279. 9
  3280. 9
  3281. 9
  3282. 9
  3283. 9
  3284. 9
  3285. 9
  3286. 9
  3287. 9
  3288. 9
  3289. 9
  3290. 9
  3291. 9
  3292. 9
  3293. 9
  3294. 9
  3295. 9
  3296. 9
  3297. 9
  3298. 9
  3299. 9
  3300. 9
  3301. 9
  3302. 9
  3303. 9
  3304. 9
  3305. 9
  3306. 9
  3307. 9
  3308. 9
  3309. 9
  3310. 9
  3311. 9
  3312. 9
  3313. 9
  3314. 9
  3315. 9
  3316. 9
  3317. 9
  3318. 9
  3319. 9
  3320. 9
  3321. 9
  3322. 9
  3323. 9
  3324. 9
  3325. 9
  3326. 9
  3327. 9
  3328. 9
  3329. 9
  3330. 9
  3331. 9
  3332. 9
  3333. 9
  3334. 9
  3335. 9
  3336. 9
  3337. 9
  3338. 9
  3339. 9
  3340. 9
  3341. 9
  3342. 9
  3343. 9
  3344. 9
  3345. 9
  3346. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    9
  3347. 9
  3348. 9
  3349. 9
  3350. 9
  3351. 9
  3352. 9
  3353. 9
  3354. 9
  3355. 9
  3356. 9
  3357. 9
  3358. 9
  3359. 9
  3360. 9
  3361. 9
  3362. 9
  3363. 9
  3364. 9
  3365. 9
  3366. 9
  3367. 9
  3368. 9
  3369. 9
  3370. 9
  3371. 9
  3372. 9
  3373. 9
  3374. 9
  3375. 9
  3376. 9
  3377. 9
  3378. 9
  3379. 9
  3380. 9
  3381. 9
  3382. 9
  3383. 9
  3384. 9
  3385. 9
  3386. 9
  3387. 9
  3388. 9
  3389. 9
  3390. 9
  3391. 9
  3392. 9
  3393. 9
  3394. 9
  3395. 9
  3396. 9
  3397. 9
  3398. 9
  3399. 9
  3400. 9
  3401. 9
  3402. 9
  3403. 9
  3404. 9
  3405. 9
  3406. 9
  3407. 9
  3408. 9
  3409. 9
  3410. 9
  3411. 9
  3412. 9
  3413. 9
  3414. 9
  3415. 9
  3416. 9
  3417. 9
  3418. 9
  3419. 9
  3420. 9
  3421. 9
  3422. 9
  3423. 9
  3424. 9
  3425. 9
  3426. 9
  3427. 9
  3428. 9
  3429. 9
  3430. 9
  3431. 9
  3432. 9
  3433. 9
  3434. 9
  3435. 9
  3436. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    9
  3437. 9
  3438. 9
  3439. 9
  3440. 9
  3441. 9
  3442. 9
  3443. 9
  3444. 9
  3445. 9
  3446. 9
  3447. 9
  3448. 9
  3449. 9
  3450. 9
  3451. 9
  3452. 9
  3453. 9
  3454. 9
  3455. 9
  3456. 9
  3457. 9
  3458. 9
  3459. 9
  3460. 9
  3461. 9
  3462. 9
  3463. 9
  3464. 9
  3465. 9
  3466. 9
  3467. 9
  3468. 9
  3469. 9
  3470. 9
  3471. 9
  3472. 9
  3473. 9
  3474. 9
  3475. 9
  3476. 9
  3477. 9
  3478. 9
  3479. 9
  3480. 9
  3481. 9
  3482. 9
  3483. 9
  3484. 9
  3485. 9
  3486. 9
  3487. 9
  3488. 9
  3489. 9
  3490. 9
  3491. 9
  3492. 9
  3493. 9
  3494. 9
  3495. 9
  3496. 9
  3497. 9
  3498. 9
  3499. 9
  3500. 9
  3501. 9
  3502. 9
  3503. 9
  3504. 9
  3505. 9
  3506. 9
  3507. 9
  3508. 9
  3509. 9
  3510. 9
  3511. 9
  3512. 9
  3513. 9
  3514. 9
  3515. 9
  3516. 9
  3517. 9
  3518. 9
  3519. 9
  3520. 9
  3521. 9
  3522. 9
  3523. 9
  3524. 9
  3525. 9
  3526. 9
  3527. 9
  3528. 9
  3529. 9
  3530. 9
  3531. 9
  3532. 9
  3533. 9
  3534. 9
  3535. 9
  3536. 9
  3537. 9
  3538. 9
  3539. 9
  3540. 9
  3541. 9
  3542. 9
  3543. 9
  3544. 9
  3545. 9
  3546. 9
  3547. 9
  3548. 9
  3549. 9
  3550. 9
  3551. 9
  3552. 9
  3553. 9
  3554. 9
  3555. 9
  3556. 9
  3557. 9
  3558. 9
  3559. 9
  3560. 9
  3561. 9
  3562. 9
  3563. 9
  3564. 9
  3565. 9
  3566. 9
  3567. DW need a better report than below: 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    9
  3568. 9
  3569. 9
  3570. 9
  3571. 9
  3572. 9
  3573. 9
  3574. 9
  3575. 9
  3576. 9
  3577. 9
  3578. 9
  3579. 9
  3580. 9
  3581. 9
  3582. 9
  3583. 9
  3584. 9
  3585. 9
  3586. 9
  3587. 8
  3588. 8
  3589. 8
  3590. 8
  3591. 8
  3592. 8
  3593. 8
  3594. 8
  3595. 8
  3596. 8
  3597. 8
  3598. 8
  3599. 8
  3600. 8
  3601. 8
  3602. 8
  3603. 8
  3604. 8
  3605. 8
  3606. 8
  3607. 8
  3608. 8
  3609. 8
  3610. 8
  3611. 8
  3612. 8
  3613. 8
  3614. 8
  3615. 8
  3616. 8
  3617. 8
  3618. 8
  3619. 8
  3620. 8
  3621. 8
  3622. 8
  3623. 8
  3624. 8
  3625. 8
  3626. 8
  3627. 8
  3628. 8
  3629. 8
  3630. During Tuesday's late parliamentary defense committee meeting, military officers related to the martial law declaration testified with some shocking details revealed. Commanders and military leaders have begun to testify during investigations into President Yoon's botched martial law order. Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the suspended chief of the Army Special Warfare Command said he was instructed to drag lawmakers out of the National Assembly while the order was in place. The comments were made during a parliamentary defense committee meeting that was held until late Tuesday night. "The president called me directly on a secure phone. He told me "The quorum doesn't appear to have been met yet. Break down the doors fast, go in, and drag out people inside." Though he received the order from Yoon, commanders on the ground resisted, and Kwak also figured their resistance was the correct action. He also believed it was not right for troops to go in, because of the chance of future criminal action and due to concerns of injuries if they forced their way in. Kwak said he ordered troops not to go any further before informing the ex-defense minister Kim Yong-hyun of his decision. Kwak also revealed, that he had knowledge of some details of the martial law plan two days ahead of Yoon's declaration on December 3rd. He said he received orders from then-Defense Minister Kim over a secure landline, to secure six locations. "I was given the mission to secure six locations, the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, the Democratic Party headquarters, and Flower Research, an opinion polling company, on around December 1st." After the order, Kwak says he only thought about what he would do if something actually happened, and did not tell the subordinate brigade commanders, as they could get into trouble. He only told them on the day they were actually being deployed. Meanwhile, there was also testimony from inside the Defense Counterintelligence Command. Brigade General Kim Dae-woo, chief of the Defense Counterintelligence Command’s investigation unit, said Commander Yeo In-hyung ordered him to check if a key military bunker had space to detain people inside. The B1 bunker, which is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Capital Defense Command, serves as the de facto wartime command center for Korea's military.
    8
  3631. 8
  3632. 8
  3633. 8
  3634. 8
  3635. 8
  3636. 8
  3637. 8
  3638. 8
  3639. 8
  3640. 8
  3641. 8
  3642. 8
  3643. 8
  3644. 8
  3645. 8
  3646. 8
  3647. 8
  3648. 8
  3649. 8
  3650. 8
  3651. 8
  3652. 8
  3653. 8
  3654. 8
  3655. 8
  3656. 8
  3657. 8
  3658. 8
  3659. 8
  3660. 8
  3661. 8
  3662. 8
  3663. 8
  3664. 8
  3665. 8
  3666. 8
  3667. 8
  3668. 8
  3669. 8
  3670. 8
  3671. 8
  3672. 8
  3673. 8
  3674. 8
  3675. 8
  3676. 8
  3677. 8
  3678. 8
  3679. 8
  3680. 8
  3681. 8
  3682. 8
  3683. 8
  3684. 8
  3685. 8
  3686. 8
  3687. 8
  3688. 8
  3689. 8
  3690. 8
  3691. 8
  3692. 8
  3693. 8
  3694. 8
  3695. 8
  3696. 8
  3697. 8
  3698. 8
  3699. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    8
  3700. 8
  3701. 8
  3702. 8
  3703. 8
  3704. 8
  3705. 8
  3706. 8
  3707. 8
  3708. 8
  3709. How all these started..... During Tuesday's late parliamentary defense committee meeting, military officers related to the martial law declaration testified with some shocking details revealed. Commanders and military leaders have begun to testify during investigations into President Yoon's botched martial law order. Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the suspended chief of the Army Special Warfare Command said he was instructed to drag lawmakers out of the National Assembly while the order was in place. The comments were made during a parliamentary defense committee meeting that was held until late Tuesday night. "The president called me directly on a secure phone. He told me "The quorum doesn't appear to have been met yet. Break down the doors fast, go in, and drag out people inside." Though he received the order from Yoon, commanders on the ground resisted, and Kwak also figured their resistance was the correct action. He also believed it was not right for troops to go in, because of the chance of future criminal action and due to concerns of injuries if they forced their way in. Kwak said he ordered troops not to go any further before informing the ex-defense minister Kim Yong-hyun of his decision. Kwak also revealed, that he had knowledge of some details of the martial law plan two days ahead of Yoon's declaration on December 3rd. He said he received orders from then-Defense Minister Kim over a secure landline, to secure six locations. "I was given the mission to secure six locations, the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, the Democratic Party headquarters, and Flower Research, an opinion polling company, on around December 1st." After the order, Kwak says he only thought about what he would do if something actually happened, and did not tell the subordinate brigade commanders, as they could get into trouble. He only told them on the day they were actually being deployed. Meanwhile, there was also testimony from inside the Defense Counterintelligence Command. Brigade General Kim Dae-woo, chief of the Defense Counterintelligence Command’s investigation unit, said Commander Yeo In-hyung ordered him to check if a key military bunker had space to detain people inside. The B1 bunker, which is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Capital Defense Command, serves as the de facto wartime command center for Korea's military.
    8
  3710. 8
  3711. 8
  3712. 8
  3713. 8
  3714. 8
  3715. 8
  3716. 8
  3717. 8
  3718. 8
  3719. 8
  3720. 8
  3721. 8
  3722. 8
  3723. 8
  3724. 8
  3725. 8
  3726. 8
  3727. 8
  3728. 8
  3729. 8
  3730. 8
  3731. 8
  3732. 8
  3733. 8
  3734. 8
  3735. 8
  3736. 8
  3737. 8
  3738. 8
  3739. 8
  3740. 8
  3741. 8
  3742. 8
  3743. 8
  3744. 8
  3745. 8
  3746. 8
  3747. 8
  3748. 8
  3749. 8
  3750. 8
  3751. 8
  3752. 8
  3753. 8
  3754. 8
  3755. 8
  3756. 8
  3757. 8
  3758. 8
  3759. 8
  3760. 8
  3761. 8
  3762. 8
  3763. 8
  3764. 8
  3765. 8
  3766. 8
  3767. 8
  3768. 8
  3769. 8
  3770. 8
  3771. 8
  3772. 8
  3773. 8
  3774. 8
  3775. 8
  3776. 8
  3777. 8
  3778. 8
  3779. 8
  3780. 8
  3781. 8
  3782. 8
  3783. 8
  3784. 8
  3785. 8
  3786. 8
  3787. 8
  3788. 8
  3789. 8
  3790. 8
  3791. 8
  3792. 8
  3793. 8
  3794. 8
  3795. 8
  3796. 8
  3797. 8
  3798. 8
  3799. 8
  3800. 8
  3801. 8
  3802. 8
  3803. 8
  3804. 8
  3805. 8
  3806. 8
  3807. 8
  3808. 8
  3809. 8
  3810. 8
  3811. 8
  3812. 8
  3813. 8
  3814. 8
  3815. 8
  3816. 8
  3817. 8
  3818. 8
  3819. 8
  3820. 8
  3821. 8
  3822. 8
  3823. 8
  3824. 8
  3825. 8
  3826. 8
  3827. 8
  3828. 8
  3829. 8
  3830. 8
  3831. 8
  3832. 8
  3833. 8
  3834. 8
  3835. 8
  3836. 8
  3837. 8
  3838. 8
  3839. 8
  3840. 8
  3841. 8
  3842. 8
  3843. 8
  3844. 8
  3845. 8
  3846. 8
  3847. 8
  3848. 8
  3849. 8
  3850. 8
  3851. 8
  3852. 8
  3853. 8
  3854. 8
  3855. 8
  3856. 8
  3857. 8
  3858. 8
  3859. 8
  3860. 8
  3861. 8
  3862. 8
  3863. 8
  3864. 8
  3865. 8
  3866. 8
  3867. 8
  3868. 8
  3869. 8
  3870. 8
  3871. 8
  3872. 8
  3873. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    8
  3874. 8
  3875. 8
  3876. 8
  3877. 8
  3878. 8
  3879. 8
  3880. 8
  3881. 8
  3882. 8
  3883. 8
  3884. 8
  3885. 8
  3886. 8
  3887. 8
  3888. 8
  3889. 8
  3890. 8
  3891. 8
  3892. 8
  3893. 8
  3894. 8
  3895. 8
  3896. 8
  3897. 8
  3898. 8
  3899. 8
  3900. 8
  3901. 8
  3902. 8
  3903. 8
  3904. 8
  3905. 8
  3906. 8
  3907. 8
  3908. 8
  3909. 8
  3910. 8
  3911. 8
  3912. 8
  3913. 8
  3914. 8
  3915. 8
  3916. 8
  3917. 8
  3918. 8
  3919. 8
  3920. 8
  3921. 8
  3922. 8
  3923. 8
  3924. 8
  3925. 8
  3926. 8
  3927. 8
  3928. 8
  3929. 8
  3930. 8
  3931. 8
  3932. 8
  3933. 8
  3934. 8
  3935. 8
  3936. 8
  3937. 8
  3938. 8
  3939. 8
  3940. 8
  3941. 8
  3942. 8
  3943. 8
  3944. 8
  3945. 8
  3946. 8
  3947. 8
  3948. 8
  3949. 8
  3950. 8
  3951. 8
  3952. 8
  3953. 8
  3954. 8
  3955. 8
  3956. 8
  3957. 8
  3958. 8
  3959. 8
  3960. 8
  3961. 8
  3962. 8
  3963. 8
  3964. 8
  3965. 8
  3966. 8
  3967. 8
  3968. 8
  3969. 8
  3970. 8
  3971. 8
  3972. 8
  3973. 8
  3974. 8
  3975. 8
  3976. 8
  3977. 8
  3978. 8
  3979. 8
  3980. 8
  3981. 8
  3982. 8
  3983. 8
  3984. 8
  3985. 8
  3986. 8
  3987. 8
  3988. 8
  3989. 8
  3990. 8
  3991. 8
  3992. 8
  3993. 8
  3994. 8
  3995. 8
  3996. 8
  3997. 8
  3998. 8
  3999. 8
  4000. 8
  4001. 8
  4002. 8
  4003. 8
  4004. 8
  4005. 8
  4006. 8
  4007. 8
  4008. 8
  4009. 8
  4010. 8
  4011. 8
  4012. 8
  4013. 8
  4014. 8
  4015. 8
  4016. 8
  4017. 8
  4018. 8
  4019. 8
  4020. 8
  4021. 8
  4022. 8
  4023. 8
  4024. 8
  4025. 8
  4026. 8
  4027. 8
  4028. 8
  4029. 8
  4030. 8
  4031. 8
  4032. 8
  4033. 8
  4034. 8
  4035. 8
  4036. 8
  4037. 8
  4038. 8
  4039. 8
  4040. 8
  4041. 8
  4042. 8
  4043. 8
  4044. 8
  4045. 8
  4046. 8
  4047. 8
  4048. 8
  4049. 8
  4050. 8
  4051. 8
  4052. 8
  4053. 8
  4054. 8
  4055. 8
  4056. 8
  4057. 8
  4058. 8
  4059. 8
  4060. 8
  4061. 8
  4062. 8
  4063. 8
  4064. 8
  4065. 8
  4066. 8
  4067. 8
  4068. 8
  4069. 8
  4070. 8
  4071. 8
  4072. 8
  4073. 8
  4074. 8
  4075. 8
  4076. 8
  4077. 8
  4078. 8
  4079. 8
  4080. 8
  4081. 8
  4082. 8
  4083. 8
  4084. 8
  4085. 8
  4086. 8
  4087. 8
  4088. 8
  4089. 8
  4090. 8
  4091. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    8
  4092. 8
  4093. 8
  4094. 8
  4095. 8
  4096. 8
  4097. 8
  4098. 8
  4099. 8
  4100. 8
  4101. 8
  4102. 8
  4103. 8
  4104. 8
  4105. 8
  4106. 8
  4107. 8
  4108. 8
  4109. 8
  4110. 8
  4111. 8
  4112. 8
  4113. 8
  4114. 8
  4115. 8
  4116. 8
  4117. 8
  4118. 8
  4119. 8
  4120. 8
  4121. 8
  4122. 8
  4123. 8
  4124. 8
  4125. 8
  4126. 8
  4127. 8
  4128. 8
  4129. 8
  4130. 8
  4131. 8
  4132. 8
  4133. 8
  4134. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    8
  4135. 8
  4136. 8
  4137. 8
  4138. 8
  4139. 8
  4140. 8
  4141. 8
  4142. 8
  4143. 8
  4144. 8
  4145. 8
  4146. 8
  4147. 8
  4148. By @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    8
  4149. 8
  4150. 8
  4151. 8
  4152. 8
  4153. 8
  4154. 8
  4155. How these all started...... During Tuesday's late parliamentary defense committee meeting, military officers related to the martial law declaration testified with some shocking details revealed. Commanders and military leaders have begun to testify during investigations into President Yoon's botched martial law order. Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the suspended chief of the Army Special Warfare Command said he was instructed to drag lawmakers out of the National Assembly while the order was in place. The comments were made during a parliamentary defense committee meeting that was held until late Tuesday night. "The president called me directly on a secure phone. He told me "The quorum doesn't appear to have been met yet. Break down the doors fast, go in, and drag out people inside." Though he received the order from Yoon, commanders on the ground resisted, and Kwak also figured their resistance was the correct action. He also believed it was not right for troops to go in, because of the chance of future criminal action and due to concerns of injuries if they forced their way in. Kwak said he ordered troops not to go any further before informing the ex-defense minister Kim Yong-hyun of his decision. Kwak also revealed, that he had knowledge of some details of the martial law plan two days ahead of Yoon's declaration on December 3rd. He said he received orders from then-Defense Minister Kim over a secure landline, to secure six locations. "I was given the mission to secure six locations, the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, the Democratic Party headquarters, and Flower Research, an opinion polling company, on around December 1st." After the order, Kwak says he only thought about what he would do if something actually happened, and did not tell the subordinate brigade commanders, as they could get into trouble. He only told them on the day they were actually being deployed. Meanwhile, there was also testimony from inside the Defense Counterintelligence Command. Brigade General Kim Dae-woo, chief of the Defense Counterintelligence Command’s investigation unit, said Commander Yeo In-hyung ordered him to check if a key military bunker had space to detain people inside. The B1 bunker, which is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Capital Defense Command, serves as the de facto wartime command center for Korea's military.
    8
  4156. 8
  4157. 8
  4158. 8
  4159. 8
  4160. 8
  4161. 8
  4162. 8
  4163. 8
  4164. 8
  4165. 8
  4166. 8
  4167. 8
  4168. 8
  4169. 8
  4170. 8
  4171. 8
  4172. 8
  4173. 8
  4174. 8
  4175. 8
  4176. 8
  4177. 8
  4178. 8
  4179. 8
  4180. 7
  4181. 7
  4182. 7
  4183. 7
  4184. 7
  4185. 7
  4186. 7
  4187. 7
  4188. 7
  4189. 7
  4190. 7
  4191. 7
  4192. 7
  4193. 7
  4194. 7
  4195. 7
  4196. 7
  4197. 7
  4198. 7
  4199. 7
  4200. 7
  4201. 7
  4202. 7
  4203. 7
  4204. 7
  4205. 7
  4206. 7
  4207. 7
  4208. 7
  4209. 7
  4210. 7
  4211. 7
  4212. 7
  4213. 7
  4214. 7
  4215. 7
  4216. 7
  4217. 7
  4218. 7
  4219. 7
  4220. 7
  4221. 7
  4222. 7
  4223. 7
  4224. 7
  4225. 7
  4226. 7
  4227. 7
  4228. 7
  4229. 7
  4230. 7
  4231. 7
  4232. 7
  4233. 7
  4234. 7
  4235. 7
  4236. 7
  4237. 7
  4238. 7
  4239. 7
  4240. 7
  4241. 7
  4242. 7
  4243. 7
  4244. 7
  4245. 7
  4246. 7
  4247. 7
  4248. 7
  4249. 7
  4250. 7
  4251. 7
  4252. 7
  4253. 7
  4254. 7
  4255. 7
  4256. 7
  4257. 7
  4258. 7
  4259. 7
  4260. 7
  4261. 7
  4262. 7
  4263. 7
  4264. 7
  4265. 7
  4266. 7
  4267. 7
  4268. 7
  4269. 7
  4270. 7
  4271. 7
  4272. 7
  4273. 7
  4274. 7
  4275. 7
  4276. 7
  4277. 7
  4278. 7
  4279. 7
  4280. 7
  4281. 7
  4282. 7
  4283. 7
  4284. 7
  4285. 7
  4286. 7
  4287. 7
  4288. 7
  4289. 7
  4290. 7
  4291. 7
  4292. 7
  4293. 7
  4294. 7
  4295. 7
  4296. 7
  4297. 7
  4298. 7
  4299. 7
  4300. 7
  4301. 7
  4302. 7
  4303. 7
  4304. 7
  4305. 7
  4306. 7
  4307. 7
  4308. 7
  4309. 7
  4310. 7
  4311. 7
  4312. 7
  4313. 7
  4314. 7
  4315. 7
  4316. 7
  4317. 7
  4318. 7
  4319. 7
  4320. 7
  4321. 7
  4322. 7
  4323. 7
  4324. 7
  4325. 7
  4326. 7
  4327. 7
  4328. 7
  4329. 7
  4330. 7
  4331. 7
  4332. 7
  4333. 7
  4334. 7
  4335. 7
  4336. 7
  4337. 7
  4338. 7
  4339. 7
  4340. 7
  4341. 7
  4342. 7
  4343. 7
  4344. 7
  4345. 7
  4346. 7
  4347. 7
  4348. 7
  4349. 7
  4350. 7
  4351. 7
  4352. 7
  4353. 7
  4354. 7
  4355. 7
  4356. 7
  4357. 7
  4358. 7
  4359. 7
  4360. 7
  4361. 7
  4362. 7
  4363. 7
  4364. 7
  4365. 7
  4366. 7
  4367. 7
  4368. 7
  4369. 7
  4370. 7
  4371. 7
  4372. 7
  4373. 7
  4374. 7
  4375. 7
  4376. 7
  4377. 7
  4378. 7
  4379. 7
  4380. 7
  4381. 7
  4382. 7
  4383. 7
  4384. 7
  4385. 7
  4386. 7
  4387. 7
  4388. 7
  4389. 7
  4390. 7
  4391. 7
  4392. 7
  4393. 7
  4394. 7
  4395. 7
  4396. 7
  4397. 7
  4398. 7
  4399. 7
  4400. 7
  4401. 7
  4402. 7
  4403. 7
  4404. 7
  4405. 7
  4406. 7
  4407. 7
  4408. 7
  4409. 7
  4410. 7
  4411. 7
  4412. 7
  4413. 7
  4414. 7
  4415. 7
  4416. 7
  4417. 7
  4418. 7
  4419. 7
  4420. 7
  4421. 7
  4422. 7
  4423. 7
  4424. 7
  4425. 7
  4426. 7
  4427. 7
  4428. 7
  4429. 7
  4430. 7
  4431. 7
  4432. 7
  4433. 7
  4434. 7
  4435. 7
  4436. 7
  4437. 7
  4438. 7
  4439. 7
  4440. 7
  4441. 7
  4442. 7
  4443. 7
  4444. 7
  4445. 7
  4446. 7
  4447. 7
  4448. 7
  4449. 7
  4450. 7
  4451. 7
  4452. 7
  4453. 7
  4454. 7
  4455. 7
  4456. 7
  4457. 7
  4458. 7
  4459. 7
  4460. 7
  4461. 7
  4462. 7
  4463. 7
  4464. 7
  4465. 7
  4466. 7
  4467. 7
  4468. 7
  4469. 7
  4470. 7
  4471. 7
  4472. 7
  4473. 7
  4474. 7
  4475. 7
  4476. 7
  4477. 7
  4478. 7
  4479. 7
  4480. 7
  4481. 7
  4482. 7
  4483. 7
  4484. 7
  4485. 7
  4486. 7
  4487. 7
  4488. 7
  4489. 7
  4490. 7
  4491. 7
  4492. 7
  4493. 7
  4494. 7
  4495. 7
  4496. 7
  4497. 7
  4498. 7
  4499. 7
  4500. 7
  4501. 7
  4502. 7
  4503. 7
  4504. 7
  4505. 7
  4506. 7
  4507. 7
  4508. 7
  4509. 7
  4510. 7
  4511. 7
  4512. 7
  4513. 7
  4514. 7
  4515. 7
  4516. 7
  4517. 7
  4518. 7
  4519. 7
  4520. 7
  4521. 7
  4522. 7
  4523. 7
  4524. 7
  4525. 7
  4526. 7
  4527. 7
  4528. 7
  4529. 7
  4530. 7
  4531. 7
  4532. 7
  4533. 7
  4534. 7
  4535. 7
  4536. 7
  4537. 7
  4538. 7
  4539. 7
  4540. 7
  4541. 7
  4542. 7
  4543. 7
  4544. 7
  4545. 7
  4546. 7
  4547. 7
  4548. 7
  4549. 7
  4550. 7
  4551. 7
  4552. 7
  4553. 7
  4554. 7
  4555. 7
  4556. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    7
  4557. 7
  4558. 7
  4559. 7
  4560. 7
  4561. 7
  4562. 7
  4563. 7
  4564. 7
  4565. 7
  4566. 7
  4567. 7
  4568. 7
  4569. 7
  4570. 7
  4571. 7
  4572. 7
  4573. 7
  4574. 7
  4575. 7
  4576. 7
  4577. 7
  4578. 7
  4579. 7
  4580. 7
  4581. 7
  4582. 7
  4583. 7
  4584. 7
  4585. 7
  4586. 7
  4587. 7
  4588. 7
  4589. 7
  4590. 7
  4591. 7
  4592. 7
  4593. 7
  4594. 7
  4595. 7
  4596. 7
  4597. 7
  4598. 7
  4599. 7
  4600. 7
  4601. 7
  4602. 7
  4603. 7
  4604. 7
  4605. 7
  4606. 7
  4607. 7
  4608. 7
  4609. 7
  4610. 7
  4611. 7
  4612. 7
  4613. 7
  4614. 7
  4615. 7
  4616. 7
  4617. 7
  4618. 7
  4619. 7
  4620. 7
  4621. 7
  4622. 7
  4623. 7
  4624. 7
  4625. 7
  4626. 7
  4627. 7
  4628. 7
  4629. 7
  4630. 7
  4631. 7
  4632. 7
  4633. 7
  4634. 7
  4635. 7
  4636. 7
  4637. 7
  4638. 7
  4639. 7
  4640. 7
  4641. 7
  4642. 7
  4643. 7
  4644. 7
  4645. 7
  4646. 7
  4647. 7
  4648. 7
  4649. 7
  4650. 7
  4651. 7
  4652. 7
  4653. 7
  4654. 7
  4655. 7
  4656. 7
  4657. 7
  4658. 7
  4659. 7
  4660. 7
  4661. 7
  4662. 7
  4663. 7
  4664. 7
  4665. 7
  4666. 7
  4667. 7
  4668. 7
  4669. 7
  4670. 7
  4671. 7
  4672. 7
  4673. 7
  4674. 7
  4675. 7
  4676. 7
  4677. 7
  4678. 7
  4679. 7
  4680. 7
  4681. 7
  4682. 7
  4683. 7
  4684. 7
  4685. 7
  4686. 7
  4687. 7
  4688. 7
  4689. 7
  4690. 7
  4691. 7
  4692. 7
  4693. 7
  4694. 7
  4695. 7
  4696. 7
  4697. 7
  4698. 7
  4699. 7
  4700. 7
  4701. 7
  4702. 7
  4703. 7
  4704. 7
  4705. 7
  4706. 7
  4707. 7
  4708. 7
  4709. 7
  4710. 7
  4711. 7
  4712. 7
  4713. 7
  4714. 7
  4715. 7
  4716. 7
  4717. 7
  4718. 7
  4719. 7
  4720. 7
  4721. 7
  4722. 7
  4723. 7
  4724. 7
  4725. 7
  4726. 7
  4727. 7
  4728. 7
  4729. 7
  4730. 7
  4731. 7
  4732. 7
  4733. 7
  4734. 7
  4735. 7
  4736. 7
  4737. 7
  4738. 7
  4739. 7
  4740. 7
  4741. 7
  4742. 7
  4743. 7
  4744. 7
  4745. 7
  4746. 7
  4747. 7
  4748. 7
  4749. 7
  4750. 7
  4751. 7
  4752. 7
  4753. 7
  4754. 7
  4755. 7
  4756. 7
  4757. 7
  4758. 7
  4759. 7
  4760. 7
  4761. 7
  4762. 7
  4763. Filipinos need to wake up and accept that none of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council have ever accepted any international court's ruling when it infringed their sovereignty or national security interests. The UK & US blatantly continue to defy both the UN and ICJ rulings that affirm Mauritius’ sovereignty over Diego Garcia (which the UK took by force). The overwhelming majority of sovereignty disputes were settled by military/ economic might or diplomatic negotiations. Only a small number settled by arbitration. Arbitration is only possible if BOTH parties consent to it. US, Australia and NATO interests do not align with Philippines or regional countries’ interests; they do not live in the region next to China. Western blood is too precious to spill for Filipino territorial ambitions. Beware of the American Military Industrial Complex bearing debt trap gifts. The world is littered with regions (eg Middle East) and countries (eg Ukraine) ravaged by proxy wars and conflict. Filipinos need to learn self-sufficiency. Spending 1% of GDP on defence is inadequate. Filipinos need to hold their government to account for the amount of corruption or incompetence in their naval procurement programs. Austal is one of the current contractors for new coastguard vessels. Austal has just been fined 24 million by the American DoJ for corruption. Go figure. That is why Filipinos haven’t got proper equipment to defend what they want to claim. Filipino leaders need courage and leadership to ignore populist nationalism and pursue effective solutions. Quiet diplomacy pursuing conciliation (eg Iceland and Norway) or joint development agreements of cooperation (eg Malaysia & Thailand in Gulf of Thailand gas fields). China does not lack political wisdom. In 1980, Deng Xiao Peng innovatively advocated “shelving differences and seeking joint development” to resolve territorial disputes with other countries. A policy that China still advocates for. Parties involved can choose not to decide which side has sovereignty over the disputed territory but shelve the dispute first. This does not mean giving up sovereignty, but simply putting the dispute aside for the time being so fishermen can fish peacefully and maybe even develop oil and gas fields jointly like Malaysia & Thailand.
    7
  4764. 7
  4765. 7
  4766. 7
  4767. 7
  4768. 7
  4769. 7
  4770. 7
  4771. 7
  4772. 7
  4773. 7
  4774. 7
  4775. 7
  4776. 7
  4777. 7
  4778. 7
  4779. 7
  4780. 7
  4781. 7
  4782. 7
  4783. 7
  4784. 7
  4785. 7
  4786. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    7
  4787. 7
  4788. 7
  4789. 7
  4790. 7
  4791. 7
  4792. 7
  4793. 7
  4794. 7
  4795. 7
  4796. 7
  4797. 7
  4798. 7
  4799. 7
  4800. 7
  4801. 7
  4802. 7
  4803. 7
  4804. 7
  4805. 7
  4806. 7
  4807. 7
  4808. 7
  4809. 7
  4810. 7
  4811. 7
  4812. 7
  4813. 7
  4814. 7
  4815. 7
  4816. 7
  4817. 7
  4818. 7
  4819. 7
  4820. 7
  4821. 7
  4822. 7
  4823. 7
  4824. 7
  4825. 7
  4826. 7
  4827. 7
  4828. 7
  4829. 7
  4830. 7
  4831. 7
  4832. 7
  4833. 7
  4834. 7
  4835. 7
  4836. 7
  4837. 7
  4838. 7
  4839. 7
  4840. 7
  4841. 7
  4842. 7
  4843. 7
  4844. 7
  4845. 7
  4846. 7
  4847. 7
  4848. 7
  4849. 7
  4850. 7
  4851. 7
  4852. 7
  4853. 7
  4854. 7
  4855. 7
  4856. 7
  4857. 7
  4858. 7
  4859. 7
  4860. 7
  4861. 7
  4862. 7
  4863. 7
  4864. 7
  4865. 7
  4866. 7
  4867. 7
  4868. 7
  4869. 7
  4870. 7
  4871. 7
  4872. 7
  4873. 7
  4874. 7
  4875. 7
  4876. 7
  4877. 7
  4878. 7
  4879. 7
  4880. 7
  4881. 7
  4882. 7
  4883. 7
  4884. 7
  4885. 7
  4886. 7
  4887. 7
  4888. 7
  4889. 7
  4890. 7
  4891. 7
  4892. 7
  4893. 7
  4894. 7
  4895. 7
  4896. 7
  4897. 7
  4898. 7
  4899. 7
  4900. 7
  4901. 7
  4902. 7
  4903. 7
  4904. 7
  4905. 7
  4906. 7
  4907. 7
  4908. 7
  4909. 7
  4910. 7
  4911. 7
  4912. 7
  4913. 7
  4914. 7
  4915. 6
  4916. 6
  4917. 6
  4918. 6
  4919. 6
  4920. 6
  4921. 6
  4922. 6
  4923. 6
  4924. 6
  4925. 6
  4926. 6
  4927. 6
  4928. 6
  4929. 6
  4930. 6
  4931. 6
  4932. 6
  4933. 6
  4934. 6
  4935. 6
  4936. 6
  4937. 6
  4938. 6
  4939. 6
  4940. 6
  4941. 6
  4942. 6
  4943. 6
  4944. 6
  4945. 6
  4946. 6
  4947. 6
  4948. 6
  4949. 6
  4950. 6
  4951. 6
  4952. 6
  4953. 6
  4954. 6
  4955. 6
  4956. 6
  4957. 6
  4958. 6
  4959. 6
  4960. 6
  4961. 6
  4962. 6
  4963. 6
  4964. 6
  4965. 6
  4966. 6
  4967. 6
  4968. 6
  4969. 6
  4970. 6
  4971. 6
  4972. 6
  4973. 6
  4974. 6
  4975. 6
  4976. 6
  4977. 6
  4978. 6
  4979. 6
  4980. 6
  4981. 6
  4982. 6
  4983. 6
  4984. 6
  4985. 6
  4986. 6
  4987. 6
  4988. 6
  4989. 6
  4990. 6
  4991. 6
  4992. 6
  4993. 6
  4994. 6
  4995. 6
  4996. 6
  4997. 6
  4998. 6
  4999. 6
  5000. 6
  5001. 6
  5002. 6
  5003. 6
  5004. 6
  5005. 6
  5006. 6
  5007. 6
  5008. 6
  5009. 6
  5010. 6
  5011. 6
  5012. 6
  5013. 6
  5014. 6
  5015. 6
  5016. 6
  5017. 6
  5018. 6
  5019. 6
  5020. 6
  5021. 6
  5022. 6
  5023. 6
  5024. 6
  5025. 6
  5026. 6
  5027. 6
  5028. 6
  5029. 6
  5030. 6
  5031. 6
  5032. 6
  5033. 6
  5034. 6
  5035. 6
  5036. 6
  5037. 6
  5038. 6
  5039. 😂😂😂 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    6
  5040. 6
  5041. 6
  5042. 6
  5043. 6
  5044. 6
  5045. 6
  5046. 6
  5047. 6
  5048. 6
  5049. 6
  5050. 6
  5051. 6
  5052. 6
  5053. 6
  5054. 6
  5055. 6
  5056. 6
  5057. 6
  5058. 6
  5059. 6
  5060. 6
  5061. 6
  5062. 6
  5063. 6
  5064. 6
  5065. 6
  5066. 6
  5067. 6
  5068. 6
  5069. 12-9-2023 Germany's Baerbock Humiliated In Dressing Down By Ukraine Foreign Minister Things took a turn at the joint presser when a journalist asked about the difficulties of the counteroffensive along the southern front, and posed whether Kubela thinks Kiev's Western backers should supply weapons like the Taurus "quicker and faster".... Kubela then explained he had pressed the German delegation for Taurus deliveries as soon as possible, but that Baerbock left him no "hope" in these meetings. He then in a smug and patronizing tone looked toward her and said: "No, she didn't go beyond the official position of the German government... but you'll do it anyway, it's just a matter of time." "You will do it anyway, its just a matter of time, and I don't understand why we are wasting time," Kuleba said in response to a question at a press conference. Kubula then described that more and more Ukrainian lives have been lost due to Western delays in weapons approval and deliveries. The suggestion was that it's Berlin's fault (and that of other slow to play along allies). Online commentators were quick to point out how "embarrassing" and "pathetic" the moment was for the German side. Others pointed out the "arrogance" on display by Kubela, given also she made the lengthy, dangerous trip into Kiev to announce new humanitarian aid. Such "gifts" weren't enough. One regional commentator had this to say in response to the clip: "So here we have a US protectorate (Germany) being publicly mocked by a US proxy (Ukraine). One of the pitfalls of military alignment — the interests of the alliance as defined by the alliance leader is always supreme."
    6
  5070. 6
  5071. 6
  5072. 6
  5073. 6
  5074. 6
  5075. 6
  5076. 6
  5077. 6
  5078. 6
  5079. 6
  5080. 6
  5081. 6
  5082. 6
  5083. 6
  5084. 6
  5085. 6
  5086. 6
  5087. 6
  5088. 6
  5089. 6
  5090. 6
  5091. 6
  5092. 6
  5093. 6
  5094. 6
  5095. 6
  5096. 6
  5097. 6
  5098. 6
  5099. 6
  5100. 6
  5101. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5102. 6
  5103. 6
  5104. 6
  5105. 6
  5106. 6
  5107. 6
  5108. 6
  5109. 6
  5110. 6
  5111. 6
  5112. 6
  5113. 6
  5114. 6
  5115. 6
  5116. 6
  5117. 6
  5118. 6
  5119. 6
  5120. 6
  5121. 6
  5122. 6
  5123. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5124. 6
  5125. 6
  5126. 6
  5127. 6
  5128. 6
  5129. 6
  5130. 6
  5131. 6
  5132. 6
  5133. 6
  5134. 6
  5135. 6
  5136. 6
  5137. 6
  5138. 6
  5139. 6
  5140. 6
  5141. 6
  5142. 6
  5143. 6
  5144. 6
  5145. 6
  5146. 6
  5147. 6
  5148. 6
  5149. 6
  5150. 6
  5151. 6
  5152. 6
  5153. 6
  5154. 6
  5155. 6
  5156. 6
  5157. 6
  5158. 6
  5159. 6
  5160. 6
  5161. 6
  5162. 6
  5163. 6
  5164. 6
  5165. 6
  5166. 6
  5167. 6
  5168. 6
  5169. 6
  5170. 6
  5171. 6
  5172. 6
  5173. 6
  5174. 6
  5175. 6
  5176. 6
  5177. 6
  5178. 6
  5179. 6
  5180. 6
  5181. 6
  5182. 6
  5183. 6
  5184. 6
  5185. 6
  5186. 6
  5187. 6
  5188. 6
  5189. 6
  5190. 6
  5191. 6
  5192. 6
  5193. 6
  5194. 6
  5195. 6
  5196. 6
  5197. 6
  5198. 6
  5199. 6
  5200. 6
  5201. 6
  5202. 6
  5203. 6
  5204. 6
  5205. 6
  5206. 6
  5207. 6
  5208. 6
  5209. 6
  5210. 6
  5211. 6
  5212. 6
  5213. 6
  5214. 6
  5215. 6
  5216. 6
  5217. 6
  5218. 6
  5219. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    6
  5220. 6
  5221. 6
  5222. 6
  5223. 6
  5224. 6
  5225. 6
  5226. 6
  5227. 6
  5228. 6
  5229. 6
  5230. 6
  5231. 6
  5232. 6
  5233. 6
  5234. 6
  5235. 6
  5236. 6
  5237. 6
  5238. 6
  5239. 6
  5240. 6
  5241. 6
  5242. 6
  5243. 6
  5244. 6
  5245. 6
  5246. 6
  5247. 6
  5248. 6
  5249. 6
  5250. 6
  5251. 6
  5252. 6
  5253. 6
  5254. 6
  5255. 6
  5256. 6
  5257. 6
  5258. 6
  5259. 6
  5260. 6
  5261. 6
  5262. 6
  5263. 6
  5264. 6
  5265. 6
  5266. 6
  5267. 6
  5268. 6
  5269. 6
  5270. 6
  5271. 6
  5272. 6
  5273. 6
  5274. 6
  5275. 6
  5276. 6
  5277. 6
  5278. 6
  5279. 6
  5280. 6
  5281. 6
  5282. 6
  5283. 6
  5284. 6
  5285. 6
  5286. 6
  5287. 6
  5288. 6
  5289. 6
  5290. 6
  5291. 6
  5292. 6
  5293. 6
  5294. 6
  5295. 6
  5296. 6
  5297. 6
  5298. 6
  5299. 6
  5300. 6
  5301. 6
  5302. 6
  5303. 6
  5304. 6
  5305. 6
  5306. 6
  5307. 6
  5308. 6
  5309. 6
  5310. 6
  5311. 6
  5312. 6
  5313. 6
  5314. 6
  5315. 6
  5316. 6
  5317. 6
  5318. 6
  5319. 6
  5320. 6
  5321. 6
  5322. 6
  5323. 6
  5324. 6
  5325. 6
  5326. 6
  5327. 6
  5328. 6
  5329. 6
  5330. 6
  5331. 6
  5332. 6
  5333. 6
  5334. 6
  5335. 6
  5336. 6
  5337. 6
  5338. 6
  5339. 6
  5340. 6
  5341. 6
  5342. 6
  5343. 6
  5344. 6
  5345. 6
  5346. 6
  5347. 6
  5348. 6
  5349. 6
  5350. 6
  5351. 6
  5352. 6
  5353. 6
  5354. 6
  5355. 6
  5356. 6
  5357. 6
  5358. 6
  5359. 6
  5360. 6
  5361. 6
  5362. 6
  5363. 6
  5364. 6
  5365. 6
  5366. 6
  5367. 6
  5368. 6
  5369. 6
  5370. 6
  5371. 6
  5372. 6
  5373. 6
  5374. 6
  5375. 6
  5376. 6
  5377. 6
  5378. 6
  5379. 6
  5380. 6
  5381. 6
  5382. 6
  5383. 6
  5384. 6
  5385. 6
  5386. 6
  5387. 6
  5388. 6
  5389. 6
  5390. 6
  5391. 6
  5392. 6
  5393. 6
  5394. 6
  5395. 6
  5396. 6
  5397. 6
  5398. 6
  5399. 6
  5400. 6
  5401. 6
  5402. 6
  5403.  @malgudidays3311  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5404. 6
  5405. 6
  5406. 6
  5407. 6
  5408. 6
  5409. 6
  5410. 6
  5411. 6
  5412. 6
  5413. 6
  5414. 6
  5415. 6
  5416. 6
  5417. 6
  5418. 6
  5419. 6
  5420. 6
  5421. 6
  5422. 6
  5423. 6
  5424. 6
  5425. 6
  5426. 6
  5427. 6
  5428. 6
  5429. 6
  5430. 6
  5431. 6
  5432. 6
  5433. 6
  5434. 6
  5435. 6
  5436. 6
  5437. 6
  5438. 6
  5439. 6
  5440. 6
  5441. 6
  5442. 6
  5443. 6
  5444. 6
  5445. 6
  5446. 6
  5447. 6
  5448. 6
  5449. 6
  5450. 6
  5451. 6
  5452. 6
  5453. 6
  5454. 6
  5455. 6
  5456. 6
  5457. 6
  5458. 6
  5459. 6
  5460. 6
  5461. 6
  5462. 6
  5463. 6
  5464. 6
  5465. 6
  5466. 6
  5467. 6
  5468. 6
  5469. 6
  5470. 6
  5471. 6
  5472. 6
  5473. 6
  5474. 6
  5475. 6
  5476. 6
  5477. 6
  5478. 6
  5479. 6
  5480. 6
  5481. 6
  5482. 6
  5483. 6
  5484. 6
  5485. 6
  5486. 6
  5487. 6
  5488. 6
  5489. 6
  5490. 6
  5491. 6
  5492. 6
  5493. 6
  5494. 6
  5495. 6
  5496. 6
  5497. 6
  5498. 6
  5499. 6
  5500. 6
  5501. 6
  5502. 6
  5503. 6
  5504. 6
  5505. 6
  5506. 6
  5507. 6
  5508. 6
  5509. 6
  5510. 6
  5511. 6
  5512. 6
  5513. 6
  5514. 6
  5515. 6
  5516. 6
  5517. 6
  5518. 6
  5519. 6
  5520. 6
  5521. 6
  5522. 6
  5523. 6
  5524. 6
  5525. 6
  5526. 6
  5527. 6
  5528. 6
  5529. 6
  5530. 6
  5531. 6
  5532. 6
  5533. 6
  5534. 6
  5535. 6
  5536. 6
  5537. 6
  5538. 6
  5539. 6
  5540. 6
  5541. 6
  5542. 6
  5543. 6
  5544. 6
  5545. 6
  5546. 6
  5547. 6
  5548. 6
  5549. 6
  5550. 6
  5551. 6
  5552. 6
  5553. 6
  5554. 6
  5555. 6
  5556. 6
  5557. 6
  5558. 6
  5559. 6
  5560. 6
  5561. 6
  5562. 6
  5563. 6
  5564. 6
  5565. 6
  5566. 6
  5567. 6
  5568. 6
  5569. 6
  5570. 6
  5571. 6
  5572. 6
  5573. 6
  5574. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5575. 6
  5576. 6
  5577. 6
  5578. 6
  5579. 6
  5580. 6
  5581. 6
  5582. 6
  5583. 6
  5584. 6
  5585. 6
  5586. 6
  5587. 6
  5588. 6
  5589. 6
  5590. How all these started..... During Tuesday's late parliamentary defense committee meeting, military officers related to the martial law declaration testified with some shocking details revealed. Commanders and military leaders have begun to testify during investigations into President Yoon's botched martial law order. Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the suspended chief of the Army Special Warfare Command said he was instructed to drag lawmakers out of the National Assembly while the order was in place. The comments were made during a parliamentary defense committee meeting that was held until late Tuesday night. "The president called me directly on a secure phone. He told me "The quorum doesn't appear to have been met yet. Break down the doors fast, go in, and drag out people inside." Though he received the order from Yoon, commanders on the ground resisted, and Kwak also figured their resistance was the correct action. He also believed it was not right for troops to go in, because of the chance of future criminal action and due to concerns of injuries if they forced their way in. Kwak said he ordered troops not to go any further before informing the ex-defense minister Kim Yong-hyun of his decision. Kwak also revealed, that he had knowledge of some details of the martial law plan two days ahead of Yoon's declaration on December 3rd. He said he received orders from then-Defense Minister Kim over a secure landline, to secure six locations. "I was given the mission to secure six locations, the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, the Democratic Party headquarters, and Flower Research, an opinion polling company, on around December 1st." After the order, Kwak says he only thought about what he would do if something actually happened, and did not tell the subordinate brigade commanders, as they could get into trouble. He only told them on the day they were actually being deployed. Meanwhile, there was also testimony from inside the Defense Counterintelligence Command. Brigade General Kim Dae-woo, chief of the Defense Counterintelligence Command’s investigation unit, said Commander Yeo In-hyung ordered him to check if a key military bunker had space to detain people inside. The B1 bunker, which is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Capital Defense Command, serves as the de facto wartime command center for Korea's military.
    6
  5591. 6
  5592. 6
  5593. 6
  5594. 6
  5595. 6
  5596. 6
  5597. 6
  5598. 6
  5599. 6
  5600. 6
  5601. 6
  5602. 6
  5603. 6
  5604. 6
  5605. 6
  5606. 6
  5607. 6
  5608. 6
  5609. 6
  5610. 6
  5611. 6
  5612. 6
  5613. 6
  5614. 6
  5615. 6
  5616. 6
  5617. 6
  5618. 6
  5619. 6
  5620. 6
  5621. 6
  5622. 6
  5623. 6
  5624. 6
  5625. 6
  5626. 6
  5627. 6
  5628. 6
  5629. 6
  5630. 6
  5631. 6
  5632. 6
  5633. 6
  5634. 6
  5635. 6
  5636. 6
  5637. 6
  5638. 6
  5639. 6
  5640. 6
  5641. 6
  5642. 6
  5643. 6
  5644. 6
  5645. 6
  5646. 6
  5647. 6
  5648. 6
  5649. 6
  5650. 6
  5651. 6
  5652. 6
  5653. 6
  5654. 6
  5655. 6
  5656. 6
  5657. 6
  5658. 6
  5659. 6
  5660. 6
  5661. 6
  5662. 6
  5663. 6
  5664. 6
  5665. 6
  5666. 6
  5667. 6
  5668. 6
  5669. 6
  5670. 6
  5671. 6
  5672. 6
  5673. 6
  5674. 6
  5675. 6
  5676. 6
  5677. 6
  5678. 6
  5679. 6
  5680. 6
  5681. 6
  5682. 6
  5683. 6
  5684. 6
  5685. 6
  5686. 6
  5687. 6
  5688. 6
  5689. 6
  5690. 6
  5691. 6
  5692. 6
  5693. 6
  5694. 6
  5695. 6
  5696. 6
  5697. 6
  5698. 6
  5699. 6
  5700. 6
  5701. 6
  5702. 6
  5703. 6
  5704. 6
  5705. 6
  5706. 6
  5707. 6
  5708. 6
  5709. 6
  5710. 6
  5711. 6
  5712. 6
  5713. 6
  5714. 6
  5715. 6
  5716. 6
  5717. 6
  5718. 6
  5719. 6
  5720. 6
  5721. 6
  5722. 6
  5723. 6
  5724. 6
  5725. 6
  5726. 6
  5727. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    6
  5728. 6
  5729. 6
  5730. 6
  5731. 6
  5732. 6
  5733. 6
  5734. 6
  5735. 6
  5736. 6
  5737. 6
  5738. 6
  5739. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    6
  5740. 6
  5741. 6
  5742. 6
  5743. 6
  5744. 6
  5745. 6
  5746. 6
  5747. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5748. 6
  5749. 6
  5750. 6
  5751. 6
  5752. 6
  5753. 6
  5754. 6
  5755. 6
  5756. 6
  5757. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    6
  5758. 6
  5759. 6
  5760. 6
  5761. 6
  5762. 6
  5763. 6
  5764. 6
  5765. 6
  5766. 6
  5767. 6
  5768. 6
  5769. 6
  5770. 6
  5771. 6
  5772. 6
  5773. 6
  5774. 6
  5775. 6
  5776. 6
  5777. 6
  5778. 6
  5779. 6
  5780. 6
  5781. 6
  5782. 6
  5783. 6
  5784. 6
  5785. 6
  5786. 6
  5787. 6
  5788. 6
  5789. 6
  5790. 6
  5791. 6
  5792. 6
  5793. 6
  5794. 6
  5795. 6
  5796. 6
  5797. 6
  5798. 6
  5799. 6
  5800. 6
  5801. 6
  5802. 6
  5803. 6
  5804. 6
  5805. 6
  5806. 6
  5807. 6
  5808. 6
  5809. 6
  5810. 6
  5811. 6
  5812. 6
  5813. 6
  5814. 6
  5815. 6
  5816. 6
  5817. 6
  5818. 6
  5819. 6
  5820. 6
  5821. 6
  5822. 6
  5823. 6
  5824. 6
  5825. 6
  5826. 6
  5827. 6
  5828. 6
  5829. 6
  5830. 6
  5831. 6
  5832. 6
  5833. 6
  5834. 6
  5835. 6
  5836. 6
  5837. 6
  5838. 6
  5839. 6
  5840. 6
  5841. 6
  5842. 6
  5843. 6
  5844. 6
  5845. 6
  5846. 6
  5847. 6
  5848. 6
  5849. 6
  5850. 6
  5851. 6
  5852. 6
  5853. 6
  5854. 6
  5855. 6
  5856. 6
  5857. 6
  5858. 6
  5859. 6
  5860. 6
  5861. 6
  5862. 6
  5863. 6
  5864. 6
  5865. 6
  5866. 6
  5867. 6
  5868. 6
  5869. 6
  5870. 6
  5871. 6
  5872. 6
  5873. 6
  5874. 6
  5875. 6
  5876. 6
  5877. 6
  5878. 6
  5879. 6
  5880. 6
  5881. 6
  5882. 6
  5883. 6
  5884. 6
  5885. 6
  5886. 6
  5887. 6
  5888. 6
  5889. 6
  5890. 6
  5891. 6
  5892. 6
  5893. 6
  5894. 6
  5895. 5
  5896. 5
  5897. 5
  5898. 5
  5899. 5
  5900. 5
  5901. 5
  5902. 5
  5903. 5
  5904. 5
  5905. 5
  5906. 5
  5907. 5
  5908. 5
  5909. 5
  5910. 5
  5911. 5
  5912. 5
  5913. 5
  5914. 5
  5915. 5
  5916. 5
  5917. 5
  5918. 5
  5919. 5
  5920. 5
  5921. 5
  5922. 5
  5923. 5
  5924. 5
  5925. 5
  5926. 5
  5927. 5
  5928. 5
  5929. 5
  5930. 5
  5931. 5
  5932. 5
  5933. 5
  5934. 5
  5935. 5
  5936. 5
  5937. 5
  5938. 5
  5939. 5
  5940. 5
  5941. 5
  5942. 5
  5943. 5
  5944. 5
  5945. 5
  5946. 5
  5947. 5
  5948. 5
  5949. 5
  5950. 5
  5951. 5
  5952. 5
  5953. 5
  5954. 5
  5955. 5
  5956. 5
  5957. 5
  5958. 5
  5959. 5
  5960. 5
  5961. 5
  5962. 5
  5963. 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg
    5
  5964. 5
  5965. 5
  5966. 5
  5967. 5
  5968. 5
  5969. 5
  5970. 5
  5971. 5
  5972. 5
  5973. 5
  5974. 5
  5975. 5
  5976. 5
  5977. 5
  5978. 5
  5979. 5
  5980. 5
  5981. 5
  5982. 5
  5983. 5
  5984. 5
  5985. 5
  5986. 5
  5987. 5
  5988. 5
  5989. 5
  5990. 5
  5991. 5
  5992. 5
  5993. 5
  5994. 5
  5995. 5
  5996. 5
  5997. 5
  5998. 5
  5999. 5
  6000. 5
  6001. 5
  6002. 5
  6003. 5
  6004. 5
  6005. 5
  6006. 5
  6007. 5
  6008. 5
  6009. 5
  6010. 5
  6011. 5
  6012. 5
  6013. 5
  6014. 5
  6015. 5
  6016. 5
  6017. 5
  6018. 5
  6019. 5
  6020. 5
  6021. 5
  6022. 5
  6023. 5
  6024. 5
  6025. 5
  6026. 5
  6027. 5
  6028. 5
  6029. 5
  6030. 5
  6031. 5
  6032. 5
  6033. 5
  6034. 5
  6035. 5
  6036. 5
  6037. 5
  6038. 5
  6039. 5
  6040. 5
  6041. 5
  6042. 5
  6043. 5
  6044. 5
  6045. 5
  6046. 5
  6047. 5
  6048. 5
  6049. 5
  6050. 5
  6051. 5
  6052. 5
  6053. 5
  6054. 5
  6055. 5
  6056. 5
  6057. 5
  6058. 5
  6059. 5
  6060. 5
  6061. 5
  6062. 5
  6063. 5
  6064. 5
  6065. 5
  6066. 5
  6067. 5
  6068. 5
  6069. 5
  6070. 5
  6071. 5
  6072. 5
  6073. 5
  6074. 5
  6075. 5
  6076. 5
  6077. 5
  6078. 5
  6079. 5
  6080. 5
  6081. 5
  6082. 5
  6083. 5
  6084. 5
  6085. 5
  6086. 5
  6087. 5
  6088. 5
  6089. 5
  6090. 5
  6091. 5
  6092. 5
  6093. 5
  6094. 5
  6095. 5
  6096. 5
  6097. 5
  6098. 5
  6099. 5
  6100. 5
  6101. 5
  6102. 5
  6103. 5
  6104. 5
  6105. 5
  6106. 5
  6107. 5
  6108. 5
  6109. 5
  6110. 5
  6111. 5
  6112. 5
  6113. 5
  6114. 5
  6115. 5
  6116. 5
  6117. 5
  6118. 5
  6119. 5
  6120. 5
  6121. 5
  6122. 5
  6123. 5
  6124. 5
  6125. 5
  6126. 5
  6127. 5
  6128. 5
  6129. 5
  6130. 5
  6131. 5
  6132. 5
  6133. 5
  6134. 5
  6135. 5
  6136. 5
  6137. 5
  6138. 5
  6139. 5
  6140. 5
  6141. 5
  6142. 5
  6143. 5
  6144. 5
  6145. 5
  6146. 5
  6147. 5
  6148. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    5
  6149. 5
  6150. 5
  6151. 5
  6152. 5
  6153. 5
  6154. 5
  6155. 5
  6156. 5
  6157. 5
  6158. 5
  6159. 5
  6160. 5
  6161. 5
  6162. 5
  6163. 5
  6164. 5
  6165. 5
  6166. 5
  6167. 5
  6168. 5
  6169. 5
  6170. 5
  6171. 5
  6172. 5
  6173. 5
  6174. 5
  6175. 5
  6176. 5
  6177. 5
  6178. 5
  6179. 5
  6180. 5
  6181. 5
  6182. 5
  6183. 5
  6184. 5
  6185. 5
  6186. 5
  6187. 5
  6188. 5
  6189. 5
  6190. 5
  6191. 5
  6192. 5
  6193. 5
  6194. 5
  6195. 5
  6196. 5
  6197. 5
  6198. 5
  6199. 5
  6200. 5
  6201. 5
  6202. 5
  6203. 5
  6204. 5
  6205. 5
  6206. 5
  6207. 5
  6208. 5
  6209. 5
  6210. 5
  6211. 5
  6212. 5
  6213. 5
  6214. 5
  6215. 5
  6216. 5
  6217. 5
  6218. 5
  6219. 5
  6220. 5
  6221.  @Scapestoat  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    5
  6222. 5
  6223. 5
  6224. 5
  6225. 5
  6226. 5
  6227. 5
  6228. 5
  6229. 5
  6230. 5
  6231. 5
  6232. 5
  6233. 5
  6234. 5
  6235. 5
  6236. 5
  6237. 5
  6238. 5
  6239. 5
  6240. 5
  6241. 5
  6242. 5
  6243. 5
  6244. 5
  6245. 5
  6246. 5
  6247. 5
  6248. 5
  6249. 5
  6250. 5
  6251. 5
  6252. 5
  6253. 5
  6254. 5
  6255. 5
  6256. 5
  6257. 5
  6258. 5
  6259. 5
  6260. 5
  6261. 5
  6262. 5
  6263. 5
  6264. 5
  6265. 5
  6266. 5
  6267. 5
  6268. 5
  6269. 5
  6270. 5
  6271. 5
  6272. 5
  6273. 5
  6274. 5
  6275. 5
  6276. 5
  6277. 5
  6278. 5
  6279. 5
  6280. 5
  6281. 5
  6282. 5
  6283. 5
  6284. 5
  6285. 5
  6286. 5
  6287. 5
  6288. 5
  6289. 5
  6290. 5
  6291. 5
  6292. 5
  6293. During Tuesday's late parliamentary defense committee meeting, military officers related to the martial law declaration testified with some shocking details revealed. Commanders and military leaders have begun to testify during investigations into President Yoon's botched martial law order. Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the suspended chief of the Army Special Warfare Command said he was instructed to drag lawmakers out of the National Assembly while the order was in place. The comments were made during a parliamentary defense committee meeting that was held until late Tuesday night. "The president called me directly on a secure phone. He told me "The quorum doesn't appear to have been met yet. Break down the doors fast, go in, and drag out people inside." Though he received the order from Yoon, commanders on the ground resisted, and Kwak also figured their resistance was the correct action. He also believed it was not right for troops to go in, because of the chance of future criminal action and due to concerns of injuries if they forced their way in. Kwak said he ordered troops not to go any further before informing the ex-defense minister Kim Yong-hyun of his decision. Kwak also revealed, that he had knowledge of some details of the martial law plan two days ahead of Yoon's declaration on December 3rd. He said he received orders from then-Defense Minister Kim over a secure landline, to secure six locations. "I was given the mission to secure six locations, the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, the Democratic Party headquarters, and Flower Research, an opinion polling company, on around December 1st." After the order, Kwak says he only thought about what he would do if something actually happened, and did not tell the subordinate brigade commanders, as they could get into trouble. He only told them on the day they were actually being deployed. Meanwhile, there was also testimony from inside the Defense Counterintelligence Command. Brigade General Kim Dae-woo, chief of the Defense Counterintelligence Command’s investigation unit, said Commander Yeo In-hyung ordered him to check if a key military bunker had space to detain people inside. The B1 bunker, which is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Capital Defense Command, serves as the de facto wartime command center for Korea's military.
    5
  6294. 5
  6295. 5
  6296. 5
  6297. 5
  6298. 5
  6299. 5
  6300. 5
  6301. 5
  6302. 5
  6303. 5
  6304. 5
  6305. 5
  6306. 5
  6307. 5
  6308. 5
  6309. 5
  6310. 5
  6311. 5
  6312. 5
  6313. 5
  6314. 5
  6315. 5
  6316. 5
  6317. 5
  6318. 5
  6319. 5
  6320. 5
  6321. 5
  6322. 5
  6323. 5
  6324. 5
  6325. 5
  6326. 5
  6327. 5
  6328. 5
  6329. 5
  6330. 5
  6331. 5
  6332. 5
  6333. 5
  6334. 5
  6335. 5
  6336. 5
  6337. 5
  6338. 5
  6339. 5
  6340. 5
  6341. 5
  6342. 5
  6343. 5
  6344. 5
  6345. 5
  6346. 5
  6347. 5
  6348. 5
  6349. 5
  6350. 5
  6351. 5
  6352. 5
  6353. 5
  6354. 5
  6355. 5
  6356. 5
  6357. 5
  6358. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    5
  6359. 5
  6360. 5
  6361. 5
  6362. 5
  6363. 5
  6364. 5
  6365. 5
  6366. 5
  6367. 5
  6368. 5
  6369. 5
  6370. 5
  6371. 5
  6372. 5
  6373. 5
  6374. 5
  6375. 5
  6376. 5
  6377. 5
  6378. 5
  6379. 5
  6380. 5
  6381. 5
  6382. 5
  6383. 5
  6384. 5
  6385. 5
  6386. 5
  6387. 5
  6388. 5
  6389. 5
  6390. 5
  6391. 5
  6392. 5
  6393. 5
  6394. 5
  6395. 5
  6396. 5
  6397. 5
  6398. 5
  6399. 5
  6400. 5
  6401. 5
  6402. 5
  6403. 5
  6404. 5
  6405. 5
  6406. 5
  6407. 5
  6408. 5
  6409. 5
  6410. 5
  6411. 5
  6412. 5
  6413. 5
  6414. 5
  6415. 5
  6416. 5
  6417. 5
  6418. 5
  6419. 5
  6420. 5
  6421. 5
  6422. 5
  6423. 5
  6424. 5
  6425. 5
  6426. 5
  6427. 5
  6428. 5
  6429. 5
  6430. 5
  6431. 5
  6432. 5
  6433. 5
  6434. 5
  6435. 5
  6436. 5
  6437. 5
  6438. 5
  6439. 5
  6440. 5
  6441. 5
  6442. 5
  6443. 5
  6444. 5
  6445. 5
  6446. 5
  6447. 5
  6448. 5
  6449. 5
  6450. 5
  6451. 5
  6452. 5
  6453. 5
  6454. 5
  6455. 5
  6456. 5
  6457. 5
  6458. 5
  6459. 5
  6460. 5
  6461. 5
  6462. 5
  6463. 5
  6464. 5
  6465. 5
  6466. 5
  6467. 5
  6468. 5
  6469. 5
  6470. 5
  6471. 5
  6472. 5
  6473. 5
  6474. 5
  6475. 5
  6476. 5
  6477. 5
  6478. 5
  6479. 5
  6480. 5
  6481. 5
  6482. 5
  6483. 5
  6484. 5
  6485. 5
  6486. 5
  6487. 5
  6488. 5
  6489. 5
  6490. 5
  6491. 5
  6492. 5
  6493. 5
  6494. 5
  6495. 5
  6496. 5
  6497. 5
  6498. 5
  6499. 5
  6500. 5
  6501. 5
  6502. 5
  6503. 5
  6504. 5
  6505. 5
  6506. 5
  6507. 5
  6508. 5
  6509. 5
  6510. 5
  6511. 5
  6512. 5
  6513. 5
  6514. 5
  6515. 5
  6516. 5
  6517. 5
  6518. 5
  6519. 5
  6520. 5
  6521. 5
  6522. 5
  6523. 5
  6524. 5
  6525. 5
  6526. 5
  6527. 5
  6528. 5
  6529. 5
  6530. 5
  6531. 5
  6532. 5
  6533. 5
  6534. 5
  6535. 5
  6536. 5
  6537. 5
  6538. 5
  6539. 5
  6540. 5
  6541. 5
  6542. 5
  6543. 5
  6544. 5
  6545. 5
  6546. 5
  6547. 5
  6548. 5
  6549. 5
  6550. 5
  6551. 5
  6552. 5
  6553. 5
  6554. 5
  6555. 5
  6556. 5
  6557. 5
  6558. 5
  6559. 5
  6560. 5
  6561. 5
  6562. 5
  6563. 5
  6564. 5
  6565. 5
  6566. 5
  6567. 5
  6568. 5
  6569. 5
  6570. 5
  6571. 5
  6572. 5
  6573. 5
  6574. 5
  6575. 5
  6576. 5
  6577. 5
  6578. 5
  6579. 5
  6580. 5
  6581. 5
  6582. 5
  6583. 5
  6584. 5
  6585. 5
  6586. 5
  6587. 5
  6588. 5
  6589. 5
  6590. 5
  6591. 5
  6592. 5
  6593. 5
  6594. 5
  6595. 5
  6596. 5
  6597. 5
  6598. 5
  6599. 5
  6600. 5
  6601. 5
  6602. 5
  6603. 5
  6604. 5
  6605. 5
  6606. 5
  6607. 5
  6608. 5
  6609. 5
  6610. 5
  6611. 5
  6612. 5
  6613. 5
  6614. 5
  6615. 5
  6616. 5
  6617. 5
  6618. 5
  6619. 5
  6620. 5
  6621. 5
  6622. 5
  6623. 5
  6624. 5
  6625. 5
  6626. 5
  6627. 5
  6628. 5
  6629. 5
  6630. 5
  6631. 5
  6632. 5
  6633. 5
  6634. 5
  6635. 5
  6636. 5
  6637. 5
  6638. 5
  6639. 5
  6640. 5
  6641. 5
  6642. 5
  6643. 5
  6644. 5
  6645. 5
  6646. 5
  6647. 5
  6648. 5
  6649. 5
  6650. 5
  6651. 5
  6652. 5
  6653. 5
  6654. 5
  6655. 5
  6656. 5
  6657. 5
  6658. 5
  6659. 5
  6660. 5
  6661. 5
  6662. 5
  6663. 5
  6664. 5
  6665. 5
  6666. 5
  6667. 5
  6668. 5
  6669. 5
  6670. 5
  6671. 5
  6672. 5
  6673. 5
  6674. 5
  6675. 5
  6676. 5
  6677. 5
  6678. 5
  6679. 5
  6680. 5
  6681. 5
  6682. 5
  6683. 5
  6684. 5
  6685. 5
  6686. 5
  6687. 5
  6688. 5
  6689. 5
  6690. 5
  6691. 5
  6692. 5
  6693. 5
  6694. 5
  6695. 5
  6696. 5
  6697. 5
  6698. 5
  6699. 5
  6700. 5
  6701. 5
  6702. 5
  6703. 5
  6704. 5
  6705. 5
  6706. 5
  6707. 5
  6708. 5
  6709. 5
  6710. 5
  6711. 5
  6712. 5
  6713. 5
  6714. 5
  6715. 5
  6716. 5
  6717. 5
  6718. 5
  6719. 5
  6720. 5
  6721. 5
  6722. 5
  6723. 5
  6724. 5
  6725. 5
  6726. 5
  6727. 5
  6728. 5
  6729. 5
  6730. 5
  6731. 5
  6732. 5
  6733. 5
  6734. 5
  6735. 5
  6736. 5
  6737. 5
  6738. 5
  6739. 5
  6740. 5
  6741. 5
  6742. 5
  6743. 5
  6744. 5
  6745. 5
  6746. 5
  6747. 5
  6748. 5
  6749. 5
  6750. 5
  6751. 5
  6752. 5
  6753. 5
  6754. 5
  6755. 5
  6756. 5
  6757. 5
  6758. 5
  6759. 5
  6760. 5
  6761. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    5
  6762. 5
  6763. 5
  6764. 5
  6765. 5
  6766. 5
  6767. 5
  6768. 5
  6769. 5
  6770. 5
  6771. 5
  6772. 5
  6773. 5
  6774. 5
  6775. 5
  6776. 5
  6777. 5
  6778. 5
  6779. 5
  6780. 5
  6781. 5
  6782. 5
  6783. 5
  6784. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    5
  6785. 5
  6786. 5
  6787. 5
  6788. 5
  6789. 5
  6790. 5
  6791. 5
  6792. 5
  6793. 5
  6794. 5
  6795. 5
  6796. 5
  6797. 5
  6798. 5
  6799. 5
  6800. 5
  6801. 5
  6802. 5
  6803. 5
  6804. 5
  6805. 5
  6806. 5
  6807. 5
  6808. 5
  6809. 5
  6810. 5
  6811. 5
  6812. 5
  6813. 5
  6814. 5
  6815. 5
  6816. 5
  6817. 5
  6818. 5
  6819. 5
  6820. 5
  6821. 5
  6822. 5
  6823. 5
  6824. 5
  6825. 5
  6826. 5
  6827. 5
  6828. 5
  6829. 5
  6830. 5
  6831. 5
  6832. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    5
  6833. 5
  6834. 5
  6835. 5
  6836. 5
  6837. 5
  6838. 5
  6839. 5
  6840. 5
  6841. 5
  6842. 5
  6843. 5
  6844. 5
  6845. 5
  6846. 5
  6847. 5
  6848. 5
  6849. 5
  6850. 5
  6851. 5
  6852. 5
  6853. 5
  6854. 5
  6855. 5
  6856. 5
  6857. 5
  6858. 5
  6859. 5
  6860. 5
  6861. 5
  6862. 5
  6863. 5
  6864. 5
  6865. 5
  6866. 5
  6867. 5
  6868. 5
  6869. 5
  6870. 5
  6871. 5
  6872. 5
  6873. 5
  6874. 5
  6875. 5
  6876. 5
  6877. 5
  6878. 5
  6879. 5
  6880. 5
  6881. 5
  6882. 5
  6883. 5
  6884. 5
  6885. 5
  6886. 5
  6887. 5
  6888. 5
  6889. 5
  6890. 5
  6891. 5
  6892. 5
  6893. 5
  6894. 5
  6895. 5
  6896. 5
  6897. 5
  6898. 5
  6899. 5
  6900. 5
  6901. 5
  6902. 5
  6903. 5
  6904. 5
  6905. 5
  6906. 5
  6907. 5
  6908. 5
  6909. 5
  6910. 5
  6911. 5
  6912. 5
  6913. 5
  6914. 5
  6915. 5
  6916. 5
  6917. 5
  6918. 5
  6919. 5
  6920. 5
  6921. 5
  6922. 5
  6923. 5
  6924. 5
  6925. 5
  6926. 5
  6927. 5
  6928. 5
  6929. 5
  6930. 5
  6931. 5
  6932. 5
  6933. 5
  6934. 5
  6935. 5
  6936. 5
  6937. 5
  6938. 5
  6939. 5
  6940. 5
  6941. 5
  6942. 5
  6943. 5
  6944. 5
  6945. 5
  6946. 5
  6947. 5
  6948. 5
  6949. 5
  6950. 5
  6951. 5
  6952. 5
  6953. 5
  6954. 5
  6955. 5
  6956. 5
  6957. 5
  6958. 5
  6959. 5
  6960. 5
  6961. 5
  6962. 5
  6963. 5
  6964. 5
  6965. 5
  6966. 5
  6967. 5
  6968. 5
  6969. 5
  6970. 5
  6971. 5
  6972. 5
  6973. 5
  6974. 5
  6975. 5
  6976. 5
  6977. 5
  6978. 5
  6979. 5
  6980. 5
  6981. 5
  6982. 5
  6983. 5
  6984. 5
  6985. 5
  6986. 5
  6987. 5
  6988. 5
  6989. 5
  6990. 5
  6991. 5
  6992. 5
  6993. 5
  6994. 5
  6995. 5
  6996. 5
  6997. 5
  6998. 5
  6999. 5
  7000. 5
  7001. 5
  7002. 5
  7003. 5
  7004. 5
  7005. 5
  7006. 5
  7007. 5
  7008. 5
  7009. 5
  7010. 5
  7011. 5
  7012. 5
  7013. 5
  7014. 5
  7015. 5
  7016. 5
  7017. 5
  7018. 5
  7019. 5
  7020. 5
  7021. 5
  7022. 5
  7023. 5
  7024. 5
  7025. 5
  7026. 5
  7027. 5
  7028. 5
  7029. 5
  7030. 5
  7031. 5
  7032. 5
  7033. 5
  7034. 5
  7035. 5
  7036. 5
  7037. 5
  7038. 5
  7039. 5
  7040. 5
  7041. 5
  7042. 5
  7043. 5
  7044. 5
  7045. 5
  7046. 5
  7047. 5
  7048. 5
  7049. 5
  7050. 5
  7051. 5
  7052. 5
  7053. 5
  7054. 5
  7055. 5
  7056. 5
  7057. 5
  7058. 5
  7059. 5
  7060. 5
  7061. 5
  7062. 5
  7063. 5
  7064. 5
  7065. 5
  7066. 5
  7067. 5
  7068. 5
  7069. 5
  7070. 5
  7071. 5
  7072. 5
  7073. 5
  7074. 5
  7075. 5
  7076. 5
  7077. 5
  7078. 5
  7079. 5
  7080. 5
  7081. 5
  7082. 5
  7083. 5
  7084. 5
  7085. 5
  7086. 5
  7087. 5
  7088. 5
  7089. 5
  7090. 5
  7091. 5
  7092. 5
  7093. 5
  7094. 5
  7095. 5
  7096. 5
  7097. 5
  7098. 5
  7099. 5
  7100. 5
  7101. 5
  7102. 5
  7103. 5
  7104. 5
  7105. 5
  7106. 5
  7107. 5
  7108. 5
  7109. 5
  7110. 5
  7111. 5
  7112. 5
  7113. 5
  7114. 5
  7115. 5
  7116. 5
  7117. 5
  7118. 5
  7119. 5
  7120. 5
  7121. 5
  7122. 5
  7123. 5
  7124. 5
  7125. 5
  7126. 5
  7127. 5
  7128. 5
  7129. 5
  7130. 5
  7131. 5
  7132. 5
  7133. 5
  7134. 5
  7135. 5
  7136. 5
  7137. 5
  7138. 5
  7139. 5
  7140. 5
  7141. 5
  7142. 5
  7143. 5
  7144. 5
  7145. 5
  7146. 5
  7147. 5
  7148. 5
  7149. 5
  7150. 5
  7151. 5
  7152. 5
  7153. 5
  7154. 5
  7155. 5
  7156. 5
  7157. 5
  7158. 5
  7159. 5
  7160. 5
  7161. 5
  7162. 5
  7163. 5
  7164. 5
  7165. 5
  7166. 5
  7167. 5
  7168. 5
  7169. 5
  7170. 5
  7171. 5
  7172. 5
  7173. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    5
  7174. 5
  7175. 5
  7176. 5
  7177. 5
  7178. 5
  7179. 5
  7180. 5
  7181. 5
  7182. 5
  7183. 5
  7184. 5
  7185. 5
  7186. 5
  7187. 5
  7188. 5
  7189. 5
  7190. 5
  7191. 5
  7192. 5
  7193. 5
  7194. 5
  7195. 5
  7196. 5
  7197. 5
  7198. 5
  7199. 5
  7200. 5
  7201. 5
  7202. 5
  7203. 5
  7204. 5
  7205. 5
  7206. 5
  7207. 5
  7208. 5
  7209. 5
  7210. 5
  7211. 5
  7212. 5
  7213. 5
  7214. 5
  7215. 5
  7216. 5
  7217. 5
  7218. 5
  7219. 5
  7220. 5
  7221. 5
  7222. 5
  7223. 5
  7224. 5
  7225. 5
  7226. 5
  7227. 5
  7228. 5
  7229. 5
  7230. 5
  7231. 5
  7232. 5
  7233. 5
  7234. 5
  7235. 5
  7236. 5
  7237. 5
  7238. 5
  7239. 5
  7240. 5
  7241. 5
  7242. 5
  7243. 5
  7244. 5
  7245. 5
  7246. 5
  7247. 5
  7248. 5
  7249. 5
  7250. 5
  7251. 5
  7252. 5
  7253. 5
  7254. 5
  7255. 5
  7256. 5
  7257. 5
  7258. 5
  7259. 5
  7260. 5
  7261. 5
  7262. 5
  7263. 5
  7264. 5
  7265. 5
  7266. 5
  7267. 5
  7268. 5
  7269. 5
  7270. 5
  7271. 5
  7272. 5
  7273. 5
  7274. 5
  7275. 5
  7276. 5
  7277. 5
  7278. 5
  7279. 5
  7280. 5
  7281. 5
  7282. 5
  7283. 5
  7284. 5
  7285. 5
  7286. 5
  7287. 5
  7288. 5
  7289. 5
  7290. 5
  7291. 5
  7292. 5
  7293. 5
  7294. 5
  7295. 5
  7296. 5
  7297. 5
  7298. 5
  7299. 5
  7300. 5
  7301. 5
  7302. 5
  7303. 5
  7304. 5
  7305. 5
  7306. 5
  7307. 5
  7308. 5
  7309. 5
  7310. 5
  7311. 5
  7312. 5
  7313. 5
  7314. 5
  7315. 5
  7316. 5
  7317. 5
  7318. 5
  7319. 5
  7320. 5
  7321. 5
  7322. 5
  7323. 5
  7324. 5
  7325. 5
  7326. 5
  7327. 5
  7328. 5
  7329. 5
  7330. 5
  7331. 5
  7332. 5
  7333. 5
  7334. 5
  7335. 5
  7336. 5
  7337. 5
  7338. 5
  7339. 5
  7340. 5
  7341. 5
  7342. 5
  7343. 5
  7344. 5
  7345. 5
  7346. 5
  7347. 5
  7348. 5
  7349. 5
  7350. 5
  7351. 5
  7352. 5
  7353. 5
  7354. 5
  7355. 5
  7356. 5
  7357. 5
  7358. 5
  7359. 5
  7360. 5
  7361. 5
  7362. 5
  7363. 5
  7364. 5
  7365. 5
  7366. 5
  7367. 5
  7368. 5
  7369. 5
  7370. 5
  7371. 5
  7372. 5
  7373. 5
  7374. 5
  7375. 5
  7376. 5
  7377. 5
  7378. 5
  7379. 5
  7380. 5
  7381. 5
  7382. 5
  7383. 5
  7384. 5
  7385. 5
  7386. 5
  7387. 5
  7388. 5
  7389. 5
  7390. 5
  7391. 5
  7392. 5
  7393. 5
  7394. 5
  7395. 5
  7396. 5
  7397. 5
  7398. 5
  7399. 5
  7400. 5
  7401. 5
  7402. 5
  7403. 5
  7404. 5
  7405. 5
  7406. 5
  7407. 5
  7408. 5
  7409. 5
  7410. 5
  7411. 5
  7412. 5
  7413. 5
  7414. 5
  7415. 5
  7416. 5
  7417. 5
  7418. 5
  7419. 5
  7420. 5
  7421. 5
  7422. 5
  7423. 5
  7424. 5
  7425. 5
  7426. 5
  7427. 4
  7428. 4
  7429. 4
  7430. 2023-7-3 UN: India sells arms to junta while claiming concern over crisis in Myanmar. Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    4
  7431. 4
  7432. 4
  7433. 4
  7434. 4
  7435. 4
  7436. 4
  7437. 4
  7438. 4
  7439. 4
  7440. 4
  7441. 4
  7442. 4
  7443. 4
  7444. 4
  7445. 4
  7446. 4
  7447. 4
  7448. 4
  7449. 4
  7450. 4
  7451. 4
  7452. 4
  7453. 4
  7454. 4
  7455. 4
  7456. 4
  7457. 4
  7458. 4
  7459. 4
  7460. 4
  7461. 4
  7462. 4
  7463. 4
  7464. 4
  7465. 4
  7466. 4
  7467. 4
  7468. 4
  7469. 4
  7470. 4
  7471. 4
  7472. 4
  7473. 4
  7474. 4
  7475. 4
  7476. 4
  7477. 4
  7478. 4
  7479. 4
  7480. 4
  7481. 4
  7482. 4
  7483. 4
  7484. 4
  7485. 4
  7486. 4
  7487. 4
  7488. 4
  7489. 4
  7490. 4
  7491. 4
  7492. 4
  7493. 4
  7494. 4
  7495. 4
  7496. 4
  7497. 4
  7498. 4
  7499. 4
  7500. 4
  7501. 4
  7502. 4
  7503. 4
  7504. 4
  7505. 4
  7506. 4
  7507. 4
  7508. 4
  7509. 4
  7510. 4
  7511. 4
  7512. 4
  7513. 4
  7514. 4
  7515. 4
  7516. 4
  7517. 4
  7518. 4
  7519. 4
  7520. 4
  7521. 4
  7522. 4
  7523. 4
  7524. 4
  7525. 4
  7526. 4
  7527. 4
  7528. 4
  7529. 4
  7530. 4
  7531. 4
  7532. 4
  7533. 4
  7534. 4
  7535. 4
  7536. 4
  7537. 4
  7538. 4
  7539. 4
  7540. 4
  7541. 4
  7542. 4
  7543. 4
  7544. 4
  7545. 4
  7546. 4
  7547. 4
  7548. 4
  7549. 4
  7550. 4
  7551. 4
  7552. 4
  7553. 4
  7554. 4
  7555. 4
  7556. 4
  7557. 4
  7558. 4
  7559. 4
  7560. 4
  7561. 4
  7562. 4
  7563. 4
  7564. 4
  7565. 4
  7566. 4
  7567. 4
  7568. 4
  7569. 4
  7570. 4
  7571. 4
  7572. 4
  7573. 4
  7574. 4
  7575. 4
  7576. 4
  7577. 4
  7578. 4
  7579. 4
  7580. 4
  7581. 4
  7582. 4
  7583. 4
  7584. 4
  7585. 4
  7586. 4
  7587. 4
  7588. 4
  7589. 4
  7590. 4
  7591. 4
  7592. 4
  7593. 4
  7594. 4
  7595. 4
  7596. 4
  7597. 4
  7598. 4
  7599. 4
  7600. 4
  7601. 4
  7602. 4
  7603. 4
  7604. 4
  7605. 4
  7606. 4
  7607. 4
  7608. 4
  7609. 4
  7610. 4
  7611. 4
  7612. 4
  7613. 4
  7614. 4
  7615. 4
  7616. 4
  7617. Mutually beneficial cooperation between China and Germany is not a "risk" The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the industrial and supply chains of China and Germany are deeply intertwined and the markets of the two countries are highly interdependent. Mutually beneficial cooperation between China and Germany is not a "risk", but a guarantee for the stability of bilateral relations and an opportunity to create a future. Whether it is traditional fields such as machinery manufacturing and automobiles, or emerging fields such as green transformation, digitalization, and artificial intelligence, the two countries have huge potential for win-win cooperation that needs to be tapped. Both sides should carry forward the distinctive characteristics of mutual benefit and win-win, achieve each other's achievements, and China's exports Electric vehicles, lithium batteries, photovoltaic products, etc. have not only enriched global supply and alleviated global inflation pressure, but also made great contributions to the global response to climate change and green and low-carbon transformation. Both China and Germany are based on industry and both support free trade and economic globalization. Both sides should be wary of the rise of protectionism, adhere to a market perspective and a global perspective, and proceed from economic laws, look at production capacity issues objectively and dialectically, and explore more cooperation. It is also said that China adheres to the basic national policy of opening up to the outside world and hopes that Germany will provide a fair, transparent, open and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises to develop in Germany.
    4
  7618. 4
  7619. 4
  7620. 4
  7621. 4
  7622. 4
  7623. 4
  7624. 4
  7625. 4
  7626. 4
  7627. 4
  7628. 4
  7629. 4
  7630. 4
  7631. 4
  7632. 4
  7633. 4
  7634. 4
  7635. 4
  7636. 4
  7637. 4
  7638. 4
  7639. 4
  7640. 4
  7641. 4
  7642. 4
  7643. 4
  7644. 4
  7645. 4
  7646. 4
  7647. 4
  7648. 4
  7649. 4
  7650. 4
  7651. 4
  7652. 4
  7653. 4
  7654. 4
  7655. 4
  7656. 4
  7657. 4
  7658. 4
  7659. 4
  7660. 4
  7661. 4
  7662. 4
  7663. 4
  7664. 4
  7665. 4
  7666. 4
  7667. 4
  7668. 4
  7669. 4
  7670. 4
  7671. 4
  7672. 4
  7673. 4
  7674. 4
  7675. 4
  7676. 4
  7677. 4
  7678. 4
  7679. 4
  7680. 4
  7681. 4
  7682. 4
  7683. 4
  7684. 4
  7685. 4
  7686. 4
  7687. 4
  7688. 4
  7689. 4
  7690. 4
  7691. 4
  7692. 4
  7693. 4
  7694. 4
  7695. 4
  7696. 4
  7697. 4
  7698. 4
  7699. 4
  7700. 4
  7701. 4
  7702. 4
  7703. 4
  7704. 4
  7705. 4
  7706. 4
  7707. 4
  7708. 4
  7709. 4
  7710. 4
  7711. 4
  7712. 4
  7713. 4
  7714. 4
  7715. 4
  7716. 4
  7717. 4
  7718. 4
  7719. 4
  7720. 4
  7721. 4
  7722. 4
  7723. 4
  7724. 4
  7725. 4
  7726. 4
  7727. 4
  7728. 4
  7729. 4
  7730. 4
  7731. 4
  7732. 4
  7733. 4
  7734. 4
  7735. 4
  7736. 4
  7737. 4
  7738. 4
  7739. 4
  7740. 4
  7741. 4
  7742. 4
  7743. 4
  7744. 4
  7745. 4
  7746. 4
  7747. 4
  7748. 4
  7749. 4
  7750. 4
  7751. 4
  7752. 4
  7753. 4
  7754. 4
  7755. 4
  7756. 4
  7757. 4
  7758. 4
  7759. 4
  7760. 4
  7761. 4
  7762. 4
  7763. 4
  7764. 4
  7765. 4
  7766. 4
  7767. 4
  7768. 4
  7769. 4
  7770. 4
  7771. 4
  7772. 4
  7773. 4
  7774. 4
  7775. 4
  7776. 4
  7777. 4
  7778. 4
  7779. 4
  7780. 4
  7781. 4
  7782. 4
  7783. 4
  7784. 4
  7785. 4
  7786. 4
  7787. 4
  7788. 4
  7789. 4
  7790. 4
  7791. 4
  7792. 4
  7793. 4
  7794. 4
  7795. 4
  7796. 4
  7797. 4
  7798. 4
  7799. 4
  7800. 4
  7801. 4
  7802. 4
  7803. 4
  7804. 4
  7805. 4
  7806. 4
  7807. 4
  7808. 4
  7809. 4
  7810. 4
  7811. 4
  7812. 4
  7813. 4
  7814. 4
  7815. 4
  7816. 4
  7817. 4
  7818. 4
  7819. 4
  7820. 4
  7821. 4
  7822. 4
  7823. 4
  7824. 4
  7825. 4
  7826. 4
  7827. 4
  7828. 4
  7829. 4
  7830. 4
  7831. 4
  7832. 4
  7833. 4
  7834. 4
  7835. 4
  7836. 4
  7837. 4
  7838. 4
  7839. 4
  7840. 4
  7841. 4
  7842. 4
  7843. 4
  7844. 4
  7845. 4
  7846. 4
  7847. 4
  7848. 4
  7849. 4
  7850. 4
  7851. 4
  7852. 4
  7853. 4
  7854. 4
  7855. 4
  7856. 4
  7857. 4
  7858. 4
  7859. 4
  7860. 4
  7861. 4
  7862. 4
  7863. 4
  7864. 4
  7865. 4
  7866. 4
  7867. 4
  7868. 4
  7869. 4
  7870. 4
  7871. 4
  7872. 4
  7873. 4
  7874. 4
  7875. 4
  7876. 4
  7877. 4
  7878. 4
  7879. 4
  7880. 4
  7881. 4
  7882. 4
  7883. 4
  7884. 4
  7885. 4
  7886. 4
  7887. 4
  7888. 4
  7889. 4
  7890. 4
  7891. 4
  7892. 4
  7893. 4
  7894. 4
  7895. 4
  7896. 4
  7897. 4
  7898. 4
  7899. 4
  7900. 4
  7901. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  7902. 4
  7903. 4
  7904. 4
  7905. 4
  7906. 4
  7907. 4
  7908. 4
  7909. 4
  7910. 4
  7911. 4
  7912. 这些“太阳花”的神人 如今丑闻加身 2014年爆发的“太阳花学运”,彻底改变了台湾的政治生态,也造就无数“神人”形象。但神话总有破灭之时,从“学运”带头者陈为廷、到“太阳花女王”刘乔安、“学运翻译哥”王年恺等人,或因被踢爆不堪过去的往事,或因官司缠身入狱,“神人”地位早已不再。 20日,“太阳花神人”跌入凡间案例,再添一桩。当年在网络上声援学运而声名大噪的律师吕秋远,日前被曝光劈腿丑闻,让岛内各界又大跌眼镜。究竟哪些“神人”落入凡间? “廷帆二神”陈为廷 公车上对女乘客“袭胸” 被称为“太阳花学运”带头者的陈为廷,一直具有绿营背景。2014年,他与“黑岛青”等社团成员发起占领“立法院”,展开“太阳花学运”,与林飞帆共同担任“学运”领袖,并称“廷神”“帆神”,一度被年轻族群视为偶像。 同年12月,陈为廷宣布参选2015年苗栗县“立委”补选,但不久就被起底爆料,陈为廷曾涉嫌性骚扰丑闻,甚至在公车上对女乘客公然“袭胸”,遭到舆论挞伐,不得已在月底宣布退选。 “太阳花女神”刘乔安 下海卖淫被抓 刘乔安本名刘依函,2014年到“立法院”外声援“学运”时,因外型靓丽,被网友拍下照片在网络疯传,更因此获得“太阳花女王”等封号。不过人红是非多,刘乔安在同年年底被媒体爆料从事“援交行为”,对此,刘乔安反指控媒体涉嫌妨害秘密,谎称自己是去饭店卖酒,没有援交行为。事后检方拆穿了刘乔安谎言,今年4月,刘乔安因伪证罪遭台北地院判刑3月、不得易科罚金。 刘乔安得知判刑结果后,哭诉“不想再上诉,我不会挣扎,会进去关”!参加“太阳花学运”已让她的人生彻底变调。 “翻译哥”王年恺上传前女友性爱影片 台大外语系毕业的王年恺利用外语特长,在“太阳花学运”期间担任翻译要角,所有对外公开声明、新闻稿都出自他之手。但因不满前女友与他分手,王年恺竟将两人交往时拍下的性爱影片上传网络,然后又刻意用亲友脸书将影片网址传给前女友,企图栽赃嫁祸他人,并涉嫌公布前女友的个人隐私。最后,其前女友愤而报警,查出王年恺恶行。 王年恺期初在被捕后辩称电脑遭黑客攻击,但大量事实面前,王年恺坦承犯案,最后遭台北地院判处5个月徒刑,得易科罚金,缓刑2年,期间必须服120小时义务劳务。 “正义医生”柳林玮 原来是侵占捐款的骗子 在“太阳花学运”中起到推波助澜作用的柳林玮,此前一直从事医生职业,曾因陆军下士洪仲丘疑似在军中受虐致死,与网友发起“公民1985行动联盟”。但2015年6月,柳林玮被“1985行动联盟”向台北地检署告发,指控涉嫌侵占联盟募款近30万(新台币,下同),柳林玮反驳“绝非事实”,但不久后即承认犯行。 台北地检署同年月底依侵占罪将柳林玮缓起诉,期限2年,条件是支付公库40万元,并从事义诊相关之义务劳务60小时。 “网红律师”吕秋远劈腿 被当过街老鼠 律师吕秋远在“太阳花学运”期间多次发表力挺文章,在网络走红。后来吕秋远开始在脸书上对两性话题涉猎颇多,赢得不少女粉丝青睐,脸书粉丝高达57万人。 日前,吕秋远被媒体爆料,一名女子称曾和他交往,后来发现吕长年和一名萧姓女检察官过从甚密,最后只好分手,但存留两人交往的甜蜜短信。不仅如此,吕秋远还被拍到周旋在一名人妻和女粉丝之间,引发社会一片哗然。 针对丑闻,吕秋远声称“自己百分百单身,但婚姻状况是个人私事,无法回应”。而劈腿一事被踢爆后,吕秋远过去关于劈腿、两性关系、外遇等丑闻,逐一挖出来。彼时“网红律师”变成过街老鼠,真是狼狈不堪。
    4
  7913. 4
  7914. 4
  7915. 4
  7916. 4
  7917. 4
  7918. 4
  7919. 4
  7920. 4
  7921. 4
  7922. 4
  7923. 4
  7924. 4
  7925. 4
  7926. 4
  7927. 4
  7928. 4
  7929. 4
  7930. 4
  7931. 4
  7932. 4
  7933. 4
  7934. 4
  7935. 4
  7936. 4
  7937. 4
  7938. 4
  7939. 4
  7940. 4
  7941. 4
  7942. 4
  7943. 4
  7944. 4
  7945. 4
  7946. 4
  7947. 4
  7948. 4
  7949. 4
  7950. 4
  7951. 4
  7952. 4
  7953. 4
  7954. 4
  7955. 4
  7956. 4
  7957. 4
  7958. 4
  7959. 4
  7960. 4
  7961. 4
  7962. 4
  7963. 4
  7964. 4
  7965. 4
  7966. 4
  7967. 4
  7968. 4
  7969. 4
  7970. 4
  7971. 4
  7972. 4
  7973. 4
  7974. 4
  7975. 4
  7976. 4
  7977. 4
  7978. 4
  7979. 4
  7980. 4
  7981. 4
  7982. 4
  7983. 4
  7984. 4
  7985. 4
  7986. 4
  7987. 4
  7988. 4
  7989. 4
  7990. 4
  7991. 4
  7992. 4
  7993. 4
  7994. 4
  7995. 4
  7996. 4
  7997. 4
  7998. 4
  7999. 4
  8000. 4
  8001. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  8002. 4
  8003. 4
  8004. 4
  8005. 4
  8006. 4
  8007. 4
  8008. 4
  8009. 4
  8010. 4
  8011. 4
  8012. 4
  8013. 4
  8014. 4
  8015. 4
  8016. 4
  8017. 4
  8018. 4
  8019. 4
  8020. 4
  8021. 4
  8022. 4
  8023. 4
  8024. 4
  8025. 4
  8026. 4
  8027. 4
  8028. 4
  8029. 4
  8030. 4
  8031. 4
  8032. 4
  8033. 4
  8034. 4
  8035. 4
  8036. 4
  8037. 4
  8038. 4
  8039. 4
  8040. 4
  8041. 4
  8042. 4
  8043. 4
  8044. 4
  8045. 4
  8046. 4
  8047. 4
  8048. 4
  8049. 4
  8050. 4
  8051. 4
  8052. 4
  8053. 4
  8054. 4
  8055. 4
  8056. 4
  8057. 4
  8058. 4
  8059. 4
  8060. 4
  8061. 4
  8062. 4
  8063. 4
  8064. 4
  8065. 4
  8066. 4
  8067. 4
  8068. 4
  8069. 4
  8070. 4
  8071. 4
  8072. 4
  8073. 4
  8074. 4
  8075. 4
  8076. 4
  8077. 4
  8078. 4
  8079. 4
  8080. 4
  8081. 4
  8082. 4
  8083. 4
  8084. 4
  8085. 4
  8086. 4
  8087. 4
  8088. 4
  8089. 4
  8090. 4
  8091. 4
  8092. 4
  8093. 4
  8094. 4
  8095. 4
  8096. 4
  8097. 4
  8098. 4
  8099. 4
  8100. 4
  8101. 4
  8102. 4
  8103. 4
  8104. 4
  8105. 4
  8106. 4
  8107. 4
  8108. 4
  8109. 4
  8110. 4
  8111. 4
  8112. 4
  8113. 4
  8114. 4
  8115. 4
  8116. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    4
  8117. 4
  8118. 4
  8119. 4
  8120. 4
  8121. 4
  8122. 4
  8123. 4
  8124. 4
  8125. 4
  8126. 4
  8127. 4
  8128. 4
  8129. 4
  8130. 4
  8131. 4
  8132. 4
  8133. 4
  8134. 4
  8135. 4
  8136. 4
  8137. 4
  8138. 4
  8139. 4
  8140. 4
  8141. 4
  8142. 4
  8143. 4
  8144. 4
  8145. 4
  8146. 4
  8147. 4
  8148. 4
  8149. 4
  8150. 4
  8151. 4
  8152. 4
  8153. 4
  8154. 4
  8155. 4
  8156. 4
  8157. 4
  8158. 4
  8159. 4
  8160. 4
  8161. 4
  8162. 4
  8163. 4
  8164. 4
  8165. 4
  8166. 4
  8167. 4
  8168. 4
  8169. 4
  8170. 4
  8171. 4
  8172. 4
  8173. 4
  8174. 4
  8175. 4
  8176. 4
  8177. 4
  8178. 4
  8179. 4
  8180. 4
  8181. 4
  8182. 4
  8183. 4
  8184. 4
  8185. 4
  8186. 4
  8187. 4
  8188. 4
  8189. 4
  8190. 4
  8191. 4
  8192. 4
  8193. 4
  8194. 4
  8195. 4
  8196. 4
  8197. 4
  8198. 4
  8199. 4
  8200. 4
  8201. 4
  8202. 4
  8203. 4
  8204. 4
  8205. 4
  8206. 4
  8207. 4
  8208. 4
  8209. 4
  8210. 4
  8211. 4
  8212. 4
  8213. 4
  8214. 4
  8215. 4
  8216. 4
  8217. 4
  8218. 4
  8219. 4
  8220. 4
  8221. 4
  8222. 4
  8223. 4
  8224. 4
  8225. 4
  8226. 4
  8227. 4
  8228. 4
  8229. 4
  8230. 4
  8231. 4
  8232. 4
  8233. 4
  8234. 4
  8235. 4
  8236. 4
  8237. 4
  8238. 4
  8239. 4
  8240. 4
  8241. 4
  8242. 4
  8243. 4
  8244. 4
  8245. 4
  8246. 4
  8247. 4
  8248. 4
  8249. 4
  8250. 4
  8251. 4
  8252. 4
  8253. 4
  8254. 4
  8255. 4
  8256. 4
  8257. 4
  8258. 4
  8259. 4
  8260. 4
  8261. 4
  8262. 4
  8263. 4
  8264. 4
  8265. 4
  8266. 4
  8267. 4
  8268. 4
  8269. 4
  8270. 4
  8271. 4
  8272. 4
  8273. 4
  8274. 4
  8275. 4
  8276. 4
  8277. 4
  8278. 4
  8279. 4
  8280. 4
  8281. 4
  8282. 4
  8283. 4
  8284. 4
  8285. 4
  8286. 4
  8287. 4
  8288. 4
  8289. 4
  8290. 4
  8291. 4
  8292. 4
  8293. Olaf Scholz visit to China stirs up controversy but emphasizes cooperation. The political circles evaluate Scholz's visit to China this time as actually further strengthening economic relations and are more harmonious. His return to China after completing his visit to China aroused widespread controversy and criticism in German political and economic circles. On the one hand, the Green Party, which is ideologically anti-China, and the Free Democratic Party, which mainly represents small and medium-sized enterprises, accused his visit being threaten by 12 CEOs of big companies to kowtow China to seek benefits. However, within the Social Democratic Party, the extreme right and the extreme left supported Scholz's trip, believing that it could stabilize the precarious German economy; there were also strong public voices supporting his trip, believing that it would express to the world that Germany and China had established a Consensus, efforts should be made to end the Russia-Ukraine war. Since the Green Party and the Liberal Democratic Party take a pro-American stance and believe that China exports a large number of state-subsidized goods to the EU, such as electric vehicles and green energy technology products, the political and economic stance on China within the coalition government is divided. German automakers Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Volkswagen, as well as companies such as Siemens and Bayer insist on moving closer to China. However, since 2018, German small and medium-sized enterprises have been increasingly threatened by powerful Chinese competitors and have tended to support the government's implementation of protective policies and "decouple" starts again. However, the German government has decided to pursue the policy of "de-risking" rather than "decouple" with China established last year. It also recognizes that China is more important to Germany than Germany is to China.
    4
  8294. 4
  8295. 4
  8296. 4
  8297. 4
  8298. 4
  8299. 4
  8300. 4
  8301. 4
  8302. 4
  8303. 4
  8304. 4
  8305. 4
  8306. 4
  8307. 4
  8308. 4
  8309. 4
  8310. 4
  8311. 4
  8312. 4
  8313. 4
  8314. 4
  8315. 4
  8316. 4
  8317. 4
  8318. 4
  8319. 4
  8320. 4
  8321. 4
  8322. 4
  8323. 4
  8324. 4
  8325. 4
  8326. 4
  8327. 4
  8328. 4
  8329. 4
  8330. 4
  8331. 4
  8332. 4
  8333. 4
  8334. 4
  8335. 4
  8336. 4
  8337. 4
  8338. 4
  8339. 4
  8340. 4
  8341. 4
  8342. 4
  8343. 4
  8344. 4
  8345. 4
  8346. 4
  8347. 4
  8348. 4
  8349. 4
  8350. 4
  8351. 4
  8352. 4
  8353. 4
  8354. 4
  8355. 4
  8356. 4
  8357. 4
  8358. 4
  8359. 4
  8360. 4
  8361. 4
  8362. 4
  8363. 4
  8364. 4
  8365. 4
  8366. 4
  8367. 4
  8368. 4
  8369. 4
  8370. 4
  8371. 4
  8372. 4
  8373. 4
  8374. 4
  8375. 4
  8376. 4
  8377. 4
  8378. 4
  8379. 4
  8380. 4
  8381. 4
  8382. 4
  8383. 4
  8384. 4
  8385. 4
  8386. 4
  8387. 4
  8388. 4
  8389. 4
  8390. 4
  8391. 4
  8392. 4
  8393. 4
  8394. 4
  8395. 4
  8396. 4
  8397. 4
  8398. 4
  8399. 4
  8400. 4
  8401. 4
  8402. 4
  8403. 4
  8404. 4
  8405. Thousands people joined a demonstration in Okinawa's prefectural capital on Feb. 26 to protest the Japanese government's plans to build up its defense capabilities on a group of islands in the country's south for a possible contingency in Taiwan. The national government is moving forward with plans to bolster the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) and deploy missiles on the Nansei Islands including Okinawa amid concerns of contingencies. Participants in the demonstration in Naha voiced opposition, with one saying, "I want the government to hold thorough dialogue to ease tensions with the neighboring country." The group's 69-year-old executive committee chairperson Takamatsu Gushiken, who has worked for many years to recover the remains of those who perished in the Battle of Okinawa toward the end of the Pacific War, told the rally, "Militarization is being pushed forward at such a speed that it does not leave leeway for the people of Okinawa to think. We must not resort to shelters or evacuation, but choose to stop Okinawa from becoming a battlefield." Hiromori Shimoji, cohead of a resident group opposing the deployment of missiles on Miyako Island, which hosts a missile unit, commented, "The GSDF camp is in an area close to residential homes, and the ammunition depot is also near the community. If something happens, residents would not be able to survive it." After the gathering, participants marched through the streets of Naha while holding signs reading, "Don't make the islands into battlefields!" and "No more military bases."
    4
  8406. 4
  8407. 4
  8408. 4
  8409. 4
  8410. 4
  8411. 4
  8412. 4
  8413. 4
  8414. 4
  8415. 4
  8416. 4
  8417. 4
  8418. 4
  8419. 4
  8420. 4
  8421. 4
  8422. 4
  8423. 4
  8424. 4
  8425. 4
  8426. 4
  8427. 4
  8428. 4
  8429. 4
  8430. 4
  8431. 4
  8432. 4
  8433. 4
  8434. 4
  8435. 4
  8436. 4
  8437. 4
  8438. 4
  8439. 4
  8440. 4
  8441. 4
  8442. 4
  8443. 4
  8444. 4
  8445. 4
  8446. 4
  8447. 4
  8448. 4
  8449. 4
  8450. 4
  8451. 4
  8452. 4
  8453. 4
  8454. 4
  8455. 4
  8456. 4
  8457. 4
  8458. 4
  8459. 4
  8460. 4
  8461. 4
  8462. 4
  8463. 4
  8464. 4
  8465. 4
  8466. 4
  8467. 4
  8468. 4
  8469. 4
  8470. 4
  8471. 4
  8472. 4
  8473. 4
  8474. 4
  8475. 4
  8476. 4
  8477. 4
  8478. 4
  8479. 4
  8480. 4
  8481. 4
  8482. 4
  8483. 4
  8484. 4
  8485. 4
  8486. 4
  8487. 4
  8488. 4
  8489. 4
  8490. 4
  8491. 4
  8492. 4
  8493. 4
  8494. 4
  8495. 4
  8496. 4
  8497. 4
  8498. 4
  8499. 4
  8500. 4
  8501. 4
  8502. 4
  8503. 4
  8504. 4
  8505. 4
  8506. 4
  8507. 4
  8508. 4
  8509. 4
  8510. 4
  8511. 4
  8512. 4
  8513. 4
  8514. 4
  8515. 4
  8516. 4
  8517. 4
  8518. 4
  8519. 4
  8520. 4
  8521. 4
  8522. 4
  8523. 4
  8524. 4
  8525. 4
  8526. 4
  8527. 4
  8528. 4
  8529. 4
  8530. 4
  8531. 4
  8532. 4
  8533. 4
  8534. 4
  8535. 4
  8536. 4
  8537. 4
  8538. 4
  8539. 4
  8540. 4
  8541. 4
  8542. 4
  8543. 4
  8544. 4
  8545. 4
  8546. 4
  8547. 4
  8548. 4
  8549. 4
  8550. 4
  8551. 4
  8552. 4
  8553. 4
  8554. 4
  8555. 4
  8556. 4
  8557. 4
  8558. 4
  8559. 4
  8560. 4
  8561. 4
  8562. 4
  8563. 4
  8564. 4
  8565. 4
  8566. 4
  8567. 4
  8568. 4
  8569. 4
  8570. 4
  8571. 4
  8572. 4
  8573. 4
  8574. 4
  8575. 4
  8576. 4
  8577. 4
  8578. 4
  8579. 4
  8580. 4
  8581. 4
  8582. 4
  8583. 4
  8584. 4
  8585. 4
  8586. 4
  8587. 4
  8588. 4
  8589. 4
  8590. 4
  8591. 4
  8592. 4
  8593. 4
  8594. 4
  8595. 4
  8596. 4
  8597. 4
  8598. 4
  8599. 4
  8600. 4
  8601. 4
  8602. 4
  8603. 4
  8604. 4
  8605. 4
  8606. 4
  8607. 4
  8608. 4
  8609. 4
  8610. 4
  8611. 4
  8612. 4
  8613. 4
  8614. 4
  8615. 4
  8616. 4
  8617. 4
  8618. 4
  8619. 4
  8620. 4
  8621. 4
  8622. 4
  8623. 4
  8624. 4
  8625. 4
  8626. 4
  8627. 4
  8628. 4
  8629. 4
  8630. 4
  8631. 4
  8632. 4
  8633. 4
  8634. 4
  8635. 4
  8636. 4
  8637. 4
  8638. 4
  8639. 4
  8640. 4
  8641. 4
  8642. 4
  8643. 4
  8644. 4
  8645. 4
  8646. 4
  8647. 4
  8648. 4
  8649. 4
  8650. 4
  8651. 4
  8652. 4
  8653. 4
  8654. 4
  8655. 4
  8656. 4
  8657. 4
  8658. 4
  8659. 4
  8660. 4
  8661. 4
  8662. 4
  8663. 4
  8664. 4
  8665. 4
  8666. 4
  8667. 4
  8668. 4
  8669. 4
  8670. 4
  8671. 4
  8672. 4
  8673. 4
  8674. 4
  8675. 4
  8676. 4
  8677. 4
  8678. 4
  8679. 4
  8680. 4
  8681. 4
  8682. 4
  8683. 4
  8684. 4
  8685. 4
  8686. 4
  8687. 4
  8688. 4
  8689. 4
  8690. 4
  8691. 4
  8692. 4
  8693. 4
  8694. 4
  8695. 4
  8696. 4
  8697. 4
  8698. 4
  8699. 4
  8700. 4
  8701. 4
  8702. 4
  8703. 4
  8704. 4
  8705. 4
  8706. 4
  8707. 4
  8708. 4
  8709. 4
  8710. 4
  8711. 4
  8712. 4
  8713. 4
  8714. 4
  8715. 4
  8716. 4
  8717. 4
  8718. 4
  8719. 4
  8720. 4
  8721. 4
  8722. 4
  8723. 4
  8724. 4
  8725. 4
  8726. 4
  8727. 4
  8728. 4
  8729. 4
  8730. 4
  8731. 4
  8732. 4
  8733. 4
  8734. 4
  8735. 4
  8736. 4
  8737. 4
  8738. 4
  8739. 4
  8740. 4
  8741. 4
  8742. 4
  8743. 4
  8744. 4
  8745. 4
  8746. 4
  8747. 4
  8748. 4
  8749. 4
  8750. 4
  8751. 4
  8752. 4
  8753. 4
  8754. 4
  8755. 4
  8756. 4
  8757. 4
  8758. 4
  8759. 4
  8760. 4
  8761. 4
  8762. 4
  8763. 4
  8764. 4
  8765. 4
  8766. 4
  8767. 4
  8768. 4
  8769. 4
  8770. 4
  8771. 4
  8772. 4
  8773. 4
  8774. 4
  8775. 4
  8776. 4
  8777. 4
  8778. 4
  8779. 4
  8780. 4
  8781. 4
  8782. 4
  8783. 4
  8784. 4
  8785. 4
  8786. 4
  8787. 4
  8788. 4
  8789. 4
  8790. 4
  8791. 4
  8792. 4
  8793. 4
  8794. 4
  8795. 4
  8796. 4
  8797. 4
  8798. 4
  8799. 4
  8800. 4
  8801. 4
  8802. 4
  8803. 4
  8804. 4
  8805. 4
  8806. 4
  8807. 4
  8808. 4
  8809. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  8810. 4
  8811. 4
  8812. 4
  8813. 4
  8814. 4
  8815. 4
  8816. 4
  8817. 4
  8818. 4
  8819. 4
  8820. 4
  8821. 4
  8822. 4
  8823. 4
  8824. 4
  8825. 4
  8826. 4
  8827. 4
  8828. 4
  8829. 4
  8830. 4
  8831. 4
  8832. 4
  8833. 4
  8834. 4
  8835. 4
  8836. 4
  8837. 4
  8838. 4
  8839. 4
  8840. 4
  8841. 4
  8842. 4
  8843. 4
  8844. 4
  8845. 4
  8846. 4
  8847. 4
  8848. 4
  8849. 4
  8850. 4
  8851. 4
  8852. 4
  8853. 4
  8854. 4
  8855. 4
  8856. 4
  8857. 4
  8858. 4
  8859. 4
  8860. 4
  8861. 4
  8862. 4
  8863. 4
  8864. 4
  8865. 4
  8866. 4
  8867. 4
  8868. 4
  8869. 4
  8870. 4
  8871. 4
  8872. 4
  8873. 4
  8874. 4
  8875. 4
  8876. 4
  8877. 4
  8878. 4
  8879. 4
  8880. 4
  8881. 4
  8882. 4
  8883. 4
  8884. 4
  8885. 4
  8886. 4
  8887. 4
  8888. 4
  8889. 4
  8890. 4
  8891. 4
  8892. 4
  8893. 4
  8894. 4
  8895. 4
  8896. 4
  8897. 4
  8898. 4
  8899. 4
  8900. 4
  8901. 4
  8902. 4
  8903. 4
  8904. 4
  8905. 4
  8906. 4
  8907. 4
  8908. 4
  8909. 4
  8910. 4
  8911. 4
  8912. 4
  8913. 4
  8914. 4
  8915. 4
  8916. 4
  8917. 4
  8918. 4
  8919. 4
  8920. 4
  8921. 4
  8922. 4
  8923. 4
  8924. 4
  8925. 4
  8926. 4
  8927. 4
  8928. 4
  8929. 4
  8930. 4
  8931. 4
  8932. 4
  8933. 4
  8934. 4
  8935. 4
  8936. 4
  8937. 4
  8938. 4
  8939. 4
  8940. 4
  8941. 4
  8942. 4
  8943. 4
  8944. 4
  8945. 4
  8946. 4
  8947. 4
  8948. 4
  8949. 4
  8950. 4
  8951. 4
  8952. 4
  8953. 4
  8954. 4
  8955. 4
  8956. 4
  8957. 4
  8958. 4
  8959. 4
  8960. 4
  8961. 4
  8962. 4
  8963. 4
  8964. 4
  8965. 4
  8966. 4
  8967. 4
  8968. 4
  8969. 4
  8970. 4
  8971. 4
  8972. 4
  8973. 4
  8974. 4
  8975. 4
  8976. 4
  8977. 4
  8978. 4
  8979. 4
  8980. 4
  8981. 4
  8982. 4
  8983. 4
  8984. 4
  8985. 4
  8986. 4
  8987. 4
  8988. 4
  8989. 4
  8990. 4
  8991. 4
  8992. 4
  8993. 4
  8994. 4
  8995. 4
  8996. 4
  8997. 4
  8998. 4
  8999. 4
  9000. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  9001. 4
  9002. 4
  9003. 4
  9004. 4
  9005. 4
  9006. 4
  9007. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    4
  9008. 4
  9009. 4
  9010. 4
  9011. 4
  9012. 4
  9013. 4
  9014. 4
  9015. 4
  9016. 4
  9017. 4
  9018. 4
  9019. 4
  9020. 4
  9021. 4
  9022. 4
  9023. 4
  9024. 4
  9025. 4
  9026. 4
  9027. 4
  9028. 4
  9029. 4
  9030. 4
  9031. 4
  9032. 4
  9033. 4
  9034. 4
  9035. 4
  9036. 4
  9037. 4
  9038. 4
  9039. 4
  9040. 4
  9041. 4
  9042. 4
  9043. 4
  9044. 4
  9045. 4
  9046. 4
  9047. 4
  9048. 4
  9049. 4
  9050. Q: In your speech, you established per se the century of Asia, and then concluded with optimism. So Asian century is with us; we want to remain positive. However, I was impressed by your presentation — by the US-China rivalry, and ASEAN does not want to take any side, and no one would like to see a new Cold War. You mentioned all these and that was really impressive. Regarding that, I would like to widen my first question. Nikkei had an interview with Deputy Prime Minister Wong; in that interview, you said that our policy is neither pro-US nor pro-China, so could you elaborate this further please? In relation to this, US is asking ASEAN to choose either democracy or autocracy. Unfortunately, Singapore has not been invited to the US-hosted Democracy Summit two years in a row. I was wondering if you have any opinion about that as well, please. DPM: Thank you. Singapore does not choose countries. We chose principles and one key principle is that of territorial integrity and sovereignty, as well as the freedom for countries not to be attacked by others as enshrined in the United Nations Charter. Over the years, Singapore has consistently chosen and adhered to this fundamental principle. Whenever conflicts or issues arise, you can look at our track record, we have consistently adopted this stance and most recently, of course, when Russia invaded Ukraine. We hope that through our consistent actions, everyone knows what Singapore stands for. You may disagree with us and that is fine because there will always be differences in views between countries. But through our consistent, predictable and principled actions, we hope that we can be a more reliable and trusted partner for countries everywhere around the world. The other question that was asked was on the Democracy Summit, let me share my perspective on this. We know who we are – the facts about our democracy speak for themselves. We are comfortable with who we are, and we really do not need external parties or external events to validate our status. If you ask: does Singapore have the characteristics of other Western liberal democracies? The answer is not all (the characteristics). And in fact, we do not blindly copy what others do. We adapt and learn, and we apply and develop a model that is suitable for our needs, our own circumstances, and that model has worked so far and has delivered good outcomes. In fact, surveys will indicate – and these are surveys done by external parties – that there is a high level of trust in the elected government in Singapore; there is a high level of trust for public agencies and for institutions like the police, the media, and the judiciary. So this is a system that works well for us. We will continue to develop it; the system is not static. It will continue to evolve, but how it evolves will ultimately depend on Singaporeans, not external parties. We will have to determine our own fate. And I have no doubt that if my party, the ruling party – me and my team – if we do not deliver, if we fall short of the standards and expectations that Singaporeans have of us, they may well choose alternative candidates to form the next government. So that is Singapore. But the point raised has a broader issue because it is not just about Singapore. If you look around the world, there are diverse nation states, very complex nation states, all with their own deep cultures and long histories. Many have developed their own governance and political systems over time. Not every country has universal suffrage like Singapore. But if you were to do a survey of these countries, I think in quite a number of them, they will tell you the majority of the people will be quite happy with their systems, rather than to have external parties impose their values, their systems on them. And I think they need to respect that. So, the reality is that we live in a more complex world, far more complex world that cannot be easily distilled into binary labels. And I think rather than have such frameworks that split the world or divide the world into opposing hands, it is far more important for us to find ways for countries to build common cause with one another, to coexist and work together despite our differences. And I know that that is something that Japan has been focusing on as part of its G7 presidency and Singapore fully supports such efforts to strengthen multilateralism and build a rules-based global order.
    4
  9051. 4
  9052. 4
  9053. 4
  9054. 4
  9055. 4
  9056. 4
  9057. 4
  9058. 4
  9059. 4
  9060. 4
  9061. 4
  9062. 4
  9063. 4
  9064. 4
  9065. 4
  9066. 4
  9067. 4
  9068. 4
  9069. 4
  9070. 4
  9071. 4
  9072. 4
  9073. 4
  9074. 4
  9075. 4
  9076. 4
  9077. 4
  9078. 4
  9079. 4
  9080. 4
  9081. 4
  9082. 4
  9083. 4
  9084. 4
  9085. 4
  9086. 4
  9087. 4
  9088. 4
  9089. 4
  9090. 4
  9091. 4
  9092. 4
  9093. 4
  9094. 4
  9095. 4
  9096. 4
  9097. 4
  9098. 4
  9099. 4
  9100. 4
  9101. 4
  9102. 4
  9103. 4
  9104. 4
  9105. 4
  9106. 4
  9107. 4
  9108. 4
  9109. 4
  9110. 4
  9111. 4
  9112. 4
  9113. 4
  9114. 4
  9115. 4
  9116. 4
  9117. 4
  9118. 4
  9119. 4
  9120. 4
  9121. 4
  9122. 4
  9123. 4
  9124. 4
  9125. 4
  9126. 4
  9127. 4
  9128. 4
  9129. 4
  9130. 4
  9131. 4
  9132. 4
  9133. 4
  9134. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  9135. 4
  9136. 4
  9137. 4
  9138. 4
  9139. 4
  9140. 4
  9141. 4
  9142. 4
  9143. 4
  9144. 4
  9145. 4
  9146. 4
  9147. 4
  9148. 4
  9149. 4
  9150. 4
  9151. 4
  9152. 4
  9153. 4
  9154. 4
  9155. 4
  9156. 4
  9157. 4
  9158. 4
  9159. 4
  9160. 4
  9161. 4
  9162. 4
  9163. 4
  9164. 4
  9165. 4
  9166. 4
  9167. 4
  9168. 4
  9169. 4
  9170. 4
  9171. 4
  9172. 4
  9173. 4
  9174. 4
  9175. 4
  9176. 4
  9177. 4
  9178. 4
  9179. 4
  9180. 4
  9181. 4
  9182. 4
  9183. 4
  9184. 4
  9185. 4
  9186. 4
  9187. 4
  9188. 4
  9189. 4
  9190. 4
  9191. 4
  9192. 4
  9193. 4
  9194. 4
  9195. 4
  9196. 4
  9197. 4
  9198. 4
  9199. 4
  9200. 4
  9201. 4
  9202. 4
  9203. 4
  9204. 4
  9205. 4
  9206. 4
  9207. 4
  9208. 4
  9209. 4
  9210. 4
  9211. 4
  9212. 4
  9213. 4
  9214. 4
  9215. 4
  9216. 4
  9217. 4
  9218. 4
  9219. 4
  9220. 4
  9221. 4
  9222. 4
  9223. 4
  9224. 4
  9225. 4
  9226. 4
  9227. 4
  9228. 4
  9229. 4
  9230. 4
  9231. 4
  9232. 4
  9233. 4
  9234. 4
  9235. 4
  9236. 4
  9237. 4
  9238. 4
  9239. 4
  9240. 4
  9241. 4
  9242. 4
  9243. 4
  9244. 4
  9245. 4
  9246. 4
  9247. 4
  9248. 4
  9249. 4
  9250. 4
  9251. repost from ... @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    4
  9252. 4
  9253. 4
  9254. 4
  9255. 4
  9256. 4
  9257. 4
  9258. 4
  9259. 4
  9260. 4
  9261. 4
  9262. 4
  9263. 4
  9264. 4
  9265. 4
  9266. 4
  9267. 4
  9268. 4
  9269. 4
  9270. 4
  9271. 4
  9272. 4
  9273. 4
  9274. 4
  9275. 4
  9276. 4
  9277. 4
  9278. 4
  9279. 4
  9280. 4
  9281. 4
  9282. 4
  9283. 4
  9284. 4
  9285. 4
  9286. 4
  9287. 4
  9288. 4
  9289. 4
  9290. 4
  9291. 4
  9292. 4
  9293. 4
  9294. 4
  9295. 4
  9296. 4
  9297. 4
  9298. 4
  9299. 4
  9300. 4
  9301. 4
  9302. 4
  9303. 4
  9304. 4
  9305. 4
  9306. 4
  9307. 4
  9308. 4
  9309. 4
  9310. 4
  9311. 4
  9312. 4
  9313. 4
  9314. 4
  9315. 4
  9316. 4
  9317. 4
  9318. 4
  9319. 4
  9320. 4
  9321. 4
  9322. 4
  9323. 4
  9324. 4
  9325. 4
  9326. 4
  9327. 4
  9328. 4
  9329. 4
  9330. 4
  9331. 4
  9332. 4
  9333. 4
  9334. 4
  9335. 4
  9336. 4
  9337. 4
  9338. 4
  9339. 4
  9340. 4
  9341. 4
  9342. 4
  9343. 4
  9344. 4
  9345. 4
  9346. 4
  9347. 4
  9348. 4
  9349. 4
  9350. 4
  9351. 4
  9352. 4
  9353. 4
  9354. 4
  9355. 4
  9356. 4
  9357. 4
  9358. 4
  9359. 4
  9360. 4
  9361. 4
  9362. 4
  9363. 4
  9364. 4
  9365. 4
  9366. 4
  9367. 4
  9368. 4
  9369. 4
  9370. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    4
  9371. 4
  9372. 4
  9373. 4
  9374. 4
  9375. 4
  9376. 4
  9377. 4
  9378. 4
  9379. 4
  9380. 4
  9381. 4
  9382. 4
  9383. 4
  9384. 4
  9385. 4
  9386. 4
  9387. 4
  9388. 4
  9389. 4
  9390. 4
  9391. 4
  9392. 4
  9393. 4
  9394. 4
  9395. 4
  9396. 4
  9397. 4
  9398. 4
  9399. 4
  9400. 4
  9401. 4
  9402. 4
  9403. 4
  9404. 4
  9405. 4
  9406. 4
  9407. 4
  9408. 4
  9409. 4
  9410. 4
  9411. 4
  9412. 4
  9413. 4
  9414. 4
  9415. 4
  9416. 4
  9417. 4
  9418. 4
  9419. 4
  9420. 4
  9421. 4
  9422. 4
  9423. 4
  9424. 4
  9425. 4
  9426. 4
  9427. 4
  9428. 4
  9429. 4
  9430. 4
  9431. 4
  9432. 4
  9433. 4
  9434. 4
  9435. 4
  9436. 4
  9437. 4
  9438. 4
  9439. 4
  9440. 4
  9441. 4
  9442. 4
  9443. 4
  9444. 4
  9445. 4
  9446. 4
  9447. 4
  9448. 4
  9449. 4
  9450. 4
  9451. 4
  9452. 4
  9453. 4
  9454. 4
  9455. 4
  9456. 4
  9457. 4
  9458. 4
  9459. 4
  9460. 4
  9461. 4
  9462. 4
  9463. 4
  9464. 4
  9465. 4
  9466. 4
  9467. 4
  9468. 4
  9469. 4
  9470. 4
  9471. 4
  9472. 4
  9473. 4
  9474. 4
  9475. 4
  9476. 4
  9477. 4
  9478. 4
  9479. 4
  9480. 4
  9481. 4
  9482. 4
  9483. 4
  9484. 4
  9485. 4
  9486. 4
  9487. 4
  9488. 4
  9489. 4
  9490. 4
  9491. 4
  9492. 4
  9493. 4
  9494. 4
  9495. 4
  9496. 4
  9497. 4
  9498. 4
  9499. 4
  9500. 4
  9501. 4
  9502. 4
  9503. 4
  9504. 4
  9505. 4
  9506. 4
  9507. 4
  9508. 4
  9509. 4
  9510. 4
  9511. 4
  9512. 4
  9513. 4
  9514. 4
  9515. 4
  9516. 4
  9517. 4
  9518. 4
  9519. 4
  9520. 4
  9521. 4
  9522. 4
  9523. 4
  9524. 4
  9525. 4
  9526. 4
  9527. 4
  9528. 4
  9529. 4
  9530. 4
  9531. 4
  9532. 4
  9533. 4
  9534. 4
  9535. 4
  9536. 4
  9537. 4
  9538. 4
  9539. 4
  9540. 4
  9541. 4
  9542. 4
  9543. 4
  9544. 4
  9545. 4
  9546. 4
  9547. 4
  9548. 4
  9549. 4
  9550. 4
  9551. 4
  9552. 4
  9553. 4
  9554. 4
  9555. 4
  9556. 4
  9557. 4
  9558. 4
  9559. 4
  9560. 4
  9561. 4
  9562. 4
  9563. 4
  9564. 4
  9565. 4
  9566. 4
  9567. 4
  9568. 4
  9569. 4
  9570. 4
  9571. 4
  9572. 4
  9573. 4
  9574. 4
  9575. 3
  9576. 3
  9577. 3
  9578. 3
  9579. 3
  9580. 3
  9581. 3
  9582. 3
  9583. 3
  9584. 3
  9585. 3
  9586. 3
  9587. 3
  9588. 3
  9589. 3
  9590. 3
  9591. 3
  9592. 3
  9593. 3
  9594. 3
  9595. 3
  9596. 3
  9597. 3
  9598. 3
  9599. 3
  9600. 3
  9601. 3
  9602. 3
  9603. 3
  9604. 3
  9605. 3
  9606. 3
  9607. 3
  9608. 3
  9609. 3
  9610. 3
  9611. 3
  9612. 3
  9613. 3
  9614. 3
  9615. 3
  9616. 3
  9617. 3
  9618. 3
  9619. 3
  9620. 3
  9621. 3
  9622. 3
  9623. 3
  9624. 3
  9625. 3
  9626. 3
  9627. 3
  9628. 3
  9629. 3
  9630. 3
  9631. 3
  9632. 3
  9633. 3
  9634. 3
  9635. 3
  9636. 3
  9637. 3
  9638. 3
  9639. 3
  9640. 3
  9641. 3
  9642. 3
  9643. 3
  9644. 3
  9645. 3
  9646. 3
  9647. 3
  9648. 3
  9649. 3
  9650. 3
  9651. 3
  9652. 3
  9653. 3
  9654. 3
  9655. 3
  9656. 3
  9657. 3
  9658. 3
  9659. 3
  9660. 3
  9661. 3
  9662. 3
  9663. 3
  9664. 3
  9665. 3
  9666. 3
  9667. 3
  9668. 3
  9669. 3
  9670. 3
  9671. 3
  9672. 3
  9673. 3
  9674. 3
  9675. 3
  9676. 3
  9677. 3
  9678. 3
  9679. 3
  9680. 3
  9681. 3
  9682. 3
  9683. 3
  9684. 3
  9685. 3
  9686. 3
  9687. 3
  9688. 3
  9689. 3
  9690. 3
  9691. 3
  9692. 3
  9693. 3
  9694. 3
  9695. 3
  9696. 3
  9697. 3
  9698. 3
  9699. 3
  9700. 3
  9701. 3
  9702. 3
  9703. 3
  9704. 3
  9705. 3
  9706. 3
  9707. 3
  9708. 3
  9709. 3
  9710. 3
  9711. 3
  9712. 3
  9713. 3
  9714. 3
  9715. 3
  9716. 3
  9717. 3
  9718. 3
  9719. 3
  9720. 3
  9721. 3
  9722. 3
  9723. 3
  9724. 3
  9725. 3
  9726. 3
  9727. 3
  9728. 3
  9729. 3
  9730. 3
  9731. 3
  9732. 3
  9733. 3
  9734. 3
  9735. 3
  9736. 3
  9737. 3
  9738. 3
  9739. 3
  9740. 3
  9741. 3
  9742. 3
  9743. 3
  9744. 3
  9745. 3
  9746. 3
  9747. 3
  9748. 3
  9749. 3
  9750. 3
  9751. 3
  9752. 3
  9753. 3
  9754. 3
  9755. 3
  9756. 3
  9757. 3
  9758. 3
  9759. 3
  9760. 3
  9761. 3
  9762. 3
  9763. 3
  9764. 3
  9765. 3
  9766. 3
  9767. 3
  9768. 3
  9769. 3
  9770. 3
  9771. 3
  9772. 3
  9773. 3
  9774. 3
  9775. 3
  9776. 3
  9777. 3
  9778. 3
  9779. 3
  9780. 3
  9781. 3
  9782. 3
  9783. 3
  9784. 3
  9785. 3
  9786. 3
  9787. 3
  9788. 3
  9789. 3
  9790. 3
  9791. 3
  9792. 3
  9793. 3
  9794. 3
  9795. 3
  9796. 3
  9797. 3
  9798. 3
  9799. 3
  9800. 3
  9801. 3
  9802. 3
  9803. 3
  9804. 3
  9805. 3
  9806. 3
  9807. 3
  9808. 3
  9809. 3
  9810. 3
  9811. 3
  9812. 3
  9813. 3
  9814. 3
  9815. 3
  9816. 3
  9817. 3
  9818. 3
  9819. 3
  9820. 3
  9821. 3
  9822. 3
  9823. 3
  9824. 3
  9825. 3
  9826. 3
  9827. 3
  9828. 3
  9829. 3
  9830. 3
  9831. 3
  9832. 3
  9833. 3
  9834. 3
  9835. 3
  9836. 3
  9837. 3
  9838. 3
  9839. 3
  9840. 3
  9841. 3
  9842. 3
  9843. 3
  9844. 3
  9845. 3
  9846. 3
  9847. 3
  9848. 3
  9849. 3
  9850. 3
  9851. 3
  9852. 3
  9853. 3
  9854. 3
  9855. 3
  9856. 3
  9857. 3
  9858. 3
  9859. 3
  9860. 3
  9861. 3
  9862. 3
  9863. 3
  9864. 3
  9865. 3
  9866. 3
  9867. 3
  9868. 3
  9869. 3
  9870. 3
  9871. 3
  9872. 3
  9873. 3
  9874. 3
  9875. 3
  9876. 3
  9877. 3
  9878. 3
  9879. 3
  9880. 3
  9881. 3
  9882. 3
  9883. 3
  9884. 3
  9885. 3
  9886. 3
  9887. 3
  9888. 3
  9889. 3
  9890. 3
  9891. 3
  9892. 3
  9893. 3
  9894. 3
  9895. 3
  9896. 3
  9897. 3
  9898. 3
  9899. 3
  9900. 3
  9901. 3
  9902. 3
  9903. 3
  9904. 3
  9905. 3
  9906. 3
  9907. 3
  9908. 3
  9909. 3
  9910. 3
  9911. 3
  9912. 3
  9913. 3
  9914. 3
  9915. 3
  9916. 3
  9917. 3
  9918. 3
  9919. 3
  9920. 3
  9921. 3
  9922. 3
  9923. 3
  9924. 3
  9925. 3
  9926. 3
  9927. 3
  9928. 3
  9929. 3
  9930. 3
  9931. 3
  9932. 3
  9933. 3
  9934. 3
  9935. 3
  9936. 3
  9937. 3
  9938. 3
  9939. 3
  9940. 3
  9941. 3
  9942. 3
  9943. 3
  9944. 3
  9945. 3
  9946. 3
  9947. 3
  9948. 3
  9949. 3
  9950. 3
  9951. 3
  9952. 3
  9953. 3
  9954. 3
  9955. 3
  9956. 3
  9957. 3
  9958. 3
  9959. 3
  9960. 3
  9961. 3
  9962. 3
  9963. 3
  9964. 3
  9965. 3
  9966. 3
  9967. 3
  9968. 3
  9969. 3
  9970. 3
  9971. 3
  9972. 3
  9973. 3
  9974. 3
  9975. 3
  9976. 3
  9977. 3
  9978. 3
  9979. 3
  9980. 3
  9981. 3
  9982. 3
  9983. 3
  9984. 3
  9985. 3
  9986. 3
  9987. 3
  9988. 3
  9989. 3
  9990. 3
  9991. 3
  9992. 3
  9993. 3
  9994. 3
  9995. 3
  9996. 3
  9997. 3
  9998. 3
  9999. 3
  10000. 3
  10001. 3
  10002. 3
  10003. 3
  10004. 3
  10005. 3
  10006. 3
  10007. 3
  10008. 3
  10009. 3
  10010. 3
  10011. 3
  10012. 3
  10013. 3
  10014. 3
  10015. 3
  10016. 3
  10017. 3
  10018. 3
  10019. 3
  10020. 3
  10021. 3
  10022. 3
  10023. 3
  10024. 3
  10025. 3
  10026. 3
  10027. 3
  10028. 3
  10029. 3
  10030. 3
  10031. 3
  10032. 3
  10033. 3
  10034. 3
  10035. 3
  10036. 3
  10037. 3
  10038. 3
  10039. 3
  10040. 3
  10041. 3
  10042. 3
  10043. 3
  10044. 3
  10045. 3
  10046. 3
  10047. 3
  10048. 3
  10049. 3
  10050. 3
  10051. 3
  10052. 3
  10053. 3
  10054. 3
  10055. 3
  10056. 3
  10057. 3
  10058. 3
  10059. 3
  10060. Thousands people joined a demonstration in Okinawa's prefectural capital on Feb. 26 to protest the Japanese government's plans to build up its defense capabilities on a group of islands in the country's south for a possible contingency in Taiwan. The national government is moving forward with plans to bolster the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) and deploy missiles on the Nansei Islands including Okinawa amid concerns of contingencies. Participants in the demonstration in Naha voiced opposition, with one saying, "I want the government to hold thorough dialogue to ease tensions with the neighboring country." The group's 69-year-old executive committee chairperson Takamatsu Gushiken, who has worked for many years to recover the remains of those who perished in the Battle of Okinawa toward the end of the Pacific War, told the rally, "Militarization is being pushed forward at such a speed that it does not leave leeway for the people of Okinawa to think. We must not resort to shelters or evacuation, but choose to stop Okinawa from becoming a battlefield." Hiromori Shimoji, cohead of a resident group opposing the deployment of missiles on Miyako Island, which hosts a missile unit, commented, "The GSDF camp is in an area close to residential homes, and the ammunition depot is also near the community. If something happens, residents would not be able to survive it." After the gathering, participants marched through the streets of Naha while holding signs reading, "Don't make the islands into battlefields!" and "No more military bases."
    3
  10061. 3
  10062. 3
  10063. 3
  10064. 3
  10065. 3
  10066. 3
  10067. 3
  10068. 3
  10069. 3
  10070. 3
  10071. 3
  10072. 3
  10073. 3
  10074. 3
  10075. 3
  10076. 3
  10077. 3
  10078. 3
  10079. 3
  10080. 3
  10081. 3
  10082. 3
  10083. 3
  10084. 3
  10085. 3
  10086. 3
  10087. 3
  10088. 3
  10089. 3
  10090. 3
  10091. 3
  10092. 3
  10093. 3
  10094. 3
  10095. 3
  10096. 3
  10097. 3
  10098. 3
  10099. 3
  10100. 3
  10101. 3
  10102. 3
  10103. 3
  10104. 3
  10105. 3
  10106. 3
  10107. 3
  10108. 3
  10109. 3
  10110. 3
  10111. 3
  10112. 3
  10113. 3
  10114. 3
  10115. 3
  10116. 3
  10117. 3
  10118. 3
  10119. 3
  10120. 3
  10121. 3
  10122. 3
  10123. 3
  10124. 3
  10125. 3
  10126. 3
  10127. 3
  10128. 3
  10129. 3
  10130. 3
  10131. 3
  10132. 3
  10133. 3
  10134. 3
  10135. 3
  10136. 3
  10137. 3
  10138. 3
  10139. 3
  10140. 3
  10141. 3
  10142. 3
  10143. 3
  10144. 3
  10145. 3
  10146. 3
  10147. 3
  10148. 3
  10149. 3
  10150. 3
  10151. 3
  10152. 3
  10153. 3
  10154. 3
  10155. 3
  10156. 3
  10157. 3
  10158. 3
  10159. 3
  10160. 3
  10161. 3
  10162. 3
  10163. 3
  10164. 3
  10165. 3
  10166. 3
  10167. 3
  10168. 3
  10169. 3
  10170. 3
  10171. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    3
  10172. 3
  10173. 3
  10174. 3
  10175. 3
  10176. 3
  10177. 3
  10178. 3
  10179. 3
  10180. 3
  10181. 3
  10182. 3
  10183. 3
  10184. 3
  10185. 3
  10186. 3
  10187. 3
  10188. 3
  10189. 3
  10190. 3
  10191. 3
  10192. 3
  10193. 3
  10194. 3
  10195. 3
  10196. 3
  10197. 3
  10198. 3
  10199. 3
  10200. 3
  10201. 3
  10202. 3
  10203. 3
  10204. 3
  10205. 3
  10206. 3
  10207. 3
  10208. 3
  10209. 3
  10210. 3
  10211. 3
  10212. 3
  10213. 3
  10214. 3
  10215. 3
  10216. 3
  10217. 3
  10218. 3
  10219. 3
  10220. 3
  10221. 3
  10222. 3
  10223. 3
  10224. 3
  10225. 3
  10226. 3
  10227. 3
  10228. 3
  10229. 3
  10230. 3
  10231. 3
  10232. 3
  10233. 3
  10234. 3
  10235. 3
  10236. 3
  10237. 3
  10238. 3
  10239. 3
  10240. 3
  10241. 3
  10242. 3
  10243. 3
  10244. 3
  10245. 3
  10246. 3
  10247. 3
  10248. 3
  10249. 3
  10250. 3
  10251. 3
  10252. 3
  10253. 3
  10254. 3
  10255. 3
  10256. 3
  10257. South Africans Demands UK to return diamonds in King Charles crown jewels Some South Africans are calling on the United Kingdom to return the world's largest diamond, known as the Star of Africa, to its rightful place in South Africa. The diamond is currently set in the royal sceptre that King Charles III coronation will hold on Saturday, May 6th, 2023. According to the Royal Collection Trust, which oversees the royal collection of the British royal family, the Cullinan diamond was presented to King Edward VII (the British monarch at the time) in 1907, two years after its discovery in a private mine in South Africa's old Transvaal province. Now amid a global conversation about returning artwork and artefacts that were stolen during colonial times, some South Africans are calling for the diamond to be brought back. “The diamond needs to come to South Africa. It needs to be a sign of our pride, our heritage and our culture,” said Mothusi Kamanga, a lawyer and activist in Johannesburg who has promoted an online petition, which has gathered about 8,000 signatures, for the diamond to be returned. “I think generally the African people are starting to realize that to decolonise is not just to let people have certain freedoms, but it’s also to take back what has been expropriated from us.” The diamond in the sceptre, officially known as Cullinan I, was cut from the Cullinan diamond, a 3,100-carat stone mined near Pretoria. Cullinan II, a lesser diamond cut from the same stone, sits in the Imperial State Crown, which British monarchs wear on formal occasions. It is stored at the Tower of London with the other crown jewels, together with the sceptre. Ironically, only a replica of the whole Cullinan diamond, which is about the size of a man’s fist, is displayed at the Cape Town Diamond Museum.
    3
  10258. 3
  10259. 3
  10260. 3
  10261. 3
  10262. 3
  10263. 3
  10264. 3
  10265. 3
  10266. 3
  10267. 3
  10268. 3
  10269. 3
  10270. 3
  10271. 3
  10272. 3
  10273. 3
  10274. 3
  10275. 3
  10276. 3
  10277. 3
  10278. 3
  10279. 3
  10280. 3
  10281. 3
  10282. 3
  10283. 3
  10284. 3
  10285. 3
  10286. 3
  10287. 3
  10288. 3
  10289. 3
  10290. 3
  10291. 3
  10292. 3
  10293. 3
  10294. 3
  10295. 3
  10296. 3
  10297. 3
  10298. 3
  10299. 3
  10300. 3
  10301. 3
  10302. 3
  10303. 3
  10304. 3
  10305. 3
  10306. 3
  10307. 3
  10308. 3
  10309. 3
  10310. 3
  10311. 3
  10312. 3
  10313. 3
  10314. 3
  10315. 3
  10316. 3
  10317. 3
  10318. 3
  10319. 3
  10320. 3
  10321. 3
  10322. 3
  10323. 3
  10324. 3
  10325. 3
  10326. 3
  10327. 3
  10328. 3
  10329. 3
  10330. 3
  10331. 3
  10332. 3
  10333. 3
  10334. 3
  10335. 3
  10336. 3
  10337. 3
  10338. 3
  10339. 3
  10340. 3
  10341. 3
  10342. 3
  10343. 3
  10344. 3
  10345. 3
  10346. 3
  10347. 3
  10348. 3
  10349. 3
  10350. 3
  10351. 3
  10352. 3
  10353. 3
  10354. 3
  10355. 3
  10356. 3
  10357. 3
  10358. 3
  10359. 3
  10360. 3
  10361. 3
  10362. 3
  10363. 3
  10364. 3
  10365. 3
  10366. 3
  10367. 3
  10368. 3
  10369. 3
  10370. 3
  10371. 3
  10372. 3
  10373. 3
  10374. 3
  10375. 3
  10376. 3
  10377. 3
  10378. 3
  10379. 3
  10380. 3
  10381. 3
  10382. 3
  10383. 3
  10384. 3
  10385. 3
  10386. 3
  10387. 3
  10388. 3
  10389. 3
  10390. 3
  10391. 3
  10392. 3
  10393. 3
  10394. 3
  10395. 3
  10396. 3
  10397. 3
  10398. 3
  10399. 3
  10400. 3
  10401. 3
  10402. 3
  10403. 3
  10404. 3
  10405. 3
  10406. 3
  10407. 3
  10408. 3
  10409. 3
  10410. 3
  10411. 3
  10412. 3
  10413. 3
  10414. 3
  10415. 3
  10416. 3
  10417. 3
  10418. 3
  10419. 3
  10420. 3
  10421. 3
  10422. 3
  10423. 3
  10424. 3
  10425. 3
  10426. 3
  10427. 3
  10428. 3
  10429. 3
  10430. 3
  10431. 3
  10432. 3
  10433. 3
  10434. 3
  10435. 3
  10436. 3
  10437. 3
  10438. 3
  10439. 3
  10440. 3
  10441. 3
  10442. 3
  10443. 3
  10444. 3
  10445. 3
  10446. 3
  10447. 3
  10448. 3
  10449. 3
  10450. 3
  10451. 3
  10452. 3
  10453. 3
  10454. 3
  10455. 3
  10456. 3
  10457. 3
  10458. 3
  10459. 3
  10460. 3
  10461. 3
  10462. 3
  10463. 3
  10464. 3
  10465. 3
  10466. 3
  10467. 3
  10468. 3
  10469. 3
  10470. 3
  10471. 3
  10472. 3
  10473. 3
  10474. 3
  10475. 3
  10476. 3
  10477. 3
  10478. 3
  10479. 3
  10480. 3
  10481. 3
  10482. 3
  10483. 3
  10484. 3
  10485. 3
  10486. 3
  10487. 3
  10488. 3
  10489. 3
  10490. 3
  10491. 3
  10492. 3
  10493. 3
  10494. 3
  10495. 3
  10496. 3
  10497. 3
  10498. 3
  10499. 3
  10500. 3
  10501. 3
  10502. 3
  10503. 3
  10504. 3
  10505. 3
  10506. 3
  10507. 3
  10508. 3
  10509. 3
  10510. 3
  10511. 3
  10512. 3
  10513. 3
  10514. 3
  10515. 3
  10516. 3
  10517. 3
  10518. 3
  10519. 3
  10520. 3
  10521. 3
  10522. 3
  10523. 3
  10524. 3
  10525. 3
  10526. 3
  10527. 3
  10528. 3
  10529. 3
  10530. 3
  10531. 3
  10532. 3
  10533. 3
  10534. 3
  10535. 3
  10536. 3
  10537. 3
  10538. 3
  10539. 3
  10540. 3
  10541. 3
  10542. 3
  10543. 3
  10544. 3
  10545. 3
  10546. 3
  10547. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    3
  10548. 3
  10549. 3
  10550. 3
  10551. 3
  10552. 3
  10553. 3
  10554. 3
  10555. 3
  10556. 3
  10557. 3
  10558. 3
  10559. 3
  10560. 3
  10561. 3
  10562. 3
  10563. 3
  10564. 3
  10565. 3
  10566. 3
  10567. 3
  10568. 3
  10569. 3
  10570. 3
  10571. 3
  10572. 3
  10573. 3
  10574. 3
  10575. 3
  10576. 3
  10577. 3
  10578. 3
  10579. 3
  10580. 3
  10581. 3
  10582. 3
  10583. 3
  10584. 3
  10585. 3
  10586. 3
  10587. 3
  10588. 3
  10589. 3
  10590. 3
  10591. 3
  10592. 3
  10593. 3
  10594. 3
  10595. 3
  10596. 3
  10597. 3
  10598. 3
  10599. 3
  10600. 3
  10601. 3
  10602. 3
  10603. 3
  10604. 3
  10605. 3
  10606. 3
  10607. 3
  10608. 3
  10609. 3
  10610. 3
  10611. 3
  10612. 3
  10613. 3
  10614. 3
  10615. 3
  10616. 3
  10617. 3
  10618. 3
  10619. 3
  10620. 3
  10621. 3
  10622. 3
  10623. 3
  10624. 3
  10625. 3
  10626. 3
  10627. 3
  10628. 3
  10629. 3
  10630. 3
  10631. 3
  10632. 3
  10633. 3
  10634. 3
  10635. 3
  10636. 3
  10637. 3
  10638. 3
  10639. 3
  10640. 3
  10641. 3
  10642. 3
  10643. 3
  10644. 3
  10645. 3
  10646. 3
  10647. 3
  10648. 3
  10649. 3
  10650. 3
  10651. 3
  10652. 3
  10653. 3
  10654. 3
  10655. 3
  10656. 3
  10657. 3
  10658. 3
  10659. 3
  10660. 3
  10661. 3
  10662. 3
  10663. 3
  10664. 3
  10665. 3
  10666. 3
  10667. 3
  10668. 3
  10669. 3
  10670. 3
  10671. 3
  10672. 3
  10673. 3
  10674. 3
  10675. 3
  10676. 3
  10677. 3
  10678. 3
  10679. 3
  10680. 3
  10681. 3
  10682. 3
  10683. 3
  10684. 3
  10685. 3
  10686. 3
  10687. 3
  10688. 3
  10689. 3
  10690. 3
  10691. 3
  10692. 3
  10693. 3
  10694. 3
  10695. 3
  10696. 3
  10697. 3
  10698. 3
  10699. 3
  10700. 3
  10701. 3
  10702. 3
  10703. 3
  10704. 3
  10705. 3
  10706. 3
  10707. 3
  10708. 3
  10709. 3
  10710. 3
  10711. 3
  10712. 3
  10713. 3
  10714. 3
  10715. 3
  10716. 3
  10717. 3
  10718. 3
  10719. 3
  10720. 3
  10721. 3
  10722. 3
  10723. 3
  10724. 3
  10725. 3
  10726. 3
  10727. 3
  10728. 3
  10729. 3
  10730. 3
  10731. 3
  10732. 3
  10733. 3
  10734. 3
  10735. 3
  10736. 3
  10737. 3
  10738. 3
  10739. 3
  10740. 3
  10741. 3
  10742. 3
  10743. 3
  10744. 3
  10745. 3
  10746. 3
  10747. 3
  10748. 3
  10749. 3
  10750. 3
  10751. 3
  10752. 3
  10753. 3
  10754. 3
  10755. 3
  10756. 3
  10757. 3
  10758. 3
  10759. 3
  10760. 3
  10761. 3
  10762. 3
  10763. 3
  10764. 3
  10765. 3
  10766. 3
  10767. 3
  10768. 3
  10769. 3
  10770. 3
  10771. 3
  10772. 3
  10773. 3
  10774. 3
  10775. 3
  10776. 3
  10777. 3
  10778. 3
  10779. 3
  10780. 3
  10781. 3
  10782. 3
  10783. 3
  10784. 3
  10785. 3
  10786. 3
  10787. 3
  10788. 3
  10789. 3
  10790. 3
  10791. 3
  10792. 3
  10793. 3
  10794. 3
  10795. 3
  10796. 3
  10797. 3
  10798. 3
  10799. 3
  10800. 3
  10801. 3
  10802. 3
  10803. 3
  10804. 3
  10805. 3
  10806. 3
  10807. 3
  10808. 3
  10809. 3
  10810. 3
  10811. 3
  10812. 3
  10813. 3
  10814. 3
  10815. 3
  10816. 3
  10817. 3
  10818. 3
  10819. 3
  10820. 3
  10821. 3
  10822. 3
  10823. 3
  10824. 3
  10825. 3
  10826. 3
  10827. 3
  10828. 3
  10829. 3
  10830. 3
  10831. 3
  10832. 3
  10833. 3
  10834. 3
  10835. 3
  10836. 3
  10837. 3
  10838. 3
  10839. 3
  10840. 3
  10841. 3
  10842. 3
  10843. 3
  10844. 3
  10845. 3
  10846. 3
  10847. 3
  10848. 3
  10849. 3
  10850. 3
  10851. 3
  10852. 3
  10853. 3
  10854. 3
  10855. 3
  10856. 3
  10857. 3
  10858. 3
  10859. 3
  10860. 3
  10861. 3
  10862. 3
  10863. 3
  10864. 3
  10865. 3
  10866. 3
  10867. 3
  10868. 3
  10869. 3
  10870. 3
  10871. 3
  10872. 3
  10873. 3
  10874. 3
  10875. 3
  10876. 3
  10877. 3
  10878. 3
  10879. 3
  10880. 3
  10881. 3
  10882. 3
  10883. 3
  10884. 3
  10885. 3
  10886. 3
  10887. 3
  10888. 3
  10889. 3
  10890. 3
  10891. 3
  10892. 3
  10893. 3
  10894. 3
  10895. 3
  10896. 3
  10897. 3
  10898. 3
  10899. 3
  10900. 3
  10901. 3
  10902. 3
  10903. 3
  10904. 3
  10905. 3
  10906. 3
  10907. 3
  10908. 3
  10909. 3
  10910. 3
  10911. 3
  10912. 3
  10913. 3
  10914. 3
  10915. 3
  10916. 3
  10917. 3
  10918. 3
  10919. 3
  10920. 3
  10921. 3
  10922. 3
  10923. 3
  10924. 3
  10925. 3
  10926. 3
  10927. 3
  10928. 3
  10929. 3
  10930. 3
  10931. 3
  10932. 3
  10933. 3
  10934. 3
  10935. 3
  10936. 3
  10937. 3
  10938. 3
  10939. 3
  10940. 3
  10941. 3
  10942. 3
  10943. 3
  10944. 3
  10945. 3
  10946. 3
  10947. 3
  10948. 3
  10949. 3
  10950. 3
  10951. 3
  10952. 3
  10953. 3
  10954. 3
  10955. 3
  10956. 3
  10957. 3
  10958. 3
  10959. 3
  10960. 3
  10961. 3
  10962. 3
  10963. 3
  10964. 3
  10965. 3
  10966. 3
  10967. 3
  10968. 3
  10969. 3
  10970. 3
  10971. 3
  10972. 3
  10973. 3
  10974. 3
  10975. 3
  10976. 3
  10977. 3
  10978. 3
  10979. 3
  10980. 3
  10981. 3
  10982. 3
  10983. 3
  10984. 3
  10985. 3
  10986. 3
  10987. 3
  10988. 3
  10989. 3
  10990. 3
  10991. 3
  10992. 3
  10993. 3
  10994. 3
  10995. 3
  10996. 3
  10997. 3
  10998. 3
  10999. 3
  11000. 3
  11001. 3
  11002. 3
  11003. 3
  11004. 3
  11005. 3
  11006. 3
  11007. 3
  11008. 3
  11009. 3
  11010. 3
  11011. 3
  11012. 3
  11013. 3
  11014. 3
  11015. 3
  11016. 3
  11017. 3
  11018. 3
  11019. 3
  11020. 3
  11021. 3
  11022. 3
  11023. 3
  11024. 3
  11025. 3
  11026. 3
  11027. 3
  11028. 3
  11029. 3
  11030. 3
  11031. 3
  11032. 3
  11033. 3
  11034. 3
  11035. 3
  11036. 3
  11037. 3
  11038. 3
  11039. 3
  11040. 3
  11041. 3
  11042. 3
  11043. 3
  11044. 3
  11045. 3
  11046. 3
  11047. 3
  11048. 3
  11049. 3
  11050. 3
  11051. 3
  11052. 3
  11053. 3
  11054. 3
  11055. 3
  11056. 3
  11057. 3
  11058. 3
  11059. 3
  11060. 3
  11061. 3
  11062. 3
  11063. 3
  11064. 3
  11065. 3
  11066. 3
  11067. 3
  11068. 3
  11069. 3
  11070. 3
  11071. 3
  11072. 3
  11073. 3
  11074. 3
  11075. 3
  11076. 3
  11077. 3
  11078. 3
  11079. 3
  11080. 3
  11081. 3
  11082. 3
  11083. 3
  11084. 3
  11085. 3
  11086. 3
  11087. 3
  11088. 3
  11089. 3
  11090. 3
  11091. 3
  11092. 3
  11093. 3
  11094. 3
  11095. 3
  11096. 3
  11097. 3
  11098. 3
  11099. 3
  11100. 3
  11101. 3
  11102. 3
  11103. 3
  11104. 3
  11105. 3
  11106. 3
  11107. 3
  11108. 3
  11109. 3
  11110. 3
  11111. 3
  11112. 3
  11113. 3
  11114. 3
  11115. 3
  11116. 3
  11117. 3
  11118. 3
  11119. 3
  11120. 3
  11121. 3
  11122. 3
  11123. 3
  11124. 3
  11125. 3
  11126. 3
  11127. 3
  11128. 3
  11129. 3
  11130. 3
  11131. 3
  11132. 3
  11133. 3
  11134. 3
  11135. 3
  11136. 3
  11137. 3
  11138. 3
  11139. 3
  11140. 3
  11141. 3
  11142. 3
  11143. 3
  11144. 3
  11145. 3
  11146. 3
  11147. 3
  11148. 3
  11149. 3
  11150. 3
  11151. 3
  11152. 3
  11153. 3
  11154. 3
  11155. 3
  11156. 3
  11157. 3
  11158. 3
  11159. 3
  11160. 3
  11161. 3
  11162. 3
  11163. 3
  11164. 3
  11165. 3
  11166. 3
  11167. 3
  11168. 3
  11169. 3
  11170. 3
  11171. 3
  11172. 3
  11173. 3
  11174. 3
  11175. 3
  11176. 3
  11177. 3
  11178. 3
  11179. 3
  11180. 3
  11181. 3
  11182. 3
  11183. 3
  11184. 3
  11185. 3
  11186. 3
  11187. 3
  11188. 3
  11189. 3
  11190. 3
  11191. 3
  11192. 3
  11193. 3
  11194. 3
  11195. 3
  11196. 3
  11197. 3
  11198. 3
  11199. 3
  11200. 3
  11201. 3
  11202. 3
  11203. 3
  11204. 3
  11205. 3
  11206. 3
  11207. 3
  11208. 3
  11209. 3
  11210. 3
  11211. 3
  11212. 3
  11213. 3
  11214. 3
  11215. 3
  11216. 3
  11217. 3
  11218. 3
  11219. 3
  11220. 3
  11221. 3
  11222. 3
  11223. 3
  11224. 3
  11225. 3
  11226. 3
  11227. 3
  11228. 3
  11229. 3
  11230. 3
  11231. 3
  11232. 3
  11233. 3
  11234. 3
  11235. 3
  11236. 3
  11237. 3
  11238. 3
  11239. 3
  11240. 3
  11241. 3
  11242. 3
  11243. 3
  11244. 3
  11245. 3
  11246. 3
  11247. 3
  11248. 3
  11249. 3
  11250. 3
  11251. 3
  11252. 3
  11253. 3
  11254. 3
  11255. 3
  11256. 3
  11257. 3
  11258. 3
  11259. 3
  11260. 3
  11261. Why don't tell the truth ? How did the U$A prxnting money cause inflation in other countries? When the U.$A prxnts money, it increases the money supply, which can lead to inflation if not managed properly. The U.S. dollar is the world's primary reserve currency, which means that it is held by many countries as a significant part of their foreign exchange reserves. As a result, any substantial change in the U.S. monetary policy can have a ripple effect on other economies around the globe. Here are a few ways in which U$A money prxnting can cause inflation in other countries: Currency exchange rates: When the U.S. increases its money supply, the value of the U.S. dollar tends to depreciate against other currencies. This can make imported goods more expensive for American consumers, leading to increased demand for domestic goods. On the flip side, it can also make exports from the U.S. cheaper for foreign consumers, driving up demand for U.S. goods. This increased demand can cause inflationary pressure in the exporting countries as their own currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar. Commodity prices: Many global commodities, such as oil, gold, and other raw materials, are priced in U.S. dollars. When the value of the U.S. dollar declines due to money printing, it often leads to higher commodity prices in dollar terms. This can cause inflation in other countries that rely on these commodities, either as importers or producers. Capital flows: Money printing in the U.S. can lead to lower interest rates, prompting investors to seek higher returns elsewhere. This can cause an influx of capital into other countries, leading to increased investment and demand for goods and services. As demand outpaces supply, inflation may result. Imported inflation: When the U.S. experiences inflation due to money printing, other countries that import goods and services from the U.S. can also experience inflation as the cost of those imports rises. This is particularly relevant for countries with a significant trade relationship with the U.S.
    3
  11262. 3
  11263. 3
  11264. 3
  11265. 3
  11266. 3
  11267. 3
  11268. 3
  11269. 3
  11270. 3
  11271. 3
  11272. 3
  11273. 3
  11274. 3
  11275. 3
  11276. 3
  11277. 3
  11278. 3
  11279. 3
  11280. 3
  11281. 3
  11282. 3
  11283. 3
  11284. 3
  11285. 3
  11286. 3
  11287. 3
  11288. 3
  11289. 3
  11290. 3
  11291. 3
  11292. 3
  11293. 3
  11294. 3
  11295. 3
  11296. 3
  11297. 3
  11298. 3
  11299. 3
  11300. 3
  11301. 3
  11302. 3
  11303. 3
  11304. 3
  11305. 3
  11306. 3
  11307. 3
  11308. 3
  11309. 3
  11310. 3
  11311. 3
  11312. 3
  11313. 3
  11314. 3
  11315. 3
  11316. 3
  11317. 3
  11318. 3
  11319. 3
  11320. 3
  11321. 3
  11322. 3
  11323. 3
  11324. 3
  11325. 3
  11326. 3
  11327. 3
  11328. 3
  11329. 3
  11330. 3
  11331. 3
  11332. 3
  11333. 3
  11334. 3
  11335. 3
  11336. 3
  11337. 3
  11338. 3
  11339. 3
  11340. 3
  11341. 3
  11342. 3
  11343. 3
  11344. 3
  11345. 3
  11346. 3
  11347. 3
  11348. 3
  11349. 3
  11350. 3
  11351. 3
  11352. 3
  11353. 3
  11354. 3
  11355. 3
  11356. 3
  11357. 3
  11358. 3
  11359. 3
  11360. 3
  11361. 3
  11362. 3
  11363. 3
  11364. 3
  11365. 3
  11366. 3
  11367. 3
  11368. 3
  11369. 3
  11370. 3
  11371. 3
  11372. 3
  11373. 3
  11374. 3
  11375. 3
  11376. 3
  11377. 3
  11378. 3
  11379. 3
  11380. 3
  11381. 3
  11382. 3
  11383. 3
  11384. 3
  11385. 3
  11386. 3
  11387. 3
  11388. 3
  11389. 3
  11390. 3
  11391. 3
  11392. 3
  11393. 3
  11394. 3
  11395. 3
  11396. 3
  11397. 3
  11398. 3
  11399. 3
  11400. 3
  11401. 3
  11402. 3
  11403. 3
  11404. 3
  11405. 3
  11406. 3
  11407. 3
  11408. 3
  11409. 3
  11410. 3
  11411. 3
  11412. 3
  11413. 3
  11414. 3
  11415. 3
  11416. 3
  11417. 3
  11418. 3
  11419. 3
  11420. 3
  11421. 3
  11422. 3
  11423. 3
  11424. 3
  11425. 3
  11426. 3
  11427. 3
  11428. 3
  11429. 3
  11430. 3
  11431. 3
  11432. 3
  11433. 3
  11434. 3
  11435. 3
  11436. 3
  11437. 3
  11438. 3
  11439. 3
  11440. 3
  11441. 3
  11442. 3
  11443. 3
  11444. 3
  11445. 3
  11446. 3
  11447. 3
  11448. 3
  11449. 3
  11450. 3
  11451. 3
  11452. 3
  11453. 3
  11454. 3
  11455. 3
  11456. 3
  11457. 3
  11458. 3
  11459. 3
  11460. 3
  11461. 3
  11462. 3
  11463. 3
  11464. 3
  11465. 3
  11466. 3
  11467. 3
  11468. 3
  11469. 3
  11470. 3
  11471. 3
  11472. 3
  11473. 3
  11474. 3
  11475. 3
  11476. 3
  11477. 3
  11478. 3
  11479. 3
  11480. 3
  11481. 3
  11482. 3
  11483. 3
  11484. 3
  11485. 3
  11486. 3
  11487. 3
  11488. 3
  11489. 3
  11490. 3
  11491. 3
  11492. 3
  11493. 3
  11494. 3
  11495. 3
  11496. 3
  11497. 3
  11498. 3
  11499. 3
  11500. 3
  11501. 3
  11502. 3
  11503. 3
  11504. 3
  11505. 3
  11506. 3
  11507. 3
  11508. 3
  11509. 3
  11510. 3
  11511. 3
  11512. 3
  11513. 3
  11514. 3
  11515. 3
  11516. 3
  11517. 3
  11518. 3
  11519. 3
  11520. 3
  11521. 3
  11522. 3
  11523. 3
  11524. 3
  11525. 3
  11526. 3
  11527. 3
  11528. 3
  11529. 3
  11530. 3
  11531. 3
  11532. 3
  11533. 3
  11534. 3
  11535. 3
  11536. 3
  11537. 3
  11538. 3
  11539. 3
  11540. 3
  11541. 3
  11542. 3
  11543. 3
  11544. 3
  11545. 3
  11546. 3
  11547. 3
  11548. 3
  11549. 3
  11550. 3
  11551. 3
  11552. 3
  11553. 3
  11554. 3
  11555. 3
  11556. 3
  11557. 3
  11558. 3
  11559. 3
  11560. 3
  11561. 3
  11562. 3
  11563. 3
  11564. 3
  11565. 3
  11566. 3
  11567. 3
  11568. 3
  11569. 3
  11570. 3
  11571. 3
  11572. 3
  11573. 3
  11574. 3
  11575. 3
  11576. 3
  11577. 3
  11578. 3
  11579. 3
  11580. 3
  11581. 3
  11582. 3
  11583. 3
  11584. 3
  11585. 3
  11586. 3
  11587. 3
  11588. 3
  11589. 3
  11590. 3
  11591. 3
  11592. 3
  11593. 3
  11594. 3
  11595. 3
  11596. 3
  11597. 3
  11598. 3
  11599. 3
  11600. 3
  11601. 3
  11602. 3
  11603. 3
  11604. 3
  11605. 3
  11606. 3
  11607. 3
  11608. 3
  11609. 3
  11610. 3
  11611. 3
  11612. 3
  11613. 3
  11614. 3
  11615. 3
  11616. 3
  11617. 3
  11618. 3
  11619. 3
  11620. 3
  11621. 3
  11622. 3
  11623. 3
  11624. 3
  11625. 3
  11626. 3
  11627. 3
  11628. 3
  11629. 3
  11630. 3
  11631. 3
  11632. 3
  11633. 3
  11634. 3
  11635. 3
  11636. 3
  11637. 3
  11638. 3
  11639. 3
  11640. 3
  11641. 3
  11642. 3
  11643. 3
  11644. 3
  11645. 3
  11646. 3
  11647. 3
  11648. 3
  11649. 3
  11650. 3
  11651. 3
  11652. 3
  11653. 3
  11654. 3
  11655. 3
  11656. 3
  11657. 3
  11658. 3
  11659. 3
  11660. 3
  11661. 3
  11662. 3
  11663. 3
  11664. 3
  11665. 3
  11666. 3
  11667. 3
  11668. 3
  11669. 3
  11670. 3
  11671. 3
  11672. 3
  11673. 3
  11674. 3
  11675. 3
  11676. 3
  11677. 3
  11678. 3
  11679. 3
  11680. 3
  11681. 3
  11682. 3
  11683. 3
  11684. 3
  11685. 3
  11686. 3
  11687. 3
  11688. 3
  11689. 3
  11690. 3
  11691. 3
  11692. 3
  11693. 3
  11694. 3
  11695. 3
  11696. 3
  11697. 3
  11698. 3
  11699. 3
  11700. 3
  11701. 3
  11702. 3
  11703. 3
  11704. 3
  11705. 3
  11706. 3
  11707. 3
  11708. 3
  11709. 3
  11710. 3
  11711. 3
  11712. 3
  11713. 3
  11714. 3
  11715. 3
  11716. 3
  11717. 3
  11718. 3
  11719. 3
  11720. 3
  11721. 3
  11722. 3
  11723. 3
  11724. 3
  11725. 3
  11726. 3
  11727. 3
  11728. 3
  11729. 3
  11730. 3
  11731. 3
  11732. 3
  11733. 3
  11734. 3
  11735. 3
  11736. 3
  11737. 3
  11738. 3
  11739. 3
  11740. 3
  11741. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    3
  11742. 3
  11743. 3
  11744. 3
  11745. 3
  11746. 3
  11747. 3
  11748. 3
  11749. 3
  11750. 3
  11751. 3
  11752. 3
  11753. 3
  11754. 3
  11755. 3
  11756. 3
  11757. 3
  11758. 3
  11759. 3
  11760. 3
  11761. 3
  11762. 3
  11763. 3
  11764. 3
  11765. 3
  11766. 3
  11767. 3
  11768. 3
  11769. 3
  11770. 3
  11771. 3
  11772. 3
  11773. 3
  11774. 3
  11775. 3
  11776. 3
  11777. 3
  11778. 3
  11779. 3
  11780. 3
  11781. 3
  11782. 3
  11783. 3
  11784. 3
  11785. 3
  11786. 3
  11787. 3
  11788. 3
  11789. 3
  11790. 3
  11791. 3
  11792. 3
  11793. 3
  11794. 3
  11795. 3
  11796. 3
  11797. 3
  11798. 3
  11799. 3
  11800. 3
  11801. 3
  11802. 3
  11803. 3
  11804. 3
  11805. 3
  11806. 3
  11807. 3
  11808. 3
  11809. 3
  11810. 3
  11811. 3
  11812. 3
  11813. 3
  11814. 3
  11815. 3
  11816. 3
  11817. 3
  11818. 3
  11819. 3
  11820. 3
  11821. 3
  11822. 3
  11823. 3
  11824. 3
  11825. 3
  11826. 3
  11827. 3
  11828. 3
  11829. 3
  11830. 3
  11831. 3
  11832. 3
  11833. 3
  11834. 3
  11835. 3
  11836. 3
  11837. 3
  11838. 3
  11839. 3
  11840. 3
  11841. 3
  11842. 3
  11843. 3
  11844. 3
  11845. 3
  11846. 3
  11847. 3
  11848. 3
  11849. 3
  11850. 3
  11851. 3
  11852. 3
  11853. 3
  11854. 3
  11855. 3
  11856. 3
  11857. 3
  11858. 3
  11859. 3
  11860. 3
  11861. 3
  11862. 3
  11863. 3
  11864. 3
  11865. 3
  11866. 3
  11867. 3
  11868. 3
  11869. 3
  11870. 3
  11871. 3
  11872. 3
  11873. 3
  11874. 3
  11875. 3
  11876. 3
  11877. 3
  11878. 3
  11879. 3
  11880. 3
  11881. 3
  11882. 3
  11883. 3
  11884. 3
  11885. 3
  11886. 3
  11887. 3
  11888. 3
  11889. 3
  11890. 3
  11891. 3
  11892. 3
  11893. 3
  11894. 3
  11895. 3
  11896. 3
  11897. 3
  11898. 3
  11899. 3
  11900. 3
  11901. 3
  11902. 3
  11903. 3
  11904. 3
  11905. 3
  11906. 3
  11907. 3
  11908. 3
  11909. 3
  11910. 3
  11911. 3
  11912. 3
  11913. 3
  11914. 3
  11915. 3
  11916. 3
  11917. 3
  11918. 3
  11919. 3
  11920. 3
  11921. 3
  11922. 3
  11923. 3
  11924. 3
  11925. 3
  11926. 3
  11927. 3
  11928. 3
  11929. 3
  11930. 3
  11931. 3
  11932. 3
  11933. 3
  11934. 3
  11935. 3
  11936. 3
  11937. 3
  11938. 3
  11939. 3
  11940. 3
  11941. 3
  11942. 3
  11943. 3
  11944. 3
  11945. 3
  11946. 3
  11947. 3
  11948. 3
  11949. 3
  11950. 3
  11951. 3
  11952. 3
  11953. 3
  11954. 3
  11955. 3
  11956. 3
  11957. 3
  11958. 3
  11959. 3
  11960. 3
  11961. 3
  11962. 3
  11963. 3
  11964. 3
  11965. 3
  11966. 3
  11967. 3
  11968. 3
  11969. 3
  11970. 3
  11971. 3
  11972. 3
  11973. 3
  11974. 3
  11975. 3
  11976. 3
  11977. 3
  11978. 3
  11979. 3
  11980. 3
  11981. 3
  11982. 3
  11983. 3
  11984. 3
  11985. 3
  11986. 3
  11987. 3
  11988. 3
  11989. 3
  11990. 3
  11991. 3
  11992. 3
  11993. 3
  11994. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    3
  11995. 3
  11996. 3
  11997. 3
  11998. 3
  11999. 3
  12000. 3
  12001. 3
  12002. 3
  12003. 3
  12004. 3
  12005. 3
  12006. 3
  12007. 3
  12008. 3
  12009. 3
  12010. 3
  12011. 3
  12012. 3
  12013. 3
  12014. 3
  12015. 3
  12016. 3
  12017. 3
  12018. 3
  12019. 3
  12020. 3
  12021. 3
  12022. 3
  12023. 3
  12024. 3
  12025. 3
  12026. 3
  12027. 3
  12028. 3
  12029. 3
  12030. 3
  12031. 3
  12032. 3
  12033. 3
  12034. 3
  12035. 3
  12036. 3
  12037. 3
  12038. 3
  12039. 3
  12040. 3
  12041. 3
  12042. 3
  12043. 3
  12044. 3
  12045. 3
  12046. 3
  12047. 3
  12048. 3
  12049. 3
  12050. 3
  12051. 3
  12052. 3
  12053. 3
  12054. 3
  12055. 3
  12056. 3
  12057. 3
  12058. 3
  12059. 3
  12060. 3
  12061. 3
  12062. 3
  12063. 3
  12064. 3
  12065. 3
  12066. 3
  12067. 3
  12068. 3
  12069. 3
  12070. 3
  12071. 3
  12072. 3
  12073. 3
  12074. 3
  12075. 3
  12076. 3
  12077. 3
  12078. 3
  12079. 3
  12080. 3
  12081. 3
  12082. 3
  12083. 3
  12084. 3
  12085. 3
  12086. 3
  12087. 3
  12088. 3
  12089. 3
  12090. 3
  12091. 3
  12092. 3
  12093. 3
  12094. 3
  12095. 3
  12096. 3
  12097. 3
  12098. 3
  12099. 3
  12100. 3
  12101. 3
  12102. 3
  12103. 3
  12104. 3
  12105. 3
  12106. 3
  12107. 3
  12108. 3
  12109. 3
  12110. 3
  12111. 3
  12112. 3
  12113. 3
  12114. 3
  12115. 3
  12116. 3
  12117. 3
  12118. 3
  12119. 3
  12120. 3
  12121. 3
  12122. Repost from ... @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    3
  12123. 3
  12124. 3
  12125. 3
  12126. 3
  12127. 3
  12128. 3
  12129. 3
  12130. 3
  12131. 3
  12132. 3
  12133. 3
  12134. 3
  12135. 3
  12136. 3
  12137. 3
  12138. 3
  12139. 3
  12140. 3
  12141. 3
  12142. 3
  12143. 3
  12144. 3
  12145. 3
  12146. 3
  12147. 3
  12148. 3
  12149. 3
  12150. 3
  12151. 3
  12152. 3
  12153. 3
  12154. 3
  12155. 3
  12156. 3
  12157. 3
  12158. 3
  12159. 3
  12160. 3
  12161. 3
  12162. 3
  12163. 3
  12164. 3
  12165. 3
  12166. 3
  12167. 3
  12168. 3
  12169. 3
  12170. 3
  12171. 3
  12172.  @MrRicky4309  You are correct. Q: In your speech, you established per se the century of Asia, and then concluded with optimism. So Asian century is with us; we want to remain positive. However, I was impressed by your presentation — by the US-China rivalry, and ASEAN does not want to take any side, and no one would like to see a new Cold War. You mentioned all these and that was really impressive. Regarding that, I would like to widen my first question. Nikkei had an interview with Deputy Prime Minister Wong; in that interview, you said that our policy is neither pro-US nor pro-China, so could you elaborate this further please? In relation to this, US is asking ASEAN to choose either democracy or autocracy. Unfortunately, Singapore has not been invited to the US-hosted Democracy Summit two years in a row. I was wondering if you have any opinion about that as well, please. DPM: Thank you. Singapore does not choose countries. We chose principles and one key principle is that of territorial integrity and sovereignty, as well as the freedom for countries not to be attacked by others as enshrined in the United Nations Charter. Over the years, Singapore has consistently chosen and adhered to this fundamental principle. Whenever conflicts or issues arise, you can look at our track record, we have consistently adopted this stance and most recently, of course, when Russia invaded Ukraine. We hope that through our consistent actions, everyone knows what Singapore stands for. You may disagree with us and that is fine because there will always be differences in views between countries. But through our consistent, predictable and principled actions, we hope that we can be a more reliable and trusted partner for countries everywhere around the world. The other question that was asked was on the Democracy Summit, let me share my perspective on this. We know who we are – the facts about our democracy speak for themselves. We are comfortable with who we are, and we really do not need external parties or external events to validate our status. If you ask: does Singapore have the characteristics of other Western liberal democracies? The answer is not all (the characteristics). And in fact, we do not blindly copy what others do. We adapt and learn, and we apply and develop a model that is suitable for our needs, our own circumstances, and that model has worked so far and has delivered good outcomes. In fact, surveys will indicate – and these are surveys done by external parties – that there is a high level of trust in the elected government in Singapore; there is a high level of trust for public agencies and for institutions like the police, the media, and the judiciary. So this is a system that works well for us. We will continue to develop it; the system is not static. It will continue to evolve, but how it evolves will ultimately depend on Singaporeans, not external parties. We will have to determine our own fate. And I have no doubt that if my party, the ruling party – me and my team – if we do not deliver, if we fall short of the standards and expectations that Singaporeans have of us, they may well choose alternative candidates to form the next government. So that is Singapore. But the point raised has a broader issue because it is not just about Singapore. If you look around the world, there are diverse nation states, very complex nation states, all with their own deep cultures and long histories. Many have developed their own governance and political systems over time. Not every country has universal suffrage like Singapore. But if you were to do a survey of these countries, I think in quite a number of them, they will tell you the majority of the people will be quite happy with their systems, rather than to have external parties impose their values, their systems on them. And I think they need to respect that. So, the reality is that we live in a more complex world, far more complex world that cannot be easily distilled into binary labels. And I think rather than have such frameworks that split the world or divide the world into opposing hands, it is far more important for us to find ways for countries to build common cause with one another, to coexist and work together despite our differences. And I know that that is something that Japan has been focusing on as part of its G7 presidency and Singapore fully supports such efforts to strengthen multilateralism and build a rules-based global order.
    3
  12173. 3
  12174. 3
  12175. 3
  12176. 3
  12177. 3
  12178. 3
  12179. 3
  12180. 3
  12181. 3
  12182. 3
  12183. 3
  12184. 3
  12185. 3
  12186. 3
  12187. 3
  12188. 3
  12189. 3
  12190. 3
  12191. 3
  12192. 3
  12193. 3
  12194. 3
  12195. 3
  12196. 3
  12197. 3
  12198. 3
  12199. 3
  12200. 3
  12201. 3
  12202. 3
  12203. 3
  12204. 3
  12205. 3
  12206. 3
  12207. 3
  12208. 3
  12209. 3
  12210. 3
  12211. 3
  12212. 3
  12213. 3
  12214. 3
  12215. 3
  12216. 3
  12217. 3
  12218. 3
  12219. 3
  12220. 3
  12221. 3
  12222. 3
  12223. 3
  12224. 3
  12225. 3
  12226. 3
  12227. 3
  12228. 3
  12229. 3
  12230. 3
  12231. 3
  12232. 3
  12233. 3
  12234. 3
  12235. 3
  12236. 3
  12237. 3
  12238. 3
  12239. 3
  12240. 3
  12241. 3
  12242. 3
  12243. 3
  12244. 3
  12245. 3
  12246. 3
  12247. 3
  12248. 3
  12249. 3
  12250. 3
  12251. 3
  12252. 3
  12253. 3
  12254. 3
  12255. 3
  12256. 3
  12257. 3
  12258. 3
  12259. 3
  12260. 3
  12261. 3
  12262. 3
  12263. 3
  12264. 3
  12265. 3
  12266. 3
  12267. 3
  12268. 3
  12269. 3
  12270. 3
  12271. 3
  12272. 3
  12273. 3
  12274. 3
  12275. 3
  12276. 3
  12277. 3
  12278. 3
  12279. 3
  12280. 3
  12281. 3
  12282. 3
  12283. 3
  12284. 3
  12285. 3
  12286. 3
  12287. 3
  12288. 3
  12289. 3
  12290. 3
  12291. 3
  12292. 3
  12293. 3
  12294. 3
  12295. 3
  12296. 3
  12297. UK need help also ... The Guardian said on the 26th that the Sutton Foundation interviewed 1,000 British students when conducting a survey. According to the report, in addition to skipping a meal to save money, some of the interviewed students rely on poor student grants or family support to maintain daily expenses. According to the survey, nearly half of the interviewed students asked their families for help and asked them to provide financial support, but many interviewed students from disadvantaged or poorer backgrounds said that they could not do this, or they were less likely to receive financial support from their families. One of the interviewed students studying in England said that although he has received a full maintenance loan and a scholarship from the university, it is still not enough to meet living expenses. In order to save money to cope with life, the student only eats 2 meals a day, reduces spending on food, and works part-time. With the high cost of living, not only students but also working people are forced to cut down on food and clothing to save money. The British coroner confirmed on the 23rd that Yee-King Ho, a 27-year-old Hong Kong woman who immigrated to the UK in April 2022, committed suicide. The reason is suspected to be related to being unable to cope with high living expenses and suffering from mental illness. The British "Sun" stated on the 25th that she suffered from insomnia and hair loss problems during her lifetime, and she could only eat one meal a day.
    3
  12298. 3
  12299. 3
  12300. 3
  12301. 3
  12302. 3
  12303. 3
  12304. 3
  12305. 3
  12306. 3
  12307. 3
  12308. 3
  12309. 3
  12310. 3
  12311. 3
  12312. 3
  12313. 3
  12314. 3
  12315. 3
  12316. 3
  12317. 3
  12318. 3
  12319. 3
  12320. 3
  12321. 3
  12322. 3
  12323. 3
  12324. 3
  12325. 3
  12326. 3
  12327. 3
  12328. 3
  12329. 3
  12330. 3
  12331. 3
  12332. 3
  12333. 3
  12334. 3
  12335. 3
  12336. 3
  12337. 3
  12338. 3
  12339. 3
  12340. 3
  12341. 3
  12342. 3
  12343. 3
  12344. 3
  12345. 3
  12346. 3
  12347. 3
  12348. 3
  12349. 3
  12350. 3
  12351. 3
  12352. 3
  12353. 3
  12354. 3
  12355. 3
  12356. 3
  12357. 3
  12358. 3
  12359. 3
  12360. 3
  12361. 3
  12362. 3
  12363. 3
  12364. 3
  12365. 3
  12366. 3
  12367. 3
  12368. 3
  12369. 3
  12370. 3
  12371. 3
  12372. 3
  12373. 3
  12374. 3
  12375. 3
  12376. 3
  12377. 3
  12378. 3
  12379. 3
  12380. 3
  12381. 3
  12382. 3
  12383. 3
  12384. 3
  12385. 3
  12386. 3
  12387. 3
  12388. 3
  12389. 3
  12390. 3
  12391. 3
  12392. 3
  12393. 3
  12394. 3
  12395. 3
  12396. 3
  12397. 3
  12398. 3
  12399. 3
  12400. 3
  12401. 3
  12402. 3
  12403. 3
  12404. 3
  12405. 3
  12406. 3
  12407. 3
  12408. 3
  12409. 3
  12410. 3
  12411. 3
  12412. 3
  12413. 3
  12414. 3
  12415. 3
  12416. 3
  12417. 3
  12418. 3
  12419. 3
  12420. 3
  12421. 3
  12422. 3
  12423. 3
  12424. 3
  12425. 3
  12426. 3
  12427. 3
  12428. 3
  12429. 3
  12430. 3
  12431. 3
  12432. 3
  12433. 3
  12434. 3
  12435. 3
  12436. 3
  12437. 3
  12438. 3
  12439. 3
  12440. 3
  12441. 3
  12442. 3
  12443. 3
  12444. 3
  12445. 3
  12446. 3
  12447. 3
  12448. 3
  12449. 3
  12450. 3
  12451. 3
  12452. 3
  12453. 3
  12454. 3
  12455. 3
  12456. 3
  12457. 3
  12458. 3
  12459. 3
  12460. 3
  12461. 3
  12462. 3
  12463. 3
  12464. 3
  12465. 3
  12466. 3
  12467. 3
  12468. 3
  12469. 3
  12470. 3
  12471. 3
  12472. 3
  12473. 3
  12474. 3
  12475. 3
  12476. 3
  12477. 3
  12478. 3
  12479. 3
  12480. 3
  12481. 3
  12482. 3
  12483. 3
  12484. 3
  12485. 3
  12486. 3
  12487. 3
  12488. 3
  12489. 3
  12490. 3
  12491. 3
  12492. 3
  12493. 3
  12494. 3
  12495. 3
  12496. 3
  12497. 3
  12498. 3
  12499. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    3
  12500. 3
  12501. 3
  12502. 3
  12503. 3
  12504. 3
  12505. 3
  12506. 3
  12507. 3
  12508. 3
  12509. 3
  12510. 3
  12511. 3
  12512. 3
  12513. 3
  12514. 3
  12515. 3
  12516. 3
  12517. 3
  12518. 3
  12519. 3
  12520. 3
  12521. 3
  12522. 3
  12523. 3
  12524. 3
  12525. 3
  12526. 3
  12527. 3
  12528. 3
  12529. 3
  12530. 3
  12531. 3
  12532. 3
  12533. 3
  12534. 3
  12535. 3
  12536. 3
  12537. 3
  12538. 3
  12539. 3
  12540. 3
  12541. 3
  12542. 3
  12543. 3
  12544. 3
  12545. 3
  12546. 3
  12547. 3
  12548. 3
  12549. 3
  12550. 3
  12551. 3
  12552. 3
  12553. 3
  12554. 3
  12555. 3
  12556. 3
  12557. 3
  12558. 3
  12559. 3
  12560. 3
  12561. 3
  12562. 3
  12563. 3
  12564. 3
  12565. 3
  12566. 3
  12567. 3
  12568. 3
  12569. 3
  12570. 3
  12571. 3
  12572. 3
  12573. 3
  12574. 3
  12575. 3
  12576. 3
  12577. 3
  12578. 3
  12579. 3
  12580. 3
  12581. 3
  12582. 3
  12583. 3
  12584. 3
  12585. 3
  12586. 3
  12587. 3
  12588. 3
  12589. 3
  12590. 3
  12591. 3
  12592. 3
  12593. 3
  12594. 3
  12595. 3
  12596. 3
  12597. 3
  12598. 3
  12599. 3
  12600. 3
  12601. 3
  12602. 3
  12603. 3
  12604. 3
  12605. 3
  12606. 3
  12607. 3
  12608. 3
  12609. 3
  12610. 3
  12611. 3
  12612. 3
  12613. 3
  12614. 3
  12615. 3
  12616. 3
  12617. 3
  12618. 3
  12619. 3
  12620. 3
  12621. 3
  12622. 3
  12623. 3
  12624. 3
  12625. 3
  12626. 3
  12627. 3
  12628. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    3
  12629. 3
  12630. 3
  12631. 3
  12632. 3
  12633. 3
  12634. 3
  12635. 3
  12636. 3
  12637. 3
  12638. 3
  12639. 3
  12640. 3
  12641. 3
  12642. 3
  12643. 3
  12644. 3
  12645. 3
  12646. 3
  12647. 3
  12648. 3
  12649. 3
  12650. 3
  12651. 3
  12652. 3
  12653. 3
  12654. 3
  12655. 3
  12656. 3
  12657. 3
  12658. 3
  12659. 3
  12660. 3
  12661. 3
  12662. 3
  12663. 3
  12664. 3
  12665. 3
  12666. 3
  12667. 3
  12668. 3
  12669. 3
  12670. 3
  12671. 3
  12672. 3
  12673. 3
  12674. 3
  12675. 3
  12676. 3
  12677. 3
  12678. 3
  12679. 3
  12680. 3
  12681. 3
  12682. 3
  12683. 3
  12684. 3
  12685. 3
  12686. 3
  12687. 3
  12688. 3
  12689. 3
  12690. 3
  12691. 3
  12692. 3
  12693. 3
  12694. 3
  12695. 3
  12696. 3
  12697. 3
  12698. 3
  12699. 3
  12700. 3
  12701. 3
  12702. 3
  12703. 3
  12704. 3
  12705. 3
  12706. 3
  12707. 3
  12708. 3
  12709. 3
  12710. 3
  12711. 3
  12712. 3
  12713. 3
  12714. 3
  12715. 3
  12716. 3
  12717. 3
  12718. 3
  12719. 3
  12720. 3
  12721. 3
  12722. 3
  12723. 3
  12724. 3
  12725. 3
  12726. 3
  12727. 3
  12728. 3
  12729. 3
  12730. 3
  12731. 3
  12732. 3
  12733. 3
  12734. 3
  12735. 3
  12736. 3
  12737. 3
  12738. 3
  12739. 3
  12740. 3
  12741. 3
  12742. 3
  12743. 3
  12744. 3
  12745. 3
  12746. 3
  12747. 3
  12748. 3
  12749. 3
  12750. 3
  12751. 3
  12752. 3
  12753. 3
  12754. 3
  12755. 3
  12756. 3
  12757. 3
  12758. 3
  12759. 3
  12760. 3
  12761. 3
  12762. 3
  12763. 3
  12764. 3
  12765. 3
  12766. 3
  12767. 3
  12768. 3
  12769. 3
  12770. 3
  12771. 3
  12772. 3
  12773. 3
  12774. 3
  12775. 3
  12776. 3
  12777. 3
  12778. 3
  12779. 3
  12780. 3
  12781. 3
  12782. 3
  12783. 3
  12784. 3
  12785. 3
  12786. 3
  12787. 3
  12788. 3
  12789. 3
  12790. 3
  12791. 3
  12792. 3
  12793. 3
  12794. 3
  12795. 3
  12796. 3
  12797. 3
  12798. 3
  12799. 3
  12800. 3
  12801. 3
  12802. 3
  12803. 3
  12804. 3
  12805. 3
  12806. 3
  12807. 3
  12808. 3
  12809. 3
  12810. 3
  12811. 3
  12812. 3
  12813. 3
  12814. 3
  12815. 3
  12816. 3
  12817. 3
  12818. 3
  12819. 3
  12820. 3
  12821. 3
  12822. 3
  12823. 3
  12824. 3
  12825. 3
  12826. 3
  12827. 3
  12828. 3
  12829. 3
  12830. 3
  12831. 3
  12832. 3
  12833. 3
  12834. 3
  12835. 3
  12836. 3
  12837. 3
  12838. 3
  12839. 3
  12840. 3
  12841. 3
  12842. 3
  12843. 3
  12844. 3
  12845. 3
  12846. 3
  12847. 3
  12848. 3
  12849. 3
  12850. 3
  12851. 3
  12852. 3
  12853. 3
  12854. 3
  12855. 3
  12856. 3
  12857. 3
  12858. 3
  12859. 3
  12860. 3
  12861. 3
  12862. 3
  12863. 3
  12864. 3
  12865. 3
  12866. 3
  12867. 3
  12868. 3
  12869. 3
  12870. 3
  12871. 3
  12872. 3
  12873. 3
  12874. 3
  12875. 3
  12876. 3
  12877. 3
  12878. 3
  12879. 3
  12880. 3
  12881. 3
  12882. 3
  12883. 3
  12884. 3
  12885. 3
  12886. 3
  12887. 3
  12888. 3
  12889. 3
  12890. 3
  12891. 3
  12892. 3
  12893. 3
  12894. 3
  12895. 3
  12896. 3
  12897. 3
  12898. 3
  12899. 3
  12900. 3
  12901. 3
  12902. 3
  12903. 3
  12904. 3
  12905. 3
  12906. 3
  12907. 3
  12908. 3
  12909. 3
  12910. 3
  12911. 3
  12912. 3
  12913. 3
  12914. 3
  12915. 3
  12916. 3
  12917. 3
  12918. 3
  12919. 3
  12920. 3
  12921. 3
  12922. 3
  12923. 3
  12924. 3
  12925. 3
  12926. 3
  12927. 3
  12928. 3
  12929. 3
  12930. 3
  12931. 3
  12932. 3
  12933. 3
  12934. 3
  12935. 3
  12936. 3
  12937. 3
  12938. 3
  12939. 3
  12940. 3
  12941. 3
  12942. 3
  12943. 3
  12944. 3
  12945. 3
  12946. 3
  12947. 3
  12948. 3
  12949. 3
  12950. 3
  12951. 3
  12952. 3
  12953. 3
  12954. 3
  12955. 3
  12956. 3
  12957. 3
  12958. 3
  12959. 3
  12960. 12-9-2023 Germany's Baerbock Humiliated In Dressing Down By Ukraine Foreign Minister Things took a turn at the joint presser when a journalist asked about the difficulties of the counteroffensive along the southern front, and posed whether Kubela thinks Kiev's Western backers should supply weapons like the Taurus "quicker and faster".... Kubela then explained he had pressed the German delegation for Taurus deliveries as soon as possible, but that Baerbock left him no "hope" in these meetings. He then in a smug and patronizing tone looked toward her and said: "No, she didn't go beyond the official position of the German government... but you'll do it anyway, it's just a matter of time." "You will do it anyway, its just a matter of time, and I don't understand why we are wasting time," Kuleba said in response to a question at a press conference. Kubula then described that more and more Ukrainian lives have been lost due to Western delays in weapons approval and deliveries. The suggestion was that it's Berlin's fault (and that of other slow to play along allies). Online commentators were quick to point out how "embarrassing" and "pathetic" the moment was for the German side. Others pointed out the "arrogance" on display by Kubela, given also she made the lengthy, dangerous trip into Kiev to announce new humanitarian aid. Such "gifts" weren't enough. One regional commentator had this to say in response to the clip: "So here we have a US protectorate (Germany) being publicly mocked by a US proxy (Ukraine). One of the pitfalls of military alignment — the interests of the alliance as defined by the alliance leader is always supreme."
    3
  12961. 3
  12962. 3
  12963. 3
  12964. 3
  12965. 3
  12966. 3
  12967. 3
  12968. 3
  12969. 3
  12970. 3
  12971. 3
  12972. 3
  12973. 3
  12974. 3
  12975. 3
  12976. 3
  12977. 3
  12978. 3
  12979. 3
  12980. 3
  12981. 3
  12982. 3
  12983. 3
  12984. 3
  12985. 3
  12986. 3
  12987. 3
  12988. 3
  12989. 3
  12990. 3
  12991. 3
  12992. 3
  12993. 3
  12994. 3
  12995. 3
  12996. 3
  12997. 3
  12998. 3
  12999. 3
  13000. 3
  13001. 3
  13002. 3
  13003. 3
  13004. 3
  13005. 3
  13006. 3
  13007. 3
  13008. 3
  13009. 3
  13010. 3
  13011. 3
  13012. 3
  13013. 3
  13014. 3
  13015. 3
  13016. 3
  13017. 3
  13018. 3
  13019. 3
  13020. 3
  13021. 3
  13022. 3
  13023. 3
  13024. 3
  13025. 3
  13026. 3
  13027. 3
  13028. 3
  13029. 3
  13030. 3
  13031. 3
  13032. 3
  13033. 3
  13034. 3
  13035. 3
  13036. 3
  13037. 3
  13038. 3
  13039. 3
  13040. 3
  13041. 3
  13042. 3
  13043. 3
  13044. 3
  13045. 3
  13046. 3
  13047. 3
  13048. 3
  13049. 3
  13050. 3
  13051. 3
  13052. 3
  13053. 3
  13054. 3
  13055. 3
  13056. 3
  13057. 3
  13058. 3
  13059. 3
  13060. 3
  13061. 3
  13062. 3
  13063. 3
  13064. 3
  13065. 3
  13066. 3
  13067. 3
  13068. 3
  13069. 3
  13070. 3
  13071. 3
  13072. 3
  13073. 3
  13074. 3
  13075. 3
  13076. 3
  13077. 3
  13078. 3
  13079. 3
  13080. 3
  13081. 3
  13082. 3
  13083. 3
  13084. 3
  13085. 3
  13086. 3
  13087. 3
  13088. 3
  13089. 3
  13090. 3
  13091. 3
  13092. 3
  13093. 3
  13094. 3
  13095. 3
  13096. 3
  13097. 3
  13098. 3
  13099. 3
  13100. 3
  13101. 3
  13102. 3
  13103. 3
  13104. 3
  13105. 3
  13106. 3
  13107. 3
  13108. 3
  13109. 3
  13110. 3
  13111. 3
  13112. 3
  13113. 3
  13114. 3
  13115. 3
  13116. 3
  13117. 3
  13118. 3
  13119. 3
  13120. 3
  13121. 3
  13122. 3
  13123. 3
  13124. 3
  13125. 3
  13126. 3
  13127. 3
  13128. 3
  13129. 3
  13130. 3
  13131. 3
  13132. 3
  13133. 3
  13134. 3
  13135. 3
  13136. 3
  13137. 3
  13138. 3
  13139. 3
  13140. 3
  13141. 3
  13142. 3
  13143. 3
  13144. 3
  13145. 3
  13146. 3
  13147. 3
  13148. 3
  13149. 3
  13150. 3
  13151. 3
  13152. 3
  13153. 3
  13154. 3
  13155. 3
  13156. 3
  13157. 3
  13158. 3
  13159. 3
  13160. 3
  13161. 3
  13162. 3
  13163. 3
  13164. 3
  13165. 3
  13166. 3
  13167. 3
  13168. 3
  13169. 3
  13170. 3
  13171. 3
  13172. 3
  13173. 3
  13174. 3
  13175. 3
  13176. 3
  13177. 3
  13178. 3
  13179. 3
  13180. 3
  13181. 3
  13182. 3
  13183. 3
  13184. 3
  13185. 3
  13186. 3
  13187. 3
  13188. 3
  13189. 3
  13190. 3
  13191. 3
  13192. 3
  13193. 3
  13194. 3
  13195. 3
  13196. 3
  13197. 3
  13198. 3
  13199. 3
  13200. 3
  13201. 3
  13202. 3
  13203. 3
  13204. 3
  13205. 3
  13206. 3
  13207. 3
  13208. 3
  13209. 3
  13210. 3
  13211. 3
  13212. 3
  13213. 3
  13214. 3
  13215. 3
  13216. 3
  13217. 3
  13218. 3
  13219. 3
  13220. 3
  13221. 3
  13222. 3
  13223. 3
  13224. 3
  13225. 3
  13226. 3
  13227. 3
  13228. 3
  13229. 3
  13230. 3
  13231. 3
  13232. 3
  13233. 3
  13234. 3
  13235. 3
  13236. 3
  13237. 3
  13238. 3
  13239. 3
  13240. 3
  13241. 3
  13242. 3
  13243. 3
  13244. 3
  13245. 3
  13246. 3
  13247. 3
  13248. 3
  13249. 3
  13250. 3
  13251. 3
  13252. 3
  13253. 3
  13254. 3
  13255. 3
  13256. 3
  13257. 3
  13258. 3
  13259. 3
  13260. 3
  13261. 3
  13262. 3
  13263. 3
  13264. 3
  13265. 3
  13266. 3
  13267. 3
  13268. 3
  13269. 3
  13270. 3
  13271. 3
  13272. 3
  13273. 3
  13274. 3
  13275. 3
  13276. 2
  13277. 2
  13278. 2
  13279. 2
  13280. 2
  13281. 2
  13282. 2
  13283. 2
  13284. 2
  13285. 2
  13286. 2
  13287. 2
  13288. 2
  13289. 2
  13290. 2
  13291. 2
  13292. 2
  13293. 2
  13294. 2
  13295. 2
  13296. 2
  13297. 2
  13298. 2
  13299. 2
  13300. 2
  13301. 2
  13302. 2
  13303. 2
  13304. 2
  13305. 2
  13306. 2
  13307. 2
  13308. 2
  13309. 2
  13310. 2
  13311. 2
  13312. 2
  13313. 2
  13314. 2
  13315. 2
  13316. 2
  13317. 2
  13318. 2
  13319. 2
  13320. 2
  13321. 2
  13322. 2
  13323. 2
  13324. 2
  13325. 2
  13326. 2
  13327. 2
  13328. 2
  13329. 2
  13330. 2
  13331. 2
  13332. 2
  13333. 2
  13334. 2
  13335. 2
  13336. 2
  13337. 2
  13338. 2
  13339. 2
  13340. 2
  13341. 2
  13342. 2
  13343. 2
  13344. 2
  13345. 2
  13346. 2
  13347. 2
  13348. 12-9-2023 Germany's Baerbock Humiliated In Dressing Down By Ukraine Foreign Minister Things took a turn at the joint presser when a journalist asked about the difficulties of the counteroffensive along the southern front, and posed whether Kubela thinks Kiev's Western backers should supply weapons like the Taurus "quicker and faster".... Kubela then explained he had pressed the German delegation for Taurus deliveries as soon as possible, but that Baerbock left him no "hope" in these meetings. He then in a smug and patronizing tone looked toward her and said: "No, she didn't go beyond the official position of the German government... but you'll do it anyway, it's just a matter of time." "You will do it anyway, its just a matter of time, and I don't understand why we are wasting time," Kuleba said in response to a question at a press conference. Kubula then described that more and more Ukrainian lives have been lost due to Western delays in weapons approval and deliveries. The suggestion was that it's Berlin's fault (and that of other slow to play along allies). Online commentators were quick to point out how "embarrassing" and "pathetic" the moment was for the German side. Others pointed out the "arrogance" on display by Kubela, given also she made the lengthy, dangerous trip into Kiev to announce new humanitarian aid. Such "gifts" weren't enough. One regional commentator had this to say in response to the clip: "So here we have a US protectorate (Germany) being publicly mocked by a US proxy (Ukraine). One of the pitfalls of military alignment — the interests of the alliance as defined by the alliance leader is always supreme."
    2
  13349. 2
  13350. 2
  13351. 2
  13352. 2
  13353. 2
  13354. 2
  13355. 2
  13356. 2
  13357. 2
  13358. 2
  13359. 2
  13360. 2
  13361. 2
  13362. 2
  13363. 2
  13364. 2
  13365. 2
  13366. 2
  13367. 2
  13368. 2
  13369. 2
  13370. 2
  13371. 2
  13372. 2
  13373. 2
  13374. 2
  13375. 2
  13376. 2
  13377. 2
  13378. 2
  13379. 2
  13380. 2
  13381. 2
  13382. 2
  13383. 2
  13384. 2
  13385. 2
  13386. 2
  13387. 2
  13388. 2
  13389. 2
  13390. 2
  13391. 2
  13392. 2
  13393. 2
  13394. 2
  13395. 2
  13396. 2
  13397. 2
  13398. 2
  13399. 2
  13400. 2
  13401. 2
  13402. 2
  13403. 2
  13404. 2
  13405. 2
  13406. 2
  13407. 2
  13408. 2
  13409. 2
  13410. 2
  13411. 2
  13412. 2
  13413. 2
  13414. 2
  13415. 2
  13416. 2
  13417. 2
  13418. 2
  13419. 2
  13420. 2
  13421. 2
  13422. 2
  13423. 2
  13424. 2
  13425. 2
  13426. 2
  13427. 2
  13428. 2
  13429. 2
  13430. 2
  13431. 2
  13432. 2
  13433. 2
  13434. 2
  13435. 2
  13436. 2
  13437. 2
  13438. 2
  13439. 2
  13440. 2
  13441. 2
  13442. 2
  13443. 2
  13444. 2
  13445. 2
  13446. 2
  13447. 2
  13448. 2
  13449. 2
  13450. 2
  13451. 2
  13452. 2
  13453. 2
  13454. 2
  13455. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  13456. 2
  13457. 2
  13458. 2
  13459. 2
  13460. 2
  13461. 2
  13462. 2
  13463. 2
  13464. 2
  13465. 2
  13466. 2
  13467. 2
  13468. 2
  13469. 2
  13470. 2
  13471. 2
  13472. 2
  13473. 2
  13474. 2
  13475. 2
  13476. 2
  13477. 2
  13478. 2
  13479. 2
  13480. 2
  13481. 2
  13482. 2
  13483. 2
  13484. 2
  13485. 2
  13486. 2
  13487. 2
  13488. 2
  13489. 2
  13490. 2
  13491. 2
  13492. 2
  13493. 2
  13494. 2
  13495. 2
  13496. 2
  13497. 2
  13498. 2
  13499. 2
  13500. 2
  13501. 2
  13502. 2
  13503. 2
  13504. 2
  13505. 2
  13506. 2
  13507. 2
  13508. 2
  13509. 2
  13510. 2
  13511. 2
  13512. 2
  13513. 2
  13514. 2
  13515. 2
  13516. 2
  13517. 2
  13518. 2
  13519. 2
  13520. 2
  13521. 2
  13522. 2
  13523. 2
  13524. 2
  13525. 2
  13526. 2
  13527. 2
  13528. 2
  13529. 2
  13530. 2
  13531. 2
  13532. 2
  13533. 2
  13534. 2
  13535. 2
  13536. 2
  13537. 2
  13538. 2
  13539. 2
  13540. 2
  13541. 2
  13542. 2
  13543. 2
  13544. 2
  13545. 2
  13546. 2
  13547. 2
  13548. 2
  13549. 2
  13550. 2
  13551. 2
  13552. 2
  13553. 2
  13554. 2
  13555. 2
  13556. 2
  13557. 2
  13558. 2
  13559. 2
  13560. 2
  13561. 2
  13562. 2
  13563. 2
  13564. 2
  13565. 2
  13566. 2
  13567. 2
  13568. 2
  13569. 2
  13570. 2
  13571. 2
  13572. 2
  13573. 2
  13574. 2
  13575. 2
  13576. 2
  13577. 2
  13578. 2
  13579. 2
  13580. 2
  13581. 2
  13582. 2
  13583. 2
  13584. 2
  13585. 2
  13586. 2
  13587. 2
  13588. 2
  13589. 2
  13590. 2
  13591. 2
  13592. 2
  13593. 2
  13594. 2
  13595. 2
  13596. 2
  13597. 2
  13598. 2
  13599. 2
  13600. 2
  13601. 2
  13602. 2
  13603. 2
  13604. 2
  13605. 2
  13606. 2
  13607. 2
  13608. 2
  13609. 2
  13610. 2
  13611. 2
  13612. 2
  13613. 2
  13614. 2
  13615. 2
  13616. 2
  13617. 2
  13618. 2
  13619. 2
  13620. 2
  13621. 2
  13622. 2
  13623. 2
  13624. 2
  13625. 2
  13626. 2
  13627. 2
  13628. 2
  13629. 2
  13630. 2
  13631. 2
  13632. 2
  13633. 2
  13634. 2
  13635. 2
  13636. 2
  13637. 2
  13638. 2
  13639. 2
  13640. 2
  13641. 2
  13642. 2
  13643. 2
  13644. 2
  13645. 2
  13646. 2
  13647. 2
  13648. 2
  13649. 2
  13650. 2
  13651. 2
  13652. 2
  13653. 2
  13654. 2
  13655. 2
  13656. 2
  13657. 2
  13658. 2
  13659. 2
  13660. 2
  13661. 2
  13662. 2
  13663. 2
  13664. 2
  13665. 2
  13666. 2
  13667. 2
  13668. 2
  13669. 2
  13670. 2
  13671. 2
  13672. 2
  13673. 2
  13674. 2
  13675. 2
  13676. 2
  13677. 2
  13678. 2
  13679. 2
  13680. 2
  13681. 2
  13682. 2
  13683. 2
  13684. 2
  13685. 2
  13686. 2
  13687. 2
  13688. 2
  13689. 2
  13690. 2
  13691. 2
  13692. 2
  13693. 2
  13694. 2
  13695. 2
  13696. 2
  13697. 2
  13698. 2
  13699. 2
  13700. 2
  13701. 2
  13702. 2
  13703. 2
  13704. 2
  13705. 2
  13706. 2
  13707. 2
  13708. 2
  13709. 2
  13710. 2
  13711. 2
  13712. 2
  13713. 2
  13714. 2
  13715. 2
  13716. 2
  13717. 2
  13718. 2
  13719. 2
  13720. 2
  13721. 2
  13722. 2
  13723. 2
  13724. 2
  13725. 2
  13726. 2
  13727. 2
  13728. 2
  13729. 2
  13730. 2
  13731. 2
  13732. 2
  13733. 2
  13734. 2
  13735. 2
  13736. 2
  13737. 2
  13738. 2
  13739. 2
  13740. 2
  13741. 2
  13742. 2
  13743. 2
  13744. 2
  13745. 2
  13746. 2
  13747. 2
  13748. 2
  13749. 2
  13750. 2
  13751. 2
  13752. 2
  13753. 2
  13754. 2
  13755. 2
  13756. 2
  13757. 2
  13758. 2
  13759. 2
  13760. 2
  13761. 2
  13762. 2
  13763. 2
  13764. 2
  13765. 2
  13766. 2
  13767. 2
  13768. 2
  13769. 2
  13770. 2
  13771. 2
  13772. 2
  13773. 2
  13774. 2
  13775. 2
  13776. 2
  13777. 2
  13778. 2
  13779. 2
  13780. 2
  13781. 2
  13782. 2
  13783. 2
  13784. 2
  13785. 2
  13786. 2
  13787. 2
  13788. 2
  13789. 2
  13790. 2
  13791. 2
  13792. 2
  13793. 2
  13794. 2
  13795. 2
  13796. 2
  13797. 2
  13798. 2
  13799. 2
  13800. 2
  13801. 2
  13802. 2
  13803. 2
  13804. 2
  13805. 2
  13806. 2
  13807. 2
  13808. 2
  13809. 2
  13810. 2
  13811. 2
  13812. 2
  13813. 2
  13814. 2
  13815. 2
  13816. 2
  13817. 2
  13818. 2
  13819. 2
  13820. 2
  13821. 2
  13822. 2
  13823. 2
  13824. 2
  13825. 2
  13826. 2
  13827. 2
  13828. 2
  13829. 2
  13830. 2
  13831. 2
  13832. 2
  13833. 2
  13834. 2
  13835. 2
  13836. 2
  13837. 2
  13838. 2
  13839. 2
  13840. 2
  13841. 2
  13842. 2
  13843. 2
  13844. 2
  13845. 2
  13846. 2
  13847. 2
  13848. 2
  13849. 2
  13850. 2
  13851. 2
  13852. 2
  13853. 2
  13854. 2
  13855. 2
  13856. 2
  13857. 2
  13858. 2
  13859. 2
  13860. 2
  13861. 2
  13862. 2
  13863. 2
  13864. 2
  13865. 2
  13866. 2
  13867. 2
  13868. 2
  13869. 2
  13870. 2
  13871. 2
  13872. 2
  13873. 2
  13874. 2
  13875. 2
  13876. 2
  13877. 2
  13878. 2
  13879. 2
  13880. 2
  13881. 2
  13882. 2
  13883. 2
  13884. 2
  13885. 2
  13886. 2
  13887. 2
  13888. 2
  13889. 2
  13890. 2
  13891. UN : Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    2
  13892. 2
  13893. 2
  13894. 2
  13895. 2
  13896. 2
  13897. 2
  13898. 2
  13899. 2
  13900. 2
  13901. 2
  13902. 2
  13903. 2
  13904. 2
  13905. 2
  13906. 2
  13907. 2
  13908. 2
  13909. 2
  13910. 2
  13911. 2
  13912. 2
  13913. 2
  13914. 2
  13915. 2
  13916. 2
  13917. 2
  13918. 2
  13919. 2
  13920. 2
  13921. 2
  13922. 2
  13923. 2
  13924. 2
  13925. 2
  13926. 2
  13927. 2
  13928. 2
  13929. 2
  13930. 2
  13931. 2
  13932. 2
  13933. 2
  13934. 2
  13935. 2
  13936. 2
  13937. 2
  13938. 2
  13939. 2
  13940. 2
  13941. 2
  13942. 2
  13943. 2
  13944. 2
  13945. 2
  13946. 2
  13947. 2
  13948. 2
  13949. 2
  13950. 2
  13951. 2
  13952. 2
  13953. 2
  13954. 2
  13955. 2
  13956. 2
  13957. 2
  13958. 2
  13959. 2
  13960. 2
  13961. 2
  13962. 2
  13963. 2
  13964. 2
  13965. 2
  13966. 2
  13967. 2
  13968. 2
  13969. 2
  13970. 2
  13971. 2
  13972. 2
  13973. 2
  13974. 2
  13975. 2
  13976. 2
  13977. 2
  13978. 2
  13979. 2
  13980. 2
  13981. 2
  13982. 2
  13983. 2
  13984. 2
  13985. 2
  13986. 2
  13987. 2
  13988. 2
  13989. 2
  13990. 2
  13991. 2
  13992. 2
  13993. 2
  13994. 2
  13995. 2
  13996. 2
  13997. 2
  13998. 2
  13999. 2
  14000. 2
  14001. 2
  14002. 2
  14003. 2
  14004. 2
  14005. 2
  14006. 2
  14007. 2
  14008. 2
  14009. 2
  14010. 2
  14011. 2
  14012. 2
  14013. 2
  14014. 2
  14015. 2
  14016. 2
  14017. 2
  14018. 2
  14019. 2
  14020. 2
  14021. 2
  14022. 2
  14023. 2
  14024. 2
  14025. 2
  14026. 2
  14027. 2
  14028. 2
  14029. 2
  14030. 2
  14031. 2
  14032. 2
  14033. 2
  14034. 2
  14035. 2
  14036. 2
  14037. 2
  14038. 2
  14039. 2
  14040. 2
  14041. It amazes me How much politicians care more about other than own country's problems."They got money for wars, but can't feed the poor" 12-10-2022 ‘It’s humiliating’: US voters struggle with hunger ahead of midterms Economy in focus: Despite rising inflation and soaring grocery prices, food insecurity is a topic few politicians are addressing The cars started lining up at least an hour before the late shift at the Mid-Ohio Food Collective, a converted mattress factory just south of Columbus. Drivers pulled into a white tent where volunteers rolled grocery carts full of produce, meat, cake, detergent and other items toward each vehicle, efficiently loading trunks. One volunteer, 31-year-old Danyel Barwick, directed traffic with a big orange flag. It wasn’t long ago that Barwick, a Columbus mother of four, was on the other side of the food bank equation. “It was humiliating,” said Barwick, who lost her job during the pandemic in 2020 and, realizing she had no protein in the house and had used all her fast-food coupons, decided to visit a food pantry at a local church. “I was embarrassed and sad.” As US voters prepare to decide control of both houses of Congress in November, millions will head to the polls while struggling to feed themselves and their families. In 2021, according to the US Department of Agriculture, more than 13m households had trouble affording enough food. And there are signs, from census data, that food hardship could be getting worse this year.
    2
  14042. 2
  14043. 2
  14044. 2
  14045. 2
  14046. 2
  14047. 2
  14048. 2
  14049. 2
  14050. 2
  14051. 2
  14052. 2
  14053. 2
  14054. 2
  14055. 2
  14056. 2
  14057. 2
  14058. 2
  14059. 2
  14060. 2
  14061. 2
  14062. 2
  14063. 2
  14064. 2
  14065. 2
  14066. 2
  14067. 2
  14068. 2
  14069. 2
  14070. 2
  14071. 2
  14072. 2
  14073. 2
  14074. 2
  14075. 2
  14076. 2
  14077. 2
  14078. 2
  14079. 2
  14080. 2
  14081. 2
  14082. 2
  14083. 2
  14084. 2
  14085. 2
  14086. 2
  14087. 2
  14088. 2
  14089. 2
  14090. 2
  14091. 2
  14092. 2
  14093. 2
  14094. 2
  14095. 2
  14096. 2
  14097. 2
  14098. 2
  14099. 2
  14100. 2
  14101. 2
  14102. 2
  14103. 2
  14104. 2
  14105. 2
  14106. 2
  14107. 2
  14108. 2
  14109. 2
  14110. 2
  14111. 2
  14112. 2
  14113. 2
  14114. 2
  14115. 2
  14116. 2
  14117. 2
  14118. 2
  14119. 2
  14120. 2
  14121. 2
  14122. 2
  14123. 2
  14124. 2
  14125. 2
  14126. 2
  14127. 2
  14128. 2
  14129. 2
  14130. 2
  14131. 2
  14132. 2
  14133. 2
  14134. 2
  14135. 2
  14136. 2
  14137. 2
  14138. 2
  14139. 2
  14140. 2
  14141. 2
  14142. 2
  14143. 2
  14144. 2
  14145. 2
  14146. 2
  14147. 2
  14148. 2
  14149. 2
  14150. 2
  14151. 2
  14152. 2
  14153. 2
  14154. 2
  14155. 2
  14156. 2
  14157. 2
  14158. 2
  14159. 2
  14160. 2
  14161. 2
  14162. 2
  14163. 2
  14164. 2
  14165. 2
  14166. 2
  14167. 2
  14168. 2
  14169. 2
  14170. 2
  14171. 2
  14172. 2
  14173. 2
  14174. 2
  14175. 2
  14176. 2
  14177. 2
  14178. 2
  14179. 2
  14180. 2
  14181. 2
  14182. 2
  14183. 2
  14184. 2
  14185. 2
  14186. 2
  14187. 2
  14188. 2
  14189. 2
  14190. 2
  14191. 2
  14192. 2
  14193. 2
  14194. 2
  14195. 2
  14196. 2
  14197. 2
  14198. 2
  14199. 2
  14200. 2
  14201. 2
  14202. 2
  14203. 2
  14204. 2
  14205. 2
  14206. 2
  14207. 2
  14208. 2
  14209. 2
  14210. 2
  14211. 2
  14212. 2
  14213. 2
  14214. 2
  14215. 2
  14216. 2
  14217. 2
  14218. 2
  14219. 2
  14220. 2
  14221. 2
  14222. 2
  14223. 2
  14224. 2
  14225. 2
  14226. 2
  14227. 2
  14228. 2
  14229. 2
  14230. 2
  14231. 2
  14232. 2
  14233. 2
  14234. 2
  14235. 2
  14236. 2
  14237. 2
  14238. 2
  14239. 2
  14240. 2
  14241. 2
  14242. 2
  14243. 2
  14244. 2
  14245. 2
  14246. 2
  14247. 2
  14248. 2
  14249. 2
  14250. 2
  14251. 2
  14252. 2
  14253. 2
  14254. 2
  14255. 2
  14256. 2
  14257. 2
  14258. 2
  14259. 2
  14260. 2
  14261. 2
  14262. 2
  14263. 2
  14264. 2
  14265. 2
  14266. 2
  14267. 2
  14268. 2
  14269. 2
  14270. 2
  14271. 2
  14272. 2
  14273. 2
  14274. 2
  14275. 2
  14276. 2
  14277. 2
  14278. 2
  14279. 2
  14280. 2
  14281. 2
  14282. 2
  14283. 2
  14284. 2
  14285. 2
  14286. 2
  14287. 2
  14288. 2
  14289. 2
  14290. 2
  14291. 2
  14292. 2
  14293. 2
  14294. 2
  14295. 2
  14296. 2
  14297. 2
  14298. 2
  14299. 2
  14300. 2
  14301. 2
  14302. 2
  14303. 2
  14304. 2
  14305. 2
  14306. 2
  14307. 2
  14308. 2
  14309. 2
  14310. 2
  14311. 2
  14312. 2
  14313. 2
  14314. 2
  14315. 2
  14316. 2
  14317. 2
  14318. 2
  14319. 2
  14320. 2
  14321. 2
  14322. 2
  14323. 2
  14324. 2
  14325. 2
  14326. 2
  14327. 2
  14328. 2
  14329. 2
  14330. 2
  14331. 2
  14332. 2
  14333. 2
  14334. 2
  14335. 2
  14336. 2
  14337. 2
  14338. 2
  14339. 2
  14340. 2
  14341. 2
  14342. 2
  14343. 2
  14344. 2
  14345. 2
  14346. 2
  14347. 2
  14348. 2
  14349. 2
  14350. 2
  14351. 2
  14352. 2
  14353. 2
  14354. 2
  14355. 2
  14356. 2
  14357. 2
  14358. 2
  14359. 2
  14360. 2
  14361. 2
  14362. 2
  14363. 2
  14364. 2
  14365. 2
  14366. 2
  14367. 2
  14368. 2
  14369. 2
  14370. 2
  14371. 2
  14372. 2
  14373. 2
  14374. 2
  14375. 2
  14376. 2
  14377. 2
  14378. 2
  14379. 2
  14380. 2
  14381. 2
  14382. 2
  14383. 2
  14384. 2
  14385. 2
  14386. 2
  14387. 2
  14388. 2
  14389. 2
  14390. 2
  14391. 2
  14392. 2
  14393. 2
  14394. 2
  14395. 2
  14396. 2
  14397. 2
  14398. 2
  14399. 2
  14400. 2
  14401. 2
  14402. 2
  14403. 2
  14404. 2
  14405. 2
  14406. 2
  14407. 2
  14408. 2
  14409. 2
  14410. 2
  14411. 2
  14412. 2
  14413. 2
  14414. 2
  14415. 2
  14416. 2
  14417. 2
  14418. 2
  14419. 2
  14420. 2
  14421. 2
  14422. 2
  14423. 2
  14424. 2
  14425. 2
  14426. 2
  14427. 2
  14428. 2
  14429. 2
  14430. 2
  14431. 2
  14432. 2
  14433. 2
  14434. 2
  14435. 2
  14436. 2
  14437. 2
  14438. 2
  14439. 2
  14440. 2
  14441. 2
  14442. 2
  14443. 2
  14444. 2
  14445. 2
  14446. 2
  14447. 2
  14448. 2
  14449. 2
  14450. 2
  14451. 2
  14452. 2
  14453. 2
  14454. 2
  14455. 2
  14456. 2
  14457. 2
  14458. 2
  14459. 2
  14460. 2
  14461. 2
  14462. 2
  14463. 2
  14464. 2
  14465. 2
  14466. 2
  14467. 2
  14468. 2
  14469. 2
  14470. 2
  14471. 2
  14472. 2
  14473. 2
  14474. 2
  14475. 2
  14476. 2
  14477. 2
  14478. 2
  14479. 2
  14480. 2
  14481. 2
  14482. 2
  14483. 2
  14484. 2
  14485. 2
  14486. 2
  14487. 2
  14488. 2
  14489. 2
  14490. 2
  14491. 2
  14492. 2
  14493. 2
  14494. 2
  14495. 2
  14496. 2
  14497. 2
  14498. 2
  14499. 2
  14500. 2
  14501. 2
  14502. 2
  14503. 2
  14504. 2
  14505. 2
  14506. 2
  14507. 2
  14508. 2
  14509. 2
  14510. 2
  14511. 2
  14512. 2
  14513. 2
  14514. 2
  14515. 2
  14516. To compete with the Airbus A320-NEO, the Max had larger engines than previous 737 models. They were designed for greater range and fuel efficiency but came with a tradeoff. Since the 737 sits so low to the ground, Boeing had to change the position of the engines on the wing to give the plane ground clearance and account for the extended length of the fuselage. But by solving an old problem, Boeing created a new one. The new engines were too big to fit in their traditional spot under the wings. To combat the problem, Boeing mounted them forward on the wings. Moving the engine position forward shifted the plane’s center of gravity, which altered the aerodynamics of the aircraft. The position of the new engines pulled the 737 tail down, pushed its nose up, and put it at risk of stalling. (Slow air speed and high nose position are the most common causes of stalls. When an aircraft stalls, it begins to fall because the wings stop creating lift.) Boeing installed extra software to make the updated 737 fly like traditional ones. It was designed to prevent stalls, compensate for the position of the engine on the wing, and force the aircraft’s nose down automatically when the sensors determined the airplane was flying at a dangerous angle. The stall-prevention system (known as MCAS) was poorly designed and implemented. Since it was intended to work in the background, Boeing didn’t brief pilots about the software or train them in simulators. The software didn’t activate when the flaps were down or the autopilot was on.³ And when the MCAS system went haywire, pilots could deactivate it with a switch on the center pedestal of the 737 cockpit. As pilots yoked the airplane upwards, the software automatically pushed the aircraft nose back down. This led to the crash of the two Boeing airplanes.
    2
  14517. 2
  14518. 2
  14519. 2
  14520. 2
  14521. 2
  14522. 2
  14523. 2
  14524. 2
  14525. 2
  14526. 2
  14527. 2
  14528. 2
  14529. 2
  14530. 2
  14531. 2
  14532. 2
  14533. 2
  14534. 2
  14535. 2
  14536. 2
  14537. 2
  14538. 2
  14539. 2
  14540. 2
  14541. 2
  14542. 2
  14543. 2
  14544. 2
  14545. 2
  14546. 2
  14547. 2
  14548. 2
  14549. 2
  14550. 2
  14551. 2
  14552. 2
  14553. 2
  14554. 2
  14555. 2
  14556. 2
  14557. 2
  14558. 2
  14559. 2
  14560. 2
  14561. 2
  14562. 2
  14563. 2
  14564. 2
  14565. 2
  14566. 2
  14567. 2
  14568. 2
  14569. 2
  14570. 2
  14571. 2
  14572. 2
  14573. 2
  14574. 2
  14575. 2
  14576. 2
  14577. 2
  14578. 2
  14579. 2
  14580. 2
  14581. 2
  14582. 2
  14583. 2
  14584. 2
  14585. 2
  14586. 2
  14587. 2
  14588. 2
  14589. 2
  14590. 2
  14591. 2
  14592. 2
  14593. 2
  14594. 2
  14595. 2
  14596. 2
  14597. 2
  14598. 2
  14599. 2
  14600. 2
  14601. 2
  14602. 2
  14603. 2
  14604. 2
  14605. 2
  14606. 2
  14607. 2
  14608. 2
  14609. 2
  14610. 2
  14611. 2
  14612. 2
  14613. 2
  14614. 2
  14615. 2
  14616. 2
  14617. 2
  14618. 2
  14619. 2
  14620. 2
  14621. 2
  14622. 2
  14623. 2
  14624. 2
  14625. 2
  14626. 2
  14627. 2
  14628. 2
  14629. 2
  14630. 2
  14631. 2
  14632. 2
  14633. 2
  14634. 2
  14635. 2
  14636. 2
  14637. 2
  14638. 2
  14639. 2
  14640. 2
  14641. 2
  14642. 2
  14643. 2
  14644. 2
  14645. 2
  14646. 2
  14647. 2
  14648. 2
  14649. 2
  14650. 2
  14651. 2
  14652. 2
  14653. 2
  14654. 2
  14655. 2
  14656. 2
  14657. 2
  14658. 2
  14659. 2
  14660. 2
  14661. 2
  14662. 2
  14663. 2
  14664. 2
  14665. 2
  14666. 2
  14667. 2
  14668. 2
  14669. 2
  14670. 2
  14671. 2
  14672. 2
  14673. 2
  14674. 2
  14675. 2
  14676. 2
  14677. 2
  14678. 2
  14679. 2
  14680. 2
  14681. 2
  14682. 2
  14683. 2
  14684. 2
  14685. 2
  14686. 2
  14687. 2
  14688. 2
  14689. 2
  14690. 2
  14691. 2
  14692. 2
  14693. 2
  14694. 2
  14695. 2
  14696. 2
  14697. 2
  14698. 2
  14699. 2
  14700. 2
  14701. 2
  14702. 2
  14703. 2
  14704. 2
  14705. 2
  14706. 2
  14707. 2
  14708. 2
  14709. 2
  14710. 2
  14711. 2
  14712. 2
  14713. 2
  14714. 2
  14715. 2
  14716. 2
  14717. 2
  14718. 2
  14719. 2
  14720. 2
  14721. 2
  14722. 2
  14723. 2
  14724. 2
  14725. 2
  14726. 2
  14727. 2
  14728. 2
  14729. 2
  14730. 2
  14731. 2
  14732. 2
  14733. 2
  14734. 2
  14735. 2
  14736. 2
  14737. 2
  14738. 2
  14739. 2
  14740. 2
  14741. 2
  14742. 2
  14743. 2
  14744. 2
  14745. 2
  14746. 2
  14747. 2
  14748. 2
  14749. 2
  14750. 2
  14751. 2
  14752. 2
  14753. 2
  14754. 2
  14755. 2
  14756. 2
  14757. 2
  14758. 2
  14759. 2
  14760. 2
  14761. 2
  14762. 2
  14763. 2
  14764. 2
  14765. 2
  14766. 2
  14767. 2
  14768. 2
  14769. 2
  14770. 2
  14771. 2
  14772. 2
  14773. 2
  14774. 2
  14775. 2
  14776. 2
  14777. 2
  14778. 2
  14779. 2
  14780. 2
  14781. 2
  14782. 2
  14783. 2
  14784. 2
  14785. 2
  14786. 2
  14787. 2
  14788. 2
  14789. 2
  14790. 2
  14791. 2
  14792. 2
  14793. 2
  14794. 2
  14795. 2
  14796. 2
  14797. 2
  14798. 2
  14799. 2
  14800. 2
  14801. 2
  14802. 2
  14803. 2
  14804. 2
  14805. 2
  14806. 2
  14807. 2
  14808. 2
  14809. 2
  14810. 2
  14811. 2
  14812. 2
  14813. 2
  14814. 2
  14815. 2
  14816. 2
  14817. 2
  14818. 2
  14819. 2
  14820. 2
  14821. 2
  14822. 2
  14823. 2
  14824. 2
  14825. 2
  14826. 2
  14827. 2
  14828. 2
  14829. 2
  14830. 2
  14831. 2
  14832. 2
  14833. 2
  14834. 2
  14835. 2
  14836. 2
  14837. 2
  14838. 2
  14839. 2
  14840. 2
  14841. 2
  14842. 2
  14843. 2
  14844. 2
  14845. 2
  14846. 2
  14847. 2
  14848. 2
  14849. 2
  14850. 2
  14851. 2
  14852. 2
  14853. 2
  14854. 2
  14855. 2
  14856. 2
  14857. 2
  14858. 2
  14859. 2
  14860. 2
  14861. 2
  14862. 2
  14863. 2
  14864. 2
  14865. 2
  14866. 2
  14867. 2
  14868. 2
  14869. 2
  14870. 2
  14871. 2
  14872. 2
  14873. 2
  14874. 2
  14875. 2
  14876. 2
  14877. 2
  14878. 2
  14879. 2
  14880. 2
  14881. 2
  14882. 2
  14883. 2
  14884. 2
  14885. 2
  14886. 2
  14887. 2
  14888. 2
  14889. 2
  14890. 2
  14891. 2
  14892. 2
  14893. 2
  14894. 2
  14895. 2
  14896. 2
  14897. 2
  14898. 2
  14899. 2
  14900. 2
  14901. 2
  14902. 2
  14903. 2
  14904. 2
  14905. 2
  14906. 2
  14907. 2
  14908. 2
  14909. 2
  14910. 2
  14911. 2
  14912. 2
  14913. 2
  14914. 2
  14915. 2
  14916. 2
  14917. 2
  14918. 2
  14919. 2
  14920. 2
  14921. 2
  14922. 2
  14923. 2
  14924. 2
  14925. 2
  14926. 2
  14927. 2
  14928. 2
  14929. 2
  14930. 2
  14931. 2
  14932. 2
  14933. 2
  14934. 2
  14935. 2
  14936. 2
  14937. 2
  14938. 2
  14939. 2
  14940. 2
  14941. 2
  14942. 2
  14943. 2
  14944. 2
  14945. 2
  14946. 2
  14947. 2
  14948. 2
  14949. 2
  14950. 2
  14951. 2
  14952. 2
  14953. 2
  14954. 2
  14955. 2
  14956. 2
  14957. 2
  14958. 2
  14959. 2
  14960. 2
  14961. 2
  14962. 2
  14963. 2
  14964. 2
  14965. 2
  14966. 2
  14967. 2
  14968. 2
  14969. 2
  14970. 2
  14971. 2
  14972. 2
  14973. 2
  14974. 2
  14975. 2
  14976. 2
  14977. 2
  14978. 2
  14979. 2
  14980. 2
  14981. 2
  14982. 2
  14983. 2
  14984. 2
  14985. 2
  14986. 2
  14987. 2
  14988. 2
  14989. 2
  14990. 2
  14991. 2
  14992. 2
  14993. 2
  14994. 2
  14995. 2
  14996. 2
  14997. 2
  14998. 2
  14999. 2
  15000. 2
  15001. 2
  15002. 2
  15003. 2
  15004. 2
  15005. 2
  15006. 2
  15007. 2
  15008. 2
  15009. 2
  15010. 2
  15011. 2
  15012. 2023-7-3 UN: India sells arms to junta while claiming concern over crisis in Myanmar. Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    2
  15013. 2
  15014. 2
  15015. 2
  15016. 2
  15017. 2
  15018. 2
  15019. 2
  15020. 2
  15021. 2
  15022. 2
  15023. 2
  15024. 2
  15025. 2
  15026. 2
  15027. 2
  15028. 2
  15029. 2
  15030. 2
  15031. 2
  15032. 2
  15033. 2
  15034. 2
  15035. 2
  15036. 2
  15037. 2
  15038. 2
  15039. 2
  15040. 2
  15041. 2
  15042. 2
  15043. 2
  15044. 2
  15045. 2
  15046. 2
  15047. 2
  15048. 2
  15049. 2
  15050. 2
  15051. 2
  15052. 2
  15053. 2
  15054. 2
  15055. 2
  15056. 2
  15057. 2
  15058. 2
  15059. 2
  15060. 2
  15061. 2
  15062. 2
  15063. 2
  15064. 2
  15065. 2
  15066. 2
  15067. 2
  15068. 2
  15069. 2
  15070. 2
  15071. 2
  15072. 2
  15073. 2
  15074. 2
  15075. 2
  15076. 2
  15077. 2
  15078. 2
  15079. 2
  15080. 2
  15081. 2
  15082. 2
  15083. 2
  15084. 2
  15085. 2
  15086. 2
  15087. 2
  15088. 2
  15089. 2
  15090. 2
  15091. 2
  15092. 2
  15093. 2
  15094. 2
  15095. 2
  15096. 2
  15097. 2
  15098. 2
  15099. 2
  15100. 2
  15101. 2
  15102. 2
  15103. 2
  15104. 2
  15105. 2
  15106. 2
  15107. 2
  15108. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  15109. 2
  15110. 2
  15111. 2
  15112. 2
  15113. 2
  15114. 2
  15115. 2
  15116. 2
  15117. 2
  15118. 2
  15119. 2
  15120. 2
  15121. 2
  15122. 2
  15123. 2
  15124. 2
  15125. 2
  15126. 2
  15127. 2
  15128. 2
  15129. 2
  15130. 2
  15131. 2
  15132. 2
  15133. 2
  15134. 2
  15135. 2
  15136. 2
  15137. 2
  15138. 2
  15139. 2
  15140. 2
  15141. 2
  15142. 2
  15143. 2
  15144. 2
  15145. 2
  15146. 2
  15147. 2
  15148. 2
  15149. 2
  15150. 2
  15151. 2
  15152. 2
  15153. 2
  15154. 2
  15155. 2
  15156. 2
  15157. 2
  15158. 2
  15159. 2
  15160. 2
  15161. 2
  15162. 2
  15163. 2
  15164. 2
  15165. 2
  15166. 2
  15167. 2
  15168. 2
  15169. 2
  15170. 2
  15171. 2
  15172. 2
  15173. 2
  15174. 2
  15175. 2
  15176. 2
  15177. 2
  15178. 2
  15179. 2
  15180. 2
  15181. 2
  15182. 2
  15183. 2
  15184. 2
  15185. 2
  15186. 2
  15187. 2
  15188. 2
  15189. 2
  15190. 2
  15191. 2
  15192. 2
  15193. 2
  15194. 2
  15195. 2
  15196. 2
  15197. 2
  15198. 2
  15199. 2
  15200. 2
  15201. 2
  15202. 2
  15203. 2
  15204. 2
  15205. 2
  15206. 2
  15207. 2
  15208. 2
  15209. 2
  15210. 2
  15211. 2
  15212. 2
  15213. 2
  15214. 2
  15215. 2
  15216. 2
  15217. 2
  15218. 2
  15219. 2
  15220. 2
  15221. 2
  15222. 2
  15223. 2
  15224. 2
  15225. 2
  15226. 2
  15227. 2
  15228. 2
  15229. 2
  15230. 2
  15231. 2
  15232. 2
  15233. 2
  15234. 2
  15235. 2
  15236. 2
  15237. 2
  15238. 2
  15239. 2
  15240. 2
  15241. 2
  15242. 2
  15243. 2
  15244. 2
  15245. 2
  15246. 2
  15247. 2
  15248. 2
  15249. 2
  15250. 2
  15251. 2
  15252. 2
  15253. 2
  15254. 2
  15255. 2
  15256. 2
  15257. 2
  15258. 2
  15259. 2
  15260. 2
  15261. 2
  15262. 2
  15263. 2
  15264. 2
  15265. 2
  15266. 2
  15267. 2
  15268. 2
  15269. 2
  15270. 2
  15271. 2
  15272. 2
  15273. 2
  15274. 2
  15275. 2
  15276. 2
  15277. 2
  15278. 2
  15279. 2
  15280. 2
  15281. 2
  15282. 2
  15283. 2
  15284. 2
  15285. 2
  15286. 2
  15287. 2
  15288. 2
  15289. 2
  15290. 2
  15291. 2
  15292. 2
  15293. 2
  15294. 2
  15295. 2
  15296. 2
  15297. 2
  15298. 2
  15299. 2
  15300. 2
  15301. 2
  15302. 2
  15303. 2
  15304. 2
  15305. 2
  15306. 2
  15307. 2
  15308. 2
  15309. 2
  15310. 2
  15311. 2
  15312. 2
  15313. 2
  15314. 2
  15315. 2
  15316. 2
  15317. 2
  15318. 2
  15319. 2
  15320. 2
  15321. 2
  15322. 2
  15323. 2
  15324. 2
  15325. 2
  15326. 2
  15327. 2
  15328. 2
  15329. 2
  15330. 2
  15331. 2
  15332. 2
  15333. 2
  15334. 2
  15335. 2
  15336. 2
  15337. 2
  15338. 2
  15339. 2
  15340. 2
  15341. 2
  15342. 2
  15343. 2
  15344. 2
  15345. 2
  15346. 2
  15347. 2
  15348. 2
  15349. 2
  15350. 2
  15351. 2
  15352. 2
  15353. 2
  15354. 2
  15355. 2
  15356. 2
  15357. 2
  15358. 2
  15359. 2
  15360. 2
  15361. 2
  15362. 2
  15363. 2
  15364. 2
  15365. 2
  15366. 2
  15367. 2
  15368. 2
  15369. 2
  15370. 2
  15371. 2
  15372. 2
  15373. 2
  15374. 2
  15375. 2
  15376. 2
  15377. 2
  15378. 2
  15379. 2
  15380. 2
  15381. 2
  15382. 2
  15383. 2
  15384. 2
  15385. 2
  15386. 2
  15387. 2
  15388. 2
  15389. 2
  15390. 2
  15391. 2
  15392. 2
  15393. 2
  15394. 2
  15395. 2
  15396. 2
  15397. 2
  15398. 2
  15399. 2
  15400. 2
  15401. 2
  15402. 2
  15403. 2
  15404. 2
  15405. 2
  15406. 2
  15407. 2
  15408. 2
  15409. 2
  15410. 2
  15411. 2
  15412. 2
  15413. 2
  15414. 2
  15415. 2
  15416. 2
  15417. 2
  15418. 2
  15419. 2
  15420. 2
  15421. 2
  15422. 2
  15423. 2
  15424. 2
  15425. 2
  15426. 2
  15427. 2
  15428. 2
  15429. 2
  15430. 2
  15431. 2
  15432. 2
  15433. 2
  15434. 2
  15435. 2
  15436. 2
  15437. 2
  15438. 2
  15439. 2
  15440. 2
  15441. 2
  15442. 2
  15443. 2
  15444. 2
  15445. 2
  15446. 2
  15447. 2
  15448. 2
  15449. 2
  15450. 2
  15451. 2
  15452. 2
  15453. 2
  15454. 2
  15455. 2
  15456. 2
  15457. 2
  15458. 2
  15459. 2
  15460. 2
  15461. 2
  15462. 2
  15463. 2
  15464. 2
  15465. 2
  15466. 2
  15467. 2
  15468. 2
  15469. 2
  15470. 2
  15471. 2
  15472. 2
  15473. 2
  15474. 2
  15475. 2
  15476. 2
  15477. 2
  15478. 2
  15479. 2
  15480. 2
  15481. 2
  15482. 2
  15483. 2
  15484. 2
  15485. 2
  15486. 2
  15487. 2
  15488. 2
  15489. 2
  15490. 2
  15491. 2
  15492. 2
  15493. 2
  15494. 2
  15495. 2
  15496. 2
  15497. 2
  15498. 2
  15499. 2
  15500. 2
  15501. 2
  15502. 2
  15503. 2
  15504. 2
  15505. 2
  15506. 2
  15507. 2
  15508. 2
  15509. 2
  15510. 2
  15511. 2
  15512. 2
  15513. 2
  15514. 2
  15515. 2
  15516. 2
  15517. 2
  15518. 2
  15519. 2
  15520. 2
  15521. 2
  15522. 2
  15523. 2
  15524. 2
  15525. 2
  15526. 2
  15527. 2
  15528. 2
  15529. 2
  15530. 2
  15531. 2
  15532. 2
  15533. 2
  15534. 2
  15535. 2
  15536. 2
  15537. 2
  15538. 2
  15539. 2
  15540. 2
  15541. 2
  15542. 2
  15543. 2
  15544. 2
  15545. 2
  15546. 2
  15547. 2
  15548. 2
  15549. 2
  15550. 2
  15551. 2
  15552. 2
  15553. 2
  15554. 2
  15555. 2
  15556. 2
  15557. 2
  15558. 2
  15559. 2
  15560. 2
  15561. 2
  15562. The head of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) says Israel informed the UN that it will no longer approve any aid convoys run by the agency. “This is outrageous [and] makes it intentional to obstruct lifesaving assistance during a man made famine. These restrictions must be lifted”, Philippe Lazzarini wrote in an X post. He warned that the move will speed up the coming of famine in the north of the Gaza Strip, and said that “many more will die of hunger, dehydration”. Famine is likely to occur by May in northern Gaza and could spread across the enclave by July, the world’s hunger watchdog, known as the Integrated Food-Security Phase Classification (IPC), said last week. The IPC said 70 percent of people in parts of northern Gaza were suffering the most severe level of food shortage, more than triple the 20 percent threshold to be considered famine. In all, 1.1 million Palestinians in Gaza, about half the population, were experiencing “catastrophic” shortages of food. The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) says Israel must “urgently reverse” its decision to block the entry of food convoys organised by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) into northern Gaza, where humanitarian needs are most urgent. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wrote in a post on X that this decision will lead to the deaths of more starving Palestinians in the northern part of the enclave. “The levels of hunger are acute. All efforts to deliver food should not only be permitted, but there should be an immediate acceleration of food deliveries,” he said. Sam Rose is the Director of Planning at the agency. He says Israel's decision is a death sentence for Palestinians.
    2
  15563. 2
  15564. 2
  15565. 2
  15566. 2
  15567. 2
  15568. 2
  15569. 2
  15570. 2
  15571. 2
  15572. 2
  15573. 2
  15574. 2
  15575. 2
  15576. 2
  15577. 2
  15578. 2
  15579. 2
  15580. 2
  15581. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  15582. 2
  15583. 2
  15584. 2
  15585. 2
  15586. 2
  15587. 2
  15588. 2
  15589. 2
  15590. 2
  15591. 2
  15592. 2
  15593. 2
  15594. 2
  15595. 2
  15596. 2
  15597. 2
  15598. 2
  15599. 2
  15600. 2
  15601. 2
  15602. 2
  15603. 2
  15604. 2
  15605. 2
  15606. 2
  15607. 2
  15608. 2
  15609. 2
  15610. 2
  15611. 2
  15612. 2
  15613. 2
  15614. 2
  15615. 2
  15616. 2
  15617. 2
  15618. 2
  15619. 2
  15620. 2
  15621. 2
  15622. 2
  15623. 2
  15624. 2
  15625. 2
  15626. 2
  15627. 2
  15628. 2
  15629. 2
  15630. 2
  15631. 2
  15632. 2
  15633. 2
  15634. 2
  15635. 2
  15636. 2
  15637. 2
  15638. 2
  15639. 2
  15640. 2
  15641. 2
  15642. 2
  15643. 2
  15644. 2
  15645. 2
  15646. 2
  15647. 2
  15648. 2
  15649. 2
  15650. 2
  15651. 2
  15652. 2
  15653. 2
  15654. 2
  15655. 2
  15656. 2
  15657. 2
  15658. 2
  15659. 2
  15660. 2
  15661. 2
  15662. 2
  15663. 2
  15664. 2
  15665. 2
  15666. 2
  15667. 2
  15668. 2
  15669. 2
  15670. 2
  15671. 2
  15672. 2
  15673. 2
  15674. 2
  15675. 2
  15676. 2
  15677. 2
  15678. 2
  15679. 2
  15680. 2
  15681. 2
  15682. 2
  15683. 2
  15684. 2
  15685. 2
  15686. 2
  15687. 2
  15688. 2
  15689. 2
  15690. 2
  15691. 2
  15692. 2
  15693. 2
  15694. 2
  15695. 2
  15696. 2
  15697. 2
  15698. 2
  15699. 2
  15700. 2
  15701. 2
  15702. 2
  15703. 2
  15704. 2
  15705. 2
  15706. 2
  15707. 2
  15708. 2
  15709. 2
  15710. 2
  15711. 2
  15712. 2
  15713. 2
  15714. 2
  15715. 2
  15716. 2
  15717. 2
  15718. 2
  15719. 2
  15720. 2
  15721. 2
  15722. 2
  15723. 2
  15724. 2
  15725. 2
  15726. 2
  15727. 2
  15728. 2
  15729. 2
  15730. 2
  15731. 2
  15732. 2
  15733. 2
  15734. 2
  15735. 2
  15736. 2
  15737. 2
  15738. 2
  15739. 2
  15740. 2
  15741. 2
  15742. 2
  15743. 2
  15744. 2
  15745. 2
  15746. 2
  15747. 2
  15748. 2
  15749. 2
  15750. 2
  15751. 2
  15752. 2
  15753. 2
  15754. 2
  15755. 2
  15756. 2
  15757. 2
  15758. 2
  15759. 2
  15760. 2
  15761. 2
  15762. 2
  15763. 2
  15764. 2
  15765. 2
  15766. 2
  15767. 2
  15768. 2
  15769. 2
  15770. 2
  15771. 2
  15772. 2
  15773. 2
  15774. 2
  15775. 2
  15776. 2
  15777. 2
  15778. By @EduardoArtistaDelavega One of the most alarming things about Syria is that most people can't give you a cogent summary of who any member of the opposition is, what they stand for, who their allies are, or why they're fighting. The very mention of the word "Syria" throws people into a myopia that defies all historical or geopolitical context. Indeed, the nucleus of any discussion in The West is simply "Assad Must Go!" without any consideration as to what the alternative is or what regime change would mean for the Syrian people at large. Erdogan, who is still clandestinely trading with Israel, has played an active part in trying to balkanize Syria for well over a decade, yet no one is questioning why militants with links to al-Qaeda are suddenly pouring into Syria from Turkiye immediately after netanyahu threatened Assad for aiding the Lebanese resistance? Western propaganda has told you that solidarity with the Syrian people can only take the form of being adamantly against Assad. This line of thinking suffocates any space for critical thought and inquiry. Even highlighting the well-documented US/Israel support for these rebel groups is immediately misconstrued as an endorsement of the current government. Not only does this poison the discourse, it conveniently services the imperialist agenda to balkanize Syria. Those who claim to be anti-imperialist are now voicing support for the US administered occupation of Syria. Why does the US have untouched military bases in rebel-held provinces? Why is it that the same states who are actively funding/aiding and abetting the genocide in Gaza are also feverishly pro-regime change? Why are so many fighters for the Syrian opposition foreigners? Will there be a resurgence of isis and other extremist groups?
    2
  15779. 2
  15780. 2
  15781. 2
  15782. 2
  15783. 2
  15784. 2
  15785. 2
  15786. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    2
  15787. 2
  15788. 2
  15789. 2
  15790. 2
  15791. 2
  15792. 2
  15793. 2
  15794. 2
  15795. 2
  15796. 2
  15797. 2
  15798. 2
  15799. 2
  15800. 2
  15801. 2
  15802. 2
  15803. 2
  15804. 2
  15805. 2
  15806. 2
  15807. 2
  15808. 2
  15809. 2
  15810. 2
  15811. 2
  15812. 2
  15813. 2
  15814. 2
  15815. 2
  15816. 2
  15817. 2
  15818. 2
  15819. 2
  15820. 2
  15821. 2
  15822. 2
  15823. 2
  15824. 2
  15825. 2
  15826. 2
  15827. 2
  15828. 2
  15829. 2
  15830. 2
  15831. 2
  15832. 2
  15833. 2
  15834. 2
  15835. 2
  15836. 2
  15837. 2
  15838. 2
  15839. 2
  15840. 2
  15841. 2
  15842. 2
  15843. 2
  15844. 2
  15845. 2
  15846. 2
  15847. 2
  15848. 2
  15849. 2
  15850. 2
  15851. 2
  15852. 2
  15853. 2
  15854. 2
  15855. 2
  15856. 2
  15857. 2
  15858. 2
  15859. 2
  15860. 2
  15861. 2
  15862. 2
  15863. 2
  15864. 2
  15865. 2
  15866. 2
  15867. 2
  15868. 2
  15869. 2
  15870. 2
  15871. 2
  15872. 2
  15873. 2
  15874. 2
  15875. 2
  15876. 2
  15877. 2
  15878. 2
  15879. 2
  15880. 2
  15881. By @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  15882. 2
  15883. Repost BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  15884. 2
  15885. 2
  15886. 2
  15887. 2
  15888. 2
  15889. 2
  15890. 2
  15891. 2
  15892. 2
  15893. 2
  15894. 2
  15895. 14-4-2023 India tightens grip on social media platforms New rules that force platforms to "fact-check" content relating to government business are deeply concerning, say digital rights activists The Indian government clearly has a problem with what its critics are saying on Twitter. In line with the worsening situation for media freedom in the country, India frequently clamps down on what the media is able to say on Twitter. In the last half of 2021, India was the country making the highest number of legal demands relating to the accounts of verified journalists and news outlets, some 114 out of a total of 326 for the period, comfortably ahead of Turkey and Russia. A new onslaught on what Indians are saying on Twitter may have opened up last week. On 6 April, an amendment to India’s Information Technology Act came into force which now requires social media platforms to fact-check any post relating to the Indian government’s business with the Press Information Bureau, a “fact-checking” unit that is part of the country’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The threat to social media platforms who do not comply with this is that they would then no longer be protected by the country’s safe harbour regulations under which they are currently not liable for what their users post. The Indian digital liberties organisation Internet Freedom Foundation says it is “deeply concerned” by the amendments. It said in a statement: “Assigning any unit of the government such arbitrary, overbroad powers to determine the authenticity of online content bypasses the principles of natural justice, thus making it an unconstitutional exercise. The notification of these amended rules cement the chilling effect on the fundamental right to speech and expression, particularly on news publishers, journalists, activists, etc.”
    2
  15896. 2
  15897. 2
  15898. 2
  15899. 2
  15900. 2
  15901. 2
  15902. 2
  15903. 2
  15904. 2
  15905. 2
  15906. 2
  15907. 2
  15908. 2
  15909. 2
  15910. 2
  15911. 2
  15912. 2
  15913. 2
  15914. 2
  15915. 2
  15916. 2
  15917. 2
  15918. 2
  15919. 2
  15920. 2
  15921. 2
  15922. 2
  15923. 2
  15924. 2
  15925. 2
  15926. 2
  15927. 2
  15928. 2
  15929. 2
  15930. 2
  15931. 2
  15932. 2
  15933. 2
  15934. 2
  15935. 2
  15936. 2
  15937. 2
  15938. 2
  15939. 2
  15940. 2
  15941. 2
  15942. 2
  15943. 2
  15944. 2
  15945. 2
  15946. 2
  15947. 2
  15948. 2
  15949. 2
  15950. 2
  15951. 2
  15952. 2
  15953. 2
  15954. 2
  15955. 2
  15956. 2
  15957. 2
  15958. 2
  15959. 2
  15960. 2
  15961. 2
  15962. 2
  15963. 2
  15964. 2
  15965. 2
  15966. 2
  15967. 2
  15968. 2
  15969. 2
  15970. 2
  15971. 2
  15972. 2
  15973. 2
  15974. 2
  15975. 2
  15976. 2
  15977. 2
  15978. 2
  15979. 2
  15980. 2
  15981. 2
  15982. 2
  15983. 2
  15984. 2
  15985. 2
  15986. 2
  15987. 2
  15988. 2
  15989. 2
  15990. 2
  15991. 2
  15992. 2
  15993. 2
  15994. 2
  15995. UN : Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    2
  15996. 2
  15997. 2
  15998. 2
  15999. 2
  16000. 2
  16001. 2
  16002. 2
  16003. 2
  16004. 2
  16005. 2
  16006. 2
  16007. 2
  16008. 2
  16009. 2
  16010. 2
  16011. 2
  16012. 2
  16013. 2
  16014. 2
  16015. 2
  16016. 2
  16017. 2
  16018. 2
  16019. 2
  16020. 2
  16021. 2
  16022. 2
  16023. 2
  16024. 2
  16025. 2
  16026. 2
  16027. 2
  16028. 2
  16029. 2
  16030. 2
  16031. 2
  16032. 2
  16033. 2
  16034. 2
  16035. 2
  16036. 2
  16037. 2
  16038. 2
  16039. 2
  16040. 2
  16041. 2
  16042. 2
  16043. 2
  16044. 2
  16045. 2
  16046. 2
  16047. 2
  16048. 2
  16049. 2
  16050. 2
  16051. 2
  16052. 2
  16053. 2
  16054. 2
  16055. 2
  16056. 2
  16057. 2
  16058. 2
  16059. 2
  16060. 2
  16061. 2
  16062. 2
  16063. 2
  16064. 2
  16065. 2
  16066. 2
  16067. 2
  16068. 2
  16069. 2
  16070. 2
  16071. 2
  16072. 2
  16073. 2
  16074. 2
  16075. 2
  16076. 2
  16077. 2
  16078. 2
  16079. 2
  16080. 2
  16081. 2
  16082. 2
  16083. 2
  16084. 2
  16085. 2
  16086. 2
  16087. 2
  16088. 2
  16089. 2
  16090. 2
  16091. 2
  16092. 2
  16093. 2
  16094. 2
  16095. 2
  16096. 2
  16097. 2
  16098. 2
  16099. 2
  16100. 2
  16101. 2
  16102. 2
  16103. 2
  16104. 2
  16105. 2
  16106. 2
  16107. 2
  16108. 2
  16109. 2
  16110. 2
  16111. 2
  16112. 2
  16113. 2
  16114. 2
  16115. 2
  16116. 2
  16117. 2
  16118. 2
  16119.  @hkonhelgesen  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  16120. 2
  16121. 2
  16122. 2
  16123. 2
  16124. 2
  16125. 2
  16126. 2
  16127. 2
  16128. 2
  16129. 2
  16130. 2
  16131. 2
  16132. 2
  16133. 2
  16134. 2
  16135. 2
  16136. 2
  16137. 2
  16138. 2
  16139. 2
  16140. 2
  16141. 2
  16142. 2
  16143. 2
  16144. 2
  16145. 2
  16146. 2
  16147. 2
  16148. 2
  16149. 2
  16150. 2
  16151. 2
  16152. 2
  16153. 2
  16154. 2
  16155. 2
  16156. 2
  16157. 2
  16158. 2
  16159. 2
  16160. 2
  16161. 2
  16162. 2
  16163. 2
  16164. 2
  16165. 2
  16166. 2
  16167. 2
  16168. 2
  16169. 2
  16170. 2
  16171. 2
  16172. 2
  16173. 2
  16174. 2
  16175. 2
  16176. 2
  16177. 2
  16178. 2
  16179. 2
  16180. 2
  16181. 2
  16182. 2
  16183. 2
  16184. 2
  16185. 2
  16186. 2
  16187. 2
  16188. 2
  16189. 2
  16190. 2
  16191. 2
  16192. 2
  16193. 2
  16194. 2
  16195. 2
  16196. 2
  16197. 2
  16198. 2
  16199. 2
  16200. 2
  16201. 2
  16202. 2
  16203. 2
  16204. 2
  16205. 2
  16206. 2
  16207. 2
  16208. 2
  16209. 2
  16210. 2
  16211. 2
  16212. 2
  16213. 2
  16214. 2
  16215. 2
  16216. 2
  16217. 2
  16218. 2
  16219. 2
  16220. 2
  16221. 2
  16222. 2
  16223. 2
  16224. 2
  16225. 2
  16226. 2
  16227. 2
  16228. 2
  16229. 2
  16230. 2
  16231. 2
  16232. 2
  16233. 2
  16234. 2
  16235. 2
  16236. 2
  16237. 2
  16238. 2
  16239. 2
  16240. 2
  16241. 2
  16242. 2
  16243. 2
  16244. 2
  16245. 2
  16246. 2
  16247. 2
  16248. 2
  16249. 2
  16250. 2
  16251. 2
  16252. 2
  16253. 2
  16254. 2
  16255. 2
  16256. 2
  16257. 2
  16258. 2
  16259. 2
  16260. 2
  16261. 2
  16262. 2
  16263. 2
  16264. 2
  16265. 2
  16266. 2
  16267. 2
  16268. 2
  16269. 2
  16270. 2
  16271. 2
  16272. 2
  16273. 2
  16274. 2
  16275. 2
  16276. 2
  16277. 2
  16278. 2
  16279. 2
  16280. 2
  16281. 2
  16282. 2
  16283. 2
  16284. 2
  16285. 2
  16286. 2
  16287. 2
  16288. 2
  16289. 2
  16290. 2
  16291. 2
  16292. 2
  16293. 2
  16294. 2
  16295. 2
  16296. 2
  16297. 2
  16298. 2
  16299. 2
  16300. 2
  16301. 2
  16302. 2
  16303. 2
  16304. 2
  16305. 2
  16306. 2
  16307. 2
  16308. 2
  16309. 2
  16310. 2
  16311. 2
  16312. 2
  16313. 2
  16314. 2
  16315. 2
  16316. 2
  16317. 2
  16318. 2
  16319. 2
  16320. 2
  16321. 2
  16322. 2
  16323. 2
  16324. 2
  16325. 2
  16326. 2
  16327. 2
  16328. 2
  16329. 2
  16330. 2
  16331. 2
  16332. 2
  16333. 2
  16334. 2
  16335. 2
  16336. 2
  16337. 2
  16338. 2
  16339. 2
  16340. 2
  16341. 2
  16342. 2
  16343. 2
  16344. 2
  16345. 2
  16346. 2
  16347. 2
  16348. 2
  16349. 2
  16350. 2
  16351. 2
  16352. 2
  16353. 2
  16354. 2
  16355. 2
  16356. 2
  16357. 2
  16358. 2
  16359. 2
  16360. 2
  16361. 2
  16362. 2
  16363. 2
  16364. 2
  16365. 2
  16366. 2
  16367. 2
  16368. 2
  16369. 2
  16370. 2
  16371. 2
  16372. 2
  16373. 2
  16374. 2
  16375. 2
  16376. 2
  16377. 2
  16378. 2
  16379. 2
  16380. 2
  16381. 2
  16382. 2
  16383. 2
  16384. 2
  16385. 2
  16386. 2
  16387. 2
  16388. 2
  16389. 2
  16390. 2
  16391. 2
  16392. 2
  16393. 2
  16394. 2
  16395. 2
  16396. 2
  16397. 2
  16398. 2
  16399. 2
  16400. 2
  16401. 2
  16402. 2
  16403. 2
  16404. 2
  16405. 2
  16406. 2
  16407. 2
  16408. 2
  16409. 2
  16410. 2
  16411. 2
  16412. 2
  16413. 2
  16414. 2
  16415. 2
  16416. 2
  16417. 2
  16418. 2
  16419. 2
  16420. 2
  16421. 2
  16422. 2
  16423. 2
  16424. 2
  16425. 2
  16426. 2
  16427. 2
  16428. 2
  16429. 2
  16430. 2
  16431. 2
  16432. 2
  16433. 2
  16434. 2
  16435. 2
  16436. 2
  16437. 2
  16438. 2
  16439. 2
  16440. 2
  16441. 2
  16442. 2
  16443. 2
  16444. 2
  16445. 2
  16446. 2
  16447. 2
  16448. 2
  16449. 2
  16450. 2
  16451. 2
  16452. 2
  16453. 2
  16454. 2
  16455. 2
  16456. 2
  16457. 2
  16458. 2
  16459. 2
  16460. 2
  16461. 2
  16462. 2
  16463. 2
  16464. 2
  16465. 2
  16466. 2
  16467. 2
  16468. 2
  16469. 2
  16470. 2
  16471. 2
  16472. 2
  16473. 2
  16474. 2
  16475. 2
  16476. 2
  16477. 2
  16478. 2
  16479. 2
  16480. 2
  16481. 2
  16482. 2
  16483. 2
  16484. 2
  16485. 2
  16486. 2
  16487. 2
  16488. 2
  16489. 2
  16490. 2
  16491. 2
  16492. 2
  16493. 2
  16494. 2
  16495. 2
  16496. 2
  16497. 2
  16498. 2
  16499. 2
  16500. 2
  16501. 2
  16502. 2
  16503. 2
  16504. 2
  16505. 2
  16506. 2
  16507. 2
  16508. 2
  16509. 2
  16510. 2
  16511. 2
  16512. 2
  16513. 2
  16514. 2
  16515. 2
  16516. 2
  16517. 2
  16518. 2
  16519. 2
  16520. 2
  16521. 2
  16522. 2
  16523. 2
  16524. 2
  16525. 2
  16526. 2
  16527. 2
  16528. 2
  16529. 2
  16530. 2
  16531. 2
  16532. 2
  16533. 2
  16534. 2
  16535. 2
  16536. 2
  16537. 2
  16538. 2
  16539. 2
  16540. 2
  16541. 2
  16542. 2
  16543. 2
  16544. 2
  16545. 2
  16546. 2
  16547. 2
  16548. 2
  16549. 2
  16550. 2
  16551. 2
  16552. 2
  16553. 2
  16554. 2
  16555. 2
  16556. 2
  16557. 2
  16558. 2
  16559. 2
  16560. 2
  16561. 2
  16562. 2
  16563. 2
  16564. 2
  16565. 2
  16566. 2
  16567. 2
  16568. 2
  16569. 2
  16570. 2
  16571. 2
  16572. 2
  16573. 2
  16574. 2
  16575. 2
  16576. 2
  16577. 2
  16578. 2
  16579. 2
  16580. 2
  16581. 2
  16582. 2
  16583. 2
  16584. 2
  16585. 2
  16586. 2
  16587. 2
  16588. 2
  16589. 2
  16590. 2
  16591. 2
  16592. 2
  16593. 2
  16594. 2
  16595. 2
  16596. 2
  16597. 2
  16598. 2
  16599. 2
  16600. 2
  16601. 2
  16602. 2
  16603. 2
  16604. 2
  16605. 2
  16606. 2
  16607. 2
  16608. 2
  16609. 2
  16610. 2
  16611. 2
  16612. 2
  16613. 2
  16614. 2
  16615. 2
  16616. 2
  16617. 2
  16618. 2
  16619. 2
  16620. 2
  16621. 2
  16622. 2
  16623. 2
  16624. 2
  16625. 2
  16626. 2
  16627. 2
  16628. 2
  16629. 2
  16630. 2
  16631. 2
  16632. 2
  16633. 2
  16634. 2
  16635. 2
  16636. 2
  16637. 2
  16638. 2
  16639. 2
  16640. 2
  16641. 2
  16642. 2
  16643. 2
  16644. 2
  16645. 2
  16646. 2
  16647. 2
  16648. 2
  16649. 2
  16650. 2
  16651. 2
  16652. 2
  16653. 2
  16654. 2
  16655. 2
  16656. 2
  16657. 2
  16658. 2
  16659. 2
  16660. 2
  16661. 2
  16662. 2
  16663. 2
  16664. 2
  16665. 2
  16666. 2
  16667. 2
  16668. 2
  16669. 2
  16670. 2
  16671. 2
  16672. 2
  16673. 2
  16674. 2
  16675. 2
  16676. 2
  16677. 2
  16678. 2
  16679. 2
  16680. 2
  16681. 2
  16682. 2
  16683. 2
  16684. 2
  16685. 2
  16686. 2
  16687. 2
  16688. 2
  16689. 2
  16690. 2
  16691. 2
  16692. 2
  16693. 2
  16694. 2
  16695. 2
  16696. 2
  16697. 2
  16698. 2
  16699. Transcript on Ren’ai Jiao ‘new model’ is real; Philippines breaches commitment: The Philippine government has been overdrawing on its reputation and national credibility on issues related to the South China Sea, saying one thing and doing another and constantly flip-flopping, Chinese analysts said after Philippine officials accused China of "violating wiretapping law" over a phone conversation in which a Philippine navy official agreed to a "new model" for resupply missions concerning Ren'ai Jiao. A transcript of the supposed recording of a phone call between the Chinese side and the Philippines' Western Command (WESCOM) Commander Vice Admiral Alberto Carlos on January 3 was revealed by media in recent days, in which Carlos agreed to a "new model" for resupply missions concerning Ren'ai Jiao. The transcript which documented the phone conversation between the Chinese side and Carlos on January 3 has been confirmed to be true, the Global Times has learned from a source familiar with the affair on Wednesday. Following the conversation, the Philippine side adhered to the "new model" in the subsequent resupply mission, only delivering essential daily supplies to the grounded warship, and notified the Chinese side in advance. Based on the "new model" arrangement and humanitarian principle, the Chinese side permitted the Philippine resupply operation, said the source. However, thereafter, the Philippine side reneged on its promise. Not only did it fail to notify the Chinese side in advance of its resupply activities, but it also attempted to transport construction materials to the illegally grounded vessel, deliberately causing trouble and maliciously hyping up the situation. The China Coast Guard has firmly restricted the Philippine's illegal resupply activities, according to the source.
    2
  16700. 2
  16701. 2
  16702. 2
  16703. 2
  16704. 2
  16705. 2
  16706. 2
  16707. 2
  16708. 2
  16709. 2
  16710. 2
  16711. 2
  16712. 2
  16713. 2
  16714. 2
  16715. 2
  16716. 2
  16717. 2
  16718. 2
  16719. 2
  16720. 2
  16721. 2
  16722. 2
  16723. 2
  16724. 2
  16725. 2
  16726. 2
  16727. 2
  16728. 2
  16729. 2
  16730. 2
  16731. 2
  16732. 2
  16733. 2
  16734. 2
  16735. 2
  16736. 2
  16737. 2
  16738. 2
  16739. 2
  16740. 2
  16741. 2
  16742. 2
  16743. 2
  16744. 2
  16745. 2
  16746. 2
  16747. 2
  16748. 2
  16749. 2
  16750. 2
  16751. 2
  16752. 2
  16753. 2
  16754. 2
  16755. 2
  16756. 2
  16757. 2
  16758. 2
  16759. 2
  16760. 2
  16761. 2
  16762. 2
  16763. 2
  16764. 2
  16765. 2
  16766. 2
  16767. 2
  16768. 2
  16769. 2
  16770. 2
  16771. 2
  16772. 2
  16773. 2
  16774. 2
  16775. 2
  16776. 2
  16777. 2
  16778. 2
  16779. 2
  16780. 2
  16781. 2
  16782. 2
  16783. 2
  16784. 2
  16785. 2
  16786. 2
  16787. 2
  16788. 2
  16789. 2
  16790. 2
  16791. 2
  16792. 2
  16793. 2
  16794. 2
  16795. 2
  16796. 2
  16797. 2
  16798. 2
  16799. 2
  16800. 2
  16801. 2
  16802. 2
  16803. 2
  16804. 2
  16805. 2
  16806. 2
  16807. 2
  16808. 2
  16809. 2
  16810. 2
  16811. 2
  16812. 2
  16813. 2
  16814. 2
  16815. 2
  16816. 2
  16817. 2
  16818. 2
  16819. 2
  16820. 2
  16821. 2
  16822. 2
  16823. 2
  16824. 2
  16825. 2
  16826. 2
  16827. 2
  16828. 2
  16829. 2
  16830. 2
  16831. 2
  16832. 2
  16833. 2
  16834. 2
  16835. 2
  16836. 2
  16837. 2
  16838. 2
  16839. 2
  16840. 2
  16841. 2
  16842. 2
  16843. 2
  16844. 2
  16845. 2
  16846. 2
  16847. 2
  16848. 2
  16849. 2
  16850. 2
  16851. 2
  16852.  @thelastofthehitachi972  @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  16853. 2
  16854. 2
  16855. 2
  16856. 2
  16857. 2
  16858. 2
  16859. 2
  16860. 2
  16861. 2
  16862. 2
  16863. 2
  16864. 2
  16865. 2
  16866. 2
  16867. 2
  16868. 2
  16869. 2
  16870. 2
  16871. 2
  16872. 2
  16873. 2
  16874. 2
  16875. 2
  16876. 2
  16877. 2
  16878. 2
  16879. 2
  16880. 2
  16881. 2
  16882. 2
  16883. 2
  16884. 2
  16885. 2
  16886. 2
  16887. 2
  16888. 2
  16889. 2
  16890. 2
  16891. 2
  16892. 2
  16893. 2
  16894. 2
  16895. 2
  16896. 2
  16897. 2
  16898. 2
  16899. 2
  16900. 2
  16901. 2
  16902. 2
  16903. 2
  16904. 2
  16905. 2
  16906. 2
  16907. 2
  16908. 2
  16909. 2
  16910. 2
  16911. 2
  16912. 2
  16913. 2
  16914. 2
  16915. 2
  16916. 2
  16917. 2
  16918. 2
  16919. 2
  16920. 2
  16921. 2
  16922. 2
  16923. 2
  16924. 2
  16925. 2
  16926. 2
  16927. 2
  16928. 2
  16929. 2
  16930. 2
  16931. 2
  16932. 2
  16933. 2
  16934. 2
  16935. 2
  16936. 2
  16937. 2
  16938. 2
  16939. 2
  16940. 2
  16941. 2
  16942. 2
  16943. 2
  16944. 2
  16945. 2
  16946. 2
  16947. 2
  16948. 2
  16949. 2
  16950. 2
  16951. 2
  16952. 2
  16953. 2
  16954. 2
  16955. 2
  16956. 2
  16957. 2
  16958. 2
  16959. 2
  16960. 2
  16961. 2
  16962. 2
  16963. 2
  16964. 2
  16965. 2
  16966. 2
  16967. 2
  16968. 2
  16969. 2
  16970. 2
  16971. 2
  16972. 2
  16973. 2
  16974. 2
  16975. 2
  16976. 2
  16977. 2
  16978. 2
  16979. 2
  16980. 2
  16981. 2
  16982. 2
  16983. 2
  16984. 2
  16985. 2
  16986. 2
  16987. 2
  16988. 2
  16989. 2
  16990. 2
  16991. 2
  16992. 2
  16993. 2
  16994. 2
  16995. 2
  16996. 2
  16997. 2
  16998. 2
  16999. 2
  17000. 2
  17001. 2
  17002. 2
  17003. 2
  17004. 2
  17005. 2
  17006. 2
  17007. 2
  17008. 2
  17009. 2
  17010. 2
  17011. 2
  17012. 2
  17013. 2
  17014. 2
  17015. 2
  17016. 2
  17017. 2
  17018. 2
  17019. 2
  17020. 2
  17021. 2
  17022. 2
  17023. 2
  17024. 2
  17025. 2
  17026. 2
  17027. 2
  17028. 2
  17029. 2
  17030. 2
  17031. 2
  17032. 2
  17033. 2
  17034. 2
  17035. 2
  17036. 2
  17037. 2
  17038. 2
  17039. 2
  17040. 2
  17041. 2
  17042. 2
  17043. 2
  17044. 2
  17045. 2
  17046. 2
  17047. 2
  17048. 2
  17049. 2
  17050. 2
  17051. 2
  17052. 2
  17053. 2
  17054. 2
  17055. 2
  17056. 2
  17057. 2
  17058. 2
  17059. 2
  17060. 2
  17061. 2
  17062. 2
  17063. 2
  17064. 2
  17065. 2
  17066. 2
  17067. 2
  17068. 2
  17069. 2
  17070. 2
  17071. 2
  17072. 2
  17073. 2
  17074. 2
  17075. 2
  17076. 2
  17077. 2
  17078. 2
  17079. 2
  17080. 2
  17081. 2
  17082. 2
  17083. 2
  17084. 2
  17085. 2
  17086. 2
  17087. 2
  17088. 2
  17089. 2
  17090. 2
  17091. 2
  17092. 2
  17093. 2
  17094. 2
  17095. 2
  17096. 2
  17097. 2
  17098. 2
  17099. 2
  17100. 2
  17101. 2
  17102. 2
  17103. 2
  17104. 2
  17105. 2
  17106. 2
  17107. 2
  17108. 2
  17109. 2
  17110. 2
  17111. 2
  17112. 2
  17113. 2
  17114. 2
  17115. 2
  17116. 2
  17117. 2
  17118. 2
  17119. 2
  17120. 2
  17121. 2
  17122. 2
  17123. 2
  17124. 2
  17125. 2
  17126. 2
  17127. gordon chang prediction book The Coming Collapse Of China has not aged well after being published in 2001, twenty one years ago. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  17128. 2
  17129. 2
  17130. 2
  17131. 2
  17132. 2
  17133. 2
  17134. 2
  17135. 2
  17136. 2
  17137. 2
  17138. 2
  17139. 2
  17140. 2
  17141. 2
  17142. 2
  17143. 2
  17144. 2
  17145. 2
  17146. 2
  17147. 2
  17148. 2
  17149. 2
  17150. 2
  17151. 2
  17152. 2
  17153. 2
  17154. 2
  17155. 2
  17156. 2
  17157. 2
  17158. 2
  17159. 2
  17160. 2
  17161. 2
  17162. 2
  17163. 2
  17164. 2
  17165. 2
  17166. 2
  17167. 2
  17168. 2
  17169. 2
  17170. 2
  17171. 2
  17172. 2
  17173. 2
  17174. 2
  17175. 2
  17176. 2
  17177. 2
  17178. 2
  17179. 2
  17180. 2
  17181. 2
  17182. 2
  17183. 2
  17184. 2
  17185. 2
  17186. 2
  17187. 2
  17188. 2
  17189. 2
  17190. 2
  17191. 2
  17192. 2
  17193. 2
  17194. 2
  17195. 2
  17196. 2
  17197. 2
  17198. 2
  17199. 2
  17200. 2
  17201. 2
  17202. 2
  17203. 2
  17204. 2
  17205. 2
  17206. 2
  17207. 2
  17208. 2
  17209. 2
  17210. 2
  17211. 2
  17212. 2
  17213. 2
  17214. 2
  17215. 2
  17216. 2
  17217. 2
  17218. 2
  17219. 2
  17220. 2
  17221. 2
  17222. 2
  17223. 2
  17224. 2
  17225. 2
  17226. 2
  17227. 2
  17228. 2
  17229. 2
  17230. 2
  17231. 2
  17232. 2
  17233. 2
  17234. 2
  17235. 2
  17236. 2
  17237. 2
  17238. 2
  17239. 2
  17240. 2
  17241. 2
  17242. 2
  17243. 2
  17244. 2
  17245. 2
  17246. 2
  17247. 2
  17248. 2
  17249. 2
  17250. 2
  17251. 2
  17252. 2
  17253. 2
  17254. 2
  17255. 2
  17256. 2
  17257. 2
  17258. 2
  17259. 2
  17260. 2
  17261. 2
  17262. 2
  17263. 2
  17264. 2
  17265. 2
  17266. 2
  17267. 2
  17268. 2
  17269. 2
  17270. 2
  17271. 2
  17272. 2
  17273. 2
  17274. 2
  17275. 2
  17276. 2
  17277. 2
  17278. 2
  17279. 2
  17280. 2
  17281. 2
  17282. 2
  17283. 2
  17284. 2
  17285. 2
  17286. 2
  17287. 2
  17288. 2
  17289. 2
  17290. 2
  17291. 2
  17292. When Sékou Touré of Guinea decided in 1958 to get out of french colonial empire, and opted for the country independence, the french colonial elite in Paris got so furious, and in a historic act of fury the french administration in Guinea destroyed everything in the country which represented what they called the benefits from french colonization. Three thousand French left the country, taking all their property and destroying anything that which could not be moved: schools, nurseries, public administration buildings were crumbled; cars, books, medicine, research institute instruments, tractors were crushed and sabotaged; horses, cows in the farms were killed, and food in warehouses were burned or poisoned. The purpose of this outrageous act was to send a clear message to all other colonies that the consequences for rejecting France would be very high. Slowly fear spread trough the african elite, and none after the Guinea events ever found the courage to follow the example of Sékou Touré, whose slogan was “We prefer freedom in poverty to opulence in slavery.” Sylvanus Olympio, the first president of the Republic of Togo, a tiny country in west Africa, found a middle ground solution with the French. He didn’t want his country to continue to be a french dominion, therefore he refused to sign the colonisation continuation pact De Gaule proposed, but agree to pay an annual debt to France for the so called benefits Togo got from french colonization. It was the only conditions for the French not to destroy the country before leaving. However, the amount estimated by France was so big that the reimbursement of the so called “colonial debt” was close to 40% of the country budget in 1963. The financial situation of the newly independent Togo was very unstable, so in order to get out the situation, Olympio decided to get out the french colonial money FCFA (the franc for french african colonies), and issue the country own currency. On January 13, 1963, three days after he started printing his country own currency, a squad of illiterate soldiers backed by France killed the first elected president of newly independent Africa. Olympio was killed by an ex French Foreign Legionnaire army sergeant called Etienne Gnassingbe who supposedly received a bounty of $612 from the local French embassy for the hit man job.
    2
  17293. 2
  17294. 2
  17295. 2
  17296. 2
  17297. 2
  17298. 2
  17299. 2
  17300. 2
  17301. 2
  17302. 2
  17303. 2
  17304. 2
  17305. 2
  17306. 2
  17307. 2
  17308. 2
  17309. 2
  17310. 2
  17311. 2
  17312. 2
  17313. 2
  17314. 2
  17315. 2
  17316. 2
  17317. 2
  17318. 2
  17319. 2
  17320. 2
  17321. 2
  17322. 2
  17323. 2
  17324. 2
  17325. 2
  17326. 2
  17327. 2
  17328. 2
  17329. 2
  17330. 2
  17331. 2
  17332. 2
  17333. 2
  17334. 2
  17335. 2
  17336. 2
  17337. 2
  17338. 2
  17339. 2
  17340. 2
  17341. 2
  17342. 2
  17343. 2
  17344. 2
  17345. 2
  17346. 2
  17347. 2
  17348. 2
  17349. 2
  17350. 2
  17351. 2
  17352. 2
  17353. 2
  17354. 2
  17355. 2
  17356. 2
  17357. 2
  17358. 2
  17359. 2
  17360. 2
  17361. 2
  17362. 2
  17363. 2
  17364. 2
  17365. 2
  17366. 2
  17367. 2
  17368. 2
  17369. 2
  17370. 2
  17371. 2
  17372. 2
  17373. 2
  17374. 2
  17375. 2
  17376. 2
  17377. 2
  17378. 2
  17379. 2
  17380. 2
  17381. 2
  17382. 2
  17383. 2
  17384. 2
  17385. 2
  17386. 2
  17387. 2
  17388. 2
  17389. 2
  17390. 2
  17391. 2
  17392. 2
  17393. 2
  17394. 2
  17395. 2
  17396. 2
  17397. 2
  17398. 2
  17399. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  17400. 2
  17401. 2
  17402. 2
  17403. 2
  17404. 2
  17405. 2
  17406. 2
  17407. 2
  17408. 2
  17409. 2
  17410. 2
  17411. 2
  17412. 2
  17413. 2
  17414. 2
  17415. 2
  17416. 2
  17417. 2
  17418. 2
  17419. 2
  17420. 2
  17421. 2
  17422. 2
  17423. 2
  17424. 2
  17425. 2
  17426. 2
  17427. 2
  17428. 2
  17429. 2
  17430. 2
  17431. 2
  17432. 2
  17433. 2
  17434. 2
  17435. 2
  17436. 2
  17437. 2
  17438. 2
  17439. 2
  17440. 2
  17441. 2
  17442. 2
  17443. 2
  17444. 2
  17445. 2
  17446. 2
  17447. 2
  17448. 2
  17449. 2
  17450. 2
  17451. 2
  17452. 2
  17453. 2
  17454. 2
  17455. 2
  17456. 2
  17457. 2
  17458. 2
  17459. 2
  17460. 2
  17461. 2
  17462. 2
  17463. 2
  17464. 2
  17465. 2
  17466. 2
  17467. 2
  17468. 2
  17469. 2
  17470. 2
  17471. 2
  17472. 2
  17473. 2
  17474. 2
  17475. 2
  17476. 2
  17477. 2
  17478. 2
  17479. 2
  17480. 2
  17481. 2
  17482. 2
  17483. 2
  17484. 2
  17485. 2
  17486. 2
  17487. 2
  17488. 2
  17489. 2
  17490. 2
  17491. 2
  17492. 2
  17493. 2
  17494. 2
  17495. 2
  17496. 2
  17497. 2
  17498. 2
  17499. 2
  17500. 2
  17501. 2
  17502. 2
  17503. 2
  17504. 2
  17505. 2
  17506. 2
  17507. 2
  17508. 2
  17509. 2
  17510. 2
  17511. 2
  17512. 2
  17513. 2
  17514. 2
  17515. 2
  17516. 2
  17517. 2
  17518. 2
  17519. 2
  17520. 2
  17521. 2
  17522. 2
  17523. 2
  17524. 2
  17525. 2
  17526. 2
  17527. 2
  17528. 2
  17529. 2
  17530. 2
  17531. 2
  17532. 2
  17533. 2
  17534. 2
  17535. 2
  17536. 2
  17537. 2
  17538. 2
  17539. 2
  17540. 2
  17541. 2
  17542. 2
  17543. 2
  17544. 2
  17545. 2
  17546. 2
  17547. 2
  17548. 2
  17549. 2
  17550. 2
  17551. 2
  17552. 2
  17553. 2
  17554. 2
  17555. 2
  17556. 2
  17557. 2
  17558. 2
  17559. 2
  17560. 2
  17561. 2
  17562. 2
  17563. 2
  17564. 2
  17565. 2
  17566. 2
  17567. 2
  17568. 2
  17569. 2
  17570. 2
  17571. 2
  17572. 2
  17573. 2
  17574. 2
  17575. 2
  17576. 2
  17577. 2
  17578. 2
  17579. 2
  17580. 2
  17581. 2
  17582. 2
  17583. 2
  17584. 2
  17585. 2
  17586. 2
  17587. 2
  17588. 2
  17589. 2
  17590. 2
  17591. 2
  17592. 2
  17593. 2
  17594. 2
  17595. 2
  17596. 2
  17597. 2
  17598. 2
  17599. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  17600. 2
  17601. 2
  17602. 2
  17603. 2
  17604. 2
  17605. 2
  17606. 2
  17607. 2
  17608. 2
  17609. 2
  17610. 2
  17611. 2
  17612. 2
  17613. 2
  17614. 2
  17615. 2
  17616. 2
  17617. 2
  17618. 2
  17619. 2
  17620. 2
  17621. 2
  17622. 2
  17623. 2
  17624. 2
  17625. 2
  17626. 2
  17627. 2
  17628. 2
  17629. 2
  17630. 2
  17631. 2
  17632. 2
  17633. 2
  17634. 2
  17635. 2
  17636. 2
  17637. 2
  17638. 2
  17639. American taxpayer real enemy is the "military industrial complex" , NOT China. Ordinary Americans Are Being Forced to Subsidize the Military-Industrial Complex This year, the average American paid $1,087 in taxes just for Pentagon contractors alone. Imagine the kind of society we could construct with just a fraction of the resources we devote to war. More than 60 years after Eisenhower identified the problem and gave it a name, the military-industrial complex continues to use its unprecedented influence to corrupt budget and policy processes, starve funding for non-military solutions to security problems, and ensure that war is the ever more likely “solution” to this country’s problems. The question is: What can be done to reduce its power over our lives, our livelihoods, and ultimately, the future of the planet? Countering the modern-day military-industrial complex would mean dislodging each of the major pillars undergirding its power and influence. That would involve campaign-finance reform; curbing the revolving door between the weapons industry and government; shedding more light on its funding of political campaigns, think tanks, and Hollywood; and prioritizing investments in the jobs of the future in green technology and public health instead of piling up ever more weapons systems. Most important of all, perhaps, a broad-based public education campaign is needed to promote more realistic views of the challenge posed by China and to counter the current climate of fear that serves the interests of the Pentagon and the giant weapons contractors at the expense of the safety and security of the rest of us.
    2
  17640. 2
  17641. 2
  17642. 2
  17643. 2
  17644. 2
  17645. 2
  17646. 2
  17647. 2
  17648. 2
  17649. 2
  17650. 2
  17651. 2
  17652. 2
  17653. 2
  17654. 2
  17655. 2
  17656. 2
  17657. 2
  17658. 2
  17659. 2
  17660. 2
  17661. 2
  17662. 2
  17663. 2
  17664. 2
  17665. 2
  17666. 2
  17667. 2
  17668. 2
  17669. 2
  17670. 2
  17671. 2
  17672. 2
  17673. 2
  17674. 2
  17675. 2
  17676. 2
  17677. 2
  17678. 2
  17679. 2
  17680. 2
  17681. 2
  17682. 2
  17683. 2
  17684. 2
  17685. 2
  17686. 2
  17687. 2
  17688. 2
  17689. 2
  17690. 2
  17691. 2
  17692. 2
  17693. 2
  17694. 2
  17695. 2
  17696. 2
  17697. 2
  17698. 2
  17699. 2
  17700. 2
  17701. 2
  17702. 2
  17703. 2
  17704. 2
  17705. 2
  17706. 2
  17707. 2
  17708. 2
  17709. 2
  17710. 2
  17711. 2
  17712. 2
  17713. 2
  17714. 2
  17715. 2
  17716. 2
  17717. 2
  17718. 2
  17719. 2
  17720. 2
  17721. 2
  17722. 2
  17723. 2
  17724. 2
  17725. 2
  17726. 2
  17727. 2
  17728. 2
  17729. 2
  17730. 2
  17731. 2
  17732. 2
  17733. 2
  17734. 2
  17735. 2
  17736. 2
  17737. 2
  17738. 2
  17739. 2
  17740. 2
  17741. 2
  17742. 2
  17743. 2
  17744. 2
  17745. 2
  17746. 2
  17747. 2
  17748. 2
  17749. 2
  17750. 2
  17751. 2
  17752. 2
  17753. 2
  17754. 2
  17755. 2
  17756. 2
  17757. 2
  17758. 2
  17759. 2
  17760. 2
  17761. 2
  17762. 2
  17763. 2
  17764. 2
  17765. 2
  17766. 2
  17767. 2
  17768. 2
  17769. 2
  17770. 2
  17771. 2
  17772. 2
  17773. 2
  17774. 2
  17775. 2
  17776. 2
  17777. 2
  17778. 2
  17779. 2
  17780. 2
  17781. 2
  17782. 2
  17783. 2
  17784. 2
  17785. 2
  17786. 2
  17787. 2
  17788. 2
  17789. 2
  17790. 2
  17791. 2
  17792. 2
  17793. 2
  17794. 2
  17795. 2
  17796. 2
  17797. 2
  17798. 2
  17799. 2
  17800. 2
  17801. 2
  17802. 2
  17803. 2
  17804. 2
  17805. 2
  17806. 2
  17807. 2
  17808. 2
  17809. 2
  17810. 2
  17811. 2
  17812. 2
  17813. 2
  17814. 2
  17815. 2
  17816. 2
  17817. 2
  17818. 2
  17819. 2
  17820. 2
  17821. 2
  17822. 2
  17823. 2
  17824. 2
  17825. 2
  17826. 2
  17827. 2
  17828. 2
  17829. 2
  17830. 2
  17831. 2
  17832. 2
  17833. 2
  17834. 2
  17835. 2
  17836. 2
  17837. 2
  17838. 2
  17839. 2
  17840. 2
  17841. 2
  17842. 2
  17843. 2
  17844. 2
  17845. 2
  17846. 2
  17847. 2
  17848. 2
  17849. 2
  17850. 2
  17851. 2
  17852. 2
  17853. 2
  17854. 2
  17855. 2
  17856. 2
  17857. 2
  17858. 2
  17859. 2
  17860. 2
  17861. 2
  17862. 2
  17863. 2
  17864. 2
  17865. 2
  17866. 2
  17867. 2
  17868. 2
  17869. 2
  17870. 2
  17871. 2
  17872. 2
  17873. 2
  17874. 2
  17875. 2
  17876. 2
  17877. 2
  17878. 2
  17879. 2
  17880. 2
  17881. 2
  17882. 2
  17883. 2
  17884. 2
  17885. 2
  17886. 2
  17887. 2
  17888. 2
  17889. 2
  17890. 2
  17891. 2
  17892. 2
  17893. 2
  17894. 2
  17895. 2
  17896. 2
  17897. 2
  17898. 2
  17899. 2
  17900. 2
  17901. 2
  17902. 2
  17903. 2
  17904. 2
  17905. 2
  17906. 2
  17907. 2
  17908. 2
  17909. 2
  17910. 2
  17911. 2
  17912. 2
  17913. 2
  17914. 2
  17915. 2
  17916. 2
  17917. 2
  17918. 2
  17919. 2
  17920. 2
  17921. 2
  17922. 2
  17923. 2
  17924. 2
  17925. 2
  17926. 2
  17927. 2
  17928. 2
  17929. 2
  17930. 2
  17931. 2
  17932. 2
  17933. 2
  17934. 2
  17935. 2
  17936. 2
  17937. 2
  17938. 2
  17939. 2
  17940. 2
  17941. 2
  17942. 2
  17943. 2
  17944. 2
  17945. 2
  17946. 2
  17947. 2
  17948. 2
  17949. 2
  17950. 2
  17951. 2
  17952. 2
  17953. 2
  17954. 2
  17955. 2
  17956. 2
  17957. 2
  17958. 2
  17959. 2
  17960. 2
  17961. 2
  17962. 2
  17963. 2
  17964. 2
  17965. 2
  17966. 2
  17967. 2
  17968. 2
  17969. 2
  17970. 2
  17971. 2
  17972. 2
  17973. 2
  17974. 2
  17975. 2
  17976. 2
  17977. 2
  17978. 2
  17979. 2
  17980. 2
  17981. 2
  17982. 2
  17983. 2
  17984. 2
  17985. 2
  17986. 2
  17987. 2
  17988. 2
  17989. 2
  17990. 2
  17991. 2
  17992. 2
  17993. 2
  17994. 2
  17995. 2
  17996. 2
  17997. 2
  17998. 2
  17999. 2
  18000. 2
  18001. 2
  18002. 2
  18003. 2
  18004. 2
  18005. 2
  18006. 2
  18007. 2
  18008. 2
  18009. 2
  18010. 2
  18011. 2
  18012. 2
  18013. 2
  18014. 2
  18015. 2
  18016. 2
  18017. 2
  18018. 2
  18019. 2
  18020. 2
  18021. 2
  18022. 2
  18023. 2
  18024. 2
  18025. 2
  18026. 2
  18027. 2
  18028. 2
  18029. 2
  18030. 2
  18031. 2
  18032. 2
  18033. 2
  18034. 2
  18035. 2
  18036. 2
  18037. 2
  18038. 2
  18039. 2
  18040. 2
  18041. 2
  18042. 2
  18043. 2
  18044. 2
  18045. 2
  18046. 2
  18047. 2
  18048. 2
  18049. 2
  18050. 2
  18051. 2
  18052. 2
  18053. 2
  18054. 2
  18055. 2
  18056. 2
  18057. 2
  18058. 2
  18059. 2
  18060. 2
  18061. 2
  18062. 2
  18063. 2
  18064. 2
  18065. 2
  18066. 2
  18067. 2
  18068. 2
  18069. 2
  18070. 2
  18071. 2
  18072. 2
  18073. 2
  18074. 2
  18075. 2
  18076. 2
  18077. 2
  18078. 2
  18079. 2
  18080. 2
  18081. 2
  18082. 2
  18083. 2
  18084. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  18085. 2
  18086. 2
  18087. 2
  18088. 2
  18089. 2
  18090. 2
  18091. 2
  18092. 2
  18093. 2
  18094. 2
  18095. 2
  18096. 2
  18097. 2
  18098. 2
  18099. 2
  18100. 2
  18101. 2
  18102. 2
  18103. 2
  18104. 2
  18105. 2
  18106. 2
  18107. 2
  18108. 2
  18109. 2
  18110. 2
  18111. 2
  18112. 2
  18113. 2
  18114. 2
  18115. 2
  18116. 2
  18117. 2
  18118. 2
  18119. 2
  18120. 2
  18121. 2
  18122. 2
  18123. 2
  18124. 2
  18125. 2
  18126. 2
  18127. 2
  18128. 2
  18129. 2
  18130. 2
  18131. 2
  18132. 2
  18133. 2
  18134. 2
  18135. 2
  18136. 2
  18137. 2
  18138. 2
  18139. 2
  18140. 2
  18141. 2
  18142. 2
  18143. 2
  18144. 2
  18145. 2
  18146. 2
  18147. 2
  18148. 2
  18149. 2
  18150. 2
  18151. 2
  18152. 2
  18153. 2
  18154. 2
  18155. 2
  18156. 2
  18157. 2
  18158. 2
  18159. 2
  18160. 2
  18161. 2
  18162. 2
  18163. 2
  18164. 2
  18165. 2
  18166. 2
  18167. 2
  18168. 2
  18169. 2
  18170. 2
  18171. 2
  18172. 2
  18173. 2
  18174. 2
  18175. 2
  18176. 2
  18177. 2
  18178. 2
  18179. 2
  18180. 2
  18181. 2
  18182. 2
  18183. 2
  18184. 2
  18185. 2
  18186. 2
  18187. 2
  18188. 2
  18189. 2
  18190. 2
  18191. 2
  18192. 2
  18193. 2
  18194. 2
  18195. 2
  18196. 2
  18197. 2
  18198. 2
  18199. 2
  18200. 2
  18201. 2
  18202. 2
  18203. 2
  18204. 2
  18205. 2
  18206. 2
  18207. 2
  18208. 2
  18209. 2
  18210. 2
  18211. 2
  18212. 2
  18213. 2
  18214. 2
  18215. 2
  18216. 2
  18217. 2
  18218. 2
  18219. 2
  18220. 2
  18221. 2
  18222. 2
  18223. 2
  18224. 2
  18225. 2
  18226. 2
  18227. 2
  18228. 2
  18229. 2
  18230. 2
  18231. 2
  18232. 2
  18233. 2
  18234. 2
  18235. 2
  18236. 2
  18237. 2
  18238. Thirty+ years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to SOVIET . The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    2
  18239. 2
  18240. 2
  18241. 2
  18242. 2
  18243. 2
  18244. 2
  18245. 2
  18246. 2
  18247. 2
  18248. 2
  18249. 2
  18250. 2
  18251. 2
  18252. 2
  18253. 2
  18254. 2
  18255. 2
  18256. 2
  18257. 2
  18258. 2
  18259. 2
  18260. 2
  18261. 2
  18262. 2
  18263. 2
  18264. 2
  18265. 2
  18266. 2
  18267. 2
  18268. 2
  18269. 2
  18270. 2
  18271. 2
  18272. 2
  18273. 2
  18274. 2
  18275. 2
  18276. 2
  18277. 2
  18278. 2
  18279. 2
  18280. 2
  18281. 2
  18282. 2
  18283. 2
  18284. 2
  18285. 2
  18286. 2
  18287. 2
  18288. 2
  18289. 2
  18290. 2
  18291. 2
  18292. 2
  18293. 2
  18294. 2
  18295. 2
  18296. 2
  18297. 2
  18298. June 21, 2023 President Biden has declared “the battle between democracy and autocracy” to be the defining struggle of his time. But when he rolls out the red carpet on the South Lawn of the White House for Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India on Thursday morning, Mr. Biden will effectively call a temporary truce. In granting Mr. Modi a coveted state visit, complete with a star-studded gala dinner, Mr. Biden will shower attention on a leader presiding over democratic backsliding in the world’s most populous nation. Mr. Modi’s government has cracked down on dissent and hounded opponents in a way that has raised fears of an authoritarian turn not seen since India’s slip into dictatorship in the 1970s. Yet Mr. Biden has concluded, much as his predecessors did, that he needs India despite concerns over human rights just as he believes he needs Saudi Arabia, the Philippines and other countries that are either outright autocracies or do not fit into the category of ideal democracies. At a time of confrontation with Russia and an uneasy standoff with China, Mr. Biden is being forced to accept the flaws of America’s friends. Two and a half years into his administration, the democracy-versus-autocracy framework has, therefore, become something of a geopolitical straitjacket for Mr. Biden, one that conveys little of the subtleties his foreign policy actually envisions yet virtually guarantees criticism every time he shakes hands with a counterpart who does not pass the George Washington test. Even some of his top advisers privately view the construct as too black-and-white in a world of grays. “Any time a president dresses up his foreign policy in the language of values, any concession to geopolitical reality inevitably elicits cries of hypocrisy,” said Hal Brands, a professor of global affairs at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. “The reality, of course, is that every U.S. president — including the ones most devoted to democracy and human rights — realized that there were some relationships that were just too strategically important to hold hostage to concerns about democratic values.” The dynamic, which has played out repeatedly, has become a wearying topic for some top administration officials. The democracy slogan, they said, never fully captured a more textured strategy that goes well beyond dividing the world into two opposing camps. It was more about recognizing the growing global drift away from freedom and the threats posed by more aggressive powers like Russia and China.
    2
  18299. 2
  18300. 2
  18301. 2
  18302. 2
  18303. 2
  18304. 2
  18305. 2
  18306. 2
  18307. 2
  18308. 2
  18309. 2
  18310. 2
  18311. 2
  18312. 2
  18313. 2
  18314. 2
  18315. 2
  18316. 2
  18317. 2
  18318. 2
  18319. 2
  18320. 2
  18321. 2
  18322. 2
  18323. 2
  18324. 2
  18325. 2
  18326. 2
  18327. 2
  18328. 2
  18329. 2
  18330. 2
  18331. 2
  18332. 2
  18333. 2
  18334. 2
  18335. 2
  18336. 2
  18337. 2
  18338. 2
  18339. 2
  18340. 2
  18341. 2
  18342. 2
  18343. 2
  18344. 2
  18345. 2
  18346. 2
  18347. 2
  18348. 2
  18349. 2
  18350. 2
  18351. 2
  18352. 2
  18353. 2
  18354. 2
  18355. 2
  18356. 2
  18357. 2
  18358. 2
  18359. 2
  18360. 2
  18361. 2
  18362. 2
  18363. 2
  18364. 2
  18365. 2
  18366. 2
  18367. 2
  18368. 2
  18369. 2
  18370. 2
  18371. 2
  18372. 2
  18373. 2
  18374. 2
  18375. 2
  18376. 2
  18377. 2
  18378. 2
  18379. 2
  18380. 2
  18381. 2
  18382. 2
  18383. 2
  18384. 2
  18385. 2
  18386. 2
  18387. 2
  18388. 2
  18389. 2
  18390. 2
  18391. 2
  18392. 2
  18393. 2
  18394. 2
  18395. 2
  18396. 2
  18397. 2
  18398. 2
  18399. 2
  18400. 2
  18401. 2
  18402. 2
  18403. 2
  18404. 2
  18405. 2
  18406. 2
  18407. 2
  18408. 2
  18409. 2
  18410. 2
  18411. 2
  18412. 2
  18413. 2
  18414. 2
  18415. 2
  18416. 2
  18417. 2
  18418. 2
  18419. 2
  18420. 2
  18421. 2
  18422. 2
  18423. 2
  18424. 2
  18425. 2
  18426. 2
  18427. 2
  18428. 2
  18429. 2
  18430. 2
  18431. 2
  18432. 2
  18433. 2
  18434. 2
  18435. 2
  18436. 2
  18437. 2
  18438. 2
  18439. 2
  18440. 2
  18441. 2
  18442. 2
  18443. 2
  18444. 2
  18445. 2
  18446. 2
  18447. 2
  18448. 2
  18449. 2
  18450. 2
  18451. 2
  18452. 2
  18453. 2
  18454. 2
  18455. 2
  18456. 2
  18457. 2
  18458. 2
  18459. 2
  18460. 2
  18461. 2
  18462. 2
  18463. 2
  18464. 2
  18465. 2
  18466. 2
  18467. 2
  18468. 2
  18469. 2
  18470. 2
  18471. 2
  18472. 2
  18473. 2
  18474. 2
  18475. 2
  18476. 2
  18477. 2
  18478. 2
  18479. 2
  18480. 2
  18481. 2
  18482. 2
  18483. 2
  18484. 2
  18485. 2
  18486. 2
  18487. 2
  18488. 2
  18489. 2
  18490. 2
  18491. 2
  18492. 2
  18493. 2
  18494. 2
  18495. 2
  18496. 2
  18497. 2
  18498. 2
  18499. 2
  18500. 2
  18501. 2
  18502. 2
  18503. 2
  18504. 2
  18505. 2
  18506. 2
  18507. 2
  18508. 2
  18509. 2
  18510. 2
  18511. 2
  18512. 2
  18513. 2
  18514. 2
  18515. 2
  18516. 2
  18517. 2
  18518. 2
  18519. 2
  18520. 2
  18521. 2
  18522. 2
  18523. 2
  18524. 2
  18525. 2
  18526. 2
  18527. 2
  18528. 2
  18529. 2
  18530. 2
  18531. 2
  18532. 2
  18533. 2
  18534. 2
  18535. 2
  18536. 2
  18537. 2
  18538. 2
  18539. 2
  18540. 2
  18541. 2
  18542. 2
  18543. 2
  18544. 2
  18545. 2
  18546. 2
  18547. 2
  18548. 2
  18549. 2
  18550. 2
  18551. 2
  18552. 2
  18553. 2
  18554. 2
  18555. 2
  18556. 2
  18557. 2
  18558. 2
  18559. 2
  18560. 2
  18561. 2
  18562. 2
  18563. 2
  18564. 2
  18565. 2
  18566. 2
  18567. 2
  18568. 2
  18569. 2
  18570. 2
  18571. 2
  18572. 2
  18573. 2
  18574. 2
  18575. 2
  18576. 2
  18577. 2
  18578. 2
  18579. 2
  18580. 2
  18581. 2
  18582. 2
  18583. 2
  18584. 2
  18585. 2
  18586. 2
  18587. 2
  18588. 2
  18589. 2
  18590. 2
  18591. 2
  18592. 2
  18593. 2
  18594. 2
  18595. 2
  18596. 2
  18597. 2
  18598. 2
  18599. 2
  18600. 2
  18601. 2
  18602. 2
  18603. 2
  18604. 2
  18605. 2
  18606. 2
  18607. 2
  18608. 2
  18609. 2
  18610. 2
  18611. 2
  18612. 2
  18613. 2
  18614. 2
  18615. 2
  18616. 2
  18617. 2
  18618. 2
  18619. 2
  18620. 2
  18621. 2
  18622. 2
  18623. 2
  18624. 2
  18625. 2
  18626. 2
  18627. 2
  18628. 2
  18629. 2
  18630. 2
  18631. 2
  18632. 2
  18633. 2
  18634. 2
  18635. 2
  18636. 2
  18637. 2
  18638. 2
  18639. 2
  18640. 2
  18641. 2
  18642. 2
  18643. 2
  18644. 2
  18645. 2
  18646. 2
  18647. 2
  18648. 2
  18649. 2
  18650. Tigger Hanson: I was born in Taiwan and would like to share with you about the change of Taiwan in the last 15 years: During 2008 and 2016, people in Taiwan and China have been very friendly. The tourist industry and the trade benefitted Taiwan tremendously. Both sides shared a agreement (i.e., The 1992 Consensus) that people from both sides were Chinese even though they have different systems and they made the “One China” interpretations in their own ways (OCI). However, there is always a group of people in Taiwan refusing to admit that their ancestors were Chinese and they chose whatever ways to undermine the eventual unification of the China and Taiwan. In 2016, this group or Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the election by spreading the hatred of China and again in 2020 by exploiting the fear of Hong Kong's riot. The elected president tore up The 1992 Consensus and started cutting all ties with China including changing the official Chinese history books for students. After Trump was elected president, he accepted the congratulation phone call from Taiwan's president, which breaks the US-China tradition since 1979. For president Trump, Taiwan is the best dagger he can use to attack China. He increased the weapon sales to Taiwan along with the trade wars and tech wars against China. After the outbreak of COVID-19, Trump grew desperate and blamed China on spreading the virus as the main strategy of his re-election. He sent the high level officials from US to Taiwan to provoke China. For example, they cut off the mask supply to China in January 2020 and they refuse to bring the Taiwanese in Wuhan back to the island. They spread lies that WHO failed to heed warning from DPP and demanded the resignation of Tedros. They also require that anyone from China would have to be quarantined for 14 days even when the virus in Wuhan had been under control. The Taiwan president kept calling WuHan Virus to enrage her base just like Trump until the end of his presidency. And, DPP made no effort rejecting Trump's request to move TSMC's most advanced production to Arizona and ban semiconductor sales to Huawei. In case you don't know, TSMC is considered the silicon shield of Taiwan since it is a national treasure that China would not want to destroy. It is hard to blame the people in China that they felt betrayed since DPP used the huge trade surplus $150 Billion) with China to buy weapons from USA. In 2022, Pelosi as the 2nd person in the US presidential line of succession, provoked China again by visiting Taiwan. Washington's goal is to steal TSMC and Ukraine-ize Taiwan. And, China Hawks in Washington and Think Tanks would like Taiwanese to fight to the last person if the war breaks out. Taiwan's ruling party, DPP, is happy to play the anti-China card to hang on to its power by spreading lies to fool Taiwanese. For example, DPP, in late 2020, shut down a major TV station (CTI News equivalent to Fox or CNN in the USA) which supported the opposing party. And, the justice department is fully controlled by DPP. Taiwan is no longer a democratic country as US government and media are trying to paint such picture to fool American people and the world. The good news is that Taiwanese started to realize that USA is preparing to dump Taiwan as Trump/Biden forced TSMC to transfer their most advanced semi-conductor manufacturing technology to USA. Therefore, if the war breaks out, USA can afford sitting on the sideline. The war game simulation further revealed that Congress had no intention sending US troops to fight PLA. Let us pray that the Taiwanese people would wake up and throw out the DPP regime in the 2024 election. Then, Taiwan and the whole world will be much safer.
    2
  18651. 2
  18652. 2
  18653.  @Shiela-v6k  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  18654. 2
  18655. 2
  18656. 2
  18657. 2
  18658. 2
  18659. 2
  18660. 2
  18661. 2
  18662. 2
  18663. 2
  18664. 2
  18665. 2
  18666. 2
  18667. 2
  18668. 2
  18669. 2
  18670. 2
  18671. 2
  18672. 2
  18673. 2
  18674. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  18675. 2
  18676. 2
  18677. 2
  18678. 2
  18679. 2
  18680. 2
  18681. 2
  18682. 2
  18683. 2
  18684. 2
  18685. 2
  18686. 2
  18687. 2
  18688. 2
  18689. 2
  18690. 2
  18691. 2
  18692. 2
  18693. 2
  18694. 2
  18695. 2
  18696. 2
  18697. 2
  18698. 2
  18699. 2
  18700. 2
  18701. 2
  18702. 2
  18703. 2
  18704. 2
  18705. 2
  18706. 2
  18707. 2
  18708. 2
  18709. 2
  18710. 2
  18711. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    2
  18712. 2
  18713. 2
  18714. 2
  18715. 2
  18716. 2
  18717. 2
  18718. 2
  18719. 2
  18720. 2
  18721. 2
  18722. 2
  18723. 2
  18724. 2
  18725. 2
  18726. 2
  18727. 2
  18728. 2
  18729. 2
  18730. 2
  18731. 2
  18732. 2
  18733. 2
  18734. 2
  18735. 2
  18736. 2
  18737. 2
  18738. 2
  18739. 2
  18740. 2
  18741. 2
  18742. 2
  18743. 2
  18744. 2
  18745. 2
  18746. 2
  18747. 2
  18748. 2
  18749. 2
  18750. 2
  18751. 2
  18752. 2
  18753. 2
  18754. 2
  18755. 2
  18756. 2
  18757. 2
  18758. 2
  18759. 2
  18760. 2
  18761. 2
  18762. 2
  18763. 2
  18764. 2
  18765. 2
  18766. 2
  18767. 2
  18768. 2
  18769. 2
  18770. 2
  18771. 2
  18772. 2
  18773. 2
  18774. 2
  18775. 2
  18776. 2
  18777. 2
  18778. 2
  18779. 2
  18780. 2
  18781. 2
  18782. 2
  18783. 2
  18784. 2
  18785. 2
  18786. 2
  18787. 2
  18788. 2
  18789. 2
  18790. 2
  18791. 2
  18792. The head of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) says Israel informed the UN that it will no longer approve any aid convoys run by the agency. “This is outrageous [and] makes it intentional to obstruct lifesaving assistance during a man made famine. These restrictions must be lifted”, Philippe Lazzarini wrote in an X post. He warned that the move will speed up the coming of famine in the north of the Gaza Strip, and said that “many more will die of hunger, dehydration”. Famine is likely to occur by May in northern Gaza and could spread across the enclave by July, the world’s hunger watchdog, known as the Integrated Food-Security Phase Classification (IPC), said last week. The IPC said 70 percent of people in parts of northern Gaza were suffering the most severe level of food shortage, more than triple the 20 percent threshold to be considered famine. In all, 1.1 million Palestinians in Gaza, about half the population, were experiencing “catastrophic” shortages of food. The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) says Israel must “urgently reverse” its decision to block the entry of food convoys organised by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) into northern Gaza, where humanitarian needs are most urgent. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wrote in a post on X that this decision will lead to the deaths of more starving Palestinians in the northern part of the enclave. “The levels of hunger are acute. All efforts to deliver food should not only be permitted, but there should be an immediate acceleration of food deliveries,” he said. Sam Rose is the Director of Planning at the agency. He says Israel's decision is a death sentence for Palestinians.
    2
  18793. 2
  18794. 2
  18795. 2
  18796. 2
  18797. 2
  18798. 2
  18799. 2
  18800. 2
  18801. 2
  18802. 2
  18803. 2
  18804. 2
  18805. 2
  18806. 2
  18807. 2
  18808. 2
  18809. 2
  18810. 2
  18811. 2
  18812. 2
  18813. 2
  18814. 2
  18815. 2
  18816. 2
  18817. 2
  18818. 2
  18819. 2
  18820. 2
  18821. 2
  18822. 2
  18823. 2
  18824. 2
  18825. 2
  18826. 2
  18827. 2
  18828. 2
  18829. 2
  18830. 2
  18831. 2
  18832. 2
  18833. 2
  18834. 2
  18835. 2
  18836. 2
  18837. 2
  18838. 2
  18839. 2
  18840. 2
  18841. 2
  18842. 2
  18843. 2
  18844. 2
  18845. 2
  18846. 2
  18847. 2
  18848. 2
  18849. 2
  18850. 2
  18851. 2
  18852. 2
  18853. 2
  18854. 2
  18855. 2
  18856. 2
  18857. 2
  18858. 2
  18859. 2
  18860. 2
  18861. 2
  18862. 2
  18863. 2
  18864. 2
  18865. 2
  18866. 2
  18867. 2
  18868. 2
  18869. 2
  18870. 2
  18871. 2
  18872. 2
  18873. 2
  18874. 2
  18875. 2
  18876. 2
  18877. 2
  18878. 2
  18879. 2
  18880. 2
  18881. 2
  18882. 2
  18883. 2
  18884. 2
  18885. 2
  18886. 2
  18887. 2
  18888. 2
  18889. 2
  18890. 2
  18891. 2
  18892. 2
  18893. 2
  18894. 2
  18895. 2
  18896. 2
  18897. 2
  18898. 2
  18899. 2
  18900. 2
  18901. 2
  18902. 2
  18903. 2
  18904. 2
  18905. 2
  18906. 2
  18907. 2
  18908. 2
  18909. 2
  18910. 2
  18911. 2
  18912. 2
  18913. 2
  18914. 2
  18915. 2
  18916. 2
  18917. 2
  18918. 2
  18919. 2
  18920. 2
  18921. 2
  18922. 2
  18923. 2
  18924. 2
  18925. 2
  18926. 2
  18927. 2
  18928. 2
  18929. 2
  18930. 2
  18931. 2
  18932. 2
  18933. 2
  18934. 2
  18935. 2
  18936. 2
  18937. 2
  18938. 2
  18939. 2
  18940. 2
  18941. 2
  18942. 2
  18943. 2
  18944. 2
  18945. 2
  18946. 2
  18947. 2
  18948. 2
  18949. 2
  18950. 2
  18951. 2
  18952. 2
  18953. 2
  18954. 2
  18955. 2
  18956. 2
  18957. 2
  18958. 2
  18959. 2
  18960. 2
  18961. 2
  18962. 2
  18963. 2
  18964. 2
  18965. 2
  18966. 2
  18967. 2
  18968. 2
  18969. 2
  18970. 2
  18971. 2
  18972. 2
  18973. 2
  18974. 2
  18975. 2
  18976. 2
  18977. 2
  18978. 2
  18979. 2
  18980. 2
  18981. 2
  18982. 2
  18983. 2
  18984. 2
  18985. 2
  18986. 2
  18987. 2
  18988. 2
  18989. 2
  18990. 2
  18991. 2
  18992. 2
  18993. 2
  18994. 2
  18995. 2
  18996. 2
  18997. 2
  18998. 2
  18999. 2
  19000. 2
  19001. 2
  19002. 2
  19003. 2
  19004. 2
  19005. 2
  19006. 2
  19007. 2
  19008. 2
  19009. 2
  19010. 2
  19011. 2
  19012. 2
  19013. 2
  19014. 2
  19015. 2
  19016. 2
  19017. 2
  19018. 2
  19019. 2
  19020. 2
  19021. 2
  19022. 2
  19023. 2
  19024. 2
  19025. 2
  19026. 2
  19027. 2
  19028. 2
  19029. 2
  19030. 2
  19031. 2
  19032. 2
  19033. 2
  19034. 2
  19035. 2
  19036. 2
  19037. 2
  19038. 2
  19039. 2
  19040. 2
  19041. 2
  19042. 2
  19043. 2
  19044. 2
  19045. 2
  19046. 2
  19047. 2
  19048. 2
  19049. 2
  19050. 2
  19051. 2
  19052. 2
  19053. 2
  19054. 2
  19055. 2
  19056. 2
  19057. 2
  19058. 2
  19059. 2
  19060. 2
  19061. 2
  19062. 2
  19063. 2
  19064. 2
  19065. 2
  19066. 2
  19067. 2
  19068. 2
  19069. 2
  19070. 2
  19071. 2
  19072. 2
  19073. 2
  19074. 2
  19075. 2
  19076. 2
  19077. 2
  19078. 2
  19079. 2
  19080. 2
  19081. 2
  19082. 2
  19083. 2
  19084. 2
  19085. 2
  19086. 2
  19087. 2
  19088. 2
  19089. 2
  19090. 2
  19091. 2
  19092. 2
  19093. 2
  19094. 2
  19095. 2
  19096. 2
  19097. 2
  19098. 2
  19099. 2
  19100. 2
  19101. 2
  19102. 2
  19103. 2
  19104. 2
  19105. 2
  19106. 2
  19107. 2
  19108. 2
  19109. 2
  19110. 2
  19111. 2
  19112. 2
  19113. 2
  19114. 2
  19115. 2
  19116. 2
  19117. 2
  19118. 2
  19119. 2
  19120. 2
  19121. 2
  19122. 2
  19123. 2
  19124. 2
  19125. 2
  19126. 2
  19127. 2
  19128. 2
  19129. 2
  19130. 2
  19131. 2
  19132. 2
  19133. 2
  19134. 2
  19135. 2
  19136. 2
  19137. 2
  19138. 2
  19139. 2
  19140. 2
  19141. 2
  19142. 2
  19143. 2
  19144. 2
  19145. 2
  19146. 2
  19147. 2
  19148. 2
  19149. 2
  19150. 2
  19151. 2
  19152. 2
  19153. 2
  19154. 2
  19155. 2
  19156. 2
  19157. 2
  19158. 2
  19159. 2
  19160. 2
  19161. 2
  19162. 2
  19163. 2
  19164. 2
  19165. 2
  19166. 2
  19167. 2
  19168. 2
  19169. 2
  19170. 2
  19171. 2
  19172. 2
  19173. 2
  19174. 2
  19175. 2
  19176. 2
  19177. 2
  19178. 2
  19179. 2
  19180. 2
  19181. 2
  19182. 2
  19183. 2
  19184. 2
  19185. 2
  19186. 2
  19187. 2
  19188. 2
  19189. 2
  19190. 2
  19191. 2
  19192. 2
  19193. 2
  19194. 2
  19195. 2
  19196. 2
  19197. 2
  19198. 2
  19199. 2
  19200. 2
  19201. 2
  19202. 2
  19203. 2
  19204. 2
  19205. 2
  19206. 2
  19207. 2
  19208. 2
  19209. 2
  19210. 2
  19211. 2
  19212. 2
  19213. 2
  19214. 2
  19215. 2
  19216. 2
  19217. 2
  19218. 2
  19219. 2
  19220. 2
  19221. 2
  19222. 2
  19223. 2
  19224. 2
  19225. 2
  19226. 2
  19227. 2
  19228. 2
  19229. 2
  19230. 2
  19231. 2
  19232. 2
  19233. 2
  19234. 2
  19235. 2
  19236. 2
  19237. 2
  19238. 2
  19239. 2
  19240. 2
  19241. 2
  19242. 2
  19243. 2
  19244. 2
  19245. 2
  19246. 2
  19247. 2
  19248. 2
  19249. 2
  19250. 2
  19251. 2
  19252. 2
  19253. 2
  19254. 2
  19255. 2
  19256. 2
  19257. 2
  19258. 2
  19259. 2
  19260. 2
  19261. 2
  19262. 2
  19263. 2
  19264. 2
  19265. 2
  19266. 2
  19267. 2
  19268. 2
  19269. 2
  19270. 2
  19271. 2
  19272. 2
  19273. 2
  19274. 2
  19275. 2
  19276. 2
  19277. 2
  19278. 2
  19279. 2
  19280. 2
  19281. 2
  19282. 2
  19283. 2
  19284. 2
  19285. 2
  19286. 2
  19287. 2
  19288. 2
  19289. 2
  19290. 2
  19291. 2
  19292. 2
  19293. 2
  19294. 2
  19295. 2
  19296. 2
  19297. 2
  19298. 2
  19299. 2
  19300. 2
  19301. 2
  19302. 2
  19303. 2
  19304. 2
  19305. 2
  19306. 2
  19307. 2
  19308. 2
  19309. 2
  19310. 2
  19311. 2
  19312. 2
  19313. 2
  19314. 2
  19315. 2
  19316. 2
  19317. 2
  19318. 2
  19319. 2
  19320. 2
  19321. 2
  19322. 2
  19323. 2
  19324. 2
  19325. 2
  19326. 2
  19327. 2
  19328. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    2
  19329. 2
  19330. 2
  19331. 2
  19332. 2
  19333. 2
  19334. 2
  19335. 2
  19336. 2
  19337. 2
  19338. 2
  19339. 2
  19340. 2
  19341. 2
  19342. 2
  19343. 2
  19344. 2
  19345. 2
  19346. 2
  19347. 2
  19348. 2
  19349. 2
  19350. 2
  19351. 2
  19352. 2
  19353. 2
  19354. 2
  19355. 2
  19356. 2
  19357. 2
  19358. 2
  19359. 2
  19360. 2
  19361. 2
  19362. 2
  19363. 2
  19364. 2
  19365. 2
  19366. 2
  19367. 2
  19368. 2
  19369. 2
  19370. 2
  19371. 2
  19372. 2
  19373. 2
  19374. 2
  19375. 2
  19376. 2
  19377. 2
  19378. 2
  19379. 2
  19380. 2
  19381. 2
  19382. 2
  19383. 2
  19384. 2
  19385. 2
  19386. 2
  19387. 2
  19388. 2
  19389. 2
  19390. 2
  19391. 2
  19392. 2
  19393. 2
  19394. 2
  19395. 2
  19396. 2
  19397. 2
  19398. 2
  19399. 2
  19400. 2
  19401. 2
  19402. 2
  19403. 2
  19404. 2
  19405. 2
  19406. 2
  19407. 2
  19408. 2
  19409. 2
  19410. 2
  19411. 2
  19412. 2
  19413. 2
  19414. 2
  19415. 2
  19416. 2
  19417. 2
  19418. 2
  19419. 2
  19420. 2
  19421. 2
  19422. 2
  19423. 2
  19424. 2
  19425. 2
  19426. 2
  19427. 2
  19428. 2
  19429. 2
  19430. 2
  19431. 2
  19432. 2
  19433. 2
  19434. 2
  19435. 2
  19436. 2
  19437. 2
  19438. 2
  19439. 2
  19440. 2
  19441. 2
  19442. 2
  19443. 2
  19444. 2
  19445. 2
  19446. 2
  19447. 2
  19448. 2
  19449. 2
  19450. 2
  19451. 2
  19452. 2
  19453. 2
  19454. 2
  19455. 2
  19456. 2
  19457. 2
  19458. 2
  19459. 2
  19460. 2
  19461. 2
  19462. 2
  19463. 2
  19464. 2
  19465. 2
  19466. 2
  19467. 2
  19468. 2
  19469. 2
  19470. 2
  19471. 2
  19472. 2
  19473. 2
  19474. 2
  19475. 2
  19476. 2
  19477. 2
  19478. 2
  19479. 2
  19480. 2
  19481. 2
  19482. 2
  19483. 2
  19484. 2
  19485. 2
  19486. 2
  19487. 2
  19488. 2
  19489. 2
  19490. 2
  19491. 2
  19492. 2
  19493. 2
  19494. 2
  19495. 2
  19496. 2
  19497. ​ From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    2
  19498. 2
  19499. 2
  19500. 2
  19501. 2
  19502. 2
  19503. 2
  19504. 2
  19505. 2
  19506. 2
  19507. 2
  19508. 2
  19509. 2
  19510. 2
  19511. 2
  19512. 2
  19513. 2
  19514. 2
  19515. 2
  19516. 2
  19517. 2
  19518. 2
  19519. 2
  19520. 2
  19521. 2
  19522. 2
  19523. 2
  19524. 2
  19525. 2
  19526. 2
  19527. 2
  19528. 2
  19529. 2
  19530. 2
  19531. 2
  19532. 2
  19533. 2
  19534. 2
  19535. 2
  19536. 2
  19537. 2
  19538. 2
  19539. 2
  19540. 2
  19541. 2
  19542. 2
  19543. 2
  19544. 2
  19545. 2
  19546. 2
  19547. 2
  19548. 2
  19549. 2
  19550. 2
  19551. 2
  19552. 2
  19553. 2
  19554. 2
  19555. 2
  19556. 2
  19557. 2
  19558. 2
  19559. 2
  19560. 2
  19561. 2
  19562. 2
  19563. 2
  19564. 2
  19565. 2
  19566. 2
  19567. 2
  19568. 2
  19569. 2
  19570. 2
  19571. 2
  19572. 2
  19573. 2
  19574. 2
  19575. 2
  19576. 2
  19577. 2
  19578. 2
  19579. 2
  19580. 2
  19581. 2
  19582. 2
  19583. 2
  19584. 2
  19585. 2
  19586. 2
  19587. 2
  19588. 2
  19589. 2
  19590. 2
  19591. 2
  19592. 2
  19593. 2
  19594. 2
  19595. 2
  19596. 2
  19597. 2
  19598. 2
  19599. 2
  19600. 2
  19601. 2
  19602. 2
  19603. 2
  19604. 2
  19605. 2
  19606. 2
  19607. 2
  19608. 2
  19609. 2
  19610. 2
  19611. 2
  19612. 2
  19613. 2
  19614. 2
  19615. 2
  19616. 2
  19617. 2
  19618. 2
  19619. 2
  19620. 2
  19621. 2
  19622. 2
  19623. 2
  19624. 2
  19625. 2
  19626. 2
  19627. 2
  19628. 2
  19629. 2
  19630. 2
  19631. 2
  19632. 2
  19633. 2
  19634. 2
  19635. 2
  19636. 2
  19637. 2
  19638. 2
  19639. 2
  19640. 2
  19641. 2
  19642. 2
  19643. 2
  19644. 2
  19645. 2
  19646. 2
  19647. 2
  19648. 2
  19649. 2
  19650. 2
  19651. 2
  19652. 2
  19653. 2
  19654. 2
  19655. 2
  19656. 2
  19657. 2
  19658. 2
  19659. 2
  19660. 2
  19661. 2
  19662. 2
  19663. 2
  19664. 2
  19665. 2
  19666. 2
  19667. 2
  19668. 2
  19669. 2
  19670. 2
  19671. 2
  19672. 2
  19673. 2
  19674. 2
  19675. 2
  19676. 2
  19677. 2
  19678. 2
  19679. 2
  19680. 2
  19681. 2
  19682. 2
  19683. 2
  19684. 2
  19685. 2
  19686. 2
  19687. 2
  19688. 2
  19689. 2
  19690. 2
  19691. 2
  19692. 2
  19693. 2
  19694. 2
  19695. 2
  19696. 2
  19697. 2
  19698. 2
  19699. 2
  19700. 2
  19701. 2
  19702. 2
  19703. 2
  19704. 2
  19705. 2
  19706. 2
  19707. 2
  19708. 2
  19709. 2
  19710. 2
  19711. 2
  19712. 2
  19713. 2
  19714. 2
  19715. 2
  19716. 2
  19717. 2
  19718. 2
  19719. 2
  19720. 2
  19721. 2
  19722. 2
  19723. 2
  19724. 2
  19725. 2
  19726. 2
  19727. 2
  19728. 2
  19729. 2
  19730. 2
  19731. 2
  19732. 2
  19733. 2
  19734. 2
  19735. 2
  19736. 2
  19737. 2
  19738. 2
  19739. 2
  19740. 2
  19741. 2
  19742. 2
  19743. 2
  19744. 2
  19745. 2
  19746. 2
  19747. 2
  19748. 2
  19749. 2
  19750. 2
  19751. 2
  19752. 2
  19753. 2
  19754. 2
  19755. 2
  19756. 2
  19757. 2
  19758. 2
  19759. 2
  19760. 2
  19761. 2
  19762. 2
  19763. 2
  19764. 2
  19765. 2
  19766. 2
  19767. 2
  19768. 2
  19769. 2
  19770. 2
  19771. 2
  19772. 2
  19773. 2
  19774. 2
  19775. 2
  19776. 2
  19777. 2
  19778. 2
  19779. 2
  19780. 2
  19781. 2
  19782. 2
  19783. 2
  19784. 2
  19785. 2
  19786. 2
  19787. 2
  19788. 2
  19789. 2
  19790. 2
  19791. 2
  19792. 2
  19793. 2
  19794. 2
  19795. 2
  19796. 2
  19797. 2
  19798. 2
  19799. 2
  19800. 2
  19801. 2
  19802. 2
  19803. 2
  19804. 2
  19805. 2
  19806. 2
  19807. 2
  19808. 2
  19809. 2
  19810. 2
  19811. 2
  19812. 2
  19813. 2
  19814. 2
  19815. 2
  19816. 2
  19817. 2
  19818. 2
  19819. 2
  19820. 2
  19821. 2
  19822. 2
  19823. 2
  19824. 2
  19825. 2
  19826. 2
  19827. 2
  19828. 2
  19829. 2
  19830. 2
  19831. 2
  19832. 2
  19833. 2
  19834. 2
  19835. 2
  19836. 2
  19837. 2
  19838. 2
  19839. 2
  19840. 2
  19841. 2
  19842. 2
  19843. 2
  19844. 2
  19845. 2
  19846. 2
  19847. 2
  19848. 2
  19849. 2
  19850. 2
  19851. 2
  19852. 2
  19853. 2
  19854. 2
  19855. 2
  19856. 2
  19857. 2
  19858. 2
  19859. 2
  19860. 2
  19861. 2
  19862. 2
  19863. 2
  19864. 2
  19865. 2
  19866. 2
  19867. 2
  19868. 2
  19869. 2
  19870. 2
  19871. 2
  19872. 2
  19873. 2
  19874. 2
  19875. 2
  19876. 2
  19877. 2
  19878. 2
  19879. 2
  19880. 2
  19881. 2
  19882. 2
  19883. 2
  19884. 2
  19885. 2
  19886. 2
  19887. 2
  19888. 2
  19889. 2
  19890. 2
  19891. 2
  19892. 2
  19893. 2
  19894. 2
  19895. 2
  19896. 2
  19897. 2
  19898. 2
  19899. 2
  19900. 2
  19901. 2
  19902. 2
  19903. 2
  19904. 2
  19905. 2
  19906. 2
  19907. 2
  19908. 2
  19909. 2
  19910. 2
  19911. 2
  19912. 2
  19913. 2
  19914. 2
  19915. 2
  19916. 2
  19917. 2
  19918. 2
  19919. 2
  19920. 2
  19921. 2
  19922. 2
  19923. 2
  19924. 2
  19925. 2
  19926. 2
  19927. 2
  19928. 2
  19929. 2
  19930. 2
  19931. 2
  19932. 2
  19933. 2
  19934. 2
  19935. 2
  19936. 2
  19937. 2
  19938. 2
  19939. 2
  19940. 2
  19941. 2
  19942. 2
  19943. 2
  19944. 2
  19945. 2
  19946. 2
  19947. 2
  19948. 2
  19949. 2
  19950. 2
  19951. 2
  19952. 2
  19953. 2
  19954. 2
  19955. 2
  19956. 2
  19957. 2
  19958. 1
  19959. 1
  19960. 1
  19961. 1
  19962. 1
  19963. 1
  19964. 1
  19965. 1
  19966. 1
  19967. 1
  19968. 1
  19969. 1
  19970. 1
  19971. 1
  19972. 1
  19973. 1
  19974. 1
  19975. 1
  19976. 1
  19977. 1
  19978. 1
  19979. 1
  19980. 1
  19981. 1
  19982. 1
  19983. 1
  19984. 1
  19985. 1
  19986. 1
  19987. 1
  19988. 1
  19989. 1
  19990. 1
  19991. 1
  19992. 1
  19993. 1
  19994. 1
  19995. 1
  19996. 1
  19997. 1
  19998. 1
  19999. 1
  20000. 1
  20001. 1
  20002. 1
  20003. 1
  20004. 1
  20005. 1
  20006. 1
  20007. 1
  20008. 1
  20009. 1
  20010. 1
  20011. 1
  20012. 1
  20013. 1
  20014. 1
  20015. 1
  20016. 1
  20017. 1
  20018. 1
  20019. 1
  20020. 1
  20021. 1
  20022. 1
  20023. 1
  20024. 1
  20025. 1
  20026. 1
  20027. 1
  20028. 1
  20029. 1
  20030. 1
  20031. 1
  20032. 1
  20033. 1
  20034. 1
  20035. 1
  20036. 1
  20037. 1
  20038. 1
  20039. 1
  20040. 1
  20041. 1
  20042. 1
  20043. 1
  20044. 1
  20045. 1
  20046. 1
  20047. 1
  20048. 1
  20049. 1
  20050. 1
  20051. 1
  20052. 1
  20053. 1
  20054. 1
  20055. 1
  20056. 1
  20057. 1
  20058. 1
  20059. 1
  20060. 1
  20061. 1
  20062. 1
  20063. 1
  20064. 1
  20065. 1
  20066. 1
  20067. 1
  20068. 1
  20069. 1
  20070. 1
  20071. 1
  20072. 1
  20073. 1
  20074. 1
  20075. 1
  20076. 1
  20077. 1
  20078. 1
  20079. 1
  20080. 1
  20081. 1
  20082. 1
  20083. 1
  20084. 1
  20085. 1
  20086. 1
  20087.  @NorCalMoDo  YES , to have more click.. 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg
    1
  20088. 1
  20089. 1
  20090. 1
  20091. 1
  20092. 1
  20093. 1
  20094. 1
  20095. 1
  20096. 1
  20097. 1
  20098. 1
  20099. 1
  20100. 1
  20101. 1
  20102. 1
  20103. 1
  20104. 1
  20105. 1
  20106. 1
  20107. 1
  20108. 1
  20109. 1
  20110. 1
  20111. 1
  20112. 1
  20113. 1
  20114. 1
  20115. 1
  20116. 1
  20117. 1
  20118. 1
  20119. 1
  20120. 1
  20121. 1
  20122. 1
  20123. 1
  20124. 1
  20125. 1
  20126. 1
  20127. 1
  20128. 1
  20129. 1
  20130. 1
  20131. 1
  20132. 1
  20133. 1
  20134. 1
  20135. 1
  20136. 1
  20137. 1
  20138. 1
  20139. 1
  20140. 1
  20141. 1
  20142. 1
  20143. 1
  20144. 1
  20145. 1
  20146.  @ZX235w3  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    1
  20147. 1
  20148. 1
  20149. 1
  20150. 1
  20151. 1
  20152. 1
  20153. 1
  20154. 1
  20155. 1
  20156. 1
  20157. 1
  20158. 1
  20159. 1
  20160. 1
  20161. 1
  20162. 1
  20163. 1
  20164. 1
  20165. 1
  20166. 1
  20167. 1
  20168. 1
  20169. 1
  20170. 1
  20171. 1
  20172. 1
  20173. 1
  20174. 1
  20175. 1
  20176. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  20177. 1
  20178. 1
  20179. 1
  20180. 1
  20181. 1
  20182. 1
  20183. 1
  20184. 1
  20185. 1
  20186. 1
  20187. 1
  20188. 1
  20189. 1
  20190. 1
  20191. 1
  20192. 1
  20193. 1
  20194. 1
  20195. 1
  20196. 1
  20197. 1
  20198. 1
  20199. 1
  20200. 1
  20201. 1
  20202. 1
  20203. 1
  20204. 1
  20205. 1
  20206. 1
  20207. 1
  20208. 1
  20209. 1
  20210. 1
  20211. 1
  20212. 1
  20213. 1
  20214. 1
  20215. 1
  20216. 1
  20217. 1
  20218. 1
  20219. 1
  20220. 1
  20221. 1
  20222. 1
  20223. 1
  20224. 1
  20225. 1
  20226. 1
  20227. 1
  20228. 1
  20229. 1
  20230. 1
  20231. 1
  20232. 1
  20233. 1
  20234. 1
  20235. 1
  20236. 1
  20237. 1
  20238. 1
  20239. 1
  20240. 1
  20241. 1
  20242. US' predicament in seeking lunar soil samples from China a self-inflicted problem. NASA Administrator Bill Nelson stated that NASA and Chinese officials are engaged in talks to let American scientists analyze the samples, expressing that the talks will end "positively." However, the report also reveals that some US officials are hesitant about a potential agreement thinking it could weaken the US posture of toughness toward China. This highlights the distorted mind-set underlying the desire for US involvement in studying the Chinese samples while not giving up its zero-sum approach in its relationship with China. NASA has been eagerly eyeing the lunar soil samples brought back by Chang'e-5 for quite some time. Since October of last year, when China announced that the Chang'e-5 lunar samples would soon be open to international applications, NASA has shown great interest in the samples. Reports have even revealed that an internal NASA email stated the application for access was necessary because of the "unique value" of the Chinese samples, which had been "made available recently to the international scientific community for research purposes." However, a US domestic law known as the Wolf Amendment has significantly hindered a range of China-US space collaborations, including joint research on lunar soil. The Wolf Amendment prohibits the use of government funding by NASA, the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, or the National Space Council for any collaboration, hosting, or bilateral coordination with China or Chinese-owned companies without certification from the FBI. This strict, bigoted ban has become a self-imposed constraint for the US in the area of space cooperation with China.
    1
  20243. 1
  20244. 1
  20245. 1
  20246. 1
  20247. 1
  20248. 1
  20249. 1
  20250. 1
  20251. 1
  20252. 1
  20253. 1
  20254. 1
  20255. 1
  20256. 1
  20257. 1
  20258. 1
  20259. 1
  20260. 1
  20261. 1
  20262. 1
  20263. 1
  20264. 1
  20265. 1
  20266. 1
  20267. 1
  20268. 1
  20269. 1
  20270. 1
  20271. 1
  20272. 1
  20273. 1
  20274. 1
  20275. 1
  20276. 1
  20277. 1
  20278. 1
  20279. 1
  20280. 1
  20281. 1
  20282. 1
  20283. 1
  20284. 1
  20285. 1
  20286. 1
  20287. 1
  20288. 1
  20289. 1
  20290. 1
  20291. 1
  20292. 1
  20293. 1
  20294. 1
  20295. 1
  20296. 1
  20297. 1
  20298. 1
  20299. 1
  20300. 1
  20301. 1
  20302. 1
  20303. 1
  20304. 1
  20305. 1
  20306. 1
  20307. 1
  20308. The Victims of Agent Orange the U.S. Has Never Acknowledged America has never taken responsibility for spraying the herbicide over Laos during the Vietnam War. But generations of ethnic minorities have endured the consequences. The main focus of the War Legacies Project is to document the long-term effects of the defoliant known as Agent Orange and provide humanitarian aid to its victims. Named for the colored stripe painted on its barrels, Agent Orange — best known for its widespread use by the U.S. military to clear vegetation during the Vietnam War — is notorious for being laced with a chemical contaminant called 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-dioxin, or TCDD, regarded as one of the most toxic substances ever created. The use of the herbicide in the neutral nation of Laos by the United States — secretly, illegally and in large amounts — remains one of the last untold stories of the American war in Southeast Asia. Decades later, even in official military records, the spraying of Laos is mentioned only in passing. When the Air Force in 1982 finally released its partially redacted official history of the defoliation campaign, Operation Ranch Hand, the three pages on Laos attracted almost no attention, other than a statement from Gen. William Westmoreland, a former commander of U.S. forces in Vietnam, that he knew nothing about it — although it was he who ordered it in the first place. Laos remained a forgotten footnote to a lost war. To those who followed the conflict’s aftermath intimately, this was hardly surprising. Only in the last two decades has the United States finally acknowledged and taken responsibility for the legacy of Agent Orange in Vietnam, committing hundreds of millions of dollars to aiding the victims and cleaning up the worst-contaminated hot spots there.
    1
  20309. 1
  20310. 1
  20311. 1
  20312. 1
  20313. 1
  20314. 1
  20315. 1
  20316. 1
  20317. 1
  20318. 1
  20319. 1
  20320. 1
  20321. 1
  20322. 1
  20323. 1
  20324. 1
  20325. 1
  20326. 1
  20327. 1
  20328. 1
  20329. 1
  20330. 1
  20331. 1
  20332. 1
  20333. 1
  20334. 1
  20335. 1
  20336. 1
  20337. 1
  20338. 1
  20339. 1
  20340. 1
  20341. 1
  20342. 1
  20343. 1
  20344. 1
  20345. 1
  20346. 1
  20347. 1
  20348. 1
  20349. 1
  20350. 1
  20351. 1
  20352. 1
  20353. 1
  20354. 1
  20355. 1
  20356.  @strasbourgerelsass1467  Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  20357. 1
  20358. 1
  20359. 1
  20360. 1
  20361. 1
  20362. 1
  20363. 1
  20364. 1
  20365. 1
  20366. 1
  20367. 1
  20368. 1
  20369. 1
  20370. 1
  20371. 1
  20372. 1
  20373. 1
  20374. 1
  20375. 1
  20376. 1
  20377. 1
  20378. 1
  20379. 1
  20380. 1
  20381. 1
  20382. 1
  20383. 1
  20384. 1
  20385. 1
  20386. 1
  20387. 1
  20388. 1
  20389. 1
  20390. 1
  20391. 1
  20392. 1
  20393. 1
  20394. 1
  20395. 1
  20396. 1
  20397. 1
  20398. 1
  20399. 1
  20400. 1
  20401. 1
  20402. 1
  20403. 1
  20404. 1
  20405. 1
  20406. 1
  20407. 1
  20408. 1
  20409. 1
  20410. 1
  20411. 1
  20412. 1
  20413. 1
  20414. 1
  20415. 1
  20416. 1
  20417. 1
  20418. 1
  20419. 1
  20420. 1
  20421. 1
  20422. 1
  20423. 1
  20424. 1
  20425. 1
  20426. 1
  20427. 1
  20428. 1
  20429. 1
  20430. 1
  20431. 1
  20432. 1
  20433. 1
  20434. 1
  20435. 1
  20436. 1
  20437. 1
  20438. 1
  20439. 1
  20440. 1
  20441. 1
  20442. 1
  20443. 1
  20444. 1
  20445. 1
  20446. 1
  20447. 1
  20448. 1
  20449. 1
  20450. 1
  20451. 1
  20452. 1
  20453. 1
  20454. 1
  20455. 1
  20456. 1
  20457. 1
  20458. 1
  20459. 1
  20460. 1
  20461. 1
  20462. @Ezioauditore9300 All because of a lie. As an Iraqi watching the footage of that wretched night it takes me back to that feeling of absolute horror and uncertainty as the sky turned red all of a sudden and missiles started flying through the sky from opposite directions, how my mother pulled me and my younger brother inside as we were watching from our small apartment's balcony and ran inside to put some useless surgical masks she had aqquired as she worked as a nurse on our little faces because rumors spread that the Americans will start bombarding us with chemical weapons. I still remember hardly falling asleep in my mother's lap alongside my brother clutching to whatever little fake bravness my mother is trying to hold for us not to panic and to go to sleep. In the mean time my father fidgeting between the roof and to the street, talking to the neighbors trying to make sense of what's happening as we all were taken by surprise, and finally sitting alone in the living room defeated as he was certian that his family's safety was no longer in his handa and there is absolutely nothing to be done against the goliath that is American army at our doorsteps. Growing up, I can almost feel what my parents went through at dark times like those, and the travisities didn't stop at that. the destruction of the Iraqi infrastructure didn't stop at only bombing importanct facilities like power plants, hospitals, shelters, oil plants, main roads, no the Americans knew just how to put us a 100 years behind compared other countries, an organized hunt mission on the country's best minds was initiated by the us proxies; doctors, engineers, scientists, teachers, and much more. a year of civil war followed, also induced by american influence that took the lives of so many poor innocent men. I feel I wrote so much yet I told so little, I can write a book about what we had to endure just so chaney can get richer and so that Bush would get a round of applause at the congress. But after all who would listen, these facts are all presented and have been known ever since 2005 and yet no one was brought to court, I guess this is how the world works, where justice can only be seen in comic books and movies which are also american made. And all of that happened because of that damned lie.
    1
  20463. 1
  20464. 1
  20465. 1
  20466. 1
  20467. 1
  20468. 1
  20469. 1
  20470. 1
  20471. 1
  20472. 1
  20473. 1
  20474. 1
  20475. 1
  20476. 1
  20477. 1
  20478. 1
  20479. 1
  20480. 1
  20481. 1
  20482. 1
  20483. 1
  20484. 1
  20485. 1
  20486. 1
  20487. 1
  20488. 1
  20489. 1
  20490. 1
  20491. 1
  20492. 1
  20493. 1
  20494. 1
  20495. 1
  20496. 1
  20497. 1
  20498. 1
  20499. 1
  20500. 1
  20501. 1
  20502. 1
  20503. 1
  20504. 1
  20505. 1
  20506. 1
  20507. 1
  20508. 1
  20509. 1
  20510. 1
  20511. 1
  20512. 1
  20513. 1
  20514. 1
  20515. 1
  20516. 1
  20517. 1
  20518. 1
  20519. 1
  20520. 1
  20521. 1
  20522. 1
  20523. 1
  20524. 1
  20525. 1
  20526. 1
  20527. 1
  20528. 1
  20529. 1
  20530. 1
  20531. 1
  20532. 1
  20533. 1
  20534. 1
  20535. 1
  20536. 1
  20537. 1
  20538. 1
  20539. 1
  20540. 1
  20541. 1
  20542. 1
  20543. 1
  20544. 1
  20545. 1
  20546. 1
  20547. 1
  20548. 1
  20549. 1
  20550. 1
  20551. 1
  20552. 1
  20553. 1
  20554. 1
  20555. 1
  20556. 1
  20557. 1
  20558. 1
  20559. 1
  20560. 1
  20561. 1
  20562. 1
  20563. 1
  20564. 1
  20565. 1
  20566. 1
  20567. 1
  20568. 1
  20569. 1
  20570. 1
  20571. 1
  20572. 1
  20573. 1
  20574. 1
  20575. 1
  20576. 1
  20577. 1
  20578. 1
  20579. 1
  20580. 1
  20581. 1
  20582. 1
  20583. 1
  20584. 1
  20585. 1
  20586. 1
  20587. 1
  20588. 1
  20589. 1
  20590. 1
  20591. 1
  20592. 1
  20593. 1
  20594. 1
  20595. 1
  20596. 1
  20597. 1
  20598. 1
  20599. 1
  20600. 1
  20601. 1
  20602. 1
  20603. 1
  20604. 1
  20605. 1
  20606. 1
  20607. 1
  20608. 1
  20609. 1
  20610. 1
  20611. 1
  20612. 1
  20613. 1
  20614. 1
  20615. 1
  20616. 1
  20617. 1
  20618. 1
  20619. 1
  20620. 1
  20621. 1
  20622. 1
  20623.  @felixmoyoedonmi  News Desk August 15 2022. White House finalizes theft of Afghanistan’s foreign reserves Besides stealing Afghanistan’s reserves, Washington has also washed its hands of the several war crimes committed by US troops during the disastrous pull-out last year. On the first anniversary of the Taliban's victory against the US-trained army, Washington unilaterally decided to keep $7bln of Afghanistan's foreign reserves The government of US President Joe Biden has decided not to return Afghanistan’s foreign reserves and suspended talks with Taliban officials over the issue. Following the botched withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan last year, Washington froze $7 billion of the country’s foreign reserves. Officials then decided to earmark half of the funds to pay the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks. “It is both morally condemnable and politically and economically reckless to impose collective punishment on an entire people for the actions of a government they did not choose,” reads a letter drafted by 70 economists and experts which was delivered to the White House last week. The loss of its foreign reserves has pushed Afghanistan into an acute humanitarian crisis, as the central bank lacks the resources to combat high inflation and help a populace on the brink of starvation. A report by the Save the Children NGO shows that 97 percent of Afghan families are struggling to provide enough food for their children, while almost 80 percent of children say they are going to bed hungry.
    1
  20624. 1
  20625. 1
  20626. 1
  20627. 1
  20628. 1
  20629. 1
  20630. 1
  20631. 1
  20632. 1
  20633. 1
  20634. 1
  20635. 1
  20636. 1
  20637. 1
  20638. 1
  20639. 1
  20640. 1
  20641. 1
  20642. 1
  20643. 1
  20644. 1
  20645. 1
  20646. 1
  20647. 1
  20648. 1
  20649. 1
  20650. 1
  20651. 1
  20652. 1
  20653. 1
  20654. 1
  20655. 1
  20656. 1
  20657. 1
  20658. 1
  20659. 1
  20660. 1
  20661. 1
  20662. 1
  20663. 1
  20664. 1
  20665. 1
  20666. 1
  20667. 1
  20668. 1
  20669. 1
  20670. 1
  20671. 1
  20672. 1
  20673. 1
  20674. 1
  20675. 1
  20676. 1
  20677. 1
  20678. 1
  20679. 1
  20680. 1
  20681. 1
  20682. 1
  20683. 1
  20684. 1
  20685. 1
  20686. 1
  20687. 1
  20688. 1
  20689. 1
  20690. 1
  20691. 1
  20692. 1
  20693. 1
  20694. 1
  20695. 1
  20696. 1
  20697. 1
  20698. 1
  20699. 1
  20700. 1
  20701. 1
  20702. 1
  20703. 1
  20704. 1
  20705. 1
  20706. 1
  20707. 1
  20708. 1
  20709. 1
  20710. 1
  20711. 1
  20712. 1
  20713. 1
  20714. UN : Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    1
  20715. 1
  20716. 1
  20717. 1
  20718. 1
  20719. 1
  20720. 1
  20721. 1
  20722. 1
  20723. 1
  20724. 1
  20725. 1
  20726. 1
  20727. 1
  20728. 1
  20729. 1
  20730. 1
  20731. 1
  20732. 1
  20733. 1
  20734. 1
  20735. 1
  20736. 1
  20737. 1
  20738. 1
  20739. 1
  20740. 1
  20741. 1
  20742. 1
  20743. 1
  20744. 1
  20745. 1
  20746. 1
  20747. 1
  20748. 1
  20749. 1
  20750. 1
  20751. 1
  20752. 1
  20753. 1
  20754. 1
  20755. 1
  20756. 1
  20757. 1
  20758. 1
  20759. 1
  20760. 1
  20761. 1
  20762. 1
  20763. 1
  20764. 1
  20765. 1
  20766. 1
  20767. 1
  20768. 1
  20769. 1
  20770. 1
  20771. 1
  20772. 1
  20773. 1
  20774. 1
  20775. 1
  20776. 1
  20777. 1
  20778. 1
  20779. 1
  20780. 1
  20781. 1
  20782. 1
  20783. 1
  20784. 1
  20785. 1
  20786. 1
  20787. 1
  20788. 1
  20789. 1
  20790. 1
  20791. 1
  20792. 1
  20793. 1
  20794. 1
  20795. 1
  20796. 1
  20797. 1
  20798. 1
  20799. 1
  20800. 1
  20801. 1
  20802. 1
  20803. 1
  20804. 1
  20805. 1
  20806. 1
  20807. 1
  20808. 1
  20809. 1
  20810. 1
  20811. 1
  20812. 1
  20813. 1
  20814. 1
  20815. 1
  20816. 1
  20817. 1
  20818. 1
  20819. 1
  20820. 1
  20821. 1
  20822. 1
  20823. 1
  20824. 1
  20825. 1
  20826. 1
  20827. 1
  20828. 1
  20829. 1
  20830. 1
  20831. 1
  20832. 1
  20833. 1
  20834. 1
  20835. 1
  20836. 1
  20837. 1
  20838. 1
  20839. 1
  20840. 1
  20841. 1
  20842. 1
  20843. 1
  20844. 1
  20845. 1
  20846. 1
  20847. 1
  20848. 1
  20849. 1
  20850. 1
  20851. 1
  20852. 1
  20853. 1
  20854. 1
  20855. 1
  20856. 1
  20857. 1
  20858. 1
  20859. 1
  20860. 1
  20861. 1
  20862. 1
  20863. 1
  20864. 1
  20865. 1
  20866. 1
  20867. 1
  20868. 1
  20869. 1
  20870. 1
  20871. 1
  20872. 1
  20873. 1
  20874. 1
  20875. 1
  20876. 1
  20877. 1
  20878. 1
  20879. 1
  20880. 1
  20881. 1
  20882. 1
  20883. 1
  20884. 1
  20885. 1
  20886. 1
  20887. 1
  20888. 1
  20889. 1
  20890. 1
  20891. 1
  20892. 1
  20893. 1
  20894. 1
  20895. 1
  20896. 1
  20897. 1
  20898. 1
  20899. 1
  20900. 1
  20901. 1
  20902. 1
  20903. 1
  20904. 1
  20905. 1
  20906. 1
  20907. 1
  20908. 1
  20909. 1
  20910. 1
  20911. 1
  20912. 1
  20913. 1
  20914. 1
  20915. 1
  20916. 1
  20917. 1
  20918. 1
  20919. 1
  20920. 1
  20921. 1
  20922. 1
  20923. 1
  20924. 1
  20925. 1
  20926. 1
  20927. 1
  20928. 1
  20929. 1
  20930. 1
  20931. 1
  20932. 1
  20933. 1
  20934. 1
  20935. 1
  20936. 1
  20937. 1
  20938. 1
  20939. 1
  20940. 1
  20941. 1
  20942. 1
  20943. 1
  20944. 1
  20945. 1
  20946. 1
  20947. 1
  20948. 1
  20949. 1
  20950. 1
  20951. 1
  20952. 1
  20953. 1
  20954. 1
  20955. 1
  20956. 1
  20957. 1
  20958. 1
  20959. 1
  20960. 1
  20961. 1
  20962. 1
  20963. 1
  20964. 1
  20965. 1
  20966. 1
  20967. 1
  20968. 1
  20969. 1
  20970. 1
  20971. 1
  20972. 1
  20973. 1
  20974. 1
  20975. 1
  20976. 1
  20977. 1
  20978. 1
  20979. 1
  20980. 1
  20981. 1
  20982. 1
  20983. 1
  20984. 1
  20985. 1
  20986. 1
  20987. 1
  20988. 1
  20989. 1
  20990. 1
  20991. 1
  20992. 1
  20993. 1
  20994. 1
  20995. 1
  20996. 1
  20997. 1
  20998. 1
  20999. 1
  21000. 1
  21001. 1
  21002. 1
  21003. 1
  21004. 1
  21005. 1
  21006. 1
  21007. 1
  21008. 1
  21009. 1
  21010. 1
  21011. 1
  21012. 1
  21013. 1
  21014. 1
  21015. 1
  21016. 1
  21017. 1
  21018. 1
  21019. 1
  21020. 1
  21021. 1
  21022. 1
  21023. 1
  21024. 1
  21025. 1
  21026. 1
  21027. 1
  21028. 1
  21029. 1
  21030. 1
  21031. 1
  21032. 1
  21033. 1
  21034. 1
  21035. 1
  21036. 1
  21037. 1
  21038. 1
  21039. 1
  21040. 1
  21041. 1
  21042. 1
  21043. 1
  21044. 1
  21045. 1
  21046. 1
  21047. 1
  21048. 1
  21049. 1
  21050. 1
  21051. 1
  21052. 1
  21053. 1
  21054. 1
  21055. 1
  21056. 1
  21057. 1
  21058. 1
  21059. 1
  21060. 1
  21061. 1
  21062. 1
  21063. 1
  21064. 1
  21065. 1
  21066. 1
  21067. 1
  21068. 1
  21069. 1
  21070. 1
  21071. 1
  21072. 1
  21073. 1
  21074. 1
  21075. 1
  21076. 1
  21077. 1
  21078. 1
  21079. 1
  21080. 1
  21081. 1
  21082. 1
  21083. 1
  21084. 1
  21085. 1
  21086. 1
  21087. 1
  21088. 1
  21089. 1
  21090. 1
  21091. 1
  21092. 1
  21093. 1
  21094. 1
  21095. 1
  21096. 1
  21097. 1
  21098. 1
  21099. 1
  21100. 1
  21101. 1
  21102. 1
  21103. 1
  21104. 1
  21105. 1
  21106. 1
  21107. 1
  21108. 1
  21109. 1
  21110. 1
  21111. 1
  21112. 1
  21113. 1
  21114. 1
  21115. 1
  21116. 1
  21117. 1
  21118. 1
  21119. 1
  21120. 1
  21121. 1
  21122. 1
  21123. 1
  21124. 1
  21125. 1
  21126. 1
  21127. 1
  21128. 1
  21129. 1
  21130. 1
  21131. 1
  21132. 1
  21133. 1
  21134. 1
  21135. 1
  21136. 1
  21137. 1
  21138. 1
  21139. 1
  21140. 1
  21141. 1
  21142. 1
  21143. 1
  21144. 1
  21145. 1
  21146. 1
  21147. 1
  21148. 1
  21149. 1
  21150. 1
  21151. 1
  21152. 1
  21153. 1
  21154. 1
  21155. 1
  21156. 1
  21157. 1
  21158. 1
  21159. 1
  21160. 1
  21161. 1
  21162. 1
  21163. 1
  21164. 1
  21165. 1
  21166. 1
  21167. 1
  21168. 1
  21169. 1
  21170. 1
  21171. 😅😅 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  21172. 1
  21173. 1
  21174. 1
  21175. 1
  21176. 1
  21177. 1
  21178. 1
  21179. 1
  21180. 1
  21181. 1
  21182. 1
  21183. 1
  21184. 1
  21185. 1
  21186. 1
  21187. 1
  21188. 1
  21189. 1
  21190. 1
  21191. 1
  21192. 1
  21193. 1
  21194. 1
  21195. 1
  21196. 1
  21197. 1
  21198. 1
  21199. 1
  21200. 1
  21201. 1
  21202. 1
  21203. 1
  21204. 1
  21205. 1
  21206. 1
  21207. 1
  21208. 1
  21209. 1
  21210. 1
  21211. 1
  21212. 1
  21213. 1
  21214. 1
  21215. 1
  21216. 1
  21217. 1
  21218. 1
  21219. 1
  21220. 1
  21221. 1
  21222. 1
  21223. 1
  21224. 1
  21225. 1
  21226. 1
  21227. 1
  21228. 1
  21229. 1
  21230. 1
  21231. 1
  21232. 1
  21233. 1
  21234. 1
  21235. 1
  21236. 1
  21237. 1
  21238. 1
  21239. 1
  21240. 1
  21241. 1
  21242. 1
  21243. 1
  21244. 1
  21245. 1
  21246. 1
  21247. 1
  21248. 1
  21249. 1
  21250. 1
  21251. 1
  21252. 1
  21253. 1
  21254. 1
  21255. 1
  21256. 1
  21257. 1
  21258. 1
  21259. 1
  21260. 1
  21261. 1
  21262. 1
  21263. 1
  21264. 1
  21265. 1
  21266. 1
  21267. 1
  21268. 1
  21269. 1
  21270. 1
  21271. 1
  21272. 1
  21273. 1
  21274. 1
  21275. 1
  21276. 1
  21277. 1
  21278. 1
  21279. 1
  21280. 1
  21281. 1
  21282. 1
  21283. 1
  21284. 1
  21285. 1
  21286. 1
  21287. 1
  21288. 1
  21289. 1
  21290. 1
  21291. 1
  21292. 1
  21293. 1
  21294. 1
  21295. 1
  21296. 1
  21297. 1
  21298. 1
  21299. 1
  21300. 1
  21301. 1
  21302. 1
  21303. 1
  21304. 1
  21305. 1
  21306. 1
  21307. 1
  21308. 1
  21309. 1
  21310. 1
  21311. 1
  21312. 1
  21313. 1
  21314. 1
  21315. 1
  21316. 1
  21317. 1
  21318. 1
  21319. 1
  21320. 1
  21321. 1
  21322. 1
  21323. 1
  21324. 1
  21325. 1
  21326. 1
  21327. 1
  21328. 1
  21329. 1
  21330. 1
  21331. 1
  21332. 1
  21333. 1
  21334. 1
  21335. 1
  21336. 1
  21337. 1
  21338. 1
  21339. 1
  21340. 1
  21341. 1
  21342. 1
  21343. 1
  21344. 1
  21345. 1
  21346. 1
  21347. 1
  21348. 1
  21349. 1
  21350. 1
  21351. 1
  21352. 1
  21353. 1
  21354. 1
  21355. 1
  21356. 1
  21357. 1
  21358. 1
  21359. 1
  21360. 1
  21361. 1
  21362. 1
  21363. 1
  21364. 1
  21365. 1
  21366. 1
  21367. 1
  21368. 1
  21369. 1
  21370. 1
  21371. 1
  21372. 1
  21373. 1
  21374. 1
  21375. 1
  21376. 1
  21377. 1
  21378. 1
  21379. 1
  21380. 1
  21381. 1
  21382. 1
  21383. 1
  21384. 1
  21385. 1
  21386. 1
  21387. 1
  21388. 1
  21389. 1
  21390. 1
  21391. 1
  21392. 1
  21393. 1
  21394. 1
  21395. 1
  21396. 1
  21397. 1
  21398. 1
  21399. 1
  21400. 1
  21401. 1
  21402. 1
  21403. 1
  21404. 1
  21405. 1
  21406. 1
  21407. 1
  21408. 1
  21409. 1
  21410. 1
  21411. 1
  21412. 1
  21413. 1
  21414. 1
  21415. 1
  21416. 1
  21417. 1
  21418. 1
  21419. 1
  21420. 1
  21421. 1
  21422. 1
  21423. 1
  21424. 1
  21425. 1
  21426. 1
  21427. 1
  21428. 1
  21429. 1
  21430. 1
  21431. 1
  21432. 1
  21433. 1
  21434. 1
  21435. 1
  21436. 1
  21437. 1
  21438. 1
  21439. 1
  21440. 1
  21441. 1
  21442. 1
  21443. 1
  21444. 1
  21445. 1
  21446. 1
  21447. 1
  21448. 1
  21449. 1
  21450. 1
  21451. 1
  21452. 1
  21453. 1
  21454. 1
  21455. 1
  21456. 1
  21457. 1
  21458. 1
  21459. 1
  21460. 1
  21461. 1
  21462. 1
  21463. 1
  21464. 1
  21465. 1
  21466. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  21467. 1
  21468. 1
  21469. 1
  21470. 1
  21471. 1
  21472. 1
  21473. 1
  21474. 1
  21475. 1
  21476. 1
  21477. 1
  21478. 1
  21479. 1
  21480. 1
  21481. 1
  21482. 1
  21483. 1
  21484. 1
  21485. 1
  21486. 1
  21487. 1
  21488. 1
  21489. 1
  21490. 1
  21491. 1
  21492. 1
  21493. 1
  21494. 1
  21495. 1
  21496. 1
  21497. 1
  21498. 1
  21499. 1
  21500. 1
  21501. 1
  21502. 1
  21503. 1
  21504. 1
  21505. 1
  21506. 1
  21507. 1
  21508. 12-9-2023 Germany's Baerbock Humiliated In Dressing Down By Ukraine Foreign Minister Things took a turn at the joint presser when a journalist asked about the difficulties of the counteroffensive along the southern front, and posed whether Kubela thinks Kiev's Western backers should supply weapons like the Taurus "quicker and faster".... Kubela then explained he had pressed the German delegation for Taurus deliveries as soon as possible, but that Baerbock left him no "hope" in these meetings. He then in a smug and patronizing tone looked toward her and said: "No, she didn't go beyond the official position of the German government... but you'll do it anyway, it's just a matter of time." "You will do it anyway, its just a matter of time, and I don't understand why we are wasting time," Kuleba said in response to a question at a press conference. Kubula then described that more and more Ukrainian lives have been lost due to Western delays in weapons approval and deliveries. The suggestion was that it's Berlin's fault (and that of other slow to play along allies). Online commentators were quick to point out how "embarrassing" and "pathetic" the moment was for the German side. Others pointed out the "arrogance" on display by Kubela, given also she made the lengthy, dangerous trip into Kiev to announce new humanitarian aid. Such "gifts" weren't enough. One regional commentator had this to say in response to the clip: "So here we have a US protectorate (Germany) being publicly mocked by a US proxy (Ukraine). One of the pitfalls of military alignment — the interests of the alliance as defined by the alliance leader is always supreme."
    1
  21509. 1
  21510. 1
  21511. 1
  21512. 1
  21513. 1
  21514. 1
  21515. 1
  21516. 1
  21517. 1
  21518. 1
  21519. 1
  21520. 1
  21521. 1
  21522. 1
  21523. 1
  21524. 1
  21525. 1
  21526. 1
  21527. 1
  21528. 1
  21529. 1
  21530. 1
  21531. 1
  21532. 1
  21533. 1
  21534. 1
  21535. 1
  21536. 1
  21537. 1
  21538. 1
  21539. 1
  21540. 1
  21541. 1
  21542. 1
  21543.  @stupidburp  Shameless as ever. This tyrant dictatorship country should be stopped. News Desk August 15 2022. White House finalizes theft of Afghanistan’s foreign reserves Besides stealing Afghanistan’s reserves, Washington has also washed its hands of the several war crimes committed by US troops during the disastrous pull-out last year. On the first anniversary of the Taliban's victory against the US-trained army, Washington unilaterally decided to keep $7bln of Afghanistan's foreign reserves The government of US President Joe Biden has decided not to return Afghanistan’s foreign reserves and suspended talks with Taliban officials over the issue. Following the botched withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan last year, Washington froze $7 billion of the country’s foreign reserves. Officials then decided to earmark half of the funds to pay the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks. “It is both morally condemnable and politically and economically reckless to impose collective punishment on an entire people for the actions of a government they did not choose,” reads a letter drafted by 70 economists and experts which was delivered to the White House last week. The loss of its foreign reserves has pushed Afghanistan into an acute humanitarian crisis, as the central bank lacks the resources to combat high inflation and help a populace on the brink of starvation. A report by the Save the Children NGO shows that 97 percent of Afghan families are struggling to provide enough food for their children, while almost 80 percent of children say they are going to bed hungry.
    1
  21544. 1
  21545. 1
  21546. 1
  21547. 1
  21548. 1
  21549. 1
  21550. 1
  21551. 1
  21552. 1
  21553. 1
  21554. 1
  21555. 1
  21556. 1
  21557. 1
  21558. 1
  21559. 1
  21560. 1
  21561. 1
  21562. 1
  21563. 1
  21564. 1
  21565. 1
  21566. 1
  21567. 1
  21568. 1
  21569. 1
  21570. 1
  21571. 1
  21572. 1
  21573. 1
  21574. 1
  21575. 1
  21576. 1
  21577. 1
  21578. 1
  21579. 1
  21580. 1
  21581. 1
  21582. 1
  21583. 1
  21584. 1
  21585. 1
  21586. 1
  21587. 1
  21588. 1
  21589. 1
  21590. 1
  21591. 1
  21592. 1
  21593. 1
  21594. 1
  21595. 1
  21596. 1
  21597. 1
  21598. 1
  21599. 1
  21600. 1
  21601. 1
  21602. 1
  21603. 1
  21604. 1
  21605. 1
  21606. 1
  21607. 1
  21608. 1
  21609. 1
  21610. 1
  21611. 1
  21612. 1
  21613. 1
  21614. 1
  21615. 1
  21616. 1
  21617. 1
  21618. 1
  21619. 1
  21620. 1
  21621. 1
  21622. 1
  21623. 1
  21624. 1
  21625. 1
  21626. 1
  21627. 1
  21628. 1
  21629. 1
  21630. 1
  21631. 1
  21632. 1
  21633. 1
  21634. 1
  21635. 1
  21636. 1
  21637. 1
  21638. 1
  21639. 1
  21640. 1
  21641. 1
  21642. 1
  21643. 1
  21644. 1
  21645. 1
  21646. 1
  21647. 1
  21648. 1
  21649. 1
  21650. 1
  21651. 1
  21652. 1
  21653. 1
  21654. 1
  21655. 1
  21656. 1
  21657. 1
  21658. 1
  21659. 1
  21660. 1
  21661. 1
  21662. 1
  21663. 1
  21664. 1
  21665. 1
  21666. 1
  21667. 1
  21668. 1
  21669. 1
  21670. 1
  21671. 1
  21672. 1
  21673. 1
  21674. 1
  21675. 1
  21676. 1
  21677. 1
  21678. 1
  21679. 1
  21680. 1
  21681. 1
  21682. 1
  21683. 1
  21684. 1
  21685. 1
  21686. 1
  21687. 1
  21688. 1
  21689. 1
  21690. 1
  21691. 1
  21692. 1
  21693. 1
  21694. 1
  21695. 1
  21696. 1
  21697. 1
  21698. 1
  21699. 1
  21700. 1
  21701. 1
  21702. 1
  21703. 1
  21704. 1
  21705. 1
  21706. 1
  21707. 1
  21708. 1
  21709. 1
  21710. 1
  21711. 1
  21712. 1
  21713. 1
  21714. 1
  21715. 1
  21716. 1
  21717. 1
  21718. 1
  21719. 1
  21720. 1
  21721. 1
  21722. 1
  21723. 1
  21724. 1
  21725. 1
  21726. 1
  21727. 1
  21728. 1
  21729. 1
  21730. 1
  21731. 1
  21732. 1
  21733. 1
  21734. 1
  21735. 1
  21736. 1
  21737. 1
  21738. 1
  21739. 1
  21740. 1
  21741. 1
  21742. 1
  21743. 1
  21744. 1
  21745. 1
  21746. 1
  21747. 1
  21748. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  21749. 1
  21750. 1
  21751. 1
  21752. 1
  21753. 1
  21754. 1
  21755. 1
  21756. 1
  21757. 1
  21758. 1
  21759. 1
  21760. 1
  21761. 1
  21762. 1
  21763. 1
  21764. 1
  21765. 1
  21766. 1
  21767. 1
  21768. 1
  21769. 1
  21770. 1
  21771. 1
  21772. 1
  21773. 1
  21774. 1
  21775. 1
  21776. 1
  21777. 1
  21778. 1
  21779. 1
  21780. 1
  21781. 1
  21782. 1
  21783. 1
  21784. 1
  21785. 1
  21786. 1
  21787. 1
  21788. 1
  21789. 1
  21790. 1
  21791. 1
  21792. 1
  21793. 1
  21794. 1
  21795. 1
  21796. 1
  21797. 1
  21798. 1
  21799. 1
  21800. 1
  21801. 1
  21802. 1
  21803. 1
  21804. 1
  21805. 1
  21806. 1
  21807. 1
  21808. 1
  21809. 1
  21810. 1
  21811. 1
  21812. 1
  21813. 1
  21814. 1
  21815. 1
  21816. 1
  21817. 1
  21818. 1
  21819. 1
  21820. 1
  21821. 1
  21822. 1
  21823. 1
  21824. 1
  21825. 1
  21826. 1
  21827. 1
  21828. 1
  21829. 1
  21830. 1
  21831. 1
  21832. 1
  21833. 1
  21834. 1
  21835. 1
  21836. 1
  21837. 1
  21838. 1
  21839. 1
  21840. 1
  21841. 1
  21842. 1
  21843. 1
  21844. 1
  21845. 1
  21846. 1
  21847. 1
  21848. 1
  21849. 1
  21850. 1
  21851. 1
  21852. 1
  21853. 1
  21854. 1
  21855. 1
  21856. 1
  21857. 1
  21858. 1
  21859. 1
  21860. 1
  21861. 1
  21862. 1
  21863. 1
  21864. 1
  21865. 1
  21866. 1
  21867. 1
  21868. 1
  21869. 1
  21870. 1
  21871. 1
  21872. 1
  21873. 1
  21874. 1
  21875. 1
  21876. 1
  21877. 1
  21878. 1
  21879. 1
  21880. 1
  21881. 1
  21882. 1
  21883. 1
  21884. 1
  21885. 1
  21886. 1
  21887. 1
  21888. 1
  21889. 1
  21890. 1
  21891. 1
  21892. 1
  21893. 1
  21894. 1
  21895. 1
  21896. 1
  21897. 1
  21898. 1
  21899. 1
  21900. 1
  21901. 1
  21902. 1
  21903. 1
  21904. 1
  21905. 1
  21906. 1
  21907. 1
  21908. 1
  21909. 1
  21910. 1
  21911. 1
  21912. 1
  21913. 1
  21914. 1
  21915. 1
  21916. 1
  21917. 1
  21918. SINGAPORE – A 25-year-old Singaporean student died after he was stabbed in the abdomen in the city centre of Brussels on Nov 7. The victim was taken to hospital, where he died, according to a statement from the Brussels Public Prosecutor’s Office that same day. The Brussels police received a call for assistance at Sint-Pietersstraat, a street in the Belgian capital, at 2.30am local time (9.30am Singapore time), according to local reports. Two 18-year-old males have been identified and detained by the Brussels police after house searches. “The first elements of the investigation show that the victim was approached by the two suspects and that an argument resulted in a stabbing,” said Public Prosecutor’s Office spokeswoman Yasmina Vanoverschelde. According to Brussels media outlet Bruzz, the victim was with two students in the city centre that evening when two strangers harassed the group. The trio later went to Sint-Pietersstraat. When the victim was alone, the two suspects approached him, with one of them allegedly pulling out a knife. The police administered first aid to the victim until the paramedics arrived. A police cordon was set up at the scene of the incident. The police also informed the magistrate on duty at the Brussels Public Prosecutor’s Office, who requested an investigating judge, who visited the scene. Brussels’ public prosecutor said the exact circumstances of the incident have yet to be clarified at this stage of the investigation. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said in a statement on Nov 8 that the Singapore Embassy in Brussels has been providing consular assistance to the family of the victim and is in contact with the authorities in Belgium. “MFA extends its deepest condolences to the bereaved family,” it added.
    1
  21919. 1
  21920. 1
  21921. 1
  21922. 1
  21923. 1
  21924. 1
  21925. 1
  21926. 1
  21927. 1
  21928. 1
  21929. 1
  21930. 1
  21931. 1
  21932. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent. 😂😂😂 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3cE6siiqaw
    1
  21933. 1
  21934. 1
  21935. 1
  21936. 1
  21937. 1
  21938. 1
  21939. 1
  21940. 1
  21941. 1
  21942. 1
  21943. 1
  21944. 1
  21945. 1
  21946. 1
  21947. 1
  21948. 1
  21949. 1
  21950. 1
  21951. 1
  21952. 1
  21953. 1
  21954. 1
  21955. 1
  21956. 1
  21957. 1
  21958. 1
  21959. 1
  21960. 1
  21961. 1
  21962. 1
  21963. 1
  21964. 1
  21965. 1
  21966. 1
  21967. 1
  21968. 1
  21969. 1
  21970. 1
  21971. 1
  21972. 1
  21973. 1
  21974. 1
  21975. 1
  21976. 1
  21977. 1
  21978. 1
  21979. 1
  21980. 1
  21981. 1
  21982. 1
  21983. 1
  21984. 1
  21985. 1
  21986. 1
  21987. 1
  21988. 1
  21989. 1
  21990. 1
  21991. 1
  21992. 1
  21993. 1
  21994. 1
  21995. 1
  21996. 1
  21997. 1
  21998. 1
  21999. 1
  22000. 1
  22001. 1
  22002. 1
  22003. 1
  22004. 1
  22005. 1
  22006. 1
  22007. 1
  22008. 1
  22009. 1
  22010. 1
  22011. 1
  22012. 1
  22013. 1
  22014. 1
  22015. 1
  22016. 1
  22017. 1
  22018. 1
  22019. 1
  22020. 1
  22021. 1
  22022. 1
  22023. 1
  22024. 1
  22025. 1
  22026. 1
  22027. 1
  22028. 1
  22029. 1
  22030. 1
  22031. 1
  22032. 1
  22033. 1
  22034. 1
  22035. 1
  22036. 1
  22037. 1
  22038. 1
  22039. 1
  22040. 1
  22041. 1
  22042. 1
  22043. 1
  22044. 1
  22045. 1
  22046. 1
  22047. 1
  22048. 1
  22049. 1
  22050. 1
  22051. 1
  22052. 1
  22053. 1
  22054. 1
  22055. 1
  22056. 1
  22057. 1
  22058. 1
  22059. 1
  22060. 1
  22061. 1
  22062. 1
  22063. 1
  22064. 1
  22065. 1
  22066. 1
  22067. 1
  22068. 1
  22069. 1
  22070. 1
  22071. 1
  22072. 1
  22073. 1
  22074. 1
  22075. 1
  22076. 1
  22077. 1
  22078. 1
  22079. 1
  22080. 1
  22081. 1
  22082. 1
  22083. 1
  22084. 1
  22085. 1
  22086. 1
  22087. 1
  22088. 1
  22089. 1
  22090. 1
  22091. 1
  22092. 1
  22093. 1
  22094. 1
  22095. 1
  22096. 1
  22097. 1
  22098. 1
  22099. 1
  22100. 1
  22101. 1
  22102. 1
  22103. 1
  22104. 1
  22105. 1
  22106. 1
  22107. 1
  22108. 1
  22109. 1
  22110. 1
  22111. 1
  22112. 1
  22113. 1
  22114. 1
  22115. 1
  22116. 1
  22117. 1
  22118. 1
  22119. 1
  22120. 1
  22121. 1
  22122. 1
  22123. 1
  22124. 1
  22125. 1
  22126. 1
  22127. 1
  22128. 1
  22129. 1
  22130. 1
  22131. 1
  22132. 1
  22133. 1
  22134. 1
  22135. 1
  22136. 1
  22137. 1
  22138. 1
  22139. 1
  22140. 1
  22141. 1
  22142. 1
  22143. 1
  22144. 1
  22145. 1
  22146. 1
  22147. 1
  22148. 1
  22149. 1
  22150. 1
  22151. 1
  22152. 1
  22153. 1
  22154. 1
  22155. 1
  22156. 1
  22157. 1
  22158. 1
  22159. 1
  22160. 1
  22161. 1
  22162. 1
  22163. 1
  22164. 1
  22165. 1
  22166. 1
  22167. 1
  22168. 1
  22169. 1
  22170. 1
  22171. 1
  22172. 1
  22173. 1
  22174. 1
  22175. 1
  22176. 1
  22177. 1
  22178. 1
  22179. 1
  22180. 1
  22181. 1
  22182. 1
  22183. 1
  22184. 1
  22185. 1
  22186. 1
  22187. 1
  22188. 1
  22189. 1
  22190. 1
  22191. 1
  22192. 1
  22193. 1
  22194. 1
  22195. 1
  22196. 1
  22197. 1
  22198. 1
  22199. 1
  22200. 1
  22201. 1
  22202. 1
  22203. 1
  22204. 1
  22205. 1
  22206. 1
  22207. 1
  22208. 1
  22209. 1
  22210. 1
  22211. 1
  22212. 1
  22213. 1
  22214. 1
  22215. 1
  22216. 1
  22217. 1
  22218. 1
  22219. 1
  22220. 1
  22221. 1
  22222. 1
  22223. 1
  22224. 1
  22225. 1
  22226. 1
  22227. 1
  22228. 1
  22229. 1
  22230. 1
  22231. 1
  22232. 1
  22233. 1
  22234. 1
  22235. 1
  22236. 1
  22237. 1
  22238. 1
  22239. 1
  22240. 1
  22241. 1
  22242. 1
  22243. 1
  22244. 1
  22245. 1
  22246. 1
  22247. 1
  22248. 1
  22249. 1
  22250. 1
  22251. 1
  22252. 1
  22253. 1
  22254. 1
  22255. 1
  22256. 1
  22257. 1
  22258. 1
  22259. 1
  22260. 1
  22261. 1
  22262. 1
  22263. 1
  22264. 1
  22265. 1
  22266. 1
  22267. 1
  22268. 1
  22269. 1
  22270. 1
  22271. 1
  22272. 1
  22273. 1
  22274. 1
  22275. 1
  22276. 1
  22277. 1
  22278. 1
  22279. 1
  22280. 1
  22281. 1
  22282. 1
  22283. 1
  22284. 1
  22285. ​From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    1
  22286. 1
  22287. 1
  22288. 1
  22289. 1
  22290. 1
  22291. 1
  22292. 1
  22293. 1
  22294. 1
  22295. 1
  22296. 1
  22297. 1
  22298. 1
  22299. 1
  22300. 1
  22301. 1
  22302. 1
  22303. 1
  22304. 1
  22305. 1
  22306. 1
  22307. 1
  22308. 1
  22309. 1
  22310. 1
  22311. 1
  22312. 1
  22313. 1
  22314. 1
  22315. 1
  22316. 1
  22317. 1
  22318. 1
  22319. 1
  22320. 1
  22321. 1
  22322. 1
  22323. 1
  22324. 1
  22325. 1
  22326. 1
  22327. 1
  22328. 1
  22329. 1
  22330. 1
  22331. 1
  22332. 1
  22333. 1
  22334. 1
  22335. 1
  22336. 1
  22337. 1
  22338. 1
  22339. 1
  22340. 1
  22341. 1
  22342. 1
  22343. 1
  22344. 1
  22345. 1
  22346. 1
  22347. 1
  22348. 1
  22349. 1
  22350. 1
  22351. 1
  22352. 1
  22353. 1
  22354. 1
  22355. 1
  22356. 1
  22357. 1
  22358. 1
  22359. 1
  22360. 1
  22361. 1
  22362. 1
  22363. 1
  22364. 1
  22365. 1
  22366. 1
  22367. 1
  22368. 1
  22369. 1
  22370. 1
  22371. 1
  22372. 1
  22373. 1
  22374. 1
  22375. 1
  22376. 1
  22377. 1
  22378. 1
  22379. 1
  22380. 1
  22381. 1
  22382. 1
  22383. 1
  22384. 1
  22385. 1
  22386. 1
  22387. 1
  22388. 1
  22389. 1
  22390. 1
  22391. 1
  22392. 1
  22393. 1
  22394. 1
  22395. 1
  22396. 1
  22397. 1
  22398. 1
  22399. 1
  22400. 1
  22401. 1
  22402. 1
  22403. 1
  22404. 1
  22405. 1
  22406. 1
  22407. 1
  22408. 1
  22409. 1
  22410. 1
  22411. 1
  22412. 1
  22413. 1
  22414. 1
  22415. 1
  22416. 1
  22417. 1
  22418. 1
  22419. 1
  22420. 1
  22421. 1
  22422. 1
  22423. 1
  22424. 1
  22425. 1
  22426. 1
  22427. 1
  22428. 1
  22429. 1
  22430. 1
  22431. 1
  22432. 1
  22433. 1
  22434. 1
  22435. 1
  22436. 1
  22437. 1
  22438. 1
  22439. 1
  22440. 1
  22441. 1
  22442. 1
  22443. 1
  22444. 1
  22445. 1
  22446. 1
  22447. 1
  22448. 1
  22449. 1
  22450. 1
  22451. 1
  22452. 1
  22453. 1
  22454. 1
  22455. 1
  22456. 1
  22457. 1
  22458. 1
  22459. 1
  22460. 1
  22461. 1
  22462. 1
  22463. 1
  22464. 1
  22465. 1
  22466. 1
  22467. 1
  22468. 1
  22469. 1
  22470. 1
  22471. 1
  22472. 1
  22473. 1
  22474. 1
  22475. 1
  22476. 1
  22477. 1
  22478. 1
  22479. 1
  22480. 1
  22481. 1
  22482. 1
  22483. 1
  22484. 1
  22485. 1
  22486. 1
  22487. 1
  22488. 1
  22489. 1
  22490. 1
  22491. 1
  22492. 1
  22493. 1
  22494. 1
  22495. 1
  22496. 1
  22497. 1
  22498. 1
  22499. 1
  22500. 1
  22501. 1
  22502. 1
  22503. 1
  22504. 1
  22505. 1
  22506. 1
  22507. 1
  22508. 1
  22509. 1
  22510. 1
  22511. 1
  22512. 1
  22513. 1
  22514. 1
  22515. 1
  22516. 1
  22517. 1
  22518. 1
  22519. 1
  22520. 1
  22521. 1
  22522. 1
  22523. 1
  22524. 1
  22525. 1
  22526. 1
  22527. 1
  22528. 1
  22529. 1
  22530. 1
  22531. 1
  22532. 1
  22533. 1
  22534. 1
  22535. 1
  22536. 1
  22537. 1
  22538. 1
  22539. 1
  22540. 1
  22541. 1
  22542. 1
  22543. 1
  22544. 1
  22545. 1
  22546. 1
  22547. 1
  22548. 1
  22549. 1
  22550. 1
  22551. 1
  22552. 1
  22553. 1
  22554. 1
  22555. 1
  22556. 1
  22557. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  22558. 1
  22559. 1
  22560. 1
  22561. 1
  22562. 1
  22563. 1
  22564. 1
  22565. 1
  22566. 1
  22567. 1
  22568. 1
  22569. 1
  22570. 1
  22571. 1
  22572. 1
  22573. 1
  22574. 1
  22575. 1
  22576. 1
  22577. 1
  22578. 1
  22579. 1
  22580. 1
  22581. 1
  22582. 1
  22583. 1
  22584. 1
  22585. 1
  22586. 1
  22587. 1
  22588. 1
  22589. 1
  22590. 1
  22591. 1
  22592. 1
  22593. 1
  22594. 1
  22595. 1
  22596. 1
  22597. 1
  22598. 1
  22599. 1
  22600. 1
  22601. 1
  22602. 1
  22603. 1
  22604. 1
  22605. 1
  22606. 1
  22607. 1
  22608. 1
  22609. 1
  22610. 1
  22611. 1
  22612. 1
  22613. 1
  22614. 1
  22615. 1
  22616. 1
  22617. 1
  22618. 1
  22619. 1
  22620. 1
  22621. 1
  22622. 1
  22623. 1
  22624. 1
  22625. 1
  22626. 1
  22627. 1
  22628. 1
  22629. 1
  22630. 1
  22631. 1
  22632. 1
  22633. 1
  22634. 1
  22635. 1
  22636. 1
  22637. 1
  22638. 1
  22639. 1
  22640. 1
  22641. 1
  22642. 1
  22643. 1
  22644. 1
  22645. 1
  22646. 1
  22647. 1
  22648. 1
  22649. 1
  22650. 1
  22651. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  22652. 1
  22653. 1
  22654. 1
  22655. 1
  22656. 1
  22657. 1
  22658. 1
  22659. 1
  22660. 1
  22661. 1
  22662. 1
  22663. 1
  22664. 1
  22665. 1
  22666. 1
  22667. 1
  22668. 1
  22669. 1
  22670. 1
  22671. 1
  22672. 1
  22673. 1
  22674. 1
  22675. 1
  22676. 1
  22677. 1
  22678. 1
  22679. 1
  22680. 1
  22681. 1
  22682. 1
  22683. 1
  22684. 1
  22685. 1
  22686. 1
  22687. 1
  22688. 1
  22689. 1
  22690. 1
  22691. 1
  22692. 1
  22693. 1
  22694. 1
  22695. 1
  22696. 1
  22697. 1
  22698. 1
  22699. 1
  22700. 1
  22701. 1
  22702. 1
  22703. 1
  22704. 1
  22705. 1
  22706. 1
  22707. 1
  22708. 1
  22709. 1
  22710. 1
  22711. 1
  22712. 1
  22713. 1
  22714. 1
  22715. 1
  22716. 1
  22717. 1
  22718. 1
  22719. 1
  22720. 1
  22721. 1
  22722. 1
  22723. 1
  22724. 1
  22725. 1
  22726. 1
  22727. 1
  22728. 1
  22729. 1
  22730. 1
  22731. 1
  22732. 1
  22733. 1
  22734. 1
  22735. 1
  22736. 1
  22737. 1
  22738. 1
  22739. 1
  22740. 1
  22741. 1
  22742. 1
  22743. 1
  22744. 1
  22745. 1
  22746. 1
  22747. 1
  22748. 1
  22749. 1
  22750. 1
  22751. 1
  22752. 1
  22753. 1
  22754. 1
  22755. 1
  22756. 1
  22757. 1
  22758. 1
  22759. 1
  22760. 1
  22761. 1
  22762. 1
  22763. 1
  22764. 1
  22765. 1
  22766. 1
  22767. 1
  22768. 1
  22769. 1
  22770. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  22771. 1
  22772. 1
  22773. 1
  22774. 1
  22775. 1
  22776. 1
  22777. 1
  22778. 1
  22779. 1
  22780. 1
  22781. 1
  22782. 1
  22783. 1
  22784. 1
  22785. 1
  22786. 1
  22787. 1
  22788. 1
  22789. 1
  22790. 1
  22791. 1
  22792. 1
  22793. 1
  22794. 1
  22795. 1
  22796. 1
  22797. 1
  22798. 1
  22799. 1
  22800. 1
  22801. 1
  22802. 1
  22803. 1
  22804. 1
  22805. 1
  22806. 1
  22807. 1
  22808. 1
  22809. 1
  22810. 1
  22811. 1
  22812. 1
  22813. 1
  22814. 1
  22815. 1
  22816. 1
  22817. 1
  22818. 1
  22819. 1
  22820. 1
  22821. 1
  22822. 1
  22823. 1
  22824. 1
  22825. 1
  22826. 1
  22827. 1
  22828. 1
  22829. 1
  22830. 1
  22831. 1
  22832. 1
  22833. 1
  22834. 1
  22835. 1
  22836. 1
  22837. 1
  22838. 1
  22839. 1
  22840. 1
  22841. 1
  22842. 1
  22843. 1
  22844. 1
  22845. 1
  22846. 1
  22847. 1
  22848. 1
  22849. 1
  22850. 1
  22851. 1
  22852. 1
  22853. 1
  22854. 1
  22855. 1
  22856. 1
  22857. 1
  22858. 1
  22859. 1
  22860. 1
  22861. 1
  22862. 1
  22863. 1
  22864. 1
  22865. 1
  22866. 1
  22867. 1
  22868. 1
  22869. 1
  22870. 1
  22871.  @Met377  BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    1
  22872. 1
  22873. 1
  22874. 1
  22875. 1
  22876. 1
  22877. 1
  22878. 1
  22879. 1
  22880. 1
  22881. 1
  22882. 1
  22883. 1
  22884. 1
  22885. 1
  22886. 1
  22887. 1
  22888. 1
  22889. 1
  22890. 1
  22891. 1
  22892. 1
  22893. 1
  22894. 1
  22895. 1
  22896. 1
  22897. 1
  22898. 1
  22899. 1
  22900. 1
  22901. 1
  22902. 1
  22903. 1
  22904. 1
  22905. 1
  22906. 1
  22907. 1
  22908. 1
  22909. 1
  22910. 1
  22911. 1
  22912. 1
  22913. 1
  22914. 1
  22915. 1
  22916. 1
  22917. 1
  22918. 1
  22919. 1
  22920. 1
  22921. 1
  22922. 1
  22923. 1
  22924. 1
  22925. 1
  22926. 1
  22927. 1
  22928. 1
  22929. 1
  22930. 1
  22931. 1
  22932. 1
  22933. 1
  22934. 1
  22935. 1
  22936. 1
  22937. 1
  22938. 1
  22939. 1
  22940. 1
  22941. 1
  22942. 1
  22943. 1
  22944. 1
  22945. 1
  22946. 1
  22947. 1
  22948. 1
  22949. 1
  22950. 1
  22951. 1
  22952. 1
  22953. 1
  22954. 1
  22955. 1
  22956. 1
  22957. 1
  22958. 1
  22959. 1
  22960. 1
  22961. 1
  22962. 1
  22963. 1
  22964. 1
  22965. 1
  22966. 1
  22967. 1
  22968. 1
  22969. 1
  22970. 1
  22971. 1
  22972. 1
  22973. 1
  22974. 1
  22975. 1
  22976. 1
  22977. 1
  22978. 1
  22979. 1
  22980. 1
  22981. 1
  22982. 1
  22983. 1
  22984. 1
  22985. 1
  22986. 1
  22987. 1
  22988. 1
  22989. 1
  22990. 1
  22991. 1
  22992. 1
  22993. 1
  22994. 1
  22995. 1
  22996. 1
  22997. 1
  22998. 1
  22999. 1
  23000. 1
  23001. 1
  23002. 1
  23003. 1
  23004. 1
  23005. 1
  23006. 1
  23007. 1
  23008. 1
  23009. 1
  23010. 1
  23011. 1
  23012. 1
  23013. 1
  23014. 1
  23015. 1
  23016. 1
  23017. 1
  23018. 1
  23019. 1
  23020. 1
  23021. 1
  23022. 1
  23023. 1
  23024. 1
  23025. 1
  23026. 1
  23027. 1
  23028. 1
  23029. 1
  23030. 1
  23031. 1
  23032. 1
  23033. 1
  23034. 1
  23035. 1
  23036. 1
  23037. 1
  23038. 1
  23039. UN : Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    1
  23040. 1
  23041. 1
  23042. 1
  23043. 1
  23044. 1
  23045. 1
  23046. 1
  23047. 1
  23048. 1
  23049. 1
  23050. 1
  23051. 1
  23052. 1
  23053. 1
  23054. 1
  23055. 1
  23056. 1
  23057. 1
  23058. 1
  23059. 1
  23060. 1
  23061. 1
  23062. 1
  23063. 1
  23064. 1
  23065. 1
  23066. 1
  23067. 1
  23068. 1
  23069. 1
  23070. 1
  23071. 1
  23072. 1
  23073. 1
  23074. 1
  23075. 1
  23076. 1
  23077. 1
  23078. 1
  23079. 1
  23080. 1
  23081. 1
  23082. 1
  23083. 1
  23084. 1
  23085. 1
  23086. 1
  23087. 1
  23088. 1
  23089. 1
  23090. 1
  23091. 1
  23092. 1
  23093. 1
  23094. 1
  23095. 1
  23096. 1
  23097. 1
  23098. 1
  23099. 1
  23100. 1
  23101. 1
  23102. 1
  23103. 1
  23104. 1
  23105. 1
  23106. 1
  23107. 1
  23108. 1
  23109. 1
  23110. 1
  23111. 1
  23112. 1
  23113. 1
  23114. 1
  23115. 1
  23116. 1
  23117. 1
  23118. Olaf Scholz visit to China stirs up controversy but emphasizes cooperation. The political circles evaluate Scholz's visit to China this time as actually further strengthening economic relations and are more harmonious. His return to China after completing his visit to China aroused widespread controversy and criticism in German political and economic circles. On the one hand, the Green Party, which is ideologically anti-China, and the Free Democratic Party, which mainly represents small and medium-sized enterprises, accused his visit being threaten by 12 CEOs of big companies to kowtow China to seek benefits. However, within the Social Democratic Party, the extreme right and the extreme left supported Scholz's trip, believing that it could stabilize the precarious German economy; there were also strong public voices supporting his trip, believing that it would express to the world that Germany and China had established a Consensus, efforts should be made to end the Russia-Ukraine war. Since the Green Party and the Liberal Democratic Party take a pro-American stance and believe that China exports a large number of state-subsidized goods to the EU, such as electric vehicles and green energy technology products, the political and economic stance on China within the coalition government is divided. German automakers Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Volkswagen, as well as companies such as Siemens and Bayer insist on moving closer to China. However, since 2018, German small and medium-sized enterprises have been increasingly threatened by powerful Chinese competitors and have tended to support the government's implementation of protective policies and "decouple" starts again. However, the German government has decided to pursue the policy of "de-risking" rather than "decouple" with China established last year. It also recognizes that China is more important to Germany than Germany is to China.
    1
  23119. 1
  23120. 1
  23121. 1
  23122. 1
  23123. 1
  23124. 1
  23125. 1
  23126. 1
  23127. 1
  23128. 1
  23129. 1
  23130. 1
  23131. 1
  23132. 1
  23133. 1
  23134. 1
  23135. 1
  23136. 1
  23137. 1
  23138. 1
  23139. 1
  23140. 1
  23141. 1
  23142. 1
  23143. 1
  23144. 1
  23145. 1
  23146. 1
  23147. 1
  23148. 1
  23149. 1
  23150. June 21, 2023 President Biden has declared “the battle between democracy and autocracy” to be the defining struggle of his time. But when he rolls out the red carpet on the South Lawn of the White House for Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India on Thursday morning, Mr. Biden will effectively call a temporary truce. In granting Mr. Modi a coveted state visit, complete with a star-studded gala dinner, Mr. Biden will shower attention on a leader presiding over democratic backsliding in the world’s most populous nation. Mr. Modi’s government has cracked down on dissent and hounded opponents in a way that has raised fears of an authoritarian turn not seen since India’s slip into dictatorship in the 1970s. Yet Mr. Biden has concluded, much as his predecessors did, that he needs India despite concerns over human rights just as he believes he needs Saudi Arabia, the Philippines and other countries that are either outright autocracies or do not fit into the category of ideal democracies. At a time of confrontation with Russia and an uneasy standoff with China, Mr. Biden is being forced to accept the flaws of America’s friends. Two and a half years into his administration, the democracy-versus-autocracy framework has, therefore, become something of a geopolitical straitjacket for Mr. Biden, one that conveys little of the subtleties his foreign policy actually envisions yet virtually guarantees criticism every time he shakes hands with a counterpart who does not pass the George Washington test. Even some of his top advisers privately view the construct as too black-and-white in a world of grays. “Any time a president dresses up his foreign policy in the language of values, any concession to geopolitical reality inevitably elicits cries of hypocrisy,” said Hal Brands, a professor of global affairs at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. “The reality, of course, is that every U.S. president — including the ones most devoted to democracy and human rights — realized that there were some relationships that were just too strategically important to hold hostage to concerns about democratic values.” The dynamic, which has played out repeatedly, has become a wearying topic for some top administration officials. The democracy slogan, they said, never fully captured a more textured strategy that goes well beyond dividing the world into two opposing camps. It was more about recognizing the growing global drift away from freedom and the threats posed by more aggressive powers like Russia and China.
    1
  23151. 1
  23152. 1
  23153. 1
  23154. 1
  23155. 1
  23156. 1
  23157. 1
  23158. 1
  23159. 1
  23160. 1
  23161. 1
  23162. 1
  23163. 1
  23164. 1
  23165. 1
  23166. 1
  23167. 1
  23168. 1
  23169. 1
  23170. 1
  23171. 1
  23172. 1
  23173. 1
  23174. 1
  23175. 1
  23176. 1
  23177. 1
  23178. 1
  23179. 1
  23180. 1
  23181. 1
  23182. 1
  23183. 1
  23184. 1
  23185. 1
  23186. 1
  23187. 1
  23188. 1
  23189. 1
  23190. 1
  23191. 1
  23192. 1
  23193. 1
  23194. 1
  23195. 1
  23196. 1
  23197. 1
  23198. 1
  23199. 1
  23200. 1
  23201. 1
  23202. 1
  23203. 1
  23204. 1
  23205. 1
  23206. 1
  23207. 1
  23208. 1
  23209. 1
  23210. 1
  23211. 1
  23212. 1
  23213. 1
  23214. 1
  23215. 1
  23216. 1
  23217. 1
  23218. 1
  23219. 1
  23220. 1
  23221. 1
  23222. 1
  23223. 1
  23224. 1
  23225. 1
  23226. 1
  23227. 1
  23228. 1
  23229. 1
  23230. 1
  23231. 1
  23232. 1
  23233. 1
  23234. 1
  23235. 1
  23236. 1
  23237. 1
  23238. 1
  23239. 1
  23240. 1
  23241. 1
  23242. 1
  23243. 1
  23244. 1
  23245. 1
  23246. 1
  23247. 1
  23248. 1
  23249. 1
  23250. 1
  23251. 1
  23252. 1
  23253. 1
  23254. 1
  23255. 1
  23256. 1
  23257. 1
  23258. 1
  23259. 1
  23260. 1
  23261. 1
  23262. 1
  23263. 1
  23264. 1
  23265. 1
  23266. 1
  23267. 1
  23268. 1
  23269. 1
  23270. 1
  23271. 1
  23272. 1
  23273. 1
  23274. 1
  23275. 1
  23276. 1
  23277. 1
  23278. 1
  23279. 1
  23280. 1
  23281. 1
  23282. 1
  23283. 1
  23284. 1
  23285. 1
  23286. 1
  23287. 1
  23288. 1
  23289. 1
  23290. 1
  23291. 1
  23292. 1
  23293. 1
  23294. 1
  23295. 1
  23296. 1
  23297. 1
  23298. 1
  23299. 1
  23300. 1
  23301. 1
  23302. 1
  23303. 1
  23304. 1
  23305. 1
  23306. 1
  23307. 1
  23308. 1
  23309. 1
  23310. 1
  23311. 1
  23312. 1
  23313. 1
  23314. 1
  23315. 1
  23316. 1
  23317. 1
  23318. 1
  23319. 1
  23320. 1
  23321. 1
  23322. 1
  23323. 1
  23324. 1
  23325. 1
  23326. 1
  23327. 1
  23328. 1
  23329. 1
  23330. 1
  23331. 1
  23332. 1
  23333. 1
  23334. 1
  23335. 1
  23336. 1
  23337. 1
  23338. 1
  23339. 1
  23340. 1
  23341. 1
  23342. 1
  23343. 1
  23344. 1
  23345. 1
  23346. 1
  23347. 1
  23348. 1
  23349. 1
  23350. 1
  23351. 1
  23352. 1
  23353. 1
  23354. 1
  23355. 1
  23356. 1
  23357. 1
  23358. 1
  23359. 1
  23360. 1
  23361. 1
  23362. 1
  23363. 1
  23364. 1
  23365. 1
  23366. 1
  23367. 1
  23368. 1
  23369. 1
  23370. 1
  23371. 1
  23372. 1
  23373. 1
  23374. 1
  23375. 1
  23376. 1
  23377. 1
  23378. 1
  23379. 1
  23380. 1
  23381. 1
  23382. 1
  23383. 1
  23384. 1
  23385. 1
  23386. 1
  23387. 1
  23388. 1
  23389. 1
  23390. 1
  23391. 1
  23392. 1
  23393. 1
  23394. 1
  23395. 1
  23396. 1
  23397. 1
  23398. 1
  23399. 1
  23400. 1
  23401. 1
  23402. 1
  23403. 1
  23404. 1
  23405. 1
  23406. 1
  23407. 1
  23408. 1
  23409. 1
  23410. 1
  23411. 1
  23412. 1
  23413. 1
  23414. 1
  23415. 1
  23416. 1
  23417. 1
  23418. 1
  23419. 1
  23420. 1
  23421. 1
  23422. 1
  23423. 1
  23424. 1
  23425. 1
  23426. 1
  23427. 1
  23428. 1
  23429. 1
  23430. 1
  23431. 1
  23432. 1
  23433. 1
  23434. 1
  23435. 1
  23436. 1
  23437. 1
  23438. 1
  23439. 1
  23440. 1
  23441. 1
  23442. 1
  23443. 1
  23444. 1
  23445. 1
  23446. 1
  23447. 1
  23448. 1
  23449. 1
  23450. 1
  23451. 1
  23452. 1
  23453. 1
  23454. 1
  23455. 1
  23456. 1
  23457. 1
  23458. 1
  23459. 1
  23460. 1
  23461. 1
  23462. 1
  23463. 1
  23464. 1
  23465. 1
  23466. 1
  23467. 1
  23468. 1
  23469. 1
  23470. 1
  23471. 1
  23472. 1
  23473. 1
  23474. 1
  23475. 1
  23476. 1
  23477. 1
  23478. 1
  23479. 1
  23480. 1
  23481. 1
  23482. 1
  23483. 1
  23484. 1
  23485. 1
  23486. 1
  23487. 1
  23488. 1
  23489. 1
  23490. 1
  23491. 1
  23492. 1
  23493. 1
  23494. 1
  23495. 1
  23496. 1
  23497. 1
  23498. 1
  23499. 1
  23500. 1
  23501. 1
  23502. 1
  23503. 1
  23504. 1
  23505. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  23506. 1
  23507. 1
  23508. 1
  23509. 1
  23510. 1
  23511. 1
  23512. 1
  23513. 1
  23514. 1
  23515. 1
  23516. 1
  23517. 1
  23518. 1
  23519. 1
  23520. 1
  23521. 1
  23522. 1
  23523. 1
  23524. 1
  23525. 1
  23526. 1
  23527. 1
  23528. 1
  23529. 😆😆😆 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  23530. 1
  23531. 1
  23532. 1
  23533. 1
  23534. 1
  23535. 1
  23536. 1
  23537. 1
  23538. 1
  23539. 1
  23540. 1
  23541. 1
  23542. 1
  23543. 1
  23544. 1
  23545. 1
  23546. 1
  23547. 1
  23548. 1
  23549. 1
  23550. 1
  23551. 1
  23552. 1
  23553. 1
  23554. 1
  23555. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  23556. 1
  23557. 1
  23558. 1
  23559. 1
  23560. 1
  23561. 1
  23562. 1
  23563. 1
  23564. 1
  23565. 1
  23566. 1
  23567. 1
  23568. 1
  23569. 1
  23570. 1
  23571. 1
  23572. 1
  23573. 1
  23574. 1
  23575. 1
  23576. 1
  23577. 1
  23578. 1
  23579. 1
  23580. 1
  23581. 1
  23582. 1
  23583. 1
  23584. 1
  23585. 1
  23586. 1
  23587. 1
  23588. 1
  23589. 1
  23590. 1
  23591. 1
  23592. This British elite realism on where power actually flows is in no way confined to those Democrat-aligned British progressives. It’s reflected across the political spectrum, and acted on too: Nigel Farage, for example, announced last week that he’s not even bothering to stand in this election. “Important though the general election is,” he wrote, “the contest in the United States of America on November 5 has huge global significance”. As a result, Farage plans to “help with the grassroots campaign in America”. Why waste energy on a provincial contest when the big time is calling? The real election is the imperial one, and the former Ukip leader has parlayed his modest success in provincial politics into a role of some kind on the battlefield that actually matters. We can make two inferences from this. Firstly, that these “presidential” airs and graces increasingly affected by Britain’s would-be leaders have a cargo-cult quality. In seeking to inject energy and independence into this election, by adopting this culturally very alien styling, it succeeds mainly in acknowledging Britain’s vassal-state reality. And secondly, we can infer that Farage is right. What happens on 5 November is hugely significant, not just for 50 states but for the 51st one too — and by extension for the rest of the imperial provinces. Will the world get “dormant Nato” or another four years of LGBT imperialism? Next to this question, the current contest between would-be provincial governors pales into insignificance — no matter how slavishly they imitate the register of the imperial centre.
    1
  23593. 1
  23594. 1
  23595. 1
  23596. 1
  23597. 1
  23598. 1
  23599. 1
  23600. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  23601. 1
  23602. 1
  23603. 1
  23604. 1
  23605. 1
  23606. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  23607. 1
  23608. 1
  23609. 1
  23610. 1
  23611. 1
  23612. 1
  23613. 1
  23614. 1
  23615. 1
  23616. 1
  23617. 1
  23618. 1
  23619. 1
  23620. 1
  23621. 1
  23622. 1
  23623. 1
  23624. 1
  23625. 1
  23626. 1
  23627. 1
  23628. 1
  23629. 1
  23630. 1
  23631. 1
  23632. 1
  23633. 1
  23634. 1
  23635. 1
  23636. 1
  23637. 1
  23638. 1
  23639. 1
  23640. 1
  23641. 1
  23642. 1
  23643. 1
  23644. 1
  23645. 1
  23646. 1
  23647. 1
  23648. 1
  23649. 1
  23650. 1
  23651. 1
  23652. 1
  23653. 1
  23654. 1
  23655. 1
  23656. 1
  23657. 1
  23658. 1
  23659. 1
  23660. 1
  23661. 1
  23662. 1
  23663. 1
  23664. 1
  23665. 1
  23666. 1
  23667. 1
  23668. 1
  23669. 1
  23670. 1
  23671. 1
  23672. 1
  23673. 1
  23674. 1
  23675. 1
  23676. 1
  23677. 1
  23678. 1
  23679. 1
  23680. 1
  23681. 1
  23682. 1
  23683. 1
  23684. 1
  23685. 1
  23686. 1
  23687. 1
  23688. 1
  23689. 1
  23690. 1
  23691. 1
  23692. 1
  23693. 1
  23694. 1
  23695. 1
  23696. 1
  23697. 1
  23698. 1
  23699. 1
  23700. 1
  23701. 1
  23702. 1
  23703. 1
  23704. 1
  23705. 1
  23706. 1
  23707. 1
  23708. 1
  23709. 1
  23710. 1
  23711. 1
  23712. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  23713. 1
  23714. 1
  23715. 1
  23716. 1
  23717. 1
  23718. 1
  23719. 1
  23720. 1
  23721. 1
  23722. 1
  23723. 1
  23724. 1
  23725. 1
  23726. 1
  23727. 1
  23728. 1
  23729. 1
  23730. 1
  23731. 1
  23732. 1
  23733. 1
  23734. 1
  23735. 1
  23736. 1
  23737. 1
  23738. 1
  23739. 1
  23740. 1
  23741. 1
  23742. 1
  23743. 1
  23744. 1
  23745. 1
  23746. 1
  23747. 1
  23748. 1
  23749. 1
  23750. 1
  23751. 1
  23752. 1
  23753. 1
  23754. 1
  23755. 1
  23756. 1
  23757. 1
  23758. 1
  23759. 1
  23760. 1
  23761. 1
  23762. 1
  23763. 1
  23764. 1
  23765. 1
  23766. 1
  23767. 1
  23768. 1
  23769. 1
  23770. 1
  23771. 1
  23772. 1
  23773. 1
  23774. 1
  23775. 1
  23776. 1
  23777. 1
  23778. 1
  23779. 1
  23780. 1
  23781. 1
  23782. 1
  23783. 1
  23784. 1
  23785. 1
  23786. 1
  23787. 1
  23788. 1
  23789. 1
  23790. 1
  23791. 1
  23792. 1
  23793. 1
  23794. 1
  23795. 1
  23796. 1
  23797. 1
  23798. 1
  23799. 1
  23800. 1
  23801. 1
  23802. 1
  23803. 1
  23804. 1
  23805. 1
  23806. 1
  23807. 1
  23808. 1
  23809. 1
  23810. 1
  23811. 1
  23812. 1
  23813. 1
  23814. 1
  23815. 1
  23816. 1
  23817. 1
  23818. 1
  23819. 1
  23820. 1
  23821. 1
  23822. 1
  23823. 1
  23824. 1
  23825. 1
  23826. 1
  23827. 1
  23828. 1
  23829. 1
  23830. 1
  23831. 1
  23832. 1
  23833. 1
  23834. 1
  23835. 1
  23836. 1
  23837. 1
  23838. 1
  23839. 1
  23840. 1
  23841. 1
  23842. 1
  23843. 1
  23844. 1
  23845. 1
  23846. 1
  23847. 1
  23848. 1
  23849. 1
  23850. 1
  23851. 1
  23852. 1
  23853. 1
  23854. 1
  23855. 1
  23856. 1
  23857. 1
  23858. 1
  23859. 1
  23860. 1
  23861. 1
  23862. 1
  23863. 1
  23864. 1
  23865. 1
  23866. 1
  23867. 1
  23868. 1
  23869. 1
  23870. 1
  23871. 1
  23872. 1
  23873. 1
  23874. 1
  23875. 1
  23876. 1
  23877. 1
  23878. 1
  23879. 1
  23880. 1
  23881. 1
  23882. 1
  23883. 1
  23884. 1
  23885. 1
  23886. 1
  23887. 1
  23888. 1
  23889. 1
  23890. 1
  23891. 1
  23892. 1
  23893. 1
  23894. 1
  23895. 1
  23896. 1
  23897. 1
  23898. 1
  23899. 1
  23900. 1
  23901. 1
  23902. 1
  23903. ​ From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    1
  23904. 1
  23905. 1
  23906. 1
  23907. 1
  23908. 1
  23909. 1
  23910. 1
  23911. 1
  23912. 1
  23913. 1
  23914. 1
  23915. 1
  23916. 1
  23917. 1
  23918. 1
  23919. 1
  23920. 1
  23921. 1
  23922. 1
  23923. 1
  23924. 1
  23925. 1
  23926. 1
  23927. 1
  23928. 1
  23929. 1
  23930. 1
  23931. 1
  23932. 1
  23933. 1
  23934. 1
  23935. 1
  23936. 1
  23937. 1
  23938. 1
  23939. 1
  23940. 1
  23941. 1
  23942. 1
  23943. 1
  23944. 1
  23945. 1
  23946. 1
  23947. 1
  23948. 1
  23949. 1
  23950. 1
  23951. 1
  23952. 1
  23953. 1
  23954. 1
  23955. 1
  23956. 1
  23957. 1
  23958. 1
  23959. 1
  23960. 1
  23961. 1
  23962. 1
  23963. 1
  23964. 1
  23965. 1
  23966. 1
  23967. 1
  23968. 1
  23969. 1
  23970. 1
  23971. 1
  23972. 1
  23973. 1
  23974. 1
  23975. 1
  23976. 1
  23977. 1
  23978. 1
  23979. 1
  23980. 1
  23981. 1
  23982. 1
  23983. 1
  23984. 1
  23985. 1
  23986. 1
  23987. 1
  23988. 1
  23989. 1
  23990. 1
  23991. 1
  23992. 1
  23993. 1
  23994. 1
  23995. 1
  23996. 1
  23997. 1
  23998. 1
  23999. 1
  24000. 1
  24001. 1
  24002. 1
  24003. 1
  24004. 1
  24005. 1
  24006. 1
  24007. 1
  24008. 1
  24009. 1
  24010. 1
  24011. 1
  24012. 1
  24013. 1
  24014. 1
  24015. 1
  24016. 1
  24017. 1
  24018. 1
  24019. 1
  24020. 1
  24021. 1
  24022. 1
  24023. 1
  24024. 1
  24025. 1
  24026. 1
  24027. 1
  24028. 1
  24029. 1
  24030. 1
  24031. 1
  24032. 1
  24033. 1
  24034. 1
  24035. 1
  24036. 1
  24037. 1
  24038. 1
  24039. 1
  24040. 1
  24041. 1
  24042. 1
  24043. 1
  24044. 1
  24045. 1
  24046. 1
  24047. 1
  24048. 1
  24049. 1
  24050. 1
  24051. 1
  24052. 1
  24053. 1
  24054. 1
  24055. 1
  24056. 1
  24057. 1
  24058. 1
  24059. 1
  24060. 1
  24061. 1
  24062. 1
  24063. 1
  24064. 1
  24065. 1
  24066. 1
  24067. 1
  24068. 1
  24069. 1
  24070. 1
  24071. 1
  24072. 1
  24073. 1
  24074. 1
  24075. 1
  24076. 1
  24077. 1
  24078. 1
  24079. 1
  24080. 1
  24081. 1
  24082. 1
  24083. 1
  24084. 1
  24085. 1
  24086. 1
  24087. 1
  24088. 1
  24089. 1
  24090. 1
  24091. 1
  24092. 1
  24093. 1
  24094. 1
  24095. 1
  24096. 1
  24097. 1
  24098. 1
  24099. 1
  24100. 1
  24101. 1
  24102. 1
  24103. 1
  24104. 1
  24105. 1
  24106. 1
  24107. 1
  24108. 1
  24109. 1
  24110. 1
  24111. 1
  24112. 1
  24113. 1
  24114. 1
  24115. 1
  24116. 1
  24117. 1
  24118. 1
  24119. 1
  24120. 1
  24121. 1
  24122. 1
  24123. 1
  24124. 1
  24125. 1
  24126. 1
  24127. 1
  24128. 1
  24129. 1
  24130. 1
  24131. 1
  24132. 1
  24133. 1
  24134. 1
  24135. 1
  24136. 1
  24137. 1
  24138. 1
  24139. 1
  24140. 1
  24141. 1
  24142. 1
  24143. 1
  24144. ‘China threat’ needed to feed the insatiable US military-industrial complex Without an ‘enemy’, no taxpayer would fork out an average US$1,087 for Pentagon contractors over US$270 for their children’s subpar education More than 60 years after Eisenhower identified the problem and gave it a name, the military-industrial complex continues to use its unprecedented influence to corrupt budget and policy processes, starve funding for non-military solutions to security problems, and ensure that war is the ever more likely “solution” to this country’s problems. The question is: What can be done to reduce its power over our lives, our livelihoods, and ultimately, the future of the planet? Countering the modern-day military-industrial complex would mean dislodging each of the major pillars undergirding its power and influence. That would involve campaign-finance reform; curbing the revolving door between the weapons industry and government; shedding more light on its funding of political campaigns, think tanks, and Hollywood; and prioritizing investments in the jobs of the future in green technology and public health instead of piling up ever more weapons systems. Most important of all, perhaps, a broad-based public education campaign is needed to promote more realistic views of the challenge posed by China and to counter the current climate of fear that serves the interests of the Pentagon and the giant weapons contractors at the expense of the safety and security of the rest of us.
    1
  24145. 1
  24146. 1
  24147. 1
  24148. 1
  24149. 1
  24150. 1
  24151. 1
  24152. 1
  24153. 1
  24154. 1
  24155. 1
  24156. 1
  24157. 1
  24158. 1
  24159. 1
  24160. 1
  24161. 1
  24162. 1
  24163. 1
  24164. 1
  24165. 1
  24166. 1
  24167. 1
  24168. 1
  24169. 1
  24170. 1
  24171. 1
  24172. 1
  24173. 1
  24174. 1
  24175. 1
  24176. 1
  24177. 1
  24178. 1
  24179. 1
  24180. 1
  24181. 1
  24182. 1
  24183. 1
  24184. 1
  24185. 1
  24186. 1
  24187. 1
  24188. 1
  24189. 1
  24190. 1
  24191. 1
  24192. 1
  24193. 1
  24194. 1
  24195. 1
  24196. 1
  24197. 1
  24198. 1
  24199. 1
  24200. 1
  24201. 1
  24202. 1
  24203. 1
  24204. 1
  24205. 1
  24206. 1
  24207. 1
  24208. 1
  24209. 1
  24210. 1
  24211. 1
  24212. 1
  24213. 1
  24214. 1
  24215. 1
  24216. 1
  24217. 1
  24218. 1
  24219. 1
  24220. 1
  24221. 1
  24222. 1
  24223. 1
  24224. 1
  24225. 1
  24226. 1
  24227. 1
  24228. 1
  24229. 1
  24230. 1
  24231. 1
  24232. 1
  24233. 1
  24234. 1
  24235. 1
  24236. 1
  24237. 1
  24238. 1
  24239. 1
  24240. 1
  24241. 1
  24242. 1
  24243. 1
  24244. 1
  24245. 1
  24246. 1
  24247. 1
  24248. 1
  24249. To compete with the Airbus A320-NEO, the Max had larger engines than previous 737 models. They were designed for greater range and fuel efficiency but came with a tradeoff. Since the 737 sits so low to the ground, Boeing had to change the position of the engines on the wing to give the plane ground clearance and account for the extended length of the fuselage. But by solving an old problem, Boeing created a new one. The new engines were too big to fit in their traditional spot under the wings. To combat the problem, Boeing mounted them forward on the wings. Moving the engine position forward shifted the plane’s center of gravity, which altered the aerodynamics of the aircraft. The position of the new engines pulled the 737 tail down, pushed its nose up, and put it at risk of stalling. (Slow air speed and high nose position are the most common causes of stalls. When an aircraft stalls, it begins to fall because the wings stop creating lift.) Boeing installed extra software to make the updated 737 fly like traditional ones. It was designed to prevent stalls, compensate for the position of the engine on the wing, and force the aircraft’s nose down automatically when the sensors determined the airplane was flying at a dangerous angle. The stall-prevention system (known as MCAS) was poorly designed and implemented. Since it was intended to work in the background, Boeing didn’t brief pilots about the software or train them in simulators. The software didn’t activate when the flaps were down or the autopilot was on.³ And when the MCAS system went haywire, pilots could deactivate it with a switch on the center pedestal of the 737 cockpit. As pilots yoked the airplane upwards, the software automatically pushed the aircraft nose back down. This led to the crash of the two Boeing airplanes.
    1
  24250. 1
  24251. 1
  24252. 1
  24253. 1
  24254. 1
  24255. 1
  24256. 1
  24257. 1
  24258. 1
  24259. 1
  24260. 1
  24261. 1
  24262. 1
  24263. 1
  24264. 1
  24265. 1
  24266. 1
  24267. 1
  24268. 1
  24269. 1
  24270. 1
  24271. 1
  24272. 1
  24273. 1
  24274. 1
  24275. 1
  24276. 1
  24277. 1
  24278. 1
  24279. 1
  24280. 1
  24281. 1
  24282. 1
  24283. 1
  24284. 1
  24285. 1
  24286. 1
  24287. 1
  24288. 1
  24289. 1
  24290. 1
  24291. 1
  24292. 1
  24293. 1
  24294. 1
  24295. 1
  24296. 1
  24297. 1
  24298. 1
  24299. 1
  24300. 1
  24301. 1
  24302. 1
  24303. 1
  24304. 1
  24305. 1
  24306. 1
  24307. 1
  24308. 1
  24309. 1
  24310. 1
  24311. 1
  24312. 1
  24313. 1
  24314. 1
  24315. 1
  24316. 1
  24317. 1
  24318. 1
  24319. 1
  24320. 1
  24321. 1
  24322. 1
  24323. 1
  24324. 1
  24325. 1
  24326. 1
  24327. 1
  24328. 1
  24329. 1
  24330. 1
  24331. 1
  24332. 1
  24333. 1
  24334. 1
  24335. 1
  24336. 1
  24337. 1
  24338. 1
  24339. 1
  24340. 1
  24341. 1
  24342. 1
  24343. 1
  24344. 1
  24345. 1
  24346. 1
  24347. 1
  24348. 1
  24349. 1
  24350. 1
  24351. 1
  24352. 1
  24353. 1
  24354. 1
  24355. 1
  24356. 1
  24357. 1
  24358. 1
  24359. 1
  24360. 1
  24361. 1
  24362. 1
  24363. 1
  24364. 1
  24365. 1
  24366. 1
  24367. 1
  24368. 1
  24369. 1
  24370. 1
  24371. 1
  24372. 1
  24373. 1
  24374. 1
  24375. 1
  24376. 1
  24377. 1
  24378. 1
  24379. 1
  24380. 1
  24381. 1
  24382. 1
  24383. 1
  24384. 1
  24385. 1
  24386. 1
  24387. 1
  24388. 1
  24389. 1
  24390. 1
  24391. 1
  24392. 1
  24393. 1
  24394. 1
  24395. 1
  24396. 1
  24397. 1
  24398. 1
  24399. 1
  24400. 1
  24401. 1
  24402. 1
  24403. 1
  24404. 1
  24405. 1
  24406. 1
  24407. 1
  24408. 1
  24409. 1
  24410. 1
  24411. 1
  24412. 1
  24413. 1
  24414. 1
  24415. 1
  24416. 1
  24417. 1
  24418. 1
  24419. 1
  24420. 1
  24421. 1
  24422. 1
  24423. 1
  24424. 1
  24425. 1
  24426. 1
  24427. 1
  24428. 1
  24429. 1
  24430. 1
  24431. 1
  24432. 1
  24433. 1
  24434. 1
  24435. 1
  24436. 1
  24437. 1
  24438. 1
  24439. 1
  24440. 1
  24441. 1
  24442. 1
  24443. 1
  24444. 1
  24445. 1
  24446. 1
  24447. 1
  24448. 1
  24449. 1
  24450. 1
  24451. 1
  24452. 1
  24453. 1
  24454. 1
  24455. 1
  24456. 1
  24457. 1
  24458. 1
  24459. 1
  24460. 1
  24461. 1
  24462. 1
  24463. 1
  24464. 1
  24465. 1
  24466. 1
  24467. 1
  24468. 1
  24469. 1
  24470. 1
  24471. 1
  24472. 1
  24473. 1
  24474. 1
  24475. 1
  24476. 1
  24477. 1
  24478. 1
  24479. 1
  24480. 1
  24481. 1
  24482. 1
  24483. 1
  24484. 1
  24485. 1
  24486. 1
  24487. 1
  24488. 1
  24489. 1
  24490. 1
  24491. 1
  24492. 1
  24493. 1
  24494. 1
  24495. 1
  24496. 1
  24497. 1
  24498. 1
  24499. 1
  24500. 1
  24501. 1
  24502. 1
  24503. 1
  24504. 1
  24505. 1
  24506. 1
  24507. 1
  24508. 1
  24509. 1
  24510. 1
  24511. 1
  24512. 1
  24513. 1
  24514. 1
  24515. 1
  24516. 1
  24517. 1
  24518. 1
  24519. 1
  24520. 1
  24521. 1
  24522. 1
  24523. 1
  24524. 1
  24525. 1
  24526. 1
  24527. 1
  24528. 1
  24529. 1
  24530. 1
  24531. 1
  24532. 1
  24533. 1
  24534. 1
  24535. 1
  24536. 1
  24537. 1
  24538. 1
  24539. 1
  24540. 1
  24541. 1
  24542. 1
  24543. 1
  24544. 1
  24545. 1
  24546. 1
  24547. 1
  24548. 1
  24549. 1
  24550. 1
  24551. 1
  24552. 1
  24553. 1
  24554. 1
  24555. 1
  24556. 1
  24557. 1
  24558. 1
  24559. 1
  24560. 1
  24561. 1
  24562. 1
  24563. 1
  24564. 1
  24565. 1
  24566. 1
  24567. 1
  24568. 1
  24569. 1
  24570. 1
  24571. 1
  24572. 1
  24573. 1
  24574. 1
  24575. 1
  24576. 1
  24577. 1
  24578. 1
  24579. 1
  24580. 1
  24581. 1
  24582. 1
  24583. 1
  24584. 1
  24585. 1
  24586. 1
  24587. 1
  24588. 1
  24589. 1
  24590. 1
  24591. 1
  24592. 1
  24593. 1
  24594. 1
  24595. 1
  24596. 1
  24597. 1
  24598. 1
  24599. 1
  24600. 1
  24601. 1
  24602. 1
  24603. 1
  24604. 1
  24605. 1
  24606. 1
  24607. 1
  24608. 1
  24609. 1
  24610. 1
  24611. 1
  24612. 1
  24613. 1
  24614. 1
  24615. 1
  24616. 1
  24617. 1
  24618. 1
  24619. 1
  24620. 1
  24621. 1
  24622. 1
  24623. 1
  24624. 1
  24625. 1
  24626. 1
  24627. 1
  24628. 1
  24629. 1
  24630. 1
  24631. 1
  24632. 1
  24633. 1
  24634. 1
  24635. 1
  24636. 1
  24637. 1
  24638. 1
  24639. 1
  24640. 1
  24641. 1
  24642. 1
  24643. 1
  24644. 1
  24645. 1
  24646. 1
  24647. 1
  24648. 1
  24649. 1
  24650. 1
  24651. 1
  24652. 1
  24653. 1
  24654. 1
  24655. 1
  24656. 1
  24657. 1
  24658. 1
  24659. 1
  24660. 1
  24661. 1
  24662. 1
  24663. 1
  24664. 1
  24665. 1
  24666. 1
  24667. 1
  24668. 1
  24669. 1
  24670. 1
  24671. 1
  24672. 1
  24673. 1
  24674. 1
  24675. 1
  24676. 1
  24677. 1
  24678. 1
  24679. 1
  24680. 1
  24681. 1
  24682. 1
  24683. 1
  24684. 1
  24685. 1
  24686. 1
  24687. 1
  24688. 1
  24689. 1
  24690. 1
  24691. 1
  24692. 1
  24693. 1
  24694. 1
  24695. 1
  24696. 1
  24697. 1
  24698. 1
  24699. 1
  24700. 1
  24701. 1
  24702. 1
  24703. 1
  24704. 1
  24705. 1
  24706. 1
  24707. 1
  24708. 1
  24709. 1
  24710. 1
  24711. 1
  24712. 1
  24713. 1
  24714. 1
  24715. 1
  24716. 1
  24717. 1
  24718. 1
  24719. 1
  24720. 1
  24721. 1
  24722. 1
  24723. 1
  24724. 1
  24725. 1
  24726. 1
  24727. 1
  24728. 1
  24729. 1
  24730. 1
  24731. 1
  24732. 1
  24733. 1
  24734. 1
  24735. 1
  24736. 1
  24737. 1
  24738. 1
  24739. 1
  24740. 1
  24741. 1
  24742. 1
  24743. 1
  24744. 1
  24745. 1
  24746. 1
  24747. 1
  24748. 1
  24749. 1
  24750. 1
  24751. 1
  24752. 1
  24753. 1
  24754. 1
  24755. 1
  24756. 1
  24757. 1
  24758. 1
  24759. 1
  24760. 1
  24761. 1
  24762. 1
  24763. 1
  24764. 1
  24765. 1
  24766. 1
  24767. 1
  24768. 1
  24769. 1
  24770. 1
  24771. 1
  24772. 1
  24773. 1
  24774. 1
  24775. 1
  24776. 1
  24777. 1
  24778. 1
  24779. 1
  24780. 1
  24781. 1
  24782. 1
  24783. 1
  24784. Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    1
  24785. 1
  24786. 1
  24787. 1
  24788. 1
  24789. 1
  24790. 1
  24791. 1
  24792. 1
  24793. 1
  24794. 1
  24795. 1
  24796. 1
  24797. 1
  24798. 1
  24799. 1
  24800. 1
  24801. 1
  24802. 1
  24803. 1
  24804. 1
  24805. 1
  24806. 1
  24807. 1
  24808. 1
  24809. 1
  24810. 1
  24811. 1
  24812. 1
  24813. 1
  24814. 1
  24815. 1
  24816. 1
  24817. 1
  24818. 1
  24819. 1
  24820. 1
  24821. 1
  24822. 1
  24823. 1
  24824. 1
  24825. 1
  24826. 1
  24827. 1
  24828. 1
  24829. 1
  24830. 1
  24831. 1
  24832. 1
  24833. 1
  24834. 1
  24835. 1
  24836. 1
  24837. 1
  24838. 1
  24839. 1
  24840. 1
  24841. 1
  24842. 1
  24843. 1
  24844. 1
  24845. 1
  24846. 1
  24847. 1
  24848. 1
  24849. 1
  24850. 1
  24851. 1
  24852. 1
  24853. 1
  24854. 1
  24855. 1
  24856. 1
  24857. 1
  24858. 1
  24859. 1
  24860. 1
  24861. 1
  24862. 1
  24863. 1
  24864. 1
  24865. 1
  24866. 1
  24867. 1
  24868. 1
  24869. 1
  24870. 1
  24871. 1
  24872. 1
  24873. 1
  24874. 1
  24875. 1
  24876. 1
  24877. 1
  24878. 1
  24879. 1
  24880. 1
  24881. 1
  24882. 1
  24883. 1
  24884. 1
  24885. 1
  24886. 1
  24887. 1
  24888. 1
  24889. 1
  24890. 1
  24891. 1
  24892. 1
  24893. 1
  24894. 1
  24895. 1
  24896. 1
  24897. 1
  24898. 1
  24899. 1
  24900. 1
  24901. 1
  24902. 1
  24903. 1
  24904. 1
  24905. 1
  24906. 1
  24907. 1
  24908. 1
  24909. 1
  24910. 1
  24911. 1
  24912. 1
  24913. 1
  24914. 1
  24915. 1
  24916. 1
  24917. 1
  24918. 1
  24919. 1
  24920. 1
  24921. 1
  24922. 1
  24923. 1
  24924. 1
  24925. 1
  24926. 1
  24927. 1
  24928. 1
  24929. 1
  24930. 1
  24931. 1
  24932. 1
  24933. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  24934. 1
  24935. 1
  24936. 1
  24937. 1
  24938. 1
  24939. 1
  24940. 1
  24941. 1
  24942. 1
  24943. 1
  24944. 1
  24945. 1
  24946. 1
  24947. 1
  24948. 1
  24949. 1
  24950. 1
  24951. 1
  24952. 1
  24953. 1
  24954. 1
  24955. 1
  24956. 1
  24957. 1
  24958. 1
  24959. 1
  24960. 1
  24961. 1
  24962. 1
  24963. 1
  24964. 1
  24965. 1
  24966. 1
  24967. 1
  24968. 1
  24969. 1
  24970. 1
  24971. 1
  24972. 1
  24973. 1
  24974. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  24975. 1
  24976. 1
  24977. 1
  24978. 1
  24979. 1
  24980. 1
  24981. 1
  24982. 1
  24983. 1
  24984. 1
  24985. 1
  24986. 1
  24987. 1
  24988. 1
  24989. 1
  24990. 1
  24991. 1
  24992. 1
  24993. 1
  24994. 1
  24995. 1
  24996. 1
  24997. 1
  24998. 1
  24999. 1
  25000. 1
  25001. 1
  25002. 1
  25003. 1
  25004. 1
  25005. 1
  25006. 1
  25007. 1
  25008. 1
  25009. 1
  25010. 1
  25011. 1
  25012. 1
  25013. 1
  25014. 1
  25015. 1
  25016. 1
  25017. 1
  25018. 1
  25019. 1
  25020. 1
  25021. 1
  25022. 1
  25023. 1
  25024. 1
  25025. 1
  25026. 1
  25027. 1
  25028. 1
  25029. 1
  25030. 1
  25031. 1
  25032. 1
  25033. 1
  25034. 1
  25035. 1
  25036. 1
  25037. 1
  25038. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  25039. 1
  25040. 1
  25041. 1
  25042. 1
  25043. 1
  25044. 1
  25045. 1
  25046. 1
  25047. 1
  25048. 1
  25049. 1
  25050. 1
  25051. 1
  25052. 1
  25053. 1
  25054. 1
  25055. 1
  25056. 1
  25057. 1
  25058. 1
  25059. 1
  25060. 1
  25061. 1
  25062. 1
  25063. 1
  25064. 1
  25065. 1
  25066. 1
  25067. 1
  25068. 1
  25069. 1
  25070. 1
  25071. 1
  25072. 1
  25073. 1
  25074. 1
  25075. 1
  25076. 1
  25077. 1
  25078. 1
  25079. 1
  25080. 1
  25081. 1
  25082.  @bluecedar7914  From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    1
  25083. 1
  25084. 1
  25085. 1
  25086. 1
  25087. 1
  25088. 1
  25089. 1
  25090. 1
  25091. 1
  25092. 1
  25093. 1
  25094. 1
  25095. 1
  25096. 1
  25097. 1
  25098. 1
  25099. 1
  25100. 1
  25101. 1
  25102. 1
  25103. 1
  25104. 1
  25105. 1
  25106. 1
  25107. 1
  25108. 1
  25109. 1
  25110. 1
  25111. 1
  25112. 1
  25113. 1
  25114. 1
  25115. 1
  25116. 1
  25117. 1
  25118. 1
  25119. 1
  25120. 1
  25121. 1
  25122. 1
  25123. 1
  25124. 1
  25125. 1
  25126. 1
  25127. 1
  25128. 1
  25129. 1
  25130. 1
  25131. 1
  25132. 1
  25133. 1
  25134. 1
  25135. 1
  25136. 1
  25137. 1
  25138. 1
  25139. 1
  25140. 1
  25141. 1
  25142. 1
  25143. 1
  25144. 1
  25145. 1
  25146. 1
  25147. 1
  25148. 1
  25149. 1
  25150. 1
  25151. 1
  25152. 1
  25153. 1
  25154. 1
  25155. 1
  25156. 1
  25157. 1
  25158. 1
  25159. 1
  25160. 1
  25161. 1
  25162. 1
  25163. 1
  25164. 1
  25165. 1
  25166. 1
  25167. 1
  25168. 1
  25169. 1
  25170. 1
  25171. 1
  25172. 1
  25173. 1
  25174. 1
  25175. 1
  25176. 1
  25177. 1
  25178. 1
  25179. 1
  25180. 1
  25181. 1
  25182. 1
  25183. 1
  25184. 1
  25185. 1
  25186. 1
  25187. 1
  25188. 1
  25189. 1
  25190. 1
  25191. 1
  25192. 1
  25193. 1
  25194. 1
  25195. 1
  25196. 1
  25197. 1
  25198. 1
  25199. 1
  25200. 1
  25201. 1
  25202. 1
  25203. 1
  25204. 1
  25205. 1
  25206. 1
  25207. 1
  25208. 1
  25209. 1
  25210. 1
  25211. 1
  25212. 1
  25213. 1
  25214. 1
  25215. 1
  25216. 1
  25217. 1
  25218. 1
  25219. 1
  25220. 1
  25221. 1
  25222. 1
  25223. 1
  25224. 1
  25225. 1
  25226. 1
  25227. 1
  25228. 1
  25229. 1
  25230. 1
  25231. 1
  25232. 1
  25233. 1
  25234. 1
  25235. 1
  25236. 1
  25237. 1
  25238. 1
  25239. 1
  25240. 1
  25241. 1
  25242. South Africans Demands UK to return diamonds in King Charles crown jewels Some South Africans are calling on the United Kingdom to return the world's largest diamond, known as the Star of Africa, to its rightful place in South Africa. The diamond is currently set in the royal sceptre that King Charles III coronation will hold on Saturday, May 6th, 2023. According to the Royal Collection Trust, which oversees the royal collection of the British royal family, the Cullinan diamond was presented to King Edward VII (the British monarch at the time) in 1907, two years after its discovery in a private mine in South Africa's old Transvaal province. Now amid a global conversation about returning artwork and artefacts that were stolen during colonial times, some South Africans are calling for the diamond to be brought back. “The diamond needs to come to South Africa. It needs to be a sign of our pride, our heritage and our culture,” said Mothusi Kamanga, a lawyer and activist in Johannesburg who has promoted an online petition, which has gathered about 8,000 signatures, for the diamond to be returned. “I think generally the African people are starting to realize that to decolonise is not just to let people have certain freedoms, but it’s also to take back what has been expropriated from us.” The diamond in the sceptre, officially known as Cullinan I, was cut from the Cullinan diamond, a 3,100-carat stone mined near Pretoria. Cullinan II, a lesser diamond cut from the same stone, sits in the Imperial State Crown, which British monarchs wear on formal occasions. It is stored at the Tower of London with the other crown jewels, together with the sceptre. Ironically, only a replica of the whole Cullinan diamond, which is about the size of a man’s fist, is displayed at the Cape Town Diamond Museum.
    1
  25243. 1
  25244. 1
  25245. 1
  25246. 1
  25247. 1
  25248. 1
  25249. 1
  25250. 1
  25251. 1
  25252. 1
  25253. 1
  25254. 1
  25255. 1
  25256. 1
  25257. 1
  25258. 1
  25259. 1
  25260. 1
  25261. 1
  25262. 1
  25263. 1
  25264. 1
  25265. 1
  25266. 1
  25267. 1
  25268. 1
  25269. 1
  25270. 1
  25271. 1
  25272. 1
  25273. 1
  25274. 1
  25275. 1
  25276. 1
  25277. 1
  25278. 1
  25279. 1
  25280. 1
  25281. 1
  25282. 1
  25283. 1
  25284. 1
  25285. 1
  25286. 1
  25287. 1
  25288. 1
  25289. 1
  25290. 1
  25291. 1
  25292. 1
  25293. 1
  25294. 1
  25295. 1
  25296. 1
  25297. 1
  25298. 1
  25299. 1
  25300. 1
  25301. 1
  25302. 1
  25303. 1
  25304. 1
  25305. 1
  25306. 1
  25307. 1
  25308. 1
  25309. 1
  25310. 1
  25311. 1
  25312. 1
  25313. 1
  25314. 1
  25315. 1
  25316. 1
  25317. 1
  25318. 1
  25319. 1
  25320. 1
  25321. 1
  25322. 1
  25323. 1
  25324. 1
  25325. 1
  25326. 1
  25327. 1
  25328. 1
  25329. 1
  25330. 1
  25331. 1
  25332. 1
  25333. 1
  25334. 1
  25335. 1
  25336. BERLIN, Aug 1 2024 - High energy prices and a lack of reliable energy supplies are hindering German companies' production and investments, with a growing trend of industrial firms considering relocating abroad, a survey showed on Thursday. Germany's industrial firms have been suffering from a contraction in economic activity in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with the ensuing slump in Russian energy imports triggering sharp energy price rallies in 2022. Prices have since fallen but are still high compared to other countries. A poll by Germany's DIHK Chambers of Industry and Commerce of around 3,300 companies showed that 37% were considering cutting production or moving abroad, up from 31% last year and 16% in 2022. For energy-intensive industrial firms some 45% of companies were mulling slashing output or relocation, the survey showed. "The trust of the German economy in energy policy is severely damaged," Achim Dercks, DIHK deputy chief executive said, adding that the government had not succeeded in providing companies with a perspective for reliable and affordable energy supply. "Those who fail to recognise this will eventually witness the deindustrialization of our country," he said. More than a third of industrial companies in Germany are reducing investment in core processes due to high energy costs, the survey showed, adding that two-thirds of industrial firms saw their competitiveness at risk. Dercks said Berlin's package presented last month to strengthen the country as an industrial location did not go far enough, adding that solutions for energy supply and prices were left out. "For many industrial companies, however, this is currently the decisive location issue," he added. Germany's economy ministry last year proposed a subsidy for industrial electricity prices but the proposal was challenged by the finance ministry and then completely scrapped after a constitutional court ruling forced the coalition to make painful cuts to its 2024 budget.
    1
  25337. 1
  25338. 1
  25339. 1
  25340. 1
  25341. 1
  25342. 1
  25343. 1
  25344. 1
  25345. 1
  25346. 1
  25347. 1
  25348. 1
  25349. 1
  25350. 1
  25351. 1
  25352. 1
  25353. 1
  25354. 1
  25355. 1
  25356. 1
  25357. 1
  25358. 1
  25359. 1
  25360. 1
  25361. 1
  25362. 1
  25363. 1
  25364. 1
  25365. 1
  25366. 1
  25367. 1
  25368. 1
  25369. 1
  25370. 1
  25371. 1
  25372. 1
  25373. 1
  25374. 1
  25375. 1
  25376. 1
  25377. 1
  25378. 1
  25379. 1
  25380. 1
  25381. 1
  25382. 1
  25383. 1
  25384. 1
  25385. Philippe Le Corre Philippe Le Corre is a Senior Fellow with the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis and a Senior Fellow with the Harvard Kennedy School’s Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, specializing in China’s geoeconomic and geopolitical rise, China-EU relations, and Chinese foreign direct investment. He is also a Visiting Professor at ESSEC Business School in Paris, a Senior Research Fellow with the ESSEC Institute for Research and Education in Negotiation, and an Affiliate with the French Institute for East Asia (IFRAE-CNRS). He was previously a fellow with the Brookings Institution in Washington and has testified several times before the U.S. Congress. He has worked on China since the late 1980s first as a foreign correspondent for Radio France International, then as a senior adviser to the French Minister of Defense, a consultant, and a think-tanker. He is the author or co-author of several books on China, including China’s Offensive in Europe (Brookings Institution Press, 2016), and has contributed chapters to edited volumes such as “Does the Rise of China Threaten the Transatlantic Partnership?” in The China Questions 2 (Harvard University Press, 2022), “European and American Approaches Towards Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Post-COVID Times: Opportunities, challenges and policy responses” in Europe in an era of Growing Sino-American Competition (Routledge, 2021), and China-US-Europe Relations in a New Era (Routledge, 2020). He has also contributed to publications such as The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, National Interest, Le Monde, Les Echos, Nikkei Asia, China Perspectives, and Asia-Europe Journal. He is the co-author of the 2021 Carnegie report “China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries.”
    1
  25386. 1
  25387. 1
  25388. 1
  25389. 1
  25390. 1
  25391. 1
  25392. 1
  25393. 1
  25394. 1
  25395. 1
  25396. 1
  25397. 1
  25398. 1
  25399. 1
  25400. 1
  25401. 1
  25402. 1
  25403. 1
  25404. 1
  25405. 1
  25406. 1
  25407. 1
  25408. 1
  25409. 1
  25410. 1
  25411. 1
  25412. 1
  25413. 1
  25414. 1
  25415. 1
  25416. 1
  25417. 1
  25418. 1
  25419. 1
  25420. 1
  25421. 1
  25422. 1
  25423. 1
  25424. 1
  25425. 1
  25426. 1
  25427. 1
  25428. 1
  25429. 1
  25430. 1
  25431. 1
  25432. 1
  25433. 1
  25434. 1
  25435. 1
  25436. 1
  25437. 1
  25438. 1
  25439. 1
  25440. 1
  25441. 1
  25442. 1
  25443. 1
  25444. 1
  25445. 1
  25446. 1
  25447. 1
  25448. 1
  25449. 1
  25450. 1
  25451. 1
  25452. 1
  25453. 1
  25454. 1
  25455. 1
  25456. 1
  25457. 1
  25458. 1
  25459. 1
  25460. 1
  25461. 1
  25462. 1
  25463. 1
  25464. 1
  25465. 1
  25466. 1
  25467. 1
  25468. 1
  25469. 1
  25470. 1
  25471. 1
  25472. 1
  25473. 1
  25474. 1
  25475. 1
  25476. 1
  25477. 1
  25478. 1
  25479. 1
  25480. 1
  25481. 1
  25482. 1
  25483. 1
  25484. 1
  25485. 1
  25486. 1
  25487. 1
  25488. 1
  25489. 1
  25490. 1
  25491. 1
  25492. 1
  25493. 1
  25494. 1
  25495. 1
  25496. 1
  25497. 1
  25498. 1
  25499. 1
  25500. 1
  25501. 1
  25502. 1
  25503. 1
  25504. 1
  25505. 1
  25506. 1
  25507. 1
  25508. 1
  25509. 1
  25510. 1
  25511. 1
  25512. 1
  25513. 1
  25514. 1
  25515. 1
  25516. 1
  25517. 1
  25518. 1
  25519. 1
  25520. 1
  25521. 1
  25522. 1
  25523. 1
  25524. 1
  25525. 1
  25526. 1
  25527. 1
  25528. 1
  25529. 1
  25530. 1
  25531. 1
  25532. 1
  25533. 1
  25534. 1
  25535. 1
  25536. 1
  25537. 1
  25538. 1
  25539. 1
  25540. 1
  25541. 1
  25542. 1
  25543. 1
  25544. 1
  25545. 1
  25546. 1
  25547. 1
  25548. 1
  25549. 1
  25550. 1
  25551. 1
  25552. 1
  25553. 1
  25554. 1
  25555. 1
  25556. 1
  25557. 1
  25558. 1
  25559. 1
  25560. 1
  25561. 1
  25562. 1
  25563. 1
  25564. 1
  25565. 1
  25566. 1
  25567. 1
  25568. 1
  25569. 1
  25570. 1
  25571. 1
  25572. 1
  25573. 1
  25574. 1
  25575. 1
  25576. 1
  25577. 1
  25578. 1
  25579. 1
  25580. 1
  25581. 1
  25582. 1
  25583. 1
  25584. 1
  25585. 1
  25586. 1
  25587. 1
  25588. 1
  25589. 1
  25590. 1
  25591. 1
  25592. 1
  25593. 1
  25594. 1
  25595. 1
  25596. 1
  25597. 1
  25598. 1
  25599. 1
  25600. 1
  25601. 1
  25602. 1
  25603. 1
  25604. 1
  25605. 1
  25606. 1
  25607. 1
  25608. 1
  25609. 1
  25610. 1
  25611. 1
  25612. 1
  25613. 1
  25614. 1
  25615. 1
  25616. 1
  25617. 1
  25618. 1
  25619. 1
  25620. 1
  25621. 1
  25622. 1
  25623. 1
  25624. 1
  25625. 1
  25626. 1
  25627. 1
  25628. 1
  25629. 1
  25630. 1
  25631. 1
  25632. 1
  25633. 1
  25634. 1
  25635. 1
  25636. 1
  25637. 1
  25638. 1
  25639. 1
  25640. 1
  25641. 1
  25642. 1
  25643. 1
  25644. 1
  25645. 1
  25646. 1
  25647. 1
  25648. 1
  25649. 1
  25650. 1
  25651. 1
  25652. 1
  25653. 1
  25654. 1
  25655. 1
  25656. 1
  25657. 1
  25658. 1
  25659. 1
  25660. 1
  25661. 1
  25662. 1
  25663. 1
  25664. 1
  25665. 1
  25666. 1
  25667. 1
  25668. 1
  25669. 1
  25670. 1
  25671. 1
  25672. 1
  25673. 1
  25674. 1
  25675. 1
  25676. 1
  25677. 1
  25678. 1
  25679. 1
  25680. 1
  25681. 1
  25682. 1
  25683. 1
  25684. 1
  25685. 1
  25686. 1
  25687. 1
  25688. 1
  25689. 1
  25690. 1
  25691. 1
  25692. 1
  25693. 1
  25694. 1
  25695. 1
  25696. 1
  25697. 1
  25698. 1
  25699. 1
  25700. 1
  25701. 1
  25702. 1
  25703. 1
  25704. 1
  25705. 1
  25706. 1
  25707. 1
  25708. 1
  25709. 1
  25710. 1
  25711. 1
  25712. 1
  25713. 1
  25714. 1
  25715. 1
  25716. 1
  25717. 1
  25718. 1
  25719. 1
  25720. 1
  25721. 1
  25722. 1
  25723. 1
  25724. 1
  25725. 1
  25726. 1
  25727. 1
  25728. 1
  25729. 1
  25730. 1
  25731. 1
  25732. 1
  25733. 1
  25734. 1
  25735. 1
  25736. 1
  25737. 1
  25738. 1
  25739. 1
  25740. 1
  25741. 1
  25742. 1
  25743. 1
  25744. 1
  25745. 1
  25746. 1
  25747. 1
  25748. 1
  25749. 1
  25750. 1
  25751. 1
  25752. 1
  25753. 1
  25754. 1
  25755. 1
  25756. 1
  25757. 1
  25758. 1
  25759. 1
  25760. 1
  25761. 1
  25762. 1
  25763. 1
  25764. 1
  25765. 1
  25766. 1
  25767. 1
  25768. 1
  25769. 1
  25770. 1
  25771. 1
  25772. 1
  25773. 1
  25774. 1
  25775. 1
  25776. 1
  25777. 1
  25778. 1
  25779. 1
  25780. 1
  25781. 1
  25782. 1
  25783. 1
  25784. 1
  25785. 1
  25786. 1
  25787. 1
  25788. 1
  25789. 1
  25790. 1
  25791. 1
  25792. 1
  25793. 1
  25794. 1
  25795. 1
  25796. 1
  25797. 1
  25798. 1
  25799. 1
  25800. 1
  25801. 1
  25802. 1
  25803. 1
  25804. 1
  25805. 1
  25806. 1
  25807. 1
  25808. 1
  25809. 1
  25810. 1
  25811. 1
  25812. 1
  25813. 1
  25814. 1
  25815. 1
  25816. 1
  25817. 1
  25818. 1
  25819. 1
  25820. 1
  25821. 1
  25822. 1
  25823. 1
  25824. 1
  25825. 1
  25826. 1
  25827. 1
  25828. 1
  25829. 1
  25830. 1
  25831. 1
  25832. 1
  25833. 1
  25834. 1
  25835. 1
  25836. 1
  25837. 1
  25838. 1
  25839. 1
  25840. 1
  25841. 1
  25842. 1
  25843. 1
  25844. 1
  25845. 1
  25846. 1
  25847. 1
  25848. 1
  25849. 1
  25850. 1
  25851. 1
  25852. 1
  25853. 1
  25854. 1
  25855. 1
  25856. 1
  25857. 1
  25858. 1
  25859. 1
  25860. 1
  25861. 1
  25862. 1
  25863. 1
  25864. 1
  25865. 1
  25866. 1
  25867. 1
  25868. 1
  25869. 1
  25870. 1
  25871. 1
  25872. 1
  25873. 1
  25874. 1
  25875. 1
  25876. 1
  25877. 1
  25878. 1
  25879. 1
  25880. 1
  25881. 1
  25882. 1
  25883. 1
  25884. 1
  25885. 1
  25886. 1
  25887. 1
  25888. 1
  25889. 1
  25890. 1
  25891. 1
  25892. 1
  25893. 1
  25894. 1
  25895. 1
  25896. 1
  25897. 1
  25898. 1
  25899. 1
  25900. 1
  25901. 1
  25902. 1
  25903. 1
  25904. 1
  25905. 1
  25906. 1
  25907. 1
  25908. 1
  25909. 1
  25910. 1
  25911. 1
  25912. 1
  25913. 1
  25914. 1
  25915. 1
  25916. 1
  25917. 1
  25918. 1
  25919. 1
  25920. 1
  25921. 1
  25922. 1
  25923. 1
  25924. 1
  25925. 1
  25926. 1
  25927. 1
  25928. 1
  25929. 1
  25930. 1
  25931. 1
  25932. 1
  25933. 1
  25934. 1
  25935. 1
  25936. 1
  25937. 1
  25938. 1
  25939. 1
  25940. 1
  25941. 1
  25942. 1
  25943. 1
  25944. 1
  25945. 1
  25946. 1
  25947. 1
  25948. 1
  25949. 1
  25950. 1
  25951. 1
  25952. 1
  25953. 1
  25954. 1
  25955. 1
  25956. 1
  25957. 1
  25958. 1
  25959. 1
  25960. 1
  25961. 1
  25962. 1
  25963. 1
  25964. 1
  25965. 1
  25966. 1
  25967. 1
  25968. 1
  25969. 1
  25970. 1
  25971. 1
  25972. 1
  25973. 1
  25974. 1
  25975. 1
  25976. 1
  25977. 1
  25978. 1
  25979. 1
  25980. 1
  25981. 1
  25982. 1
  25983. 1
  25984. 1
  25985. 1
  25986. 1
  25987. 1
  25988. 1
  25989. 1
  25990. 1
  25991. 1
  25992. 1
  25993. 1
  25994. 1
  25995. 1
  25996. 1
  25997. 1
  25998. 1
  25999. 1
  26000. 1
  26001. 1
  26002. 1
  26003. 1
  26004. 1
  26005. 1
  26006. 1
  26007. 1
  26008. 1
  26009. 1
  26010. 1
  26011. 1
  26012. 1
  26013. 1
  26014. 1
  26015. 1
  26016. 1
  26017. 1
  26018. 1
  26019. 1
  26020. 1
  26021. 1
  26022. 1
  26023. 1
  26024. 1
  26025. 1
  26026. 1
  26027. 1
  26028. 1
  26029. 1
  26030. 1
  26031. 1
  26032. 1
  26033. 1
  26034. 1
  26035. 1
  26036. 1
  26037. 1
  26038. 1
  26039. 1
  26040. 1
  26041. 1
  26042. 1
  26043. 1
  26044. 1
  26045. 1
  26046. 1
  26047. 1
  26048. 1
  26049. 1
  26050. 1
  26051. 1
  26052. 1
  26053. 1
  26054. 1
  26055. 1
  26056. 1
  26057. 1
  26058. 1
  26059. 1
  26060. 1
  26061. 1
  26062. 1
  26063. 1
  26064. 1
  26065. 1
  26066. 1
  26067. 1
  26068. 1
  26069. 1
  26070. 1
  26071. 1
  26072. 1
  26073. 1
  26074. 1
  26075. 1
  26076. 1
  26077. 1
  26078. 1
  26079. 1
  26080. 1
  26081. 1
  26082. 1
  26083. 1
  26084. 1
  26085. 1
  26086. 1
  26087. 1
  26088. 1
  26089. 1
  26090. 1
  26091. 1
  26092. 1
  26093. 1
  26094. 1
  26095. 1
  26096. 1
  26097. 1
  26098. 1
  26099. 1
  26100. 1
  26101. 1
  26102. 1
  26103. 1
  26104. 1
  26105. 1
  26106. 1
  26107. 1
  26108. 1
  26109. 1
  26110. 1
  26111. 1
  26112. 1
  26113. 1
  26114. 1
  26115. 1
  26116. 1
  26117. 1
  26118. 1
  26119. 1
  26120. 1
  26121. 1
  26122. 1
  26123. 1
  26124. 1
  26125. 1
  26126. 1
  26127. 1
  26128. 1
  26129. 1
  26130. 1
  26131. 1
  26132. 1
  26133. 1
  26134. 1
  26135. 1
  26136. 1
  26137. 1
  26138. 1
  26139. 1
  26140. 1
  26141. 1
  26142. 1
  26143. 1
  26144. 1
  26145. 1
  26146. 1
  26147. 1
  26148. 1
  26149. 1
  26150. 1
  26151. 1
  26152. 1
  26153. 1
  26154. 1
  26155. 1
  26156. 1
  26157. 1
  26158. 1
  26159. 1
  26160. 1
  26161. 1
  26162. 1
  26163. 1
  26164. 1
  26165. 1
  26166. 1
  26167. 1
  26168. 1
  26169. 1
  26170. 1
  26171. 1
  26172. 1
  26173. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  26174. 1
  26175. 1
  26176. 1
  26177. 1
  26178. 1
  26179. 1
  26180. 1
  26181. 1
  26182. 1
  26183. 1
  26184. 1
  26185. 1
  26186. 1
  26187. 1
  26188. 1
  26189. 1
  26190. 1
  26191. 1
  26192. 1
  26193. 1
  26194. 1
  26195. 1
  26196. 1
  26197. 1
  26198. 1
  26199. 1
  26200. 1
  26201. 1
  26202. 1
  26203. 1
  26204. 1
  26205. 1
  26206. 1
  26207. 1
  26208. 1
  26209. 1
  26210. 1
  26211. 1
  26212. 1
  26213. 1
  26214. 1
  26215. 1
  26216. 1
  26217. 1
  26218. 1
  26219. 1
  26220. 1
  26221. 1
  26222. 1
  26223. 1
  26224. 1
  26225. 1
  26226. 1
  26227. 1
  26228. 1
  26229. 1
  26230. 1
  26231. 1
  26232. 1
  26233. 1
  26234. 1
  26235. 1
  26236. 1
  26237. 1
  26238. 1
  26239. 1
  26240. 1
  26241. 1
  26242. 1
  26243. 1
  26244. 1
  26245. 1
  26246. 1
  26247. 1
  26248. 1
  26249. 1
  26250. 1
  26251. 1
  26252. 1
  26253. 1
  26254. 1
  26255. 1
  26256. 1
  26257. 1
  26258. 1
  26259. 1
  26260. 1
  26261. 1
  26262. 1
  26263. 1
  26264. 1
  26265. 1
  26266. 1
  26267. 1
  26268. 1
  26269. 1
  26270. 1
  26271. 1
  26272. 1
  26273. 1
  26274. 1
  26275. 1
  26276. 1
  26277. 1
  26278. 1
  26279. 1
  26280. 1
  26281. 1
  26282. 1
  26283. 1
  26284. 1
  26285. 1
  26286. 1
  26287. 1
  26288. 1
  26289. 1
  26290. 1
  26291. 1
  26292. 1
  26293. 1
  26294. 1
  26295. 1
  26296. 1
  26297. 1
  26298. 1
  26299. 1
  26300. 1
  26301. 1
  26302. 1
  26303. 1
  26304. 1
  26305. 1
  26306. 1
  26307. 1
  26308. 1
  26309. 1
  26310. 1
  26311. 1
  26312. 1
  26313. 1
  26314. 1
  26315. 1
  26316. 1
  26317. 1
  26318. 1
  26319. 1
  26320. 1
  26321. 1
  26322. 1
  26323. 1
  26324. 1
  26325. 1
  26326. 1
  26327. 1
  26328. 1
  26329. 1
  26330. 1
  26331. 1
  26332. 1
  26333. 1
  26334. 1
  26335. 1
  26336. 1
  26337. 1
  26338. 1
  26339. 1
  26340. 1
  26341. 1
  26342. 1
  26343. 1
  26344. 1
  26345. 1
  26346. 1
  26347. 1
  26348. 1
  26349. 1
  26350. 1
  26351. 1
  26352. 1
  26353. 1
  26354. 1
  26355. 1
  26356. 1
  26357. 1
  26358. 1
  26359. 1
  26360. 1
  26361. 1
  26362. 1
  26363. 1
  26364. 1
  26365. 1
  26366. 1
  26367. 1
  26368. 1
  26369. 1
  26370. 1
  26371. 1
  26372. 1
  26373. 1
  26374. 1
  26375. 1
  26376. 1
  26377. 1
  26378. 1
  26379. 1
  26380. 1
  26381. 1
  26382. 1
  26383. 1
  26384. 1
  26385. 1
  26386. 1
  26387. 1
  26388. 1
  26389. 1
  26390. 1
  26391. 1
  26392. 1
  26393. 1
  26394. 1
  26395. Under international laws, NATO is not legal NATO actions constitute a violation of Chapter 1, Article 2(4), of the UN Charter, which states, “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the UN.” Chapter 7, Article 39, states: “The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.” The bombing of Yugoslavia is a violation of NATO’s own charter, which claims it is a defensive organization and is committed to force only if one of its members is attacked. The so-called Rambouillet agreement (Serbia did not agree to it) is a violation of Articles 51 and 52 of the 1980 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Article 51, “Coercion of a Representative of a State,” declares: “The expression of a State’s consent to be bound by a treaty which has been procured by the coercion of its representative through acts or threats directed against him shall be without legal effect.” Article 52, “Coercion of a State by the Threat or Use of Force,” reads: “A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the UN.”
    1
  26396. 1
  26397. 1
  26398. 1
  26399. 1
  26400. 1
  26401. 1
  26402. 1
  26403. 1
  26404. 1
  26405. 1
  26406. 1
  26407. 1
  26408. 1
  26409. 1
  26410. 1
  26411. 1
  26412. 1
  26413. 1
  26414. 1
  26415. 1
  26416. 1
  26417. 1
  26418. 1
  26419. 1
  26420. 1
  26421. 1
  26422. 1
  26423. 1
  26424. 1
  26425. 1
  26426. 1
  26427. 1
  26428. 1
  26429. 1
  26430. 1
  26431. 1
  26432. 1
  26433. 1
  26434. 1
  26435. 1
  26436. 1
  26437. 1
  26438. 1
  26439. 1
  26440. 1
  26441. 1
  26442. 1
  26443. 1
  26444. 1
  26445. 1
  26446. 1
  26447. 1
  26448. 1
  26449. 1
  26450. 1
  26451. 1
  26452. 1
  26453. 1
  26454. 1
  26455. 1
  26456. 1
  26457. 1
  26458. 1
  26459. 1
  26460. 1
  26461. 1
  26462. 1
  26463. 1
  26464. 1
  26465. 1
  26466. 1
  26467. 1
  26468. 1
  26469. 1
  26470. 1
  26471. 1
  26472. 1
  26473. 1
  26474. 1
  26475. 1
  26476. 1
  26477. 1
  26478. 1
  26479. 1
  26480. 1
  26481. 1
  26482. 1
  26483. 1
  26484. 1
  26485. 1
  26486. 1
  26487. 1
  26488. 1
  26489. 1
  26490. 1
  26491. 1
  26492. 1
  26493. 1
  26494. 1
  26495. 1
  26496. 1
  26497. 1
  26498. 1
  26499. 1
  26500. 1
  26501. 1
  26502. 1
  26503. 1
  26504. 1
  26505. 1
  26506. 1
  26507. 1
  26508. 1
  26509. 1
  26510. 1
  26511. 1
  26512. 1
  26513. 1
  26514. 1
  26515. 1
  26516. 1
  26517. 1
  26518. 1
  26519. 1
  26520. 1
  26521. 1
  26522. 1
  26523. 1
  26524. 1
  26525. 1
  26526. 1
  26527. 1
  26528. 1
  26529. 1
  26530. 1
  26531. 1
  26532. 1
  26533. 1
  26534. 1
  26535. 1
  26536. 1
  26537. 1
  26538. 1
  26539. 1
  26540. 1
  26541. 1
  26542. 1
  26543. 1
  26544. 1
  26545. 1
  26546. 1
  26547. 1
  26548. 1
  26549. 1
  26550. 1
  26551. 1
  26552. 1
  26553. 1
  26554. 1
  26555. 1
  26556. 1
  26557. 1
  26558. 1
  26559. 1
  26560. 1
  26561. 1
  26562. 1
  26563. 1
  26564. 1
  26565. 1
  26566. 1
  26567. 1
  26568. 1
  26569. 1
  26570. 1
  26571. @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Did DW report them? Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    1
  26572. 1
  26573. 1
  26574. 1
  26575. 1
  26576. 1
  26577. 1
  26578. 1
  26579. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  26580. 1
  26581. 1
  26582. 1
  26583. 1
  26584. 1
  26585. 1
  26586. 1
  26587. 1
  26588. 1
  26589. 1
  26590. 1
  26591. 1
  26592. 1
  26593. 1
  26594. 1
  26595. 1
  26596. 1
  26597. 1
  26598. 1
  26599. 1
  26600. 1
  26601. 1
  26602. 1
  26603. 1
  26604. 1
  26605. 1
  26606. 1
  26607. 1
  26608. 1
  26609. 1
  26610. 1
  26611. 1
  26612. 1
  26613. 1
  26614. 1
  26615. 1
  26616. 1
  26617. 1
  26618. 1
  26619. 1
  26620. 1
  26621. 1
  26622. 1
  26623. 1
  26624. 1
  26625. 1
  26626. 1
  26627. 1
  26628. 1
  26629. 1
  26630. 1
  26631. 1
  26632. 1
  26633. 1
  26634. 1
  26635. 1
  26636. 1
  26637. 1
  26638. 1
  26639. 1
  26640. 1
  26641. 1
  26642. 1
  26643. 1
  26644. 1
  26645. 1
  26646. 1
  26647. 1
  26648. 1
  26649. 1
  26650. 1
  26651. 1
  26652. 1
  26653. 1
  26654. 1
  26655. 1
  26656. 1
  26657. 1
  26658. 1
  26659. 1
  26660. 1
  26661. 1
  26662. 1
  26663. 1
  26664. 1
  26665. 1
  26666. 1
  26667. 1
  26668. 1
  26669. 1
  26670. 1
  26671. 1
  26672. 1
  26673. 1
  26674. 1
  26675. 1
  26676. 1
  26677. 1
  26678. 1
  26679. 1
  26680. 1
  26681. 1
  26682. 1
  26683. 1
  26684. 1
  26685. 1
  26686. 1
  26687. 1
  26688. 1
  26689. 1
  26690. 1
  26691. 1
  26692. 1
  26693. 1
  26694. 1
  26695. 1
  26696. 1
  26697. 1
  26698. 1
  26699. 1
  26700. 1
  26701. 1
  26702. 1
  26703. 1
  26704. 1
  26705. 1
  26706. 1
  26707. 1
  26708. 1
  26709. 1
  26710. 1
  26711. 1
  26712. 1
  26713. 1
  26714. 1
  26715. 1
  26716. 1
  26717. 1
  26718. 1
  26719. 1
  26720. 1
  26721. 1
  26722. 1
  26723. 1
  26724. 1
  26725. 1
  26726. 1
  26727. 1
  26728. 1
  26729. 1
  26730. 1
  26731. 1
  26732. 1
  26733. 1
  26734. 1
  26735. 1
  26736. 1
  26737. 1
  26738. 1
  26739. 1
  26740. 1
  26741. 1
  26742. 1
  26743. 1
  26744. 1
  26745. 1
  26746. 1
  26747. 1
  26748. 1
  26749. 1
  26750. 1
  26751. 1
  26752. 1
  26753. 1
  26754. 1
  26755. 1
  26756. 1
  26757. 1
  26758. 1
  26759. 1
  26760. 1
  26761. 1
  26762. 1
  26763. 1
  26764. 1
  26765. 1
  26766. 1
  26767. 1
  26768. 1
  26769. 1
  26770. 1
  26771. 1
  26772. 1
  26773. 1
  26774. 1
  26775. 1
  26776. 1
  26777. 1
  26778. 1
  26779. 1
  26780. 1
  26781. 1
  26782. 1
  26783. 1
  26784. 1
  26785. 1
  26786. 1
  26787. 1
  26788. 1
  26789. 1
  26790. 1
  26791. 1
  26792. 1
  26793. 1
  26794. 1
  26795. 1
  26796. 1
  26797. 1
  26798. 1
  26799. 1
  26800. 1
  26801. 1
  26802. 1
  26803. 1
  26804. 1
  26805. 1
  26806. 1
  26807. 1
  26808. 1
  26809. 1
  26810. 1
  26811. 1
  26812. 1
  26813. 1
  26814. 1
  26815. 1
  26816. 1
  26817. 1
  26818. 1
  26819. 1
  26820. 1
  26821. 1
  26822. 1
  26823. 1
  26824. 1
  26825. 1
  26826. 1
  26827. 1
  26828. 1
  26829. 1
  26830. 1
  26831. 1
  26832. 1
  26833. 1
  26834. 1
  26835. 1
  26836. 1
  26837. China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi has told a visiting delegation of Muslim officials that Beijing is willing to help “restore peace in the Middle East”. “Let us work together to quickly cool down the situation in Gaza and restore peace in the Middle East as soon as possible,” Wang told visiting diplomats from Arab and Muslim-majority nations on Monday. Wang also said a humanitarian disaster was unfolding in Gaza that “affects all countries around the world, questioning the human sense of right and wrong and humanity’s bottom line”. Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud said the international community needs to shoulder the responsibility to stop Israel. Officials from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Indonesia, Palestine and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation are in China as part of a tour that is calling for an end to fighting in Gaza and the delivery of more humanitarian aid into the territory. The delegation, which plans to meet officials from the permanent members of the UN Security Council, is also seeking to raise pressure on Western countries to reject Israel’s characterisation of its military campaign in Gaza as self-defence. An Arab-Islamic summit hosted by Saudi Arabia earlier this month demanded an end to the siege of Gaza, access to humanitarian aid, and a halt to the sale of arms to Israel while condemning “Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, war crimes and barbaric and inhumane massacres by the occupation government”.
    1
  26838. 1
  26839. 1
  26840. 1
  26841. 1
  26842. 1
  26843. 1
  26844. 1
  26845. 1
  26846. 1
  26847. 1
  26848. 1
  26849. 1
  26850. 1
  26851. 1
  26852. 1
  26853. 1
  26854. 1
  26855. 1
  26856. 1
  26857. 1
  26858. 1
  26859. 1
  26860. 1
  26861. 1
  26862. 1
  26863. 1
  26864. 1
  26865. 1
  26866. 1
  26867. 1
  26868. 1
  26869. 1
  26870. 1
  26871. 1
  26872. 1
  26873. 1
  26874. 1
  26875. 1
  26876. 1
  26877. 1
  26878. 1
  26879. 1
  26880. 1
  26881. 1
  26882. 1
  26883. 1
  26884. 1
  26885. 1
  26886. 1
  26887. 1
  26888. 1
  26889. 1
  26890. 1
  26891. 1
  26892. 1
  26893. 1
  26894. 1
  26895. 1
  26896. 1
  26897. 1
  26898. 1
  26899. 1
  26900. 1
  26901. 1
  26902. 1
  26903. 1
  26904. 1
  26905. 1
  26906. 1
  26907. 1
  26908. 1
  26909. 1
  26910. 1
  26911. 1
  26912. 1
  26913. 1
  26914. 1
  26915. 1
  26916. 1
  26917. 1
  26918. 1
  26919. 1
  26920. 1
  26921. 1
  26922. 1
  26923. 1
  26924. 1
  26925. 1
  26926. 1
  26927. 1
  26928. 1
  26929. 1
  26930. 1
  26931. 1
  26932. 1
  26933. 1
  26934. 1
  26935. 1
  26936. 1
  26937. 1
  26938. 1
  26939. 1
  26940. 1
  26941. 1
  26942. 1
  26943. 1
  26944. 1
  26945. 1
  26946. 1
  26947. 1
  26948. 1
  26949. 1
  26950. 1
  26951. 1
  26952. 1
  26953. 1
  26954. 1
  26955. 1
  26956. 1
  26957. 1
  26958. 1
  26959. 1
  26960. 1
  26961. 1
  26962. 1
  26963. 1
  26964. 1
  26965. 1
  26966. 1
  26967. 1
  26968. 1
  26969. 1
  26970. 1
  26971. 1
  26972. 1
  26973. 1
  26974. 1
  26975. 1
  26976. 1
  26977. 1
  26978. 1
  26979. 1
  26980. 1
  26981. 1
  26982. 1
  26983. 1
  26984. 1
  26985. 1
  26986. 1
  26987. 1
  26988. 1
  26989. 1
  26990. 1
  26991. 1
  26992. 1
  26993. 1
  26994. 1
  26995. 1
  26996. 1
  26997. 1
  26998. 1
  26999. 1
  27000. 1
  27001. 1
  27002. 1
  27003. 1
  27004. 1
  27005. 1
  27006. 1
  27007. 1
  27008. 1
  27009. 1
  27010. 1
  27011. 1
  27012. 1
  27013. 1
  27014. 1
  27015. 1
  27016. 1
  27017. 1
  27018. 1
  27019. 1
  27020. 1
  27021. 1
  27022. 1
  27023. 1
  27024. 1
  27025. 1
  27026. 1
  27027. 1
  27028. 1
  27029. 1
  27030. 1
  27031. 1
  27032. 1
  27033. 1
  27034. 1
  27035. 1
  27036. 1
  27037. 1
  27038. 1
  27039. 1
  27040. 1
  27041. 1
  27042. 1
  27043. 1
  27044. 1
  27045. 1
  27046. 1
  27047. 1
  27048. 1
  27049. 1
  27050. 1
  27051. 1
  27052. 1
  27053. 1
  27054. 1
  27055. 1
  27056. 1
  27057. 1
  27058. 1
  27059. 1
  27060. 1
  27061. 1
  27062. 1
  27063. 1
  27064. 1
  27065. 1
  27066. 1
  27067. 1
  27068. 1
  27069. 1
  27070. 1
  27071. 1
  27072. 1
  27073. 1
  27074. 1
  27075. 1
  27076. 1
  27077. 1
  27078. 1
  27079. 1
  27080. 1
  27081. 1
  27082. 1
  27083. 1
  27084. 1
  27085. 1
  27086. 1
  27087. 1
  27088. 1
  27089. 1
  27090. 1
  27091. 1
  27092. 1
  27093. 1
  27094. 1
  27095. 1
  27096. 1
  27097. 1
  27098. 1
  27099. 1
  27100. 1
  27101. 1
  27102. 1
  27103. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  27104. 1
  27105. 1
  27106. 1
  27107. 1
  27108. 1
  27109. 1
  27110. 1
  27111. 1
  27112. 1
  27113. 1
  27114. 1
  27115. 1
  27116. 1
  27117. 1
  27118. 1
  27119. 1
  27120. 1
  27121. 1
  27122. 1
  27123. 1
  27124. 1
  27125. 1
  27126. 1
  27127. 1
  27128. 1
  27129. 1
  27130. 1
  27131. 1
  27132. 1
  27133. 1
  27134. 1
  27135. 1
  27136. 1
  27137. 1
  27138. 1
  27139. 1
  27140. 1
  27141. 1
  27142. 1
  27143. 1
  27144. 1
  27145. 1
  27146. 1
  27147. 1
  27148. 1
  27149. 1
  27150. 1
  27151. 1
  27152. 1
  27153. 1
  27154. 1
  27155. 1
  27156. 1
  27157. 1
  27158. 1
  27159. 1
  27160. 1
  27161. 1
  27162. 1
  27163. 1
  27164. 1
  27165. 1
  27166. 1
  27167. 1
  27168. 1
  27169. 1
  27170. 1
  27171. 1
  27172. 1
  27173. 1
  27174. 1
  27175. 1
  27176. 1
  27177. 1
  27178. 1
  27179. 1
  27180. 1
  27181. 1
  27182. 1
  27183. 1
  27184. 1
  27185. 1
  27186. 1
  27187. 1
  27188. 1
  27189. 1
  27190. 1
  27191. 1
  27192. 1
  27193. 1
  27194. 1
  27195. 1
  27196. 1
  27197. 1
  27198. 1
  27199. 1
  27200. 1
  27201. 1
  27202. 1
  27203. 1
  27204. 1
  27205. 1
  27206. 1
  27207. 1
  27208. 1
  27209. 1
  27210. 1
  27211. 1
  27212. 1
  27213. 1
  27214. 1
  27215. 1
  27216. 1
  27217. 1
  27218. 1
  27219. 1
  27220. 1
  27221. 1
  27222. 1
  27223. 1
  27224. 1
  27225. 1
  27226. 1
  27227. 1
  27228. 1
  27229. 1
  27230. 1
  27231. 1
  27232. 1
  27233. 1
  27234. 1
  27235. 1
  27236. 1
  27237. 1
  27238. 1
  27239. 1
  27240. 1
  27241. 1
  27242. 1
  27243. 1
  27244. 1
  27245. 1
  27246. 1
  27247. 1
  27248. 1
  27249. 1
  27250. 1
  27251. 1
  27252. 1
  27253. 1
  27254. 1
  27255. 1
  27256. 1
  27257. 1
  27258. 1
  27259. 1
  27260. 1
  27261. 1
  27262. 1
  27263. 1
  27264. 1
  27265. 1
  27266. 1
  27267. 1
  27268. 1
  27269. 1
  27270. 1
  27271. 1
  27272. 1
  27273. 1
  27274. 1
  27275. 1
  27276. 1
  27277. 1
  27278. 1
  27279. 1
  27280. 1
  27281. 1
  27282. 1
  27283. 1
  27284. 1
  27285. 1
  27286. 1
  27287. 1
  27288. 1
  27289. 1
  27290. 1
  27291. 1
  27292. 1
  27293. 1
  27294. 1
  27295. 1
  27296. 1
  27297. 1
  27298. 1
  27299. 1
  27300. 1
  27301. 1
  27302. 1
  27303. 1
  27304. 1
  27305. 1
  27306. 1
  27307. 1
  27308. 1
  27309. 1
  27310. 1
  27311. 1
  27312. 1
  27313. 1
  27314. 1
  27315. 1
  27316. 1
  27317. 1
  27318. 1
  27319. 1
  27320. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  27321. 1
  27322. 1
  27323. 1
  27324. 1
  27325. 1
  27326. 1
  27327. 1
  27328. 1
  27329. 1
  27330. 1
  27331. 1
  27332. 1
  27333. 1
  27334. 1
  27335. 1
  27336. 1
  27337. 1
  27338. 1
  27339. 1
  27340. 1
  27341. 1
  27342. 1
  27343. 1
  27344. 1
  27345. 1
  27346. 1
  27347. 1
  27348. 1
  27349. 1
  27350. 1
  27351. 1
  27352. 1
  27353. 1
  27354. 1
  27355. 1
  27356. 1
  27357. 1
  27358. 1
  27359. 1
  27360. 1
  27361. 1
  27362. 1
  27363. 1
  27364. 1
  27365. 1
  27366. 1
  27367. 1
  27368. 1
  27369. 1
  27370. 1
  27371. 1
  27372. 1
  27373. 1
  27374. 1
  27375. 1
  27376. 1
  27377. 1
  27378. 1
  27379. 1
  27380. 1
  27381. 1
  27382. 1
  27383. 1
  27384. 1
  27385. 1
  27386. 1
  27387. 1
  27388. 1
  27389. 1
  27390. 1
  27391. 1
  27392. 1
  27393. 1
  27394. 1
  27395. 1
  27396. 1
  27397. 1
  27398. 1
  27399. 1
  27400. 1
  27401. 1
  27402. 1
  27403. 1
  27404. 1
  27405. 1
  27406. 1
  27407. 1
  27408. 1
  27409. 1
  27410. 1
  27411. 1
  27412. 1
  27413. 1
  27414. 1
  27415. 1
  27416. 1
  27417. 1
  27418. 1
  27419. 1
  27420. 1
  27421. 1
  27422. 1
  27423. 1
  27424. 1
  27425. 1
  27426. 1
  27427. 1
  27428. 1
  27429. 1
  27430. 1
  27431. 1
  27432. 1
  27433. 1
  27434. 1
  27435. 1
  27436. 1
  27437. 1
  27438. 1
  27439. 1
  27440. 1
  27441. 1
  27442. 1
  27443. 1
  27444. 1
  27445. 1
  27446. 1
  27447. 1
  27448. 1
  27449. 1
  27450. 1
  27451. 1
  27452. 1
  27453. 1
  27454. 1
  27455. 1
  27456. 1
  27457. 1
  27458. 1
  27459. 1
  27460. 1
  27461. 1
  27462. 1
  27463. 1
  27464. 1
  27465. 1
  27466. 1
  27467. 1
  27468. 1
  27469. 1
  27470. 1
  27471. 1
  27472. 1
  27473. 1
  27474. 1
  27475. 1
  27476. 1
  27477. 1
  27478. 1
  27479. 1
  27480. 1
  27481. 1
  27482. 1
  27483. 1
  27484. 1
  27485. 1
  27486. 1
  27487. 1
  27488. 1
  27489. 1
  27490. 1
  27491. 1
  27492. 1
  27493. 1
  27494. 1
  27495. 🤣You are late by 30years to report... 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  27496. 1
  27497. 1
  27498. 1
  27499. 1
  27500. 1
  27501. 1
  27502. 1
  27503. 1
  27504. 1
  27505. 1
  27506. 1
  27507. 1
  27508. 1
  27509. 1
  27510. 1
  27511. 1
  27512. 1
  27513. 1
  27514. 1
  27515. 1
  27516. 1
  27517. 1
  27518. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  27519. 1
  27520. 1
  27521. 1
  27522. 1
  27523. 1
  27524. 1
  27525. 1
  27526. 1
  27527. 1
  27528. 1
  27529. 1
  27530. 1
  27531. 1
  27532. 1
  27533. 1
  27534. 1
  27535. 1
  27536. 1
  27537. 1
  27538. 1
  27539. 1
  27540. 1
  27541. 1
  27542. 1
  27543. 1
  27544. 1
  27545. 1
  27546. 1
  27547. 1
  27548. 1
  27549. 1
  27550. 1
  27551. 1
  27552. 1
  27553. 1
  27554. 1
  27555. 1
  27556. 1
  27557. 1
  27558. 1
  27559. 1
  27560. 1
  27561. 1
  27562. 1
  27563. 1
  27564. 1
  27565. 1
  27566. 1
  27567. 1
  27568. 1
  27569. 1
  27570. 1
  27571. 1
  27572. 1
  27573. 1
  27574. 1
  27575. 1
  27576. 1
  27577. 1
  27578. 1
  27579. 1
  27580. 1
  27581. 1
  27582. 1
  27583. 1
  27584. 1
  27585. 1
  27586. 1
  27587. 1
  27588. 1
  27589. 1
  27590. 1
  27591. 1
  27592. 1
  27593. 1
  27594. 1
  27595. 1
  27596. 1
  27597. 1
  27598. 1
  27599. 1
  27600. 1
  27601. 1
  27602. 1
  27603. 1
  27604. 1
  27605. 1
  27606. 1
  27607. 1
  27608. 1
  27609. 1
  27610. 1
  27611. 1
  27612. 1
  27613. 1
  27614. 1
  27615. 1
  27616. 1
  27617. 1
  27618. 1
  27619. 1
  27620. 1
  27621. 1
  27622. 1
  27623. 1
  27624. 1
  27625. 1
  27626. 1
  27627. 1
  27628. 1
  27629. 1
  27630. 1
  27631. 1
  27632. 1
  27633. 1
  27634. 1
  27635. 1
  27636. 1
  27637. 1
  27638. 1
  27639. 1
  27640. 1
  27641. 1
  27642. 1
  27643. 1
  27644. 1
  27645. 1
  27646. 1
  27647. 1
  27648. 1
  27649. 1
  27650. 1
  27651. 1
  27652. 1
  27653. 1
  27654. 1
  27655. 1
  27656. 1
  27657. 1
  27658. 1
  27659. 1
  27660. 1
  27661. 1
  27662. 1
  27663. 1
  27664. 1
  27665. 1
  27666. 1
  27667. 1
  27668. 1
  27669. 1
  27670. 1
  27671. 1
  27672. 1
  27673. 1
  27674. 1
  27675. 1
  27676. 1
  27677. 1
  27678. 1
  27679. 1
  27680. 1
  27681. 1
  27682. 1
  27683. 1
  27684. 1
  27685. 1
  27686. 1
  27687. 1
  27688. 1
  27689. 1
  27690. 1
  27691. 1
  27692. 1
  27693. 1
  27694. 1
  27695. 1
  27696. 1
  27697. 1
  27698. 1
  27699. 1
  27700. 1
  27701. 1
  27702. 1
  27703. 1
  27704. 1
  27705. 1
  27706. 1
  27707. 1
  27708. 1
  27709. 1
  27710. 1
  27711. 1
  27712. 1
  27713. 1
  27714. 1
  27715. 1
  27716. 1
  27717. 1
  27718. 1
  27719. 1
  27720. 1
  27721. 1
  27722. 1
  27723. 1
  27724. 1
  27725. 1
  27726. 1
  27727. 1
  27728. 1
  27729. 1
  27730. 1
  27731. 1
  27732. 1
  27733. 1
  27734. 1
  27735. 1
  27736. 1
  27737. 1
  27738. 1
  27739. 1
  27740. 1
  27741. 1
  27742. 1
  27743. 1
  27744. 1
  27745. 1
  27746. 1
  27747. 1
  27748. 1
  27749. 1
  27750. 1
  27751. 1
  27752. 1
  27753. 1
  27754. 1
  27755. 1
  27756. 1
  27757. 1
  27758. 1
  27759. 1
  27760. 1
  27761. 1
  27762. 1
  27763. 1
  27764. 1
  27765. 1
  27766. 1
  27767. 1
  27768. 1
  27769. 1
  27770. 1
  27771. 1
  27772. 1
  27773. 1
  27774. 1
  27775. 1
  27776. 1
  27777. 1
  27778. 1
  27779. 1
  27780. 1
  27781. 1
  27782. 1
  27783. 1
  27784. 1
  27785. 1
  27786. 1
  27787. 1
  27788. 1
  27789. 1
  27790. 1
  27791. 1
  27792. 1
  27793. 1
  27794. 1
  27795. 1
  27796. 1
  27797. 1
  27798. 1
  27799. 1
  27800. 1
  27801. 1
  27802. 1
  27803. 1
  27804. 1
  27805. 1
  27806. 1
  27807. 1
  27808. 1
  27809. 1
  27810. 1
  27811. 1
  27812. 1
  27813. 1
  27814. 1
  27815. 1
  27816. 1
  27817. 1
  27818. 1
  27819. 1
  27820. 1
  27821. 1
  27822. 1
  27823. 1
  27824. 1
  27825. 1
  27826. 1
  27827. 1
  27828. 1
  27829. 1
  27830. 1
  27831. 1
  27832. 1
  27833. 1
  27834. 1
  27835. 1
  27836. 1
  27837. 1
  27838. 1
  27839. 1
  27840. 1
  27841. 1
  27842. 1
  27843. 1
  27844. 1
  27845. 1
  27846. 1
  27847. 1
  27848. 1
  27849. 1
  27850. 1
  27851. 1
  27852. 1
  27853. 1
  27854. 1
  27855. 1
  27856. 1
  27857. 1
  27858. 1
  27859. 1
  27860. 1
  27861. 1
  27862. 1
  27863. 1
  27864. 1
  27865. 1
  27866. 1
  27867. 1
  27868. 1
  27869. 1
  27870. 1
  27871. 1
  27872. 1
  27873. 1
  27874. 1
  27875. 1
  27876. 1
  27877. 1
  27878. 1
  27879. 1
  27880. 1
  27881. 1
  27882. 1
  27883. 1
  27884. 1
  27885. 1
  27886. 1
  27887. 1
  27888. 1
  27889. 1
  27890. 1
  27891. 1
  27892. 1
  27893. 1
  27894. 1
  27895. 1
  27896. 1
  27897. 1
  27898. 1
  27899. 1
  27900. 1
  27901. 1
  27902. 1
  27903. 1
  27904. 1
  27905. 1
  27906. 1
  27907. 1
  27908. 1
  27909. 1
  27910. 1
  27911. 1
  27912. 1
  27913. 1
  27914. 1
  27915. 1
  27916. 1
  27917. 1
  27918. 1
  27919. 1
  27920. 1
  27921. 1
  27922. 1
  27923. 1
  27924. 1
  27925. 1
  27926. 1
  27927. 1
  27928. 1
  27929. 1
  27930. 1
  27931. 1
  27932. 1
  27933. 1
  27934. 1
  27935. 1
  27936. 1
  27937. 1
  27938. 1
  27939. 1
  27940. 1
  27941. 1
  27942. 1
  27943. 1
  27944. 1
  27945. 1
  27946. 1
  27947. 1
  27948. 1
  27949. 1
  27950. 1
  27951. 1
  27952. 1
  27953. 1
  27954. 1
  27955. 1
  27956. 1
  27957. 1
  27958. 1
  27959. 1
  27960. 1
  27961. 1
  27962. 1
  27963. 1
  27964. 1
  27965. 1
  27966. 1
  27967. 1
  27968. 1
  27969. 1
  27970. 1
  27971. 1
  27972. 1
  27973. 1
  27974. 1
  27975. 1
  27976. 1
  27977. 1
  27978. 1
  27979. 1
  27980. 1
  27981. 1
  27982. 1
  27983. 1
  27984. 1
  27985. 1
  27986. 1
  27987. 1
  27988. 1
  27989. 1
  27990. 1
  27991. 1
  27992. 1
  27993. 1
  27994. 1
  27995. 1
  27996. 1
  27997. 1
  27998. 1
  27999. 1
  28000. 1
  28001. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  28002. 1
  28003. 1
  28004. 1
  28005. 1
  28006. 1
  28007. 1
  28008. 1
  28009. 1
  28010. 1
  28011. 1
  28012. 1
  28013. 1
  28014. 1
  28015. 1
  28016. 1
  28017. 1
  28018. 1
  28019. 1
  28020. 1
  28021. 1
  28022. 1
  28023. 1
  28024. 1
  28025. 1
  28026. 1
  28027. 1
  28028. 1
  28029. 1
  28030. 1
  28031. 1
  28032. 1
  28033. 1
  28034. 1
  28035. 1
  28036. 1
  28037. 1
  28038. 1
  28039. 1
  28040. 1
  28041. 1
  28042. 1
  28043. 1
  28044. 1
  28045. 1
  28046. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  28047. 1
  28048. 1
  28049. 1
  28050. 1
  28051. 1
  28052. 1
  28053. 1
  28054. 1
  28055. 1
  28056. 1
  28057. 1
  28058. 1
  28059. 1
  28060. 1
  28061. 1
  28062. 1
  28063. 1
  28064. 1
  28065. 1
  28066. 1
  28067. 1
  28068. 1
  28069. 1
  28070. 1
  28071. 1
  28072. 1
  28073. 1
  28074. 1
  28075. 1
  28076. 1
  28077. 1
  28078. 1
  28079. 1
  28080. 1
  28081. 1
  28082. 1
  28083. 1
  28084. 1
  28085. 1
  28086. 1
  28087. 1
  28088. 1
  28089. 1
  28090. 1
  28091. 1
  28092. 1
  28093. 1
  28094. 1
  28095. 1
  28096. 1
  28097. 1
  28098. 1
  28099. 1
  28100. 1
  28101. 1
  28102. 1
  28103. 1
  28104. 1
  28105. 1
  28106. 1
  28107. 1
  28108. 1
  28109. 1
  28110. 1
  28111. 1
  28112. 1
  28113. 1
  28114. 1
  28115. 1
  28116. 1
  28117. 1
  28118. 1
  28119. 1
  28120. 1
  28121. 1
  28122. 1
  28123. 1
  28124. 1
  28125. 1
  28126. 1
  28127. 1
  28128. 1
  28129. 1
  28130. 1
  28131. 1
  28132. 1
  28133. 1
  28134. 1
  28135. 1
  28136. 1
  28137. 1
  28138. 1
  28139. 1
  28140. 1
  28141. 1
  28142. 1
  28143. 1
  28144. 1
  28145. 1
  28146. 1
  28147. 1
  28148. 1
  28149. 1
  28150. 1
  28151. 1
  28152. 1
  28153. 1
  28154. 1
  28155. 1
  28156. 1
  28157. 1
  28158. 1
  28159. 1
  28160. 1
  28161. 1
  28162. 1
  28163. 1
  28164. 1
  28165. 1
  28166. 1
  28167. 1
  28168. 1
  28169. 1
  28170. 1
  28171. 1
  28172. 1
  28173. 1
  28174. 1
  28175. 1
  28176. 1
  28177. 1
  28178. 1
  28179. 1
  28180. 1
  28181. 1
  28182. 1
  28183. 1
  28184. 1
  28185. 1
  28186. 1
  28187. 1
  28188. 1
  28189. 1
  28190. 1
  28191. 1
  28192. 1
  28193. 1
  28194. 1
  28195. 1
  28196. 1
  28197. 1
  28198. 1
  28199. 1
  28200. 1
  28201. 1
  28202. 1
  28203. 1
  28204. 1
  28205. 1
  28206. 1
  28207. 1
  28208. 1
  28209. 1
  28210. 1
  28211. 1
  28212. 1
  28213. 1
  28214. 1
  28215. 1
  28216. 1
  28217. 1
  28218. 1
  28219. 1
  28220. 1
  28221. 1
  28222. 1
  28223. 1
  28224. 1
  28225. 1
  28226. 1
  28227. 1
  28228. 1
  28229. 1
  28230. 1
  28231. 1
  28232. 1
  28233. 1
  28234. 1
  28235. 1
  28236. 1
  28237. 1
  28238. 1
  28239. 1
  28240. 1
  28241. 1
  28242. 1
  28243. 1
  28244. 1
  28245. 1
  28246. 1
  28247. 1
  28248. 1
  28249. 1
  28250. 1
  28251. 1
  28252. 1
  28253. 1
  28254. 1
  28255. 1
  28256. 1
  28257. 1
  28258. 1
  28259. 1
  28260. 1
  28261. 1
  28262. 1
  28263. 1
  28264. 1
  28265. 1
  28266. 1
  28267. 1
  28268. 1
  28269. 1
  28270. 1
  28271. 1
  28272. 1
  28273. 1
  28274. 1
  28275. 1
  28276. 1
  28277. 1
  28278. 1
  28279. 1
  28280. 1
  28281. 1
  28282. 1
  28283. 1
  28284. 1
  28285. 1
  28286. 1
  28287. 1
  28288. 1
  28289. 1
  28290. 1
  28291. 1
  28292. 1
  28293. 1
  28294. 1
  28295. 1
  28296. 1
  28297. 1
  28298. 1
  28299. 1
  28300. 1
  28301. 1
  28302. 1
  28303. 1
  28304. 1
  28305. 1
  28306. 1
  28307. 1
  28308. 1
  28309. 1
  28310. 1
  28311. 1
  28312. 1
  28313. 1
  28314. 1
  28315. 1
  28316. 1
  28317. 1
  28318. 1
  28319. 1
  28320. 1
  28321. 1
  28322. 1
  28323. 1
  28324. 1
  28325. 1
  28326. 1
  28327. 1
  28328. 1
  28329. 1
  28330. 1
  28331. 1
  28332. 1
  28333. 1
  28334. 1
  28335. 1
  28336. 1
  28337. 1
  28338. 1
  28339. 1
  28340. 1
  28341. 1
  28342. 1
  28343. 1
  28344. 1
  28345. 1
  28346. 1
  28347. 1
  28348. 1
  28349. 1
  28350. 1
  28351. 1
  28352. 1
  28353. 1
  28354. 1
  28355. 1
  28356. 1
  28357. 1
  28358. 1
  28359. 1
  28360. 1
  28361. 1
  28362. 1
  28363. 1
  28364. 1
  28365. 1
  28366. 1
  28367. 1
  28368. 1
  28369. 1
  28370. 1
  28371. 1
  28372. 1
  28373. 1
  28374. 1
  28375. 1
  28376. 1
  28377. 1
  28378. 1
  28379. 1
  28380. 1
  28381. 1
  28382. 1
  28383. 1
  28384. 1
  28385. 1
  28386. 1
  28387. 1
  28388. 1
  28389. 1
  28390. 1
  28391. 1
  28392. 1
  28393. 1
  28394. 1
  28395. 1
  28396. 1
  28397. 1
  28398. 1
  28399. 1
  28400. 1
  28401. 1
  28402. 1
  28403. 1
  28404. 1
  28405. 1
  28406. 1
  28407. 1
  28408. 1
  28409. 1
  28410. 1
  28411. 1
  28412. 1
  28413. 1
  28414. 1
  28415. 1
  28416. 1
  28417. 1
  28418. 1
  28419. 1
  28420. 1
  28421. 1
  28422. 1
  28423. 1
  28424. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  28425. 1
  28426. 1
  28427. 1
  28428. 1
  28429. 1
  28430. 1
  28431. 1
  28432. 1
  28433. 1
  28434. 1
  28435. 1
  28436. 1
  28437. 1
  28438. 1
  28439. 1
  28440. 1
  28441. 1
  28442. 1
  28443. 1
  28444. 1
  28445. 1
  28446. 1
  28447. 1
  28448. 1
  28449. 1
  28450. 1
  28451. 1
  28452. 1
  28453. 1
  28454. 1
  28455. 1
  28456. 1
  28457. 1
  28458. 1
  28459. 1
  28460. 1
  28461. 1
  28462. 1
  28463. 1
  28464. 1
  28465. 1
  28466. 1
  28467. 1
  28468. 1
  28469. 1
  28470. 1
  28471. 1
  28472. 1
  28473. 1
  28474. 1
  28475. 1
  28476. 1
  28477. 1
  28478. 1
  28479. 1
  28480. 1
  28481. 1
  28482. 1
  28483. 1
  28484. 1
  28485. 1
  28486. 1
  28487. 1
  28488. 1
  28489. 1
  28490. 1
  28491. 1
  28492. 1
  28493. 1
  28494. 1
  28495. 1
  28496. 1
  28497. 1
  28498. 1
  28499. 1
  28500. 1
  28501. 1
  28502. 1
  28503. 1
  28504. 1
  28505. 1
  28506. 1
  28507. 1
  28508. 1
  28509. 1
  28510. 1
  28511. 1
  28512. 1
  28513. 1
  28514. 1
  28515. 1
  28516. 1
  28517. 1
  28518. 1
  28519. 1
  28520. 1
  28521. 1
  28522. 1
  28523. 1
  28524. 1
  28525. 1
  28526. 1
  28527. 1
  28528. 1
  28529. 1
  28530. 1
  28531. 1
  28532. 1
  28533. 1
  28534. 1
  28535. 1
  28536. 1
  28537. 1
  28538. ​ From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    1
  28539. 1
  28540. 1
  28541. 1
  28542. 1
  28543. 1
  28544. 1
  28545. 1
  28546. 1
  28547. 1
  28548. 1
  28549. 1
  28550. 1
  28551. 1
  28552. 1
  28553. 1
  28554. 1
  28555. 1
  28556. 1
  28557. 1
  28558. 1
  28559. 1
  28560. 1
  28561. 1
  28562. 1
  28563. 1
  28564. 1
  28565. 1
  28566. 1
  28567. 1
  28568. 1
  28569. 1
  28570. 1
  28571. 1
  28572. 1
  28573. 1
  28574. 1
  28575. 1
  28576. 1
  28577. 1
  28578. 1
  28579. 1
  28580. 1
  28581. 1
  28582. 1
  28583. 1
  28584. 1
  28585. 1
  28586. 1
  28587. 1
  28588. 1
  28589. 1
  28590. 1
  28591. 1
  28592. 1
  28593. 1
  28594. 1
  28595. 1
  28596. 1
  28597. 1
  28598. 1
  28599. 1
  28600. 1
  28601. 1
  28602. 1
  28603. 1
  28604. 1
  28605. 1
  28606. 1
  28607. 1
  28608. 1
  28609. 1
  28610. 1
  28611. 1
  28612. 1
  28613. 1
  28614. 1
  28615. 1
  28616. 1
  28617. 1
  28618. 1
  28619. 1
  28620. 1
  28621. 1
  28622. 1
  28623. 1
  28624. 1
  28625. 1
  28626. 1
  28627. 1
  28628. 1
  28629. 1
  28630. 1
  28631. 1
  28632. 1
  28633. 1
  28634. 1
  28635. 1
  28636. 1
  28637. 1
  28638. 1
  28639. 1
  28640. 1
  28641. 1
  28642. 1
  28643. 1
  28644. 1
  28645. 1
  28646. 1
  28647. 1
  28648. 1
  28649. 1
  28650. 1
  28651. 1
  28652. 1
  28653. 1
  28654. 1
  28655. 1
  28656. 1
  28657. 1
  28658. 1
  28659. 1
  28660. 1
  28661. 1
  28662. 1
  28663. 1
  28664. 1
  28665. 1
  28666. 1
  28667. 1
  28668. 1
  28669. 1
  28670. 1
  28671. 1
  28672. 1
  28673. 1
  28674. 1
  28675. 1
  28676. 1
  28677. 1
  28678. 1
  28679. 1
  28680. 1
  28681. 1
  28682. 1
  28683. 1
  28684. 1
  28685. 1
  28686. 1
  28687. 1
  28688. 1
  28689. 1
  28690. 1
  28691. 1
  28692. 1
  28693. 1
  28694. 1
  28695. 1
  28696. 1
  28697. 1
  28698. 1
  28699. 1
  28700. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  28701. 1
  28702. 1
  28703. 1
  28704. 1
  28705. 1
  28706. 1
  28707. 1
  28708. 1
  28709. 1
  28710. 1
  28711. 1
  28712. 1
  28713. 1
  28714. 1
  28715. 1
  28716. 1
  28717. 1
  28718. 1
  28719. 1
  28720. 1
  28721. 1
  28722. 1
  28723. 1
  28724. 1
  28725. 1
  28726. 1
  28727. 1
  28728. 1
  28729. 1
  28730. 1
  28731. 1
  28732. 1
  28733. 1
  28734. 1
  28735. 1
  28736. 1
  28737. 1
  28738. 1
  28739. 1
  28740. 1
  28741. 1
  28742. 1
  28743. 1
  28744. 1
  28745. 1
  28746. 1
  28747. 1
  28748. 1
  28749. 1
  28750. 1
  28751. 1
  28752. 1
  28753. 1
  28754. 1
  28755. 1
  28756. 1
  28757. 1
  28758. 1
  28759. 1
  28760. 1
  28761. 1
  28762. 1
  28763. 1
  28764. 1
  28765. 1
  28766. 1
  28767. 1
  28768. 1
  28769. From American taxpayer news. WEAPONS THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T NEED AT PRICES WE CAN’T AFFORD The next level of Pentagon waste involves weapons we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, systems that, for staggering sums, fail to deliver on promises to enhance our safety and security. The poster child for such costly, dysfunctional systems is the F-35 combat aircraft, a plane tasked with multiple missions, none of which it does well. The Pentagon is slated to buy more than 2,400 F-35s for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The estimated lifetime cost for procuring and operating those planes, a mere $1.7 trillion, would make it the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons project ever. Once upon a time (as in some fairy tale), the idea behind the creation of the F-35 was to build a plane that, in several variations, would be able to carry out many different tasks relatively cheaply, with potential savings generated by economies of scale. Theoretically, that meant the bulk of the parts for the thousands of planes to be built would be the same for all of them. This approach has proven a dismal failure so far, so much so that the researchers at POGO are convinced the F-35 may never be fully ready for combat. Its failures are too numerous to recount here, but a few examples should suffice to suggest why the program minimally needs to be scaled back in a major way, if not canceled completely. For a start, though meant to provide air support for troops on the ground, it’s proved anything but well-designed to do so. In fact, that job is already handled far better and more cheaply by the existing A-10 “Warthog” attack aircraft. A 2021 Pentagon assessment of the F-35—and keep in mind that this is the Department of Defense, not some outside expert— found 800 unresolved defects in the plane. Typical of its never-ending problems: a wildly expensive and not particularly functional high-tech helmet that, at the cost of $400,000 each, is meant to give its pilot special awareness of what’s happening around and below the plane as well as to the horizon. And don’t forget that the F-35 will be staggeringly expensive to maintain and already costs an impressive $38,000 an hour to fly. In December 2020, House Armed Services Committee chair Adam Smith finally claimed he was “tired of pouring money down the F-35 rathole.” Even former Air Force chief of staff General Charles Brown acknowledged that it couldn’t meet its original goal—to be a low-cost fighter—and would have to be supplemented with a less costly plane. He compared it to a Ferrari, adding, “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” It was a stunning admission, given the original claims that the F-35 would be the Air Force’s affordable, lightweight fighter and the ultimate workhorse for future air operations.
    1
  28770. 1
  28771. 1
  28772. 1
  28773. 1
  28774. 1
  28775. 1
  28776. 1
  28777. 1
  28778. 1
  28779. 1
  28780. 1
  28781. 1
  28782. 1
  28783. 1
  28784. 1
  28785. 1
  28786. 1
  28787. 1
  28788. 1
  28789. 1
  28790. 1
  28791. 1
  28792. 1
  28793. 1
  28794. 1
  28795. 1
  28796. 1
  28797. 1
  28798. 1
  28799. 1
  28800. 1
  28801. 1
  28802. 1
  28803. 1
  28804. 1
  28805. 1
  28806. 1
  28807. 1
  28808. 1
  28809. 1
  28810. 1
  28811. 1
  28812. 1
  28813. 1
  28814. 1
  28815. 1
  28816. 1
  28817. 1
  28818. 1
  28819. 1
  28820. 1
  28821. 1
  28822. 1
  28823. 1
  28824. 1
  28825. 1
  28826. 1
  28827. 1
  28828. 1
  28829. 1
  28830. 1
  28831. 1
  28832. 1
  28833. 1
  28834. 1
  28835. 1
  28836. 1
  28837. 1
  28838. 1
  28839. 1
  28840. 1
  28841. 1
  28842. 1
  28843. 1
  28844. 1
  28845. 1
  28846. 1
  28847. 1
  28848. 1
  28849. 1
  28850. 1
  28851. 1
  28852. 1
  28853. 1
  28854. 1
  28855. 1
  28856. 1
  28857. 1
  28858. 1
  28859. 1
  28860. 1
  28861. 1
  28862. 1
  28863. 1
  28864. 1
  28865. 1
  28866. 1
  28867. 1
  28868. 1
  28869. 1
  28870. 1
  28871. 1
  28872. 1
  28873. 1
  28874. 1
  28875. 1
  28876. 1
  28877. 1
  28878. 1
  28879. 1
  28880. 1
  28881. 1
  28882. 1
  28883. 1
  28884. 1
  28885. 1
  28886. 1
  28887. 1
  28888. 1
  28889. 1
  28890. 1
  28891. 1
  28892. 1
  28893. 1
  28894. 1
  28895. 1
  28896. 1
  28897. 1
  28898. 1
  28899. 1
  28900. 1
  28901. 1
  28902. 1
  28903. 1
  28904. 1
  28905. 1
  28906. 1
  28907. 1
  28908. 1
  28909. 1
  28910. 1
  28911. 1
  28912. 1
  28913. 1
  28914. 1
  28915. 1
  28916. 1
  28917. 1
  28918. 1
  28919. 1
  28920. 1
  28921. 1
  28922. 1
  28923. 1
  28924. 1
  28925. 1
  28926. 1
  28927. 1
  28928. 1
  28929. 1
  28930. 1
  28931. 1
  28932. 1
  28933. 1
  28934. 1
  28935. 1
  28936. 1
  28937. 1
  28938. 1
  28939. 1
  28940. 1
  28941. 1
  28942. 1
  28943. 1
  28944. 1
  28945. 1
  28946. 1
  28947. 1
  28948. 1
  28949. 1
  28950. 1
  28951. 1
  28952. 1
  28953. 1
  28954. 1
  28955. 1
  28956. 1
  28957. 1
  28958. 1
  28959. 1
  28960. 1
  28961. 1
  28962. 1
  28963. 1
  28964. 1
  28965. 1
  28966. 1
  28967. 1
  28968. 1
  28969. 1
  28970. 1
  28971. 1
  28972. 1
  28973. 1
  28974. 1
  28975. 1
  28976. 1
  28977. 1
  28978. 1
  28979. 1
  28980. 1
  28981. 1
  28982. 1
  28983. 1
  28984. 1
  28985. 1
  28986. 1
  28987. 1
  28988. 1
  28989. 1
  28990. 1
  28991. 1
  28992. 1
  28993. 1
  28994. 1
  28995. 1
  28996. 1
  28997. 1
  28998. 1
  28999. 1
  29000. 1
  29001. 1
  29002. 1
  29003. 1
  29004. 1
  29005. 1
  29006. 1
  29007. 1
  29008. 1
  29009. 1
  29010. 1
  29011. 1
  29012. 1
  29013. 1
  29014. 1
  29015. 1
  29016. 1
  29017. 1
  29018. 1
  29019. 1
  29020. 1
  29021. 1
  29022. 1
  29023. 1
  29024. 1
  29025. 1
  29026. 1
  29027. 1
  29028. 1
  29029. 1
  29030. 1
  29031. 1
  29032. 1
  29033. 1
  29034. 1
  29035. 1
  29036. 1
  29037. 1
  29038. 1
  29039. 1
  29040. 1
  29041. 1
  29042. 1
  29043. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  29044. 1
  29045. 1
  29046. 1
  29047. 1
  29048. 1
  29049. 1
  29050. 1
  29051. 1
  29052. 1
  29053. 1
  29054. 1
  29055. 1
  29056. 1
  29057. 1
  29058. 1
  29059. 1
  29060. 1
  29061. 1
  29062. 1
  29063. 1
  29064. 1
  29065. 1
  29066. 1
  29067. 1
  29068. 1
  29069. 1
  29070. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29071. 1
  29072. 1
  29073. 1
  29074. 1
  29075.  @___Danny___  2020 On April 8, Singapore’s Ministry of Defense (MINDEF) and the Singaporean Armed Forces (SAF) held a video conference with counterparts from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to discuss bilateral efforts to combat the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The latest engagement comes amid strengthened military relations in recent years. Last October, Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and Singaporean Defense Minister Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) signed an updated Agreement on Defense Exchanges and Security Cooperation (ADESC, 國防交流與安全合作協定) that formalized military-to-military exchanges and bolstered China’s growing role as a military partner for Singapore. The agreement, signed on October 20, 2019, will include more frequent and high-level defense dialogues and larger-scale military exercises across the army, navy, and air force. The revised pact goes beyond the initial deal reached in 2008, which only saw limited and occasional defense exchanges. Despite the new defense agreement, the forty-year-old “Starlight Project” (星光計劃) between Taiwan and Singapore will remain operational, according to Taiwan’s Defense Minister Yen De-fa (嚴德發). Amid improved Singapore-China relations—including military ties—over the past few decades, Taipei does not want to lose more ground in the cross-Strait competition over Singapore. In particular, it wants to protect its flagship military exchange program, which has formed the crux of Taiwan-Singapore relations since the mid-1970s.
    1
  29076. 1
  29077. 1
  29078. 1
  29079. 1
  29080. 1
  29081. 1
  29082. 1
  29083. 1
  29084. 1
  29085. 1
  29086. 1
  29087. 1
  29088. 1
  29089. 1
  29090. 1
  29091. 1
  29092. 1
  29093. 1
  29094. 1
  29095. 1
  29096. 1
  29097. 1
  29098. 1
  29099. 1
  29100. 1
  29101. 1
  29102. 1
  29103. 1
  29104. 1
  29105. 1
  29106. 1
  29107. 1
  29108. 1
  29109. 1
  29110. 1
  29111. 1
  29112. 1
  29113. 1
  29114. 1
  29115. 1
  29116. 1
  29117. 1
  29118. 1
  29119. 1
  29120. 1
  29121. 1
  29122. 1
  29123. 1
  29124. 1
  29125. 1
  29126. 1
  29127. 1
  29128. 1
  29129. 1
  29130. 1
  29131. 1
  29132. 1
  29133. 1
  29134. 1
  29135. 1
  29136. 1
  29137. 1
  29138. 1
  29139. 1
  29140. 1
  29141. 1
  29142. 1
  29143. 1
  29144. 1
  29145. 1
  29146. 1
  29147. 1
  29148. 1
  29149. 1
  29150. 1
  29151. 1
  29152. 1
  29153. 1
  29154. 1
  29155. 1
  29156. 1
  29157. 1
  29158. 1
  29159. 1
  29160. 1
  29161. 1
  29162. 1
  29163. 1
  29164. 1
  29165. 1
  29166. 1
  29167. 1
  29168. 1
  29169. 1
  29170. 1
  29171. 1
  29172. 1
  29173. 1
  29174. 1
  29175. 1
  29176. 1
  29177. 1
  29178. 1
  29179. 1
  29180. 1
  29181. 1
  29182. 1
  29183. 1
  29184. 1
  29185. 1
  29186. 1
  29187. 1
  29188. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29189. 1
  29190. 1
  29191. 1
  29192. 1
  29193. 1
  29194. 1
  29195. 1
  29196. 1
  29197. 1
  29198. 1
  29199. 1
  29200. 1
  29201. 1
  29202. 1
  29203. 1
  29204. 1
  29205. 1
  29206. 1
  29207. 1
  29208. 1
  29209. 1
  29210. 1
  29211. 1
  29212. 1
  29213. 1
  29214. 1
  29215. 1
  29216. 1
  29217. 1
  29218. 1
  29219. 1
  29220. 1
  29221. 1
  29222. 1
  29223. 1
  29224. 1
  29225. 1
  29226. 1
  29227. 1
  29228. 1
  29229. 1
  29230. 1
  29231. 1
  29232. 1
  29233. 1
  29234. 1
  29235. 1
  29236. 1
  29237. 1
  29238. 1
  29239. 1
  29240. 1
  29241. 1
  29242. 1
  29243. 1
  29244. 1
  29245. 1
  29246. 1
  29247. 1
  29248. 1
  29249. 1
  29250. 1
  29251. 1
  29252. 1
  29253. 1
  29254. 1
  29255. 1
  29256. 1
  29257. 1
  29258. 1
  29259. 1
  29260. 1
  29261. 1
  29262. 1
  29263. 1
  29264. 1
  29265. 1
  29266. 1
  29267. 1
  29268. 1
  29269. 1
  29270. 1
  29271. 1
  29272. 1
  29273. 1
  29274. 1
  29275. 1
  29276. 1
  29277. 1
  29278. 1
  29279. 1
  29280. 1
  29281. 1
  29282. 1
  29283. 1
  29284. 1
  29285. 1
  29286. 1
  29287. 1
  29288. 1
  29289. 1
  29290. 1
  29291. 1
  29292. 1
  29293. 1
  29294. 1
  29295. 1
  29296. 1
  29297. 1
  29298. 1
  29299. 1
  29300. 1
  29301. 1
  29302. 1
  29303. 1
  29304. 1
  29305. 1
  29306. 1
  29307. 1
  29308. 1
  29309. 1
  29310. 1
  29311. 1
  29312. 1
  29313. 1
  29314. 1
  29315. 1
  29316. 1
  29317. 1
  29318. 1
  29319. 1
  29320. 1
  29321. 1
  29322. 1
  29323. 1
  29324. 1
  29325. 1
  29326. 1
  29327. 1
  29328. 1
  29329. 1
  29330. 1
  29331. 1
  29332. 1
  29333. 1
  29334. 1
  29335. 1
  29336. 1
  29337. 1
  29338. 1
  29339. 1
  29340. 1
  29341. 1
  29342. 1
  29343. 1
  29344. 1
  29345. 1
  29346. 1
  29347. 1
  29348. 1
  29349. 1
  29350. 1
  29351. 1
  29352. 1
  29353. 1
  29354. 1
  29355. 1
  29356. 1
  29357. 1
  29358. 1
  29359. 1
  29360. 1
  29361. 1
  29362. 1
  29363. 1
  29364. 1
  29365. 1
  29366. 1
  29367. 1
  29368. 1
  29369. 1
  29370. 1
  29371. 1
  29372. 1
  29373. 1
  29374. 1
  29375. 1
  29376. 1
  29377. 1
  29378. 1
  29379. 1
  29380. 1
  29381. 1
  29382. 1
  29383. 1
  29384. 1
  29385. 1
  29386. 1
  29387. 1
  29388. 1
  29389. 1
  29390. 1
  29391. 1
  29392. 1
  29393. 1
  29394. 1
  29395. 1
  29396. 1
  29397. 1
  29398. 1
  29399. 1
  29400. 1
  29401. 1
  29402. 1
  29403. 1
  29404. 1
  29405. 1
  29406. 1
  29407. 1
  29408. 1
  29409. 1
  29410. 1
  29411. 1
  29412. 1
  29413. 1
  29414. 1
  29415. 1
  29416. 1
  29417. 1
  29418. 1
  29419. 1
  29420. 1
  29421. 1
  29422. 1
  29423. 1
  29424. 1
  29425. 1
  29426. 1
  29427. 1
  29428. 1
  29429. 1
  29430. 1
  29431. 1
  29432. 1
  29433. 1
  29434. 1
  29435. 1
  29436. 1
  29437. 1
  29438. 1
  29439. 1
  29440. 1
  29441. 1
  29442. 1
  29443. 1
  29444. 1
  29445. 1
  29446. 1
  29447. 1
  29448. 1
  29449. 1
  29450. 1
  29451. 1
  29452. 1
  29453. 1
  29454. 1
  29455. 1
  29456. 1
  29457. 1
  29458. 1
  29459. 1
  29460. 1
  29461. 1
  29462. 1
  29463. 1
  29464. 1
  29465. 1
  29466. 1
  29467. 1
  29468. 1
  29469. 1
  29470. 1
  29471. 1
  29472. 1
  29473. 1
  29474. 1
  29475. 1
  29476. 1
  29477. 1
  29478. 1
  29479. 1
  29480. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29481. 1
  29482. 1
  29483. 1
  29484. 1
  29485. 1
  29486. 1
  29487. 1
  29488. 1
  29489. 1
  29490. 1
  29491. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  29492. 1
  29493. 1
  29494. 1
  29495. 1
  29496. 1
  29497. 1
  29498. 1
  29499. 1
  29500. 1
  29501. 1
  29502. 1
  29503. 1
  29504. 1
  29505. 1
  29506. 1
  29507. 1
  29508. 1
  29509. 1
  29510. 1
  29511. 1
  29512. 1
  29513. 1
  29514. 1
  29515. 1
  29516. 1
  29517. 1
  29518. 1
  29519. 1
  29520. 1
  29521. 1
  29522. 1
  29523. 1
  29524. 1
  29525. 1
  29526. 1
  29527. 1
  29528. 1
  29529. 1
  29530. 1
  29531. 1
  29532. 1
  29533. 1
  29534. 1
  29535. 1
  29536. 1
  29537. 1
  29538. 1
  29539. 1
  29540. 1
  29541. 1
  29542. 1
  29543. 1
  29544. 1
  29545. 1
  29546. 1
  29547. 1
  29548. 1
  29549. 1
  29550. 1
  29551. 1
  29552. 1
  29553. 1
  29554. 1
  29555. 1
  29556. 1
  29557. 1
  29558. 1
  29559. 1
  29560. 1
  29561. 1
  29562. 1
  29563. 1
  29564. 1
  29565. 1
  29566. 1
  29567. 1
  29568. 1
  29569. 1
  29570. 1
  29571. 1
  29572. 1
  29573. 1
  29574. 1
  29575. 1
  29576. 1
  29577. 1
  29578. 1
  29579. 1
  29580. 1
  29581. 1
  29582. 1
  29583. 1
  29584. 1
  29585. 1
  29586. 1
  29587. 1
  29588. 1
  29589. 1
  29590. 1
  29591. 1
  29592. 1
  29593. 1
  29594. 1
  29595. 1
  29596. 1
  29597. 1
  29598. 1
  29599. 1
  29600. 1
  29601. 1
  29602. 1
  29603. 1
  29604. 1
  29605. 1
  29606. 1
  29607. 1
  29608. 1
  29609. 1
  29610. 1
  29611. 1
  29612. 1
  29613. 1
  29614. 1
  29615. 1
  29616. 1
  29617. 1
  29618. 1
  29619. 1
  29620. 1
  29621. 1
  29622. 1
  29623. 1
  29624. 1
  29625. 1
  29626. 1
  29627. 1
  29628. 1
  29629. 1
  29630. 1
  29631. 1
  29632. 1
  29633. 1
  29634. 1
  29635. 1
  29636. 1
  29637. 1
  29638. 1
  29639. 1
  29640. 1
  29641. 1
  29642. 1
  29643. 1
  29644. 1
  29645. 1
  29646. South Africans Demands UK to return diamonds in King Charles crown jewels Some South Africans are calling on the United Kingdom to return the world's largest diamond, known as the Star of Africa, to its rightful place in South Africa. The diamond is currently set in the royal sceptre that King Charles III coronation will hold on Saturday, May 6th, 2023. According to the Royal Collection Trust, which oversees the royal collection of the British royal family, the Cullinan diamond was presented to King Edward VII (the British monarch at the time) in 1907, two years after its discovery in a private mine in South Africa's old Transvaal province. Now amid a global conversation about returning artwork and artefacts that were stolen during colonial times, some South Africans are calling for the diamond to be brought back. “The diamond needs to come to South Africa. It needs to be a sign of our pride, our heritage and our culture,” said Mothusi Kamanga, a lawyer and activist in Johannesburg who has promoted an online petition, which has gathered about 8,000 signatures, for the diamond to be returned. “I think generally the African people are starting to realize that to decolonise is not just to let people have certain freedoms, but it’s also to take back what has been expropriated from us.” The diamond in the sceptre, officially known as Cullinan I, was cut from the Cullinan diamond, a 3,100-carat stone mined near Pretoria. Cullinan II, a lesser diamond cut from the same stone, sits in the Imperial State Crown, which British monarchs wear on formal occasions. It is stored at the Tower of London with the other crown jewels, together with the sceptre. Ironically, only a replica of the whole Cullinan diamond, which is about the size of a man’s fist, is displayed at the Cape Town Diamond Museum.
    1
  29647. 1
  29648. 1
  29649. 1
  29650. 1
  29651. 1
  29652. 1
  29653. 1
  29654. 1
  29655. 1
  29656. 1
  29657. 1
  29658. 1
  29659. 1
  29660. 1
  29661. 1
  29662. 1
  29663. 1
  29664. 1
  29665. 1
  29666. 1
  29667. 1
  29668. 1
  29669. 1
  29670. 1
  29671. 1
  29672. 1
  29673. 1
  29674. 1
  29675. 1
  29676. 1
  29677. 1
  29678. 1
  29679. 1
  29680. 1
  29681. 1
  29682. 1
  29683. 1
  29684. 1
  29685. 1
  29686. 1
  29687. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29688. 1
  29689. 1
  29690. 1
  29691. 1
  29692. 1
  29693. 1
  29694. 1
  29695. 1
  29696. 1
  29697. 1
  29698. 1
  29699. 1
  29700. 1
  29701. 1
  29702. 1
  29703. 1
  29704. 1
  29705. 1
  29706. 1
  29707. 1
  29708. 1
  29709. 1
  29710. 1
  29711. 1
  29712. 1
  29713. 1
  29714. 1
  29715. 1
  29716. 1
  29717. 1
  29718. 1
  29719. 1
  29720. 1
  29721. 1
  29722. 1
  29723. 1
  29724. 1
  29725. 1
  29726. 1
  29727. 1
  29728. 1
  29729. 1
  29730. 1
  29731. 1
  29732. 1
  29733. 1
  29734. 1
  29735. 1
  29736. 1
  29737. 1
  29738. 1
  29739. 1
  29740. 1
  29741. 1
  29742. 1
  29743. 1
  29744. 1
  29745. 1
  29746. 1
  29747. 1
  29748. 1
  29749. 1
  29750. 1
  29751. 1
  29752. 1
  29753. 1
  29754. 1
  29755. 1
  29756. 1
  29757. 1
  29758. 1
  29759. 1
  29760. 1
  29761. 1
  29762. 1
  29763. 1
  29764. 1
  29765. 1
  29766. 1
  29767. 1
  29768. 1
  29769. 1
  29770. 1
  29771. 1
  29772. 1
  29773. 1
  29774. 1
  29775. 1
  29776. 1
  29777. 1
  29778. 1
  29779. 1
  29780. 1
  29781. 1
  29782. 1
  29783. 1
  29784. 1
  29785. 1
  29786. 1
  29787. 1
  29788. 1
  29789. 1
  29790. 1
  29791. 1
  29792. 1
  29793. 1
  29794. 1
  29795. 1
  29796. 1
  29797. 1
  29798. 1
  29799. 1
  29800. 1
  29801. 1
  29802. 1
  29803. 1
  29804. 1
  29805. 1
  29806. 1
  29807. 1
  29808. 1
  29809. 1
  29810. 1
  29811. 1
  29812. 1
  29813. 1
  29814. 1
  29815. 1
  29816. 1
  29817. 1
  29818. 1
  29819. 1
  29820. 1
  29821. 1
  29822. 1
  29823. 1
  29824. 1
  29825. 1
  29826. 1
  29827. 1
  29828. 1
  29829. 1
  29830. 1
  29831. 1
  29832. 1
  29833. 1
  29834. 1
  29835. 1
  29836. 1
  29837. 1
  29838. 1
  29839. 1
  29840. From April 11 to 12, the eighth China-Vietnam border defense friendly exchange event was held in Hekou, Yunnan, Lao Cai, Vietnam, and related port areas. Defense Minister Dong Jun and Vietnamese Defense Minister Phan Van Giang led delegations to attend and hold talks respectively. Dong Jun said that holding this border defense friendly exchange event is a concrete measure to implement the important consensus reached by the top leaders of the two parties. China is willing to inherit the profound friendship of "comrades and brothers" with Vietnam, firmly support each other's core interests and major concerns, and bring the strategic mutual trust between the two militaries to a new height. The two sides should actively expand practical cooperation in personnel training, delegation exchanges, political work and other fields, give more new connotations to defense friendly exchange activities, make maritime cooperation a new highlight of cooperation between the two militaries, enhance the ability to jointly maintain maritime security, and build a Contribution to the China-Vietnam community of shared future with strategic significance. Phan Van Giang said that he was grateful to China for its help in Vietnam's national liberation struggle and national construction. Vietnam has always regarded the development of Vietnam-China relations as a diplomatic priority and is willing to work with China to promote bilateral defense relations to a new level under the guidance of the "Six Updates" new heights. The two sides signed a memorandum of understanding on setting up a hotline between the Southern Theater Command and the Vietnamese Navy, and carried out activities such as painting red boundary markers, planting friendship trees, observing joint land patrols by the border defense forces of the two countries, and visiting local primary schools.
    1
  29841. From April 11 to 12, the eighth China-Vietnam border defense friendly exchange event was held in Hekou, Yunnan, Lao Cai, Vietnam, and related port areas. Defense Minister Dong Jun and Vietnamese Defense Minister Phan Van Giang led delegations to attend and hold talks respectively. Dong Jun said that holding this border defense friendly exchange event is a concrete measure to implement the important consensus reached by the top leaders of the two parties. China is willing to inherit the profound friendship of "comrades and brothers" with Vietnam, firmly support each other's core interests and major concerns, and bring the strategic mutual trust between the two militaries to a new height. The two sides should actively expand practical cooperation in personnel training, delegation exchanges, political work and other fields, give more new connotations to defense friendly exchange activities, make maritime cooperation a new highlight of cooperation between the two militaries, enhance the ability to jointly maintain maritime security, and build a Contribution to the China-Vietnam community of shared future with strategic significance. Phan Van Giang said that he was grateful to China for its help in Vietnam's national liberation struggle and national construction. Vietnam has always regarded the development of Vietnam-China relations as a diplomatic priority and is willing to work with China to promote bilateral defense relations to a new level under the guidance of the "Six Updates" new heights.
    1
  29842. 1
  29843. 1
  29844. 1
  29845. 1
  29846. 1
  29847. 1
  29848. 1
  29849. 1
  29850. 1
  29851. 1
  29852. 1
  29853. 1
  29854. 1
  29855. 1
  29856. 1
  29857. 1
  29858. 1
  29859. 1
  29860. 1
  29861. 1
  29862. 1
  29863. 1
  29864. 1
  29865. 1
  29866. 1
  29867. 1
  29868. 1
  29869. 1
  29870. 1
  29871. 1
  29872. 1
  29873. 1
  29874. 1
  29875. 1
  29876. 1
  29877. 1
  29878. 1
  29879. 1
  29880. 1
  29881. 1
  29882. 1
  29883. 1
  29884. 1
  29885. 1
  29886. 1
  29887. 1
  29888. 1
  29889. 1
  29890. 1
  29891. 1
  29892. 1
  29893. 1
  29894. 1
  29895. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29896. 1
  29897. 1
  29898. 1
  29899. 🤣You are late by 30years to report... 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29900. 1
  29901. 1
  29902. 1
  29903. 1
  29904. 1
  29905. 1
  29906. 1
  29907. 1
  29908. 1
  29909. 1
  29910. 1
  29911. 1
  29912. 1
  29913. 1
  29914. 1
  29915. 1
  29916. 1
  29917. 1
  29918. 1
  29919. 1
  29920. 1
  29921. 1
  29922. 1
  29923. 1
  29924. 1
  29925. 1
  29926. 1
  29927. 1
  29928. 1
  29929. 1
  29930. 1
  29931. 1
  29932. 1
  29933. 1
  29934. 1
  29935. 1
  29936. 1
  29937. 1
  29938. 1
  29939. 1
  29940. 1
  29941. 1
  29942. 1
  29943. 1
  29944. 1
  29945. 1
  29946. 1
  29947. 1
  29948. 1
  29949. 1
  29950. 1
  29951. 1
  29952. 1
  29953.  @2b_or_not_2b_4gotten  1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  29954. 1
  29955. 1
  29956. 1
  29957. 1
  29958. 1
  29959. 1
  29960. 1
  29961. 1
  29962. 1
  29963. 1
  29964. 1
  29965. 1
  29966. 1
  29967. 1
  29968. 1
  29969. 1
  29970. 1
  29971. 1
  29972. 1
  29973. 1
  29974. 1
  29975. 1
  29976. 1
  29977. 1
  29978. 1
  29979. 1
  29980. 1
  29981. 1
  29982. 1
  29983. 1
  29984. 1
  29985. 1
  29986. 1
  29987. 1
  29988. 1
  29989. 1
  29990. 1
  29991. 1
  29992. 1
  29993. 1
  29994. 1
  29995. 1
  29996. 1
  29997. 1
  29998. 1
  29999. 1
  30000. 1
  30001. 1
  30002. 1
  30003. 1
  30004. 1
  30005. 1
  30006. 1
  30007. 1
  30008. 1
  30009. 1
  30010. gordon chang prediction book The Coming Collapse Of China has not aged well after being published in 2001, twenty one years ago. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30011. 1
  30012. 1
  30013. 1
  30014. 1
  30015. 1
  30016. 1
  30017. 1
  30018. 1
  30019. 1
  30020. 1
  30021.  @pandabearoceanpark  1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30022. 1
  30023. 1
  30024. 1
  30025. 1
  30026. 1
  30027. 1
  30028. 1
  30029. 1
  30030. 1
  30031. 1
  30032. 1
  30033. 1
  30034. 1
  30035. 1
  30036. 1
  30037. 1
  30038. 1
  30039. 1
  30040. 1
  30041. 1
  30042. 1
  30043. 1
  30044. 1
  30045. 1
  30046. 1
  30047. 1
  30048. 1
  30049. 1
  30050. 1
  30051. 1
  30052. 1
  30053. 1
  30054. 1
  30055. 1
  30056. 1
  30057. 1
  30058. 1
  30059. 1
  30060. 1
  30061. 1
  30062. 1
  30063. 1
  30064. 1
  30065. 1
  30066. 1
  30067. 1
  30068. 1
  30069. 1
  30070. 1
  30071. 1
  30072. 1
  30073. Why, then, does the United States use economic sanctions so often? The popularity of sanctions owes more to the domestic interests of politicians than their ability to achieve geopolitical goals. American policymakers show little interest in the empirical research on sanctions and they often do not supplement trade restrictions with diplomatic efforts that can help achieve a bargain. In contrast, sanctions make sense from the perspective of domestic politics and political psychology. They provide a middle ground between military force and doing nothing and are unlikely to cause a domestic backlash because the damage they inflict is indirect and largely unobserved. Taking into account political realities, here are several suggestions to prevent the overuse of sanctions: when implemented, they should be restricted to symbolic targets, which would allow American leaders to achieve their political goals without harming innocents abroad; the United States should be laxer in the enforcement of current and future sanctions regimes; and Congress should legislate to make it more difficult for the executive branch to unilaterally impose sanctions without end, which would create a legal cause of action for those affected. Finally, opponents of current policies should continue to make the public aware of the effects of robust sanctions, which can remove the political incentive to enact and implement them. The more often that imposing heavy economic sanctions is seen as an ineffective policy that harms innocents abroad for self‐​interested reasons, the less likely they are to be used.
    1
  30074. 1
  30075. 1
  30076. 1
  30077. 1
  30078. 1
  30079. 1
  30080. 1
  30081. 1
  30082. 1
  30083. 1
  30084. 1
  30085. 1
  30086. 1
  30087. 1
  30088. 1
  30089. 1
  30090. 1
  30091. 1
  30092. 1
  30093. 1
  30094. 1
  30095. 1
  30096. 1
  30097. 1
  30098. 1
  30099. 1
  30100. 1
  30101. 1
  30102. 1
  30103. 1
  30104. 1
  30105. 1
  30106. 1
  30107. 1
  30108. 1
  30109. 1
  30110. 1
  30111. 1
  30112. 1
  30113. 1
  30114. 1
  30115. 1
  30116. 1
  30117. 1
  30118. 1
  30119. 1
  30120. 1
  30121. 1
  30122. 1
  30123. 1
  30124. 1
  30125. 1
  30126. 1
  30127. 1
  30128. 1
  30129. 1
  30130. 1
  30131. 1
  30132. 1
  30133. 1
  30134. 1
  30135. 1
  30136. 1
  30137. 1
  30138. 1
  30139. 1
  30140. 1
  30141. 1
  30142. 1
  30143. 1
  30144. 1
  30145. 1
  30146. 1
  30147. 1
  30148. 1
  30149. 1
  30150. 1
  30151. 1
  30152. 1
  30153. 1
  30154. 1
  30155. 1
  30156. 1
  30157. 1
  30158. 1
  30159. 1
  30160. 1
  30161. 1
  30162. 1
  30163. 1
  30164. 1
  30165. 1
  30166. 1
  30167. 1
  30168. 1
  30169. 1
  30170. 1
  30171. 1
  30172. 1
  30173. 1
  30174. 1
  30175. 1
  30176. 1
  30177. 1
  30178. 1
  30179. 1
  30180. 1
  30181. 1
  30182. 1
  30183. 1
  30184. 1
  30185. 1
  30186. 1
  30187. 1
  30188. 1
  30189. 1
  30190. 1
  30191. 1
  30192. 1
  30193. 1
  30194. 1
  30195. 1
  30196. 1
  30197. 1
  30198. 1
  30199. 1
  30200. 1
  30201. 1
  30202. 1
  30203. 1
  30204. 1
  30205. 1
  30206. 1
  30207. 1
  30208. 1
  30209. 1
  30210. 1
  30211. 1
  30212. 1
  30213. 1
  30214. 1
  30215. 1
  30216. 1
  30217. 1
  30218. 1
  30219. 1
  30220. 1
  30221. 1
  30222. 1
  30223. 1
  30224. 1
  30225. 1
  30226. 1
  30227. 1
  30228. 1
  30229. 1
  30230. 1
  30231. 1
  30232. 1
  30233. 1
  30234. 1
  30235. 1
  30236. 1
  30237. 1
  30238. 1
  30239. 1
  30240. 1
  30241. 1
  30242. 1
  30243. 1
  30244. 1
  30245. 1
  30246. 1
  30247. 1
  30248. 1
  30249. 1
  30250. 1
  30251. 1
  30252. 1
  30253. 1
  30254. 1
  30255. 1
  30256. 1
  30257. 1
  30258. 1
  30259. 1
  30260. 1
  30261. 1
  30262. 1
  30263. 1
  30264. 1
  30265. 1
  30266. 1
  30267. 1
  30268. 1
  30269. 1
  30270. 1
  30271. 1
  30272. 1
  30273. 1
  30274. 1
  30275. 1
  30276. 1
  30277. 1
  30278. 1
  30279. 1
  30280. 1
  30281. 1
  30282. 1
  30283. 1
  30284. 1
  30285. 1
  30286. 1
  30287. 1
  30288. 1
  30289. 1
  30290. 1
  30291. 1
  30292. 1
  30293. 1
  30294. 1
  30295. 1
  30296. 1
  30297. 1
  30298. 1
  30299. 1
  30300. 1
  30301. 1
  30302. 1
  30303. 1
  30304. 1
  30305. 1
  30306. 1
  30307. 1
  30308. 1
  30309. 1
  30310. 1
  30311. 1
  30312. 1
  30313. 1
  30314. 1
  30315. 1
  30316. 1
  30317. 1
  30318. 1
  30319. 1
  30320. 1
  30321. 1
  30322. 1
  30323. 1
  30324. 1
  30325. 1
  30326. 1
  30327. 1
  30328. 1
  30329. 1
  30330. 1
  30331. 1
  30332. 1
  30333. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30334. 1
  30335. 1
  30336. 1
  30337. 1
  30338. 1
  30339. 1
  30340. 1
  30341. 1
  30342. 1
  30343. 1
  30344. 1
  30345. 1
  30346. 1
  30347. 1
  30348. 1
  30349. 1
  30350. 1
  30351. 1
  30352. UN : Companies in India are supplying weapons to Myanmar’s junta while Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses concern about the political crisis in Myanmar on the international stage, observers said Monday, highlighting the two-faced nature of the strategy. Indian arms manufacturer Bharat Electronics Limited, or BEL, transferred military equipment worth more than US$5.1 million to Myanmar’s army or known Myanmar arms brokers Alliance Engineering Consultancy and Mega Hill General Trading over a period of six months from November 2022 to April 2023, the rights group Justice for Myanmar reported in June. The military equipment included metallic sonar domes; transducers and gaskets for the domes to be used on frigates, warships or submarines; directing gear systems; technical documents; various items for radio transmission or radar equipment; and manpack radios for battlefield communication. Justice for Myanmar called the shipments “part of a pattern of Indian support for the Myanmar military and its domestic arms industry” and called on India’s allies to use their leverage to “pressure India to stop the supply of arms and dual use goods and technology” to the regime, including during Modi’s state visits to the U.S. and France this year. The weapons sales come even as Modi and U.S. President Joe Biden issued a joint statement following their meeting at the White House on June 22 expressing concern about the worsening rights situation in Myanmar and calling for the release of the country’s political prisoners.
    1
  30353. 1
  30354. 1
  30355. 1
  30356. 1
  30357. 1
  30358. 1
  30359. 1
  30360. 1
  30361. 1
  30362. 1
  30363. 1
  30364. 1
  30365. 1
  30366. 1
  30367. 1
  30368. 1
  30369. 1
  30370. 1
  30371. 1
  30372. 1
  30373. 1
  30374. 1
  30375. 1
  30376. 1
  30377. 1
  30378. 1
  30379. 1
  30380. 1
  30381. 1
  30382. 1
  30383. 1
  30384. 1
  30385. 1
  30386. 1
  30387. 1
  30388. 1
  30389. 1
  30390. 1
  30391. 1
  30392. 1
  30393. 1
  30394. 1
  30395. 1
  30396. 1
  30397. Why, then, does the United States use economic sanctions so often? The popularity of sanctions owes more to the domestic interests of politicians than their ability to achieve geopolitical goals. American policymakers show little interest in the empirical research on sanctions and they often do not supplement trade restrictions with diplomatic efforts that can help achieve a bargain. In contrast, sanctions make sense from the perspective of domestic politics and political psychology. They provide a middle ground between military force and doing nothing and are unlikely to cause a domestic backlash because the damage they inflict is indirect and largely unobserved. Taking into account political realities, here are several suggestions to prevent the overuse of sanctions: when implemented, they should be restricted to symbolic targets, which would allow American leaders to achieve their political goals without harming innocents abroad; the United States should be laxer in the enforcement of current and future sanctions regimes; and Congress should legislate to make it more difficult for the executive branch to unilaterally impose sanctions without end, which would create a legal cause of action for those affected. Finally, opponents of current policies should continue to make the public aware of the effects of robust sanctions, which can remove the political incentive to enact and implement them. The more often that imposing heavy economic sanctions is seen as an ineffective policy that harms innocents abroad for self‐​interested reasons, the less likely they are to be used.
    1
  30398. 1
  30399. 1
  30400. 1
  30401. 1
  30402. 1
  30403. 1
  30404. 1
  30405. 1
  30406. 1
  30407. 1
  30408. 1
  30409. 1
  30410. 1
  30411. 1
  30412. 1
  30413. 1
  30414. 1
  30415. 1
  30416. 1
  30417. 1
  30418. 1
  30419. 1
  30420. 1
  30421. 1
  30422. 1
  30423. 1
  30424. 1
  30425. 1
  30426. 1
  30427. 1
  30428. 1
  30429. 1
  30430. 1
  30431. 1
  30432. 1
  30433. 1
  30434. 1
  30435. 1
  30436. 1
  30437. 1
  30438. 1
  30439. 1
  30440. 1
  30441. 1
  30442. 1
  30443. 1
  30444. 1
  30445. 1
  30446. 1
  30447. 1
  30448. 1
  30449. 1
  30450. 1
  30451. 1
  30452. 1
  30453. 1
  30454. 1
  30455. 1
  30456. 1
  30457. 1
  30458. 1
  30459. 1
  30460. 1
  30461. 1
  30462. 1
  30463. 1
  30464. 1
  30465. 1
  30466. 1
  30467. 1
  30468. 1
  30469. 1
  30470. 1
  30471. 1
  30472. 1
  30473. 1
  30474. 1
  30475. 1
  30476. 1
  30477. 1
  30478. 1
  30479. 1
  30480. 1
  30481. 1
  30482. 1
  30483. 1
  30484. 1
  30485. 1
  30486. 1
  30487. 1
  30488. 1
  30489. 1
  30490. 1
  30491. 1
  30492. 1
  30493. 1
  30494. 1
  30495. 1
  30496. 1
  30497. 1
  30498. 1
  30499. 1
  30500. 1
  30501. 1
  30502. 1
  30503. 1
  30504. 1
  30505. 1
  30506. 1
  30507. 1
  30508. 1
  30509. 1
  30510. 1
  30511. 1
  30512. 1
  30513. 1
  30514. 1
  30515. 1
  30516. 1
  30517. 1
  30518. 1
  30519. 1
  30520. 1
  30521. 1
  30522. 1
  30523. 1
  30524. 1
  30525. 1
  30526. 1
  30527. 1
  30528. 1
  30529. 1
  30530. 1
  30531. 1
  30532. 1
  30533. 1
  30534. 1
  30535. 1
  30536. 1
  30537. 1
  30538. 1
  30539. 1
  30540. 1
  30541. 1
  30542. 1
  30543. 1
  30544. 1
  30545. 1
  30546. 1
  30547. 1
  30548. 1
  30549. 1
  30550. 1
  30551. 1
  30552. 1
  30553. 1
  30554. 1
  30555. 1
  30556. 1
  30557. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30558. 1
  30559. 1
  30560. 1
  30561. 1
  30562. 1
  30563. 1
  30564. 1
  30565. 1
  30566. 1
  30567. 1
  30568. 1
  30569. 1
  30570. 1
  30571. 1
  30572. 1
  30573. 1
  30574. 1
  30575. 1
  30576. 1
  30577. 1
  30578. 1
  30579. 1
  30580. 1
  30581. 1
  30582. 1
  30583. 1
  30584. 1
  30585. 1
  30586. 1
  30587. 1
  30588. 1
  30589. 1
  30590. 1
  30591. 1
  30592. 1
  30593. 1
  30594. 1
  30595. 1
  30596. 1
  30597. 1
  30598. 1
  30599. 1
  30600. 1
  30601. 1
  30602. 1
  30603. 1
  30604. 1
  30605. 1
  30606. 1
  30607. 1
  30608. 1
  30609. 1
  30610. 1
  30611. 1
  30612. 1
  30613. 1
  30614. 1
  30615. 1
  30616. 1
  30617. 1
  30618. 1
  30619. 1
  30620. 1
  30621. 1
  30622. 1
  30623. 1
  30624. 1
  30625. 1
  30626. 1
  30627. 1
  30628. 1
  30629. 1
  30630. 1
  30631. 1
  30632. 1
  30633. 1
  30634. 1
  30635. 1
  30636. 1
  30637. 1
  30638. 1
  30639. 1
  30640. 1
  30641. 1
  30642. 1
  30643. 1
  30644. 1
  30645. 1
  30646. 1
  30647. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  30648. 1
  30649. 1
  30650. 1
  30651. 1
  30652. 1
  30653. 1
  30654. 1
  30655. 1
  30656.  @skipperson4077  😅😅😅 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30657. 1
  30658. 1
  30659. 1
  30660. 1
  30661. 1
  30662. 1
  30663. 1
  30664. 1
  30665. 1
  30666. 1
  30667. 1
  30668. 1
  30669. 1
  30670. 1
  30671. 1
  30672. 1
  30673. 1
  30674. 1
  30675. 1
  30676. 1
  30677. 1
  30678. 1
  30679. 1
  30680. 1
  30681. 1
  30682. 1
  30683. 1
  30684. 1
  30685. 1
  30686. 1
  30687. 1
  30688. 1
  30689. 1
  30690. 1
  30691. 1
  30692. 1
  30693. 1
  30694. 1
  30695. 1
  30696. 1
  30697. 1
  30698. 1
  30699. 1
  30700. 1
  30701. 1
  30702. 1
  30703. 1
  30704. 1
  30705. 1
  30706. 1
  30707. 1
  30708. 1
  30709. 1
  30710. 1
  30711. 1
  30712. 1
  30713. 1
  30714. 1
  30715. 1
  30716. 1
  30717. 1
  30718. 1
  30719. 1
  30720. 1
  30721. 1
  30722. 1
  30723. 1
  30724. 1
  30725. 1
  30726. 1
  30727. 1
  30728. 1
  30729. 1
  30730. 1
  30731. 1
  30732. 1
  30733. 1
  30734. 1
  30735. 1
  30736. 1
  30737. 1
  30738. 1
  30739. 1
  30740. 1
  30741. 1
  30742. 1
  30743. 1
  30744. 1
  30745. 1
  30746. 1
  30747. 1
  30748. 1
  30749. 1
  30750. 1
  30751. 1
  30752. 1
  30753. 1
  30754. 1
  30755. 1
  30756. 1
  30757. 1
  30758. 1
  30759. 1
  30760. 1
  30761. 1
  30762. 1
  30763. 1
  30764. 1
  30765. 1
  30766. 1
  30767. 1
  30768. 1
  30769. 1
  30770. 1
  30771. 1
  30772. 1
  30773. 1
  30774. 1
  30775. 1
  30776. 1
  30777. 1
  30778. 1
  30779. 1
  30780. 1
  30781. 1
  30782. 1
  30783. 1
  30784. 1
  30785. 1
  30786. 1
  30787. 1
  30788. 1
  30789. 1
  30790. 1
  30791. 1
  30792. 1
  30793. 1
  30794. 1
  30795. 1
  30796. 1
  30797. 1
  30798. 1
  30799. 1
  30800. 1
  30801. 1
  30802. 1
  30803. 1
  30804. 1
  30805. @Ezioauditore9300 All because of a lie. As an Iraqi watching the footage of that wretched night it takes me back to that feeling of absolute horror and uncertainty as the sky turned red all of a sudden and missiles started flying through the sky from opposite directions, how my mother pulled me and my younger brother inside as we were watching from our small apartment's balcony and ran inside to put some useless surgical masks she had aqquired as she worked as a nurse on our little faces because rumors spread that the Americans will start bombarding us with chemical weapons. I still remember hardly falling asleep in my mother's lap alongside my brother clutching to whatever little fake bravness my mother is trying to hold for us not to panic and to go to sleep. In the mean time my father fidgeting between the roof and to the street, talking to the neighbors trying to make sense of what's happening as we all were taken by surprise, and finally sitting alone in the living room defeated as he was certian that his family's safety was no longer in his handa and there is absolutely nothing to be done against the goliath that is American army at our doorsteps. Growing up, I can almost feel what my parents went through at dark times like those, and the travisities didn't stop at that. the destruction of the Iraqi infrastructure didn't stop at only bombing importanct facilities like power plants, hospitals, shelters, oil plants, main roads, no the Americans knew just how to put us a 100 years behind compared other countries, an organized hunt mission on the country's best minds was initiated by the us proxies; doctors, engineers, scientists, teachers, and much more. a year of civil war followed, also induced by american influence that took the lives of so many poor innocent men. I feel I wrote so much yet I told so little, I can write a book about what we had to endure just so chaney can get richer and so that Bush would get a round of applause at the congress. But after all who would listen, these facts are all presented and have been known ever since 2005 and yet no one was brought to court, I guess this is how the world works, where justice can only be seen in comic books and movies which are also american made. And all of that happened because of that damned lie.
    1
  30806. 1
  30807. 1
  30808. 1
  30809. 1
  30810. 1
  30811. 1
  30812. 1
  30813. 1
  30814. 1
  30815. 1
  30816. 1
  30817. 1
  30818. 1
  30819. 1
  30820. 1
  30821. 1
  30822. 1
  30823. 1
  30824. 1
  30825. 1
  30826. 1
  30827. 1
  30828. 1
  30829. 1
  30830. 1
  30831. 1
  30832. 1
  30833. 1
  30834. 1
  30835. 1
  30836. 1
  30837. 1
  30838. 1
  30839. 1
  30840. 1
  30841. 1
  30842. 1
  30843. 1
  30844. 1
  30845. 1
  30846. 1
  30847. 1
  30848. 1
  30849. 1
  30850. 1
  30851. 1
  30852. 1
  30853. 1
  30854. 1
  30855. 1
  30856. 1
  30857. 1
  30858. 1
  30859. 1
  30860. 1
  30861. 1
  30862. 1
  30863. 1
  30864. 1
  30865. 1
  30866. 1
  30867. 1
  30868. 1
  30869. 1
  30870. 1
  30871. 1
  30872. 1
  30873. 1
  30874. 1
  30875. 1
  30876. 1
  30877. 1
  30878. 1
  30879. 1
  30880. 1
  30881. 1
  30882. 1
  30883. 1
  30884. 1
  30885. 1
  30886. 1
  30887. 1
  30888. 1
  30889. 1
  30890. 1
  30891. 1
  30892. 1
  30893. 1
  30894. 1
  30895. 1
  30896. 1
  30897. 1
  30898. 1
  30899. 1
  30900. 1
  30901. 1
  30902. 1
  30903. 1
  30904. 1
  30905. 1
  30906. 1
  30907. 1
  30908. 1
  30909. 1
  30910. 1
  30911. 1
  30912. 1
  30913. 1
  30914. 1
  30915. 1
  30916. 1
  30917. 1
  30918. 1
  30919. 1
  30920. 1
  30921. 1
  30922. 1
  30923. 1
  30924. 1
  30925. 1
  30926. 1
  30927. 1
  30928. 1
  30929. 1
  30930. 1
  30931. 1
  30932. 1
  30933. 1
  30934. 1
  30935. 1
  30936. 1
  30937. 1
  30938. 1
  30939. 1
  30940. 1
  30941. 1
  30942. 1
  30943. 1
  30944. 1
  30945. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  30946. 1
  30947. 1
  30948. 1
  30949. 1
  30950. 1
  30951. 1
  30952. 1
  30953. 1
  30954. 1
  30955. Talk is useless , show me the money. 13-5-2023 Kamala Harris Got Called Out For Asking African Countries To Cut Ties With China As we all know the U$ and the Chinese are fighting for Africa's affection and to be the best man for Africa because we all know they want our resources they want our land all that is not new. But nowadays it's getting too much because a U.S official will come to Africa and tell us how much better they are compared to the Chinese and then the Chinese Diplomat will come and tell us how much they can offer us and what they're willing to do for us and how they're not like the U$. They won't boss us around and they won't push their policies on us we've seen it all go down in recent years. The director of pan-africanism today Akende Membe said this if you look at the Western and the imperialist countries they come with their own interests. The vice president of the U$ came to Zambia landed at a chinese-built airport in Zambia moved on a chinese-built road in Zambia. It's it's ironic that Kamala Harris will travel to Zambia and tell zambians stop trusting the Chinese and having a relationship with them when everything that she has used in Zambia the Chinese basically helped build. In Zambia very few people know that this hospital was a gift. Zambia did not pay one dollar for that hospital if you went and saw all the little placard that says gift from the Chinese people it's the size of an A4 sheet of paper and this is a massive hospital that deals with over 2 600 referral cases a month. But China is so humble in the way they deal with us on the African continent. If this was an American gift it would be reported in Media from the U.$ to Latin America to Europe to Australia the whole world would know about this gift to the African continent.
    1
  30956. 1
  30957. 1
  30958. 1
  30959. 1
  30960. 1
  30961. Thirty+ years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to SOVIET . The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    1
  30962. 1
  30963. 1
  30964. 1
  30965. 1
  30966. 1
  30967. 1
  30968. 1
  30969. 1
  30970. 1
  30971. 1
  30972. 1
  30973. 1
  30974. 1
  30975. 1
  30976. 1
  30977. 1
  30978. 1
  30979. 1
  30980. 1
  30981. 1
  30982. 1
  30983. 1
  30984. 1
  30985. 1
  30986. 1
  30987. 1
  30988. 1
  30989. 1
  30990. 1
  30991. 1
  30992. 1
  30993. 1
  30994. 1
  30995. 1
  30996. 1
  30997. 1
  30998. 1
  30999. 1
  31000. 1
  31001. 1
  31002. 1
  31003. 1
  31004. 1
  31005. 1
  31006. 1
  31007. 1
  31008. 1
  31009. 1
  31010. 1
  31011. 1
  31012. 1
  31013. 1
  31014. 1
  31015. 1
  31016. 1
  31017. 1
  31018. 1
  31019. 1
  31020. 1
  31021. 1
  31022. 1
  31023. 1
  31024. 1
  31025. BY @jackychick I am a Hong konger, and it is absolutely ridiculous that the so-called resistance from activists were ALL supporting Hong Kong INDEPENDENCE. Only people who are nuts would think that is possible, yet almost all rioters as well as many protestors were demanding self determination like a referendum for independence. Almost all politicians from the so-called democratic party( in name only) broke the election laws on purpose and many were jailed subsequently despite repeated warnings from the government. Most of the activists who organised the protests were also trying to be famous in local media as they would be interviewed by many journalists and literally everyone of them tried to run for local elections ! Protests were simply tools for them to get media exposure. Western media in 2019 wanted to dump it down to communist sympathiers vs democracy protestors (blue and yellow ribbon in hong kong) when in fact the silent majority were both afraid of the communist AND they were even more afraid of fascist freedom fighters ( i.e the rioters) who hospitalised anyone that dared to exercise free speech and opposed their vandalism and violent protests. Doxxing was rampant as children and relatives of the police, or anyone who dared to oppose violent protests were threatened and their homes attacked. Many fled Hong Kong because they were arrested during the riots to escape potential prosecutions. what s the prosecution rate? out of 12000+ rioters, less than 1000 were sent to jail despite being caught red handed at the riots. Most were not even charged as you need beyond reasonable doubt in hong kong to prosecute a rioter. By wearing masks, most of them could not be identified even if they were arrested with rioting gears like helmets, huge umbrella on sunny day, protective gears etc. Out of every riot, e.g 300+ rioters, only 20+ would be arrested in the early months. i.e less than 10%. So out of 12000 people, with <10% arrested, many estimated over 100,000+ participated in riots, many were teenagers still studying at schools. So you have a situation in Hong kong where >99.3% of rioters got away with rioting as less than 1000 were jailed. This sad affair ultimately prompted Beijing to establish the national security law. So hong kongers could no longer legally commit treason, like flying to the Congress and demanding America to sanction hong kong and China if hong kong couldn't have a western style democracy. How many protestors were killed by the hong kong police during 5 months of protests and riots? ZERO. Did rioters kill anyone? One unarmed cleaner was murdered by a rioter in broad daylight as they got accustomed to throwing bricks at the police and they threw bricks at unarmed innocents for opposing violent protests. Another was set on fire and required multiple surgeries to survive. A total of at least 70+ unarmed innocents were severely hospitalised by rioters, a dozen required surgeries as the fascist mobs beat them to a pulp. Only a few were reported like they were isolated incidents when in fact the rioters brutality against unarmed innocents were happening EVERY SINGLE WEEK for FIVE months, terrorising millions of hong kongers. Solution? Many pretend to support them. e.g they stopped all the cars at motorways and demand drivers to donate money to their cause, so many simply shouted their protests slogans and they were immediately let go!
    1
  31026. 1
  31027. 1
  31028. 1
  31029. 1
  31030. 1
  31031. 1
  31032. 1
  31033. 1
  31034. 1
  31035. 1
  31036. 1
  31037. 1
  31038. 1
  31039. 1
  31040. 1
  31041. 1
  31042. 1
  31043. 1
  31044. 1
  31045. 1
  31046. 1
  31047. 1
  31048. 1
  31049. 1
  31050. 1
  31051. 1
  31052. 1
  31053. 1
  31054. 1
  31055. 1
  31056. 1
  31057. 1
  31058. 1
  31059. 1
  31060. 1
  31061. 1
  31062. 1
  31063. 1
  31064. 1
  31065. 1
  31066. 1
  31067. 1
  31068. 1
  31069. 1
  31070. 1
  31071. 1
  31072. 1
  31073. 1
  31074. 1
  31075. 1
  31076. 1
  31077. 1
  31078. 1
  31079. 1
  31080. 1
  31081. 1
  31082. 1
  31083. 1
  31084. 1
  31085. 1
  31086. 1
  31087. 1
  31088. 1
  31089. 1
  31090. 1
  31091. 1
  31092. 1
  31093. 1
  31094. 1
  31095. 1
  31096. 1
  31097. 1
  31098. 1
  31099. 1
  31100. 1
  31101. 1
  31102. 1
  31103. 1
  31104. 1
  31105. 1
  31106. 1
  31107. 1
  31108. 1
  31109. 1
  31110. 1
  31111. 1
  31112. 1
  31113. 1
  31114. 1
  31115. 1
  31116. 1
  31117. 1
  31118. 1
  31119. 1
  31120. 1
  31121. 1
  31122. 1
  31123. 1
  31124. 1
  31125. 1
  31126. 1
  31127. 1
  31128. 1
  31129. 1
  31130. 1
  31131. 1
  31132. 1
  31133. 1
  31134. 1
  31135. 1
  31136. 1
  31137. 1
  31138. 1
  31139. 1
  31140. 1
  31141. 1
  31142. 1
  31143. 1
  31144. 1
  31145. 1
  31146. 1
  31147. 1
  31148. 1
  31149. 1
  31150. 1
  31151. 1
  31152. 1
  31153. 1
  31154. 1
  31155. 1
  31156. 1
  31157. 1
  31158. 1
  31159. 1
  31160. 1
  31161. 1
  31162. 1
  31163. 1
  31164. 1
  31165. 1
  31166. 1
  31167. 1
  31168. 1
  31169. 1
  31170. 1
  31171. 1
  31172. 1
  31173. 1
  31174. 1
  31175. 1
  31176. 1
  31177. 1
  31178. 1
  31179. 1
  31180. 1
  31181. 1
  31182. 1
  31183. 1
  31184. 1
  31185. 1
  31186. 1
  31187. 1
  31188. 1
  31189. 1
  31190. 1
  31191. 1
  31192. 1
  31193. 1
  31194. 1
  31195. 1
  31196. 1
  31197. 1
  31198. 1
  31199. 1
  31200. 1
  31201. 1
  31202. 1
  31203. 1
  31204. 1
  31205. 1
  31206. 1
  31207. 1
  31208. 1
  31209. 1
  31210. 1
  31211. 1
  31212. 1
  31213. 1
  31214. 1
  31215. 1
  31216. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  31217. 1
  31218. 1
  31219. 1
  31220. 1
  31221. 1
  31222. 1
  31223. 1
  31224. 1
  31225. 1
  31226. 1
  31227. 1
  31228. 1
  31229. 1
  31230. 1
  31231. 1
  31232. 1
  31233. 1
  31234. 1
  31235. 1
  31236. 1
  31237. 1
  31238. 1
  31239. 1
  31240. 1
  31241. 1
  31242. 1
  31243. 1
  31244. 1
  31245. 1
  31246. 1
  31247. 1
  31248. 1
  31249. 1
  31250. 1
  31251. 1
  31252. 1
  31253. 1
  31254. 1
  31255. 1
  31256. 1
  31257. Thirty years ago, Toshiba exported precision instruments to Russia. The United States has imposed the following penalties on Toshiba Group 1: The Japanese Police Department was ordered to arrest Erhe Lin, President of Toshiba Machinery Foundry, and Hiroshima Tanamura, President of Machine Tool Business, and sentenced to 10 years'imprisonment. 2: Closing Toshiba's factory in the United States 3: A 100% tariff on Toshiba products sold to the United States 4: As an alternative punishment to the previous one, Toshiba's exports to the United States were banned for five years. 5: A huge fine of 1 trillion yen was imposed on Toshiba, equivalent to $16 billion today. In order to calm the anger of the United States, Japan has imposed severe penalties on Toshiba Group: First, Japan's semiconductor industry will unconditionally share technology with American companies. Second, Toshiba spent 100 million yen to publish a full-page apology advertisement in all major newspapers in the United States. Thirdly, Japan Semiconductor Association invested 9 million US dollars to launch various relations lobbying in the US Congress, and this lobbying has become the most costly lobbying war in history. Fourthly, the chairman and general manager of Toshiba Group resigned. Fifthly, by an administrative order issued by the Ministry of Communications, Toshiba is prohibited from exporting any products to 14 countries for a period of one year. The United States is the master of Japan, Japan can only apologize, which has led to Toshiba gradually losing its past glory. Toshiba was the hope of Japan's science and technology industry, and also the hope and pillar of Japan's manufacturing. After suffering a heavy blow from the United States, Toshiba went downhill thoroughly. The U.S. attacked Toshiba not because it sold equipment to the Soviet Union, but because it affected U.S. interests. The United States believes that the Japanese semiconductor industry represented by Toshiba Group seriously threatens the economic interests of the United States, while the Japanese high-end manufacturing plan threatens the United States and challenges the technological hegemony of the United States. Looking back more than 30 years ago, the experience of Toshiba, Japan, and looking at what the United States is doing today, there are indeed many similarities. The United States does not allow its high-end manufacturing industry to be challenged at all, nor does it allow its technological hegemony to be challenged. The United States hopes that other countries will all be American workers and will never allow other countries to become shareholders of American interests.
    1
  31258. 1
  31259. 1
  31260. 1
  31261. 1
  31262. 1
  31263. 1
  31264. 1
  31265. 1
  31266. 1
  31267. 1
  31268. 1
  31269. 1
  31270. 1
  31271. 😆2024, Western media will continue to .... 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse Than You Think 2022. Business Basics: China's Economic Crisis, GDP is Crashing, Protests Everywhere. China's financial crisis is Here.
    1
  31272. 1
  31273. 1
  31274. 1
  31275. 1
  31276. 1
  31277. 1
  31278. 1
  31279. 1
  31280. 1
  31281. 1
  31282. 1
  31283. 1
  31284. 1
  31285. 1
  31286. 1
  31287. 1
  31288. 1
  31289. 1
  31290. 1
  31291. 1
  31292. 1
  31293. 1
  31294. 1
  31295. 1
  31296. 1
  31297. 1
  31298. 1
  31299. 1
  31300. 1
  31301. 1
  31302. 1
  31303. 1
  31304. 1
  31305. 1
  31306. 1
  31307. 1
  31308. 1
  31309. 1
  31310. 1
  31311. 1
  31312. 1
  31313. 1
  31314. 1
  31315. 1
  31316. 1
  31317. 1
  31318. 1
  31319. 1
  31320. 1
  31321. 1
  31322. 1
  31323. 1
  31324. 1
  31325. 1
  31326. 1
  31327. 1
  31328. 1
  31329. 1
  31330. 1
  31331. 1
  31332. 1
  31333. 1
  31334. 1
  31335. 1
  31336. 1
  31337. 1
  31338. 1
  31339. 1
  31340. 1
  31341. 1
  31342. 1
  31343. 1
  31344. 1
  31345. 1
  31346. 1
  31347. 1
  31348. 1
  31349. 1
  31350. 1
  31351. 1
  31352. 1
  31353. 1
  31354. 1
  31355. 1
  31356. 1
  31357. 1
  31358. 1
  31359. 1
  31360. 1
  31361. 1
  31362. 1
  31363. 1
  31364. 1
  31365. 1
  31366. 1
  31367. 1
  31368. 1
  31369. 1
  31370. 1
  31371. 1
  31372. 1
  31373. 1
  31374. 1
  31375. 1
  31376. 1
  31377. 1
  31378. 1
  31379. 1
  31380. 1
  31381. 1
  31382. 1
  31383. 1
  31384. 1
  31385. 1
  31386. 1
  31387. 1
  31388. 1
  31389. 1
  31390. 1
  31391. 1
  31392. 1
  31393. 1
  31394. 1
  31395. 1
  31396. 1
  31397. 1
  31398. 1
  31399. 1
  31400. 1
  31401. 1
  31402. 1
  31403. 1
  31404. 1
  31405. 1
  31406. 1
  31407. 1
  31408. 1
  31409. 1
  31410. 1
  31411. 1
  31412. 1
  31413. 1
  31414. 1
  31415. 1
  31416. 1
  31417. 1
  31418. 1
  31419. 1
  31420. 1
  31421. 1
  31422. 1
  31423. 1
  31424. 1
  31425. 1
  31426. 1
  31427. 1
  31428. 1
  31429. 1
  31430. 1
  31431. 1
  31432. 1
  31433. 1
  31434. 1
  31435. 1
  31436. 1
  31437. 1
  31438. 1
  31439. 1
  31440. 1
  31441. 1
  31442. 1
  31443. 1
  31444. 1
  31445. 1
  31446. 1
  31447. 1
  31448. 1
  31449. 1
  31450. 1
  31451. 1
  31452. 1
  31453. 1
  31454. 1
  31455. 1
  31456. 1
  31457. 1
  31458. 1
  31459. 1
  31460. 1
  31461. 1
  31462. 1
  31463. 1
  31464. 1
  31465. 1
  31466. 1
  31467. 1
  31468. 1
  31469. 1
  31470. 1
  31471. 1
  31472. 1
  31473. 1
  31474. 1
  31475. 1
  31476. 1
  31477. 1
  31478. 1
  31479. 1
  31480. 1
  31481. 1
  31482. 1
  31483. 1
  31484. 1
  31485. 1
  31486. 1
  31487. 1
  31488. 1
  31489. 1
  31490. 1
  31491. 1
  31492. 1
  31493. 1
  31494. 1
  31495. 1
  31496. 1
  31497. 1
  31498. 1
  31499. 1
  31500. 1
  31501. 1
  31502. 1
  31503. 1
  31504. 1
  31505. 1
  31506. 1
  31507. 1
  31508. 1
  31509. 1
  31510. 1
  31511. 1
  31512. 1
  31513. 1
  31514. 1
  31515. 1
  31516. 1
  31517. 1
  31518. 1
  31519. 1
  31520. 1
  31521. 1
  31522. 1
  31523. 1
  31524. 1
  31525. 1
  31526. 1
  31527. 1
  31528. 1
  31529. 1
  31530. 1
  31531. 1
  31532. 1
  31533. 1
  31534. 1
  31535. 1
  31536. 1
  31537. 1
  31538. 1
  31539. 1
  31540. 1
  31541. 1
  31542. 1
  31543. 1
  31544. 1
  31545. 1
  31546. 1
  31547. 1
  31548. 1
  31549. 1
  31550. 1
  31551. 1
  31552. 1
  31553. 1
  31554. 1
  31555. 1
  31556. 1
  31557. 1
  31558. 1
  31559. 1
  31560. 1
  31561. 1
  31562. 1
  31563. 1
  31564. 1
  31565. 1
  31566. 1
  31567. 1
  31568. 1
  31569. 1
  31570. 1
  31571. 1
  31572. 1
  31573. 1
  31574. 1
  31575. 1
  31576. 1
  31577. 1
  31578. 1
  31579. 1
  31580. 1
  31581. 1
  31582. 1
  31583. 1
  31584. 1
  31585. 1
  31586. 1
  31587. 1
  31588. 1
  31589. 1
  31590. 1
  31591. 1
  31592. 1
  31593. 1
  31594. 1
  31595. 1
  31596. 1
  31597. 1
  31598. 1
  31599. 1
  31600. 1
  31601. 1
  31602. 1
  31603. 1
  31604. 1
  31605. 1
  31606. 1
  31607. 1
  31608. 1
  31609. 1
  31610. 1
  31611. 1
  31612. 1
  31613. 1
  31614. 1
  31615. 1
  31616. 1
  31617. 1
  31618. 1
  31619. 1
  31620. 1
  31621. 1
  31622. 1
  31623. 1
  31624. 1
  31625. 1
  31626. 1
  31627. 1
  31628. 1
  31629. 1
  31630. 1
  31631. 1
  31632. 1
  31633. 1
  31634. 1
  31635. 1
  31636. 1
  31637. 1
  31638. BERLIN, Aug 1 2024 - High energy prices and a lack of reliable energy supplies are hindering German companies' production and investments, with a growing trend of industrial firms considering relocating abroad, a survey showed on Thursday. Germany's industrial firms have been suffering from a contraction in economic activity in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with the ensuing slump in Russian energy imports triggering sharp energy price rallies in 2022. Prices have since fallen but are still high compared to other countries. A poll by Germany's DIHK Chambers of Industry and Commerce of around 3,300 companies showed that 37% were considering cutting production or moving abroad, up from 31% last year and 16% in 2022. For energy-intensive industrial firms some 45% of companies were mulling slashing output or relocation, the survey showed. "The trust of the German economy in energy policy is severely damaged," Achim Dercks, DIHK deputy chief executive said, adding that the government had not succeeded in providing companies with a perspective for reliable and affordable energy supply. "Those who fail to recognise this will eventually witness the deindustrialization of our country," he said. More than a third of industrial companies in Germany are reducing investment in core processes due to high energy costs, the survey showed, adding that two-thirds of industrial firms saw their competitiveness at risk. Dercks said Berlin's package presented last month to strengthen the country as an industrial location did not go far enough, adding that solutions for energy supply and prices were left out. "For many industrial companies, however, this is currently the decisive location issue," he added. Germany's economy ministry last year proposed a subsidy for industrial electricity prices but the proposal was challenged by the finance ministry and then completely scrapped after a constitutional court ruling forced the coalition to make painful cuts to its 2024 budget.
    1
  31639. 1
  31640. 1
  31641. 1
  31642. 1
  31643. 1
  31644. 1
  31645. 1
  31646. 1
  31647. 1
  31648. 1
  31649. 1
  31650. 1
  31651. 1
  31652. 1
  31653. 1
  31654. 1
  31655. 1
  31656. 1
  31657. 1
  31658. 1
  31659. 1
  31660. 1
  31661. 1
  31662. 1
  31663. 1
  31664. 1
  31665. 1
  31666. 1
  31667. 1
  31668. 1
  31669. 1
  31670. 1
  31671. 1
  31672. 1
  31673. 1
  31674. 1
  31675. 1
  31676. 1
  31677. 1
  31678. 1
  31679. 1
  31680. 1
  31681. 1
  31682. 1
  31683. 1
  31684. 1
  31685. 1
  31686. 1
  31687. 1
  31688. 1
  31689. 1
  31690. 1
  31691. 1
  31692. 1