Comments by "Big Blue" (@bigblue6917) on "The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered" channel.

  1. 220
  2. 212
  3. 173
  4. 164
  5. 160
  6. 151
  7. 135
  8. 131
  9. 117
  10. 108
  11. 106
  12. 81
  13. 80
  14. 80
  15. 76
  16. 72
  17. 71
  18. 61
  19. 59
  20. 59
  21. 56
  22. 54
  23. 53
  24. 52
  25. 51
  26. 50
  27. 50
  28. 48
  29. 48
  30. sirrliv Thanks for your contribution here. I did know about the ships being built in France and Britain though I had forgotten about the flaws in the French warships. Not only were the Japanese ships built here in Britain but the British Royal Navy also trained the Japanese Navy here in Britain. The highlight of the visit by the Japanese was a visit to Fred Jane and taking part in his navel wargames using models and a set of rule he devised. Fred Jane was the founding editor of Jane's authoritative military reference books which are still being produced today. I live in Kingston upon Hull in Yorkshire and we have a connection with this war. When the Russian Baltic Fleet was passing through the North Sea they came across some of Hull trawlers. The Russians panicked and thinking they had come under attack by Japanese torpedo boats opened fire upon the trawlers, killing and wounding several trawlermen. Apparently, because Russia knew that Britain was supplying the Japanese Navy with its ships they thought that the Japanese had sent torpedo boats out from British ports in order to attack the Baltic Fleet. There was a huge outcry about the attack and calls for the Royal Navy to attack the Russian fleet, but it was allowed to go on its way. They probably had a good idea of the Baltic Fleets fate anyway and decided to let the Japanese deal with them. This incident makes you think about the state of mind of the Russians. They know their Pacific Fleet has been destroyed, that they now face an epic voyage to the other side of the world and they are sailing ships which they know are inferior to those of the Japanese Navy. Because of the closeness of the British and Japanese navy's the British had unparalleled access to the Japanese Navy and all of the information about how the Japanese Navy and its ships had performed. This would have helped the Royal Navy when it decided to build the Dreadnought. There is a local museum in Hull which includes photographs of the trawlers on return to Hull and also parts of the trawlers which had received damage.
    47
  31. 43
  32. 43
  33. 42
  34. 41
  35. 41
  36. 41
  37. 40
  38. 39
  39. 39
  40. 38
  41. 36
  42. 35
  43. 35
  44. 35
  45. 34
  46. It's interesting how often some of the most important roles are carried out by people who are not there to fight, such as in this example or the medic/corpsman. I remember watching an American documentary about the US Coast Guard in Viet Nam. Many dismissed the coast guards involvement because they did not understand what they were doing and thought they were just covering things like making sure dangerous stores, such as artillery shells, were handled properly when being unloaded from the ships. What the people back home did not know was that when they watched film footage of airmen being rescued by helicopters in North Viet Nam was that many of the helicopter crews were coast guards. And when you watched the films of landing craft in the Delta region working with the special forces they were also coast guard. The special forces preferred working with them. They were also tasked with stopping North Viet Nam's supplies being shipped into the Delta. More supplies were sent to the Delta then down the Ho Chi Min Trail. I did knew something about the US Coast Guards involvement in Viet Nam, such as the helicopters and the landing craft with the special forces, but much of it I did not know. Nor the extent of their involvement in the things I did know about. Ironically I did not know about their involvement in health and safety in the posts, the one thing most Americans know about the coast guards involvement in Viet Nam. Have you ever come across the British Commando unit the Combined Operations Pilotage parties. One of their roles was to survey the beaches in Normandy to make sure they could take all the vehicles coming ashore, as well as surveying the beach defences. It was because of them the landings took place when the tide was out as the landing craft would have had to deal with all the booby trapped beach obstacles. They also served on D-Day itself as they were tasked with guiding in the landing crafts. More then one of them lost their lives doing that.
    34
  47. 33
  48. 33
  49. 32
  50. 32
  51. 32
  52. 32
  53. 32
  54. 32
  55. 31
  56. 31
  57. 30
  58. 30
  59. 29
  60. 29
  61. 29
  62. 28
  63. 27
  64. 27
  65. 26
  66. 26
  67. 26
  68. 26
  69. 25
  70. 25
  71. 24
  72. 24
  73. 22
  74. 22
  75. 22
  76. 22
  77. 21
  78. 21
  79. 21
  80. 20
  81. 20
  82. 20
  83. 20
  84. 20
  85. 20
  86. 20
  87. 20
  88. 19
  89. 19
  90. 18
  91. 18
  92. 18
  93. 18
  94. 17
  95. 17
  96. 17
  97. 17
  98. 17
  99. 17
  100. 16
  101. 16
  102. 16
  103. 16
  104. 15
  105. 15
  106. 15
  107. 15
  108. 15
  109. 15
  110. 15
  111. 15
  112. 14
  113. 14
  114. 14
  115. 14
  116. 14
  117. 13
  118. 13
  119. 13
  120. 13
  121. 13
  122. 13
  123. 13
  124. 13
  125. 13
  126. 12
  127. 12
  128. 12
  129. 12
  130. 12
  131. 12
  132. 12
  133. 12
  134. 12
  135. 12
  136. 12
  137. 12
  138. 12
  139. 11
  140. 11
  141. 11
  142. 11
  143. 11
  144. 11
  145. 11
  146. 11
  147. 11
  148. 11
  149. 11
  150. 10
  151. 10
  152. 10
  153. 10
  154. 10
  155. 10
  156. 10
  157. 10
  158. 10
  159. 10
  160. 10
  161. I did know about the S.S. Ohio and I have long thought it had more then its share of luck on that trip. It is as if it had taken all the luck it would have had over its normal lifetime and had it all in one go. To give you an indication of how short of aviation fuel the RAF was, ground crews had to push the fighters to the end of the runway before the pilot could start his engine. That way the save fuel. Air attacks on Malta were so frequent that when one group of Spitfires arrived they had just enough time to refuel before they had to take off to face the next attack. Gave the German Stukas something of a shock though as they were not expecting the Spitfires, their arrival had been missed, and the RAF pilots had what was referred to as a Stuka party. That is a each Stuka dived down a Spitfire followed it. All the Stukas were shot down. And the Me 109s flying topcover never had a chance to intervene. Their problem was if they dived down to intercept the Spitfires they were flying to fast and just ended up passing the Spitfires, which would then leave the 109s open to being shot down. At various points during any war you look at decisions and wonder why those decisions were made or not made. Why the Axis forces did not take Malta has got to be one of those decisions has got to be one of those. I know other things were going on, such as the invasion of Russia, but the fact that the Germans had to send forces to North Africa anyway just shows how important taking Malta should have been.
    10
  162. 10
  163. 10
  164. 10
  165. 9
  166. 9
  167. 9
  168. 9
  169. 9
  170. 9
  171. 9
  172. 9
  173. 9
  174. 9
  175. 9
  176. 9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 8
  180. 8
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. 8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 7
  190. 7
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 7
  201. 7
  202. 7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 7
  206. 7
  207. 7
  208. 6
  209. 6
  210. 6
  211. 6
  212. 6
  213. 6
  214. 6
  215. 6
  216. 6
  217. 6
  218. 6
  219. 6
  220. 6
  221. 6
  222. 6
  223. 6
  224. 6
  225. 6
  226. 6
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. Well that's cleared up many misconceptions about this song. I had not realised how old it was nor the fact that two people were involved. From the version I had come across, with the mouse, it was the Joseph Mohr who wrote both the music and the lyrics as well as playing the guitar. And that the music and lyrics were written on Christmas Eve. And in the version of the carol I had heard about, when the Germans sang the carol in 1914 the British had known the carol but in English and some of whom had joined in. This part may have been true to some degree as many Germans had settled in Britain before the war. So it was possible that they had shared it with British friends. There is at least one story of British soldiers talking to a German speaking English with a East London cockney accent. He has been raised in London but had gone to fight for Germany at the behest of his German parents. Another song which gained popularity during WW1 was It's a Long Way to Tipperary by Jack Judge. Judge, songwriter and music-hall entertainer, was supposed to have written the song in a very short period of time, some ten or so minutes I seem to remember, as part of a five shilling bet. But others, including members of his family, have disputed this. Though is may be the five shilling bet is a myth there is always the possibility Judge actually did write it on the spare of the moment as part of a bet. There is another possibility and that is he already had the song but managed to persuade someone to bet against him. The bet was he could write a song in some ten minutes or so. He wonders off, supposedly writes the song and get his five shillings. Then sings it the following night at The Grand Theatre", Stalybridge, Cheshire, performs the song. Nice bit of PR and he enhances his reputation as a songwriter. The song itself became popular when a newspaper reporter wrote that it was being sung by the Irish regiment the Connaught Rangers while marching through France in August of 1914. It was then quickly picked up by other British regiments.
    6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 5
  239. 5
  240. 5
  241. 5
  242. 5
  243. 5
  244. 5
  245. 5
  246. 5
  247. 5
  248. 5
  249. 5
  250. 5
  251. 5
  252. 5
  253. 5
  254. 5
  255. 5
  256. 5
  257. 5
  258. 5
  259. 5
  260. 5
  261. 5
  262. 5
  263. 5
  264. 5
  265. 5
  266. 5
  267. 5
  268. 5
  269. 5
  270. They had not been doing that for four years. Tactics had been evolving all the time. By the time of the 100 Days Campaign the British 4th Army in 1918, of which one corps was American troops, they had reached the stage of what we now call combined arms, where tanks, artillery and aircraft were being used to support the infantry. The British had developed self- propelled artillery and had taken the early steps for an infantry carrier. The French had perfected using artillery in a rolling barrage giving close support of the infantry so they were following just behind the rolling barrage. When being attacked and there was a chance of a breakthrough the Germans would reinforce that area. So the British would then attack elsewhere leaving the Germans with troops in the wrong place. The British campaign at Passchendaele in 1917 came close to defeating the Germans in France. The only thing that saved them was the unseasonably wet weather which made movement nearly impossible. The thing to remember here is this was a type of warfare no one had fought before, so there was no playbook anyone could go to and say this is what they needed to do. But the British and the French had been developing effective tactics to fight the battles throughout the war. And into this comes Pershing who has no idea about all of the advances in tactics telling everyone he knew how to win the war. I should say something about the American soldiers. They were excellent. I know reading about those sent for sniper training with the British that the instructor were all very impressed by them. Given the right training they fought well. And the same can be said of their officers. And I will say that once forced into making changes Pershing did the right thing. But he was still sending in attacks right up to the last minute. Attacks which cost American soldiers lives. Attacks which were not needed.
    5
  271. 5
  272. 4
  273. 4
  274. 4
  275. 4
  276. 4
  277. 4
  278. 4
  279. 4
  280. 4
  281. 4
  282. 4
  283. 4
  284. 4
  285. 4
  286. 4
  287. 4
  288. 4
  289. 4
  290. 4
  291. 4
  292. 4
  293. 4
  294. 4
  295. 4
  296. 4
  297. 4
  298. 4
  299. 4
  300. 4
  301. 4
  302. 4
  303. 4
  304. 4
  305. 4
  306. 4
  307. 4
  308. 4
  309. 4
  310. 4
  311. 4
  312. 4
  313. 4
  314. 4
  315. 4
  316. 4
  317. 4
  318. 4
  319. 4
  320. 4
  321. 4
  322. 4
  323. 4
  324. 4
  325. 4
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349. 3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 3
  368. 3
  369. 3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. The early days of motor vehicle travel was no different to those before cars, just a lot faster. I have seen film footage back in the 20's in Britain of one car overtaking another only for it in turn to be overtaken during the process. That's got to be exciting if your in the oncoming car. Travelling on the left goes back to the Romans. Archaeologists excavated a Roman quarry in England and it was noticed that the side of the road leaving the quarry showed more wear then on the side entering the quarry. This could only have been caused by laden carts leaving the quarry, as those entering would be travelling light, and as it on the left side then Romans travelled on the left. Ford's any colour as long as it is black was actually a myth as other colours were available but black was the most used colour. I have a feeling it had something to do with costs as black paint was cheaper. The myth is one which Ford perpetuated themselves as in the 70's they brought out a car which could only be bought in black. As part of its advertising they included the slogan 'any colour as long as it is black', claiming it was used on the original Model T. But they later had to relent and sell them in other colours. Anyway research has shown the the Model T was available in other colours. You may want to look at a man called Percy Shaw who invented the Cat's Eye or Road Stud. I believe you call them Dott's Dots. Percy was in the finest tradition of the English eccentric who smoked cigars in a pipe, well he enjoyed both so why not. I may be wring but I believe a shed was involved.
    3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393. 3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. I some years ago remember reading Michael Howard's book on the Franco Prussian War and I was stuck by the utter mess the French had gotten themselves into with their mobilisation. Despite the fact that they were at war it was decided that civilians could travel be train as normal which meant the military had work their way around the civilians. Soldiers had to make their own way to their units, often finding that the regiment was no longer where they thought it was. They would then set off to the regiments next known location. Many men never did reach their regiments and ended up in ad hoc units cobbled together from whoever was on hand. The French cavalry attacks you mentioned were a complete disaster as the Germans were inside the buildings while the French were out on the roads. Result was that many of the French were simply shot off their horses. And both sides were using rifles so this added to the folly of sending cavalry into urban areas. You would think that soldiers would learn lessons from all this, but no. There was a cavalry charge against a unit of artillery. I forget the details but I think it was Prussians cavalry and French artillery. The charge was over 800 yards and as far as the Prussians were concerned it was successful as they took the guns. Proof, said many cavalrymen, that cavalry still had a place on the battlefield. Details omitted were that though the cavalry had to attack the guns which were 800 yards away, 400 of those yards were in dead ground. In other words they were only under fire for the last 400 yards. And the other detail missed was that half the cavalry died in the attack. You have to think that if not for the dead ground the rest of the regiment would have suffered the same fate.
    3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. Some memorials to the fallen of WW1 are both simpler and more local. The Pals Battalions would be raised locally. It may have been men from the same factory, or local sports team or even people from the same street. I grew up in a Street called Ella Street just off Newland Avenue. Four streets away is a street called Sharp Street. On the wall at the end of Sharp Street is a plaque dedicated to all those who died during WW1 who came from that street. This is one of a number of such plaques around the city. Some are now lost, ironically destroyed during air raids during WW2. Others have been removed and now reside in the Hull Street Life Museum. The Royal Mail has an office not five minutes from where I live and it has two plaques dedicated to postmen who died during WW1. When I have had occasion to visit the office I have taken time to red the names on the plaque. The plaque in Sharp Street is still there and I understand one or two others are still in our near their original position. Where I have found them I have taken the time to read the names. And like anyone interested in history I have wondered what happened to them. A more recent addition to the street plaques is in the railway station. In 2014 a number of plaques was put on display carrying the names of all those passed through the station but did not return. Over the years I have taken time to read their names as well. Just seems fitting that for even a brief moment someone thinks of them. For all those who think that people in prison should do something fitting with their time. These plaques were made by the inmates of Her Majesty's Prison Hull. I understand that those who worked on the project did so voluntarily.
    3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. I do vaguely remember this story but mostly because when there was a television programme about the trial. We had a number of three wheel cars built by a company called Reliant between 1952 with the final production in 2002. It was reasonably cheap to buy and as it had a motorcycle engine cheap to run. It was seen as a motorcycle so insurance, road tax and driving licence were for a motorcycle, again making it cheaper and easier to get in the road. It originally had an aluminium body but over time this was replaced with a fibreglass body. The downside is that it had the two wheels at the back and only one at the front, which meant it had a tendency to roll over if you took a corner too fast. Some have claimed this is a myth but I used to know someone who owned one and he had mentioned it had rolled over on several occasions. And the fibreglass body, though making the car lighter and easier to repair, could be a problem. I personally saw an accident when the driver of a Reliant pulled away from the curb without looking and was struck a glancing by a passing car. Though the other car took minimal damage, mostly scratched paintwork, the Reliant had a piece about a foot long knocked out of it. And I know of another accident were the entire bodywork disintegrated leaving the car with no bodywork at all. The only thing that save to family in the car from serious injury was the fact they were all wearing seat belts. Oddly enough those who drove these three wheeled Reliant cars were, for the most part, devoted to them and were not too happy when production finally ended. It one claim to fame was in an extremely popular British comedy series Only Fools And Horses as the main character drove Reliant Regal Supervan III.
    2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. I have come across Eugene Bullard's story before so I did know about him. Personal link here. My paternal grandfather served in the 124th Battery Royal Garrison and he fought at the Somme. So not far from Bullard. I think your figure for the number of black pilots is incorrect as I do know of at least one British pilot who was black. He was one of an unknown number of Black personnel who joined the Royal Flying Corps (RFC), the Royal Naval Air Service and, from 1 April 1918, the Royal Air Force. He was Sergeant Robbie Clarke and was accepted to undergo pilot training in England in December 1916 and having completed the course, Robbie qualified on 26 April 1917. in July 1918 he came under attack will flying conducting a photographic mission aboard R.E.8 when they were attacked by five enemy fighters. He was shot through the spine but later recovered. His observer survived unscathed. Interestingly he mentioned before becoming a pilot that he would like to transfer to another squadron to serve alongside a friend. A total of 15,600 Black volunteers joined the British West Indies Regiment, so was his friend in this squadron also like Robbie and came originally from this regiment. And if so did he also become a pilot. The British Army had at least one black officer, Walter Tull. Before the war he had been a professional footballer and with the outbreak of war joined the British Army as an enlisted man before eventually becoming a second lieutenant. Tull served in Italy and he was praised for his "gallantry and coolness" by Major-General Sydney Lawford, General Officer Commanding (GOC) 41st Division. He had led 26 men on a night-raiding party, crossing the fast-flowing rapids of the Piave River into enemy territory and returning them unharmed. He died in France on the 25th March during the First Battle of Bapaume, during the German Spring Offence. Despite the efforts of a number of people, and while under fire, his body was never recovered. He was greatly mourned by his men.
    2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. I do know of the Kingdom of Aksum and its importance in the region but it is good to hear of further details of the kingdom and those that lived there. I wonder if the term 'King of Kings' follows the ancient use, from the time of Ancient Egypt, whereby if you capture land from another kingdom you could claim to be a king of kings. I did read of one king in the ancient middle east capturing land from the neighbouring kingdom. He then sent a message to the defeated king saying am I now a king of kings. Obviously not someone to be goaded. You mentioned Rome and China. They were not only aware of each other but also had diplomatic relations with each other. Having said that China did invade the eastern part of the Roman Empire during the reign of Hadrian. A Chinese army was sent west to drive off a group who was causing trouble for the Chinese Empire on its western border. Having achieved that goal, and with no orders to return, the army carried on west. Eventually they defeated the Parthians and were told by some prisoners there was a greater prize to the west. So the army carried on west. But after several days, and with the prisoners giving further information, the Chinese realised they had accidentally invaded the Roman Empire and withdrew. Interestingly with an army of some 50,000 strong, and many of them elite troops, if the Chinese general had decided to continue into the Roman Empire Rome would have been in series trouble. At that time the Roman Army was scattered all over the empire. And even if all could be grouped together they may well have been out numbered. You have to wonder what the result would have been for the empire. Even if they had defeated the Chinese army, or at least driven them back, with too few troops to return it to Roman control, many having to stay on the border, it could mean the end of the Roman Empire. Alternatively it could mean the Middle East and parts if not the whole of Europe and North Africa coming under Chinese control. How about that for a complete change in word history.
    1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. We know the Romans called them Britons as there is a reference to them as the filthy Britains made by the Romans. They may have had a common language with other similar groups but the does not make them Celts, just as having the same language does not make Americans English. In England the Anglo Saxon period dates from the Romans leaving 410 CE until 1066 CE. So Anglo Saxon period. And if we want to talk about them as an ethnic group then they are the English, or Englisc if you want the correct spelling, as that is what they called themselves. The Renaissance starts in 1300 CE but European Medieval period ends in 1492 CE. Where as in England the Medieval period ends when Henry VII becomes king in 1485. Take your pick. Where I live the local Britons were referred to as the Parisi and are known for their chariot burials, one of which is on display in the local museum. As for what you call yourself. Well it can be confusing. The people of Wales call themselves Welsh. Recently a Welsh rugby player said he was proud to be British, and was immediately chastised by a Welsh politician who said he should in actual fact be proud to be Welsh not British. We'll skip the bit about them being related to the Ancient Britons. But you would think before you called yourself anything you should at least know what it is you are calling yourself. You see many people of Wales think that being from Wales makes you Welsh. Now to me they are Welsh, but not to their fellow countrymen and woman. But then to me the people of Scotland are welsh. As are the people of France, Germany, Italy and America. In fact anyone who is not English is welsh. You see the word welsh is in fact English, and means foreigner. So the people of Wales proudly declare themselves to be foreigners.
    1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. I must admit I have never understood why elephants were used in warfare, Indian or otherwise. They seem to be as much a threat to your own side as they are to the enemy. And once you are familiar with how to defeat them any advantage is lost. I am reminded here of the German soldiers reaction to the first tank attack in WW1. At first many of them ran away in fear but once they had methods to deal with them they usually stood their ground and fought them. At least there was no danger of the tanks turning around and running amok in your own lines. So if they could not find these illusive North African elephant remains I assume they found those of their Indian cousins? Two quick thoughts. Firstly, what difference would it make if these were second or third generation domesticated African elephants. And secondly, I seem to remember something about a now extinct African jungle elephants which were smaller. Could these have been the ones Hannabel used? As to Zama I can think of a couple of possibilities here. The elephants may have been there, after all they are closer to the source, but Polybius, or someone else, increased their number but make Scipio's victory even more impressive. Or, over time there was additions to the story, and adding in the famed, or infamous, elephants would be obvious. And bearing in mind the story of Hannibal bringing them over the Alps showing how they could be defeated would stop the citizens of Roman having sleepless nights for fear of being trampled by elephants while they slept. While writing this I was reminded of how things are repeated. I remembered reading of an army were they disguised camels as elephants to make the enemy think they had more elephants then they really had. They fitted the camel with a wooden frame with material on top to make it look like an elephant. During WW2 the British Eighth Army, in preparation for the First Battle of El Alamein, disguised tanks to look like trucks and trucks to look like tanks. The even used trucks to cover the tank tracks and tanks to cover the truck track. Nothing if not thorough. This fooled the German Afrika Corp into thinking that they would be facing infantry when they were, in fact, facing tanks. The thing which puzzles me about the camels disguised as elephants is why didn't anyone wonder why these "elephants" had such thin legs. :) Like you I have a life long love of history and my degree is in archaeology.
    1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1