Comments by "Big Blue" (@bigblue6917) on "Monsieur Z" channel.

  1. A very interesting timeline very thoughtfully presented. One biproduct would be that America would not get the huge boost to its economy and industry it did in WW1 as suppling military equipment and financial help would not have happened. This could also mean that they Wall Street crash would not have happen as the circumstances would be changed. I have come across another alternative timeline which kept the Triple Alliance but instead of sending troops to France, Britain, still using its navy as in WW1, provides financial help to France. France would probably go the same was as they did in 1870, and also probably in the same time scale, but it would mean Britain would not suffer the loses in men, material and money as they did in WW1.
    6
  2. Funnily enough I watched a video about the attempted assignation of Roosevelt earlier today and I possed the question as to what would happen if he had won the 1912 election with regards to WW1. Interestingly if WW1 had ended in 1916 then all the problems of 1917, the French Army mutinying , the uprisings in Russia, fighting by the Italians grinding to a halt and the Austro-Hungarian Empire heading for collapse, would never have happened. One of the outcomes may well have been that there was no communist take over in Russia and the effects and problems that caused for most of the 20th century. thanks for your insights
    5
  3. If von Stauffenberg had included the unarmed explosive with the armed explosive it would have had the effect of killing Hitler.
    1