Comments by "Big Blue" (@bigblue6917) on "Russia issues nuclear threat to Europe" video.

  1.  @askedkedeldeif  As some 40% of Russia's tank loses in Ukraine are the latest and most up to date version of the T-72, despite making up only some 20% of the Russian tank force, the evidence does not support that idea. They have sent in their best and it has done little good for them. Besides who would send in their weakest forces to lead an invasion. That would not make any sense militarily. And let's not forget that they used the 331st Guards Parachute Regiment at the beginning of the war. And they are supposed to be the best of the best. That is the regiment which not only failed to take their assigned target, a Ukrainian airfield, but also lost their colonel as well. We all looked at them and thought of the old Soviet Union military. But Russia has been in economic decline even before the Soviet Union collapsed. And it has been going downhill ever since. Economic cutbacks have led to a steep decline in all areas of Russian life. Where is the much vaunted T-14. There should have been 2,300 in service by now. They are now saying they will not enter service until 2025. There are a number of reasons why they are not in service and will not be for some time, if ever. One is simply the Russia's economy cannot afford them. Another reason is that cutbacks in education means they are having to buy most of the parts from abroad because they have no more engineers to make the parts themselves. They have had to shut down the tank factory where they are made because they do not have anything to make new ones. Not even the T70s. And let's not forget the sales of Russian aircraft have fallen through because things like the engines are very poor and the radar is about 30 years out of date. Turns out the Russian military is not, as we thought, ten feet tall. In fact they are struggling to look four feet tall. It turns out that the Russian bear is a paper tiger.
    18
  2. 7
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1