Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. Hyroxychloroquine is ALSO contra-indicated for heart patients.
    5
  2. That's a correct perspective, and why everyone should wear masks: presume that everyone is infected. Trump doesn't want testing, because it won't "keep the numbers low," and wont let him escape that it IS his fault.
    5
  3. The tests shouldn't be put on the market, unless the private market will provide them for free. According to the Rhode Island govdrnor, CVS has established that it will provide free testing. The hitch, of course, is not having tests to administer.
    4
  4. The Iowa outcome indicates that the Democrats want a young moderate. There was loud and enthusiastic support for Mcgovern -- and he was nowhere near far-LEFT. Nixon won by 49 states. And a major factor in that was that the far-LEFTR ALIENATED the voters needed for Democrat McGovern to win. Carville has had success in elections. How much success have Sanders "fans" had? They not it all, so can't be wrong -- except they don't, and are.
    4
  5.  @marvinthemartian857  You're leaving out Russian subversion of the election, the Comey letter, and Sanders trashing her and the Democratic Party even after he LOST the primary because the majority of Democrats voted for the ACTUAL Democrat.
    4
  6. Sanders is a vindictive prick, which he reealed in 2016. He hasn't changed. Attacking BIDEN is NOT going to stop TRUMP, which is PARAMOUNT.
    3
  7. Tell it to the VOTERS, becuase they are driving the election. After all, you know it all: stopping Trump is PARAMOUNT, so let's insult, smear, and attack DEMOCRATIC VOTERS.
    3
  8. The biggest immediate explosion of cases in Massachusetts was at a bioTECH -- no joke -- conference in Boston, said to have infected 90-plus.
    3
  9. MSNBC didn't conduct the primary, moron. The DNC did not run the primary, moron. EVERY candidate, INCLUDING SANDERS, directly monitors election processes, from beginning to end. So, no, moron: Sanders is not a "victim". In 2016, Sanders "fans" were whining because in some states there are primaries, rather than caucuses Now they are not whining that the problem is caucuses, but instead its the mainstream media. If it isn't a far-LEFT ideological freak-show fulminating pie-in-the-sky speculations and bogus conspiracy theories, then Sanders "fans" will attack -- not because the mainstream media is biased, but becuase they don't like the FACTS being reported. What they WANT is far-LEFT division and domonizing. Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Blowing Iowa out of proportion with stupid conspirabunk based upon not knowing how -- thanks to Sanders misinformation -- elections ACTUALLY work helps Trump. Is that what you want?
    3
  10.    Persoanl attack noted -- and that's all you have: you aren't sufficiently informed to actually address the issues. Your no differnt tthan the Trump assholes. Ask yourself if this is coincidence: Two partners -- one of them Paul Manafort - worked together to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine. That campaign included computer hacking. The next campaigns those two partners managed were Sanders' and Trump's. Moreover, the Sanders campaign was caught early in the primary hacking the DNC -- and Sanders' campaign manager was forced to resign. Computer hacking is not only corrupion; it is a felony. Computer hacking in order to subvert elections sound familiar to you?
    3
  11. And you know those are "facts" because you made them up -- correct?As I've said many times: Trump and Sanders "fans" are identical: if you criticize the candidate, their "fans" attack the critic/don't defend their candidate.  Because they can't because they don't know enough about politics, political history, or the vaporware that is the image they have of Sanders -- who they DON;T ACTUALLY KNOW.Look at his voting record: three bills passed during twenty-five years because he has been totally INEFFECTIVE.He voted FOR the extremist Right-wing domestic terrorist organization agenda by voting to PROTECT the gun industry.  Nothing "Socialist" in siding with the ANTI-"Socialist" NRA.
    3
  12. I thank this doctor: his is the most up-to-date, accurate, and comprehensive statement of the reality I've heard. And he's correct that there are two known strains of the virus. Where I am the local medical facility is setting up, in a school cafeteria, a testing location for the larger community. (That has been urged by both state and city gov't.) At this point, though, it is -- properly -- for those on the front lines, and those who meet the stringency of the "criteria". Ultimately, there should be no "criteria"; everyone who wants should be able to be tested. And there's this: Rachel Maddow reported on a small town in Italy -- 3,300 -- that tested EVERYONE. The infected were quarantined, and the spread of the virus STOPPED IN ITS TRACKS.
    3
  13. It is up to the VOTERS, moron -- exactly as the VOTERS cleaned Sanders' clock. REALITY: the VAST MAJORITY of VOTERS are MODERSATES -- and view Socialism as NORTH KOREA. Your ignoring that REALITY isn't going to change it. and take it from Progressive Eleanor Roosevelt: you can't change the system by throwing mud at it from outside.
    2
  14.  @michelewalburn4376  Personal attack noted, and presented as evidence that you have no substance. Sanders and Trump "fans" are identical: criticize the candidate, be attacked -- which is not a defense of the candidate. I personally knew Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin (ever hear of them?) They were assholes -- and I was so far Left I was off the political spectrum altogether. During the 1960s, it was the ALIENATION of the mainstream majority by the far LEFT -- Hoffman, Rubin, the Socialists -- who got NIXON elected. In brief, I've been politically aware and active since 3rd grade -- during the 1950s. When were you born? Smearing Democrats, and making up horseshit conspirabunk out of ignorance and mendacity is corrupt -- and it helps Trump, exactly as Sanders did in 2016. Blowing Iowa out of propoprtion out of ignorance and mendacity is xorrupt -- and helps Trump. Shall we assume that the far-LEFT ACTUALLY wants Trump re-elected?
    2
  15. @Richard Butt Sanders and Trump are the two sides of the same coin of demagoguery. And it doesn't surprise that a Sanders "fan" would support tyranny over the rule of law.
    2
  16.  @benfatai756  The mainstream media has been reporting FACTS you don't like -- like the Sanders' campaign hacking of the DNC early in the primary. And it is typical of Trump/Sanders "fans" to blame the media when they don't like and want to avoid the facts. Next time you open your mouth to smear others you DON'T KNOW of being "corrupt," stop and look in your mirror. Do you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that your childish name-calling is going to earn you friends and Sanders supporters? Are you too stupid to know how stupid you are?
    2
  17.  Spork Spatula  IN FACT various candidates' supporters DID switch camps in order to make one or another candidate viable -- there were INTERVIEWS with some of them. So, no: the media isn't lying; you just don't like the FACTS being reported. Stating these FACTS about Sanders is only "attack" by the corrupt Sanders' "fans" who HATE THESE FACTS: 1. Sanders 2016 campaign manager -- who was forced to resign when the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC -- was a partner of Paul manafort, and both worked in Ukraine to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president. Is it a coincidence that they became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns? 2. During the 2016 primary, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Clinton released 30 years of hers and Bills the day she announced her candidacy. And no one had to ask her to do so. What was Sanders hiding? 3. Sanders, the far-Left "Socialist" voted to PROTECT the gun industry --- which was a top priority of the far-RIGHT ANTI-"Socialist domestic terrorist organization NRA. 4. Only two candidates during the 2016 campaign had "fans" -- which is from ENTERTAINMENT; all others, recognizing that politics is not entertainment, had supporters. Go ahead: call me names for not suffering the corruption of selective amnesia, calling Sanders critics names because you can't defend him against the facts, practiced by Sanders' "fans". FACE REALITY: With Republican gerrymandering -- affirmed by the Supreme Court, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreignpowers to subvert the election, Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. In addition, his "fan" "base" that smears Democrats -- which helps Trump -- and name-calls and insults those who state the facts about Sanders is not a successful means to persuade voters to vote for Sanders. FACE REALITY: Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And Sanders' writings, from when he was in his 30s, about young children and sex would be blasted all over the media. And what about his writings asserting that sex prevents cancer? Are there women stupid enough to fall for that pick-up line? I've been active in politics for more than 60 years. Older people tend to know stuff that young people haven't learned yet. You obviously haven't learned that insulting people and calling them names isn't a way to make friends or win support for your candidate. So you fall for Sanders' Politics of Paranoia -- he's a millionaire with power; he is NOT a "victim" -- and attack anyone who states the facts about Sanders in effort to keep yourself blind to themm. And that, your behavior, is CORRUPT.
    2
  18. The electorate is tired of the chaos. Sanders promises more of the same. And the vast majority of the electorate is centrist.
    2
  19. They are not a university; they are a far-right fruit-fringe propaganda mill.
    2
  20. The mass wearing of masks in China began in the heavily-polluted Bejing by the explosion in the transportational change from bicyles to motor vehicles.
    2
  21. The Democrats -- Clinton -- won the popular vote by 3 million.  The Democrats lost because of Sanders trashings, Comey, and the Russians.Those actual facts -- the reality -- do not support your petulant delusion.Bernie was an asshole then, and he is an asshole now.  And he is making the same mistake now that he made then: attacking the Democratic Party.  Or do you believe that his name-calling insults are how he'll persuade the Democratic Party to vote for him?
    2
  22. Trump is a one-trick pony.  So is Sanders.
    2
  23. Sanders is lying about Ronmney by asserting that Romney is a "man of faith". Romney voted "NO" on the Article of Impeachment concerning Obstruction of Congress -- EVEN THOUGH IT IS ONGOING. Christ is said to have said of the wealthy, "Give your money away." Romney is a "deeply religious" "Christian" -- and deeply wealthy, and he isn't giving it away. As for "love they neighbor/enemies," Romney is a predatory capitalist.
    2
  24. Warren is better informed than Sanders.  And she's accomplished much more during her few years in the Senate than Sanders accomplished during his twenty-five years in Congress.
    2
  25.  @waterandafter  That isn't how the Iowa caucus works, moron. There are three numbers. Sanders is relying only on the first, not the third. The third is the final, and that has Buttigeig with the edge over Sanders. But go right ahead -- swallow and regurgitate Sanders' lie on the point, and pretend to yourself that telling a lie is acceptable so long as you wash your mouth out afterward with the lie that lying isn't corrupt. Face reality: with Republican gerrymandering -- affirmed by teh Supreme Court -- Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, Democrats need all the votes they can get. But Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. ADD IN, that constantly smearing DEMOCRATS as being "corrupt" -- WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE -- is an INSULT that ALIENATES democrats. AND THAT HELPS TRUMP. But go right ahead -- persist in the childish pretence to being superior to the vast majority of voters, who are moderate/"centrist," which to Sanders and his "fans" are dirty words. And you'll bring Trump down on all of us -- including yourself.
    2
  26. Another Constitutional illiterate. 1. The ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time. That includes ALL FOUR of the "Militia Clauses" -- the Second Amendment being the foruth. 2. The Constitution is the supreme Law of the Land. That means that the Militia is UNDER the law, in keeping with the Founders concern that the military power -- there was ONLY the Militia -- ALWAYS be subordinate to and governed by the civil power -- the GOV'T. It is ALWAYS to be REGULATED UNDER AND BY the rule of law -- not the enemy of it. It's even addressed in the Declaration of Independence as a grievance against England: "He [i.e., King George III] has affected to render the Military indepdent of and superior to the Civil Power." The Founders are against you. Ask yourself: how do you defend the Constitution by opposing it? The commander-in-chief of the states' Militia are the states' GOVERNORS. When Federalized, the Coammnder-in-Chief of the Militia" is the PRESIDENT. 3. The first Militia Clause defines the Constitutional purposes of the Militia: law enforcement, SUPPRESSION OF INSURRECTIONS, and repeling invasions. 4. The seonde Militia Clause stipulates that CONGRESS shall organize, ARM, and discipline the Militia. And both in keeping with the Supremacy Clause, and that Clause, the states' Militia, even when NOT Federalized, is regulated BY CONGRESS. In the event you do know, Congress MAKES THE LAWS, which are REGULATION. All the jabber about Militia you are spouting is directly from law-illiterate anti-American RIGHT-wing crackpots. "Heller" is the outlier: there has never been an "individual right" in the Second Amendment as ratified. The ONLY "individual right" DEBATED by the first Congress that WROTE it was the right to be EXEMPT from Militia DUTY. That was DROPPED prior to ratification of that Militia Clause. There's a lot of irresponsible loose talk from the law-illiterate, and other law-illiterate fools reach for that anti-American gibberish as a fantasy "solution" to the anti-Americanism.
    1
  27. The mainstream media is distrusted by morons. They prefer the fringes, where the worms are. because they don't grasp that Seder and his ilk are not trafficking in FACTS. But Seder is probably too full of himself/stupid to realize that by attacking DEMOCRATS he is helping TRUMP and the Republicans.
    1
  28.  @tedtrash  But we shouldn't call Sanders' "fans," such as yourself, for being a hypocrite on the point. 1. Sanders, who claims to be a Leftist, voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a top priority for the extreme RIGHT-wing domestic terrorist organization NRA. 2. I used to listen to Sanders every Sunday on "Air America," and liked everything he said. Then I saw him campaign in 2016, beginning with his promise to destroy the Democratic -- not the Republican -- Party. And once granted his "request" to run as a Democrat, he continued to trash the Party, his campaign was caught hacking the DNC, and he continually smeared Clinton with Republican/RIGHT-wing lies. Clinton did not respond in kind because she -- being, unlike Sanders, politically savvy -- didn't want to alienate Sanders voters. In sum, he showed himself to be a vindictive prick -- and he and his CORRUPT "fans' show that they are the flip side of the Trump coin. Sanders/Trump "fans" -- "fans" are of entertainment, not of the serious matter of politics -- are identical in more than one way: A. Criticize the candidate, the "fans" attack the critic -- which is not a defense of the candidate. B. Attack and smear others -- then when called on it for the CORRUPTION it is, proffer the two-year-olds' non-"argument, "They did it first!" Sanders is wealthy -- but to Sanders "fans" everyone who is wealthy is therefore a "corporatist" and therefore "corrupt" -- the sole exception being sloganizer Saint Sanders. 3. During the 2016 campaign, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. And now he is again standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump by refusing to release his medial records. 4. During his twenty-five years in Congress, Sanders was totally ineffective as a legislature because he REJECTS the democratic process, which IS the legislative process: debate, negotiate, COMPROMISE, achieve a majority consensus.. And you believe the absurd fantasy that he would "change the world" from OUTSIDE the Congress. Reason is not your strong point. Neither are ethics or morality -- adhering to the facts, and reason -- a concern for you. There are two forms of lying: A. Commission. Telling a known falsehood. Sanders and his "fans" do so constantly. Sanders' current claim to have opposed the Iraq invasion is a misrepresentation of the facts B. Omission. Withholding a known truth. Sanders is refusing to release his medical records? So much for "transparency". You're either a Russian troll or bot, a Trump supporter, or a person so politically naive that you've fallen for old-hat pie-in-the-sky Socialist slogans. FACE REALITY: Since at latest WWII, the US population has been indoctrinated since earliest childhood to fear and hate Communism/Socialism, which in their minds is such as USSR, North Korea, and Cuba. Were sanders the nominee, the ads against him would include VIDEOS of him praising Communist/Socialist Castro, and praising Communist/Socialist Sandinistas against the United States. With Republican gerrymandering (protected by the Supreme Court), Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will nonetheless vote for him again before they'd ever vote for a Socialist. Joy Read is not lying; she is reporting FACTS that you don't like. And that is YOUR corruption, which is identical to Trump's and his moronic MAGAots: LIE by calling FACTS you don't like "lies". Sanders is no less a demagogue than Trump.
    1
  29. The air one exhales is moist. The moisture is in miniscule droplets.
    1
  30. None of which is original with your experience.  All talking points, all the timeAnd YOU KNOW that Trump is a constant LIAR.  Why do you LOVE being LIED to?
    1
  31. This is an excellent episode, Sam, essentially because you are silent, and the doctor is given all the room needed to be both comprehensive and detailed. And your questions of him have been consistently excellent.
    1
  32. TRUMP is the CLEAR AND PRESENT dANGER -- and you're off in the weeds talking rag-time about pie-in-the-sky FANTASIES. "Policies" are secondary to that which is paramount: stopping Trump and the Republicans. Instead, you assholes are attacking DEMOCRATS, while the Republicans continue to implement their subversion of the Constitution. Who willl you BLAME if Sanders is the nominee, and Trump slaps him dizzy with the VIDEOS of Sanders praising Communist/Socialist Castro, and praising the Communist/Socialist Sandanistas against the United States -- the Democrats? Or will you blame the source of that stupidity, Sanders? Are you so invested in running away from REALITY -- TRUMP is the issue -- that you know NOTHING about Sanders' actual history? Clue: North Korea claims to be Socialist. The USSR claimed to be Socialist. Cuba claimed to be Socialist. And you beliee that the US electorate shares your selective amnesia/ignorance?
    1
  33. Love your baseless divisiveness -- it helps Trump.
    1
  34.  Cousin Jimmy Farha  Sanders gravitates toward MONEY: he's a MILLIONAIRE -- and despite his "Socialism," he isn't distributing it among his "fans".
    1
  35. Let's dishonestly change the subjet -- that's the typical practice of Sanders "fans"; it is DISHNOEST, and that is CORRUPT. Sanders is a vindictive prick, as he SHOWED in 2016 by, first, promising to DESTROY the Democratic -- NOT REPUBLICAN -- Party. Then, when the Party graciously allowed him to run as a Democrat -- he STILL not a registered Democrat -- he CONTINUED to trash the Party, and contiuously smeared Clinton with REPUBLICN/RIGHT-wing LIES. The Vermont Democratic Party has supported Sanders -- INCLUDING WITH CASH -- thoughout his career. And how does he show his gratitude? By insulting, smearing, and attacking the DEMOCRATIC PARY -- and the Democratic VOTERS. And let's not forget: Devine and Manafort were PARTNERS in Ukraine, helping elet the CORRUPT PRO-Russian president. Next, out of nowhere, Devine and Manafort became -- coincidentally? -- managers of the Sanders and Trump campaigns. Then, shortly thereafter, the SANDERS campaign was CAUGHT hacking the DNC -- and Devine was forced to resign. Can you say CORRUPTION? And throughout the campaign, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with TRUMP with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Let's be HONEST on the point: when Clinton announced her candidacy, she AT THE SAME TIME released THIRTY YEARS of tax returns. This time around Sandes is standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump by refusing to release his medical records. What is he hiding? Not the fact that he considers himself to be superior to everyone else -- an arrogance identical with Trump's. Sanders smeared the hell out of Clinton over the "Crime Bill". But at the time Clinton was the First lady, while Sanders was in the Congress, where HE voted FOR the "Crime Bill". Other than being TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE during his TWENTY-FIVE YEARS in Congress -- he got NONE of his yapping of passe pie-in-the-sky enacted into LAW -- and that is becuase he REJECTS DEMOCRACY. The legislative process is quintessentially DEMOCRACY, and therefore INCLUSIVE, and therefore by NATURE INCREMENTAL. It is based on debate, negotiation, COMPROMISE, in order to arrive at MAJORITY CONSENSUS. Sanders REFUSES to COMPROMISE, because he's ALWAYS RIGHT and NEVER WRONG. And his ANTi-democratic "My way or the hghway" got the proper response from his colleagues: "TAKE A HIKE". What else has Sanders 'accomplished"? He voted AGAINST the "Brady Bill" FIVE TIMES. He voted to PROTECT the gun industry. Those were TOP PRIORITIES of the extremist RIGHT-wing ANTI-Socialist NRA. But let's not look beyond Sanders' passe pie-in-the-sky rhetoric -- else one see who he actually is: a vindictve prick and liar. Trmp would slap him dizzy, and bury him under the stench of his own baggage -- VIDEOS of his praising Communist/Socialist Castro and the Sandinistas; writings, while in his THIRTIES, about sex and very young children. Newbies to politics tend to FAIL to respect wisdom -- if they even recognize it: ACTIONS speak louders than words. All you pay attention to is WORDS -- Sanders is not saying anything that is NEW; he's been jabbering the same things during his entire career -- and getting NONE of it enacted into LAW. And you believe he could get that done, for the first time, from OUTSIDE the Congress, where the laws are made? If you believe that, you define yourslef: political newbie. Yes -- you believe you know it all; but it's the VOTERS who are driving the primary elections, not those Sanders instructs you to HATE based upon HORSESHIT. Last but not least: you are no different than Trump MAGAots: criticize the candidate, you attack the critic -- which is NOT a defense of the candidate. But it is DISHONEST, and therefore it is CORRUPT.
    1
  36. He is SAYING, BY IMPLICATION, that being on a ventilator means 100 per cent DIE. So he is writing off those on ventilators, and by further impllication saying, "There's no point in distributing ventilators because those people are going to die ANYWAY."
    1
  37. Sanders has his own "interest group," properly called CULT.
    1
  38. More than two weeks ago, Trump's own H.H.S preidcted that this catastrophe will pserist for more than 18 months -- there won't be a vaccine for at least 12 to 18 months -- hit in recurring waves, and 2.2 MILLION dead. Even if it weren't worse than a flu, Trump's conscious mishandling of the issue would result in an out-of-control pandemic and thus an elevated percentage of deaths. As for percentage of fatalities between a flu and COVID-19: the sata isn't all in yet, so that can't be determined with precision. But at its peak in Italy, the rate of fatalities was 12 per cent. Boris Johnson is in intensive care. In the UK, 50 per cent are hospitalized, 15 per cent go to in ICU, and 5 per cent die.
    1
  39. Redfeld is not the head of CDC. But the CDC head -- the one confronted by Katie Porter -- is a Trump POLITICAL appointee. Was the CDC test "flawed," as reported? Or was it pulled back because Trump wanted to "keep the numbers low"?
    1
  40.  @speks36  If Sanders is the nomine, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week. Learn some HISTORY: Since at latest the end of WWII, the US population has been indoctrinated, since earliest childhood, to hate and fear Communism/Socialism. Sanders cannot overcome that fact; and if he is the nominee, you'll see a flood of ads with VIDEO of Sanders PRAISING Communist/Socialist Castro, and PRAISING the Communist/Socialist Sandinistas against the United States. Trump is a clear and present danger RIGHT NOW AND GOING FORWARD. You are swallowing and regurgitating pioe-in-the-sky FANTASIES that are NOT going to happen in the face of the CLEAR AND PRESNT Trump and Republican threat to the Constitution. to the rule of law. This is not a time to smear eveyone else as corrupt as a True Believer in -- take your pick -- Sanders or Trump. Like it or not, the mainstream is the MAJORITY. As are Trump's "fans," you are kissing the ass of a wholly INEFFECTIVE extremist. The MAINSTREAM WILL NOT vote for a Socialist (oh -- he's now a DEMOCRATIC Socialist? why is he using dodgy language?). Now do your usual: attack and smear -- without a shred of evidence -- the Sanders critics -- EXACTLY the sasme as Trump "fans" do. Or learn to THINK, LOOK BEYOND the rhetoric to who and what is behind it. INFORM YOURSELF of the FULL history, notonly that fed you by the far-LEFT. Your faction got NIXON elected. And the origins of the poison now facing us was NIXON.
    1
  41. He did win by delegates. That's how the Iowa caucus works. There are three stages -- first the number of votes -- which Sanders calims HE won. The final stage is the DELEGATE count -- which BUTTIGIEG won. What matters, moron, are not the votes but the delegates. In 2016, Sanders and his "fans" wanted EVERY state to be a coaucus. Well, you got your wish in Iowa: now LIVE WITH IT, instead of making up bullshit and divisively smearing others becuase you can't stop whining about HORSESHIT. TRUMP is the issue; Sanders' pie-in-the-sky is RUNNING AWAY FROM THAT into FANTASY.
    1
  42. The reporter simply helped Trump show what he already is.
    1
  43. FOOL: Attacking Bdien HELPS TRUMP. In so doing, you don't persuade that you are opposed to tyranny.
    1
  44. EVERYONE is affected by legislation. "A vote for me is a vote for ME!"
    1
  45. "Certain classes of people" -- Seder is projecting. Yes, moron: VIDEOS of Sanders PRAISING Communist/Socialist Cuba, and of his praising the Communist/Socialist Sandinistas WILL RESONATE WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Sanders: stop the self-indulgent ego-tripping: your read of history is self-serving crap. You don't know the 1960s; you don't know the 1950s; those who grew up during the eras -- Matthews, myself, DO know them. But let's ONLY preach to the choir -- maintain that fantasy contact high. Let's NOT talk to those who hold different views -- that runs the risk of LEARNING. And no, Seder, that was not the issue with Castro. And after Castro eliminated the problem -- the "elites" -- he became a dictator. No, Seder, it is not nuts: the far-RIGHT under Trump is favor its own criminals, and promising to prosecute its political opponents. The only difference between that authoritarianism and far-Left totalitarianism are the spellings. The majority is against Sanders, Seder. I knew Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, you did not: they were assholes, not to be role models. Yeah -- no recollection, and knowledge of history, no awareness of the necessity to KNOW HISTORY, as legitimate alternative to pot-fueled ideological claptrap fantasies.
    1
  46. He's trying to be "folksy". But, yes, he does sound like a drub dealer.
    1
  47. Carville has actually won elections. So those who can't compete call him names. Name-calling is CORRUPTION -- exactly as is TRUMP.
    1
  48. Don't forget to attack Biden and the Democrats when you get chance -- that helps TRUMP.
    1
  49. In a democracy, it's majority rule. The Senate is controlled by the Republicans. So the Republican obstruction is instead Democratic ineptitude!? Are you a fucking Russian? Or just stupid for free?
    1
  50. Gov. Cuomo has been doing -- for the entire country -- what TRUMP should be doing. And I agree: the Democrats NEED TO STAND UP, LABEL LIES AS LIES, and REFUTE the lies. Where is the healthy ELITE when we need them?
    1
  51. Mainstream media isn't picking a candidate. That's why they are news, but you are not.
    1
  52.  @GOCRAZY3  "Manufacturing Consent" is nothing new. Moreover, when the consent is to the FACTS, the "manufacturing" is constructive. One can be swallowed by media, one can reject -- and bash it -- altogther, or one can learn to distingusih between reporter and facts, and facts and opinion, and facts and propaganda. Yeah: I know it's "hip" for the naive to mistake cynicism for sophistication, and tus to fall into the trap of knowing it all, which latter is not possible. .
    1
  53. Sam Seder -- another miseducated-about-the-realities-of-the-1960s self-appointed pseudo-pundit pseudo-expert. Gad I am so tired or the boggings down in useless hypotheticals in which the FAR-Left so specializes -- while getting NOTHING DONE, which is ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE'S fault.
    1
  54.  @daddyaf945  I've been at this for more than 50 years. The vast majority of voters are MODERATE -- er, to quote Sanders "fans, "centrists," which to them is ubiquitous with the word "corrupt". They don't know what they are talking about, though they sure are full of themselves with kowing it all. It's oh-so-easy to spin pie-in-the-sky fantasies when reality is unknown and rejected. It isn't that complicated an equation, suggested "solutions" which do not exist IN REALITY notwithstanding: With Republican gerrymandering -- the Supreme Court held that the Federal gov't can't interene, which removes the Federal gov't from enforcing civil rights against state abrogation of them -- Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, and TONS more money than the Democrats have, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. But Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump willl vote for Trump before they'll vote for a Socialist. Further: Sanders "fans" are jabbering "oligarphs" as concerns Bloomberg. First, Bloomberg didn't inherit his wealth. Second, he has been a Democrat and a Republican becuase he isn't an ideologue. Third, he didn't run for office in 2017-18, but he did fund Democratic camapgins around the country, and that helped the Democrats win the House. And he has siad: if not the nominee, he will be putting his money into the campaign ANYWAY in suport of Democrats and against Republicans/Trump. The vast majority is moderate. What they want -- I don't think Buttigieg is the key -- is young and moderate. Sure, they are currently divided between voting for issues, and focusing on the most important issue: getting Trum[p and his openly criminal enterprise out of office. Hopefully that will increasingly shift to focusing entirely on the latter. Bloomberg recognizes the danger, the threat, to the rule of law that is the Trump-Barr alliance. That is paramount above all else.
    1
  55.  @inquisitive.lurker  Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And that he is leading is because young political newbies have their heads up his ass, and it causes them selective amnesia. Is it a coincidence that Manafort and his partner, who worked to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, ended up running both the Trump and Sanders campaigns? In that election Manafort engaged in computer hacking. Shortly into the primary, Sanders' campaign was caught hacking the DNC, and his Manafort-partner campaign manager forced to resign. But let's keep it simple: the vast najority will not elect a Socialist, especially when his history is blasted across the media. He'd be destroyed in a week.
    1
  56. @Salmon I didn't say anything about fiscal conservatives. Where did you get the idea that "centrists" are ipso facto "fiscal conservatives"? Seder, I listened to you and Garfalo on "Air America"t talk about the 1960s. I was there, you were not: you didn't know then what you were talking about, and you dom't know today. I've been politically aware and active for longer than you've been alive; Sanders is talking the same failed far-LEFT folderol that failed THEN. Wake up: Barr just established DOJ "policy" to "investigate" anyone who appears to be a political threat to Trump. While Treasury/Bar are withholding Trump's tax information from Congress, and rguing in court -- next step the SC -- that the demand for Trump's tax returns is "uncontitutional," immediately after the "acquittal" vote, two Republican Senators requested Hunter Biden's tax information from Treasury, and it was immediately provided to them. And you continue to talk ideological claptrap, and push the other vindictive prick, Sanders. Ask yourself if it is a coincidence that both Trump and Sanders' campaign managers were the same two people -- one of them Manafort -- who worked together in Ukriane electing the corrupt pro-Russian president who was subsequently pushed out by the Ukrainian people. And at the beginning of the 2016 primary, the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC, and the campaign manager was forced to resign. Yeah, I know: you're "anti"-corruption -- depending on whose.
    1
  57.  @chrishakala528  With Republican gerrymandering -- protected by the Suprme Court -- Republican voter-purgings, Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, and Barr's new "policy" of "investigating" any viable political threat to Trump, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist.
    1
  58.  @garyatkins7142  And the bi-partisan House bills focused on protecting the election are characterized by McConnell as "Socialist".
    1
  59. @Salmon I have no idea what "media" you're consuming that declares unnamed Democrats as being "corrupt" because "centrist," which automagically makes them "fiscal conservatives". And probably "oligarchs" -- but "certainly" an "oligarch" if wealthy -- one of the far-Left's new buzzwords. I've been politically aware and active for more than 50 years. I've heard all the divisive labelling and name-calling -- from the far-LEFT also -- especially during the 1960s. All the ideological jabbering is willful blindness. It is fingers in the ears. It is ignoring immediate reality by indulging in exuberant speculations. No matter the Democrat, the Republicans will smear them as "Socialist" becuase associated with Sanders. McConnell labels the bi-partisan election protection bills "Socialist" as excuse to ignore them. Yes: the vast majority are moderates, who the far-LEFT doesn't like, so they smear them as equivalent of the dirty word "centrist". Lebels, labels, labels; name-calling, name-calling, name-calling; childishness deluding itself that it is politically astute. So busy smearing the middle they haven't time to pay attention in real-time to what the Republicans -- and Barr -- are doing.
    1
  60. At its peak in Italy, the lethality was 12 per cent.
    1
  61.  @toddinthemiddle  So you're a short-witted sociopath.
    1
  62. Corporate media FOX is worried about being sued becuase of deaths resulting from its disinformation. A number of doctors should be at least as worried -- they haven't the deep pockets for legal defense that FOX does.
    1
  63. Seder's politics of paranoia has become audial. Here's hearing things. And he is hardly in the position to talk about "balance".
    1
  64. 1. Let's ONLY talk to people who agree with us -- it retains all that smug feel-good fantasy. 2. Let's NEVER talk to those who hold different views -- because in that is the danger of LEARNING AND GROWING.
    1
  65. Because he knows several facts that the know-it-all Sanders "fans" ignore: 1. With Republican gerrymandering, Republican voter-prugings, and Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. 2. The vast majority is moderate. Centrist. 3. Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Period. Full stop.
    1
  66. Seder: you weren't even a spark in your fathers eye while Carville was winning elections. And not talking about being Socialist WILL NOT stop the Republicans from calling Democrats Socialist. Sanders appeals to a specific crowd -- not to the broad electorate: young political know-it-all newbies. Carville's mistake was getting Bill Blinton elected twice. Medicare for All is "incredibly popular" with those with whom it is "incredibly popular". Get it through your inflated self-importance: you are NOT the majority. Yes, there is a center. And the vast majority is centrist. Condescendingly insulting the majority is stupid. Carville is correct. You, Seder, and your fellow know-it-alls, are not going to "direct' anything, except into the far-LEFT ditch. Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And how much did Sanders accomplish by being stubbornly anti-compromise for his twenty-five years in Congress? He was totally ineffective. Sanders would be slapped into dizzy befuddlement by Trump. And Sanders IS NOT going to "refashion" the electorate. Unless, of course, he is the other side of the same coin as Trump: a far-LEFT dictator.
    1
  67. You aren't a Republican, but you do believe the illusion. Face reality: with Republican gerrymandering, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign subversion of the election, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist,. And Sanders' writings, when in his 30s. about young children and sex will be all over the media. If nomiinated he'd be destroyed in a week. And if not nominated we'll likely hear the same excuse about "cheating" -- leaving out the fact that his first campaign manager was forced to resign when it was revealed that his -- Sanders' -- campaign hacked the DNC at the beginning of the primary. And then stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Yeah, I know: let's bury the facts about Sanders behind attacks on those who have the temerity to not forget the facts about him, and -- worse -- state them publicly. Let's, in short, be as corrupt as Trump's "fans".
    1
  68. What WOULD have heepened is that Sanders would have been hit with his WRITINGS from when he was in his THRITIES about how women's orgasms prevewnt cancer, and sexs and young children. The FAR-Left IGNORING his sleazy history is INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST. And THAT is CORRUPTION. The same goes for Sanders' FALSE claim to be "anti-establishment" -- when in fact as a member of Congress for THIRTY YEARS makes him quintessentially. And the younger political newbies WILL change their bahivors when reality hits them upside the head. And let's hear it from Cenk, whose poltics were roundly REJECTED, as were Sanders', by the ACTUAL VOTERS. And let's hear more from the FAR-Left white folks who deign to speak on relaities for people of color, becuase they know so much about it from direct esperience.
    1
  69. Sam: Your focus on the ISSUE is productive. But eliminate the MAYBES -- we get enough of that "suggestiveness" from both Far-Left and Far-Right conspiracybunkers. We DON'T need more of the same SOCIALLY CORROSIVE POISON. The FACTS are out there to ELIMINATE the guess-work, the maybes, the speculations. But you'll have to trust the MAINSTREAM -- PROFESSIONAL -- media, which means STOPPING the channeling of Far-Left pro-Sanders/anti-Biden/anti-Democrats bullshit propaganda. It the VAST MAJORITY of Democrtic VOTERS who have REJECTED Sanders and CHOSEN Biden. That is NOT "billionaires" and "elites".
    1
  70. It is a form of voter suppression, in this instance called HOLOCAUST.
    1
  71.  @crackaassedcracka  I thought you were protesting in DEFENSE of freedom of speech. But -- no: exactly llike the far-RIGHT, you are OPPOSED to the expression of views of which you disapprove. and you call OTHERS "corrupt"!?
    1
  72.  @c.l.freeman7654  Personal attack noted. Sanders and Trump "fans" are identical: they attack the critic -- which is not a defense of their candidate. It's just plain stupid. And it ALIENATES those you CLAIM to want to PERSUADE. I'm not at all "crying" about criticizing ANY candidates. What I oppose, punk, is the LYING BY AND AGAINST those you ASSHOLES DON'T KNOW, and are too damned stupid to have the sense to know what you're talking about. You're full of shit and bullshit slogans and buzzwords.
    1
  73.  @Gweezy12  Coincidence that corrupt Paul Manafort and Devne worked together to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, and then, out of nowhere, became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns? No leaps in logic in tht question, child. But let's ask you another relevant question: How do you think the non-Sanders "base" will react to Trump campaign ads with VIDEO of Sanders praising Communist Castro, and Communist Sandinistas against the United States? Believe they'll wait in line for the polls to open so they can vote for the Socialist? Now is not the time to "experiment -- we've already seen what happened with the Ttump experiment, pulled off by the totally politically ignorant.
    1
  74.  @hexstan179  I don't pick sides on that one -- or on being all caught up in claptrap ideological starightjackets. It isn't either or -- that isn't how REALITY works; it's BOTH far-KLeft and -Right. Peopkle don't adore politicians unless they are FOOLISH -- a central clue for which is their calling themselves "Fans," as if the politician is an entertainment celebrity. Politics is a whole different realm than entertainment. If Sanders "fans" haven't leaned the dangerous mistake of the pot luck politics of electing an extremist to "blow up" -- or "burn down" the system, then they haven't learned the meaning of responsibility of citizenship in a democracy. The cure for one extreme is not to revert to the other extreme; that sort of "politics" is only safely reserved for confinees in rubber rooms.
    1
  75.  @crackaassedcracka  Your anti-American CORRUPTION is showing.
    1
  76.  Ken Hudson  Your CORRUPTION is showing.
    1
  77.  @calmingwaves3134  In view of the fact that you reject my word, do that research for yourself. If you've not seen the VIDEOS of Sanders raising Communists/Socialists Castro and the Sandinistas, then you don't know your candidate. Isn't the ultimate stupidity to vote for a candidate about whom you are deliberately ignorant?
    1
  78.  @xiquotic1711  Your CORRUPTION is showing with the childish name-calling. As ever, the wealthy and powerful Saint Sanders is the paranoid victim. Learn how to grow up; then grow up. The Trump Criminal Enterprise is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER -- so let's attack DEMOCRATS.
    1
  79. One owns coyright in one's emails. But "Twitter" works by re-"Tweeting," so that would likely be viewed by the courts as an exception, perhaps "fair use"; else the "Twitter" platform would be illegal, but ruling so would interfere with "commerce" -- making money -- so that wouldn't be a likely outcome of such a suit.
    1
  80. When you smear Democrats you vote for TRUMP. Yeah, you believe destroying the country -- the Constitution and rule of law -- will be grat fun! "Revolution, baby!" Let's not talk about bloodbath.
    1
  81. You omit the fact that Sanders is attacking the Democratic Party.  Is that so you can pretend it's "unfair" (whine, whine, whine) that the Democratic Party responds in kind?Sanders attacked the Democratic Party even after it allowed him to run as a Democrat.  I assume his "fans" consider that the behavior of a "class act": as a guest in a neighbor's house, shit on the living room rug and demand praise for the achievement.
    1
  82. @Athena Chan 2003 Trump isn't anything; he has no actual position except his racism and vindictiveness. His "policies" are far-RIGHT. Sanders is the mirror image on the far-LEFT, except that he is all over the place with his attacks. And his votes: the vote to PROTECT the gun industry was central to the agenda of the extreme RIGHT-wing domestic terrorist organization NRA, which, as we know, laundered Russian money into REPUBLICAN politics. So tell us: was Sanders' vote to protect the gun industry -- tough shit for Newtown, El Paso, etc., etc., etc -- "Socialist"? Or did it feed the anti-American far-RIGHT gun loons who back . . . TRUMP? Those are hard questions which must be answered. But instead of confronting them head-on, Sanders' cult avoids them -- no defense -- and attacks his critics.
    1
  83.  @skwisgaar451  Not if we ignore the mainstream media because it doesn't preach Sanders 24/7. Wake up: by attacking the Democratic Party AGAIN -- the largest block of Liberal/Progressive/Left voters -- he is being divisive AGAIN. And what do his "defenders" do? They run with and enhance the divisiveness. The Republicans needn't do anything to divide-and=-conquer the Democrats: Sanders, and his cult followers, -- who are exultant in the fantasy that they know it all -- will do it for them. I saw exactly the same thing on the Left during the 1960s. And what happened to the Left? After the the US was withdrawn from Vietnam, it collapsed because it didn't have a new enemy to oppose. One's view must be based not on externals. One must have an informed moral compass. While I was the only one I knew during high school who was vocal against US involvement in Vietnam, 99 per cent of my peers were either wrapped up in TeeVee as their only source of information, or hanging out on the street corner complaining of being bored, and name-calling me for my position. The reason I knew US involvement in Vietnam was a fraud was because I READ HISTORY, centrally the anti-imperialism of REPUBLICAN Mark Twain. Vietnam was a repeat of the US's actions in the Philippines during the late 19th century. And why did McGovern lose? Not because he was far-Left -- he was not. And far-Left had even less a chance than he. Because Nixon talked of "peace with honor" vis-a-vis Vietnam. I knew there was no honor about any of it -- that the US was involved violated the Geneva Conventions. Sanders is a one-note song; and te only song most of his supporters have ever heard and listened to. He tells you to reject all other views -- AND YOU SHEEPISHLY OBEY THAT ORDER. So you smear imaginary "corporatists/centrists" because you know nothing of the gradations and greys. To hear the media -- including mainstream -- tell it, there are only "Left and Right". The political spectrum has many more degrees than that. And they aren't only Left-Centrist-Right. Liberals are Left of center, but to the Right of Progressive. and the Left, so-called, is to the LEFT of Progressive. The Left that is Sanders has ALWAYS DEMANDED that they get ALL of what they want NOW! And that's why they've never got it: the REFUSE to compromise in order to get AT LEAST SOME of what they want. Social Security is the perfect example: when first enacted it was not extended to African-Americans. Why? Because it needed the votes of Southern racists to pass. It was later AMENDED to correct that defect. The same is true of the Affordable Care Act: it is a BEGINNING, not the whole of what can be built on it. DEAL WITH IT: INCREMENTALISM is how DEMOCRATIC legislative process WORKS. One gets what one can -- compromise gets the votes of those opposed -- and then builds on it. Want "it" ALL NOW? Then prepare to be frustrated, because that ain't gonna happen.
    1
  84.  @skwisgaar451  His campaign of 2016. He promised to destroy the Democratic (why not the Republican?) Party. Then, when he was allowed to run as a Democrat, he continued to trash the Party, and smeared Clinton with RIGHT-wing lies. He caused CHAOS because that's all the moron can do to attract attention to himself, and then he can spew his old-school "Socialist" slogans to "the [faceless] masses". And the political newbies -- his "fans"; it's all about entertainment; nothing serious about life and death politics -- swallow that pie-in-the-sky without question. The Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'll vote for a Socialist. They have SAID so. And his cult of support is a MINORITY who declare themselves to be OUTSIDE the mainstream. Whereas the mainstream is the MAJORITY. Democracy is MAJORITY rule. Sanders is again showing himself to be hateful and vindictive, the "Left"'s version of Trump.
    1
  85.  @rolandshelley5165  The difference is, child, that I include FACTS. Sanders "fans" name-call and smear -- and are all bent out of shape about ALLEGED corruption of so-called UNNAMED Democrats, without a SHREd OF EVIDENCE -- but not a PEEP about the OPENLY CRIMINAL Trump. Sanders, ALLEGED far-Left, attacks his nearest allies, the Democratic Party -- but not the Republican Party. Why is that? And what in hell are "Ukraine Bernie supporters? Don't you MEAN RUSSIAN -- who SUPPORTED Sanders during 2016? Putin is playing both extremes -- extremism is STUPID -- against the STABLE middle, and Sanders' "fans" are following that scam like good little sheep. So long as one hates unnamed so-called "centrist" Democrats for UNEVIDENCED "corruption," all is good.
    1
  86.  Walter Newsom  Yes, he smeared Clinton with REPUBLICAN LIES. Your wilful amnesia is on you. Clinton released a documentary about Sanders? Ooooh! -- that's a no-no! -- only demagogue Sanders is allowed to do that! Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a TOP PRIORITY of the far-RIGHT ANTI-"Socialist" NRA. Defend THAT, pseudo-LEFTIST. Oh -- okay -- he was just pandering to get the votes of anti-American gun-nuts; nothing deceptive or corrupt in that . . .
    1
  87.  Walter Newsom  There seems to be a political faction who is experiencing a plague of amnesia about the 2016 primary, and the afflicted are all coincidentally Sanders "fans". AFTER he LOST the DEMOCRATIC Party primary to the ACTUAL Democrat, he did not withdraw, which was the adult thing to do. Instead he CONTINUED to trash the Party and Clinton. Oh, and don't bother to remember that he stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial LYING about releasing his tax returns. And is it a coincidence that Paul Manafort, who worked together in Ukraine to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president, showed up in charge of the Sanders and Trump campaigns? Have you also "put out of mind" Sanders' writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex? And what about those asserting that sex prevents cancer? Would any intelligent woman fall for that pick-up line?
    1
  88. Seder is a "master" at rejecting wisdom. Do you know why the draft applies to young men? Because the young men are untested, uninformed, and therefore easily coerced into being "patriotic" -- "thinking" with their emotions. Those who KNOW HISTORY, and are seasoned, tend to know better.
    1
  89. Attacking the Democrats helps Trump. Sanders made the same mistake in 2016. Or perhaps the results are what he wanted: a permanent Republican mnajority, as Karl Rove said is the goal.
    1
  90. If Sanders is the nominee, he will be destroyed in a week -- especially when his writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex are flooding the public media.
    1
  91. Dr. Fauci said: there's no SCIENCE in your information. Anecdotes are not SCIENCE. "I sutbbed my big toe, and it made me the greatest singer in history" is anecdote; both may have happened, but there is no proof that the toe-stubbing improved the singing..
    1
  92. Sanders: "Bloomberg is trying to buy the election." In fact, the Sanders campaign is trying to BUY the election the same way as Bloomberg: POLITICAL ADS THAT COST MONEY. Trump and Sanders are identical in playing the Politics of Paranoia -- they are wealthy and powerful "victims". Whine, whine, whine.
    1
  93. He isn't ignorant of the facts. What he is doing is acting within his area of expertise: as a career criminal. He knows what he's doing; he doesn't mind being thought "ignorant," because that grants him an "innocence" he doesn't deserve. It is letting him off the hook, just as calling him "malignant narcisist," even if true, gives him an excuse.
    1
  94. You are NOT going to replace with Joe Manchin with an Elizabeth Warren. "Rigitity"? Ever consider that the VOTERS -- who you cintinue to omit from your equation -- elect their chosen candidates? What are you doing about, as example, Southern racism, and the inability -- therefore -- of more centrist -- leave out FAR-Left -- Liberal candidates to get elected? Instead to attack the DNC -- not the racism, about which you all or so expert by ignoring your own -- is about as stupid as it gets. It is fundamentally ignorant of how elections actually work -- Sanders NOT being a source of the FACTS on that issue.
    1
  95. The "Democratic Establishment" is the vast majority of DEMOCRATS. Telling them to "Go to hell," Bernie, will not wing their votes. But you don't care about their votes; you figure you can get elected by a minority the way Trump did. Is Russia backing YOU this time? During his twenty-five years in Congress Sanders was totally ineffective at legislating. As for the presidency: "The president proposes, the Congress disposes." So Sanders calls people names -- and that appeals to whom? The intelligent? The mature?
    1
  96. He should be charged with practicing medicine without a license. And for those he has killed by doing so. Then there's "Dr. Oz" -- who has a name like "Oz" if not an acid head?
    1
  97. He should be charged with practicing medicine without a license. It isn't being "botched": Trump is acting within his area of competence: that of career criminal.
    1
  98. The media doesn't exist to "represent" you. It exists to report the facts -- regardless whether you like the facts. Sanders is a fraud: compare his rhetoric with his BEHAVIOR.
    1
  99. Seder doesn't have a clue beoynd his proud malconstrued knowledge of the 1960s Left. Bloomberg didn't run for office in 2017-18; instead he funded Democratic campaigns and helpd yake back the House. Bloomberg isn't an ideologue. No: ALL did not line up against FDR. And smearing Democrats -- as all the Sanders "fans" are doing -- helps TRUMP, who will slap Sanders dizzy.
    1
  100. Sanders "fans" are, in a word, stupid. They know it all, just like Sanders, and just like Trump. So smear Democrats and help Trump. "The fact of the matter is," Seder, that Bloomberg spent much money supporting DEMOCRATIC candidates, which is how the Democrats took the House. He has also siad: that if not the nominee, he will continue to fund DEMOCRATS and work with his money to DEFEAT TRUMP. How is smearing an ALLY different than Trump smearing the Bidens, or Ukraine? Yeah, I know: you hate those about whom you actually know nothing true -- Clinton, Biden -- and do the opposite with Sanders. Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a TOP PRIORITY of the extremist right-wing ANTI-"Soclaist"/ANTI-American domestic terrorist organization NRA. That's your boy, who claims to be a LEFTIST. Paul Manafort and his partner helped elect the pcorrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine who was subsequently pushed out by the Ukrainian people. Manafort and his partner next became the managers of the Trump and Sanders campaings. Coincidence? Are you so pro-Sanders/Trump that you're also pro-Russian?
    1
  101.  @CybershamanX  DURING THE PRIMARY, moron, Sanders REPEATEDLY trashed NOT ONLY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, but also Clinton with REPUBLICAN SMEARS that were ALL ALONG FALSE. Ask yourself, Mr. Amnesia: is it COINCIDEMCE, that the two men who elected the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine BOTH ended up in charge of Sanders' and Trumps campaign? That that Ukraine election included computer hacking? That at the beginning of the primary, the Sanders campaign hacked the DNC -- which forced the resignation of that campaign manager? That of all the candidates during the 2016 campaign, only two had not "suporters" but "fans" -- Sanders and Trump? Starry-eyed "fans" belong in ENTERTAINMENT, not in life-or-death politics. IS it COINCIDENCE that Sanders stoiod shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns? AFTER losing the primary, Sanders DID NOT WITHDRAW -- there was all the LYING about "thuimb on the scale": FOOL: elections are conducted by STATE GOV'TS, NOT by the parties. And EVERY candidate -- INCLUDING SANDERS -- MONITORS the primary process FIRST-HAND, from beginning to end. So: NO "RIGGING". Instead, he CONTINUED to trash the Party, and Clinton, with the "thumb on the scale LIE -- which can ony be believed by the know-it-all Sanders' "fans" who are IGNORANT of how primaries and elections are conducted, or the deliberately dishonest. All of that high profile NOISE negates any of his capaigning "for" Clinton AFTER all his trashings of her. "Shaman"? In other words, you live in a world of speculation without too much concern with facts. Facts are stubborn things. So is REALITY: with Republican gerrymandering protected by the Supreme Court from Federal intervention, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. Trump would slap Sanders dizzy; he'd be destroyed in a week. That is especially underscored when Sanders' writings, when he was in his 30s, about young children and sex are blasted all over the media. You don't know Sanders. What you "know" is what you read into his old-school Socialist slogans. Those slogans didn't work in the "radical" 1960s: they got NIXONG elected. They are all sizzle, no substance. Last but not least -- in addition to the fact that Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a top priority of the extremist RIGHT-wing anti-"Socialist" domestic terrorist organization NRA, yet another collaborator with Putin -- during his twenty-five years in Congress, Sanders passed three bills, two of those renaming post offices. That HISTORY is the result of the fact that he is a know-it-all; he is inflexible; he is "my way or the highway" no compromise. In some, entirely ineffective in getting ANY of his SLOGANS enacted into law because he REFUSES to compromise. The legislative process is DEMOCRATIC: it is debate, negotation, compromise, arriving at a majority consensus. Do you ACTUALLY believe that, being wholly ineffective while IN the legislative process, he'd be actually effective from OUTSIDE the legislative process? Old maxim: "The president PROPOSES, the congress DISPOSES." Instead of denying and "forgetting" the vindictive prick that Sanders was during the 2016 primary, WAKE UP: he is the far-Left -- "Progressivism" is to his RIGHT -- equivalent to extreme right-wing demoaguge Trump.
    1
  102. However small the margin in Iowa, Buttigieg edged Sanders. So Sanders is lying. And the largest gain in New Hamshire is by Buttigieg. So Sanders is trying to shout down the facts.
    1
  103.  Luis Monsanto  When were you born? Yesterday? You're a Sanders 'fan" who believes everyone is corrupt -- except Sanders and his "fans". The only way you get away with yourself with that is to ignore your corruption be flatly ignoring the facts, or indulging a false amnesia: Is it a coincidence that the two partners -- one being Paul Manafort -- who elected the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine -- ended up running the campaigns of Sanders and Trump? Were you paying attention, or are you deliberately ignoring the fact that early in the 2016 capaign, the Sanders campaign was caught hacking the DNC -- which forced his Manafort-partner/campaign manager to resign? Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Is it a coincidence that the only two candidates who have "fans" -- which are about ENTERTAINMENT -- instead of supporters -- POLITICs is NOT ENTERTAINMENT; it is LIFE-AND-DEATH -- are Sanders and Trump? If Sanders is the nominee, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week, esepcially when his writings, when in his THIRTIES, about young children and sex are blasted across the media. The far-Left and Sanders were talking the same old-school Socialist rehetoic, and engaging in their political disruptions in the 1960s and into the 1970s. They ALIENATED those we needed to elect McGovern -- the working and middle clases -- who was not far-LEFT. Nixon won 49 states. I was there. Were your PARENTS born yet?
    1
  104. Lets PRESSURE people, and pretend it's about "vuluntarism"/"freedom". Let's be frank: let's BULLY. Clue: the "infrastructure" already exists: it is called the system; it is called "the establishment". You don't make change by throwing mud-bombs at it from the outside. And to make change from within, one must ACTUALLY BELIEVE in DEMOCRACY, which requires COMPROMISE. But thanks for writing off the "Boomers" -- most other cultures recognize that the elders are the repository of WISDOM. But who needs "wisdom" is the "post-truth" generation. Let's resort to barbarism.
    1
  105.  @sheraldhill2728  Sanders is still ilving in the 1960s with a far-Left that no longer exists, except in the un- and mal-informed fantasies of hormonal teenagers who in fact don't know what they "missed" because they weren't there. It wasn't all sex, drugs, and rock & roll; it was also Vietnam and people being killed. It was Nixon prolonging the war, because the far Left ALIENATED those who would otherwise have stopped him. There is no yearning for a time of major assassinations of hope and progress. And these morons are smearing Barak Obama as if he were "status quo". They have no understanding of how radical it was that he was elected -- comfortably, and twice. So they fall for the nostalgia of old-hat pie-in-the-sky slogans from a man who was wholly ineffective during his twenty-five years in Congress. And they believe he is going to accomplish now what he hasn't accomplished during more than twenty-five years? How politically naive are his "fans"? -- it's all about celebrity and entertainment. They attack unamed so-called "centrist" Democrats, without a shred of EVIDENCE, for being "corrupt -- but not a peep about Trump and his OPEN criminality. There's a corruption in that that Sanders' "fans" are ignoring in themselves.
    1
  106. False.  the term "Moderates" or "centrists" encompass a range of positions, both Left of Center and Right of center.And FDR was a centrist.  Eleanor was the Progressive.  And Sanders is to the LEFT of Progressive.  The difference?  Progressives actually get things done -- see "New Deal"; Social Security; Medicaid and Medicare; Leftists pass three bills in twenty-five years.
    1
  107. There are a few Leftists.  But what was the Left -- the "New Left" -- of the 60s collapsed when it o longer had an enemy to blackguard. The Sanders Left and the Trump Right both rely on smearing others, in place of offering something positive, constructive, and VIABLE.
    1
  108. Sanders hasn't criticized Israel? Are they slamming Sanders because he's a Jew? Or are they slamming him for his pie-in-the-sky sloganized politics?
    1
  109. You ean you share the ideology of the "dissector".  That is not to be confused with being in touch with reality.
    1
  110. In a democracy, majproty rules. The Senate is controlled by the Republicans. Anyone who blames the Democrats for their obstruction is an asshole. Got that, Sam? -- ASSHOLE.
    1
  111. He has a better idea than you, Mr. Bias.
    1
  112.  @xXRickTrolledXx  Barney Franks described a Committee hearing in which Sanders offered an amendment -- and then the Democrats on the Committee had to rescue his amendment FROM HIM, because he so alienated potential support for it. Likr it or not, Hillary Clinton worked with him, and said that no one likes him. He is demanding, inflexible, and uncompromising. Not only is that antithetical to democracy, it is being totally ineffective. The FACT: he passed THREE bills in TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, two of those renaming post offices. Hillary Clinton accomplished volumes more during her 8 years in the Senate. And then there's another essay he wrote, while in his 30, in which he claims that sex prevents cancer. One would have to be an exceedingly stupid woman to fall for a pick-up line that bizarre. What will you do if he's the nominee, and the essay/s he wrote, while in his 30s, about young children and sex are blasted all over the media? Will you blame someone else for it?
    1
  113.  @Cussy69_420  Hillary Clinton accomplished a pages-long list of legislation for families and children What sort of people tear down the accomplished? Ask that question of yourself.
    1
  114. your real name is "Pretzel". That makes no sense =-- but it does alienate potential Sanders votes by smearing them -- which smearing is corruption per se. The only fear is that if Sanders is the nominee, he will LOSE. And in fact he'd be destroyed in a week. Especially when his writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex, are published everywhere. Go ahead: lie by omission by ignoring those facts. Lying being, of course, corruption. Sanders is a demagogue identical to Trump. And Sanders' "fans" are as much a cult as Trump's "fans".
    1
  115. Sam: you are not qualified to assess others cognitive functioning. And if you were, it would be UNETHICAL to attempt to do so across the Internet.
    1
  116. That's how cults work: there is only ONE Dear Leader. Everyone else is "corrupt". Wake up: you aren't opposed to corruption; you are opposed to only the "corrutpion" constantly ALLEGED by Sanders. you are all FOR Sanders' corruption.
    1