Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "James Carville TERRIFIED Of Democrats Chances In General Election" video.

The Iowa outcome indicates that the Democrats want a young moderate. There was loud and enthusiastic support for Mcgovern -- and he was nowhere near far-LEFT. Nixon won by 49 states. And a major factor in that was that the far-LEFTR ALIENATED the voters needed for Democrat McGovern to win. Carville has had success in elections. How much success have Sanders "fans" had? They not it all, so can't be wrong -- except they don't, and are.
4
@daddyaf945 I've been at this for more than 50 years. The vast majority of voters are MODERATE -- er, to quote Sanders "fans, "centrists," which to them is ubiquitous with the word "corrupt". They don't know what they are talking about, though they sure are full of themselves with kowing it all. It's oh-so-easy to spin pie-in-the-sky fantasies when reality is unknown and rejected. It isn't that complicated an equation, suggested "solutions" which do not exist IN REALITY notwithstanding: With Republican gerrymandering -- the Supreme Court held that the Federal gov't can't interene, which removes the Federal gov't from enforcing civil rights against state abrogation of them -- Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, and TONS more money than the Democrats have, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. But Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump willl vote for Trump before they'll vote for a Socialist. Further: Sanders "fans" are jabbering "oligarphs" as concerns Bloomberg. First, Bloomberg didn't inherit his wealth. Second, he has been a Democrat and a Republican becuase he isn't an ideologue. Third, he didn't run for office in 2017-18, but he did fund Democratic camapgins around the country, and that helped the Democrats win the House. And he has siad: if not the nominee, he will be putting his money into the campaign ANYWAY in suport of Democrats and against Republicans/Trump. The vast majority is moderate. What they want -- I don't think Buttigieg is the key -- is young and moderate. Sure, they are currently divided between voting for issues, and focusing on the most important issue: getting Trum[p and his openly criminal enterprise out of office. Hopefully that will increasingly shift to focusing entirely on the latter. Bloomberg recognizes the danger, the threat, to the rule of law that is the Trump-Barr alliance. That is paramount above all else.
1
@inquisitive.lurker Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And that he is leading is because young political newbies have their heads up his ass, and it causes them selective amnesia. Is it a coincidence that Manafort and his partner, who worked to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, ended up running both the Trump and Sanders campaigns? In that election Manafort engaged in computer hacking. Shortly into the primary, Sanders' campaign was caught hacking the DNC, and his Manafort-partner campaign manager forced to resign. But let's keep it simple: the vast najority will not elect a Socialist, especially when his history is blasted across the media. He'd be destroyed in a week.
1
@Salmon I didn't say anything about fiscal conservatives. Where did you get the idea that "centrists" are ipso facto "fiscal conservatives"? Seder, I listened to you and Garfalo on "Air America"t talk about the 1960s. I was there, you were not: you didn't know then what you were talking about, and you dom't know today. I've been politically aware and active for longer than you've been alive; Sanders is talking the same failed far-LEFT folderol that failed THEN. Wake up: Barr just established DOJ "policy" to "investigate" anyone who appears to be a political threat to Trump. While Treasury/Bar are withholding Trump's tax information from Congress, and rguing in court -- next step the SC -- that the demand for Trump's tax returns is "uncontitutional," immediately after the "acquittal" vote, two Republican Senators requested Hunter Biden's tax information from Treasury, and it was immediately provided to them. And you continue to talk ideological claptrap, and push the other vindictive prick, Sanders. Ask yourself if it is a coincidence that both Trump and Sanders' campaign managers were the same two people -- one of them Manafort -- who worked together in Ukriane electing the corrupt pro-Russian president who was subsequently pushed out by the Ukrainian people. And at the beginning of the 2016 primary, the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC, and the campaign manager was forced to resign. Yeah, I know: you're "anti"-corruption -- depending on whose.
1
@chrishakala528 With Republican gerrymandering -- protected by the Suprme Court -- Republican voter-purgings, Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, and Barr's new "policy" of "investigating" any viable political threat to Trump, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist.
1
@garyatkins7142 And the bi-partisan House bills focused on protecting the election are characterized by McConnell as "Socialist".
1
@Salmon I have no idea what "media" you're consuming that declares unnamed Democrats as being "corrupt" because "centrist," which automagically makes them "fiscal conservatives". And probably "oligarchs" -- but "certainly" an "oligarch" if wealthy -- one of the far-Left's new buzzwords. I've been politically aware and active for more than 50 years. I've heard all the divisive labelling and name-calling -- from the far-LEFT also -- especially during the 1960s. All the ideological jabbering is willful blindness. It is fingers in the ears. It is ignoring immediate reality by indulging in exuberant speculations. No matter the Democrat, the Republicans will smear them as "Socialist" becuase associated with Sanders. McConnell labels the bi-partisan election protection bills "Socialist" as excuse to ignore them. Yes: the vast majority are moderates, who the far-LEFT doesn't like, so they smear them as equivalent of the dirty word "centrist". Lebels, labels, labels; name-calling, name-calling, name-calling; childishness deluding itself that it is politically astute. So busy smearing the middle they haven't time to pay attention in real-time to what the Republicans -- and Barr -- are doing.
1
Because he knows several facts that the know-it-all Sanders "fans" ignore: 1. With Republican gerrymandering, Republican voter-prugings, and Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. 2. The vast majority is moderate. Centrist. 3. Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Period. Full stop.
1
Seder: you weren't even a spark in your fathers eye while Carville was winning elections. And not talking about being Socialist WILL NOT stop the Republicans from calling Democrats Socialist. Sanders appeals to a specific crowd -- not to the broad electorate: young political know-it-all newbies. Carville's mistake was getting Bill Blinton elected twice. Medicare for All is "incredibly popular" with those with whom it is "incredibly popular". Get it through your inflated self-importance: you are NOT the majority. Yes, there is a center. And the vast majority is centrist. Condescendingly insulting the majority is stupid. Carville is correct. You, Seder, and your fellow know-it-alls, are not going to "direct' anything, except into the far-LEFT ditch. Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And how much did Sanders accomplish by being stubbornly anti-compromise for his twenty-five years in Congress? He was totally ineffective. Sanders would be slapped into dizzy befuddlement by Trump. And Sanders IS NOT going to "refashion" the electorate. Unless, of course, he is the other side of the same coin as Trump: a far-LEFT dictator.
1