Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "MSNBC Guest FUMING Over Bernie Outshining Buttigieg" video.

@marvinthemartian857 You're leaving out Russian subversion of the election, the Comey letter, and Sanders trashing her and the Democratic Party even after he LOST the primary because the majority of Democrats voted for the ACTUAL Democrat.
4
MSNBC didn't conduct the primary, moron. The DNC did not run the primary, moron. EVERY candidate, INCLUDING SANDERS, directly monitors election processes, from beginning to end. So, no, moron: Sanders is not a "victim". In 2016, Sanders "fans" were whining because in some states there are primaries, rather than caucuses Now they are not whining that the problem is caucuses, but instead its the mainstream media. If it isn't a far-LEFT ideological freak-show fulminating pie-in-the-sky speculations and bogus conspiracy theories, then Sanders "fans" will attack -- not because the mainstream media is biased, but becuase they don't like the FACTS being reported. What they WANT is far-LEFT division and domonizing. Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Blowing Iowa out of proportion with stupid conspirabunk based upon not knowing how -- thanks to Sanders misinformation -- elections ACTUALLY work helps Trump. Is that what you want?
3
Persoanl attack noted -- and that's all you have: you aren't sufficiently informed to actually address the issues. Your no differnt tthan the Trump assholes. Ask yourself if this is coincidence: Two partners -- one of them Paul Manafort - worked together to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine. That campaign included computer hacking. The next campaigns those two partners managed were Sanders' and Trump's. Moreover, the Sanders campaign was caught early in the primary hacking the DNC -- and Sanders' campaign manager was forced to resign. Computer hacking is not only corrupion; it is a felony. Computer hacking in order to subvert elections sound familiar to you?
3
@michelewalburn4376 Personal attack noted, and presented as evidence that you have no substance. Sanders and Trump "fans" are identical: criticize the candidate, be attacked -- which is not a defense of the candidate. I personally knew Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin (ever hear of them?) They were assholes -- and I was so far Left I was off the political spectrum altogether. During the 1960s, it was the ALIENATION of the mainstream majority by the far LEFT -- Hoffman, Rubin, the Socialists -- who got NIXON elected. In brief, I've been politically aware and active since 3rd grade -- during the 1950s. When were you born? Smearing Democrats, and making up horseshit conspirabunk out of ignorance and mendacity is corrupt -- and it helps Trump, exactly as Sanders did in 2016. Blowing Iowa out of propoprtion out of ignorance and mendacity is xorrupt -- and helps Trump. Shall we assume that the far-LEFT ACTUALLY wants Trump re-elected?
2
@Richard Butt Sanders and Trump are the two sides of the same coin of demagoguery. And it doesn't surprise that a Sanders "fan" would support tyranny over the rule of law.
2
@benfatai756 The mainstream media has been reporting FACTS you don't like -- like the Sanders' campaign hacking of the DNC early in the primary. And it is typical of Trump/Sanders "fans" to blame the media when they don't like and want to avoid the facts. Next time you open your mouth to smear others you DON'T KNOW of being "corrupt," stop and look in your mirror. Do you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that your childish name-calling is going to earn you friends and Sanders supporters? Are you too stupid to know how stupid you are?
2
Spork Spatula IN FACT various candidates' supporters DID switch camps in order to make one or another candidate viable -- there were INTERVIEWS with some of them. So, no: the media isn't lying; you just don't like the FACTS being reported. Stating these FACTS about Sanders is only "attack" by the corrupt Sanders' "fans" who HATE THESE FACTS: 1. Sanders 2016 campaign manager -- who was forced to resign when the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC -- was a partner of Paul manafort, and both worked in Ukraine to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president. Is it a coincidence that they became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns? 2. During the 2016 primary, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Clinton released 30 years of hers and Bills the day she announced her candidacy. And no one had to ask her to do so. What was Sanders hiding? 3. Sanders, the far-Left "Socialist" voted to PROTECT the gun industry --- which was a top priority of the far-RIGHT ANTI-"Socialist domestic terrorist organization NRA. 4. Only two candidates during the 2016 campaign had "fans" -- which is from ENTERTAINMENT; all others, recognizing that politics is not entertainment, had supporters. Go ahead: call me names for not suffering the corruption of selective amnesia, calling Sanders critics names because you can't defend him against the facts, practiced by Sanders' "fans". FACE REALITY: With Republican gerrymandering -- affirmed by the Supreme Court, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreignpowers to subvert the election, Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. In addition, his "fan" "base" that smears Democrats -- which helps Trump -- and name-calls and insults those who state the facts about Sanders is not a successful means to persuade voters to vote for Sanders. FACE REALITY: Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And Sanders' writings, from when he was in his 30s, about young children and sex would be blasted all over the media. And what about his writings asserting that sex prevents cancer? Are there women stupid enough to fall for that pick-up line? I've been active in politics for more than 60 years. Older people tend to know stuff that young people haven't learned yet. You obviously haven't learned that insulting people and calling them names isn't a way to make friends or win support for your candidate. So you fall for Sanders' Politics of Paranoia -- he's a millionaire with power; he is NOT a "victim" -- and attack anyone who states the facts about Sanders in effort to keep yourself blind to themm. And that, your behavior, is CORRUPT.
2
Sanders is lying about Ronmney by asserting that Romney is a "man of faith". Romney voted "NO" on the Article of Impeachment concerning Obstruction of Congress -- EVEN THOUGH IT IS ONGOING. Christ is said to have said of the wealthy, "Give your money away." Romney is a "deeply religious" "Christian" -- and deeply wealthy, and he isn't giving it away. As for "love they neighbor/enemies," Romney is a predatory capitalist.
2
@waterandafter That isn't how the Iowa caucus works, moron. There are three numbers. Sanders is relying only on the first, not the third. The third is the final, and that has Buttigeig with the edge over Sanders. But go right ahead -- swallow and regurgitate Sanders' lie on the point, and pretend to yourself that telling a lie is acceptable so long as you wash your mouth out afterward with the lie that lying isn't corrupt. Face reality: with Republican gerrymandering -- affirmed by teh Supreme Court -- Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, Democrats need all the votes they can get. But Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. ADD IN, that constantly smearing DEMOCRATS as being "corrupt" -- WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE -- is an INSULT that ALIENATES democrats. AND THAT HELPS TRUMP. But go right ahead -- persist in the childish pretence to being superior to the vast majority of voters, who are moderate/"centrist," which to Sanders and his "fans" are dirty words. And you'll bring Trump down on all of us -- including yourself.
2
@speks36 If Sanders is the nomine, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week. Learn some HISTORY: Since at latest the end of WWII, the US population has been indoctrinated, since earliest childhood, to hate and fear Communism/Socialism. Sanders cannot overcome that fact; and if he is the nominee, you'll see a flood of ads with VIDEO of Sanders PRAISING Communist/Socialist Castro, and PRAISING the Communist/Socialist Sandinistas against the United States. Trump is a clear and present danger RIGHT NOW AND GOING FORWARD. You are swallowing and regurgitating pioe-in-the-sky FANTASIES that are NOT going to happen in the face of the CLEAR AND PRESNT Trump and Republican threat to the Constitution. to the rule of law. This is not a time to smear eveyone else as corrupt as a True Believer in -- take your pick -- Sanders or Trump. Like it or not, the mainstream is the MAJORITY. As are Trump's "fans," you are kissing the ass of a wholly INEFFECTIVE extremist. The MAINSTREAM WILL NOT vote for a Socialist (oh -- he's now a DEMOCRATIC Socialist? why is he using dodgy language?). Now do your usual: attack and smear -- without a shred of evidence -- the Sanders critics -- EXACTLY the sasme as Trump "fans" do. Or learn to THINK, LOOK BEYOND the rhetoric to who and what is behind it. INFORM YOURSELF of the FULL history, notonly that fed you by the far-LEFT. Your faction got NIXON elected. And the origins of the poison now facing us was NIXON.
1
He did win by delegates. That's how the Iowa caucus works. There are three stages -- first the number of votes -- which Sanders calims HE won. The final stage is the DELEGATE count -- which BUTTIGIEG won. What matters, moron, are not the votes but the delegates. In 2016, Sanders and his "fans" wanted EVERY state to be a coaucus. Well, you got your wish in Iowa: now LIVE WITH IT, instead of making up bullshit and divisively smearing others becuase you can't stop whining about HORSESHIT. TRUMP is the issue; Sanders' pie-in-the-sky is RUNNING AWAY FROM THAT into FANTASY.
1
Mainstream media isn't picking a candidate. That's why they are news, but you are not.
1
@GOCRAZY3 "Manufacturing Consent" is nothing new. Moreover, when the consent is to the FACTS, the "manufacturing" is constructive. One can be swallowed by media, one can reject -- and bash it -- altogther, or one can learn to distingusih between reporter and facts, and facts and opinion, and facts and propaganda. Yeah: I know it's "hip" for the naive to mistake cynicism for sophistication, and tus to fall into the trap of knowing it all, which latter is not possible. .
1
@crackaassedcracka I thought you were protesting in DEFENSE of freedom of speech. But -- no: exactly llike the far-RIGHT, you are OPPOSED to the expression of views of which you disapprove. and you call OTHERS "corrupt"!?
1
@c.l.freeman7654 Personal attack noted. Sanders and Trump "fans" are identical: they attack the critic -- which is not a defense of their candidate. It's just plain stupid. And it ALIENATES those you CLAIM to want to PERSUADE. I'm not at all "crying" about criticizing ANY candidates. What I oppose, punk, is the LYING BY AND AGAINST those you ASSHOLES DON'T KNOW, and are too damned stupid to have the sense to know what you're talking about. You're full of shit and bullshit slogans and buzzwords.
1
@Gweezy12 Coincidence that corrupt Paul Manafort and Devne worked together to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, and then, out of nowhere, became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns? No leaps in logic in tht question, child. But let's ask you another relevant question: How do you think the non-Sanders "base" will react to Trump campaign ads with VIDEO of Sanders praising Communist Castro, and Communist Sandinistas against the United States? Believe they'll wait in line for the polls to open so they can vote for the Socialist? Now is not the time to "experiment -- we've already seen what happened with the Ttump experiment, pulled off by the totally politically ignorant.
1
@hexstan179 I don't pick sides on that one -- or on being all caught up in claptrap ideological starightjackets. It isn't either or -- that isn't how REALITY works; it's BOTH far-KLeft and -Right. Peopkle don't adore politicians unless they are FOOLISH -- a central clue for which is their calling themselves "Fans," as if the politician is an entertainment celebrity. Politics is a whole different realm than entertainment. If Sanders "fans" haven't leaned the dangerous mistake of the pot luck politics of electing an extremist to "blow up" -- or "burn down" the system, then they haven't learned the meaning of responsibility of citizenship in a democracy. The cure for one extreme is not to revert to the other extreme; that sort of "politics" is only safely reserved for confinees in rubber rooms.
1
@crackaassedcracka Your anti-American CORRUPTION is showing.
1
Ken Hudson Your CORRUPTION is showing.
1
@calmingwaves3134 In view of the fact that you reject my word, do that research for yourself. If you've not seen the VIDEOS of Sanders raising Communists/Socialists Castro and the Sandinistas, then you don't know your candidate. Isn't the ultimate stupidity to vote for a candidate about whom you are deliberately ignorant?
1
@xiquotic1711 Your CORRUPTION is showing with the childish name-calling. As ever, the wealthy and powerful Saint Sanders is the paranoid victim. Learn how to grow up; then grow up. The Trump Criminal Enterprise is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER -- so let's attack DEMOCRATS.
1
However small the margin in Iowa, Buttigieg edged Sanders. So Sanders is lying. And the largest gain in New Hamshire is by Buttigieg. So Sanders is trying to shout down the facts.
1
Luis Monsanto When were you born? Yesterday? You're a Sanders 'fan" who believes everyone is corrupt -- except Sanders and his "fans". The only way you get away with yourself with that is to ignore your corruption be flatly ignoring the facts, or indulging a false amnesia: Is it a coincidence that the two partners -- one being Paul Manafort -- who elected the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine -- ended up running the campaigns of Sanders and Trump? Were you paying attention, or are you deliberately ignoring the fact that early in the 2016 capaign, the Sanders campaign was caught hacking the DNC -- which forced his Manafort-partner/campaign manager to resign? Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Is it a coincidence that the only two candidates who have "fans" -- which are about ENTERTAINMENT -- instead of supporters -- POLITICs is NOT ENTERTAINMENT; it is LIFE-AND-DEATH -- are Sanders and Trump? If Sanders is the nominee, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week, esepcially when his writings, when in his THIRTIES, about young children and sex are blasted across the media. The far-Left and Sanders were talking the same old-school Socialist rehetoic, and engaging in their political disruptions in the 1960s and into the 1970s. They ALIENATED those we needed to elect McGovern -- the working and middle clases -- who was not far-LEFT. Nixon won 49 states. I was there. Were your PARENTS born yet?
1
That's how cults work: there is only ONE Dear Leader. Everyone else is "corrupt". Wake up: you aren't opposed to corruption; you are opposed to only the "corrutpion" constantly ALLEGED by Sanders. you are all FOR Sanders' corruption.
1