Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Raskin says Cipollone gave "valuable" testimony to Jan. 6 committee" video.

  1. The January 6 Committee should subpoena Clarence and Ginni Thomas to testify under oath -- separately. Let's see how the 6 "Federalist Society" extremists on the Court rule on whether Supreme Court Justices are under, above, or outside the reach of the rule of law. Of subpoena. And whether Thomas recuses from that decision. If the Court is bent on discrediting itself and its authority into irrelevance, then let's help them do that. After all, they don't have a means to enforce their edicts against states that choose to ignore their subversions of the Constitution. Another approach: Andrew Johnson was so hated that the Congress REDUCED the number of Supreme Court seats from 10 to 7 so he couldn't appoint to it. At least 3 of the 6 extremists perjured themselves in order to stead their seats. Reducing the number of seats by 3 would restore the needed balance. That should be easier to do than the uphill battle to expand the Court.
    7
  2. The Republicans are working to destroy the country; the Democrats are working to save it. So let's LIE that the Democrats are as corrupt as the Republicans. Do you really believe YOU are immune to the consequences of your afactual anti-rule of law obliviousness?
    1
  3. The Founders doubtless debated term limits. But they would interfere with the electorate's freedom of choice -- which is why the Republicans made term limits a priority. And they were justified in relying on the ignorance of a significant percentage of the electorate to get away with their plans to subvert the will of the electorate. In contrast, per the Constitution, "We the people" are the gov't. There is only one question of you relevant: Do you VOTE? Or do you indulge in excuses to NOT vote, and thus avoid fulfilling your civic DUTY, all so you can use the additional excuse that they are "all corrupt" to continue to not vote? The ultimate responsibility, ALWAYS, remains with the electorate. Stop shirking your responsibility and then dishonestly pointing your finger away from yourself in order to blame the consequences on someone else. The Republicans are working to destroy the country. The Democrats are trying to save it. So let's be ultra-stupid and attack the Democrats.
    1
  4.  @bryanb3352  Perhaps you can find a way to explain what is "funny" about the current political and legal situation involving corruption of even the Supreme Court. Or should we simply consider you all about results, even if that means destroying YOUR rights in the rush to get there? All in all, you have no response, so you attempt to laugh it off. Clue: following "Griswold," which legalized the use of contraception, "Roe" was based on the right of privacy. The other decisions Clarence Thomas cited as to also be overturned were based on the right of privacy. In sum, ALL those decisions were and are based on the right of privacy, therefore all are targeted for overturning by a simple corrupt means: the DENIAL that there is a right of privacy because the words "right of privacy" doesn't appear in the Constitution. The ELIMINATION of the right of privacy is not decision-specific: it is across the board. So weigh how it feels that YOUR right of privacy has been eliminated. Other words that don't appear in the Constitution: "Individual right to own guns".
    1