Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. Hillary Clinton -- former two-term first lady, Senator, and Secretary of State -- was wholly qualified to be president. Mature grace and excellent speech.
    37
  2. "Solicitation of a Crime" is easy. And the solicitation doesn't have to succeed.
    35
  3. "Presidential documents" applies to ALL presidential documents, not only those classified.
    32
  4. 80 DAYS!? Men get 20 years, no questions asked.
    20
  5. The Buffalo mass murder was committed with an assault rifle. There was a security guard, a retired police officer with training, who had and used a handgun. The additional difference was that the mass murderer was wearing body armor, and the security guard with the handgun is dead.
    12
  6. FORTY PERCENT of the Uvalde city budget is POLICE, and THEY HAD THE TRAINING.
    12
  7. Abrams is a right winger. He shows that on "NewsNation" but fails to call it what it is: BIAS.
    12
  8. There aren't two sides to the issue. It would be a violation of oath and constitutions to enforce an unconstitutional law.
    10
  9.  @ryanreedgibson  "USC. is U.S. Code. The "presidential Documents Act" is in the U.S. Code. And "presidential records" includes everything produced by the president and his office -- including the non-classified. As it has pointed out multiple times: the three statutes cited as being violated on which the probable cause was based, and on which the warrant for search issued, DO NOT require CLASSIFICATION. THE LAW: ALL information generated by a gov't employee, regardless whether classified, is GOV'T PROPERTY. NONE of it belongs to the gov't employee. The same goes for GIFTS given to a president by, as example, a foreign nation: THEY DON'T BELONG TO THE PRESIDENT; they are turned over to the National Archives.
    9
  10. There's a jail in the courthouse. It isn't that long a walk to it.
    8
  11. AG Garland speaks softly but carries big indictments.
    7
  12. The LAW: ALL information generated by gov't employees, whether classified or not, BELONGS TO THE GOV'T. NONE of it belongs to the employee.
    7
  13. "Thouights and prayers" = Let's DO nothing.
    7
  14.  @katieell4084  He BELIEVES it will help with fundraising.
    6
  15. That's because Trump supporters are as morally bankrupt -- corrupt -- as he, but for less money.
    6
  16. Let's be accurate: he paid $750.00 two years in a row. But paid NO taxes on his claimed "billions" for 10 out of 15 years.
    5
  17. If more guns made us safe, Texas would be the safest state in the United States.
    5
  18. I hope the prosecution piles on with video evidence of his arrogant contempt for the rule of law, the Congress and its subpoena, and for this court.
    5
  19. It looks like justice will actually happen in this case.
    5
  20. The IRS made clear several years ago in response to his claim about beinb "audited": a person under audit is not barred rleasing their tax returns. Keep in mind: When Hillary Clinton declared her candidacy, she released 30 YEARS of tax returns. And she didn't have to be ASKED.
    5
  21. Because Trump has never taken "NO!" as an answer, so he continued to act "as if" he were the president. Which means he was violating classification protocols even when he was,
    5
  22.  @researchwilson4473  Trump is probably the biggest tax cheat in the history of the world. And a major drain on his bank account/s is all the lawyers he has on retainer, year after year after year, fighting off those to whom he OWES MONEY. He's the sort of fool to pay a lawyer $50,000 in order NOT to pay a $10,000 debt.
    5
  23. The affidavit won't be unsealed.
    4
  24. Good. That's what men usually get, with no one crying about it.
    4
  25. There was also video of a white couple going into the unsecured new-construction house, looking around, and then leaving. I wonder if the judge allowed that evidence to be admitted.
    4
  26. It's being used under the radar to attack the election.
    4
  27. Facts matter, regardless how much you hate the truth about the domestic terrorism you support.
    4
  28. The context is the distraction from his domestic terrorism.
    4
  29. Thank you for naming the youtuber who is spreading the lie -- that violates youtube's "Terms of Service".
    4
  30. The DA and prosecutors are also legal scholars, and they disagree that there is "no case".
    4
  31. Oversimplification -- and Franklin knew better: he voted to establish the Continental Army, which was about SECURITY.
    3
  32.  @dayers8715  It's his view that he doesn't need to know the law because he never intends to comply with it.
    3
  33. It can't be proven there's a "God". But one has been invented as a place to dump one's individual responsibility.
    3
  34. Actually they o mean something because they are established, with penalties, in LAW.
    3
  35. And there are two other co-EQUAL branches of gov't.
    3
  36. But-but-but Arredondo focused on neutralizing the threat of parents running in to rescue their children.
    3
  37.  @Alfredo-lol  They were TRAINED in the protocol. THEY DIDN'T ACT ACCORDING TO THE PROTOCOL. Because they were "afraid of being shot".
    3
  38. The gallows on the Capitol grounds is evidence of premeditation.
    3
  39. And AG Garland's ancestors originate in Eastern Europe. Not everyone is a bigot.
    3
  40. The Haitians in Springfield have jobs and pay taxes.
    3
  41. As I've long understood it, the LAW defines a small business as one with 30 OR FEWER employees.
    3
  42. Trump and Vance.
    3
  43. "FORMER president" is an honorific, an indication of "status" -- it is NOT an OFFICE or OFFICIAL POSITION. He is an ORDINARY CITIZEN who "used to be" something he is not now.
    2
  44. Another fool with a keyboard -- Yes, one owns one's home. But one pays taxes for gov't services that protect that investment -- such as FIRE DEPARTMENTS, and the streets used by the FIRE DEPARTMENTS. Gad, the inability to connect the OBVIOUS DOTS!
    2
  45. Where are Georgia Republicans on abortion?
    2
  46.  @5thribroarn304  Yes -- and I pointed to YOUR IMMORALITY, and the ADDITIONAL LIE that you are "concerned" with "morality" -- so long, of course, as it is someone else's alleged "lack" of morality, because you certainly can't defend the morality that YOU do not have. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. Adams was a patriot; you are not.
    2
  47. The DOJ filed a motion with the court to unseal the COURT'S copy of the warrant. But AG GARLAND said that TRUMP could release the copy given to TRUMP. The search was made necessary because Trump's WORD cannot be trusted.
    2
  48.  @KatieDidnt-ge2mk  Yeah -- I read about it on youtube, by people with fake screen names, so it must be true.
    2
  49. The NRA's Two Second Amendment Lies The gun industry political front NRA tells two lies about the intent of the Second Amendment. 1. That the Second Amendment protects an "individual" "right" to possess guns. Comparison with the several prior Supreme Court decisions, and the legislative history -- the Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment, which are LEGAL AUTHORITY -- shows that Scalia's "Heller" decision is an outlier. In "Heller" he falsely held that the Amendment protects an individual right -- for which he was excoriated by legal experts across the political spectrum for ignoring this adjudicatory standard: When a conflict over the interpretation of a law cannot be resolved within the text of the law, one reverts to the legislative history of the law -- in this instance Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment. The facts from those Debates: The subject of the Amendment is well regulated Militia, and its purpose to establish a National Defense, relying on that Militia. The Militia is not an individual, and is a public institution, regulated under both Federal and state constitutions and laws; thus the Amendment is irrelevant to the issue of private, individual gun ownership: James Madison is called "the father of the Constitution," and the gun industry/NRA claims that Madison wrote the Second Amendment. If both of those are facts, then the word "people" is consistent in meaning from beginning of the Constitution to the end of the first 10 Amendments. The first three words of the Constitution are "We the people," not, "We the individual". This is the first draft of that which became the Second Amendment, which the gun industry/NRA calls the "Madison" Amendment -- but which it never quotes. [Here I clarify it for the logic-impaired]: "The right of the people [PLURAL] to keep and bear arms [this phrase is the well-regulated Militia, and was drawn from four state constitution Militia Clauses] shall not be infringed; a well armed, and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person [INDIVIDUAL] religiously scrupulous of [AGAINST] bearing arms [in well-regulated Militia] shall be compelled [INVOLUNTARY] to render military service [in well-regulated Militia] in person." Source: Creating the Bill of Rights: The Documentary Record from the First Federal Congress (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, Paperback, 1991), Edited by Helen E Veit, et al., at 12. (This volume is readily available from Amazon.) Note the word "compelled": Militia service was a DUTY -- not a "right". And note the words "people" and "person": if a person -- individual -- claimed "religious" exemption from that DUTY, his case was scrutinized individually. The only "individual" "right" Congress debated was that last clause -- "but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service" -- and it was obviously dropped from the proposed Amendment before it was ratified. Thus the Second Amendment obviously does not protect "individual" ANYTHING. Only by ignoring the legislative history -- Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment, which are LEGAL AUTHORITY -- could Scalia falsely hold that the Amendment protects an "individual" "right". 2. That the purpose of the Amendment was to establish a "right" to "take up arms" against the gov't -- which is refuted by the Constitution itself: Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The Congress shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to . . . SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS. The Founders themselves twice established the precedent on the point: Under the Articles of Confederation, "Shays's" rebellion was suppressed by the state's legitimate well-regulated Militia, and the rebels charged with, tried for, and convicted of, TREASON, and sentenced to death. And under the Constitution, AFTER the Second Amendment was ratified, the "Whiskey" rebellion was suppressed by Federalized Militia, lead by George Washington, and the rebels charged with, tried for, and convicted of, TREASON, and sentenced to death. The Congress, as a co-equal branch of gov't, has the authority and power to overturn Supreme Court decisions. Overturn "Heller". PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT.
    2
  50. The gun industry and its POLITICAL front NRA and lobbyists are not defending "gun rights"; they are defending mass murder.
    2
  51.  @igotufoinformation9636  Is that why the media, which are included in the scope of your "everybody," are excessively focused only on the classified documents?
    2
  52. And he's paying more to the lawyers than he'd ultimately have to pay in taxes. The guy is a dunce. But for him it's the "principle" of the thing: crime MUST pay.
    2
  53. UNIDENTIFIED residents.
    2
  54. The correct term is coMPtroller.
    2
  55.  @MWilsonME  Why should she be freed -- because she's female therefore "oppressed" by actual equality under the law?
    2
  56. "We the people" are the gov't. And we are required to PAY OUR OWN WAY. EVERY right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY. You won't find ANY country on the planet tht doesn't have taxes, unless it has no gov't and is a violent anarchy.
    2
  57. Pence needs to strap on his prosthetic spine and testify to the Committee under oath. He OWES it to "We the people," and he is as important a material witness as Trump himself. But if he won't then subpoena his fake-sanctimonious ass.
    2
  58. The word is FLOUT the law, not "flaunt". So much for Abrams' legal expertise.
    2
  59. The Democrats have two issues for the midterms: choice, and gun control.
    2
  60. Trump's "base" is now split, one side believe he's betrayed them, the other confused. They'll begin eating each other.
    2
  61. That isn't how law works.
    1
  62. TAXES pay for INFRASTRUCTURE, from which citizens and homeowners BENFIT, moron. The Founders were NOT OPPOSED to taxation because -- dunce -- they are necessary to fund gov't functions and services.
    1
  63. Within the past several weeks a 2nd grader was caught with a gun in school. Doubtless a home "self-defense" weapon. And within the last several weeks a man shot and killed his 1-year-old niece with a home "self-defense" weapon.
    1
  64. Who is "Nick Johnson," and what are his "qualifications". KKK and Neo-Nazis and Trump's "Proud Boys" have descended on Springfield. Is "Nick Johnson" one of them? Is that his real name?
    1
  65.  @PavlovsDog-yf1wu  It's all over the national media, and video of his statement is on youtube. DeWine is a REPUBLICAN.
    1
  66. EVERYONE needs to cease bashing the DOJ and Garland, regardless their political party, else they all be mistaken for being Republicans for playing into the political attack on the rule of law. And I've been saying exactly that for months.
    1
  67. The Academy is vulnerable to suit from Chris Rock. If they continue to blame Chris Rock, he should sue against that defamation. And NO: Chris Rock DID NOT tell a joke. He COMPLIMENTED Will Smith's wife by comparing her to a film character who is viewed as a POSITIVE ROLE MODEL.
    1
  68.  @jlsperling1  This isn't about me, jackass; it's about the rule of law, based on the Constitution you PISS on while LYING when you invoke it. This is in the "Declaration of independence" as a grievance against King George III: "He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power." There is no "right" to establish private anti-gov't military organizations. There is no "right" to "take up arms" against the gov't/RULE OF LAW. The ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time, which includes these two Militia Clauses: "Art. I., s. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." "Taking up arms" against the gov't -- based on pseudo-law gibberish and lies -- is INSURRECTION. "Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining the Militia . . . reserving to the States [GOV'TS] the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed BY CONGRESS." Constitutional provisions are implemented by means of STATUTES, in this context MILITA ACTS. The purpose of the Second Amendment, per the Debates of those who WROTE it, was to establish a NATIONAL DEFENSE relying on the well-regulated Militia -- ALWAYS UNDER the control of BOTH US and state constitutions and laws. This is underscored by the Militia Act enacted on May 8, 1792: "An act more effectually to provide for a NATIONAL DEFENCE by establishing an uniform MILITIA throughout the United States." You are not only spewing anti-Americanism; you are your own worst enemy: the rule of law, which you REJECT, secures the very rights you claim to be about defending. You can't BOTH reject the rule of law AND claim its protections. Your cheering on of the fascist right wing has just ELIMINATED the right of privacy. THAT affects YOU.
    1
  69. Thanks to Trump and his consistent criminality Trump is shown to be guilty of at very least OBSTRUCTION, which is a FELONY. He is a "martyr" ONLY with CRIMINALS. Or to those too stupid to KNOW that they are cheering on criminality.
    1
  70. "Thoughts and prays" -- Let's DO nothing" -- makes YOU feel good and is entirely self-centered. It is OBVIOUS that it does nothing more than that.
    1
  71. Not all states allow "citizen's arrest". And the Georgia statute -- which they invoked LATER -- was enacted in 1873 in reaction to Lincoln's "Emancipation Proclamation," as authorizing "slave catching".
    1
  72.  @sakethief9365  I'll explain the fact you racists omit: The illegal guns in Chicago are trafficked in from law-run control Indiana. The illegal guns in New York are trafficked in from lax-gun control Vermont. Nationally a national mayor's organization issued a report years ago with the results of research on the sources of guns used in crimes in all 50 states. It was found that the vast majority of the illegal guns in all 50 states originated in three states in the southeast United States. That would be cured by Federal law interdicting the illegal gun trafficking in defense of STATE RIGHTS. It is also reported the Mexican gangs buy guns and Texas and traffic them back into Mexico.
    1
  73.  @sakethief9365  Nothing to say about the 19 children and two teachers murdered in Texas with guns bought in Texas?
    1
  74. Two older NRA convention attendees said the age should be increased to 25.
    1
  75.  @N17-o2r  Rittenhouse. As examples, the judge restricted the prosecution to characterizing those shot as "rioters, looters, and arsonists" -- even though there was NO EVIDENCE -- either inside or outside court -- that those shot were any of those things. And then his racist musing about "lunch"": "I hope the Asian food doesn't arrive by boat." And then there's Rittenhouse himself: he crossed the state line, with an illegal gun, to go to a city where he had no business, to "protect property" from racially-profiled Black Lives Matter". And what did the abundantly-present law enforcement do about the shooting? Nothing. He was only arrested, days later, back at home in his home state.
    1
  76. It wasn't the Electoral College. It was Russia, SANDERS, Comey, and the media -- and voters who didn't pay attention.
    1
  77. He is more qualified than the 6 "Federalist Society" religioFREAKS appointed by Bushit and Trump. He was a veteran DOJ prosecutor -- see OK City bombing -- and a judge. Coney-Barret's written court opinions would fill a thin pamphlet. White Supremacy is anti-American.
    1
  78. Trump's "Signing Statement" eliminated the oversight so Mnuchin could funnel the money intended for small business -- 30 or fewer employees -- to large business of up to 500 employees. Apparently in addition to some of the "small" business refusing to cheat -- the news has been getting out, so Trump/Mnuchin put on a show of being honest.
    1
  79. Judge Pirro's HUSBAND was PARDONED!? Of what crime had he been convicted?
    1
  80. Women get away with it because they are "oppressed".
    1
  81. They are still lying -- and making admissions -- in their court filings.
    1
  82. Two issues for midterms: choice, and gun control.
    1
  83. Perhaps -- Missouri doesn't have the sense to enact reasonable gun control, let alone understand the legitimacy of taxation. Like Trump they want the bennies while also being tax-cheats and deadbeats.
    1
  84.  @demophys4883  They are stupid before they are brave. They don't know anything factual so believe guns are the "smart" alternative solution to actually knowing what they're talking about.
    1
  85. According to REPUBLICAN TX Gov. Abbott the killer had no record of "mental issues," therefore we should focus on "mental issues". VOTE OUT the Republican charlatans and crackpots.
    1
  86. The "institution" is the GOV'T, dunce. "We the people" are the gov't -- and WE PAY OUR OWN WAY for the EXPENSES of gov't and therefore the security of rule of law. Don't pay your way, deadbeat, and the gov't will properly, in behalf of all those who DO pay their own way, seize assets you have commensurate with the amount in delinquency. For how it works see the judgment against Trump in the New York fraud case. He ripped off the people of New York -- they were in effect paying HIS taxes FOR him without being apprised of that fact. And it is longstanding LAW in New York state that in order to appeal such judgments -- which cannot be discharged in bankruptcy -- one must post a bond that is equal to the judgment + 20 PER CENT. Trump nonetheless attempted to appeal the decision without posting the bond -- he finally admitted that he doesn't have the "billions" he has for years LIED he has -- and the appellate court denied his appeal, then in effect told him -- Why not ask the banks you defrauded for loans to pay the bond? This is how the BANKS were defrauded: IN ADDITION to it being ILLEGAL to file FRAUDULENT financial applications for loans -- Trump's falsely inflated valuations of his properties on such applications got him FAVORABLE interest rates -- which means the banks were DEFRAUDED out of GREATER profits from the interest than were realized by the FAVORABLE interest rates. Wake up: nothing Trump says is true; therefore nothing he says is to be believed. Period. Full stop. End of story.
    1
  87.  frank dreben  In other words, you, a law-illiterate, reject the rule of law in your mistaken belief that the absence of the rule of law -- lawless chaos -- would somehow include personal safety. Clue: there are sneakier and superior bushwackers out there than you delusions about yourself.
    1
  88.  @SibiuLM  Not all channels are "politically affiliated". Facts v. politics. And AG Garland is a study in the implementation of this dictum: "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams.
    1
  89. NOT ONE of the 19 cops in the hallway THOUGHT to exist the school, then go around to the outside windows and shoot the killer from there.
    1
  90. Last week a 2nd grader was caught with a gun at his school. "Self defense" of the home again?
    1
  91. Trump is NOT "the president". And he so besmirched the office that he should not be "comforted" by being characterized as even "FORMER president". He is an ordinary citizen; stop playing into his ego games: he is not what he claims to be.
    1
  92.  @JayTX.  You aren't the only person affected by the services, and therefore not the only person affected by your refusal to accept and act in accordance with the RESPONSIBILITIES of citizenship. Your bogus "argument" has been litigated to death and as ALWAYS LOST. So you don't want the potholes in the streets repaired; everyone else does, and they pay their taxes. And you get the repaired potholes FOR FREE. Or you don't want to pay taxes in support of, as example, the local fire department. So when your house catches fire the fire department doesn't show up and save it. So you lose that asset because you're a freeloading deadbeat. But let's ignore all that in favor of your whining against gov't because you're too stupid to have even the most basic understanding of "community" and "society" and how gov't is structured and functions, and that the first obligation of gov't is to meet the needs of "We the people," which costs MONEY therefore "We the people" PAY OUR OWN WAY through TAXATION, and to protect public health and safety. Gov't is by definition rule of law. When you bash gov't you bash the rule of law. That very rule of law secures and protects the RIGHTS you claim; but every right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY. Here's how the Founders put it in the 1784 New Hampshire constitution: "Part I--The Bill of Rights "Article I. . . . . "III. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to insure the protection of others [AND OF THEMSELVES]". There is no "right" to commit crimes -- including non-payment of taxes.
    1
  93.  @metoonunyabidness1391  To which "services" do you refer in effort to avoid the issue -- phone, utilities? Do you want us to believe that the gov't's responsibility to fund fire departments and law enforcement and repair potholes aren't services?
    1
  94.  @metoonunyabidness1391  TAXES PAY FOR POTHOLE REPAIR! Gee, do you ever THINK!? -- perhaps the potholes aren't repaired because FREERIDING DEADBEATS DON'T PAY THEIR TAXES! Get it through your hallucinations: the FOUNDERS WERE NOT OPPOSED TO TAXATION. They not only KNEW that taxation was necessary to FUND the GOV'TS they founded, they ENACTED TAX LAWS. Idjit: how does ANY gov't fund fire departments, law enforcement, and MILITARY, WITHOUT MONEY!? And where does that MONEY come from!? It comes from TAXATION! Don't pay your taxes, get busted, prosecuted, and cough up the taxes owed, plus interest -- as Hunter Biden did -- or the gov't will seize sufficient of your assets to satisfy the judgment, or seize your ass and put it in jail. And of story. You're talking ignorant gibberish with has nothing to do with reality. It's all being drunk on whine and infuriating oneself with nonsense.
    1
  95. "Privateer" is either too stupid or too selfish to realize that he is part of a community, a scoiety, and he benefits from that even though all he is a freeriding deadbeat taker.
    1
  96.  @scarecrow_9895  "Privateer" doesn't like the word "equity" because he associates it with the word "'equality," and he is opposed to equality before the law for everyone.
    1
  97.  @sherril.562  If she owed taxes she should have paid them. And if she owed them and didn't pay them, the gov't has every authority to collect the taxes in whatever way it can. I'm beyond fed up with you terminally stupid sociopaths who confuse selfishness for "freedom": the Founders were not anti-gov't -- gov't is by definition rule of law -- they FOUNDED gov'ts. But tell us, terminally stupid: where on earth is there a country that doesn't have taxation? Why is your fantasy not actually achievable anywhere?
    1
  98.  @darksoulquis5643  It can't be proven there's ANY "God".
    1
  99. Yet again no-show "God" didn't PREVENT murder.
    1
  100.  @reality_design  Stop the paranoid nonsense. The "Bible" stories were reported/written by illiterates.
    1
  101.  @ratscats9456  How about getting your head out of the self-satisfied fantasies and WORKING for gun control?
    1
  102.  @bradr2142  "God" is a no-show. How about HUMANS get off their knees and TAKE RESPONSIBILITY.
    1
  103.  @bradr2142  And haven't done anything to PREVENT the violence either -- for which fact you are responsible.
    1
  104.  @ratscats9456  So let's give the criminals even more guns, then?
    1
  105.  @deepaklevin  There are those who are offended by the truth.
    1
  106.  @Di316-v6w  You aren't a real American, because real Americans comply with the entire Constitution, not only the parts of it they like. It is domestic terrorism as a matter of law, law-illiterate anti-American.
    1
  107.  @darksoulquis5643  You and your "freind" would bushwack each other at the drop of a hat.
    1
  108.  @theblade9024  Guns don't kill people; bullets kill people. And one fact is common to all guns: they shoot bullets. And they shoot bullets when persons pull the trigger. Persons with guns kill people with guns.
    1
  109. The poll numbers add up to 113 per cent of those polled. Apparently some who are watching are claiming their minds aren't changed. They are lying on that.
    1
  110. Chris Rock DID NOT say Will Smith shouldn't be removed. He said he wasn't pressing charges -- which is not the same thing. Will Smith's "apology" was written by his publicist -- and was filled with excuses and justifications.
    1
  111.  @5thribroarn304  Gotta "love" the Republican tradition of political smear WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE. And you want us to believe that your "questioning" of others "morals isn't based on the fake "morality" that is the IMMORALITY of LYING.
    1
  112. The CDC was under Trump at the time.
    1
  113.  @kevinjenner9502  What are you talking about? The DOCUMENTS belong to the American people but are held by proxy by the gov't. Take your off-topic conspiracy "theories" to somewhere appropriate.
    1
  114. Trump wants to know what's in the affidavit but does not want the PUBLIC to know. That's why he isn't in court arguing for it being unsealed. And, of course, as long as it remains sealed he will spew all sorts of disinformation against the rule of law.
    1
  115. The Academy is trying to avoid responsibility by blaming Chris Rock -- thus only digging the self-inflicted hole deeper.
    1
  116. Clarence Thomas is ignoring the Founders' cun control, which included confiscation and prohibition.
    1
  117. Do you know anything but personal attacks, pretending you are a sophisticated elementary schooler, when in fact you were expelled from pre-school for refusing to potty-train.
    1
  118. ABC: report the FACTS against the anti-Americanism.
    1
  119. Instead of debating abortion all these decades, women should have been responding to the opponents of it by educating us all about problem pregnancies.
    1
  120. "He don’t understand that every president has taken documents back". EVIDENCE? Yep -- you have NONE. Because that is false. This is your basic argument: One murderer got away with it, so no other murderers should be prosecuted.
    1
  121. Only about half of the affidavit is redacted. You should READ it instead of making an uninformed comment.
    1
  122.  @chasinglighttoo  "No Collusion"? Trump's July 27, 2016 Solicitation of Crime with Russia. This is Webster's definition of "collusion": "Secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose". How many Trumpeters lied about their contacts with Russians during the Trump-Putin COLLUSION? THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: We have Trump on video, in broad daylight, soliciting Russia: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." To "find" those emails required computer hacking. Computer hacking is a felony. In fact, he solicited a series of felonies, beginning with computer hacking and stealing private property, through to receiving and possessing that stolen property. And we know that on the same day as Trump's solicitation, within hours thereafter, Russia hacked computers and stole the emails. That made Trump a co-conspirator with Russia. That conspiracy is an additional felony. ____________ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT. ___ That also applies to Trump's solicitation of election fraud phone calls to Georgia election officials.
    1
  123. They're used to acting as white supremacist vigilantes and not having to lie about it. So here we have a man being, unused to sustained lying, putting the rope around his own neck.
    1
  124. The NRA BANS guns at its headquarters and conferences.
    1
  125. YES! Her speech brings me to tears for what we've LOST.
    1
  126. Trump CLAIMS he wants the affidavit unsealed, but he isn't in court arguing for that. He wants to know what's in it, but he doesn't want the PUBLIC to know.
    1
  127.  @PavlovsDog-yf1wu  "Google" Ohio Governor DeWine. You'll also find video of his statement on youtube.
    1
  128. That isn't the law. But it is your RACISM.
    1
  129.  @ShinyShuckle-j1r  REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Haitians in Springfield -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jZAJoLPLY
    1
  130. Have you VETTED those UNNAMED "local residents" to determine whether they are TRUTHFUL? If DeWine has an alleged "longstanding connection to Haiti," then DeWine has credibility YOU DO NOT have. NONE of what you are MAKING UP has ANY evidentiary value because unnamed anybodys can say -- or can be SAID to have said -- anything. NONE of that proves they even EXIST. One more comment pushing the RACIST LIE, and I report your for VIOLATING youtube's "Terms of Service".
    1
  131. Massachusetts lead the so-called "revolution" -- and banned guns within Boston.
    1
  132. If you were INFORMED of the FACTS you would have learned that there is a damage assessment ongoing. That begins with discovering which documents are MISSING, because they are all cataloged. But stick with your exclusive "Jesus is Love" as if no one else has been or is. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. And SEPARATE from "religion".
    1
  133. At least HUNDREDS have been saying for DECADES that the 1 per cent doesn't pay its fair share. Remember the 2016 campaign, when Sanders stood shoulder to shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing HIS tax returns -- but never did? Instead he smeared Clinton, and trashed the Democratic Party, with Right-Wing lies, and helped elect TRUMP. Wake up: Sanders is as much a fraudulent cult leader as Trump. The only "difference" is that he's from the opposite extreme. The "polarization" is because of the extremes attacking the moderates -- the moderates being the MAJORITY.
    1
  134. When Kemp first ran for governor he was the Sec. of State, thus controlled the election -- which is a conflict of interest. That included, during the campaign, his purging of the voter rolls of minority and Democratic voters.
    1
  135.  @igotufoinformation9636  Not at all. Not all presidential documents are classified; and those not classified are not necessarily public. Why would, as example, Obama's letter to Trump be classified -- there is no way it would reveal classified information. But let's go to the bottom line: Trump FALSELY alleged that President Obama "took" 33 million documents when he left office. IN FACT, all of Obama's documents were turned over to the National Archives (NARA). Any access to those documents -- limited of course to non-classified -- by Obama himself would be subject to the protocols established by NARA. The possession and control of ALL presidential records, even those accessible to scholars at presidential libraries, is with NARA. NO president can have that GOV'T property in his possession, even if not classified. Because presidential records are the United States' HISTORY of presidencies. A president -- including the present president -- no more owns the presidential documents produced during his presidency than he owns the presidency itself.
    1
  136.  @igotufoinformation9636  No, because "presidential documents" are not limited to the classified. In fact, it's probable that the classified are a small percentage of the total number of presidential documents of any given president.
    1
  137.  @igotufoinformation9636  Of course Obama's letter to Trump falls under the "Presidential Records Act". I need to learn about it? I have an education in law, have extensive experience working on gov't documents law and issues, and you are a law-illiterate who defends New York con-man and career criminal Trump and his assault on the RULE OF LAW. AGAIN: ALL information generated by gov't employees -- the president is an EMPLOYEE, NOT "the BOSS" -- is GOV'T property. The employee owns NONE of it. Our gov't consists of three co-EQUAL branches: the president is not above the other two. The Impeachment Clause, in the Constitution, applies to criminal presidents. The Constitution is the SUPREME Law of the Land, and Trump IS NOT above the law. OBVIOUSLY, Obama's letter to Trump, written by President Obama, is a PRESIDENTIAL RECORD.
    1
  138.  @igotufoinformation9636  Actually the investigation is not focused on classified documents -- that is the media's distortion. It has been repeatedly reported, by more responsible media, that the three statutes Trump is alleged to have violated have NOTHING to do with the classification status of the documents. The investigation is focused on retrieving STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY -- presidential records, SOME of which are classified. Investigating what was done with the classified records is a separate or additional investigation.
    1
  139.  @igotufoinformation9636  The gov't "is conducting a criminal investigation concerning . . . the unlawful concealment or removal of government records." AGAIN: "government records" are not limited to classified information. IN FACT, after the first 15 boxes were returned, and their contents cataloged by NARA, they noticed that the Obama and Kim Jong-Un letters were missing. That is why the suspicion that Trump had more presidential records. So NARA referred the matter to DOJ: THEFT of GOV'T PROPERTY, regardless classification status, is a CRIME. The same applies to GIFTS to presidents by, as example, a foreign nation: they GO TO NARA BECAUSE GOV'T PROPERTY. Among the three statutes cited as being violated is the "Presidential Records Act". That statute came about after Nixon sued to keep his tapes as "personal documents". He LOST because they were generated by him as a gov't employee and concerned presidential matters.
    1
  140.  @igotufoinformation9636  Yes, jackass, because not all GOV'T PROPERTY is CLASSIFIED.
    1
  141.  @igotufoinformation9636  If a president writes a letter to a private citizen, that letter is a presidential document, therefore it is GOV'T PROPERTY.
    1
  142.  @igotufoinformation9636  RULE OF LAW. The three statutes cited as violated have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CLASSIFICATION STATUS OF THE DOCUMENTS. They have to do with the FACT that ALL the documents, INCLUDING THE NON-classified, are GOV'T PROPERTY.
    1
  143.  @igotufoinformation9636  THE WARRANT COVER SHEET, troll.
    1
  144.  @igotufoinformation9636  _Trump's Solicitation of Crimes from Georgia Election Officials_: THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: 1. Sixty-Seven Minute Taped Conversation with Trump, Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger, and Others. 2. Taped Conversation with Trump and Georgia Elections Investigator Frances Watson. ___ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT
    1
  145. They're just being assholes, which is their singular skill.
    1
  146. If not for Russia, SANDERS, Comey, and the media. If you'll remember: Sanders promised to destroy the DEMOCRATIC Party. But which party turned out to be the threat to the Constitution? Sanders helped elect TRUMP -- and there went the Supreme Court and Roe.
    1
  147.  @gypsy7818  She's a LIAR: the search warrant has her SIGNATURE as the RECIPIENT of it. Get it straight: just like all other Trump lawyers, they LIE to the PUBLIC. Rudy "TRUTH ISN'T TRUTH!" -- is that a truth? -- Giuliani told all sorts of stories to the PUBLIC, but IN COURT ADMITTED that he had no evidence to support the bogus "election theft" LIE. And he said to a REPUBLICAN who testified to the January 6 Committee that Rudy said to him: "We have lots of theories, but no evidence." See that word "EVIDENCE"? More than 60 cases filed by Trump lawyers were LAUGHED OUT OF COURT for LACK OF EVIDENCE.
    1
  148. The video was enough evidence to execute the arrest of Will Smith.
    1
  149. Racists will say what you want to hear. But you don't IDENTIFY any of those fictional "Several residents".
    1
  150. NOTHING from the Uvalde police or gov't is to be trusted. They assertion that there was a 'negotiator" who tried to "negotiate" with the killer is just another red herring/excuse for not going in. All the Texas system is doing, from Abbott on down, through the REPUBLICAN mayor of Uvalde, and DA and police, are LYING by COVERING-UP to protect EVERYONE BUT public safety.
    1
  151. Trump always hired illegal aliens because he could pay them less than union wages.
    1
  152. They are 100 per cent legal. They work and pay taxes.
    1
  153. REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Springfield Haitians -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDX7y9HvpnA
    1
  154. REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Haitians in Springfield -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jZAJoLPLY
    1
  155. The NRA's Two Second Amendment Lies The gun industry political front NRA tells two lies about the intent of the Second Amendment. 1. That the Second Amendment protects an "individual" "right" to possess guns. Comparison with the several prior Supreme Court decisions, and the legislative history -- the Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment, which are LEGAL AUTHORITY -- shows that Scalia's "Heller" decision is an outlier. In "Heller" he falsely held that the Amendment protects an individual right -- for which he was excoriated by legal experts across the political spectrum for ignoring this adjudicatory standard: When a conflict over the interpretation of a law cannot be resolved within the text of the law, one reverts to the legislative history of the law -- in this instance Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment. The facts from those Debates: The subject of the Amendment is well regulated Militia, and its purpose to establish a National Defense, relying on that Militia. The Militia is not an individual, and is a public institution, regulated under both Federal and state constitutions and laws; thus the Amendment is irrelevant to the issue of private, individual gun ownership: James Madison is called "the father of the Constitution," and the gun industry/NRA claims that Madison wrote the Second Amendment. If both of those are facts, then the word "people" is consistent in meaning from beginning of the Constitution to the end of the first 10 Amendments. The first three words of the Constitution are "We the people," not, "We the individual". This is the first draft of that which became the Second Amendment, which the gun industry/NRA calls the "Madison" Amendment -- but which it never quotes. [Here I clarify it for the logic-impaired]: "The right of the people [PLURAL] to keep and bear arms [this phrase is the well-regulated Militia, and was drawn from four state constitution Militia Clauses] shall not be infringed; a well armed, and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person [INDIVIDUAL] religiously scrupulous of [AGAINST] bearing arms [in well-regulated Militia] shall be compelled [INVOLUNTARY] to render military service [in well-regulated Militia] in person." Source: Creating the Bill of Rights: The Documentary Record from the First Federal Congress (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, Paperback, 1991), Edited by Helen E Veit, et al., at 12. (This volume is readily available from Amazon.) Note the word "compelled": Militia service was a DUTY -- not a "right". And note the words "people" and "person": if a person -- individual -- claimed "religious" exemption from that DUTY, his case was scrutinized individually. The only "individual" "right" Congress debated was that last clause -- "but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service" -- and it was obviously dropped from the proposed Amendment before it was ratified. Thus the Second Amendment obviously does not protect "individual" ANYTHING. Only by ignoring the legislative history -- Congress' Debates of the writing of the Amendment, which are LEGAL AUTHORITY -- could Scalia falsely hold that the Amendment protects an "individual" "right". 2. That the purpose of the Amendment was to establish a "right" to "take up arms" against the gov't -- which is refuted by the Constitution itself: Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The Congress shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to . . . SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS. The Founders themselves twice established the precedent on the point: Under the Articles of Confederation, "Shays's" rebellion was suppressed by the state's legitimate well-regulated Militia, and the rebels charged with, tried for, and convicted of, TREASON, and sentenced to death. And under the Constitution, AFTER the Second Amendment was ratified, the "Whiskey" rebellion was suppressed by Federalized Militia, lead by George Washington, and the rebels charged with, tried for, and convicted of, TREASON, and sentenced to death. The Congress, as a co-equal branch of gov't, has the authority and power to overturn Supreme Court decisions. Overturn "Heller". PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT.
    1
  156. The Founders engaged in every degree of gun control, including confiscation of all weapons possessed by those who refused to swear the oath of loyalty to the Cause. Laws the NRA opposes, based upon lies against the legal history and the Second Amendment, have existed since the 1600s.
    1
  157. The Trump campaign is domestic terrorism.
    1
  158.  @pnorris1982  Inciting violence against others, as Trump and Vance are doing to the Haitians in Ohio,, is terrorism. The result has been according to REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine, 33 bomb threats. It also violates youtube's "Terms of Service". Bomb threats are intended to terrorize -- and they are ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL. Tell us why you defend that crime.
    1
  159.  @d3c0y39  Mass murders are domestic terrorism. 99 per cent of mass shootings, the weapon of choice being AR-15 ASSAULT weapons, have been committed by RIGHT-wing white males. You are either a dumbass as concerns actual facts, or you are a liar. The January 6th insurrection was domestic terrorism, and was planned, organized, and directed by REPUBLICAN Trump, and those who directly attacked the Capitol, and those outside and directing, were all RIGHT-wing extremists claiming to be "conservatives" Those terrorizing the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, are domestic terrorists, and they are being incited to that criminality by Trump and Vance and other REPUBLICANS.
    1
  160. They called 911 after the killing.
    1
  161. You have it wrong. They are calling attention to the facts they are about to report. It isn't condescending; rather, you don't like the facts being reported, or that it is a struggle for you to attempt to pretend you didn't hear them.
    1
  162. @choof There are two or three people on camera reporting the news. They take turns. Person A gives a report, then person B calls attention to a different angle on person A's report, or to an entirely different topic. It isn't condescension. It is no different than in writing one sets out different subject matter in separate paragraphs. And chapters. So I recommend not reading books as you'll be "offended" by the author providing ques on how to follow what is being written.
    1
  163.  @gypsy7818  Seriously, Trumper: Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T. That is LAW going back to the first Supreme Court decision, in the 18th century, on the question.
    1
  164.  @kahlesjf  It's simply a way of calling attention to a different view, or specific facts. It is stunning that a viewer would FEEL condescended to by a talking head who doesn't know the viewer exists. It is a mannerism, and nothing more. But apparently those who FEEL it is condescending have only encountered it in the context of argument and felt inadequate against the other's view. Is it "condescending" when opposing counsel in litigation, in court, follows up on the lawyer who omits facts with, "But, your honor, I call attention to X"? Of course not. Condescension is in an overall attitude, not in a pause-for-thought drawing of attention to specifics. alternatives, or additional information. If you're talking about Trump lawyers Bobb or Habba, it is baseless arrogance by individuals who are out of their league but believe bullshitting is legitimate substitute for sound argument. All in all, if one is objecting to the FACTS being reported, so attacks the reporter, then that is both petty and dishonest: the problem isn't the facts; the problem is with the person who doesn't like the facts.
    1
  165. It's okay to speak with an accent, but not to hear with one.
    1
  166. They are putting the responsibility on Chris Rock for not doing as the LAW and Academy rules REQUIRED the Academy do. And it was Will Smith who got the "condolences" -- but none for Chris Rock.
    1
  167.  @youtubesucks1499  There is no "defunding" of the police, dunce. And in this instance the POLICE -- 40 per cent of the entire Uvalde city budget is POLICE -- FAILED. NO ONE is saying that social workers would have handled it better -- the shooting had already STARTED. Those who push your LIE are RACISTS. And THAT is anti-American.
    1
  168. Trump has no rights in this case. It's a simple case: He STOLE GOV'T PROPERTY.
    1
  169. When Bannon said he'd testify to the Committee, the Committe responded: "Turn over the subpoenaed documents, and then we'll consider having you testify."
    1
  170.  @mballer  Too bad body armor is in the possession of private citizens. There is no excuse for that. "More guns" wouldn't have made a difference against the body armor. And as the evidence is overwhelming, more guns equals more gun violence and death.
    1
  171. The same games as are be played all over the world. The rest of the world doesn't have a GUN problem.
    1
  172.  @willmont8258  AGAIN: I have an education in law; you are law-illiterate. AND AGAIN: 1. The DEBATES of the Congress -- both House AND Senate -- that WROTE the Second Amendment prove that the PURPOSE of the Second Amendment was to establish a NATIONAL DEFENSE relying on the MILITIA. That fact is underscored by the May 8, 1792 Militia Act enacted by CONGRESS: "An act more effectually to provide for the NATIONAL DEFENSE by establishing an uniform MILITIA throughout the United States." 2. Through the several drafts of that which became the Second Amendment there was ONLY ONE "individual right" debated. It read as follows: ": but no person [INDIVIDUAL] religiously scrupulous of [AGAINST] bearing arms, shall be compelled [INVOLUNTARY] to render military service [in well-regulated militia] in person." O-B-V-I-O-U-S-L-Y, MORON, that was VOTED DOWN BEFORE the Amendment was ratified. 3. FURTHER, the 6 "Federalist Society" Supreme Court FANATICS overturned "Roe," which was based on the right of privacy, by DENYING that there is a right of privacy BECAUSE the words "right of privacy" don't appear in the Constitution. OTHER words that don't appear in the Constitution: "Individual right to possess guns". 4. AND AGAIN: the United States consists of two levels or forms of gov't: Federal, and states. That means that every citizen has DUAL citizenship: citizenship in the United States; and citizenship in their state of residence. And the term "states' rights" is nothing new as a term, because that is precisely as the 6 SC FANATICS did with "Roe": kicked the decision back to the states so each state can decide whether it citizens will LOSE that right or KEEP it as a STATE RIGHT. You should embrace the "states' rights" formulation because it has always been tainted by white supremacists in their effort to avoid FEDERAL protections of citizens, under the SUPREMACY Clause, from STATE gov't oppression of its citizens by yelling "STATES' RIGHTS!"
    1
  173.  @willmont8258  Tell us, punk, how there is NO right of privacy because the words "right of privacy" don't appear in the Constitution, but there "is" an individual right to possess guns even though the words "individual right to possess guns" don't appear in the Constitution. You can't have it both ways, law-illiterate crackpot.
    1
  174. ALL information generated by gov't employees is the property of the GOV'T. Whether it is classified or not is IRRELEVANT. That some of that STOLEN by Trump is classified is addressed by other statutes.
    1
  175. Dept relief is only to be granted to Republicans and their billionaire donors.
    1
  176. @trumpist Gaetz got a PPP loan. That loan forgiven was more than $400,000 dollars. Marjorie Taylor Green's PPP loan forgiven was more than $100,000. Other Republicans had PPP loans for more than one million -- one was more than 3 million -- that were forgiven. You don't get away with being a fact-free moron who spews hogwash/lies. Did you OBJECT to the Socialism for the Rich Trump tax cut -- from which HE benefitted -- that created a DEBT of more than 1 TRILLION dollars? Of course not: because you got NOTHING from it except reinforcement of your self-deceiving and self-destructive STUPIDITY.
    1
  177. Racist Nazi.
    1
  178. The majoirty obviously ignore the Debates of the WRITING of the Second Amendment, and the legal history.
    1
  179. _Trump's Solicitation of Crimes from Georgia Election Officials_: THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: 1. Sixty-Seven Minute Taped Conversation with Trump, Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger, and Others. 2. Taped Conversation with Trump and Georgia Elections Investigator Frances Watson. ___ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT
    1
  180. Not all media fail to report that Trump hasn't the authority to invoke or waive executive privilege. And not all media fail to report that Bannon doesn't have executive privilege. And not all media fail to report that the decision as to whether Bannon testifies is the Committee's to make, not Bannon's.
    1
  181. The mayor of Uvalde is a REPUBLICAN. He is part of the COVER-UP. The first obligation of gov't is to protect public health and safety. But, from Gov. Abbot on down, they are protecting THEMSELVES, NOT public safety. They are not defending gun rights; they are defending mass murder.
    1
  182. The door was ALLEGEDLY propped open by a teacher -- as ALLEGED by REPUBLICANS have been smearing teachers for at least MONTHS.
    1
  183. BOT.
    1
  184. Three white guys chase a Black guy in Georgia -- Black guy, knowing history, is terrified.
    1
  185. Not all media do that. Most legitimate media report the facts: only the sitting president has the authority to invoke or waive executive privilege. And it isn't absolute: there is that crime-fraud exception.
    1
  186. Go ahead -- call the "Trump Organization" a criminal enterprise, because it's been that for three generations.
    1
  187. Hopefully the police failure will be the disaster that makes the changes necessary.
    1
  188. You know how to defend yourself? GUN CONTROL. We have a right to NOT be murdered because REPUBLICAN politicians are OWNED by the gun industry and its POLITICAL front NRA and lobbyists.
    1
  189.  @ak471911able  Abbott eliminated background checks, thus making it legal for criminals to buy guns legally. You aren't defending gun rights; you're defending mass murder.
    1
  190.  @ak471911able  This is in the Constitution -- ALL of which is in effect at the same time -- YOU HAVE NOT READ: Per the Constitution, "We the people" are the gov't. You hatred of "We the people" is SELF-destructive. THIS is in the Constitution: "Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia[/National Guard] to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." As is THIS: "Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia . . . reserving to the States [GOV'TS] respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed BY CONGRESS." The ONLY "individual right" DEBATED by those who WROTE the Second Amendment was this: "but no person [INDIVIDUAL] religiously scrupulous of [AGAINST] bearing arms [in well-regulated Militia] shall be compelled [INVOLUNTARY] to render military service [in well-regulated Militia]". That was obviously VOTED DOWN before the proposed Amendment was submitted to the states for consideration and ratification. The SUBJECT of the Amendment is WELL-REGULATED MILITIA. A Militia is not an individual, is a public organization, and is an arm OF gov't.
    1
  191. The Committee hasn't the authority to "retract" the charges: separation of powers.
    1
  192. The radicals on the Supreme Court are empowering far-right insurrectionists.
    1
  193. According to his lawyer Trump was watching via the MAGA-Lardo CCTV system while he was in New York. But the FBI has that covered: these forensic search and seizure are documented in writing, and with photographs and video.
    1
  194. REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Haitians in Springfield -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jZAJoLPLY
    1
  195. I'll bet "christinao" claims to be a "Christian".
    1
  196. Yo, RACIST: the ISSUE is lack of gun control.
    1
  197.  @Vgt547  Gad, the ignorance of basic law and the racism is a STENCH on the rule of law. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams.
    1
  198.  @flatcat6676  You're a freeriding deadbeat.
    1
  199.  @FadeNowitZki  Everything he said that pointed away from the fact that he -- and the Trump-Vance campaign -- are deliberately inciting racist violence as domestic terrorists. It is not, as example, the Democrats who assert the debunked lie that is inciting the violence against the LEGAL immigrants in Springfield, Ohio.
    1
  200. When will the Republicans in the Senate finally approve the ATF director nominee?
    1
  201. Abbott made it legal for criminals to buy guns legally
    1
  202. False: the Committee has the final say on that, and it hasn't yet made that decision. Recognizing that Trump -- he is paying Bannon's lawyers -- doesn't have the authority to invoke of waive executive privilege, exactly as the Trump Supreme Court has ruled. And recognizing that Bannon doesn't have the cover of executive privilege -- the DOJ said his PLOY is "irrelevant": he has been indicted for contempt of Congress, and that won't change by anything Bannon does. Bannon blew off the Committee, and that he is a known self-promoter an liar, the Committee should ignore him.
    1
  203. Because all that fruit-fringe nonsense is nonsense.
    1
  204. Weisselberg kept the two sets of books. Exposing the workings of the Trump criminal enterprise will expose Trump; Trump always claims to be the BOSS in charge, then when targeted he whines that he's a "victim".
    1
  205. KKK and Neo-Nazis.
    1
  206. Yeah -- unidentified "random residents" of unknown veracity. In contrast, the Springfield Mayor of Springfield, the Springfield police, the Ohio Attorney General, and REPUBLICAN Governor DeWine, ALL say the claim is A LIE.
    1
  207.  @financeroyce474  REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Haitians in Springfield -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jZAJoLPLY
    1
  208. Trump STOLE gov't property, some of which is classified. Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T.
    1
  209.  @joevelte4252  This is the LAW on this issue: Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T. That has been the law since the first Supreme Court ruling on the question in the 18th century. Let's be more particular by presenting the FACTS, oblivious and duped Trumpeter: 1. Several of Trump's WHITE HOUSE lawyers have testified under oath that Trump said of the STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY, "It's mine, it's not theirs." 2. Because Trump refused to cooperate by handing over the GOV'T PROPERTY he STOLE to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), NARA referred the issue to DOJ. 3. After the first 15 boxes were retrieved, and the DOJ and FBI learned that those were not all of the GOV'T PROPERTY Trump STOLE and was ILLEGALLY WITHHOLDING, the DOJ and FBI bent over backwards in effort to cooperate in the retrieval of the rest of the STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY. Trump instead engaged in what he called "negotiation" over the issue. Does law enforcement cooperate with a bank robber who wants to "negotiate" over "whether," "how much," and "when" the robber will return the stolen money? 4. Trump denied having additional STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY so the DOJ/FBI subpoenaed the remainder. Trump provided a few -- proving that his claim to have no mare was FALSE -- and at least one of his lawyers signed a declaration attesting to the "fact" that there were no more STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY to turn over. 5. Finally, because Trump TALKED about "cooperating" but did not do so, the DOJ/FBI got a warrant for search and retrieved even more boxes of STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY, in total to date more than two dozen. It wouldn't have been an issue if Trump had simply turned over all the documents at the outset. Instead, the PAPER TRAIL of the effort documents Trump LYING, and blowing off a subpoena. And then his lawyer BOBB publicly stated that she was kept from the premises and didn't receive the warrant. IN FACT, as the unsealed warrant/inventory show, BOBB SIGNED the warrant/affidavit as the RECIPIENT of them. Trump has NEVER accepted "NO!" even when the "NO!" is the LAW. So you are arrogantly and stupidly defending CRIME. Question: Is TRUMP above the law?
    1
  210.  @joevelte4252  The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) smacked down Trump's BULLSHIT on the issue with an explanation of how presidential records -- see Presidential Records Act -- are handled, and how, separately, classified information is handled. That statement smacking down Trump's whiney BULLSHIT was reported by all CREDIBLE media: The NARA maintains control of and administers the presidential records of ALL modern presidencies, including those accessible through presidential libraries. That includes the 33 million Obama presidential records. Obama complied with the Presidential Records Act by turning over ALL those records to NARA, and NARA in cataloging them sent the non-classified to a NARA facility in the Chicago area -- those being accessible to patrons of the Obama Presidential Library -- and all classified information to a facility in the Washington, D.C. area. Thus NARA maintains control over the non-classified records, AND the classified -- and NO ONE outside those in gov't having security clearances and need to know has access to the classified. NONE of that is controversial or rocket science or a new practice. Only Trumpeters don't know that Trump is a CONSTANT LIAR because they WANT to believe his lies. And they -- as do you -- avoid all sources of information that AREN'T propagandists for Trump by perpetuating his lies. So Obama isn't actually the issue -- which is why Trump is LYING about it. THIS is the issue: Is TRUMP above the law?
    1
  211.  @joevelte4252  Want to know how TRUMP was required to follow the letter of the law? READ the Presidential Records Act. He IGNORED that LAW.
    1
  212. Hillary Clinton was correct about Trump. Fools fell for the spin and lying, and their refusal to focus on facts and reality, and we lost the vision of Hillary Clinton. We've been driven back YEARS thanks to the fools. They dug us into a hole we must now struggle to climb out of.
    1
  213. Trump STOLE GOV'T PROPERTY, SOME of which is classified.
    1
  214.  @kimwisby2662  Still walking around with your head up your ass, eh? Trump is a New York con-man and career criminal. This time he has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. And you support selling out national security -- the safety not only of the country but of your own. Your profession is self-destructive stupidity.
    1
  215.  @tfox6919  And, of course, lacking any EVIDENCE for that smear, you instead LIE.
    1
  216.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  Where is your EVIDENCE, anti-American troll?
    1
  217.  @hanadiyousef9005  Pence decent!? He OWES his testimony in defense of the Constitution. Instead he's putting his political ambition ahead of the rule of law. Exactly as he puts his "God" above the Constitution and the SEPARATION OF "RELIGION AND STATE" in it. He's as phony as a three dollar bill.
    1
  218.  @calvinthestormfreak  Literacy isn't your forte.
    1
  219. Trump has always been about "NO!" against even the rule of law. He is a New York con-man and career criminal.
    1
  220.  @user-qr7ee2cp4y  Kevin McCarthy said, ON CAMERA, that the purpose of the Benghazi "investigation" was to "lower [Hillary Clinton's poll] numbers" on the assumption she would run for president. Subsequently, during the campaign, the Russians hacked the DNC -- NOT Hillary Clinton, so the "but her emails" were not her emails. But you bought into the DECADES of REPUBLICAN-invented fake "scandals" against the Clinton's, which the REPUBLICANS then demanded be "investigated," which the REPUBLICANS then "investigated," and found exactly that the REPUBLICANS knew all along: that there was no "there" there. Because you were too lazy to see through that constant bullshit.
    1
  221. REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor DeWine refuting the lies against the Haitians in Springfield -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jZAJoLPLY
    1
  222. The Republican Party has since at latest Reagan been wearing a mask to obscure its white supremacism. The only difference is that Trump tore the mask off.
    1