Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "ABC News Live: Former Trump Organization CFO pleads guilty to tax fraud" video.

The affidavit won't be unsealed.
4
The CDC was under Trump at the time.
1
Trump CLAIMS he wants the affidavit unsealed, but he isn't in court arguing for that. He wants to know what's in it, but he doesn't want the PUBLIC to know.
1
They're just being assholes, which is their singular skill.
1
@gypsy7818 She's a LIAR: the search warrant has her SIGNATURE as the RECIPIENT of it. Get it straight: just like all other Trump lawyers, they LIE to the PUBLIC. Rudy "TRUTH ISN'T TRUTH!" -- is that a truth? -- Giuliani told all sorts of stories to the PUBLIC, but IN COURT ADMITTED that he had no evidence to support the bogus "election theft" LIE. And he said to a REPUBLICAN who testified to the January 6 Committee that Rudy said to him: "We have lots of theories, but no evidence." See that word "EVIDENCE"? More than 60 cases filed by Trump lawyers were LAUGHED OUT OF COURT for LACK OF EVIDENCE.
1
You have it wrong. They are calling attention to the facts they are about to report. It isn't condescending; rather, you don't like the facts being reported, or that it is a struggle for you to attempt to pretend you didn't hear them.
1
@choof There are two or three people on camera reporting the news. They take turns. Person A gives a report, then person B calls attention to a different angle on person A's report, or to an entirely different topic. It isn't condescension. It is no different than in writing one sets out different subject matter in separate paragraphs. And chapters. So I recommend not reading books as you'll be "offended" by the author providing ques on how to follow what is being written.
1
@gypsy7818 Seriously, Trumper: Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T. That is LAW going back to the first Supreme Court decision, in the 18th century, on the question.
1
@kahlesjf It's simply a way of calling attention to a different view, or specific facts. It is stunning that a viewer would FEEL condescended to by a talking head who doesn't know the viewer exists. It is a mannerism, and nothing more. But apparently those who FEEL it is condescending have only encountered it in the context of argument and felt inadequate against the other's view. Is it "condescending" when opposing counsel in litigation, in court, follows up on the lawyer who omits facts with, "But, your honor, I call attention to X"? Of course not. Condescension is in an overall attitude, not in a pause-for-thought drawing of attention to specifics. alternatives, or additional information. If you're talking about Trump lawyers Bobb or Habba, it is baseless arrogance by individuals who are out of their league but believe bullshitting is legitimate substitute for sound argument. All in all, if one is objecting to the FACTS being reported, so attacks the reporter, then that is both petty and dishonest: the problem isn't the facts; the problem is with the person who doesn't like the facts.
1
It's okay to speak with an accent, but not to hear with one.
1
According to his lawyer Trump was watching via the MAGA-Lardo CCTV system while he was in New York. But the FBI has that covered: these forensic search and seizure are documented in writing, and with photographs and video.
1
Weisselberg kept the two sets of books. Exposing the workings of the Trump criminal enterprise will expose Trump; Trump always claims to be the BOSS in charge, then when targeted he whines that he's a "victim".
1
Trump STOLE gov't property, some of which is classified. Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T.
1
@joevelte4252 This is the LAW on this issue: Trump's THEFT of gov't property is not limited to classified information. ALL information generated by gov't employees is owned BY THE GOV'T. That has been the law since the first Supreme Court ruling on the question in the 18th century. Let's be more particular by presenting the FACTS, oblivious and duped Trumpeter: 1. Several of Trump's WHITE HOUSE lawyers have testified under oath that Trump said of the STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY, "It's mine, it's not theirs." 2. Because Trump refused to cooperate by handing over the GOV'T PROPERTY he STOLE to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), NARA referred the issue to DOJ. 3. After the first 15 boxes were retrieved, and the DOJ and FBI learned that those were not all of the GOV'T PROPERTY Trump STOLE and was ILLEGALLY WITHHOLDING, the DOJ and FBI bent over backwards in effort to cooperate in the retrieval of the rest of the STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY. Trump instead engaged in what he called "negotiation" over the issue. Does law enforcement cooperate with a bank robber who wants to "negotiate" over "whether," "how much," and "when" the robber will return the stolen money? 4. Trump denied having additional STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY so the DOJ/FBI subpoenaed the remainder. Trump provided a few -- proving that his claim to have no mare was FALSE -- and at least one of his lawyers signed a declaration attesting to the "fact" that there were no more STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY to turn over. 5. Finally, because Trump TALKED about "cooperating" but did not do so, the DOJ/FBI got a warrant for search and retrieved even more boxes of STOLEN GOV'T PROPERTY, in total to date more than two dozen. It wouldn't have been an issue if Trump had simply turned over all the documents at the outset. Instead, the PAPER TRAIL of the effort documents Trump LYING, and blowing off a subpoena. And then his lawyer BOBB publicly stated that she was kept from the premises and didn't receive the warrant. IN FACT, as the unsealed warrant/inventory show, BOBB SIGNED the warrant/affidavit as the RECIPIENT of them. Trump has NEVER accepted "NO!" even when the "NO!" is the LAW. So you are arrogantly and stupidly defending CRIME. Question: Is TRUMP above the law?
1
@joevelte4252 The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) smacked down Trump's BULLSHIT on the issue with an explanation of how presidential records -- see Presidential Records Act -- are handled, and how, separately, classified information is handled. That statement smacking down Trump's whiney BULLSHIT was reported by all CREDIBLE media: The NARA maintains control of and administers the presidential records of ALL modern presidencies, including those accessible through presidential libraries. That includes the 33 million Obama presidential records. Obama complied with the Presidential Records Act by turning over ALL those records to NARA, and NARA in cataloging them sent the non-classified to a NARA facility in the Chicago area -- those being accessible to patrons of the Obama Presidential Library -- and all classified information to a facility in the Washington, D.C. area. Thus NARA maintains control over the non-classified records, AND the classified -- and NO ONE outside those in gov't having security clearances and need to know has access to the classified. NONE of that is controversial or rocket science or a new practice. Only Trumpeters don't know that Trump is a CONSTANT LIAR because they WANT to believe his lies. And they -- as do you -- avoid all sources of information that AREN'T propagandists for Trump by perpetuating his lies. So Obama isn't actually the issue -- which is why Trump is LYING about it. THIS is the issue: Is TRUMP above the law?
1
@joevelte4252 Want to know how TRUMP was required to follow the letter of the law? READ the Presidential Records Act. He IGNORED that LAW.
1