Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Ethan, James, and Jennifer Crumbley Case Analysis | Failure to Report Leads to Manslaughter Charges" video.

The gun was bought FOR the son. The father's "discovery" that the gun was "missing" is cover-story.
220
As it turns out, she has a history of not learning how not to get caught. The easiest way to not get caught is to not violate the law.
171
@clivejohnson6468 The gun was bought FOR the son -- and illegal "straw purchase" -- as a Christmas present. And the mother made that clear when she posted online about it being HIS present. So the father was trying to cover his own ass by claiming the son stole it. In fact, as it was bought FOR the son, the son had it all along.
14
@doomguy510 Stop the racist smearing. If there's a crime, fine; but if there isn't, stop the false accusations. And I'm sure you want OTHERS held accountable, but not so much yourself.
12
@doomguy510 Perhaps you should learn to communicate clearly instead of putting responsibility on others to "figure out" your meaning.
9
@doomguy510 Look up the LEGAL definition of "involuntary manslaughter". Then read the mother's text when the kid was caught searching online for ammunition during class -- "Lol. I'm not mad at you. You have to learn not to get caught." That is obviously encouragement to violate the rules, but don't get caught doing it.
9
@pastorpottergabes5292 Troll.
8
Youtube will be the next MySpace soon The father bought the gun as an illegal "straw purchase" FOR the son, who is not old enough to LEGALLY possess a gun.
6
@boughtbot2639 Have you EVIDENCE for that assertion?
6
I believe courts have already addressed it. It may not be settled law at this point -- some courts defending privacy, some protecting public safety. I wouldn't bet on the current Supreme Court being concerned either with privacy or public safety.
3
@AarmOZ84 It didn't help Oswald that he killed the cop with a witness.
3
@GoGreen-l7e That's why, when the shit hit the fan, the parents hired lawyers, and went on the lam, without having visited their son in jail, and leaving him abandoned without a lawyer. There will be other facts about the parents' history, and their long-standing abandonment of the son.
3
@divinetiming8422 If backpacks weren't allowed in the classrooms, then how could the counselor remove the backpack from the classroom?
3
@matthewserrao2926 It may be under a state court ruling that the searches were authorized. When in public school one is on public property, so privacy is at least attenuated.
2
@moorek1967 His mother texted him that his doing wrong was "right"; what was wrong was his getting caught doing it.
2
@moorek1967 "J Nagarya I needed to get the facts about what you said, because it seems you are going on rumors rather than fact. What the text was about from The New York Times. "On Monday, when a teacher reported seeing their son searching online for ammunition, his mother did not seem alarmed. “LOL I’m not mad at you,” Jennifer Crumbley texted her son. “You have to learn not to get caught.” I am going to ask you this, in whose eyes was it a big issue for him looking at ammo on his cellphone? THE TEACHER. We live in a time now when anything you do, someone else gets triggered." What are the RULES of the district and the school? And what class was he in -- "Studies in Gun-Nutism"? It turns out -- FACTS MATTER -- that the teacher was PROPERLY alarmed -- as was the teacher who saw his drawing depicting a violent fantasy, with such words as, "The thoughts won't stop. Help me." CORRECT? Why are you defending mass murder as if that were a First Amendment-protected expression of "freedom"? This is the word missing from your vocabulary: RESPONSIBILITY.
2
@stormybleu6054 Those who respond with that sort of nonsense are uneducated suckers for destructive nonsense, and likely spend their money on those alternative "religions".
2
@honeyspoonbeewrangler4550 Hogwash. Bush wasn't in Dallas that day, though the conspirabunkers lie that he was. If Oswald was a "plant," then why did he kill the cop, with witness, while fleeing? This is not the place for your anti-factual hogwash.
2
@pastorpottergabes5292 Are you an ordained pastor, or one of the many who simply appoint themselves that?
2
@jenniferdaulby5519 The gun was NOT missing. It was bought by the father FOR the son. Thus the gun was with the son all along.
2
@divinetiming8422 You're repeating what I've already pointed out several times.
2
@doomguy510 It is three words. And yet again you fail to communicate clearly.
1
@doomguy510 Personal attack noted. Troll.
1
@doomguy510 If you want to communicate such a "definition," then it is your responsibility to do so. No one else has responsibility to do your work for you. Troll.
1
@moorek1967 "He had NOT exhibited signs of violent behavior before." Have you EVIDENCE for that? No. Instead you are "triggered," like a good little pantywaist "Karen," into making assertion -- again, WITHOUT EVIDENCE -- in defense of violence and mass murder. It isn't the teachers who committed a crime. FURTHER FACTS you OMIT: The father bought the gun FOR the son as a Christmas present. The son posted photo of the gun with the caption, ". . . MY new beauty." His mother posted a photo of the entire gun "kit," at the shooting range, with the caption, "testing" "HIS new present." In sum: the gun was bought FOR THE SON. So it was always in the SON'S possession. The parents ARE IN FACT Trump supporters -- the mother, especially, because of Trump's defense of the LIE against the Second Amendment.
1
Sounds like they were sucked in by the "sovereign citizen" nonsense.
1
@nativetexan53 The Boston University School of Medicine performed a forensic analysis of the actual evidence, including the x-rays of JFK's head, and Gov. Connoly's shirt. The evidence shown matches the Warren conclusions. That documentary was broadcast on PBS. The "conspiracy theories" were begun by illiterates who read Mark Lane's "Rush to Judgment". Lane claimed to have been Oswald's lawyer, and his book was essentially his defense brief. The job of a defense lawyer is to point as many fingers as he can away from his client. That DOES NOT mean the defense brief is actually truthful.
1
@georgemonde8237 Are you saying that the school authorities knew?
1