Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "NewsNation" channel.

  1. NO WARRANT at the time. Trump was "negotiating" through his lawyers. He ALSO didn't comply with SUBPOENA. After all the "cooperative" efforts all that was left to get the documents Trump was WITHHOLDING was by means of warrant for search.
    2
  2. Laundrie is nowhere in Florida.
    2
  3. It did not take long to indict him and issue a warrant. There was obviously a great deal of thorough investigation, which can take much longer.
    2
  4. It's all about the money and spreading the NRA/gun industry attacks on the Constitution.
    2
  5. Yes, it is deliberately inflammatory.
    2
  6. Gone are the days when citizens learned how to distinguish between, on one hand, facts, and on the other, lucrative bullshit.
    2
  7. It only tells you that some information -- the contents of which is ENTIRELY UNKNOWN to you -- hasn't been released.
    2
  8. Too many "supplements" aren't even known to live up to the claims made for them.
    2
  9. You CAN BE CERTAIN that the operation was PHOTOGRAPHED and VIDEOED BY THE FBI.
    2
  10. In handcuffs.
    2
  11. You know nothing about gov't.
    2
  12.  @SnarkierThan-U-R  I posted a comment critiquing the "journalism". It's irrelevant whether anyone responds to it. Instead of attacking me, LEARN how PROPAGANDA works in place of actual objective JOURNALISM.
    2
  13.  @MandrakeDCR  We don't know what it's about yet. But the rest of your comment is false. Those who are competent and responsible plan their move. And EVERY administration is repeatedly instructed on the preservation of documents, and that they belong to the gov't.
    2
  14. Because WARRANT was required. In addition, the DOJ/FBI was establishing a RECORD of the efforts to retrieve the documents in order to undercut Trump's predictable bullshit about the process.
    2
  15.  @Corwin1141  BASIC LAW: There are three primary sources in law: 1. The legislative history -- the DEBATES of the WRITING of the Amendment. 2. The Constitution, all of which is in effect at the same time, and which is deliberately general in order to accommodate the unforeseen. 3. Constitutional provisions are implemented by means of STATUTES, which are more detailed and specific. This is how the law works: The SOURCES of the Amendment were the Militia Causes from four existing state constitutions. All four distinguished between two military forces: "the right of the people," etc. -- the well-regulated Militia -- and standing armies. The DEBATES of the WRITING of the Amendment show that the INTENT of the Amendment was to establish a NATIONAL DEFENSE relying on the well-regulated Militia. That is the subject of the Amendment: well-regulated Militia. That fact is underscored by the Militia Act -- STATUTE -- enacted on May 8, 1792: "An act more effectually to provide for the NATIONAL DEFENCE by establishing an uniform MILITIA throughout the United States. There was only ONE "individual right" debated in the several drafts of the Amendment: ": but no person [INDIVIDUAL] religiously scrupulous of [AGAINST] bearing arms [in well-regulated Militia] shall be compelled [INVOLUNTARY] to render military service in person." That phrase was obviously VOTED DOWN before the Amendment was submitted to the states for consideration and ratification. And note that the first three words of the Constitution are, "We the people" -- not, "We the individual". The Constitution, all of which is in effect at all times, incorporates FOUR Militia Clauses, the Second Amendment being the fourth. This is the first: "Art. I., S. 8., C.15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide" -- which it does by enacting STATUTES -- "for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." This is the second: "Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The CONGRESS shall have Power to provide" -- by means of STATUTES -- "for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia . . . reserving to the States [GOV'TS] respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and te Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed BY CONGRESS." I have an education in law and have been researching these very issues for more than 30 years, which research begins with the laws enacted from the foundings of the several colonies to and through ratifications of state and Federal constitutions. Which means I don't buy the propaganda pumped out by the gun industry -- whose only concern is PROFITS -- and its political front NRA. I adhere exclusively to the law and facts.
    2
  16.  @tbprofile1295  Ah -- I see: so that means he can't have a valid opinion so should shut up. His comments are correct on the law, and Thomas targeting laws the underpinning of which is the RIGHT OF PRIVACY -- which the 6 extremists hold DOES NOT EXIST because the words "right of privacy" don't appear in the Constitution. Do you have a right of privacy? -- not according to this Court. Perhaps you'll learn the hard way that when you target the rights of others for elimination you are actually targeting YOUR OWN rights.
    2
  17. Obviously Russia is telling the truth: it was a fire that caused the damage. That's why they moved ALL their ships some 80 miles from Ukraine. Don't be fooled: the ship was converted into a submarine.
    2
  18. The killer was far from oppressed. In fact, it's reported that his family owns, among extensive real estate holdings, rest homes.
    2
  19. We DO NOT KNOW that HE killed her. When will you speculators stop ignoring the few KNOWN facts in order to make shit up, based on your attitude that some have rights -- Gabby -- and some don't -- Laundrie.
    2
  20. A whole lot of speculation, without a single fact in evidence. Get a life worth living.
    2
  21.  @allemander  They had a choice to face the music, or be criminal fugitives from justice.
    2
  22. You haven't watched many interviews.
    2
  23. Exactly: he slams allegedly "left-leaning" media as "political" -- which is in itself POLITICAL BIAS.
    2
  24. For all we known, Gabby is not missing but hiding, embarasssed by the Utah police video.
    2
  25. The warrant was authorized on Friday. The warrant was executed the next Monday.
    2
  26. The moronic mob yelling is disturbing the ENTIRE neighborhood. Everyone has rights -- not only these jerks. Their lack of consideration for others isn't much different than that of the person they are protesting about.
    2
  27. The affidavit will not be unsealed.
    2
  28. Depends on how things turn out. Nothing is either "always" or "never".
    2
  29. Will Smith committed the CRIME of BATTERY. Stop making excuses for him. We saw who Will Smith REALLY is.
    2
  30. That's why he isn't anywhere in Florida.
    2
  31. Then why does Thomas not act ETHICALLY by recusing from cases in which his WIFE is involved as the Federal LAW REQUIRES? Yeah, I know: you are as clueless as all the others whose rights are being ELIMINATED by this Court while they cheer it on.
    2
  32.  @vern0018  You've never read your "Bible" let alone read the Constitution. And you're lying by asserting that you have, AGAINST the Commandment written by your "God": "Thou shalt not lie."
    2
  33. Veterans are always discarded after a war.
    2
  34. It is not journalism to smear alleged "left-leaning media" -- you name NONE -- but it does define you, politically, as RIGHT-leaning BIAS.
    2
  35.  @epicon6  It wasn't a joke. It was a COMPLIMENT.
    2
  36.  @av8rKCM  One's personal happiness is one's own responsibility. She, however, is still of the belief that "love" means the man can read the woman's mind about what she wants sexually. Infantile -- and irresponsible: she expects him to make her happy without any effort on her part.
    2
  37. FOX has always lied to stupid people for profit.
    2
  38. If these so-called "sleuths" did anything to 'unravel" the case, it would be reflected in the charges. It isn't because they are untrained unqualified to "investigate" anything. What they are are falsely self-important fans of murder-as-entertainment. They've found nothing that the qualified investigators didn't already have.
    2
  39. That's because Trump wants to know what's in the affidavit -- but not for the PUBLIC to know.
    2
  40. There are consequneces to every action, either way. The consequences of NOT supporting Ukraine would be DIRE.
    2
  41. It's EXPLAINED in the WARRANT.
    2
  42.  @robertwadas  If he complied with the subpoena, then why did he still have another 27 boxes of gov't property at MAGA-Lardo?
    2
  43. Defending murder is not a "moral" position -- stop the hypocrisy.
    2
  44.  @billy909420  Legitimate journalists don't take sides -- doesn't "debate". Learn the difference between reporting facts, on one hand, and on the other, politicized infotainment.
    2
  45. Most viewers know nothing about law because it's all politics to them. They are the dregs, most of whom defend Trump regardless how publicly criminal he is.
    1
  46. The posters on the Laundrie property were put there by a woman who trespassed on private property. But some have rights -- that woman an example -- and some don't -- the Laundries.
    1
  47. Rant Paul is a showboating ass. A separate bill could be enacted to protect members of Congress.
    1
  48. The sane need to enact gun control. Abbot eliminated background checks, so now criminals can legally buy guns.
    1
  49.  @gigitulip7935  That's another formulation of the slogan for simpletons, "A good guy with a gun/a bad guy with a gun." There was a "good guy with a gun" in Buffalo; in fact, an ENHANCED "good guy with a gun" as an ex-cop who had training with firearms. But the "bad guy with a gun" was wearing body armor, and the "good guy with a gun" was killed. What's needed is sane gun control. But the "pro"-life extremists on the Supreme Court are about to make matters worse and more murderous, based not on the Constitution but on the extremist "religious" right wing's willingness to use violence to overthrow the gov't and impose its insanity on all of "We the people".
    1
  50. Does the out-of-touch fantasizing ever cease!?
    1