Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Judge sets ruling date on unsealing of Mar-a-Lago affidavit | Rush Hour" video.

  1. 8
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @daviddenson3324  Hillary DID NOT do anything near what Trump did. Clinton was IN GOV'T when she was dealing with classified information. And you HATERS omit the inconvenient facts: 1. At the time Hillary was Sec. of State, the OFFICIAL State Dept. communication channel had been repeatedly hacked and classified information dumped publicly. Her private services was never hacked. The deleted emails were recovered by the FBI, and nothing of consequence was found. The several classified documents on her server had been RECEIVED by her. So yes, you are defending Trump by pretending that dozens of boxes filled with GOV'T PROPERTY, the second batch of which Trump LIED about having turned over when he had not. His lawyer signed a declaration attesting to the fact that Trump had turned over ALL gov't property -- which turned out to be a LIE. 2 Trump STOLE gov't property, which includes classified information. You OMIT the fact that the Presidential Records Act also covers non-classified documents, which were included among the documents seized from MAGA-Lardo. ALL information generated by gov't employees belongs TO THE GOV'T, NOT to the employee. 3. Hillary didn't obstruct justice -- which Trump did by LYING that he'd turned over all the gov't property he STOLE. Hillary didn't operate a system that was insecure, and was still IN GOV'T at the time. Nothing happened to her? Forget the amnesia: Comey re-opening the investigation just before the election -- BEFORE determining that the emails in question were DUPLICATES of emails that had already been investigated -- cost her the election. 4. You are attacking the FBI based on NO EVIDENCE -- you not only, weirdly, defend Comey, but also trash the current DOJ and FBI based on Comey's actions. The problem when one ignores the facts, and thus makes bald-face fact-free assertions, you are not being objective. You are not being honest. The fact is that you are pretending to be objective, but, in fact, you are a Trumper who is attacking the FBI because it's investigation is exposing Trump for what he is and has always been: he has NEVER accepted "NO!" including the "NO!" that is the rule of law.
    1
  14. 1
  15.  @daviddenson3324  How it went down? You're "argument" is simply this: One murderer got away with murder, so no other murderers should be prosecuted. Hillary ALLEGEDLY committed "crimes" -- according to Republicans who smeared and "investigated" her for 30 years, and in every instance ACQUITED her because their smears against her were always FAKE "scandals". Hillary sat an answered questions without evasion or equivocation for 11 hours straight. Never once, in all those decades, did she plead the 5th. Trump repeatedly said that only the MOB pleads the 5th -- then in one deposition he pled the 5th hundreds of times. And you want to WHINE that Hillary's ALLEGED "crimes" were as bad as Trumps!? There isn't a single instance in the history of the United States of a Democratic president engineering and directing an attempted overthrow of the gov't. Trump did that. And you want to WHINE that Hillary wasn't "locked up" without evidence, without trial -- without DUE PROCESS? There's no "how" about it; the two cases are in no wise equivalent in fact or degree. A few emails, WHILE Hillary was Sec. of State, on a private server as a non-hacked alternative to the hacked State Dept. system. DOZENS of boxes of GOV'T PROPERTY, including classified information, STOLEN by Trump and brought to his private unsecured residence. Watch the January 6 hearings: all but two of the witnesses who testified are TRUMP REPUBLICANS, and most of those were IN THE WHITE HOUSE. And the HARD evidence -- from REPUBLICAN sources -- shows Trump was planning the overthrow of the gov't from BEFORE the election. And on January 6 he was informed by the Secret Service that the mob he'd brought to Washington was ARMED with handguns, AR-15s -- in violation of D.C. law -- and other weapons. He KNEW they were armed when he sent them to the Capitol to "fight like hell". There is NO equivalent of that anywhere else in US history. You can readily find the hearings -- they are all over youtube as broadcast by all major media outlets. Even FOX broadcast them. And one can see them without commentary by going to the Committee website. Simply Google "January 6th hearings".
    1
  16.  @daviddenson3324  I do't twist your words; I cut to the chase -- the underlying "argument" you are asserting, which is bogus. Forget the amnesia: let's look at the 2015-16campaign: 1. The FBI was OPENLY investigating Hillary's STOLEN emails. OPENLY investigating is a violation of DOJ policy. 2. At the same time there was a CONFIDENTIAL investigation -- in keeping with DOJ policy -- of the contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian -- which the Mueller investigation subsequently SUBSTANTIATED occurred. 3. Shortly before the election, IN VIOLATION of DOJ policy, REPUBLCICAN Comey announced reopening the Hillary email investigation because emails were found on Anthony Weiner's laptop -- WITOHUT first determining whether those emails were DUPLICATES of emails the DBI had already reviewed. It turned out they were DUPLICATES, so PUBLICLY announcing the reopening of the investigation was a further breach of investigative protocol. As result, Comey helped elect Trump. And you want to push the nonsense that what Hillary was ALLEGED by REPUBLICANS and Trump did, and Comey's assistance to Trump's campaign, were somehow equivalent!? Or that Trump's THEFT of GOV'T PROPERTY, some of which is classified, AND his refusal to turn them over to the gov't, AND his LYING that he had turned them all over which was LYING TO THE GOV'T, is the equivalent of Hillary's campaign being destroyed by REPUBLICAN Comey's breaches of DOJ policy, for which HILLARY should be prosecuted!? Try backing off and relocating your sense of "How to Be HONEST". Trump is NOT the victim, except of his own REFUSAL to take "NO!" even when the "NO!" IS THE LAW.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26.  @jasons73  Those aren't facts. Those are Trump lies. This is how it works, MORON: US intelligence monitors FOREIGN actors, Russians included. If an American wonders into that monitoring -- by, as example, having a phone conversation with a FOREIGN actor, then that is noted, and if necessary investigated. That's what happened to Michael Flynn: intelligence was monitoring the Russian actor, and Flynn called that Russian actor. No phone taps, no spying. And let's look at some more facts, sub-literate anti-American: Trump and his campaign denied having ANY contacts with Russians -- well, there was Michael Flynn who had contact with a Russian agent. The Mueller investigation FORCED the Trump campaign and others around con-man and career criminal Trump to ADMIT they'd had contact with Russian -- after having LIED about it. In the end it was found that there were more than 200 contacts BY the Trump campaign WITH Russian agents. In addition, the Mueller investigation DOCUMENTED at least half half-dozen instances of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE -- which is a CRIME. But instead of DISHONESTLY avoiding the issue by spewing gibberish let's deal with the PRESENT: Trump STOLE gov't property, some of which is classified. And he has told a changing series of LIES about since the warrant for search found MORE boxes of STOLEN gov't property AFTER he lied that he'd turned over all he had. READ the warrant -- or watch CREDIBLE news media -- and the meanings of the three CRIMINAL statutes Trump violated will be explained to you by veteran prosecutors. Or you can continue to be a law-illiterate anti-American defending a con-man and career criminal who wouldn't give you the time of day even while he sucks your wallet dry.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1