Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "FBI search potentially about more than documents | Dan Abrams Live" video.

  1. The Presidential Records Act was relevant ALL ALONG. Since the retrieval of the 15 boxes there has been continuing investigation.
    8
  2. Smearing "left-wing media" as "political" is POLITICAL BIAS.
    2
  3. The 15 boxes were ALREADY removed from MAGA-Lardo. This is the home of a person who is not above the law, and who has ALREADY VIOLATED the Federal Records Act -- a FELONY by STEALING documents that belong to "We the people". Is it NON-political "news" to characterize non-biased media as "left-leaning" and "political"?
    2
  4. Exactly: he slams allegedly "left-leaning" media as "political" -- which is in itself POLITICAL BIAS.
    2
  5.  @boobalooqwe4687  Where is your EVIDENCE, law-illiterate anti-American.
    1
  6. EVIDENCE? Yeah -- we all know you have none.
    1
  7.  @wfgit3380  So you're saying that AG Barr manufactured false evidence against Republicans, and suppressed evidence against Democrats? There's a word that fits you: crackpot.
    1
  8.  @wfgit3380  READ the following, law-illiterate clown -- note that the taped conversations were made by REPUBLICANS: ___ _Trump's Solicitation of Crimes from Georgia Election Officials_: THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: 1. Sixty-Seven Minute Taped Conversation with Trump, Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger, and Others. 2. Taped Conversation with Trump and Georgia Elections Investigator Frances Watson. ___ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT
    1
  9. EVIDENCE? -- yeah, you fascists don't need no stinkin' "evidence". THAT is anti-American.
    1
  10.  @michellemooresings  EVIDENCE? Yep: you provide NONE. To the contrary, we KNOW that TRUMP took at least 15 boxes of documents -- that is STEALING gov't property THAT DID NOT BELONG TO HIM -- to MAGA-Lardo. Those were finally retrieved. But what other documents that he stole did he LIE about having, and REFUSED to return? This is the relevant question: Is TRUMP above the law?
    1
  11.  @michellemooresings  AGAIN: Where is the EVIDENCE that "every other single POTUS" violated the Presidential Records Act? You have NONE; you're simply whining and smearing in effort to avoid the issue, which is intellectually dishonest and unethical -- which is necessary to defending Trump by avoiding the issue. No doubt when you use the term "personal responsibility" you mean everyone but yourself and Republicans. We're waiting for you to come down to earth and deal with the FACTS. Is Trump above the law?
    1
  12. The REPUBLICANS are experiencing backlash for refusing to convict.
    1
  13. Abrams misstated the facts -- the 15 boxes were already retrieved. But within the last several days we got photos of documents in one or more toilets put there by Trump. Likely the evaluation of the documents in the 15 boxes discovered gaps -- and that is what the search warrant is about getting.
    1