Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Director Rob Reiner says he has proof four men killed JFK | NewsNation Prime" video.

  1.  @ngzcaz  What did the treasonous insurrection against the Capitol have to do with "stopping" the alleged "burning buildings" in other cities?
    5
  2.  @Frank-mt5fo  You don't know anything factual about the assassination. You can't even get the names right.
    3
  3. DAMN IT! Get the FACTS -- 1. Mark Lane claimed to have been Oswald's defense attorney. 2. Lane's book Rush to Judgment was his DEFENSE brief in the case. 3. As DEFENSE lawyer, Lane's job was to point anything and everything AWAY from his client. BOTTOM LINE: DEFENSE briefs are NOT OBJECTIVE. Lane is responsible ONLY for establishing a lucrative "conspiracy" INDUSTRY about the assassination. Crackpots, greedy exploiters, and those who can't let go of the loss, insist on ignoring those basic facts about Lane and his book and the profitable junk-industry he spawned.
    2
  4. So many people claim to have proof of a conspiracy -- but none ever produce it because they don't have it. He is wrong. The BU School of Medicine produced a video of their forensic examination of the primary evidence -- including the skull x-rays. The "Warren Commission" got it right.
    2
  5. Gone are the days when citizens learned how to distinguish between, on one hand, facts, and on the other, lucrative bullshit.
    2
  6. It only tells you that some information -- the contents of which is ENTIRELY UNKNOWN to you -- hasn't been released.
    2
  7. You know nothing about gov't.
    2
  8. She lead the cover-up by not mourning publicly. Instead of grieving, the nation has instead substituted escapist rationales about "conspiracies". Tell us why Oswald murdered Officer Tibbet if he wasn't the assassin.
    1
  9. And gone are the times when we didn't make bullshit up about the gov't.
    1
  10.  @sjh9173  What are Hollowood Director Reiner's QUALIFICATIONS?
    1
  11. Gone are the days when you made the effort to learn the difference between fact and horseshit from OUTSIDE gov't intended to undermine confidence in gov't.
    1
  12.  @Frank-mt5fo  None of that happened. Governor Connolly was sitting in FRONT of JFK and fa ing FRONT when JFK was hit. The PHOTOS and X-RAY show small ENTRY wound at top rear of head, and EXPLOSIVE EXIT wound at right temple. That's how bullets work. There was one gunman involved -- Oswald. Tell us why Oswald murdered Officer Tippett. Why, instead of returning to work he hid in the movie theater.
    1
  13.  andrewharper1609  You're obviously new to all this lucrative cottage industry relying on the stupid who believe in hogwash. Wake up: why did Oswald murder Officer Tippett -- which was witnessed? Because he was innocent?
    1
  14.  andrewharper1609  All of this crap began with Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment and the inability of readers to understand that his defense brief was not an objective presentation of fact and evidence. Which "facts" and "evidence" were never tested in a court of law.
    1
  15.  @sherrywoodard8562  If Rob Reiner has the "proof" then why is he withholding it? Haven't we had enough of that game from Republicans and Trump and Giuliani, and all the other loud mouths who make allegations they never back up with PROOF?
    1
  16. Often what the gov't told us was the truth. And now we have Rob Reiner telling us he has "proof" -- but he isn't releasing it. A slew of Trumpers, including Giuliani, played the same game.
    1
  17.  @danieltheal  There was never a time when it was intended that a population believe everything a gov't said is true. Or the equally-childish opposite extreme that nothing the gov't says is true.
    1
  18. And insurrection is not mere "riot". Riots are prosecuted as crimes. Insurrections are tried as the crime of TREASON.
    1
  19. You don't know law, and you are making shit up based on crap produced by loons and grifters. Tell us why Oswald murdered Officer Tippet if it was someone else, or more than he, who shot JFK..
    1
  20. Bullshit. Get a clue: when a person claims they have "proof" -- but never produces it -- they don't have proof. The Boston University School of Medicine did a forensic analysis of the PRIMARY evidence, of which VIDEO was made and broadcast on PBS. The PRIMARY evidence they examined and showed were the photographs and x-rays of JFK's skull. The entry and exit wounds, and the damage to the skull, are exactly as reported by the Warren Commission. Same goes for Governor Connolly's shirt with the bullet that hit sideways and, because hot, burned the fabric. Also run was a test of the Italian Mannlicher-Carnero rifle which was purposely designed so that after a given distance from the barrel the bullet "tumbles'. This the bullet scorch on Connolly's shirt showing that the bullet hit sideways. There is nothing "illegal" in the gov't withholding information to protect national security. But what MATTERS are the claims about documents that cannot, based on the claims being made about them, be known to exist -- but which are nonetheless CLAIMED to exist. And beyond that: the presumed contents of documents which cannot be proven to exist let alone known as to imagined contents. There is one FBI document -- it was publicly released in 1976 -- that the incompetent conspiracy nuts make claims about, but the contents of which REFUTE. It is an FBI memo written on 11/22/1963 at the Dallas FBI office. It memorializes a phone call from George H. W. Bush with his theory of who the assassin was. The conspiracy nuts claim that document PROVES that George H. W. Bush was in Dallas on that date and therefore had a role in the assassination. But if one actually READS the document one learns that the phone all by George H. W. Bush originated in MIDLAND Texas, NOT in Dallas. The same kind of deceit was done with the warrant for arrest of David Koresh of the "Branch Davidians" in the 1990s. It was posted online by Atty. Linda Thompson, and she made claims about it that were DISPROVEN by the actual contents of the warrant. But those who wanted to believe her the anti-gov't hogwash believed what she said of the warrant but DID NOT READ THE WARRANT. I was 14 when the assassination occurred; and through the decades I read numerous books on the assassination, and went back and forth about it. Remember Marr's Crossfire -- in which he claims there were 4 shooters? Horseshit: the head and skull photos and ex-rays show there was one assassin, from behind, and all bullets entered from behind. Only one hit the skull -- at the top rear -- and blew out through the right temple. All the bullshit began with readers who are illiterate in how to read written materials -- foremost being Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment. Lane claimed, whether true or not, that he was Oswald's lawyer, and his book was the DEFENSE BRIEF. A BRIEF in a court case IS NOT OBJECTIVE -- it is ONE-SIDED. As a defense lawyer, it was Lane's JOB to declare Oswald innocent, point fingers away from Oswald, and challenge the evidence. Lane's theory of the case never got tested -- OR PROVEN -- because the case never went to trial. But those who WANT to believe there was a conspiracy, and know nothing about legal process, will swallow what he asserted as if the absolute totally object fact. Except for the numerous hucksters exploiting the assassination -- and the conspiracy nuts -- for $$$$$$$, the fake conspiracies come out of GRIEF, as attempts to understand that which makes no sense. It makes no sense because we don't know why. We do know, though, that very shortly after the assassination, Oswald left the area, and on the way to wherever he was going, he murdered Officer Tippett, which was WITNESSED. And when he was caught in the movie theater -- why was he not returning to finish his workday at the depository? -- he had that gun. Are those the actions of a guy who was innocent?
    1