Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Looking at Hillary Clinton’s emails vs. Trump Mar-a-Lago documents | Dan Abrams Live" video.

It is not journalism to smear alleged "left-leaning media" -- you name NONE -- but it does define you, politically, as RIGHT-leaning BIAS.
2
OMITTED was the fact that the official State Dept. communication network had been repeatedly HACKED. Clinton's server WAS NEVER hacked.
1
Trump is the BOSS of his domain -- so much so that his lawyers file court documents full of political garbage and no law so he loses the cases. If the lawyers lied to the DOJ it is because they were ORDERED to by TRUMP. It's a simple case: Trump STOLE GOV'T PROPERTY, some of which is classified. And it's already CRIMINAL: THEFT of gov't property, and OBSTRUCTING against lawful demand to return the property. There is even WRITTEN LYING to that end.
1
@federov100 If you like the BIAS you deny it exists -- while seeing NON-BIAS as BIAS because it doesn't conform to your closed-minded ideology. Facts matter. BIAS propagandizes. You like being propagandized because you ignorant faction is a minority, so you like being lied to you because you can believe that means you are the majority. You are not. Note the response to the THEFT of GOV'T PROPERTY by Trump: your ilk continues to defend criminality in the belief that it's the only power you have -- you whine falsely about being "victims," which is the foremost LIE told by criminals -- as an "alternative" to the RULE OF LAW. Abrams did a good NON-BIASED account of the fake Clinton "emails" "scandal": there was nothing there. If only he could sustain his ability to be non-biased instead of -- in the middle of a purported "news" report -- labeling others as "biased -- AND NOT NAMING THEM. That kind of generalized broad brushed SMEAR is typical of right-wingers: the only legitimate criticism is of OTHERS with never a criticism of one's own abundant imperfection, let alone one's overt BIAS.
1